Search

Background: Bony Bankart lesions can perpetuate chronic anterior glenohumeral instability. When surgical treatment is pursued, several factors need to be considered to obtain optimal outcomes. Purpose: To (1) quantitatively describe patterns of bone fragment resorption and associated risk factors for developing glenoid bone loss (GBL) and (2) to compare clinical and radiological results of attritional bone loss treated with either the arthroscopic Bankart or the open Latarjet procedure. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted for patients who underwent arthroscopic stabilization (group A1, 10%-20% GBL; group A2, >20% GBL) or open Latarjet (group B, >10% GBL) for recurrent shoulder instability with bony Bankart lesion. Patient characteristics, number of dislocations, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) scores were obtained. Pre- and postoperative computed tomography imaging was used to quantitatively describe patterns of bone fragment resorption. Results: A total of 120 consecutive patients (group A1, 40; group A2, 23; group B, 57) were included in the study, with a mean age of 25.6 years (range, 19-35 years). The average follow-up was 5.0 years for all groups (range, 4.83-5.16 years in group A1, 4.58-5.41 years in group A2, and 4.33-5.67 years in group B). The mean times between dislocation event and surgery were 12.8 months (range, 6-32 months) and 13.6 months (range, 6-38 months) for groups A and B, respectively. Redislocation rates were 7.5% in group A1 versus 13.0% in group A2, and only occurred in patients with ≥13.5% GBL. There were no redislocations for group B (0%). Patients had better WOSI scores in group B (234.1 ± 126.9) than in group A (576.1 ± 224.6) ( P < .0001). In group A, smaller preoperative bone fragment size displayed a higher percentage of resorption after surgery ( r = −0.64; P < .05). Conclusion: A significant inverse relationship exists between preoperative bone fragment size and percentage of postoperative resorption. Patients treated with arthroscopic bony Bankart repair who had final GBL ≥13.5% had worse outcomes. When planned GBL approaches 13.5% in high-demand patients, a smaller fragment size can result in worse clinical outcomes because of resorption. In these cases, choosing the open Latarjet procedure leads to better clinical results.

The authors sought correlations between harvesting of the scapular bone tip free flap used for head-and-neck reconstruction and any shoulder function deficit, particularly at the level of the rotator cuff. The flap permits reconstruction of large and diverse regions of the head and neck, but long-term harvest morbidity has not been investigated extensively. The authors analyzed the clinical records of all patients who underwent head-and-neck reconstructions using free scapular tip flaps in our department over the past 5 years. The inclusion criteria were complete clinical and radiological documentation and follow-up for at least 12 months. Two populations, a surgical and control population, were analyzed. All patients in both populations underwent the simple shoulder test, an internationally validated self-administered test that highlights functional shoulder deficits, and 3 additional tests at orthopedic visits: the external rotation test, Patte test, and external rotation lag sign test. A head-and-neck cancer-specific questionnaire (University of Washington Quality of Life, version 4) was completed by the surgical patients. All statistical analyses were performed using Software IBM SPSS Statistics (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).A total of 19 patients met the inclusion criteria: 11 males (57.8%) and 8 females (42.2%) of mean age 60.9 years (range 23-75 years). In addition, 20 age-and sex-matched volunteers with no history of shoulder pathology were evaluated in terms of shoulder functionality. The average score on the simple shoulder test was 10.55 in the healthy population versus 8.31 in the study population ( P0.001); in particular, shoulder strength differed between the groups. Similarly, the orthopedic examinations revealed clinically significant differences between the controls and patients on the Patte test and external rotation lag sign test (both P0.001), but not the external rotation test ( P0.001). The mean University of Washington Quality of Life was 73.39; most patients reported good quality of life (52.6%), followed by very good (15.7%).The free scapular bone tip flap is valuable for reconstruction of head-and-neck defects; the long and reliable vascularpedicle allows rapid patient mobilization. Morbidity was confined to small reductions in shoulder strength and external rotation, which do not affect quality of life.

Frozen shoulder is a common shoulder concern with a prevalence of 2-5 per cent in the general population that affects the shoulder joint between the ages of 40 and 60, mostly in female subjects, manifesting in progressive loss of glenohumeral movements associated with intense pain.The pathological process consists of a fibroproliferative tissue fibrosis and an inflammation of the synovial membrane. Although the pathophysiology of this condition has been deeply studied, the mechanisms underpinning remain poorly understood.Frozen shoulder manifests clinically as shoulder pain with progressive restricted movement, both active and passive, in the absence of trauma, along with normal radiographic scans of the glenohumeral joint.It classically progresses through 3 overlapping stages of pain (stage 1, lasting 2-9 months), stiffness (stage 2, lasting 4-12 months) and recovery (stage 3, lasting 5-24 months); however, up to day seems that pain-predominant and stiff-predominant phases could be more usefull in treatment modality choice and managing.The medical management has not been defined with a wide spectrum of operative and nonoperative treatments available. The most widely used treatments are local steroid and/or anesthetic injections, stretching, active and passive mobilization, physiotherapy, hydrodistension, capsular release; hoverver, he goals of the treatment are pain management, shoulder function restoration and improvement in quality of life. Based on the best available evidence it appears that the use of corticosteroid injections plus physiotherapy has been associated with better outcomes above all in terms of early benefit in ER ROM with clinical significance as long as 6 weeks of treatments.Nevertheless, it remains unclear which parameters influence the prognosis of the pathology.

An interesting international debate has been developed over the past 10 years (the last decade) surrounding the surgical procedure for recurrent anteroinferior instability and a definitive consensus is lacking on the factors which favor one technique over another, especially when bone loss is present (soft tissue vs. bone block). Glenoid bone loss is commonly observed in the shoulder with anterior instability, and it is difficult to evaluate the shape of the glenoid using plain radiograph, therefore, computed tomography or intraoperative observation is recommended for accurate assessment of glenoid bone loss and Hill-Sachs lesion. When we consider the bony defect of the glenoid as a risk factor for surgical failure, it is crucial to take into consideration the features of a concomitant Hill-Sachs lesion. However, all the previous reports focusing on the size of the Hill-Sachs lesion or on the glenoid bone loss in isolation, overlook the interaction of the 2 lesions through the arc of range of motion and how this may influence instability. The glenoid track is the first model to determine, in a dynamic way, how bone loss on both sides of the joint can lead to instability. The glenoid track is a zone of contact created by the glenoid on the humeral articular surface when the arm is moved along the end-range of motion (abduction and external rotation). The use of the glenoid track concept can potentially help guide surgical decision-making.

Anterior shoulder instability is a significant problem in orthopaedic surgery. It carries a heavy burden on quality of life, especially in young, active patients. Surgical treatment is therefore often carried out in this population. Several strategies can effectively address this issue. Yet, the consensus is lacking on the parameters which favour one technique over another, especially when bone loss is present. This is because of the complex, dynamic interplay between bone loss on the humeral side (ie, Hill-Sachs lesion) and glenoid bone loss, which is a common occurrence and defined as ‘bipolar’. There is an ongoing debate over the percentage of glenoid bone loss warranting bone block procedures: 13.5–15% is an indicator for such procedures (ie, Latarjet), although this value is still considered controversial and not uniformly accepted. A multitude of other factors (ie, age, sex, level of activity and so on) come into play alongside bipolar bone loss and the weight of each factor has yet to be fully elucidated. Also, refining the algorithm for the right procedure in the right patients will reduce the number of side effects stemming from initial, suboptimal treatment choice. Knowing how to manage previous surgical treatment failure is also key for the treating orthopaedic surgeon, who must be able to address the root cause of failure and react accordingly and effectively. This paper analyses key factors in treatment choice, the current stance of the literature on varying degrees of bone loss and choices on surgical treatment failure, lack of evidence and need for future research.

Latarjet technique via open or arthroscopic approach is a very complex surgery that includes several steps. The coracoid placement that is performed at the end of this procedure represents the key point to avoid complications and attain the best clinical results. Mechanics and biology need to work as a whole to improve the integration of the graft on the glenoid neck.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to perform a Delphi consensus for the treatment of patients with shoulder impingement with intact rotator cuff tendons, comparing North American to European shoulder surgeon preferences. Methods Nineteen surgeons from North America [NAP] and 18 surgeons from Europe [EP] agreed to participate and answered 10 open-ended questions in rounds 1 and 2. The results of the first two rounds were used to develop a Likert style questionnaire for round 3. If agreement at round 3 was 60% for an item, the results were carried forward into round 4. For round 4 the panel members outside consensus >60%, Results There was agreement on the following items: impingement is a clinical diagnosis; a combination of clinical tests should be used; other pain generators must be excluded; radiographs must be part of the work up; MR imaging is helpful; the first line of treatment should always be physiotherapy; a corticosteroid injection is helpful in reducing symptoms; indication for surgery is failure of non-operative treatment for a minimum of 6 months. The NAP were likely to routinely prescribe NSAIDs [NA 89%; EU 35%] and consider steroids for impingement [NA 89%. EU 65%]. Conclusion Consensus was achieved for 16 of the 71 Likert items: impingement is a clinical diagnosis and a combination of clinical tests should be used. The first line of treatment should always be physiotherapy, and a corticosteroid injection can be helpful in reducing symptoms. The indication for surgery is failure of non-operative treatment for a minimum of 6 months. The panel also agreed that SAD is a good choice for shoulder impingement if there is evidence of mechanical impingement with pain not responding to non-surgical measures.

Background: Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries are common, and many are adequately treated nonoperatively. Biomechanical studies have mainly focused on static ligamentous stabilizers. Few studies have quantified ACJ stabilization provided by the trapezius. Purpose/Hypothesis: To elucidate the stabilization provided by the trapezius to the ACJ during scapular internal and external rotation (protraction and retraction). It was hypothesized that sequential trapezial resection would result in increasing ACJ instability. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A biomechanical approach was pursued, with 10 cadaveric shoulders with the trapezius anatomically force loaded to normal. The trapezius was then serially transected over 8 trials, which alternated between clavicular defects (CD) and scapular defects (SD); each sequential defect consisted of 25% of the clavicular or scapular trapezial attachment. After each defect, specimens were tested with angle-controlled scapular internal and external rotation (12°) with rotary torque measurements to evaluate ACJ stability. Results: The mean resistance in rotary torque for 12° of scapular internal rotation (protraction) with native specimens was 7.0 ± 2.0 N·m. Overall, internal rotation demonstrated a significant decrease in ACJ stability with trapezial injury ( P < .001). Eight sequential defects resulted in the following significant percentage decreases in rotary torque from native internal rotation: 1.5% (25% CD; 0% SD), 5.6% (25% CD; 25% SD), 5.1% (50% CD; 25% SD), 6.5% (50% CD; 50% SD), 3.8% (75% CD; 50% SD), 7.1% (75% CD; 75% SD), 6.7% (100% CD; 75% SD), and 12.3% (100% CD 100% SD) ( P < .001). The mean resistance in rotary torque for 12° of scapular external rotation (retraction) with native specimens was 7.1 ± 1.7 N·m. External rotation did not demonstrate a significant decrease in ACJ stability with trapezial injury ( P = .596). The 8 sequential defects resulted in decreases in rotary torque from native external rotation of 0%, 3.8%, 4.0%, 3.2%, 3.5%, 3.4%, 4.2%, and 0.7%. Conclusion: Trapezial injury resulted in increased instability in the setting of scapular internal rotation (protraction) of the ACJ. Clinical Relevance: These findings validate the inclusion of deltotrapezial fascial injury consideration in the modified Rockwood classification system. Repair of the trapezial insertion on the ACJ may provide improved outcomes in the setting of ACJ reconstruction.

After a rigorous peer review process, twelve papers were accepted and published. These papers cover a wide range of topics including shoulder arthroscopy, arthroplasty and related neuropathies. This Special Issue focuses on “New trends in shoulder surgery from Biomechanics to the operating room”, and aims to cover recent advancements as well as future trends in the field of shoulder surgical treatments. Lee et al. [1] evaluated the functional and radiologic outcomes of biocompatible non-absorbable PEEK and biocomposite anchors used during rotator cuff repair, focusing on the rate of perianchor cyst formation during the first six months postoperatively. This paper demonstrated that the biocomposite anchor has a statistically significant tendency to form higher grades of fluid collection at 3 months after surgery, though this is usually reduced by the sixth postoperative month. Three papers published by the group of Romano et al. [2,3,4] are focused on both shoulder arthroscopy and arthroplasty. The first one [4] proves that the Infinity-lock button system is effective for the treatment of chronic grade III AC joint dislocation, resulting in elevated satisfaction ratings and predictable outcomes. The second paper [3] analyzes midterm results of onlay lateralized cementless stem reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with valgus/varus malunion proximal humerus fracture sequelae without metaphyseal osteotomy, showing improved clinical outcomes and decreased complications. Our interest in this new prosthesis design has increased over the last decade too, showing better clinical outcomes while using an onlay curved lateralized cementless stem [5,6]. The third paper [2] emphasizes the use of MicroDTTect, bioactive glasses and tantalum cones in periprosthetic joint infections and revision surgery of the shoulder. The application of those instruments would allow for earlier bacterial identification and higher prosthesis–bone interface stability, respectively. Therefore, we are also proud to present the results of our study on the efficacy of the lateral acromioplasty [7]. This technique seems to be safe and reproducible, preventing the recurrence of rotator cuff tears in patients with small and medium lesions and a CSA greater than 35*. A mathematical formula has been proposed to resect the correct amount of acromial bone and decrease the CSA within a favorable range (30°–35°). Ladermann et al. [8] compared scapulothoracic alignment in pathologic type B shoulders with contralateral healthy shoulders. The non-statistically significant results of this study found that Walch type B shoulders had some limitations in maximal glenohumeral motion but exhibited significantly greater anterior scapular tilt with internal rotation, which might be adaptive. Therefore, Ladermann et al. [9] have published an observational study with the aim of determining the incidence of OBPP (obstretical brachial plexus palsy) risk factors in type B patients. They concluded that perinatal factors related to OBPP did not occur in a higher frequency in patients with Walch type B OA compared to the general population, although some of them were in the high normal range. The study presented by Riedl et al. [10] showed the first clinical and structural results of the recently introduced loop LHB tenodesis procedure. This technique provided good-to-excellent overall clinical results after a short-term follow-up of six months, with an inferior incidence of cosmetic deformities compared to conventional therapy options, such as tenotomy and anchor tenodesis. The proper treatment for the long head of the biceps is a topic still debated. Treatments available range from tenotomy to tenodesis, which has been described using different systems and in different positions along the humerus. Our group has recently published a paper comparing high and subpectoral tenodesis during rotator cuff repair [11]. Pascarella et al. [12] tested and demonstrated the effectiveness of triple monitoring (a combination of ultrasound, nerve stimulation and opening injection pressure) while performing an interscalene brachial plexus block (IBPB) for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Three review papers complete this Special Issue. Bozzi et al. [13], with their “Suprascapular Neuropathy around the Shoulder: A Current Concept Review”, present an overview of the state-of-the-art diagnosis and treatment of suprascapular neuropathy. Nerve entrapment is an uncommon but increasingly recognized cause of shoulder pain. It is more frequently diagnosed in over-head athletes or patients with massive rotator cuff tears. Prompt diagnosis is crucial to treat it successfully through a conservative or an arthroscopic procedure, which is then considered the gold standard. Yon CJ et al. demonstrate that arthroscopic revision Bankart repair might lead to an improvement in clinical outcomes and reasonable satisfaction with proper patient selection [14]. Giovannetti de Sanctis et al. [15] compare corticosteroid injections to other drugs in the treatment of partial rotator cuff tears, focusing on the effectiveness of this therapeutic modality in terms of pain and shoulder functionality. PRP injections seem to lead to significantly better outcomes in terms of pain and shoulder function in long-term follow-up. Given these different contributions, it is evident that shoulder surgery still has fundamental questions that remain unanswered. We would like to thank the Editor in Chief for his support throughout the preparation of this Special Issue. We are grateful to all the anonymous reviewers who devoted their precious time reviewing the papers submitted to this Special Issue. Their reviews helped us select the best papers to be included in this Special Issue. We would like also to thank all authors who contributed to this Special Issue. Hopefully you will enjoy reading this selection of articles, as we did, and you will find them informative and helpful in keeping yourself up to date in the field of shoulder surgery.

First patellar dislocation is a common injury of the knee, involving often adolescents and the active population. The consequences of the first episode can be various and potentially disabling. Among these, acute patellar dislocation can often result in recurrent patellar instability. Recurrent patellar instability is certainly multifactorial but depends primarily on the injury of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), the major soft-tissue stabilizer of the patella. Some classifications are extremely useful in establishing the diagnosis and therapy in patellofemoral disease, in particular in terms of instability. Among those, Henri Dejour and WARPS (weak atraumatic risky anatomy pain and subluxation)/STAID (strong traumatic anatomy normal instability and dislocation) classifications are certainly the most frequently used. There is no clear agreement on the management of the first patellar dislocation. A conservative approach seems to be the first choice in most of cases, but the presence of patellar displacement or osteochondral fractures makes surgery mandatory at the beginning. In addition, there is no clear consensus on which surgical strategy should be used to approach first dislocation, in relation to the possible variation in location of the MPFL injury, and to the eventual presence of preexisting predisposing factors for patellar instability. MPFL reconstruction may theoretically be more reliable than repair, while there is no clear evidence available that osseous abnormality should be addressed after the first episode of patellar dislocation. A narrative review was conducted to report the etiology, the diagnosis and all the possible treatment options of the first patellar dislocation. Modern classifications of the patellofemoral instability were also presented.

Framework and suspensory cascade This novel model uses the structure and workings of the industrial crane as a simile to explain the function of the human shoulder. As a crane consists of a base, axial tower, boom and suspensory cascade that move and position loads in space, the base consists of the pelvic platform, with outriggers (legs) that provide stability in human body. The axial tower consists of an articulated spinal column and thoracic platform, which are stabilised by the core muscles. The clavicular boom articulates with the anterior thoracic platform and is elevated by the trapezius from the posterior tower. The ‘suspensory cascade' extends from the skull and cervical spine to the trapezius and on to the clavicle, coracoclavicular ligaments, coracoid process, coracohumeral ligament and humeral head. Motion The rotator cuff muscles take origin from the scapula and coalesce with each other to form a multilayered rotator cuff tendon and cable, which cups to closely contain the humeral head. The four muscles insert into the common tendon and together share the load to stabilise and mobilise the arm in space. The coracoid is a pulley that allows the scapula to swivel on the coracoclavicular ligaments to enable adjustment of the angle of force transmission delivered by the rotator cuff to the humeral head. Stability and control The inferior glenoid and labrum are a fixed organ of compression, which coalesces with the hammock formed by the static inferior glenohumeral ligaments. The rotator cuff and deltoid compress the humeral head onto this static structure. The biceps tendon passes adjacent to the condensations of the coracohumeral ligament to insert into the mobile superior labrum and glenoid. Contraction of the biceps pulls the mobile superior labrum onto the humeral head and tightens the glenohumeral ligaments that wrap around the humeral head at the extremes of motion. The coracohumeral ligament is a sensory organ that interfaces with these structures and is well positioned to work as a servomechanism to redirect the rotator cuff in providing stability, control and motion. Level of evidence Level V.

The purpose of this chapter is to discuss indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of massive cuff tear after prior cuff repair surgery; both indications and contraindications will be considered. The identification of appropriate indications regarding this treatment choice is fundamental to the achievement of good quality results. Significant attention to contraindications is essential to avoid complications. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty makes it possible to restore good range of motion in pseudoparalytic shoulder and reduce associated pain.

Patients with a greater risk of recurrent instability and inferior clinical outcomes following a primary Latarjet procedure can be preoperatively identified on the basis of clinical, radiographic, and demographic criteria. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors influencing the rates of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability and clinical failure following a primary Latarjet procedure.All patients who underwent a primary Latarjet procedure were prospectively enrolled and evaluated. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) outcome scores were collected at a minimum 5-year follow-up along with evidence of recurrent instability. Recurrent instability (recurrent subluxation or dislocation) was considered as a failure. Clinical failure was defined as a postoperative WOSI score of ≥630 points (≤70% normal) or a SANE score of ≤70 points.From 2004 to 2014, 344 patients (358 shoulders) with a mean age of 30.6 years (range, 16 to 68 years) were enrolled and had a mean follow-up time of 75 months (range, 61 to 89 months). The median postoperative WOSI score was 265 points (range, 0 to 1,100 points), and the median SANE score was 88 points (range, 50 to 100 points). Recurrence occurred in 17 shoulders (4.7%), 5 with dislocation and 12 with subluxation; and 28 (8.2%) of 341 shoulders without recurrent instability were clinical failures following a Latarjet procedure. The risk factors for recurrence included atraumatic dislocation (odds ratio [OR], 4.6; p0.01) and bilateral instability (OR, 4.0; p = 0.01), whereas the risk factors for clinical failure (WOSI score of ≥630 points or SANE score of ≤70 points) were female sex (OR, 2.8; p0.01) and bilateral instability (OR, 4.6; p = 0.01).Outcomes at a mean of6 years following a primary Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability were very good, with an overall recurrence rate of 4.7%. An additional 8.2% of cases were defined as clinical failures. Patients with an atraumatic mechanism of primary dislocation, bilateral instability, and female sex were identified to be at a greater risk of recurrence or clinical failure. Although additional work is necessary, patients with capsuloligamentous laxity, relatively atraumatic instability history, bilateral instability, and female sex may be preoperatively identified as having a higher risk of treatment failure after a primary Latarjet procedure.Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Purpose To establish an international expert consensus, using the modified Delphi technique, on the evaluation and management of glenohumeral instability with associated bone loss. Methods A working group of 6 individuals generated a list of statements related to history and physical examination, imaging and specialized diagnostic tests, bone loss quantification and classification, treatment outcomes and complications, and rehabilitation for the management of glenohumeral instability associated with bone loss to form the basis of an initial survey for rating by a group of experts. The expert group (composed of 22 high-volume glenohumeral instability experts) was surveyed on 3 occasions to establish a consensus on the statements. Items with over 70% agreement and less than 10% disagreement achieved consensus. Results After a total of 3 rounds, 31 statements achieved consensus. Eighty-six percent of the experts agreed that a history of multiple dislocations and failed soft-tissue surgery should raise suspicion about the possibility of an associated bone deficit. Ninety-five percent of the experts agreed that 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) is the most accurate diagnostic method to evaluate and quantify bone loss. Eighty-six percent of the experts agreed that any of the available methods to measure glenoid bone deficiency is adequate; however, 91% of the experts thought that an en face view of the glenoid using 3D CT provides the most accurate method. Ninety-five percent of the experts agreed that Hill-Sachs lesions are poorly quantified and classified by current imaging systems. Ninety percent of the experts agreed that in cases with a glenoid bone deficit greater than 20%, glenoid bone graft reconstruction should be performed and any of the available options is valid. There was no consensus among experts on how Hill-Sachs injuries should be managed or on how postoperative rehabilitation should be carried out. Conclusions The essential statements on which the experts reached consensus included the following: A history of multiple dislocations and failed soft-tissue surgery should make surgeons consider the possibility of an associated bone deficit. Three-dimensional CT is the most accurate diagnostic method to evaluate and quantify bone loss. Although any of the available methods to measure glenoid bone deficiency is adequate, an en face view of the glenoid using 3D CT provides the most accurate method. Hill-Sachs lesions are poorly quantified and classified by current imaging systems. Finally, in cases with a glenoid bone deficit greater than 20%, glenoid bone graft reconstruction should be performed. Level of Evidence Level V, consensus statement.

Background: The biomechanical properties of coracoid fixation with a miniplate during the Latarjet procedure have not been described. Purpose: To determine the biomechanical properties of miniplate fixation for the Latarjet procedure compared with various screw fixation configurations. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 8 groups (n = 5 specimens per group) were tested at a screw insertion angle of 0°: (1) 3.75-mm single screw, (2) 3.75-mm double screw, (3) 3.75-mm double screw with washers, (4) 3.75-mm double screw with a miniplate, (5) 4.00-mm single screw, (6) 4.00-mm double screw, (7) 4.00-mm double screw with washers, and (8) 4.00-mm double screw with a miniplate. In addition, similar to groups 1 to 3 and 5 to 7, there were 30 additional specimens (n = 5 per group) tested at a screw insertion angle of 15° (groups 9-14). To maintain specimen uniformity, rigid polyurethane foam blocks were used. Testing parameters included a preload of 214 N for 10 seconds, cyclical loading from 184 to 736 N at 1 Hz for 100 cycles, and failure loading at a rate of 15 mm/min until 10 mm of displacement or specimen failure occurred. Results: All single-screw constructs and 77% of 15° screw constructs failed before the completion of cyclical loading. Across all groups, group 8 (4.00-mm double screw with miniplate) demonstrated the highest maximum failure load ( P < .001). There were no differences in failure loads among specimens with single-screw fixation (groups 1, 5, 9, and 12; P > .05). All specimens in groups 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 (insertion angle of 15°) had significantly lower maximum failure loads compared with specimens in groups 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8 (insertion angle of 0°) ( P < .001 for all). Conclusion: These results indicate significantly superior failure loads with the miniplate compared with all other constructs. Across all fixation techniques and screw sizes, constructs with screws inserted at 0° performed better than constructs with screws inserted at 15°. Clinical Relevance: The use of a miniplate for coracoid fixation during the Latarjet procedure may provide a more durable construct for the high-demand contact athlete.

To review the existing variables and their ability to predict recurrence of shoulder instability as it relates to the Instability Severity Index Score (ISIS), as well as evaluate any other pertinent imaging and patient history variables that may impact risk of recurrent anterior instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair.All consecutive patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and who had arthroscopic instability repair were identified. Exclusion criteria were prior surgery on the shoulder, posterior or multidirectional instability, instability caused by seizure disorder, or a rotator cuff tear. All ISIS variables were recorded (age20 years, sport type and level, hyperlaxity, Hill-Sachs on anteroposterior external rotation radiograph, loss of glenoid contour on anteroposterior radiograph), as well as additional variables: (1) number of instability events; (2) total time of instability; (3) glenoid bone loss (GBL) percent; and (4) Hill-Sachs measures (H/L/W/D/Volume). Postoperative outcomes were assessed based on the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and recurrent anterior instability. Regression analysis was used to determine preoperative variables that predicted outcomes and failures.There were 217 consecutive patients (209 male patients [96.5%], 8 female patients [3.5%]) who met the inclusion criteria and were all treated with a primary arthroscopic shoulder stabilization during a 3.5-year period (2007-2011), with a mean follow-up time of 42 months (range, 26-58). The mean age at first instability event was 23.9 years (range, 16-48 years) and the mean cumulative ISIS score for the overall group was 3.6 (range, 1-6). Outcomes were improved from mean preoperative (WOSI = 1,050/2,100; ASES = 61.0; SANE = 52.5) to postoperative (WOSI = 305/2,100; ASES = 93.5; SANE = 95.5). A total of 11.5% (25/217) of patients had evidence of recurrent instability (subluxation or dislocation). Additionally, all 25 patients who failed postoperatively also had consistently inferior ASES, SANE, and WOSI outcome scores when compared with successfully treated patients. Factors associated with failure were GBL greater than 14.5% (P.001), total time of instability symptoms greater than 3 months (P = .03), Hill-Sachs volume greater than 1.3 cmAt a mean follow-up of 42 months was an 11.5% failure rate after arthroscopic Bankart stabilization surgery. This study shows no correlation between treatment outcome and the ISIS measure, given a mean score of 3.4 for the overall cohort with little difference identified in those who failed. However, several important parameters previously unidentified were detected including, GBL greater than 14.5%, Hill-Sachs volume greater than 1.3 cmIII (Retrospective Case Series).

Purpose The purpose of this study was to establish consensus statements via a modified Delphi process on revision surgery, rehabilitation and return to play, and clinical follow-up for anterior shoulder instability. Methods A consensus process on the treatment using a modified Delphi technique was conducted, with 65 shoulder surgeons from 14 countries across 5 continents participating. Experts were assigned to one of 9 working groups defined by specific subtopics of interest within anterior shoulder instability. Results The primary relative indications for revision surgery include symptomatic apprehension or recurrent instability, additional intra-articular pathologies, and symptomatic hardware failure. In revision cases, the differentiating factors that dictate treatment are the degree of glenohumeral bone loss and rotator cuff function/integrity. The minimum amount of time before allowing athletes to return to play is unknown, but other factors should be considered, including restoration of strength, range of motion and proprioception, and resolved pain and apprehension, as these are prognostic factors of reinjury. Additionally, psychological factors should be considered in the rehabilitation process. Patients should be clinically followed up for a minimum of 12 months or until a return to full, premorbid function/activities. Finally, the following factors should be included in anterior shoulder instability-specific, patient-reported outcome measures: function/limitations impact on activities of daily living, return to sport/activity, instability symptoms, confidence in shoulder, and satisfaction. Conclusion Overall, 92% of statements reached unanimous or strong consensus. The statements that reached unanimous consensus were indications and factors affecting decisions for revision surgery, as well as how prior surgeries impact procedure choice. Furthermore, there was unanimous consensus on the role of psychological factors in the return to play, considerations for allowing return to play, as well as prognostic factors. Finally, there was a lack of unanimous consensus on recommended timing and methods for clinical follow-up. Level of Evidence Level V, expert opinion.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to establish consensus statements via a modified Delphi process on the Latarjet procedure, remplissage, and glenoid-bone grafting for anterior shoulder instability. Methods A consensus process on the treatment utilizing a modified Delphi technique was conducted, with 65 shoulder surgeons from 14 countries across 5 continents participating. Experts were assigned to one of 9 working groups defined by specific subtopics of interest within anterior shoulder instability. Results The technical approaches identified in the statements on the Latarjet procedure and glenoid bone-graft were that a subscapularis split approach should be utilized, and that it is unclear whether a capsular repair is routinely required. Furthermore, despite similar indications, glenoid bone-grafting may be preferred over the Latarjet in patients with bone-loss greater than can be treated with a coracoid graft, and in cases of surgeon preference, failed prior Latarjet or glenoid bone-grafting procedure, and epilepsy. In contrast, the primary indications for a remplissage procedure was either an off-track or engaging Hill-Sachs lesion without severe glenoid bone loss. Additionally, in contrast to the bone-block procedure, complications following remplissage are rare, and loss of shoulder external rotation can be minimized by performing the tenodesis via the safe-zone and not over medializing the fixation. Conclusion Overall, 89% of statements reached unanimous or strong consensus. The statements that reached unanimous consensus were the prognostic factors that are important to consider in those undergoing a glenoid bone-grafting procedure including age, activity level, Hill-Sachs Lesion, extent of glenoid bone-loss, hyperlaxity, prior surgeries, and arthritic changes. Furthermore, there was unanimous agreement that it is unclear whether a capsular repair is routinely required with a glenoid bone graft, but it may be beneficial in some cases. There was no unanimous agreement on any aspect related to the Latarjet procedure or Remplissage. Level of Evidence Level V: expert opinion.

Background: Patients with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability after a failed Latarjet procedure remain a challenge to address. Complications related to this procedure include large amounts of bone loss, bone resorption, and issues with retained hardware that necessitate the need for revision surgery. Purpose: To determine the outcomes of patients who underwent revision surgery for a recurrent shoulder instability after a failed Latarjet procedure with fresh distal tibial allograft. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent revision of a failed Latarjet procedure with distal tibial allograft were prospectively enrolled. Patients were included if they had physical examination findings consistent with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Patients were excluded if they had prior neurologic injury, a seizure disorder, bone graft requirements to the humeral head, or findings of multidirectional or posterior instability. History of shoulder instability was documented, including initial dislocation history, duration of instability, number of prior surgeries, examination findings, plain radiographic and computed tomography (CT) data, and arthritis graded with Samilson and Prieto (SP) classification. All patients were treated with hardware removal, capsular release with subsequent repair, and fresh distal tibial allograft to the glenoid. Outcomes before and after revision were assessed according to the American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES), Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE), and Western Ontario Shoulder Index (WOSI) and statistically compared. All patients underwent a CT scan of the distal tibial allograft at a minimum 4 months after surgery. Results: There were 31 patients enrolled (all males), with a mean age of 25.5 years (range, 19-38 years) and a mean follow-up time of 47 months (range, 36-60 months) after revision with distal tibial allograft. Before distal tibial allograft augmentation, the mean percentage glenoid bone loss was 30.3% (range, 25%-49%). All patients after their Latarjet stabilization had recurrent shoulder dislocation (11/31, 35.5%) or subluxation (20/31, 64.5%), and all patients had symptoms consistent with recurrent shoulder instability upon physical examination. Radiographs demonstrated 2 fixation screws in all cases, mean SP grade was 0.5 (range, 0-3), and CT scans revealed that a mean 78% of the Latarjet coracoid graft had resorbed (range, 37%-100%). Patient-reported outcome scores improved significantly pre- to postoperatively for ASES (40 to 92, P = .001), SANE (44 to 91, P = .001), and WOSI (1300 to 310, P = .001). There were no cases of recurrence, and a final CT scan of the distal tibial revision demonstrated a complete union at the glenoid–distal tibial allograft interface in 92% of patients. Conclusion: The majority of the failed Latarjet procedures included in this study had near-complete resorption of the coracoid graft and hardware complications. At a minimum follow-up time of 36 months, patients who underwent revision treatment for a failed Latarjet procedure with a fresh distal tibial allograft demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and near-complete osseous union at the glenoid-allograft interface. Although patients evaluated with recurrent anterior shoulder instability after a failed Latarjet procedure remain a challenge to address, fresh distal tibial allograft augmentation is a viable and highly effective revision procedure to treat this patient population.

Shoulder stability depends on several factors, either anatomical or functional. Anatomical factors can be further subclassified under soft tissue (shoulder capsule, glenoid rim, glenohumeral ligaments etc) and bony structures (glenoid cavity and humeral head). Normal glenohumeral stability is maintained through factors mostly pertaining to the scapular side: glenoid version, depth and inclination, along with scapular dynamic positioning, can potentially cause decreased stability depending on the direction of said variables in the different planes. No significant factors in normal humeral anatomy seem to play a tangible role in affecting glenohumeral stability. When the glenohumeral joint suffers an episode of acute dislocation, either anterior (more frequent) or posterior, bony lesions often develop on both sides: a compression fracture of the humeral head (or Hill–Sachs lesion) and a bone loss of the glenoid rim. Interaction of such lesions can determine ‘re-engagement’ and recurrence. The concept of ‘glenoid track’ can help quantify an increased risk of recurrence: when the Hill–Sachs lesion engages the anterior glenoid rim, it is defined as ‘off-track’; if it does not, it is an ‘on-track’ lesion. The position of the Hill–Sachs lesion and the percentage of glenoid bone loss are critical factors in determining the likelihood of recurrent instability and in managing treatment. In terms of posterior glenohumeral instability, the ‘gamma angle concept’ can help ascertain which lesions are prone to recurrence based on the sum of specific angles and millimetres of posterior glenoid bone loss, in a similar fashion to what happens in anterior shoulder instability.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:632-640. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180028

The purpose of this study is (1) to test the proposed treatment algorithm, the Glenoid Track Instability Management Score (GTIMS), which incorporates the glenoid track concept into the instability severity index score (ISIS), and (2) to compare treatment decision-making using either GTIMS versus ISIS in 2 cohorts of patients with operatively treated anterior instability.A multicenter, retrospective review of two consecutive groups consisting of 72 and 189 patients treated according to ISIS and GTIMS, respectively, was conducted. Inclusion criteria for all patients were ≥2 confirmed traumatic anterior shoulder instability events and a physical examination demonstrating a positive anterior apprehension and relocation test. The GTIMS was graded for all 189 patients in the cohort, which uses 3-dimensional computed tomography as the sole radiographic parameter to assess on-track (0 points) versus off-track (4 points) Hill-Sachs lesions. This method differs from ISIS, which uses multiple plain radiographs for the 4-point imaging portion of the score. Outcomes scores were compared within the GTIMS and ISIS groups, as well as between them for overall comparisons based on the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), the Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) score, and the mean rates of recurrent instability.A total of 261 consecutive patients from 2009 to 2014 who presented with recurrent anterior shoulder instability were treated according to either ISIS (n = 72/261, 27.6%) or GTIMS (n = 189/261, 72.4%). At a mean follow-up time of 33.2 months (range 24-49 months), the overall cohort mean ISIS of 2.9 ± 2.2 (range 0-9) was significantly higher than the mean GTIMS of 1.9 ± 1.9 (range = 0-9, P.001). Of the 72 ISIS treated patients, 50 (69.4%) had an ISIS score of ≥ 4 and underwent a Latarjet, and the 22 patients (30.6%) with an ISIS score of4 underwent an arthroscopic Bankart repair. Based on GTIMS in the 189-patient cohort, using the same cutoff of 4 to indicate the need for a Latarjet, 162 patients were treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair (85.7%) and 27 with Latarjet (14.3%). The overall outcomes improved for patients treated with a Latarjet in both groups (GTIMS WOSI from 1099 [47.7% normal] to 395 [81.3% normal]; GTIMS SANE from 48 to 81; ISIS WOSI from 1050 [50% normal] to 345 [83.4% normal]; ISIS SANE from 50 to 84; P.01). Similar positive outcomes were seen in patients treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair (GTIMS WOSI from 1062 [49.2% normal] to 402 [80.6% normal]; GTIMS SANE from 49 to 82; ISIS WOSI from 1080 [51.8% normal] to 490 [76.7% normal]; ISIS SANE from 48 to 77; P.01). Of note, the patients with arthroscopically indicated ISIS had significantly worse outcomes scores than those treated arthroscopically according to GTIMS (P.01). Of the 189 patients graded with GTIMS, there would have been 33 more Latarjet procedures recommended based on ISIS score. Thus the distribution of procedures based on ISIS versus GTIMS was significantly different (χWhen ISIS scoring and plain radiograph parameters only are used, this predicted a 2-fold increase in recommending a Latarjet versus GTIMS scoring criteria, which uses advanced imaging and the on- and off-track principle to more conservatively delineate anterior instability treatment with promising postoperative patient outcomes. Overall, there were minimal differences in outcomes between GTIMS and ISIS Latarjet patients; however, better outcomes were seen in patients indicated for arthroscopic Bankart repair according to GTIMS and on-off track computed tomography scanning indications.II, Prospective Cohort Study.

The pulley has recently been described as a structure that aids in the prevention of biceps instability. The biceps pulley or “sling” is a capsule ligamentous complex that acts to stabilize the long head of the biceps tendon in the bicipital groove. The pulley complex is composed of the superior glenohumeral ligament, the coracohumeral ligament, and the distal attachment of the subscapularis tendon and is located within the rotator interval between the anterior edge of the supraspinatus tendon and the superior edge of the subscapularis tendon.

The vast majority of shoulder injuries in overhead athletes should initially be approached with a conservative treatment. Only significant structural injuries with loss of function deserve early surgical intervention. Every overhead athlete requires a training program that strengthens all elements of the kinetic chain of the throwing motion. To prevent the effects of overtraining or throwing, it is essential to instruct the athlete what to do through specific exercises throughout the year.

The mobility of the glenohumeral joint in multiple anatomic planes is not without consequence as recurrent instability is common, particularly among young, active individuals. Throughout midranges of shoulder motion, stability is conferred primarily by the compression-cavity effect of the rotator cuff as muscular contractions maintain the humeral head centred in the glenoid cavity. At extremes of shoulder motion (flexion and abduction), derangements of capsule-ligamentous complex, glenoid and glenoid labrum drive a pathophysiological cascade that manifests clinically as recurrent anterior, unidirectional instability. In the setting of bone loss 25% of the glenoid width, with the Latarjet procedure being favoured among recent authors. A growing body of evidence has elucidated the consequence of humeral head defects (the Hill-Sachs lesion) as a predictor of recurrent instability. Thus, the concept of ‘bipolar bone loss’ has emerged as a critical concept in the surgical treatment of recurrent shoulder instability. Surgeons should adopt a treatment paradigm that focuses on the relationship between both osseous defects—glenoid and humeral head—and incorporates a surgical tactic to appropriately address each lesion.

Purpose To identify the relation between the Hill-Sachs (H-S) angle and arm position at the time of the initial dislocation, and to see if this correlates with the glenoid track. Methods A total of 102 patients (89 male patients, 87.2%), with a mean age of 32 years (range, 17 to 38 years), were divided into 2 groups, abduction (ABD) and adduction (ADD), dependent on the position of the arm at the time of the instability event. All patients were evaluated with bilateral computed tomography scans (3-dimensional) to define the H-S position on the glenoid track and to measure the H-S angle. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the H-S angle between the 2 groups. Results Dislocation occurred in ABD in 45 patients (44.1%) and in ADD in 57 (55.9%). The H-S angle was 32.4° ± 4.7° in the ABD group versus 16.1° ± 2.9° in the ADD group. All patients' injuries were "on-track" glenoid injuries in both groups. Conclusions This study identified a difference in the H-S angle relative to arm position at the time of initial dislocation. Patients whose injury occurred in the ABD position showed a higher H-S angle, leading to an increased risk of engagement, because the long axis of the H-S lesion is parallel to the glenoid in a position of function. Thus arm position at the time of the initial instability event may be a risk factor for engagement and higher risk of recurrence. Level of Evidence Level IV, prognostic case series.

In the anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss among 25 % or more of the inferior glenoid diameter (inverted-pear glenoid), the consensus of recent authors is that glenoid bone grafting (Latarjet procedure) should be performed. The engaging Hill-Sachs lesion has been recognized as a risk factor for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. We have developed a method using radiographic and arthroscopic studies and the concept of the glenoid track to determine whether a Hill-Sachs lesion will engage the anterior glenoid rim, whether or not there is concomitant anterior glenoid bone loss. If the Hill-Sachs lesion engages, it is called an "off-track" Hill-Sachs lesion; if it does not engage, it is an "on-track" lesion. On the basis of our quantitative method, we have developed a treatment paradigm with specific surgical criteria for all patients with anterior shoulder instability (first dislocation or recurrent dislocation), both with and without bipolar bone loss.

Arthroscopic Bankart repair has become the most common treatment option for patients who have anterior shoulder instability. Although arthroscopic Bankart repair is generally an effective treatment method, it may be insufficient for the treatment of many patients who have anterior shoulder instability. Risk factors for failure of arthroscopic Bankart repair include younger age, level and type of sport, and shoulder specific risks, such as ligamentous laxity and the presence of bone loss. Recently, researchers have defined the limits of arthroscopic Bankart repair and more clearly defined treatment options for patients who have a high risk for failure after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Surgeons must recognize patients with anterior shoulder instability in whom a more aggressive surgical approach should be considered as well as patients who have a high risk for failure after arthroscopic Bankart repair to optimize outcomes in this patient population.

Transfer of the coracoid process to the anterior aspect of the glenoid was devised and described independently in three different centers, leading to different eponyms.

Transfer of the latissimus dorsi and/or teres major to the humeral head is an important tool in the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. For an optimal length of transfer without undue tension, the tendon and muscle belly need to be released from insertion to the scapular border. However, the proximity of neurovascular structures may make a transfer hazardous if not taken into consideration during dissection. This chapter will give an overview of the structural and functional anatomy of the normal latissimus dorsi and teres major with its neurovascular supply, as well as the functional anatomy related to the transferred tendon.

When considering the management of shoulder anterior instability with glenoid bone loss ≥25 % of the inferior glenoid diameter (inverted-pear glenoid), the consensus among recent authors is that glenoid bone grafting should be done. Although the engaging Hill-Sachs lesion has been recognized as a risk factor for recurrent anterior instability, there has been no generally accepted methodology for quantifying the Hill-Sachs lesion taking into account the geometric interplay of various sizes and various orientations of bipolar (humeral-sided plus glenoid-sided) bone loss. Keeping the glenoid track concept in mind, if a Hill-Sachs lesion engages the anterior glenoid rim, with or without concomitant anterior glenoid bone loss, it is possible to manage this pathology, reducing the risk of recurrent shoulder instability after surgery. If the Hill-Sachs engages, “Remplissage” or “Latarjet” surgical procedures are indicated depending of glenoid bone loss.

International audience; BackgroundSeptic complications after colorectal surgery are frequent and sometimes life-threatening. It is well-known that inflammation impairs the healing process. It has been suggested that preoperative ongoing inflammation could increase the risk of postoperative infections. This study aimed to elucidate the role of preoperative inflammation on postoperative infectious complications and to understand if, through biological markers, it is possible to identify preoperatively patients at higher risk of infection. MethodsA prospective, observational study was conducted in three centers from November 2011 to April 2014. Consecutive patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery with anastomosis were included. Any ongoing infection was an exclusion criterion. C-reactive protein, albumin, prealbumin and procalcitonin plasma levels were measured preoperatively. Postoperative infections were recorded according to the definitions of the Centers for Diseases Control. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were analyzed and compared to assess the accuracy of each preoperative marker. ResultsFour-hundred and seventy two patients were analyzed. Infectious complications occurred in 118 patients (25%) and mortality in 6 patients (1.3%). In the univariate analysis, preoperative C-reactive protein and albuminemia were found significantly associated with postoperative infectious complications (P = 0.008 and P = 0.0002, respectively). Areas under the ROC curve for preoperative C-reactive protein and albuminemia were 0.57and 0.62, respectively. ConclusionsThis study confirms the association between preoperative inflammatory activity, hypoalbuminemia and the onset of infections after surgery. Trials aiming to decrease the inflammatory activity before surgery in order to prevent postoperative complications are warranted.

According to Horak and Nilsson 5 % of all fractures in the human body are fractures of the proximal humerus (PHF) [1].

Treatment of patients with glenohumeral joint instability is a complex process and involves a complete understanding of the functions and role of both the static and dynamic stabilizers of the glenohumeral joint. Additionally, a thorough knowledge of the surgical concepts and procedures outlined throughout this fine text to address the compromised anatomical structures in the patient with glenohumeral instability is of critical importance as well. The purpose of this chapter is to review the rehabilitative concepts and protocol for the treatment of the patient following arthroscopic Bankart reconstruction.

Tennis injuries have been reported throughout all regions of the body with more common areas being the spine, the ankle and the shoulder. Tennis injuries can occur as a consequence of a trauma (acute injuries, more common in the lower extremity), but most of the injuries in tennis can be defined as overuse injuries (chronic injuries, more common in the upper extremity and trunk) coming from the repetitive microtrauma inherent in the sport. Upper extremity injuries were most frequently located in the elbow and the shoulder regions, with tendon injuries of the shoulder and tennis elbow (humeral epicondylitis) as most frequent injuries. Lower extremity injuries were most frequently located in the ankle and the knee regions, with ankle sprain and patellar tendinosis as most frequent injuries. Usually upper extremity injuries are associated with kinetic chain dysfunction, scapular dyskinesis and GIRD. The repetitive stressors and loading sequences in tennis create muscular imbalances specific to the sport that requires preventative interventions believed to lower injury risk. This chapter will show an overview of the epidemiology and the mechanism of the most common injuries in tennis players.

PURPOSE: The Latarjet procedure is frequently performed when treating traumatic anteroinferior shoulder instability. This procedure is supposed to have a triple effect: osseous, muscular and ligamentous. The main stabilizing mechanism in cadaver studies on fresh-frozen shoulders seems to be the sling effect produced by the subscapularis and the conjoint tendon. It has been hypothesized that muscle contraction in ABER position (abduction-external rotation) is able to translate the humeral head posteriorly and superiorly due to the sling effect. The aim of this study was to analyse the humeral head translation relative to the glenoid with the arm in ABER position with and without muscle contraction. METHODS: Twenty-one subjects divided into two groups (Group A: after Latarjet; Group B: healthy subjects) were examined with an open MRI system with the shoulder in abduction-external rotation (ABER) position to analyse humeral head translation during muscle activity. RESULTS: In normal shoulders, there was no significant difference in anteroposterior or superoinferior translation between the rest position and the muscle-activated state. In subjects after the Latarjet procedure, the difference was significant and was also significant between both groups of subjects for posterior translation, but not for superior translation. CONCLUSION: In patients treated with Latarjet procedure, there are significant changes in glenohumeral translation during muscular activity when in ABER position, with the humeral head going more posteriorly, in comparison with normal shoulders. This study confirms the stabilizing sling effect of the transposed conjoint tendon in the ABER position. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective case-control study, Level III.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to compare the new combination of intraarticular + subacromial injection, with intraarticular, subacromial injection and interscalenic brachial plexus block as postoperative analgesia in shoulder arthroscopy. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients scheduled for shoulder arthroscopy were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of five groups: intraarticular, subacromial, interscalenic brachial plexus block (IBPB), intraarticular + subacromial (intraarticular + subacromial) injection or a control group. All patients received standardized general anaesthesia and all the injections were given with the same dose and volume of local anaesthetic. The number of boluses (fentanyl 1 microg kg(-1) delivered by a patient-controlled analgesia pump applied at the end of the surgery and the visual analogue pain score (VAPS) at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 h after the intervention were recorded. A patient satisfaction score was also assessed at 24 h. RESULTS: Mean bolus consumption, compared with control group, was significantly less in all groups (P < 0.01). Intraarticular + subacromial group utilized fewer boluses compared with subacromial group and significantly lower boluses than intraarticular group (P < 0.01), but IBPB group utilized significantly fewer boluses than intraarticular + subacromial group. Patients in IBPB, intraarticular + subacromial and subacromial groups showed VAPSs that were significantly better than that of the control group at all time points (P < 0.01). The VAPS in intraarticular + subacromial group was statistically comparable with those in IBPB and subacromial groups at each time interval. IBPB and intraarticular + subacromial groups showed comparable patient satisfaction scores. CONCLUSION: These results confirm the analgesic efficacy of IBPB for shoulder surgery. Nonetheless, the combination of intraarticular and subacromial infiltration, studied for the first time, appears to be a clinically valid alternative with no clinical meaningful adverse effects.

International audience; BACKGROUND: Exposure of the surgical team to toxic drugs during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains a matter of great concern. During closed-abdomen HIPEC, operating room staff are not exposed to drugs, but the distribution of the heated liquid within the abdomen is not optimal. With open-abdomen HIPEC, the opposite is true. Although the open-abdomen method is potentially more effective, it has not become a standard procedure because of the risk of exposure of members of the team to drugs. METHODS: We present a new technique (closed HIPEC with open abdomen) which ensures protection against potentially contaminating exposure to liquids, vapours and aerosols, and allows permanent access to the whole abdominal cavity. Its principle is to extend the abdominal surgical wound upwards with a sort of "glove-box". The cutaneous edges of the laparotomy are stapled to a latex "wall expander". The expander is draped over a special L-section metal frame placed above the abdomen. A transparent cover containing a "hand-access" port, like those used in laparoscopic surgery, is fixed inside the frame. RESULTS: In 10 patients, this device proved to be hermetic for both liquids and vapours. Intra-abdominal temperature was maintained between 42 and 43 degrees C during most of the procedure. The whole abdominal cavity was accessible to the surgeon, allowing optimal exposure of all peritoneal surfaces. CONCLUSION: This technique allows optimal HIPEC, while limiting the potential toxic effects for the surgical, medical and paramedical teams.

“Primary frozen shoulder syndrome” or simply “frozen shoulder” constitutes a self-limited disorder and, therefore, conservative treatment should be the first treatment option. After failing a well-supervised, 6-month physical therapy program and three steroid injections, arthroscopic capsular release (ACR) is indicated. This surgical procedure carries certain advantages over other treatment alternatives including capsular distension or manipulation under anesthesia. First, it allows precise and controlled release of the capsule and ligaments reducing the risk of traumatic complications observed after forceful shoulder manipulation. Second, ACR is a straightforward surgical technique. Third, radiofrequency excision of the involved structures along with postprocedural oral steroid administration delays healing and allows for a tolerable rehabilitation program. Fourth, the procedure is performed with the patient fully awake under interscalene block, which boosts patients’ confidence and adherence to a physical therapy protocol. In patients with refractory frozen shoulder, ACR remains a valuable option and leads to a quicker and consistent recovery.

The posterior approach to the shoulder is an uncommon surgical procedure, as it is reserved only for posterior shoulder instability or posterior fractures of the scapula; conditions representing a very low percentage incidence among shoulder injuries – arthroscopy is most often used for posterior shoulder instability. However, the knowledge of the anatomical structures of said posterior region can allow access without risking damage to the posterior anatomic structures of the scapular region or to the glenohumeral joint.