Search

Objectives Development of a validated triaging system that can be used by obstetric providers to identify obstetric patients at risk of developing severe morbidity during an admission is urgently required. Maternal Critical Care Working Group (MCCWG) recommended a 'level of care' strategy that based patient acuity needs on number of individual organ systems requiring support. The objective of this study was to apply the MCCWG level of support for critical care (MCCWG LOC) scoring to pregnant women admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) to predict maternal outcomes and to compare it to the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scoring system. Methods In this retrospective study, we applied the MCCWG LOC scoring to pregnant women admitted to an ICU at the Detroit Medical Center, between January 2006 and December 2010. The MCCWG LOC was scored on admission to the ICU, and patients were subsequently divided into two groups (Group 1, patients requiring Level 1 and 2 support and Group 2, patients requiring level 3a and 3b support) and their outcome variables were compared. The MCCWG LOC scores were also compared to APACHE II scoring, an ICU scoring system, to test if an alignment of the two systems existed, and if they were able to predict outcomes such as death, hospital and intensive care stay. Results Sixty-nine pregnant women (0.25 % of deliveries) required admission to the ICU and 3 maternal deaths were reported. Sixty-four (92.7 %) patients had pre-existing medical problems. Fifty-eight (84 %) of admissions were secondary to a medical diagnosis. Mean APACHE II score (p < 0.018) and APACHE II predicted mortality rate were significantly higher in Group 2 (p < 0.018). The hospital length of stay (LOS) (p < 0.017) and ICU LOS (p < 0.0001) were significantly longer in Group 2 as compared to Group 1. Group 2 patients required more interventions while in the ICU (p < 0.0001). All the patients who died were classified as Group 2. Conclusions for Practice In a cohort of women requiring intensive care admission during pregnancy, MCCWG LOC, a simplified organ system based, triaging scoring system, predicted maternal outcomes and correlated with APACHE II score. Our data support initiatives for further development and testing of global obstetric triaging scoring systems for the purposes of risk stratification, monitoring of quality and resource allocation., Author(s): Mili Thakur[sup.1] [sup.2] , Bernard Gonik[sup.2] , Navleen Gill[sup.2] , Awoniyi O. Awonuga[sup.2] , Frederico G. Rocha[sup.2] , Juan M. Gonzalez[sup.2] [sup.3] Author Affiliations: (1) Division of Genetic and [...]

Fetal dextrocardia is a type of cardiac malposition where the major axis from base to apex points to the right side. This condition is usually associated with a wide spectrum of complex cardiac defects. As a result, dextrocardia is conceptually difficult to understand and diagnose on prenatal ultrasound. The advantage of four-dimensional sonography with spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) is that this modality can facilitate fetal cardiac examination. A novel method known as fetal intelligent navigation echocardiography (FINE) allows automatic generation of nine standard fetal echocardiography views in normal hearts by applying intelligent navigation technology to STIC volume datasets. In fetuses with congenital heart disease, FINE is also able to demonstrate abnormal cardiac anatomy and relationships when there is normal cardiac axis and position. However, this technology has never been applied to cases of cardiac malposition. We report herein for the first time, a case of fetal dextrocardia and situs solitus with complex congenital heart disease in which the FINE method was invaluable in diagnosing multiple abnormalities and defining complex anatomic relationships. We also review the literature on prenatal sonographic diagnosis of dextrocardia (with an emphasis on situs solitus), as well as tricuspid atresia with its associated cardiac features. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The recommendation for elective induction of labor (IOL) is to await ≥39 weeks. Studies show earlier maturity of Blacks compared to Whites. The objective was to examine the effect of the Black race on the risk of intrapartum and neonatal complications after IOL. Methods: Black women with non-indicated IOL at 37–42 weeks were selected from the CDC-Birth Cohorts 2007–2010. Congenital anomalies, hypertension/diabetes, low-birth weight, breech presentation, previous cesarean and premature rupture of membranes were excluded. Intrapartum/neonatal complications were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios, using 39 weeks as reference. Results: 311 264 black were compared with 2 451 774 deliveries of other races. For Blacks, the risks of cesarean delivery and intrapartum complications were lower at 38 weeks. Chance of vaginal delivery was greater at 38 weeks. Risks of neonatal complications was not increased at 38 compared to 39 weeks. Conclusions: Intrapartum complications were lower at 38 than at 39 weeks in Blacks with no increased risk of neonatal complications. Meconium staining and fetal distress were higher as early as at 40 weeks, perhaps due to accelerated maturation. While a 39-week goal is simple and benefits many patients, a more “personalized medicine” approach may benefit even more mothers and babies. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objective: To evaluate clinical outcomes of women with singleton pregnancies that underwent intra-amniotic dye instillation (amniodye test) following equivocal diagnosis of prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM).Method: Records of 34 pregnant women who underwent amniodye test for equivocal PROM were reviewed. Comparisons of characteristics, amniotic fluid (AF) cultures, AF interleukin (IL)-6 concentrations, and placenta pathology results between women who tested positive and those who tested negative were performed. A sub-analysis of women who were amniodye test-negative was also performed.Results: (1) Commonest indication for amniodye test was a typical history of PROM with positive conventional tests and persistently normal AF volume, (2) amniodye test-positive women had a shorter procedure-to-delivery interval (p = 0.008), and a greater proportion of histologic acute chorioamnionitis (p = 0.04) and funisitis (p = 0.01) than amniodye-negative women, and (3) in addition to similarities to women with amniodye-positive test, amniodye test-negative women who delivered <34 weeks, had a greater proportion of women with risk for preterm birth (p = 0.04), than their counterparts who delivered between 34 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks.Conclusion: Equivocal diagnosis of PPROM should warrant an amniodye test to avoid iatrogenic intervention in women with intact amniotic membranes. AF analysis should be performed in amniodye test-negative women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]