Search

The gold standard treatment for high-risk NMIBC is BCG immunotherapy. Some studies suggested an immomodulatory effects for commonly used drugs (ie, ACE-I and ARBs). We aimed to determine whether these drugs impact the prognosis of patients with high-risk NMIBC treated with BCG.Retrospective analysis on 208 patients from a single academic center with primary high-risk NMIBC treated with transurethral resection followed by 6 weekly instillations of BCG and up to 12 monthly maintenance instillations. ARBs or ACE-I use at the time of treatment initiation was recorded. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for clinical and pathological covariates. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and weighted Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare 2-yr failure-free (2-yr FFS), failure-free (FFS), overall recurrence-free (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS).A total of 68 patients were on ACE-I, and 38 on ARBs and treatment respectively. At a median follow-up of 26 months, ACE-I treatment had no significant impact on cancer-related outcomes. Conversely, patients treated with ARBs experienced significant improvements in 2-yr FFS (HR 0.3; 0.1-0.9, P = .004), FFS (HR 0.4, 0.1-0.9, P = .005), and PFS (HR 0.001;0.001-0.001, P.001). No significant impact was found for ARB use in RFS (HR 0.6; P = .09). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these results.our findings support a potential role of the angiotensin-renin system in bladder cancer development. We identified ARBs as potential beneficial drugs that seems to act in synergy with BCG-immunotherapy.

INTRODUCTION Emerging evidence supports the hypothesis that metabolic syndrome is associated with cancer pathogenesis. In particular regarding prostate cancer, observational studies from various settings report different results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to provide a quantitative estimate of the association between metabolic syndrome in prostate cancer, in particular Gleason Score >6, accounting for different study designs. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic research of available literature in English language until 2020 was conducted through in EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and NIH Registry of Clinical Trials. For each study, information regarding the study design, the population, the definition of metabolic syndrome, data relating to prostate cancer were collected. , the association between MetS and outcome of interest was determined by calculating the generic inverse variance with random effects method. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS In the final sample 19 studies were included with total of 114329 patients, 29.4% met the criteria for metabolic syndrome. We report a significant association between metabolic syndrome and prostate cancer in cross-sectional studies (OR 1.30; 95% CI 1.13, 1.49) and for patients with clinically significant prostate cancer (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.23, 1.99]. Association between metabolic syndrome and prostate cancer combining all studies, in cohort studies and case-control studies was not significant. CONCLUSIONS Growing evidence support the association between metabolic syndrome and prostate cancer, bias derived from observational studies might conceal further findings.

Objective: To assess the relationship between the volume of the index lesion (IL) measured at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI; MRIvol) and at radical prostatectomy (RPvol), stratifying it according to Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score. Patients and Methods: We identified 332 men with a positive mpMRI (single lesion with PI-RADS ≥3) who underwent systematic plus targeted biopsy and subsequent RP at two tertiary referral centres between 2013 and 2018. All mpMRIs were reviewed by experienced radiologists using PI-RADS scores. The study outcome was to assess the relationship between MRIvol (based on planimetry from MRI sequence best showing tumour) and RPvol (based on tumour involved area of each RP pathology slice). To achieve this endpoint, we performed a multivariable linear regression analysis (LRA) to predict RPvol using PI-RADS, prostate-specific antigen level, prostate volume, age, digital rectal examination, Gleason score at MRI-targeted biopsy, biopsy history and time from mpMRI to RP as covariates. Non-parametric locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) function was used to graphically explore the relationship between MRIvol and RPvol, stratifying for PI-RADS score. Results: Overall, 24%, 49% and 27% of men had visible PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5 lesions at mpMRI. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) MRIvol and RPvol were 0.67(0.29–1.76)mL and 1.39(0.58–4.23)mL. At LRA, MRIvol was significantly correlated with a RPvol underestimation (slope: 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1–46.3). The non-parametric LOESS analysis showed a non-linear relationship between MRIvol and RPvol. Significant underestimation was reported across all volumes with the highest differences between MRIvol and RPvol in the low volume range (

BackgroundSpatial transcriptomics (ST) combines stained tissue images with spatially resolved high-throughput RNA sequencing. The spatial transcriptomic analysis includes challenging tasks like clustering, where a partition among data points (spots) is defined by means of a similarity measure. Improving clustering results is a key factor as clustering affects subsequent downstream analysis. State-of-the-art approaches group data by taking into account transcriptional similarity and some by exploiting spatial information as well. However, it is not yet clear how much the spatial information combined with transcriptomics improves the clustering result.ResultsWe propose a new clustering method, Stardust, that easily exploits the combination of space and transcriptomic information in the clustering procedure through a manual or fully automatic tuning of algorithm parameters. Moreover, a parameter-free version of the method is also provided where the spatial contribution depends dynamically on the expression distances distribution in the space. We evaluated the proposed methods results by analysing ST datasets available on the 10x Genomics website and comparing clustering performances with state-of-the-art approaches by measuring the spots stability in the clusters and their biological coherence. Stability is defined by the tendency of each point to remain clustered with the same neighbours when perturbations are applied.ConclusionsStardust is an easy-to-use methodology allowing to define how much spatial information should influence clustering on different tissues and achieving more stable results than state-of-the-art approaches.

A 62-year-old man presented with a rising serum concentration of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to 53.3 ng/mL (to convert to μg/L, multiply by 1) and a PSA doubling time of 2.6 months. Computed tomography, fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography, and C-11 choline positron emission tomography demonstrated a parotid mass with innumerable lytic bone lesions and diffuse metastatic disease to the neck and mediastinal lymph nodes. Mediastinal lymph node biopsy revealed salivary ductal adenocarcinoma that produced PSA and demonstrated androgen receptor sensitivity. The patient had a prolonged clinical benefit to first- and second-line hormone therapy, and his PSA levels correlated with treatment response, development of hormone resistance, and progression. In summary, urologists, pathologists, and primary care providers should be aware that a rising PSA level in the setting of a head and neck mass in a patient without a history of prostate cancer does not constitute a diagnosis of metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma and that other primary tumors should be considered and a broader imaging and pathologic evaluation is indicated.

Background The clinical course in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) can be complicated when patients have disease progression after prior treatment with second generation hormone therapy (second HT), such as enzalutamide or abiraterone. Currently, limited data exist regarding the optimal choice of chemotherapy for mCRPC after failing second generation hormone therapy. We sought to evaluate three common chemotherapy regimens in this setting. Methods We retrospectively identified 150 mCRPC patients with disease progression on enzalutamide or abiraterone. Of these 150 patients, 92 patients were chemo-naive while 58 patients had previously received docetaxel chemotherapy before being started on second HT. After failing second HT, 90 patients were assigned for docetaxel-alone (group A), 33 patients received carboplatin plus docetaxel (group B), while 27 patients received cabazitaxel-alone (Group C). A favorable response was defined by more than or equal to 50% reduction in prostate-specific antigen from the baseline level after a complete course of chemotherapy. Survival outcomes were assessed for 30-month overall survival. Results Patients in group (B) were 2.6 times as likely to have a favorable response compared to patients in group (A) (OR = 2.625, 95%CI: 1.15-5.99) and almost three times compared to patients in group (C) (OR = 2.975, 95%CI: 1.04-8.54) (P = .0442). 30-month overall survival was 70.7%, 38.9% and 30.3% for group (B), (A), and (C), respectively (P = .008). We report a Hazard Ratio of 3.1 (95% CI, 1.31-7.35; P = .0037) between patients in group (A) versus those in group (B) and a Hazard Ratio of 4.18 (95% CI, 1.58-11.06; P = .0037) between patients in group (C) compared to those in group (B) CONCLUSION: This data demonstrates improved response and overall survival in treatment-refractory mCRPC with a chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel plus carboplatin when compared to docetaxel alone or cabazitaxel alone. Further investigations are required.

Objectives The use of salvage open- radical prostatectomy (SRP) has not been studied in patients whose primary treatment, Robotic- assisted Laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP), had failed. The aim of this study is to report our primary experience regarding technical feasibility and safety of salvage open radical prostatectomy (SRP) after robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of five patients (n=5) who had undergone SRP after RALP failure for clinically localized prostate cancer evidenced on imaging. Results The patients’ ages ranged from 53.1 to 65.4. They presented to us with raising PSA at their 1st post-RALP check. The median (IQR) post-RALP PSA was 1.98 (1.64 - 10) ng/ml with median (IQR) doubling time of 4 (1.8 -16.9) months. Patients underwent cross-sectional imaging (CT) and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that confirmed presence of residual prostatic tissue. Retropubic open salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) was performed with no peri-operative or post-operative complications. The median follow-up duration was 7.8 years. Only one patient required addition of adjuvant salvage treatment after 9.3 yrs. for signs of cancer progression as evidenced on imaging and by raising PSA. Conclusion In this small case series, SRP was a safe and technically feasible option for management of locally recurrent prostate cancer with residual prostate left behind during primary RALP. Prolonged follow up and further studies are warranted to validate our findings.

Introduction: Adverse pathological features at radical prostatectomy such as extracapsular extension, seminal-vesicle involvement, positive surgical margins and/or lymph node invasion define a part...

Purpose: Pelvic lymph node dissection is an important step during robotic radical prostatectomy. The collection of lymphatic fluid (lymphocele) is the most common complication with potentially seve...

Background Spatial transcriptomics (ST) combines stained tissue images with spatially resolved high-throughput RNA sequencing. The spatial transcriptomic analysis includes challenging tasks like clustering, where a partition among data points (spots) is defined by means of a similarity measure. Improving clustering results is a key factor as clustering affects subsequent downstream analysis. State-of-the-art approaches group data by taking into account transcriptional similarity and some by exploiting spatial information as well. However, it is not yet clear how much the spatial information combined with transcriptomics improves the clustering result. Results We propose a new clustering method, Stardust, that easily exploits the combination of space and transcriptomic information in the clustering procedure through a manual or fully automatic tuning of algorithm parameters. Moreover, a parameter-free version of the method is also provided where the spatial contribution depends dynamically on the expression distances distribution in the space. We evaluated the proposed methods results by analyzing ST data sets available on the 10x Genomics website and comparing clustering performances with state-of-the-art approaches by measuring the spots' stability in the clusters and their biological coherence. Stability is defined by the tendency of each point to remain clustered with the same neighbors when perturbations are applied. Conclusions Stardust is an easy-to-use methodology allowing to define how much spatial information should influence clustering on different tissues and achieving more stable results than state-of-the-art approaches.

Key Points Question Are external beam radiotherapy, with or without brachytherapy boost, or radical prostatectomy associated with differences in prostate cancer–specific mortality or distant metastasis outcomes in patients with high-risk prostate cancer after accounting for delivery of guideline-concordant multimodality therapy? Findings In this cohort study of 6004 men with high-risk prostate cancer and at least 1 additional adverse clinicopathologic feature, no differences in prostate cancer-specific mortality across treatment modalities were identified among patients who received guideline-concordant multimodality therapy, although differences in time to metastasis were observed. However, significant differences in prostate cancer–specific mortality were identified when guideline-concordant multimodality care was not delivered. Meaning These findings suggest that guideline-concordant multimodality care was associated with better prostate cancer–specific mortality outcomes for patients with high-risk prostate cancer., This cohort study assesses prostate cancer–specific mortality and distant metastasis outcomes among men with high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy with or without brachytherapy boost., Importance The optimal management strategy for high-risk prostate cancer and additional adverse clinicopathologic features remains unknown. Objective To compare clinical outcomes among patients with high-risk prostate cancer after definitive treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study included patients with high-risk prostate cancer (as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN]) and at least 1 adverse clinicopathologic feature (defined as any primary Gleason pattern 5 on biopsy, clinical T3b-4 disease, ≥50% cores with biopsy results positive for prostate cancer, or NCCN ≥2 high-risk features) treated between 2000 and 2014 at 16 tertiary centers. Data were analyzed in November 2020. Exposures Radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), or EBRT plus brachytherapy boost (BT) with ADT. Guideline-concordant multimodal treatment was defined as RP with appropriate use of multimodal therapy (optimal RP), EBRT with at least 2 years of ADT (optimal EBRT), or EBRT with BT with at least 1 year ADT (optimal EBRT with BT). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was prostate cancer–specific mortality; distant metastasis was a secondary outcome. Differences were evaluated using inverse probability of treatment weight–adjusted Fine-Gray competing risk regression models. Results A total of 6004 men (median [interquartile range] age, 66.4 [60.9-71.8] years) with high-risk prostate cancer were analyzed, including 3175 patients (52.9%) who underwent RP, 1830 patients (30.5%) who underwent EBRT alone, and 999 patients (16.6%) who underwent EBRT with BT. Compared with RP, treatment with EBRT with BT (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 0.78, [95% CI, 0.63-0.97]; P = .03) or with EBRT alone (sHR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.53-0.92]; P = .01) was associated with significantly improved prostate cancer–specific mortality; there was no difference in prostate cancer–specific mortality between EBRT with BT and EBRT alone (sHR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.67-1.18]; P = .43). No significant differences in prostate cancer–specific mortality were found across treatment cohorts among 2940 patients who received guideline-concordant multimodality treatment (eg, optimal EBRT alone vs optimal RP: sHR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.52-1.09]; P = .14). However, treatment with EBRT alone or EBRT with BT was consistently associated with lower rates of distant metastasis compared with treatment with RP (eg, EBRT vs RP: sHR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.44-0.58]; P

Potential risks of COVID-19 spread during minimally invasive procedures caused several concerns among surgeons, despite the lack of high-level evidence. Urological robotic and laparoscopic surgery is performed in elective setting in almost all occasions, thus allowing adequate planning and stratification. Two high-volume urological centers in Italy performed 77 robotic and laparoscopic surgeries during the "lockdown" period and adopted various strategies to prevent contamination. First of all, all patients were tested negative with nasopharyngeal swab before the surgical intervention. Patients and personnel were provided adequate personal protective equipment and intraoperative strategies to prevent smoke formation and pneumoperitoneum spread were adopted. No patients nor staff members tested positive for COVID-19 during a 15-day follow-up period. In conclusion, minimally invasive urologic surgery can be safely performed during the pandemic period with adequate planning. We believe that renouncing the benefits of it would be counterproductive, especially in a scenario of long-lasting cohabitation with the virus.

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in immediate effects on urological practice, in particular the vast reduction in elective surgeries. These changes are likely to have long-term effects for both patients and for urologists, which will persist even after the pandemic resolves. The many facets of COVID-19’s effects on urology remain to be seen, but they might also offer opportunities to reassess and improve patient management in urology and beyond.

Decision-making in urologic oncology involves integrating multiple clinical data to provide an answer to the needs of a single patient. Although the practice of medicine has always been an “art” involving experience, clinical data, scientific evidence and judgment, the creation of specialties and subspecialties has multiplied the challenges faced every day by physicians. In the last decades, with the field of urologic oncology becoming more and more complex, there has been a rise in tools capable of compounding several pieces of information and supporting clinical judgment and experience when approaching a difficult decision. The vast majority of these tools provide a risk of a certain event based on various information integrated in a mathematical model. Specifically, most decision-making tools in the field of urologic focus on the preoperative or postoperative phase and provide a prognostic or predictive risk assessment based on the available clinical and pathological data. More recently, imaging and genomic features started to be incorporated in these models in order to improve their accuracy. Genomic classifiers, look-up tables, regression trees, risk-stratification tools and nomograms are all examples of this effort. Nomograms are by far the most frequently used in clinical practice, but are also among the most controversial of these tools. This critical, narrative review will focus on the use, diffusion and limitations of nomograms in the field of urologic oncology.

Introduction Several studies have invariably shown that the risk of Grade Group (GG) upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) is higher in elderly men. Whether this is due to a real biological effect or to a diagnostic bias is still unknown. We hypothesized that the introduction of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has improved the diagnostic accuracy of PCa detection in older men thus reducing the risk of GG upgrading at RP reported in the pre-MRI era. Materials and Methods We selected 424 men who received a systematic plus targeted biopsy for a positive MRI and subsequent RP at two referral centers between 2013 and 2019. Upgrading was defined as an increase in GG at final pathology as compared to biopsy. Multivariable logistic regressions tested the risk of upgrading over increasing age according to any upgrading definition and after stratifying definitions according to GG group and biopsy type. Non-parametric functions explored the relationship between age and upgrading rate. Results Median rate of upgrading was 17%. In multivariable models, while age was not associated with increased risk of GG upgrading (p=0.4). At non-parametric analyses, probability of upgrading slightly decreased with age, without reaching statistical significance. In subgroup analyses according to different upgrading definition and to biopsy type, age did not predict higher risk of upgrading regardless of outcome definitions (GG 1 to 2 P = 0.1; GG 2 to 3 P = 0.2; GG 3 to 4-5 P = 0.2) and in GG detected at TBx (OR 0.998, P = 0.8). Conclusions We showed that use of MRI has obliterated the association between older age and increased risk of upgrading mainly due to improved diagnostic approaches in this group of men. Therefore, it is likely that the effect of age and GG upgrading reported in previous studies in elderly men was due to misdiagnosis and lead-time bias in the pre-MRI era.

Background: To assess the diagnostic added value of sampling secondary lesions at prostate mpMRI (SL) in addition to index lesion (IL) in detecting significant prostate cancer (csPCa) when also systematic biopsy (SBx) is performed. Methods: We relied on a cohort of 312 men with two suspicious lesions at prostate mpMRI who underwent subsequent targeted biopsy of each lesion (TBx) and concomitant SBx at two tertiary-referral centers between 2013 and 2019. The study outcome was the added value of targeting SL (i.e., the one with a lower PI-RADS score and/or the smaller size compared to IL) in the detection of csPCa. To this aim, we compared different biopsy strategies (SBx + overall TBx vs SBx + IL-targeted biopsy vs SBx + SL-targeted biopsy) and assessed whether SL features could be correlated with detection of csPCa at overall TBx in a multivariable logistic regression model (MVA). Results: Overall, 44% of men had csPCa at TBx of all lesions while 39% and 23% of men had csPCa found in IL and SL, respectively. The rate of csPCa found at SBx, IL-TBx, and SL-TBx only was 5%, 6%, and 2%, respectively. The detection rate of csPCa for SBx + IL-TBx was 47%. The addition of SL-TBx increased csPCa detection by only 2% (p = 0.12). At MVA, neither PI-RADS of SL nor the number of cores targeting SL was associated with an increased detection of csPCa (all p > 0.3). Conversely, age (OR: 1.07), PSA (OR: 1.07), prostate volume (OR: 0.98), and PI-RADS of the IL (OR: 2.36) were independently associated with csPCa detection at TBx (all p < 0.01). Conclusions: There is no significant benefit in terms of csPCa detection when an adequate SBx is performed in combination with IL-TBx in patients with multiple mpMRI lesions. In these men target biopsy of secondary lesions can be safely omitted.

Purpose COVID-19 pandemic represents a novel challenge for healthcare systems, and it affects even the daily urological practice. Italy was the first country after China to experience a lock-down period. Our objective is to determine whether, during the COVID-19 period, there has been any modification in urological emergencies. Methods we retrospectively reviewed urgent urological consultations requested by the Emergency Department (ED) of Padua University Hospital in the 36-day period between February 22nd and March 30th, 2020 and compared them to the prior year cases within a similar time frame (February 24th to March 31st, 2019). Pediatric population (age

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), EBRT with a brachytherapy boost (EBRT+BT) with ADT, and radical prostatectomy (RP) with or with...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:The clinical course in metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) can be complicated when patients have disease progression after prior treatment with 2nd gene...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:It is well standardized to report detailed MRI characteristics of the so-called index lesion (IL) defined as the lesion with either the highest PI-RADS score or the large...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Curative intent therapies such as radical prostatectomy (RP) might represent an option in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with enlarged lymph nodes at imaging (cN1), no da...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Patients treated with post-prostatectomy radiation therapy (RT) are exposed to a potential risk of genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. However, it is s...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:A rapidly changing scenario in the management of patients with PSA rising after radical prostatectomy (RP) may have determined different patterns of salvage radiation the...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Salvage radiation therapy (SRT) represents a curative treatment option for patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rise after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, a...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:The STAMPEDE trial recently demonstrated a survival benefit for patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa) treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus p...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Salvage lymph node dissection (SLND) is among possible treatment options for patients with node-recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). It is well known that preoperative imagin...

As the COVID-19 spread globally, social distancing, self-isolation/quarantine, and national lockdowns have become crucial to control the pandemic. However, these measures may also lead to increases in social isolation, loneliness, and stress, which can alter the consumption of pornography habits. The aim of the study was thus to explore the interest pattern in pornography and coronavirus-themed pornography during the COVID-19 outbreak. Google Trends® was employed to determine the most popular porn websites (Porn, XNXX, PornHub, xVideos, and xHamster), and coronavirus-themed pornography worldwide and in six nations with different COVID-19 outbreak and self-isolation recommendations. We analyzed every search trend on Google® from January 9, 2020 to May 25, 2020 using "joint point regression analysis". Comparisons of week relative search volume (WRSV) and temporal patterns were analyzed to assess the change of interest in search terms during nations lockdowns. Paired t-test was used to compare WRSV values among the porn websites during the national lockdowns and the equivalent timespan of the weeks in the previous 4 years. The research trend of almost every keyword increased with significant inflection points for those nations with a straight "stay at home orders" (China, Italy, Spain, and France). "PornHub" and "Porn" showed the highest increase of interest worldwide with an average weekend percentage change (AWPC) of 4.9 and 3.8, respectively. The mean WRSV for keywords in USA and Sweden did not show a similar increase as the other nations. The WRSV percentage change with the historical data had a peak during the straight nations' lockdowns (p < 0.01). All the nations had a significant increase in WRSV coronavirus-themed pornography for each keyword (p < 0.01) with an AWPC, ranging worldwide between 18.5 and 61.8 (p < 0.01), after the beginning of self-quarantine. As strengths this study uses a big data technology to collect worldwide trend of interest, however, data are anonymous and do not allow analysis of subpopulation groups. In conclusion, we demonstrated an increased interest in pornography and coronavirus-themed pornography after the outbreak of COVID-19 in nations with a straight "stay at home orders".

Introduction Transitional cell carcinoma recurrence within an intestinal urinary diversion (TCCUD) after radical cystectomy (RC) is a rare condition with unknown origin, prognosis and treatment. The aim of this study was to describe treatment options and oncologic outcomes of this understudied site of recurrence in a multi-institutional case series. Material and methods TCCUD relapse cases after RC were investigated in a retrospective, multi-institutional study. Surgical approach and adjuvant chemotherapy were discussed. Early and late complications were described according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess progression-free and cancer-specific survival. Results A total of 19 patients were selected. The most common presentation was gross hematuria. The median interval between RC and TCCUD was 51.2 months. Fifteen patients (78.9%) underwent surgical excision, and two underwent concomitant radical nephroureterectomy. In 12 (63.1%) cases the site of TCCUD was the uretero-ileal anastomosis. Tumor invading the muscularis of the intestinal diversion was described in 10 (52.6%) cases. Surgical complications occurred in 7/15 (46.6%) patients, of these two with Clavien-Dindo Grade III. Four patients (21.0%) underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and two (10.5%) both chemotherapy and radiation therapy. During follow-up 15 patients (78.9%) presented with other sites of recurrence, with lymph nodes (21.0%) and liver (15.7%) being the most common localizations. Recurrence free and overall survival rates were 36.8% and 15.8%, and 56.5% and 24.2%, respectively at 12 and 18 months. Conclusions Most patients with TCCUD have invasive disease and a substantial percentage experience upper tract cancer during their disease course. TCCUD is often the herald of advanced disease and systemic progression, with poor progression-free and overall survival rates.

The recent COVID-19 pandemic represents a worldwide emergency and it is affecting healthcare at every level, including also urological care and especially oncologic patients. Recent epidemiological models show that, without effective treatment or vaccine, there will be a long-lasting phase of cohabitation with the virus. Current experts' opinions recommend performing only non-deferrable uro-oncological surgery and postponing other activities until the end of the emergency, with particular concerns regarding the safety laparoscopy. Veneto Region and Padua Province represent one of the first site of the pandemic spread of the virus outside China, thus we present our experience as a Urological Referral Center in applying a segregated-team work model of organization during the month of March 2020, with a stratified organization of activities, adequate screening and protection for patients and staff were adopted. Compared to the same period of last year even if a 19.5% reduction was experienced in overall surgical activity while maintaining a comparable proportion of oncologic robotic and laparoscopic surgery and guaranteeing care also for high priority non-oncological patients. No cases of COVID-19 infection were reported in staff members nor in patients and the number of surgical complications was comparable to that of last year. Therefore, in our opinion the recommended significant reduction in urological care, including surgical activities, is likely unrealistic in the long period with unknown effects affecting mostly oncological patients. Our experience introducing a segregated-team work model might represent a model for future planning.

Seeding of tumor cells is a rare complication of minimally invasive surgery. We reviewed and improved current knowledge of prostate cancer seeding.A literature review was performed using MEDLINE®, Embase® and the Cochrane Library, including cases of peritoneal and port site seeding reported after minimally invasive prostatectomy. In addition, after institutionally approved chart review a descriptive summary of a single institution experience on the topic is provided.The data from 9 reported cases of port site metastases from prostate cancer in the world literature are summarized along with 3 additional cases from our experience. Similarly, 5 cases of peritoneal seeding are reviewed from the literature with the addition of 3 more cases from our institution. Good long-term outcomes are achievable with multimodality and individualized regimens, including seeding directed treatments.Although no definitive recommendation can be made for treatment strategies for these patients, there is a need for awareness and further discussion of this atypical presentation.

Key Points Question Is previously occult, nonlocalized (regional or metastatic) disease detected on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) associated with clinically significant outcomes in patients with high-risk and very high-risk prostate cancer? Findings In this cohort study of 5275 patients, a nomogram estimative of an individual’s risk of nonlocalized disease on PSMA PET/CT was significantly associated with long-term outcomes, including distant metastasis and prostate cancer–specific mortality. The nomogram performed favorably compared with other risk-stratification tools. Meaning These findings suggest that previously occult disease may be associated with outcomes in this patient population., This cohort study evaluates the prognostic significance of a nomogram that models an individual’s risk of nonlocalized upstaging on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and compares its performance with existing risk-stratification tools., Importance Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can detect low-volume, nonlocalized (ie, regional or metastatic) prostate cancer that was occult on conventional imaging. However, the long-term clinical implications of PSMA PET/CT upstaging remain unclear. Objectives To evaluate the prognostic significance of a nomogram that models an individual’s risk of nonlocalized upstaging on PSMA PET/CT and to compare its performance with existing risk-stratification tools. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study included patients diagnosed with high-risk or very high-risk prostate cancer (ie, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level >20 ng/mL, Gleason score 8-10, and/or clinical stage T3-T4, without evidence of nodal or metastatic disease by conventional workup) from April 1995 to August 2018. This multinational study was conducted at 15 centers. Data were analyzed from December 2020 to March 2021. Exposures Curative-intent radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), or EBRT plus brachytherapy (BT), with or without androgen deprivation therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures PSMA upstage probability was calculated from a nomogram using the biopsy Gleason score, percentage positive systematic biopsy cores, clinical T category, and PSA level. Biochemical recurrence (BCR), distant metastasis (DM), prostate cancer–specific mortality (PCSM), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Fine-Gray and Cox regressions. Model performance was quantified with the concordance (C) index. Results Of 5275 patients, the median (IQR) age was 66 (60-72) years; 2883 (55%) were treated with RP, 1669 (32%) with EBRT, and 723 (14%) with EBRT plus BT; median (IQR) PSA level was 10.5 (5.9-23.2) ng/mL; 3987 (76%) had Gleason grade 8 to 10 disease; and 750 (14%) had stage T3 to T4 disease. Median (IQR) follow-up was 5.1 (3.1-7.9) years; 1221 (23%) were followed up for at least 8 years. Overall, 1895 (36%) had BCR, 851 (16%) developed DM, and 242 (5%) died of prostate cancer. PSMA upstage probability was significantly prognostic of all clinical end points, with 8-year C indices of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.61-0.65) for BCR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.66-0.71) for DM, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67-0.75) for PCSM, and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.57-0.62) for PCSM (P