1. Social-ecological Protective and Risk Factors Associated with Depressive Symptoms among Black Adolescents.
- Author
-
Thomsen KN, Howell KH, Gilliam HC, Ahmed AM, and Thurston IB
- Abstract
Exposure to direct and intergenerational adversity can negatively affect the mental health (e.g., depressive symptoms) of adolescents. Black adolescents are at particularly heightened risk for experiencing adversity due to systematic exposure to racism-related stress and discrimination; yet most Black youth do not develop mental health problems. Given this context, the current study explored social-ecological protective factors (e.g., internal assets, mother-adolescent communication, community cohesion) that Black adolescents may access to mitigate depressive symptoms. The sample included 141 Black adolescents and their mothers. Adolescents ranged in age from 11 to 17 (M
age = 13.70; SD = 2.02) and more than half identified as girls (64.08%). Mothers were between the ages of 28 and 64 (Mage = 37.91; SD = 7.64). Hierarchical linear regression modeling was used to (1) assess the direct effects of social-ecological factors and adversity-related variables on depressive symptoms while controlling for socioeconomic status, and (2) examine the moderating effects of the social-ecological factors on the association between direct adversity and depressive symptoms. Results indicated that less adversity exposure, more internal assets, and better mother-adolescent communication were associated with fewer depressive symptoms. Further, mother-adolescent communication moderated the relation between adolescents' adversity exposure and their depressive symptoms, such that more effective mother-adolescent communication reduced the strength of the relation between adversity and depressive symptoms. Future interventions targeting depression in Black adolescents may benefit from focusing on familial communication and bolstering internal assets., Competing Interests: Compliance with Ethical Standards. Funding: This work was supported by the National Institute of Health (R15HD089410; PI: Howell). This support does not necessarily imply endorsement of the study’s research conclusions by the funding agency. Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Ethical Approval: Prior to data collection, all aspects of the current study were approved of by the University of Memphis Institutional Review Board. Informed Consent: The study conformed to APA ethical standards of informed consent/assent and confidentiality for participants. Participant consents did not include permission for public release of deidentified data. As such, aggregate data may be available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF