Search

Patients with advanced v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B V600 (BRAFV600) mutant melanoma who progressed on prior treatment with v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF)/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors and programmed cell death 1 or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 immune checkpoint inhibitors can benefit from retreatment with the combination of a BRAF- and a MEK-inhibitor ('rechallenge'). Hydroxychloroquine can prevent autophagy-driven resistance and improve the efficacy of BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors in preclinical melanoma models. This clinical trial investigated the use of combined BRAF-/MEK-inhibition with dabrafenib and trametinib plus hydroxychloroquine in patients with advanced BRAFV600 mutant melanoma who previously progressed on prior treatment with BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Following a safety lead-in phase, patients were randomized in the phase 2 part of the trial between upfront treatment with dabrafenib, trametinib and hydroxychloroquine (experimental arm), or dabrafenib and trametinib, with the possibility to add-on hydroxychloroquine at the time of documented tumor progression (contemporary control arm). Ten and four patients were recruited to the experimental and contemporary control arm, respectively. The objective response rate was 20.0% and the disease control rate was 50.0% in the experimental arm, whereas no responses were observed before or after adding hydroxychloroquine in the contemporary control arm. No new safety signals were observed for dabrafenib and trametinib. Hydroxychloroquine was suspected of causing an anxiety/psychotic disorder in one patient. Based on an early negative evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio for adding hydroxychloroquine to dabrafenib and trametinib when 'rechallenging' BRAFV600mutant melanoma patients, recruitment to the trial was closed prematurely.

Intratumoral (IT) myeloid dendritic cells (myDCs) play a pivotal role in initiating antitumor immune responses and relicensing of anti-tumor cytotoxic T lymphocytes within the tumor microenvironment. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) induces immunogenic cell death, thereby providing maturation signals and enhancing the release of tumor antigens that can be captured and processed by CD1c (BDCA-1)In this phase I trial, patients with advanced melanoma who failed standard therapy were eligible for IT injections of ≥1 non-visceral metastases with T-VEC on day 1 followed by IT injection of CD1c (BDCA-1)In total, 13 patients were enrolled (cohort 1 n=2; cohort 2 n=2; cohort 3 n=3; cohort 4 n=6). Patients received a median of 6 (range 3-8) T-VEC injections. The treatment was safe with most frequent adverse events being fatigue (n=11 (85%)), fever (n=8 (62%)), and chills/influenza-like symptoms (n=6 (46%)). Nine (69%) and four patients (31%), respectively, experienced pain or redness at the injection-site. Clinical responses were documented in injected and non-injected lesions. Two patients (cohort 3) who previously progressed on anti-PD-1 therapy (and one patient also on anti-CTLA-4 therapy) developed a durable, pathologically confirmed complete response that is ongoing at 33 and 35 months following initiation of study treatment. One additional patient treated (cohort 4) had an unconfirmed partial response as best response; two additional patients had a mixed response (with durable complete responses of some injected and non-injected lesions). On-treatment biopsies revealed a strong infiltration by inflammatory cells in regressing lesions.IT coinjection of autologous CD1c (BDCA-1)NCT03747744.

PD-1 Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as Pembrolizumab, can have a durable beneficial therapeutic effect in patients with advanced melanoma. However, not all patients will benefit equally from these therapies, and (potentially life-threatening) immune-related adverse events may occur. In this study, we investigate the value of early response assessment by FDG-PET/CT as a biomarker for predicting survival. We identified all patients with advanced melanoma who were treated with Pembrolizumab in our medical center and underwent a baseline and at least one follow-up FDG-PET/CT. The total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) was calculated, and the evolution was compared to survival parameters. A total of 77 patients underwent a baseline and at least one follow-up FDG-PET/CT, 36 patients had follow-up imaging within 2–4 months, and 21 patients an FDG-PET/CT 5–6 months after baseline. When the TMTV evolution was categorized into two subgroups (stable/decrease versus increase), an association was found between stability or decrease in TMTV and better PFS and OS. A similar trend, however non-significant, was observed at 5–6 months. The evolution in TMTV as assessed by FDG-PET/CT 2–4 months after treatment initiation is associated with long-term outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma treated with Pembrolizumab.

PURPOSE: The present study investigates by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) the retinal capillary plexus and choriocapillaris flow voids and their possible correlation with MEKAR. METHODS: 34 eyes of 17 patients (61.5 years [30.4-77.4]) with stage IV cutaneous melanoma were included prospectively. All patients showed disease progression under treatment with Nivolumab/Ipilimumab and were subsequently treated with the MEK-inhibitor Trametinib 2 mg once daily. At the start and every 6 weeks during follow-up of 4 months, patients underwent a complete ophthalmologic exam, OCTA and when needed fluorescein angiography. RESULTS: Statistical analysis was performed on 17 eyes of 9 patients. Eight patients were excluded due to missing OCTA images or due to drop-out because of decease or change of treatment. Comparing vessel area density (P = .625 and 0.681, respectively), vessel skeleton density (P = .996 and 0.766, respectively) of the superficial and deep capillary plexus, flow void number and total flow void area (mm2 and %) (P = .495; 0.197 and 0.298, respectively) of choriocapillaris slab, before and after treatment, revealed no significant difference. The evolution of choriocapillaris flow void parameter did not significantly differ in patients, who developed MEKAR compared to patients who did not. CONCLUSION: In patients receiving MEK-inhibitor with and without MEKAR, no significant different characteristics of the retinal capillary plexus and choriocapillaris were found. These data suggest that the development of MEKAR, has no correlation with vascular alteration.

In the last two decades, an increasing number of so-called molecular-targeted therapies have become available for the treatment of patients with advanced malignancies. These drugs have included inhibitors of proteins in the MAPK pathway, such as BRAF and MEK inhibitors, which are characterized by a distinct toxicity profile. The eye is particularly susceptible to adverse effects due to MEK inhibitors, and the term MEKAR (MEK-inhibitor-associated retinopathy) indicates the presence of subretinal fluid, mimicking central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). The pathogenesis of the retinal alterations related to MAPK pathway inhibitors is still unclear, and questions are still open. The present study aims to assess the presence of retinal pigment epithelium alterations as predictive parameters for retinal toxicity, analyzing, at the same time, the chorioretinal vascular network in patients undergoing BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment for different malignancies.

Background Pituitary carcinomas are rare but aggressive and require maximally coordinated multimodal therapies. For refractory tumors, unresponsive to temozolomide (TMZ), therapeutic options are limited. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may be considered for treatment as illustrated in the present case report. Case We report a patient with ACTH-secreting pituitary carcinoma, progressive after multiple lines of therapy including chemotherapy with TMZ, who demonstrated disease stabilization by a combination of ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) and nivolumab (anti-PD-1) ICI therapy. Discussion Management of pituitary carcinoma beyond TMZ remains ill-defined and relies on case reports. TMZ creates, due to hypermutation, more immunogenic tumors and subsequently potential candidates for ICI therapy. This case report adds support to the possible role of ICI in the treatment of pituitary carcinoma. Conclusion ICI therapy could be a promising treatment option for pituitary carcinoma, considering the mechanisms of TMZ-induced hypermutation with increased immunogenicity, pituitary expression of CTLA-4 and PD-L1, and the frequent occurrence of hypophysitis as a side effect of ICI therapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Molecular-targeted therapy with BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors has shown impressive activity in patients with advanced BRAFV600 mutant melanoma. In this review, we aim to summarize recent data and possible future therapeutic strategies involving small-molecule molecular-targeted therapies for advanced BRAFV600 wild-type melanoma. RECENT FINDINGS: In patients with NRASQ61 mutant melanoma, downstream MEK-inhibition has shown some albeit low activity. MEK-inhibitors combined with novel RAF dimer inhibitors, such as belvarafenib, or with CDK4/6-inhibitors have promising activity in NRAS mutant melanoma in early-phase trials. In patients with non-V600 BRAF mutant melanoma, MEK-inhibition with or without BRAF-inhibition appears to be effective, although large-scale prospective trials are lacking. As non-V600 BRAF mutants signal as dimers, novel RAF dimer inhibitors are also under investigation in this setting. MEK-inhibition is under investigation in NF1 mutant melanoma. Finally, in patients with BRAF/NRAS/NF1 wild-type melanoma, imatinib or nilotinib can be effective in cKIT mutant melanoma. Despite preclinical data suggesting synergistic activity, the combination of the MEK-inhibitor cobimetinib with the immune checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab was not superior to the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab. SUMMARY: As of today, no molecular-targeted therapies have shown to improve survival in patients with advanced BRAFV600 wild-type melanoma. Combinatorial strategies, involving MEK-inhibitors, RAF dimer inhibitors and CDK4/6-inhibitors, are currently under investigation and have promising activity in advanced BRAFV600 wild-type melanoma.

Background: Optimal dosing and duration of adjuvant treatment with PD-1 and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibitors have not been established. Prior to their regulatory approval we investigated a low-dose regimen of nivolumab with or without ipilimumab in a sequential dual-cohort phase II clinical trial. Methods: Following the complete resection of melanoma metastases, patients were treated with a single fixed dose of ipilimumab (50 mg) plus 4 bi-weekly fixed doses of nivolumab (10 mg) (cohort-1), or nivolumab for 1 year (10 mg fixed dose, Q2w x9, followed by Q8w x4) (cohort-2). Twelve-months relapse-free survival (RFS) served as the primary endpoint. Results: After a median follow-up of 235 weeks for cohort-1 (34 patients), and 190 weeks for cohort-2 (21 patients), the 12-months RFS-rate was, respectively, 55.9% (95% CI, 39–72), and 85.7% (95% CI, 70–100). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 27 (79%), and 18 (86%) patients, with 3 (9%), and 1 (5%) grade 3 adverse events in cohort-1 and -2, respectively. Immunohistochemical quantification of intra- and peritumoral CD3+ T cells and CD20+ B cells, but not PD-1/PD-L1 staining, correlated significantly with RFS. Conclusions: One year of adjuvant low-dose nivolumab could be an effective and economically advantageous alternative for standard dosing, at the condition of further confirmation in a larger patient cohort. A shorter low-dose nivolumab plus ipilimumab regimen seems inferior and less tolerable.

Patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) have an increased lifetime risk for the development of nervous system tumors, including high-grade gliomas (glioblastoma). NF1 is associated with the loss of expression of neurofibromin 1 (NF1 gene product). This hyperactivates the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, leading to cellular proliferation and survival. MEK-inhibitor monotherapy is a promising treatment strategy in this setting, but is associated with distinct adverse events, most prominently cutaneous toxicity. We report the case of a young NF1 patient with a recurrent, heavily pretreated mesencephalic glioblastoma who was treated with the MEK-inhibitor trametinib (2 mg once daily). A partial response was documented, but unfortunately, he developed dose-limiting cutaneous toxicity (rash, paronychia). Based on interim results of a phase 2 trial in advanced BRAFV600 wild-type melanoma indicating that a low dose of the BRAF-inhibitor dabrafenib is able to counter trametinib-related cutaneous toxicity, dabrafenib 50 mg twice daily was added. The cutaneous adverse events gradually recovered after addition of dabrafenib to trametinib. The patient eventually achieved a durable complete response, has excellent tolerance of his treatment and remains fully active.

Background The use of immunomodulating therapy to treat various cancers has been on the rise and these immune checkpoint inhibitors are known to cause ocular side effects. In this article a case of acute exudative polymorphous vitelliform maculopathy (AEPVM) is reported which developed during a first line treatment with pembrolizumab. Case presentation A 54-year-old woman was referred because of blurry vision in both eyes with a yellow spot in the central visual field of the left eye. These symptoms started after four treatments with pembrolizumab (a monoclonal antibody against the programmed cell death receptor-1) for a metastatic recurrent vaginal mucosal melanoma. Her best corrected visual acuity was 10/10 in both eyes with a correction of + 2.00 bilaterally. There were no inflammatory findings in the anterior segment or the vitreous. Fundoscopy revealed an attenuation of the foveal reflex with subtle yellow-white subretinal macular deposits (vitelliform lesions) in both eyes. Fluorescein angiography did not show staining or leakage in the mid-phase, neither a late staining. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of the macula illustrated bilateral neurosensory retinal detachment with a thick, highly reflective band at the outer photoreceptor segment. En face structural OCT at the level of the photoreceptors showed focal areas of increased signal corresponding to hyperreflective vitelliform material. The treatment with pembrolizumab was ceased immediately. During the following visits we slowly saw an improvement of the neurosensory retinal detachment. After almost four months a total resolution of the subretinal fluid was visualized in both eyes without the use of additional treatment, though the vitelliform deposits persisted. Conclusions The development of AEPVM in melanoma patients could be triggered by treatment with Pembrolizumab. Pembrolizumab has the potential to disturb indirectly the retinal pigment epithelium homeostasis with accumulation of lipofuscin deposits and subretinal fluid, both signs of AEPVM.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) as biomarker for the early diagnosis of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the adjuvant setting, and its potential correlation with relapse-free survival (RFS). Prospectively collected data from 72 melanoma patients treated with adjuvant ICIs were pooled. CRP values at diagnosis of 10 irAEs were descriptively analysed. Correlations between RFS and the occurrence of irAEs, the grade of the irAE, the extent of CRP-elevation and the use of corticosteroids for irAE treatment were investigated. A total of 191 irAEs (grade 1/2, n = 182; grade 3/4, n = 9) occurred in 64 patients [skin toxicity (n = 70), fatigue (n = 50), thyroiditis (n = 12), musculoskeletal toxicity (n = 11), sicca syndrome (n = 10), other (n = 23), pneumonitis (n = 6), colitis (n = 4), hepatitis (n = 3) and hypophysitis (n = 2)]. In pneumonitis and hypophysitis, the median CRP levels at diagnosis exceeded the upper limit of normal (ULN, 5 mg/L). After a median follow-up of 26.5 months, 28 patients (39%) had been diagnosed with a melanoma relapse. Patients who experienced no irAE were at the highest risk for relapse (P = 0.008). A trend was observed for patients diagnosed with an irAE that was associated with an elevated CRP (>2xULN) to be at higher risk for relapse as compared to those diagnosed with an irAE and CRP

Treatment with combined BRAF and MEK inhibition is widely accepted as a first-line treatment option for patients with advanced BRAF V600E mutant melanoma. It is generally well-tolerated and has limited side-effects. However, we report a case of a sarcoid-like syndrome induced by treatment with dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) in a patient with stage IV-M1d melanoma. Sarcoid-like syndrome is a known side-effect of immune checkpoint-inhibition therapy but has only rarely been described in BRAF/MEK inhibition. However, recognizing this side-effect is important because of potential misinterpretation as progressive disease and influence on treatment. We describe a 48-year-old female patient who initially presented with solitary brain metastasis and diffuse lung lesions. She was treated with D/T to which she had an initial response in all lesions. One year later, new hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathies were detected. Imaging was suggestive of the sarcoid-like syndrome. An endoscopic biopsy of the enlarged lymph node showed no melanoma cells. Treatment was continued. Three months later, the patient experienced a drop in hemoglobin, which prompted further investigations into possible occult intestinal metastasis. Video capsule examination revealed a metastatic lesion in the small intestine. A treatment switch to the combination of checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and ipilimumab successfully treated both lung and small intestine lesions. After the third dose of this combination therapy, she developed an immune-related pneumonitis. Treatment with corticosteroids resolved the pneumonitis and decreased metabolism in the sarcoid-like syndrome. The treatment was not restarted afterward. She remains free of the disease up to today, 2.5 years after diagnosis.

Simple Summary MEK-inhibitor monotherapy has activity in advanced NRASQ61R/K/L mutant melanoma but is associated with dose-limiting cutaneous toxicity. The combination of a BRAF- with a MEK-inhibitor at their full dose (as in BRAFV600E/K mutant melanoma) has low cutaneous toxicity. We hypothesized that a low dose of the BRAF-inhibitor dabrafenib can mitigate the skin toxicity associated with a full dose of the MEK-inhibitor trametinib in patients with advanced NRASQ61R/K/L mutant melanoma who progressed after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The results of this two-stage phase 2 trial show that addition of a low dose of dabrafenib effectively mitigates the skin toxicity associated with trametinib. This combination is, however, insufficiently active in patients with advanced NRASQ61R/K/L mutant melanoma. The combination of low-dose dabrafenib plus full-dose trametinib can be of further interest for the treatment of MEK-inhibitor-sensitive tumors. Abstract Background: MEK-inhibitor monotherapy has activity in advanced NRASQ61R/K/L mutant melanoma but is associated with dose-limiting cutaneous toxicity. The combination of a BRAF- with a MEK-inhibitor at their full dose (as in BRAFV600E/K mutant melanoma) has low cutaneous toxicity. It is unknown whether a low dose of BRAF-inhibitor can mitigate the skin toxicity associated with full-dose MEK-inhibitor treatment in patients with advanced NRASQ61R/K/L mutant melanoma. Methods: This two-stage phase 2 clinical trial investigated trametinib 2 mg once daily in patients with advanced NRASQ61R/K/L mutant melanoma who were pretreated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. In case of trametinib-related cutaneous toxicity, low-dose dabrafenib (50 mg twice daily) was added to prevent recurrent cutaneous toxicity (pre-amendment). Following an amendment, trametinib was combined upfront with low-dose dabrafenib (post-amendment). Objective response rate (ORR) served as the primary endpoint. Results: All 6 patients enrolled pre-amendment developed trametinib-related cutaneous toxicity, necessitating treatment interruption. Combining trametinib with low-dose dabrafenib prevented recurrent skin toxicity thereafter. Trametinib-related skin toxicity was effectively mitigated in all 10 patients post-amendment. In all 16 included patients, the ORR and disease control rate was 6.3% (1 partial response) and 50.0%, respectively. The trial was halted after the first stage. Conclusions: Combining full-dose trametinib with low-dose dabrafenib can mitigate MEK-inhibitor-related skin toxicity but was insufficiently active in this patient population. This combination can be of further interest for the treatment of MEK-inhibitor-sensitive tumors.

Background Intratumoral (IT) myDC play a pivotal role in initiating antitumor immune responses within the tumor microenvironment. IT injection of the oncolytic virus T-VEC may lead to the release of tumor antigens and maturation signals that can be captured and processed by CD1c (BDCA-1)+/CD141 (BDCA-3)+ myDC, thereby reinvigorating the cancer immunity cycle. Methods Patients (pts) with ICI-refractory melanoma received IT injections of ≥1 non-visceral metastases with T-VEC (106 PFU/mL; max 4 mL) on day 1 followed by IT injection of CD1c (BDCA-1)+ (cohort C1) or CD1c (BDCA-1)+/CD141 (BDCA-3)+ myDC (cohort C2) on day 2. Injection of T-VEC (108PFU/mL; max 4 mL) was repeated on day 21, and Q2w thereafter. In C1, the number of CD1c (BDCA-1)+myDCs was escalated from 0.5x106, to 1x106, and 10x106 cells. In C2, pts received all isolated CD1c (BDCA-1)+/CD141 (BDCA-3)+ myDCs. Primary objectives were safety and feasibility. Immunohistochemistry (IHC), gene expression profiling (GEP), and multiplexed immunofluorescence (mIF) of baseline and on-treatment biopsies was performed. Results 13 pts were enrolled (C1: n=7 [respectively 2, 2, and 3 pts per dose-level of myDC]; C2: n=6). Pts received the predefined dose of myDCs and a median of 6 (range 3-8) T-VEC injections. Most frequent AEs were fatigue in 11 pts (85%), injection-site pain in 9 pts (69%), fever in 8 pts (62%), and chills and flu-like symptoms in 6 pts (46%). There were no G4 or G5 AEs. AEs of special interest were a G3 eosinophilia and a G2 purpuric rash at the injection-site; 2 pts (C1, dose level 3) developed a pathological complete remission that is ongoing at 24 months following treatment initiation. One pt in C2 had an unconfirmed partial response (iRECIST); a mixed response was observed in 2 pts. Responses were observed in both injected and non-injected lesions. In responder pts, infiltration of lymphocytes was observed on IHC. GEP and mIF on biopsies are ongoing. Conclusions IT co-injection of CD1c (BDCA-1)+ +/- CD141 (BDCA-3)+ myDC plus T-VEC is feasible, tolerable, and resulted in encouraging early signs of durable antitumor activity in pts with ICI-refractory melanoma. Clinical trial identification NCT03747744

Background: Pembrolizumab improves the survival of patients with advanced melanoma. A comprehensive analysis of baseline variables that predict the benefit of pembrolizumab monotherapy has not been conducted. Methods: Survival data of patients with advanced melanoma who were treated with pembrolizumab in a single university hospital were collected. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to correlate baseline clinical, laboratory, and radiologic characteristics and NanoString IO360 gene expression profiling (GEP) with survival. Results: 183 patients were included (stage IV 85.2%, WHO performance status &ge, 1 31.1%, pembrolizumab first-line 25.7%), of whom 112 underwent baseline 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging, 58 had circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assessments, and GEP was available in 27 patients. Active brain metastases, a higher number of metastatic sites, lower albumin and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), higher C-reactive protein (CRP) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, higher total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV), and higher ctDNA levels were associated with worse survival. Elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) &ge, 2ULN (upper limit of normal), CRP &ge, 10ULN, or ALC &lt, 750/mm3 delineate a subpopulation where treatment with pembrolizumab is futile. A TMTV &ge, 80 mL encompassed 17/21 patients with LDH &ge, 2ULN, CRP &ge, 750/mm3. No significant associations were observed between baseline GEP scores and survival. Conclusion: Multiple baseline variables correlate with survival on pembrolizumab. TMTV is a more comprehensive baseline biomarker than CRP, LDH, or ALC in predicting the futility of pembrolizumab.

Introduction: No standard protocol for surveillance for melanoma patients is established. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (whole-body MRI) is a safe and sensitive technique that avoids exposure to X-rays and contrast agents. This prospective study explores the use of whole-body MRI for the early detection of recurrences. Material and Methods: Patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual (seventh edition, AJCC-7) stages IIIb/c or -IV melanoma who were disease-free following resection of macrometastases (cohort A), or obtained a durable complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) following systemic therapy (cohort B), were included. All patients underwent whole-body MRI, including T1, Short Tau Inversion Recovery, and diffusion-weighted imaging, every 4 months the first 3 years of follow-up and every 6 months in the following 2 years. A total body skin examination was performed every 6 months. Results: From November 2014 to November 2019, 111 patients were included (four screen failures, cohort A: 68 patients, cohort B: 39 patients). The median follow-up was 32 months. Twenty-six patients were diagnosed with suspected lesions. Of these, 15 patients were diagnosed with a recurrence on MRI. Eleven suspected lesions were considered to be of non-neoplastic origin. In addition, nine patients detected a solitary subcutaneous metastasis during self-examination, and two patients presented in between MRIs with recurrences. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were, respectively, 58%, 98%, 58%, 98%, and 98%. Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of distant metastases was respectively 88% and 98%. No patient experienced a clinically meaningful (&gt, grade 1) adverse event. Conclusions: Whole-body MRI for the surveillance of melanoma patients is a safe and sensitive technique sparing patients&prime, cumulative exposure to X-rays and contrast media.

We report a case of anti-protein death 1-induced sarcoid-like reaction in a 63-year-old Caucasian male who was diagnosed with stage IV-M1a melanoma. He was initially treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy (Q3W) and had a complete response after 14 cycles. However, relapse was suspected 3 months later with appearance of hilar, mediastinal and hepatic hilar lymph nodes as well as a skin lesion. Biopsy of both the hilar lymph nodes and the skin lesion demonstrated sarcomatoid granulomatosis. Pembrolizumab was discontinued temporarily. While on F-FDG-PET/CT, all sarcoid-like lesions regressed in size and activity, a new hypermetabolic solitary skeletal lesion was detected in a lumbar vertebra, suspicious for metastasis. However, since the patient was asymptomatic, a watchful-waiting attitude was taken. During this period, a spontaneous and complete resolution of the metabolic activity was observed of the skeletal lesion. Until today, the patient remains in complete remission. Current case presents an atypical presentation and evolution of anti-PD-1-induced sarcoid-like reaction, illustrating the difficulty of differentiating it from disease progression. Before considering (re-)initiation of anti-melanoma therapy, a tissue biopsy of one of the suspected lesions may be performed to confirm diagnosis. Physicians treating patients with ICI should be aware of this difficulty and critically assess the nature of lesions suspect of progression in patients responding to ICI and presenting with a sarcoid-like reaction.

Purpose. To assess neurocognitive function (NCF), psychosocial outcome, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and long-term effects of immune-related adverse events (irAE) on metastatic melanoma survivors treated with ipilimumab (IPI). Methods. Melanoma survivors were identified within two study populations (N=104), at a single-center university hospital, and defined as patients who were disease-free for at least 2 years after initiating IPI. Data were collected using 4 patient-reported outcome measures, computerized NCF testing, and a semistructured interview at the start and 1-year follow-up. Results. Out of 18 eligible survivors, 17 were recruited (5F/12M); median age is 57 years (range 33-86); and median time since initiating IPI was 5.6 years (range 2.1-9.3). The clinical interview revealed that survivors suffered from cancer-related emotional distress such as fear of recurrence (N=8), existential problems (N=2), survivor guilt (N=2), and posttraumatic stress disorder (N=6). The mean EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Score was not significantly different from the European mean of the healthy population. Nine survivors reported anxiety and/or depression (Hospitalization Depression Scale) during the survey. Seven survivors (41%) reported fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale). Seven patients (41%) had impairment in NCF; only three out of seven survivors had impairment in subjective cognition (Cognitive Failure Questionnaire). Anxiety, depression, fatigue, and neurocognitive symptoms remained stable at the 1-year follow-up. All cases of skin toxicity (N=8), hepatitis (N=1), colitis (N=3), and sarcoidosis (N=1) resolved without impact on HRQoL. Three survivors experienced hypophysitis; all suffered from persistent fatigue and cognitive complaints 5 years after onset. One survivor who experienced a Guillain-Barré-like syndrome suffered from persisting depression, fatigue, and impairment in NCF. Conclusion. A majority of melanoma survivors treated with IPI continue to suffer from emotional distress and impairment in NCF. Timely detection in order to offer tailored care is imperative, with special attention for survivors with a history of neuroendocrine or neurological irAE. The trial is registered with B.U.N. 143201421920., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

2534 Background: Intravenous (IV) administration of ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) has low activity in recurrent glioblastoma (rGB). Intratumoral (IT) and intracavitary (IC) administration of IPI and NIVO is under evaluation in the GlITIpNi phase I clinical trial. Methods: Patients (pts) with resectable rGB were recruited to cohorts C1, C2 and C4; pts with non-resectable rGB were recruited in C3 (biopsy only). IT administration (brain tissue lining the resection cavity during surgery) of IPI (10 mg)(C1), or IPI (5 mg) plus NIVO (10 mg)(C2, C3 and C4), was followed by IC administration of NIVO at escalating doses of 1, 5 or 10 mg Q2w in both C3 and C4 (via an Ommaya reservoir). In all cohorts, pts received 10 mg NIVO IV Q2w (6x in C1/C2, and 12x in C3/C4). Corticosteroids were contraindicated. Results: Forty-six pts (31 male; median age 56y (38-74); IDH1 R132H mutation in 2 pts in C1/C2; NGS somatic mutation analysis for C3/C4 ongoing) with rGB following resection, RT and temozolomide were enrolled (3, 24, 13 and 6 pts in C1, C2, C3 and C4, respectively). All pts received IT administrations. Pts in C1/C2 received a median of 5 IV NIVO administrations. Study treatment has been completed in all pts in C1/C2, in 9 pts in C3, and in 3 pts in C4; pts received a median of 4 (0-10) and 3 (0-7) postoperative IC/IV administrations in C3 and C4, respectively. Two pts in C2 and 1 pt in C3 had an increased perilesional cerebral edema (G3) with neurological deterioration after surgery/IT-injection, that was reversible with steroids. Most frequent AE were fatigue (32 pts, 64%), fever (20 pts, 44%), and headache (25 pts, 50%). In 4 pts from C3, the Ommaya was removed because of bacterial colonization (asymptomatic). There were no G5 AE. There was no dose/AE correlation with increasing IC NIVO doses in C3/C4. Repetitive CSV analysis during therapy (C3/C4) revealed increased lymphocyte counts in 4 pts; scRNA- and TCR-sequencing is ongoing. Gene expression profiling for C1/C2, and pharmacokinetic analysis of NIVO and IPI in CSV for C3/C4 are ongoing. After a median FU of 62w (16-165) for pts in C1/C2, 16 pts have died; median OS is 71w (95% CI 8-134), 1- and 2y-OS% are respectively 51% (95% CI 31-71), and 34% (95% CI 10-59). OS compares favorably to a historical cohort of Belgian rGB pts (n = 469; Log-Rank p .001). After a median FU of 10w (1-37) for pts in C3/C4, 2 pts have died; median OS has not been reached. One pt in C3 achieved a PR that is ongoing at 12m. Conclusions: IT/IC administration of NIVO and IPI is feasible and sufficiently safe to warrant further investigation in pts with rGB. Clinical trial information: NCT03233152 .

Background: Preclinical and clinical data suggest MEK-inhibition (MEKi) to be effective in NRAS-mutant (mt) and NRAS wild-type (wt) melanoma. However, MEKi causes considerable cutaneous treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) which are less present if MEKi is combined with BRAFi. Methods: This open-label, dual-stratum, single-center phase 2 clinical trial investi- gated trametinib (T; 2 mg QD) in patients (pts) with advanced BRAFV600 wt, NRASQ61R/ K/L mt/wt melanoma who had progressed following or were ineligible for immune checkpoint inhibitors. In case of T-related cutaneous TRAE, low-dose dabrafenib (ld-D; 50 mg BID) was added to prevent further skin TRAE. The trial was amended in June 2019 to administer ld-D upfront with T. The primary endpoint was the confirmed objective response rate (ORR; per RECIST 1.1); secondary endpoints were progression- free and overall survival and safety. Results: Between Jan and Dec 2019, 9 pts initiated T monotherapy and 8 pts initiated T þ ld-D. TRAE were seen in 15 pts (29%G3-4; 29% SAE). One pt permanently interrupted T due to G3 pneumonitis. All 9 pts who initiated T monotherapy devel- oped G1-2 acneiform rash which resolved (to G0: 6 pts; to G1: 3 pts) with temporary interruption of T, local metronidazole therapy and subsequent addition of ld-D to T. One pt had a G1 recurrence of acneiform rash that was managed with local therapy. Of 8 pts who initiated T þ ld-D upfront, 1 developed G1 acneiform rash that resolved with local therapy only. Other TRAE are shown in the table. T dose was reduced in 4 pts for TRAE (1 pt with left ventricular ejection fraction decrease; 1 with central serous retinopathy; 1 with AST/ALT increase; 1 with hyponatremia and syncope). The unconfirmed ORR is 4/15 and the disease control rate is 7/15 evaluable pts. Conclusions: No unexpected toxicities were seen with T or T + ld-D. ld-D is able to prevent T-related skin toxicity. Thus, combining ld-D with T is a safe approach to in- crease tolerance of and optimize exposure to T. Clinical trial identification: NCT04059224; EudraCT 2018-004003-39. Legal entity responsible for the study: Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel. Funding: Novartis, Stichting tegen Kanker. Disclosure: G. Awada: Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Pfizer; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Astellas; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Novartis. J.K. Schwarze: Travel/ Accommodation/Expenses: Amgen; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck Sharp & Dohme. S. Aspeslagh: Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Amgen; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Roche; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advi- sory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Sanofi; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Novartis. B. Neyns: Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Roche; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Novartis; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: EtheRNA; Advi- sory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: CryoStorage; Research grant/Funding (institu- tion): Pfizer; Research grant/Funding (institution): Merck Serono. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.01.039

e22041 Background: Pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) improves survival in advanced melanoma (MEL). This research investigates baseline (BL) biomarkers that predict long-term benefit on PEMBRO monotherapy. Methods: Outcome data on patients (pts) with advanced cutaneous/mucosal MEL treated with PEMBRO in our institution were collected after pt consent. Responses were evaluated using the immune-related response criteria. Total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV), assessed by 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, was calculated as the sum of all tumor-associated voxels with a standardized uptake value (SUV) above the mean SUV measured in a reference region in normal liver tissue plus 3 standard deviations using Syngo.via software (Siemens Healthcare). The NanoString PanCancer IO360 panel was used for gene expression profiling (GEP). Results: A total of 196 pts was included in this analysis (median age 60; cutaneous 86%, mucosal 3%, unknown primary 12%; stage III 14%, IV-M1a/b/c 60%, IV-M1d 26%; first-line 24%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) in the population was 20.4 w (95% CI 10.2-30.7); median overall survival (OS) was 143.6 w (95% CI NR-NR). BL WHO Performance Status (PS) > 0 (HR 1.63 [95% CI 1.13-2.37]), C-reactive protein (CRP) > ULN (HR 1.92 [95% CI 1.33-2.77]), absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) < 750/mm³ (HR 2.45 [95% CI 1.32-4.55]) and > 1 metastatic site (HR 1.84 [95% CI 1.23-2.77]) were associated (P≤0.01) with worse PFS in multivariate analysis (Cox regression); BL WHO PS > 0 (HR 2.77 [95% CI 1.82-4.24]), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) > ULN (HR 1.80 [95% CI 1.16-2.79]) and > 1 metastatic site (HR 1.95 [95% CI 1.16-3.25]) were associated with worse OS (P≤0.011). BL TMTV data were available in 118 pts (60%): BL CRP > ULN (HR 1.83 [95% CI 1.13-2.96]), ALC < 750/mm³ (HR 2.49 [95% CI 1.02-6.08]), > 1 metastatic site (HR 1.71 [95% CI 1.04-2.82]) and BL corticosteroid use (HR 4.62 [95% CI 1.38-15.45]) were associated with worse PFS (P < 0.05). BL WHO PS > 0 (HR 2.82 [95% CI 1.57-5.08]), ALC < 750/mm³ (HR 2.62 [95% CI 1.06-6.51]), history of brain metastases (HR 2.59 [95% CI 1.37-4.91]) and TMTV > 80 mL (HR 3.56 [95% CI 1.82-6.95]) were all associated with worse OS (P≤0.038). GEP data on a representative BL tumor sample were available in 27 pts (14%). Higher apoptosis signature scores were associated with increased probability of OS (HR 0.45 [95% CI 0.33-0.73], P < 0.01). Conclusions: BL TMTV > 80 mL identifies a subgroup of advanced MEL pts with worse outcome on PEMBRO. Increased apoptosis gene signature scores in a subset of patients predict increased OS.

INTRODUCTION Intravenous (iv) administration of PD-1 blocking mAb is largely ineffective for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (rGB). Combination of iv-ipilimumab (IPI) plus nivolumab (NIVO) is associated with a high incidence of irAE. Intracerebral (ic) administration of immune-checkpoint inhibiting mAb following the resection of rGB could be a more effective and safer alternative to iv-dosing. METHODS Patients underwent maximal safe resection of their rGB followed by ic-injection of 10mg IPI (cohort-1) or 5mg IPI plus 10mg NIVO (cohort-2) in the wall of the resection cavity. In both cohorts 10mg nivolumab was administered iv for a max of 6 doses, starting 1 day pre-operatively. RESULTS 21 pts were included (3 in C-1, 18 in C-2; 8F/13M; median age 56y [range 38–72]; 17 de novo GB, 4 secGB). All patients underwent maximal safe surgical resection followed by ic-injection of IPI and NIVO as planned. Median number of iv-administrations of NIVO was 5 (range 1–8). Treatment was generally well tolerated. Postoperatively, 2 patients experienced a G3 symptomatic increase in perilesional cerebral edema with neurological deterioration, reversible upon steroid treatment. One patient had worsening neurological symptoms related to an inflammatory intracerebral cyst at the resection site, requiring surgical decompression 4 months post-study treatment. Most frequent AEs were fatigue (2pts G3, 8pts G2), postoperative fever (11pts G1) and headache (3pts G2); 1pt developed G3 pneumonitis. No other immune-related AEs or treatment-related deaths occurred. After median follow-up of 60 weeks, median PFS is 14.4 weeks (95% CI 11.2–17.6); 11/21 patients are alive, and 1- and 2y-OS% are respectively 46% (95% CI 19- 73%), and15% (95% CI 0–42%). CONCLUSION This is the first study demonstrating the safety and activity of combined surgical resection of rGB with local intracerebral administration of immune checkpoint-inhibiting mAb. Survival compares favorably to historical controls justifying further investigation of this experimental therapy.

Purpose of review The therapeutic armamentarium for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer has evolved considerably over the past years. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death-1 such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab or programmed cell death ligand 1 such as atezolizumab, durvalumab and avelumab have shown favorable efficacy results in this patient population in the first-line and second-line setting. These immunotherapies are associated with a distinct toxicity profile based on autoimmune organ toxicity which is a new challenge for supportive care during treatment with these drugs. Recent findings The differential diagnosis of events occurring during immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment is broad: they can be due to immune-related or nonimmune-related adverse events, atypical tumor responses (pseudoprogression or hyperprogression) or events related to comorbidities or other treatments. Summary The management of these patients includes a thorough baseline clinical, biological and radiologic evaluation, patient education, correct follow-up and management by a multidisciplinary team with a central role for the medical oncologist. Immune-related toxicities should be managed according to available guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Intracerebral (iCE) administration of nivolumab (NIVO) and ipilimumab (IPI) after resection of recurrent glioblastoma (rGB), followed by repeated intravenous(IV) NIVO was recently shown to be feasible, safe and associated with encouraging survival. Subsequent cohorts were defined to investigate the addition of biweekly intracavitary (iCA) or intrathecal (iTH) NIVO +/- IPI administrations. METHODS Four groups were defined according to rGB resectability and postoperative treatment schedule. Group A and D underwent biopsy, B and C maximal safe resection. All patients received iCE injections of 10 mg/1ml NIVO + 5 mg/1ml IPI at the end of surgery, after which an Ommaya catheter was implanted iCA (A, B and C) or iTH (D). Following surgery, all patients received biweekly IV low-dose NIVO(10mg) combined with iCA/iTH 10 mg NIVO (A and B) + 1, 5 or 10 mg IPI (C and D) for up to 24 weeks. NIVO/IPI concentrations were dosed in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Gene sequencing and RNA gene expression profiling were performed on all tissue samples RESULTS 39pts(27 male; 16 in A, 16 in B, 4 in C, 3 in D; recruitment ongoing in C+D) were enrolled. All patients received the predefined dose of iCE IPI/NIVO. Most frequent AEs were fatigue (n=30), headache (n=19), confusion (n=14), dysphasia (n=13), and fever (n=10). Ommaya infection occurred in 5patients, subacute neurological deterioration requiring corticosteroids in 6patients. There were no G5 AEs. irAEs were infrequent and mild. Median PFS and OS were 5w(95% CI 1-8) and 23w(95% CI 0-53) in A and 13w(95% CI 7-19) and 42w(95% CI 30-54) in B, respectively. >90% of CSF samples had elevated protein levels and lymphocytic pleocytosis. There was no evidence for accumulation of NIVO/IPI in the CSF. CONCLUSION Repeated intracavitary or intrathecal administration of NIVO +/- IPI in rGB is feasible and safe. Favourable survival outcome is seen in patients amenable to surgical resection.

INTRODUCTION: Left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) is an infrequent but significant side effect of certain molecular-targeted cancer therapies and may lead to treatment modification and impact on disease prognosis. There may be a role for beta blockers (BB), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) in the prevention of LVD. Areas covered: There are multiple definitions for LVD based on clinical and/or imaging features. Molecular-targeted therapies cause reversible LVD. Therapies with well-reported LVD are inhibitors of human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), angiogenesis, Abelson murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog (ABL) and the proteasome. BB, ACEI and ARB seem to have a role in the prevention of LVD associated with anthracyclines. Few trials have investigated the role of BB, ACEI and ARB as primary prevention of LVD in molecular-targeted therapies. Their results are not conclusive but a beneficial role cannot be excluded. Expert opinion: Because of inconclusive data, future interventional studies should not include all treated patients with molecular-targeted therapy, but focus on patients at risk for developing LVD. Another option is to study patients who show early signs of LVD to prevent progression to overt heart failure.

Background Patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) have a poor prognosis with a median overall survival (OS) of 30-39 weeks in prospective clinical trials. Intravenous administration of programmed cell death protein 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors has low activity in patients with rGB. In this phase I clinical trial, intracerebral (IC) administration of ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) in combination with intravenous administration of NIVO was investigated. Methods Within 24 hours following the intravenous administration of a fixed dose (10 mg) of NIVO, patients underwent a maximal safe resection, followed by injection of IPI (10 mg; cohort-1), or IPI (5 mg) plus NIVO (10 mg; cohort-2) in the brain tissue lining the resection cavity. Intravenous administration of NIVO (10 mg) was repeated every 2 weeks (max. five administrations). Next generation sequencing and RNA gene expression profiling was performed on resected tumor tissue. Results Twenty-seven patients were enrolled (cohort-1: n=3; cohort-2: n=24). All patients underwent maximal safe resection and planned IC administrations and preoperative NIVO. Thirteen patients (cohort-1: n=3; cohort-2: n=10) received all five postoperative intravenous doses of NIVO. In cohort-2, 14 patients received a median of 3 (range 1-4) intravenous doses. Subacute postoperative neurological deterioration (n=2) was reversible on steroid treatment; no other central nervous system toxicity was observed. Immune-related adverse events were infrequent and mild. GB recurrence was diagnosed in 26 patients (median progression-free survival (PFS) is 11.7 weeks (range 2-152)); 21 patients have died due to progression. Median OS is 38 weeks (95% CI: 27 to 49) with a 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year OS-rate of, respectively, 74.1% (95% CI: 57 to 90), 40.7% (95% CI: 22 to 59), and 27% (95% CI: 9 to 44). OS compares favorable against a historical cohort (descriptive Log-Rank p>0.003). No significant difference was found with respect to PFS (descriptive Log-Rank test p>0.05). A higher tumor mRNA expression level of B7-H3 was associated with a significantly worse survival (multivariate Cox logistic regression, p>0.029). Conclusion IC administration of NIVO and IPI following maximal safe resection of rGB was feasible, safe, and associated with encouraging OS. Trial registration NCT03233152., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

9529 Background: The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway can be activated by alternative driver mutations in BRAFV600/ NRASQ61R/K/L wild-type (wt) melanoma. MEK-inhibitor monotherapy has activity in BRAFV600/ NRASQ61R/K/L wt melanoma, but is associated with considerate skin toxicity. Skin toxicity associated with the MEK-inhibitor trametinib (T) can be effectively mitigated by adding a low dose (50 mg BID) of the BRAF-inhibitor dabrafenib (LD-D) (Awada et al. Ann Oncol 2020). Methods: This two-stage, single-center phase 2 trial investigated T 2 mg QD in patients (pts) with advanced BRAFV600/ NRASQ61R/K/L wt melanoma who previously progressed on treatment with checkpoint inhibitors. In case of dose-limiting T-related skin toxicity, LD-D (50 mg BID) was added to T (pre-amend). The trial was amended in June 2019 to administer T upfront with LD-D (post-amend). Objective response rate (ORR, by RECIST v1.1) served as the primary endpoint. A Simon’s two-stage optimal design was used (p0 0.10; p1 0.30; alpha 0.05; power 0.80): in case of > 1 OR in the first 10 pts, 19 additional pts would be included in stage 2. The trial is considered positive if > 5 OR are observed. Results: As of February 9, 2021, 16 pts (3 pre-amend; 13 post-amend) were included (median age 56.5; male 56.3%; stage IIIB 6.3%, IV-M1a-c 68.8%, IV-M1d 25.0%; ECOG performance status 0-1 93.8%; normal lactate dehydrogenase 56.3%). Median duration of follow-up is 17.9 weeks (wks; range 1.9-90.1). The ORR in 14 evaluable pts is 42.9% (5 confirmed and 1 unconfirmed partial response), the disease control rate is 71.4%. Four OR are ongoing after a median follow-up of 8.0 wks (range 0.0-77.0), 2 responding pts progressed on therapy after respectively 16.6 and 24.0 wks. Four out of 6 OR are observed in pts with MAPK-pathway activating mutations (3 class II BRAF and 1 GNAQ mutation). Eight pts (50.0%) have progressed (median progression-free survival 16.4 wks [95% confidence interval [CI] 6.9-25.9]); 4 pts (25.0%) have died (median overall survival 54.7 wks [95% CI 37.6-71.8]). Adverse events (AE) are observed in all pts (grade [G] 3-4 9 [56.3%]). Two pre-amend pts added on LD-D due to dose-limiting T-related skin toxicity; no clinically relevant T-related skin toxicity was observed post-amend with the upfront addition of LD-D. The most frequent AE were creatine kinase increase (G1-2 11 [68.8%]; G3-4 1 [6.3%]), and anemia and acneiform rash (both G1-2 7 [43.8%]; G3-4 0). Therapy was temporarily interrupted due to AE in 11 pts (68.8%) and permanently interrupted in 1 pt (6.3%) due to recurrent pneumonitis. Conclusions: In this two-stage phase 2 trial, T plus LD-D was found to have promising antitumor activity and acceptable toxicity in pts with advanced pretreated BRAFV600/ NRASQ61R/K/L wt melanoma, especially in the presence of identifiable somatic MAPK-pathway activating mutations. Clinical trial information: NCT04059224.

Brain metastases (BMs) are representing a new challenge for the oncologist; their incidence is increasing due to the better overall survival and systemic disease control in many malignancies, consequent to new potent cytotoxic and targeted therapies. In the era of immunotherapies, checkpoint inhibitors are representing a new therapeutic option in different solid tumors and settings; preliminary results showed potential activity of these agents in patients with BM, when administered as single agent or in combination with radiation therapy. After presenting the arguments in favor of this new strategy, we reported the preliminary results of the trials evaluating these agents in BM, we described the ongoing trials and we discussed the potential role of these agents in the BM treatment.

INTRODUCTION Intravenous (iv) administration of PD-1 blocking mAb is largely ineffective for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (rGB). Combination of iv-ipilimumab (IPI) plus nivolumab (NIVO) is associated with a high incidence of irAE. Intracerebral (ic) administration of immune-checkpoint inhibiting mAb following the resection of rGB could be a more effective and safer alternative to iv-dosing. METHODS Patients underwent maximal safe resection of their rGB followed by ic-injection of 10mg IPI (cohort-1) or 5mg IPI plus 10mg NIVO (cohort-2) in the wall of the resection cavity. In both cohorts 10mg nivolumab was administered iv for a max of 6 doses, starting 1 day pre-operatively. RESULTS 21 pts were included (3 in C-1, 18 in C-2; 8F/13M; median age 56y [range 38–72]; 17 de novo GB, 4 secGB). All patients underwent maximal safe surgical resection followed by ic-injection of IPI and NIVO as planned. Median number of iv-administrations of NIVO was 5 (range 1–8). Treatment was generally well tolerated. Postoperatively, 2 patients experienced a G3 symptomatic increase in perilesional cerebral edema with neurological deterioration, reversible upon steroid treatment. One patient had worsening neurological symptoms related to an inflammatory intracerebral cyst at the resection site, requiring surgical decompression 4 months post-study treatment. Most frequent AEs were fatigue (2pts G3, 8pts G2), postoperative fever (11pts G1) and headache (3pts G2); 1pt developed G3 pneumonitis. No other immune-related AEs or treatment-related deaths occurred. After median follow-up of 60 weeks, median PFS is 14.4 weeks (95% CI 11.2–17.6); 11/21 patients are alive, and 1- and 2y-OS% are respectively 46% (95% CI 19- 73%), and15% (95% CI 0–42%). CONCLUSION This is the first study demonstrating the safety and activity of combined surgical resection of rGB with local intracerebral administration of immune checkpoint-inhibiting mAb. Survival compares favorably to historical controls justifying further investigation of this experimental therapy.

Background: Treatment with anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies improves the survival of metastatic melanoma patients but only a subgroup of patients benefits from durable disease control. Predictive biomarkers for durable benefit could improve the clinical management of patients. Methods: Plasma samples were collected from patients receiving anti-PD1 therapy for ctDNA quantitative assessment of BRAF V600 and NRAS Q61/G12/G13 mutations. Results: After a median follow-up of 84 weeks 457 samples from 85 patients were analyzed. Patients with undetectable ctDNA at baseline had a better PFS (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.47, median 26 weeks versus 9 weeks, p = 0.01) and OS (HR = 0.37, median not reached versus 21.3 weeks, p = 0.005) than patients with detectable ctDNA. Additionally, the HR for death was lower after the ctDNA level became undetectable during follow-up (adjusted HR: 0.16 (95% CI 0.07-0.36), p-value < 0.001). ctDNA levels > 500 copies/ml at baseline or week 3 were associated with poor clinical outcome. Patients progressive exclusively in the central nervous system (CNS) had undetectable ctDNA at baseline and at subsequent assessments. In multivariate analysis adjusted for LDH, CRP, ECOG and number of metastatic sites, the ctDNA remained significant for PFS and OS. A positive correlation was observed between ctDNA levels and total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV), number of metastatic sites and total tumor burden. Conclusions: Assessment of ctDNA baseline and during therapy was predictive for tumor response and clinical outcome in metastatic melanoma patients and reflected the tumor burden. ctDNA evaluation provided reliable complementary information during anti-PD1 antibody therapy., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the evolution of health-related quality of Life (HRQoL), emotional burden, and neurocognitive function in the first-generation metastatic melanoma survivors treated with pembrolizumab. Methods: Survivors were defined as patients who achieved a durable remission for at least 6 months after initiating pembrolizumab in a single-center observational study (N = 141). A semi-structured interview was performed at baseline. Neurocognitive computerized testing and patient-reported outcomes were collected at 4 time points to assess HRQoL using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the HADS to assess anxiety and depression. Results: Out of 35 eligible patients, 25 were recruited and completed baseline assessment (18 female; median age 58 years [range 28–86]; 24 completed the 1-year follow-up phase. Median time since diagnosis was 30 months (range 12–84); median time since initiation of pembrolizumab was 19 months (range 6–42). At all visits, survivors reported a significantly lower global HRQoL, lower physical, emotional, cognitive, role, and social functioning compared with the European Mean of the healthy population. Fifteen patients (64%) had clinical levels of anxiety/depression at one time point during follow-up. The clinical interview revealed that 12 patients (48%) suffered from Cancer-Related-Post-Traumatic-Stress disorder, of whom 7 (28%) developed transient suicidal ideation, 1 patient made a suicide attempt. Neurocognitive testing revealed cognitive impairment in 8 patients (32%). Conclusions: Metastatic melanoma survivors, treated successfully with pembrolizumab, are at risk for suffering from emotional distress and neurocognitive impairment with a persistent impact on their HRQOL. Timely detection in order to offer tailored care is indicated., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

De voorbije jaren is het therapeutische arsenaal van de medisch oncoloog uitgebreid met de komst van de immuuncheck- pointinhibitoren. Deze monoklonale antilichamen gericht tegen cy- totoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (ipilimumab), programmed cell death protein 1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) of programmed death-ligand 1 (atezolizumab, durvalumab, avelumab) ontremmen de lichaamseigen immuunrespons tegen de kankercel. De indicaties voor behandeling met deze antilichamen nemen gestaag toe. Im- muuncheckpointinhibitoren hebben een specifiek toxiciteitsprofiel, met name immuungerelateerde inflammatoire orgaanbeschadiging, hetgeen een uitdaging vormt tijdens de behandeling met deze genees- middelen. De differentiaaldiagnose van nadelige gebeurtenissen die optreden tijdens de behandeling met immuuncheckpoint inhibito- ren is breed: deze kunnen immuungerelateerde inflammatoire of niet-inflammatoire bijwerkingen zijn, atypische tumorresponsen (pseudo- of hyperprogressie) of nadelige gebeurtenissen verbonden aan comorbiditeit of concomitante behandelingen, zo ook tijdens de behandeling van therapiegerelateerde bijwerkingen met corticostero- iden of immunosuppressiva. Het beleid van deze patiënten omvat een grondig klinisch, biologisch en radiologisch onderzoek voor aanvat- ten van de behandeling, correcte informatie en educatie van de pati- ent, regelmatige follow-up en snelle diagnose en behandeling van een nadelige gebeurtenis, vaak in samenwerking met andere geneeskun- dige disciplines, maar met een centrale rol voor de medisch oncoloog. Immuungerelateerde bijwerkingen dienen behandeld te worden volgens bestaande nationale en internationale richtlijnen.

Background: Intravenous (IV) administration of IPI and NIVO has low activity in patients (pts) with recurrent glioblastoma (rGB). IT administration of IPI and NIVO was safe in cohort C1 and C2 of the GlITIpNi phase I clinical trial (Schwarze et al. ASCO 2020, abstract #2534). In C3 and C4, IT administration of IPI and NIVO was followed by repeated IC and IV administrations of NIVO. Method(s): Pts with resectable rGB were recruited in C4; pts with non-resectable rGB in C3 (biopsy only). IT administration (in the brain tissue lining the resection cavity) of IPI (5 mg) plus NIVO (10 mg), was followed by IC-NIVO (through an Ommaya reservoir) at a dose of 1, 5 or 10 mg Q2w plus IV-NIVO (10mg) Q2w (max 12x). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was collected prior to each drug administration for biochemical/cytological analysis, and concentration measurements of IPI and NIVO. NGS (RNA/DNA) was performed on resected tissue. Result(s): 32 pts (23 male; med age 55y [38-77]; IDH1 R132H mutation [n=2], 1p/19q LOH [n=1]) diagnosed with rGB were enrolled (C3 [n=17], C4 [n=15]). After a median FU of 37w (1-82w), study treatment is ongoing in 2 pts. All pts received the predefined IT dose of IPI and NIVO. Median number of IC/IV NIVO administrations in C3 and C4 were respectively 5 [1-12] and 4 [1-12]. Most frequent AEs were fatigue (n=27), headache (n=17), fever (n=9), and seizures (n=5). Bacterial colonization of the Ommaya reservoir requiring removal and antibiotic therapy occurred in 4 pts. There were no G5 AEs. In C3, 1 pt has an ongoing PR after 83w (best response was PD in all other 15 evaluable pts); 11 pts have died (due to PD; median OS is 38w [95% CI 9-61]). In C4, 3 pts remain relapse-free after 30, 31 and 32w; 5 pts have died (all due to PD; median OS not reached). In 5 (C3) and 6 (C4) pts, elevated protein levels as well as lymphocytic pleocytosis were documented. There was no evidence for accumulation of NIVO in the CSF during therapy. Cytokine, cfDNA analysis of CSF and NGS on tumor tissue are ongoing. Conclusion(s): IT administration of NIVO and IPI followed by IC/IV administration of NIVO was feasible and sufficiently safe to warrant further investigation in pts with rGB. Clinical trial identification: NCT03233152. Legal entity responsible for the study: Department of Medical Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel. Funding(s): Stichting Tegen Kanker. Disclosure: J.K. Schwarze: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Amgen. G. Awada: Research grant/Funding (institution): Pfizer; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Novartis; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Astellas. B. Neyns: Research grant/Funding (institution): Roche; Advisory/Consultancy: Bristol Myers Squibb; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Advisory/Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy: EtheRNA; Advisory/Consultancy: CryoStorage; Research grant/Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant/Funding (institution): Merck-Serono. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.Copyright © 2020 European Society for Medical Oncology

INTRODUCTION: Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) overexpression is present in 20% of breast cancer patients. It is associated with more aggressive disease and worse clinical outcome. New drugs are thus needed. Approved and future treatments will be discussed in this review. AREAS COVERED: The monoclonal antibodies trastuzumab and pertuzumab, the tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib and the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzmab emtansine are approved for HER2 positive breast cancer. The combination of trastuzumab, pertuzumab and docetaxel is currently the first-line treatment in the metastatic setting. New therapies are still needed due to frequent relapse and resistance. These include mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, heat shock protein 90 inhibitors, pan-HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, immunotherapy agents (antibodies and vaccines), radioimmunotherapy and HER2 specific affinity proteins. Possible developmental issues are the complexity of the molecular biology of the HER2 positive cancer cell, the occurrence of resistance, toxicity and the high cost. EXPERT OPINION: The determination of the right sequence of use of old and new therapies remains a challenging issue. The selection of patients who do or don't benefit from potentially toxic chemotherapy is also difficult. Central nervous system metastases are a common problem in HER2 positive breast cancer that needs to be addressed in future trials.