1. Improving explainability of post-separation suicide attempt prediction models for transitioning service members: insights from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers - Longitudinal Study.
- Author
-
Edwards ER, Geraci JC, Gildea SM, Houtsma C, Holdcraft JA, Kennedy CJ, King AJ, Luedtke A, Marx BP, Naifeh JA, Sampson NA, Stein MB, Ursano RJ, and Kessler RC
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Adult, Longitudinal Studies, Young Adult, United States, Machine Learning, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Military Personnel psychology, Suicide, Attempted psychology, Suicide, Attempted statistics & numerical data, Resilience, Psychological
- Abstract
Risk of U.S. Army soldier suicide-related behaviors increases substantially after separation from service. As universal prevention programs have been unable to resolve this problem, a previously reported machine learning model was developed using pre-separation predictors to target high-risk transitioning service members (TSMs) for more intensive interventions. This model is currently being used in a demonstration project. The model is limited, though, in two ways. First, the model was developed and trained in a relatively small cross-validation sample (n = 4044) and would likely be improved if a larger sample was available. Second, the model provides no guidance on subtyping high-risk TSMs. This report presents results of an attempt to refine the model to address these limitations by re-estimating the model in a larger sample (n = 5909) and attempting to develop embedded models for differential risk of post-separation stressful life events (SLEs) known to mediate the association of model predictions with post-separation nonfatal suicide attempts (SAs; n = 4957). Analysis used data from the Army STARRS Longitudinal Surveys. The revised model improved prediction of post-separation SAs in the first year (AUC = 0.85) and second-third years (AUC = 0.77) after separation, but embedded models could not predict post-separation SLEs with enough accuracy to support intervention targeting., Competing Interests: Ethics approval: The Human Subjects Committees of the University of Michigan, the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, and the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command approved all recruitment, consent, and field procedures. A total of n = 72,387 respondents across these three STARRS surveys consented to link their deidentified survey data with Army administrative data. There are no identifiable images from human research participants involved in the current study. The present study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent: All participants provided written informed consent. Competing interests: In the past 3 years, Dr. Kessler was a consultant for Cambridge Health Alliance, Canandaigua VA Medical Center, Child Mind Institute, Holmusk, Massachusetts General Hospital, Partners Healthcare, Inc., RallyPoint Networks, Inc., Sage Therapeutics and University of North Carolina. He has stock options in Cerebral Inc., Mirah, PYM (Prepare Your Mind), Roga Sciences and Verisense Health. In the past 3 years, Dr. Stein received consulting income from Actelion, Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Aptinyx, atai Life Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bionomics, BioXcel Therapeutics, Clexio, EmpowerPharm, Engrail Therapeutics, GW Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Roche/Genentech. He has stock options in Oxeia Biopharmaceuticals and EpiVario. He is paid for his editorial work on Biological Psychiatry (Deputy Editor) and UpToDate (Co-Editor-in-Chief for Psychiatry). The remaining authors declare no competing interests., (© 2025. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF