Search

Traumatic events can be associated with positive change, termed "post-traumatic growth." Existing resesarch suggests some overlap between post-traumatic growth and value-directed living. This study sought to explore the relationship between post-traumatic growth and value-directed living after acquired brain injury. Self-report questionnaires including the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, Valued Living Questionnaire, Engaged Living Scale, Valuing Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, World Health Organization Well-Being Index, Brief Resilience Scale, Trauma Screening Questionnaire and Glasgow Outcome Scale were posted to 317 individuals who had experienced a head injury, stroke or subarachnoid haemorrhage in the previous 3–13 years, with a hospital admission of minimum 7 days. Questionnaires were completed by 81 participants. Post-traumatic growth was significantly positively associated with two measures of value-directed living (VLQ, r =.269; VQ, r =.215). Higher levels of value-directed living were significantly associated with increased positive outcomes (wellbeing) and reduced negative outcomes (distress, post-traumatic stress symptoms). There was no significant association between post-traumatic growth and any of these outcomes. The association between post-traumatic growth and value-directed living indicates possible common underlying processes. Value-directed living appears to be a more useful concept, as it was associated with clinically relevant outcomes. It is recommended that value-directed living interventions are considered in brain injury rehabilitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate, psychometrically, a new measure of tearful emotionalism following stroke: Testing Emotionalism After Recent Stroke – Questionnaire (TEARS-Q). Setting: Acute stroke units based in nine Scottish hospitals, in the context of a longitudinal cohort study of post-stroke emotionalism. Subjects: A total of 224 clinically diagnosed stroke survivors recruited between October 1st 2015 and September 30th 2018, within 2 weeks of their stroke. Measures: The measure was the self-report questionnaire TEARS-Q, constructed based on post-stroke tearful emotionalism diagnostic criteria: (i) increased tearfulness, (ii) crying comes on suddenly, with no warning (iii) crying not under usual social control and (iv) crying episodes occur at least once weekly. The reference standard was presence/absence of emotionalism on a diagnostic, semi-structured post-stroke emotionalism interview, administered at the same assessment point. Stroke, mood, cognition and functional outcome measures were also completed by the subjects. Results: A total of 97 subjects were female, with a mean age 65.1 years. 205 subjects had sustained ischaemic stroke. 61 subjects were classified as mild stroke. TEARS-Q was internally consistent (Cronbach's alpha 0.87). TEARS-Q scores readily discriminated the two groups, with a mean difference of −7.18, 95% CI (−8.07 to −6.29). A cut off score of 2 on TEARS-Q correctly identified 53 of the 61 stroke survivors with tearful emotionalism and 140 of the 156 stroke survivors without tearful emotionalism. One factor accounted for 57% of the item response variance, and all eight TEARS-Q items acceptably discriminated underlying emotionalism. Conclusion: TEARS-Q accurately diagnoses tearful emotionalism after stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Post-stroke emotionalism, outbursts of involuntary crying or laughing, is common after stroke. Little is known about the psychosocial factors associated with this neurological disorder. Aim: To investigate participant's experiences of emotionalism and explore how they managed their symptoms. Methods: A qualitative study that used framework analysis. Participants were recruited across inpatient and outpatient stroke settings. The average time since stroke was 4.3 months. Results: Eighteen semi-structured interviews were conducted. Four themes were identified: (1) Spontaneous and uncontrollable emotional reactions; (2) Incongruence; (3) Social reactions (sub-theme: The stigma of expressed emotions) and (4) Convalescence. Participants with negative experiences described greater disability, avoidance and mood problems. Positive experiences were shaped by a better understanding of the condition, an increased sense of control, social support and optimism. Few participants knew that their emotionalism was caused by stroke. Embarrassment and social withdrawal were commonly reported and had a detrimental effect on participant's mood and quality of life. Conclusions: Earlier recognition of emotionalism in clinical settings is needed as is promoting discussions about emotional reactions after-stroke. This will reduce the likelihood that patients will develop erroneous beliefs about emotionalism and unhelpful coping responses that may lead to adjustment difficulties in the months that follow their stroke. The unpredictable and uncontrollable nature of emotionalism can be embarrassing and cause social withdrawal or avoidance. Waiting for emotionalism episodes to pass, distraction, humor or optimism and social support are successful means of managing the condition. Professionals play a key role in raising awareness that emotionalism is a neurological condition and not a clinical mood disorder as this will promote better understanding for patients, their families and those around them. Encouraging patients to talk about their emotional reactions early after stroke will normalize their experiences and may prevent them from developing unhelpful beliefs that could affect their approach to recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Post-stroke emotionalism (PSE) is common. Trials of antidepressants for PSE suggest only modest clinical benefit and risk of side effects. There have been no trials of non-pharmacological treatments for PSE; in fact, little is known about the non-pharmacological treatments actually provided to PSE sufferers in clinical practice. Objectives: To determine the non-pharmacological interventions provided by stroke professionals, their perceived effectiveness, and the factors associated with the intention to provide them. Methods: Focus groups and published sources of information were used to construct a comprehensive list of non-pharmacological approaches for PSE. This was followed by a national (online) survey of 220 UK stroke clinicians from nursing, medicine, and the allied health professions to investigate the approaches used in clinical practice, using Theory of Planned Behavior components to determine the factors associated with intention to provide them. Results: Most respondents reported high intention to provide non-pharmacological interventions from the list that was constructed. Offering reassurance and talking to patients about goals were the commonest interventions, and distraction and tensing facial muscles least common. Respondents who perceived others to hold them professionally responsible for carrying out non-pharmacological approaches were more likely to use them, as were respondents who held more positive attitudes. Conclusions: Our survey data reveal that stroke clinicians report regular use of non-pharmacological interventions for PSE. There is a pressing need for well-conducted clinical trials to evaluate the effectiveness of these approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]