Search

Glutamate is essential for learning and memory processes, and acute and chronic exposures to ethanol (or protracted abstinence) alter glutamatergic transmission. In the current study, we investigated the effects of VU-29, positive allosteric modulator of metabotropic glutamate 5 (mGlu5) receptor, on the acute ethanol- and ethanol withdrawal-induced impairment of novel object recognition (NOR) task in rats. The influence of VU-29 (30 mg/kg) on memory retrieval was measured (a) at 4-h delay after acute ethanol administration, as well as (b) after acute withdrawal (24 and 48 h) of repeated (2.0 g/kg, once daily for 7 days) ethanol administration. Additionally, the effects of VU-29 on expression of mGlu5 and mGlu2 receptor proteins in the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and striatum were determined 48 h after ethanol withdrawal. Our results indicated that VU-29, given before acute ethanol administration, prevented the ethanol-induced impairments in spatial memory retrieval. Furthermore, VU-29 given before the testing session on the first day of abstinence facilitated NOR performance in ethanol-withdrawn rats at 4- and 24-h delay after administration. Our ELISA results show that VU-29 normalized ethanol withdrawal induced increase in expression of mGlu5 receptor protein in the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and striatum, as well as expression of mGlu2 receptor protein in the hippocampus. Thus, results from our study indicate that positive modulation of mGlu5 receptor prevented and reversed ethanol-induced memory impairment. Moreover, mGlu5 (hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and striatum) and mGlu2 (hippocampus) receptors play an important role in the ethanol-induced recognition memory impairment induced by ethanol withdrawal.

Repeated exposure to and withdrawal from ethanol induces deficits in spatial reversal learning. Data indicate that metabotropic glutamate 5 (mGlu5) receptors are implicated in synaptic plasticity and learning and memory. These receptors functionally interact with N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, and activation of one type results in the activation of the other. We examined whether (S)-(4-fluorophenyl)(3-(3-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl)-piperidin-1-yl (ADX-47273), a positive allosteric modulator (PAM) of mGlu5 receptor, attenuates deficits in reversal learning induced by withdrawal (11-13days) from 'binge-like' ethanol input (5.0g/kg, i.g. for 5days) in the Barnes maze (a spatial learning) task in rats. We additionally examined the effects of ADX-47273 on the expression of the NMDA receptors subunit, GluN2B, in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, on the 13th day of ethanol withdrawal. Herein, withdrawal from repeated ethanol administration impaired reversal learning, but not the probe trial. Moreover, ADX-47273 (30mg/kg, i.p.) given prior to the first reversal learning trial for 3days in the Barnes maze, significantly enhanced performance in the ethanol-treated group. The 13th day of ethanol abstinence decreased the expression of the GluN2B subunit in the selected brain regions, but ADX-47273 administration increased it. In conclusion, positive allosteric modulation of mGlu5 receptors recovered spatial reversal learning impairment induced by withdrawal from 'binge-like' ethanol exposure. Such effect seems to be correlated with the mGlu5 receptors mediated potentiation of GluN2B-NMDA receptor mediated responses in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Thus, our results emphasize the role of mGlu5 receptor PAM in the adaptive learning impaired by ethanol exposure., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Kissorphin (KSO) is a new peptide derived from kisspeptin-10. This peptide possesses neuropeptide FF (NPFF)-like biological activity in vitro; NPFF, in many cases, inhibits opioid and ethanol effects in rodents. Therefore, the current study explored the influence of KSO on acute ethanol- and morphine-induced hyperactivity, and on the development and expression of locomotor sensitization induced by these drugs. In the present study, sensitization to locomotor effects was induced by repeated exposure to ethanol (2.4 g/kg, intraperitoneally [i.p.], 1 × 4 days) or morphine (10 mg/kg, subcutaneously [s.c.], 1 × 7 days). We found that KSO (1-10 nmol/300 μL, intravenously [i.v.]) did not have an impact on locomotor activity of naïve mice. However, it reduced both acute ethanol- (10 nmol/300 μL) and morphine-induced hyperactivity (3 and 10 nmol/300 μL). Pretreatment of animals with KSO (10 nmol/300 μL), before every ethanol or morphine injection during development of sensitization or before the ethanol or morphine challenge, attenuated the development, as well as the expression of locomotor sensitization to both substances. Moreover, prior administration of the NPFF receptor antagonist RF9 (10 nmol/300 μL, i.v.) inhibited the ability of KSO (10 nmol/300 μL) to reduce the expression of ethanol and morphine sensitization. KSO given alone, at all used doses, did not influence the motor coordination measured via the rotarod test. The results from this study show that KSO effectively attenuated acute and repeated effects of ethanol and morphine. Thus, KSO possesses NPFF-like anti-opioid activity in these behavioral studies., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Current studies indicate that the cholinergic and opioid systems interact to modulate pain. In the present work, we investigated the influence of the cholinesterase inhibitors, donepezil (0.5; 1 or 3mg/kg, i.p.) and rivastigmine (0.03; 0.5 or 1mg/kg, i.p.), on the acute antinociceptive effects of morphine (5mg/kg, i.p.) in the hot plate test in mice. Herein, both inhibitors were found to enhance and prolong the analgesic effects of morphine without affecting latencies themselves. In an extension of this work, we determined which cholinergic receptors subtype mediates the enhancement of analgesic effects of morphine, following inhibition of cholinesterases. In this part of the study, scopolamine (0.5mg/kg, i.p.), a muscarinic cholinergic receptors antagonist, but not mecamylamine (3mg/kg, i.p.), a nicotinic cholinergic receptors antagonist, reversed the enhancing effects of donepezil (3mg/kg, i.p.) and rivastigmine (1mg/kg, i.p.) on the morphine antinociception. Moreover, both cholinesterase inhibitors attenuated the development of tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of morphine. In contrast, acute administration of donepezil (3mg/kg, i.p.) or rivastigmine (1mg/kg, i.p.) on the day of expression of tolerance, had no effect on the already developed morphine tolerance. What is more, in both set of experiments, rivastigmine was slightly more potent than donepezil due to the broader inhibitory spectrum of this drug on acetylcholine degradation. Thus, our results suggest that the cholinesterase inhibitors, donepezil and rivastigmine, may be administered with morphine in order to enhance the latter's analgesic effects for the treatment of acute and chronic pain., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Central cholinergic dysfunction contributes to acute spatial memory deficits produced by ethanol administration. Donepezil and rivastigmine elevate acetylcholine levels in the synaptic cleft through the inhibition of cholinesterases-enzymes involved in acetylcholine degradation. The aim of our study was to reveal whether donepezil (acetylcholinesterase inhibitor) and rivastigmine (also butyrylcholinesterase inhibitor) attenuate spatial memory impairment as induced by acute ethanol administration in the Barnes maze task (primary latency and number of errors in finding the escape box) in rats. Additionally, we compared the influence of these drugs on ethanol-disturbed memory. In the first experiment, the dose of ethanol (1.75 g/kg, i.p.) was selected that impaired spatial memory, but did not induce motor impairment. Next, we studied the influence of donepezil (1 and 3 mg/kg, i.p.), as well as rivastigmine (0.5 and 1 mg/kg, i.p.), given either before the probe trial or the reversal learning on ethanol-induced memory impairment. Our study demonstrated that these drugs, when given before the probe trial, were equally effective in attenuating ethanol-induced impairment in both test situations, whereas rivastigmine, at both doses (0.5 and 1 mg/kg, i.p.), and donepezil only at a higher dose (3 mg/kg, i.p.) given prior the reversal learning, attenuated the ethanol-induced impairment in cognitive flexibility. Thus, rivastigmine appears to exert more beneficial effect than donepezil in reversing ethanol-induced cognitive impairments-probably due to its wider spectrum of activity. In conclusion, the ethanol-induced spatial memory impairment may be attenuated by pharmacological manipulation of central cholinergic neurotransmission., Competing Interests: Compliance with ethical standards All experimental protocols and housing conditions were approved by the Local Ethics Committee and carried out according to the National Institute of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the European Community Council Directive of November 2010 for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Directive 2010/63/EU) and were approved by the Local Ethics Committee.

The present study examined the influence of the cholinesterase inhibitors donepezil (a selective inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase) and rivastigmine (also an inhibitor of butyrylcholinesterase) on the acquisition and reinstatement of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) in rats. Before the CPP procedure, animals received a single injection of ethanol (0.5 g/kg, 10% w/v, intraperitoneally [i.p.]) for 15 days. The ethanol-induced CPP (biased method) was developed by four injections of ethanol (0.5 g/kg, 10% w/v, i.p.) every second day. Control rats received saline instead of ethanol. Donepezil (0.5, 1 or 3 mg/kg, i.p.) or rivastigmine (0.03, 0.5 or 1 mg/kg, i.p.) were administered before ethanol during conditioning or before the reinstatement of ethanol-induced CPP. The cholinesterase inhibitors were equally effective in increasing (dose dependently) the acquisition of ethanol-induced CPP. Furthermore, priming injections of both inhibitors reinstated (cross-reinstatement) the ethanol-induced CPP with similar efficacy. These effects of both cholinesterase inhibitors were reversed by mecamylamine (3 mg/kg, i.p.), a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist, but not by scopolamine (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.), a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist. Thus, our results show that the cholinergic system is involved in the reinforcing properties of ethanol, and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors play an important role in the relapse to ethanol-seeking behaviour., (© The Author(s) 2016.)

The aim of the present study was to determine whether a new cyclic analog of enkephalin, cyclo[N(ε),N(β)-carbonyl-d-Lys(2),Dap(5)] enkephalinamide (cUENK6), a preferential μ-(MORs), and, to a lower extent, a δ-opioid receptor (DORs) agonist in vitro, could reinstate ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP). In our work, male Wistar rats were first conditioned either with ethanol (10% w/v, 0.5g/kg, intraperitoneally (i.p.)) or 0.9% NaCl in a biased CPP procedure. The intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of DORs antagonist (naltrindole, 2.5 and 5nmol) or MORs antagonist (β-funaltrexamine, 5 and 10nmol), but not the κ opioid receptor (KORs) antagonist (norbinaltorphimine, 5 and 10nmol) was then administered and inhibited the expression of ethanol-induced CPP. After the extinction session, i.c.v. administration of cUENK6 at the dose of 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5nmol occurred, and was found to reinstate the ethanol-induced CPP similar to that of the priming injection of ethanol. However, the reinstated effect of cUENK6 (0.25nmol) was strongly abolished by administration of naltrindole and, to lesser extent, by β-funaltrexamine. Furthermore, the preferential MORs agonist-morphine (13nmol, i.c.v.) and the DORs agonist-[Leu(5)]-enkephalin (2.7 and 5.4nmol, i.c.v.) also reinstated the ethanol-induced CPP. cUENK6 given alone at the dose of 0.25nmol before the testing phase had no effect in animals that received 0.9% NaCl during the conditioning phase and also did not influence their locomotor activity. These data suggest that the effects of cUENK6 did not have an impact on the results obtained in the reinstatement procedure of CPP. Overall, the data support the idea that both MORs and DORs are normally involved in the expression and reinstatement of ethanol conditioned seeking behavior - as indexed by CPP in rats., (Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

An analog of enkephalin, cyclo[N(ε),N(β)-carbonyl-D-Lys(2),Dap(5)] enkephalinamide (cUENK6), is predominantly a functional agonist of μ-opioid receptors (MOPr) and, to a lesser extent, of δ-opioid receptors (DOPr) in vitro. The aim of the present study was to determine whether cUENK6 could affect ethanol withdrawal-induced anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze (EPM) test in rats. An anxiety-like effect of withdrawal was predicted to occur in the EPM test 24 h after the last ethanol administration (2 g/kg, intraperitoneally [i.p.]; 15% w/v once daily for 9 days). Ethanol withdrawal decreased the percent of time spent by rats in the open arms and the percent of open-arms entries. cUENK6 (0.25 nmol), given by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection, significantly reversed these anxiety-like effects of ethanol withdrawal and elevated the percent of time spent by rats in the open arms and the percent of open-arms entries. These effects of cUENK6 were significantly inhibited by the DOPr antagonist naltrindole (NTI) (5 nmol, i.c.v.), but not by the MOPr antagonist β-funaltrexamine (β-FNA) (5 nmol, i.c.v.). The preferential DOPr agonist [Leu(5)]-enkephalin (LeuEnk) (2.7 and 5.4 nmol, i.c.v.) and the MOPr agonist morphine (6.5 and 13 nmol, i.c.v.) reduced the anxiety-like effects of ethanol withdrawal. cUENK6 at the dose of 0.25 nmol did not disturb locomotor activity in the EPM, in contrast to cUENK6 at the dose of 0.5 nmol, and morphine at 6.5 and 13 nmol. However, similarly to LeuEnk, cUENK6 induced the anxiolytic-like effects in naïve rats. Thus, our study suggests that cUENK6 reduced ethanol withdrawal-induced anxiety-like behavior by activation of δ-opioid receptors rather than μ-opioid receptors., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

NPFF precursor, pro-NPFF(A) contains three known bioactive sequences: NPFF (FLFQPQRF-NH(2)), neuropeptide AF (NPAF; AGEGLSSPFWSLAAPQRF-NH(2)) and neuropeptide SF (NPSF; SLAAPQRF-NH(2)). The key-feature of these fragments is their common PQRF-amidated sequence at their C termini. Here, we evaluated the biological activity of two other sequences derived from the mouse NPFF(A) precursor, that does not have PQRF-amidated C-terminus. One peptide was residing between positions 85 and 99 in the mice pro-NPFF(A). This peptide was referred to as neuropeptide SA (NPSA; SAWGSWSKEQLNPQA), assigned due to its flanking amino acids. Another sequence used in the experiments was N-terminal fragment of NPSA, here referred to as neuropeptide SS (NPSS; SAWGSWS). These two peptides, classified as crypteins, were synthesized and tested in the hot-plate and tail immersion tests in mice for their pharmacological activity in morphine-induced antinociception. The effects of both crypteins were compared to NPFF. Our experiments indicated that both crypteins inhibited morphine antinociception and their effects were reversed by RF9, an antagonist of NPFF receptors. These data show that NPSA and NPSS possess NPFF-like anti-opioid activity in these behavioral tests., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the δ-opioid receptors are involved in the rewarding and reinstatement effect of cocaine in the conditioned place preference (CPP) test. Male Wistar rats were conditioned with cocaine (5 mg/kg) or saline in a biased CPP procedure. The intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of naltrindole (5 nmol), δ-opioid receptor antagonist but not β-funaltrexamine (5 nmol), or nor-binaltorphimine (10 nmol), μ-opioid and κ-opioid receptor antagonists, respectively reversed the expression of the cocaine CPP. The i.c.v. administration of new analogues of deltorphins with potent agonist activity at δ-opioid receptors, such as cyclo(N, N-carbonyl-D-Orn, Orn)deltorphin (DEL-6) at the dose of 10 and 20 nmol and deltorphin II N-(ureidoethyl)amide (DK-4) at the dose of 10 and 20 nmol reinstated the rewarding effect of cocaine after extinction sessions in the CPP test. Naltrindole (5 nmol, i.c.v.) abolished the reinstated effect of DK-4 (10 nmol). In addition, DEL-6 and DK-4 induce anxiolytic-like effects in the elevated plus-maze test. However, neither peptide given alone either produced a rewarding effect in the CPP test, or influenced the locomotor activity and motor coordination, thus suggesting that these effects of peptides did not influence the results obtained in the reinstatement procedure of CPP. In conclusion, our results show that δ-opioid receptors play a dominant role in cocaine reward and reinstatement of cocaine seeking behavior in the CPP test.

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the newly synthesized analog of enkephalin, cyclo[N(epsilon),N(beta)-carbonyl-D-Lys(2), Dap(5)] enkephalinamide (cUENK6), a highly potent mu- (guinea pig ileum assay) and delta-receptors (mouse vas deferens assay) ligand, induces an antinociceptive effect in the hot-plate test and tail-immersion test after intracerebroventricular administration. Our study indicated that this peptide at the dose of 0.25 nmol produced comparable but at the dose of 0.5 nmol stronger than morphine (13 nmol), antinociceptive effect in both tests. Furthermore, rats with developed tolerance to morphine indicated cross-tolerance to antinociceptive effects of cUENK6. The antinociceptive effects of cUENK6 and morphine were inhibited by non-selective opioid receptor antagonist--naloxone. More detailed study indicated that the delta-opioid receptor antagonist - naltrindole very strongly and, to the lower extent, mu-opioid antagonist - beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA), inhibited antinociceptive effect of cUENK6 in the tail-immersion test. Nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI), a kappa-opioid receptor antagonist, did not influence this effect. These data suggest the dominant role of delta-opioid receptors as compared with mu-receptors in mediation antinociceptive effect of cUENK6. Furthermore, we found that cUENK6 is much more effective in inhibiting pain in the hot-plate (ED(50)=0.0792 nmol) than in the tail-immersion (ED(50)=0.3526 nmol) test. However, cUENK6 at the antinociceptive doses induced hypolocomotion, and although this effect is observed after administration of opioid agonists in rats as a one phase of their biphasic action (inhibition followed by activation), in our study it was not naloxone-reversible. Therefore, our study suggests that not only opioid receptors may be involved in behavioral effects of cUENK6.