Search

Chemotherapy; Non–small cell lung cancer; RET inhibitors Quimioteràpia; Càncer de pulmó de cèl·lules no petites; Inhibidors de RET Quimioterapia; Cáncer de pulmón de células no pequeñas; Inhibidores de RET Introduction Nearly 1% to 2% of NSCLCs harbor RET fusions. Characterization of this rare population is still incomplete. Methods This retrospective multicenter study included patients with any-stage RET positive (RET+) NSCLC from 31 cancer centers. Molecular profiling included DNA/RNA sequencing or fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses. Clinicobiological features and treatment outcomes (per investigator) with surgery, chemotherapy (CT), immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs), CT-ICB, multityrosine kinase inhibitors, and RET inhibitors (RETis) were evaluated. Results For 218 patients included between February 2012 and April 2022, median age was 63 years, 56% were females, 93% had adenocarcinoma, and 41% were smokers. The most frequent fusion partner was KIF5B (72%). Median tumor mutational burden was 2.5 (range: 1–4) mutations per megabase, and median programmed death-ligand 1 expression was 10% (range: 0%–55%). The most common metastatic sites were the lung (50%), bone (43%), and pleura (40%). Central nervous system metastases were found at diagnosis of advanced NSCLC in 21% of the patients and at last follow-up or death in 31%. Overall response rate and median progression-free survival were 55% and 8.7 months with platinum doublet, 26% and 3.6 months with single-agent CT, 46% and 9.6 months with CT-ICB, 23% and 3.1 months with ICB, 37% and 3 months with multityrosine kinase inhibitor, and 76% and 16.2 months with RETi, respectively. Median overall survival was longer in patients treated with RETi versus no RETi (50.6 mo [37.7–72.1] versus 16.3 mo [12.7–28.8], p < 0.0001). Conclusions Patients with RET+ NSCLC have mainly thoracic and bone disease and low tumor mutational burden and programmed death-ligand 1 expression. RETi markedly improved survival, whereas ICB may be active in selected patients. Writing assistance was provided by Mrs. Sarah Mackenzie. Dr. Marinello was the recipient for the grant for DUERTECC/EURONCO (Diplôme Universitaire Européen de Recherche Translationnelle Et Clinique en Cancérologie). Dr. Mezquita received support from the Contrato Juan Rodes 2020 (ISCIII, Ministry of Health); Ayuda de la Acción Estratégica en Salud-ISCIII FIS 2021 (PI21/01653); Ayuda SEOM-Juan Rodés 2020. Dr. Cortellini acknowledges the support from the National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre. Dr. Pinato acknowledges the support from the Wellcome Trust Strategic Fund (PS3416), Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro MFAG Grant ID 25697), National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, and the Imperial College Tissue Bank.

Aim: To retrospectively characterize real-world therapeutic strategies, clinical outcomes and attrition rates with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), before first-line osimertinib approval, in EGFR-mutated advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer patients in Greece. Results: Among 160 patients, the discontinuation rate for first-line first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs was 85%; among these patients, 43% did not receive any second-line therapy and 9.4% died during an 18.7-month follow-up period. Median progression-free and overall survival were 12.1 and 20.9 months, respectively. Osimertinib was offered as second- and third-line treatment in 69.6 and 21.7% of patients with the T790M mutation, respectively. Brain metastases were recorded in 10.6% of patients during treatment, with median overall survival of 4.9 months. Conclusion: Given the high attrition rates and the impact of CNS progression, offering the most appropriate first-line EGFR-TKI treatment with CNS penetration is key to maximize outcomes.

Molecular modifiers of KRAS G12C inhibitor (KRAS G12Ci) efficacy in advanced KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC are poorly defined. In a large unbiased clinico-genomic analysis of 424 NSCLC patients, we identified and validated co-alterations in KEAP1, SMARCA4 and CDKN2A as major independent determinants of inferior clinical outcomes with KRAS G12Ci monotherapy. Collectively, co-mutations in these three tumor suppressor genes segregated patients into distinct prognostic subgroups and captured ~50% of those with early disease progression (PFS≤3 months) with KRAS G12Ci. Pathway-level integration of less prevalent co-alterations in functionally related genes nominated PI3K/AKT/MTOR pathway and additional baseline RAS gene alterations, including amplifications, as candidate drivers of inferior outcomes with KRAS G12Ci, and revealed a possible association between defective DNA damage response/repair and improved KRAS G12Ci efficacy. Our findings propose a framework for patient stratification and clinical outcome prediction in KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC that can inform rational selection and appropriate tailoring of emerging combination therapies.

Introduction: Patients with thoracic malignancies are at increased risk for mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and a large number of intertwined prognostic variables have been identified so far. Methods: Capitalizing data from the Thoracic Cancers International COVID-19 Collaboration (TERAVOLT) registry, a global study created with the aim of describing the impact of COVID-19 in patients with thoracic malignancies, we used a clustering approach, a fast-backward step-down selection procedure, and a tree-based model to screen and optimize a broad panel of demographics and clinical COVID-19 and cancer characteristics. Results: As of April 15, 2021, a total of 1491 consecutive eligible patients from 18 countries were included in the analysis. With a mean observation period of 42 days, 361 events were reported with an all-cause case fatality rate of 24.2%. The clustering procedure screened 73 covariates in 13 clusters. A further multivariable logistic regression for the association between clusters and death was performed, resulting in five clusters significantly associated with the outcome. The fast-backward step-down selection procedure then identified the following seven major determinants of death: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group—performance status (ECOG-PS) (OR = 2.47, 1.87–3.26), neutrophil count (OR = 2.46, 1.76–3.44), serum procalcitonin (OR = 2.37, 1.64–3.43), development of pneumonia (OR = 1.95, 1.48–2.58), C-reactive protein (OR = 1.90, 1.43–2.51), tumor stage at COVID-19 diagnosis (OR = 1.97, 1.46–2.66), and age (OR = 1.71, 1.29–2.26). The receiver operating characteristic analysis for death of the selected model confirmed its diagnostic ability (area under the receiver operating curve = 0.78, 95% confidence interval: 0.75–0.81). The nomogram was able to classify the COVID-19 mortality in an interval ranging from 8% to 90%, and the tree-based model recognized ECOG-PS, neutrophil count, and c-reactive protein as the major determinants of prognosis. Conclusions: From 73 variables analyzed, seven major determinants of death have been identified. Poor ECOG-PS was found to have the strongest association with poor outcome from COVID-19. With our analysis, we provide clinicians with a definitive prognostication system to help determine the risk of mortality for patients with thoracic malignancies and COVID-19.

Giannis Mountzios,1 Sofia Lampaki,2 Georgia-Angeliki Koliou,3 Athanassios Vozikis,4 Ioannis Kontogiorgos,4 Panagiotis Papantoniou,4 Margarita-Ioanna Koufaki,4 Eleni Res,5 Anastasios Boutis,6 Athina Christopoulou,7 Nicoleta Pastelli,8 Anastasios Grivas,9 Gerasimos Aravantinos,10 Efthalia Lalla,11 Georgios Oikonomopoulos,12 Anna Koumarianou,13 Dionisios Spyratos,2 Dimitrios Bafaloukos Snr,14 Georgios Rigakos,15 Pavlos Papakotoulas,6 George Fountzilas,16– 18 Helena Linardou19 1Fourth Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Trials Unit Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece; 2Pulmonary Department, Lung Cancer Oncology Unit, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, G. Papanicolaou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; 3Section of Biostatistics, Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group, Athens, Greece; 4Laboratory of Health Economics and Management, Department of Economics, University of Piraeus, Piraeus, Greece; 5Third Department of Medical Oncology, Agii Anargiri Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece; 6First Department of Clinical Oncology, Theagenio Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; 7Medical Oncology Unit, S. Andrew Hospital, Patras, Greece; 8Department of Pathology, G. Papanicolaou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; 9Second Department of Internal Medicine, Agios Savvas Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece; 10Second Department of Medical Oncology, Agii Anargiri Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece; 11Third Department of Clinical Oncology, Theagenio Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; 12Second Department of Medical Oncology, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece; 13Hematology-Oncology Unit, Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; 14First Department of Medical Oncology, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece; 15Third Department of Medical Oncology, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece; 16Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; 17Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; 18Department of Medical Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus; 19Fourth Oncology Department, Metropolitan Hospital, Athens, GreeceCorrespondence: Giannis MountziosFourth Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Trials Unit, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Messoghion Av. 107, Athens, 11526, GreeceTel +2106972000Email gmountzios@gmail.comPurpose: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the preferred first-line option for patients with advanced, EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Afatinib, a second-generation irreversible EGFR-TKI, has been extensively used in Greece in this setting; however, real-world data regarding molecular epidemiology and financial implications of afatinib use are lacking.Materials and Methods: This was an observational, non-interventional, multicenter, retrospective cohort study, based on real-world data collected from the medical charts/records of patients treated with afatinib between 15/03/2015 and 25/06/2020 and were recorded on a web-based data capture system. Cox models were used to assess the prognostic significance of clinicopathological parameters with respect to clinical outcomes of interest. Cost analysis was conducted from a public third-payer perspective, and only direct medical costs reimbursed by the payer were considered.Results: A total of 59 patients were treated with afatinib for their EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC; the median age was 61 years (range: 37– 91). Performance status was zero in 61%, and brain metastases were present in 13.6%. Forty-four patients (74.6%) had a deletion in exon 19 only, while nine (15.3%) had a mutation in exon 21, 8 of them in L858R and one in L861Q. At a median follow-up of 41.8 months (95% CI 35.9– 51.4), the median PFS was 14.3 months (95% CI 12.2– 16.4), and the median OS was 29 months (95% CI 25.6– 33.4). Corresponding values for patients with deletion 19 only were 14.3 months (95% CI 11.5– 18.5) and 28.1 months (95% CI 21.1– 32.6), respectively. The mean expenditure for the treatment of each patient equals € 25,333.68; with € 21,865.06 being attributed to drug acquisition costs, € 3325.35 to monitoring costs and € 143.27 to adverse event treatment-related costs.Conclusion: Long-term data in the real-world setting in Greece confirm activity, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of afatinib as first-line treatment of patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC.Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04640870.Keywords: lung cancer, epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR, afatinib, molecular epidemiology, cost-effectiveness

Targeted therapies have revolutionized the treatment and improved the outcome for oncogene-driven NSCLC and an increasing number of oncogenic driver therapies have become available. For MET-dysregulated NSCLC (especially MET exon 14 skipping mutations and MET-amplifications, which is one of the most common bypass mechanisms of resistance in oncogene-addicted NSCLC), several anti-MET-targeted therapies have been approved recently (MET exon 14 skipping mutation) and multiple others are in development. In this narrative review, we summarize the role of MET as an oncogenic driver in NSCLC, discuss the different testing methods for exon 14 skipping mutations, gene amplification, and protein overexpression, and review the existing data and ongoing clinical trials regarding targeted therapies in MET-altered NSCLC. As immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy has become the standard of care for advanced NSCLC, immunotherapy data for MET-dysregulated NSCLC are put into perspective. Finally, we discuss future challenges in this rapidly evolving landscape.

Background: Irreversible allosteric KRAS p.G12C inhibitors (KG12Ci) such as sotorasib and adagrasib have revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of advanced KG12C-mutant NSCLC, however individual responses are heterogeneous and curtailed by innate and adaptive/acquired resistance. Molecular determinants of KG12Ci efficacy in NSCLC are poorly defined. We dissected the impact of major KG12C co-mutations and explored the effects of less prevalent co-alterations on the clinical activity of KG12Ci in the largest treated cohort to date of patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC. Key findings were validated in preclinical KG12C NSCLC models. Methods: Baseline clinico-genomic features and clinical outcome data from pts with stage IV KG12C NSCLC (ECOG PS 0-2) treated with single-agent KG12Ci were collected retrospectively from 20 centers in the US and Europe. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS and differences were assessed with the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% CI were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model stratified for clinical co-variates. The impact of selected co-alterations on sotorasib efficacy was assessed in syngeneic (C57BL/6) KG12C NSCLC models. Results: 411 eligible pts were included in the study. Median age was 68 years, 77% of pts had received both platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-(L)1 inhibitors and 35% had brain metastases. 83% of pts received sotorasib. ORR with KG12Ci was 32.4% (95% CI, 27.9-37.1), PFS was 5.1m (95% CI, 4.5-5.6) and OS was 10.2m (95% CI, 8.4-12.1). Co-alterations in KEAP1, SMARCA4 and CDKN2A/B were each associated with significantly shorter PFS (KEAP1: 2.8m vs 5.5m, HR 2.50, P Conclusions: Co-mutations in KEAP1, SMARCA4 and CDKN2A/2B define subgroups of KG12C NSCLC pts with markedly distinct outcomes with KG12Ci monotherapy. Tailoring of KG12C inhibitor-anchored therapeutic strategies and patient stratification should take into account the co-mutation status of individual tumors. Citation Format: Marcelo V. Negrao, Haniel A. Araujo, Giuseppe Lamberti, Alissa J. Cooper, Teng Zhou, Neal Akhave, Lukas Delasos, J Kevin Hicks, Mihaela Aldea, Gabriele Minuti, Jacobi Hines, Jacqueline V. Aredo, Michael J. Dennis, Turja Chakrabarti, Susan Scott, Paolo Bironzo, Matthias Scheffler, Petros Christopoulos, So Yeon Kim, Sarah Goldberg, Ying Ni, Blerina Resuli, Lorenza Landi, Shu-Chi Tseng, Mizuki Nishino, Dwight Owen, Collin Blakely, Giannis Mountzios, Catherine A. Shu, Christine Bestvina, Marina Garassino, Kristen Marrone, Jhanelle Gray, Sandip Pravin Patel, Amy L. Cummings, Heather A. Wakelee, Jurgen Wolf, Giorgio V. Scagliotti, Federico Cappuzzo, Fabrice Barlesi, Pradnya Patil, Don L. Gibbons, Funda Meric-Bernstam, J Jack Lee, John V. Heymach, David S. Hong, Rebecca S. Heist, Mark M. Awad, Ferdinandos Skoulidis. Molecular determinants of KRAS p.G12C inhibitor efficacy in advanced NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3431.

Objectives: We retrospectively analysed patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring high PD-L1 expression (>50%) and treated with front-line pembrolizumab, comparing outcom...

Background The mechanism of action of bevacizumab and erlotinib is quite different in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study sought to compare the two targeted therapies in terms of sequential tumor response metrics. Patients and methods Parameters of radiological tumor response evaluation were assessed at baseline and periodically in 58 patients receiving either bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (N=25) or erlotinib (N=33). Results Bevacizumab-treated patients had lower longest diameter at best response compared to the erlotinib group (p=0.011). The longest diameter, tumor volume and density significantly decreased from baseline to best response for the entire cohort and bevacizumab-treated patients; no difference was found in the erlotinib group. Conclusion Treatment with bevacizumab substantially improved tumor metrics between baseline and each cycle of treatment, as well as between baseline and best response, in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Simple Summary Pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma are aggressive diseases mostly diagnosed at an advanced and inoperable stage. This review presents the value of next-generation sequencing (NGS) when performed on small biopsies—including fine-needle aspiration/biopsy samples, brushings, pancreatic juice and bile, and also blood—in the field of pancreatobiliary neoplasia. NGS could guide physicians while evaluating pancreatic solid and cystic lesions or suspicious biliary strictures, performing surveillance in high-risk individuals, or monitoring the disease and assessing prognosis in already diagnosed cancer patients. Evidence suggests that NGS performed on small biopsies is a robust tool for the diagnosis and pre-operative risk stratification of pancreatic and biliary lesions, whereas it also carries significant prognostic and therapeutic value. However, effective standardization of the pre-analytical and analytical assay parameters used for each clinical scenario is needed to fully implement NGS into routine practice and provide more personalized management in patients with suspected or established pancreatobiliary neoplasia. Abstract Pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma are lethal diseases mainly diagnosed at an inoperable stage. As pancreatobiliary surgical specimens are often unavailable for further molecular testing, this review aimed to highlight the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic impact of next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed on distinct small biopsies, including endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspirations and biopsies of pancreatic solid and cystic lesions, biliary duct brushings, and also “liquid biopsies” such as the pancreatic juice, bile, and blood. NGS could clarify indeterminate pancreatic lesions or biliary strictures, for instance by identifying TP53 or SMAD4 mutations indicating high-grade dysplasia or cancer. It could also stratify pancreatic cystic lesions, by distinguishing mucinous from non-mucinous cysts and identifying high-risk cysts that should be excised in surgically fit patients, whereas the combination of cytology, elevated cystic CEA levels and NGS could improve the overall diagnostic accuracy. When NGS is performed on the pancreatic juice, it could stratify high-risk patients under surveillance. On the plasma, it could dynamically monitor the disease course and response to therapy. Notably, the circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels have been associated with staging, grading, and survival. Lastly, NGS has shown potential in identifying potentially actionable molecular alterations. In conclusion, NGS applied on small biopsies could carry significant diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic value.

Data on the effectiveness and safety of approved SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in cancer patients are limited. This observational, prospective cohort study investigated the humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in 232 cancer patients from 12 HeCOG-affiliated oncology departments compared to 100 healthcare volunteers without known active cancer. The seropositivity rate was measured 2–4 weeks after two vaccine doses, by evaluating neutralising antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein using a commercially available immunoassay. Seropositivity was defined as ≥33.8 Binding-Antibody-Units (BAU)/mL. A total of 189 patients and 99 controls were eligible for this analysis. Among patients, 171 (90.5%) were seropositive after two vaccine doses, compared to 98% of controls (p = 0.015). Most seronegative patients were males (66.7%), &gt, 70-years-old (55.5%), with comorbidities (61.1%), and on active treatment (88.9%). The median antibody titers among patients were significantly lower than those of the controls (523 vs. 2050 BAU/mL, p &lt, 0.001). The rate of protective titers was 54.5% in patients vs. 97% in controls (p &lt, 0.001). Seropositivity rates and IgG titers in controls did not differ for any studied factor. In cancer patients, higher antibody titers were observed in never-smokers (p = 0.006), women (p = 0.022), &lt, 50-year-olds (p = 0.004), PS 0 (p = 0.029), and in breast or ovarian vs. other cancers. Adverse events were comparable to registration trials. In this cohort study, although the seropositivity rate after two vaccine doses in cancer patients seemed satisfactory, their antibody titers were significantly lower than in controls. Monitoring of responses and further elucidation of the clinical factors that affect immunity could guide adaptations of vaccine strategies for vulnerable subgroups.

Background Data on the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with concurrent autoimmune diseases (AID) are limited. Methods We performed a retrospective multicenter review of medical records of patients with cancer and underlying AID who received ICI. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results Among 123 patients with pre-existing AID who received ICI, the majority had been diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, 68.3%) and melanoma (14.6%). Most patients had a rheumatologic (43.9%), or an endocrine disorder (21.1%). Overall, 74 (60.2%) patients experienced an immune-related adverse event (irAE) after ICI initiation, AID flare (25.2%), or new irAE (35%). Frequent irAEs included thyroiditis, dermatitis and colitis. ICI was permanently discontinued due to unacceptable (8.1%) or fatal (0.8%) toxicity. In patients with NSCLC, corticosteroid treatment at the initiation of immunotherapy was associated with poor PFS (HR = 2.78, 95% CI 1.40–5.50, p = 0.003). The occurrence of irAE was associated with increased PFS (HR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.25–0.92, p = 0.026). Both parameters maintained their independent prognostic significance. Conclusions ICI in patients with cancer and pre-existing AID is associated with manageable toxicity that infrequently requires treatment discontinuation. However, since severe AID flare might occur, expected ICI efficacy and toxicity must be balanced. Clinical trial identifier NCT04805099

Simple Summary Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of lung cancer cases, with few patients carrying driver mutations in the gene encoding for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Advances in translational research have established EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as the standard first-line therapy for NSCLC patients with activating EGFR mutations. The aim of our observational study was to assess the frequency of T790M acquired resistance and predictors of its presence, in patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who have progressed in the first-line EGFR-TKI treatment setting with first- or second-generation TKIs and have undergone molecular testing in tissue and/or plasma biopsy. The study highlights the challenges of performing tissue re-biopsy in routine care settings, which can lead to patients considered non-eligible for certain therapies from which they can benefit, and merits further actions from the healthcare community, in order to establish re-biopsy as a standard procedure. Abstract Background: Real-world data on the molecular epidemiology of EGFR resistance mutations at or after progression with first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs in patients with advanced NSCLC are lacking. Methods: This ongoing observational study was carried out by 23 hospital-based physicians in Greece. The decision to perform cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2 in tissue and/or plasma at disease progression was made before enrollment. For patients with negative/inconclusive T790M plasma-based results, tissue re-biopsy could be performed. Results: Ninety-six (96) eligible patients were consecutively enrolled (median age: 67.8 years) between July-2017 and September-2019. Of the patients, 98% were tested upon progression using plasma and 2% using tissue/cytology biopsy. The T790M mutation was detected in 16.0% of liquid biopsies. Tissue re-biopsy was performed in 22.8% of patients with a T790M-negative plasma result. In total, the T790M positivity rate was 21.9%, not differing between patients on first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI. Higher (≥2) ECOG performance status and longer (≥10 months) time to disease progression following EGFR-TKI treatment initiation were associated with T790M positivity. Conclusions: Results from plasma/tissue-cytology samples in a real-world setting, yielded a T790M positivity rate lower than previous reports. Fewer than one in four patients with negative plasma-based testing underwent tissue re-biopsy, indicating the challenges in routine care settings.

Purpose: To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/American Society of Hematology (ASH) recommendations for use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in patients with cancer. Methods: PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses of RCTs in patients with cancer published from January 31, 2010, through May 14, 2018. For biosimilar ESAs, the literature search was expanded to include meta-analyses and RCTs in patients with cancer or chronic kidney disease and cohort studies in patients with cancer due to limited RCT evidence in the cancer setting. ASCO and ASH convened an Expert Panel to review the evidence and revise previous recommendations as needed. Results: The primary literature review included 15 meta-analyses of RCTs and two RCTs. A growing body of evidence suggests that adding iron to treatment with an ESA may improve hematopoietic response and reduce the likelihood of RBC transfusion. The biosimilar literature review suggested that biosimilars of epoetin alfa have similar efficacy and safety to reference products, although evidence in cancer remains limited. Recommendations: ESAs (including biosimilars) may be offered to patients with chemotherapy-associated anemia whose cancer treatment is not curative in intent and whose hemoglobin has declined to < 10 g/dL. RBC transfusion is also an option. With the exception of selected patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, ESAs should not be offered to most patients with nonchemotherapy-associated anemia. During ESA treatment, hemoglobin may be increased to the lowest concentration needed to avoid transfusions. Iron replacement may be used to improve hemoglobin response and reduce RBC transfusions for patients receiving ESA with or without iron deficiency. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines and www.hematology.org/guidelines.

Resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in advanced mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) constitutes a therapeutic challenge. This review intends to summarize the existing knowledge about the mechanisms of resistance to TKIs in the context of EGFR mutant NSCLC and discuss its clinical and therapeutic implications. EGFR-dependent and independent molecular pathways have the potential to overcome or circumvent the activity of EGFR-targeted agents including the third-generation TKI, osimertinib, negatively impacting clinical outcomes. CNS metastases occur frequently in patients on EGFR-TKIs, due to the inability of first and second-generation agents to overcome both the BBB and the acquired resistance of cancer cells in the CNS. Newer-generation TKIs, TKIs targeting EGFR-independent resistance mechanisms, bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates or combinations of TKIs with other TKIs or chemotherapy, immunotherapy and Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors (anti-VEGFs) are currently in use or under investigation in EGFR mutant NSCLC. Liquid biopsies detecting mutant cell-free DNA (cfDNA) provide a window of opportunity to attack mutant clones before they become clinically apparent. Overall, EGFR TKIs-resistant NSCLC constitutes a multifaceted therapeutic challenge. Mapping its underlying mutational landscape, accelerating the detection of resistance mechanisms and diversifying treatment strategies are essential for the management of the disease.

Introduction: RET fusions (RET+) are identified in nearly 1% of advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC). We evaluated characteristics and outcomes of patients (pts) with RET+ aNSCLC. Methods: This is an international, multicenter, retrospective study evaluating clinical, biological, pathological and radiological data of pts with RET+ aNSCLC. Objective response rates (ORR), duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated under double or single agent chemotherapy (CT), immunotherapy (ICI), CT-ICI, multityrosine kinase inhibitors (MTKi) and RET inhibitors (RETi). Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the start of first line therapy and compared between pts treated or not by RETi, after stratification by number of treatment lines. Results: A total of 71 pts was included from 11 centers. Median age was 60 [IQR 47-69], 58% were female, 93% had adenocarcinoma, 2 pts (3%) had squamous and 2 (3%) neuroendocrine carcinoma, 38 (53.5%) were tobacco consumers (median 18.5 PY [7.8-31.3]), 50 (70%) had stage IV disease at diagnosis. Fusion partners were KIF5B (35/49, 71%), CCDC6 (9/49, 18%), others (5/49, 10%). Median TMB was 2.76 [2.0-8.5], median PD-L1 5% [0-29]. The most frequent co-mutation was TP53 (18/58 cases, 31%). Median number of metastatic sites was 2 [1-3], most commonly lung (48%), bone (45%), pleura (41%) and nodes (35%). Brain metastases were found in 18% of cases at diagnosis and in 31% at last follow-up or death. Table reports outcomes by treatment. mOS was 50.6 months [95%CI 37.6 - NR]. Fifty-two pts received 1st generation RETi. The use of RETi improved OS in pts treated with ≤2 lines of therapy (NR vs 17.8 months, p=0.024) and in those receiving >2 lines (50.6 vs 12.7 months, p=0.0037). Pts responding to ICI had a median PD-L1 of 85% [15.5-90]. Conclusions: Pts with RET+ aNSCLC have mainly thoracic and bone disease. Despite smoking history, median TMB and PD-L1 expression are low. ICI may have a significant activity in selected cases. RETi improve OS. Outcomes by treatment First use of Doublet CT (N=46) Single agent CT (N=12) CT-ICI (N=9) ICI (N=19) MTKi (N=9) RETi (N=52) Line of treatment (median, range) 1 [1-1] 2 [2-3] 1 [1-2] 2 [2-3] 3 [1.5-3.5] 2 [1-3] ORR (N,%) 25/40 (62.5%) 3/12 (25%) 3/9 (33%) 7/17 (41%) 4/8 (50%) 36/45 (80%) mPFS (months, 95%CI) 7.89 [6.18-14] 2.81 [2.43-NR] 5.62 [2.79-NR] 3.71 [2.99-11.5] 2.76 [1.51-NR] 24.7 [16.2-NR] mDOR (months,95%CI) 11.83 [7.06-15.6] 8.90 [4.21-NR] 14.47 [10.25-NR] 20.47 [11.3-NR] 8.18 [1.64-NR] 24.74 [17.12-NR] Stopped for toxicity (N,%) 7/46 (15%) 1/12 (8%) 2/9 (22%) 4/18 (22%) 1/9 (11%) 14/50 (28%) Citation Format: Mihaela Aldea, Arianna Marinello, Wael Zrafi, Fabrizio Tabbo, Florian Guisier, Damien Vasseur, Vincent Fallet, Clarisse Audigier-Valette, Laura Mezquita, Antonio Calles, Giannis Mountzios, Marco Tagliamento, Judith Raimbourg, Safae Terrisse, Silvia Novello, Maria-Rosa Ghigna, Fabrice Barlesi, David Planchard, Benjamin Besse. RET-MAP: An international multi-center study of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and RET fusions [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 4019.

Background: Real-world data on the molecular epidemiology of EGFR resistance mutations at or after progression with first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs in patients with advanced NSCLC are lacking. Methods: This ongoing observational study was carried out by 23 hospital-based physicians in Greece. The decision to perform Cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2 in tissue and/or plasma at disease progression was made before enrollment. For patients with negative/inconclusive T790M plasma-based results, tissue re-biopsy could be performed. Results: Ninety-six (96) eligible patients were consecutively enrolled (median age: 67.8 years) between July-2017 and September-2019. Of the patients, 98% were tested upon progression using plasma and 2% using tissue/cytology biopsy. The T790M mutation was detected in 16.0% of liquid biopsies. Tissue re-biopsy was performed in 22.8% of patients with a T790M-negative plasma result. In total, the T790M positivity rate was 21.9%, not differing between patients on first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI. Higher (≥2) ECOG performance status and longer (≥10 months) time to disease progression following EGFR-TKI treatment initiation were associated with T790M positivity. Conclusions: Results from plasma/tissue-cytology samples in a real-world setting, yielded a T790M positivity rate lower than previous reports. Fewer than one in four patients with negative plasma-based testing underwent tissue re-biopsy, indicating the challenges in routine care settings.

The current evidence on the role of pembrolizumab for patients with extensive SCLC is reviewed in this article. Particularly, preclinical and clinical data from phase I/II and III clinical trials, which evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of pembrolizumab for these patients, are summarized based on PubMed/MEDLINE search and relevant articles. In addition, future perspectives on the emerging role of immunotherapy for SCLC are highlighted in light of potentially useful biomarkers.Pembrolizumab shows an excellent toxicity profile in recent studies, and significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS) in the phase III clinical trial KN604, in contrast to atezolizumab and durvalumab. The latter two agents have already been approved and incorporated in the daily clinical practice. Further research should be conducted so that phase III clinical trials can validate the potential clinical benefit of this checkpoint inhibitor in combination with other active agents and establish its role in the metastatic setting of SCLC.

Real-world data have suggested a detrimental effect of steroid use in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving immunotherapy. However, previous studies included heterogeneous cohorts of patients receiving different lines of treatment with several immuno-oncology agents and various combinations of chemotherapy and immuno-oncology agents.A comprehensive clinicopathologic database of patients with NSCLC and programmed cell death ligand 150% treated with frontline pembrolizumab monotherapy was constructed in 14 centers in Italy, Spain, Greece, and Switzerland. A multivariate analysis adjusting for the established prognostic factors was performed using a Cox regression model.For the 265 eligible patients, the median age at diagnosis was 67 years, 66% were male, 90% were current or former smokers, 18% had had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or 3. Of the NSCLC subtypes, 64% were adenocarcinoma and 25% were squamous cell. Of the patients, 18% had had brain metastases at diagnosis and 24% had received steroids before or during pembrolizumab treatment. The median time to progression was 4.4 months with and 13.7 months without steroid use (hazard ratio [HR], 2.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69-3.85; log-rank P .001). The median survival was 22.5 months for the whole cohort, 7.7 months for the steroid group, and not reached for the non-steroid group (HR, 3.64; 95% CI, 2.34-5.68; log-rank P .001). On multivariate analysis accounting for all established prognostic variables, steroid use was still independently associated with a high risk of progression (HR, 1.864; 95% CI, 1.179-2.949; P = .008) and death (HR, 2.292; 95% CI, 1.441-3.644; P .001) CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced NSCLC and programmed cell death ligand 1 expression50% receiving frontline pembrolizumab monotherapy, any use of steroids before or during treatment was associated with an 86% increase in the risk of progression and a 2.3-fold increase in the risk of death, even accounting for palliative indication-related bias, including the presence of central nervous system metastasis. The use of steroids for palliative indications should be restricted to absolutely necessary for patients receiving immuno-oncology monotherapy.

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with brain metastases (BMs) from non-oncogene addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is under investigation. Here, we sought to determine the optimal management of NSCLCs with PD-L1 ≥ 50% and asymptomatic BMs who were treated with first-line pembrolizumab. Thirty patients from 15 institutions with PD-L1 ≥ 50% NSCLC had asymptomatic BMs, and met inclusion criteria. Patients were classified based on whether they had undergone upfront local radiotherapy for BMs as well as on the type of brain radiotherapy received. Nine patients were treated with upfront pembrolizumab alone, 8 patients with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) followed by pembrolizumab and 13 patients with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) followed by pembrolizumab. Patients’ characteristics were similar among the three groups of patients except for a higher number of BMs ≥ 3 in the WBRT group. One complete and 4 partial intracranial responses were observed with upfront pembrolizumab alone. The median survival was not reached for the pembrolizumab and WBRT (n = 8) groups, and it was 7.6 months for the SRS (n = 13) group (P = 0.09), with 12-month survival rates being 55.5%, 62.5%, and 23.0%, respectively. Salvage WBRT was delivered in 1 patient in the upfront pembrolizumab group and in 4 patients in the SRS group. Upfront pembrolizumab showed efficacy in selected patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50% non-oncogene addicted NSCLC and asymptomatic BMs. Prospective studies should address whether pembrolizumab alone, and deferral of radiotherapy, could be pursued in this patient population.

ispartof: ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY vol:30 issue:11 pages:1686-1688 ispartof: location:England status: published

The mechanism of action of bevacizumab and erlotinib is quite different in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study sought to compare the two targeted therapies in terms of sequential tumor response metrics.Parameters of radiological tumor response evaluation were assessed at baseline and periodically in 58 patients receiving either bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (N=25) or erlotinib (N=33).Bevacizumab-treated patients had lower longest diameter at best response compared to the erlotinib group (p=0.011). The longest diameter, tumor volume and density significantly decreased from baseline to best response for the entire cohort and bevacizumab-treated patients; no difference was found in the erlotinib group.Treatment with bevacizumab substantially improved tumor metrics between baseline and each cycle of treatment, as well as between baseline and best response, in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Background: In this real-world multicenter study we addressed the activity of post-progression anticancer treatments after first-line pembrolizumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with PD-L1 ≥50%. Methods: Clinico-pathological data of PD-L1 ≥50% advanced NSCLCs who failed first-line pembrolizumab were collected in 14 Oncologic Centers from different European countries. Types of subsequent anticancer treatment and outcomes on salvage chemotherapy or pembrolizumab beyond progression with or without the addition of local ablative therapies were reported. Results: Out of 173 patients, 100 had progressed on pembrolizumab, of which 60 patients (60%) met eligibility criteria and were treated with either salvage chemotherapy (42/60, 70%) or pembrolizumab beyond progression (18/60, 30%). Overall, median age was 66 years, 63.3% were male, 60.0% had a performance status of 0–1, 88.3% were smokers and 61.7% had adenocarcinoma histology. In patients evaluable for response, objective response rate to salvage chemotherapy was 41.9%, with no significant difference according to the type of regimen (42.9% for platinum-based and 40.0% for single-agent chemotherapy). Median progression-free survival (PFS) to salvage chemotherapy was 4.5 months. Among patients treated with pembrolizumab beyond progression, 13 out of 18 patients (72.2%) had progressive disease in ≤2 organ sites, of whom 9 (69.2%) were managed with the addition of local ablative therapies consisting of radiation at progressive lesion(s). No significant difference was noted in terms of post-progression survival between the salvage chemotherapy and the pembrolizumab beyond progression groups of patients (6.9 versus 8.1 months, respectively, P=0.08). Conclusions: In PD-L1 ≥50% advanced NSCLCs who progress on first-line pembrolizumab, salvage chemotherapy is associated with a remarkable anticancer activity, while select patients may benefit from continuation of pembrolizumab beyond progression, with the possible addition of local ablative radiotherapy in oligoprogressive cases.