Search

Hypercoagulability is a common complication of the systemic inflammation related to coronavirus disease 2019 creating debate within the critical care community on the therapeutic utility of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH). We collected data on consecutive patients with COVID-19 admitted to the Emergency Department of Castel San Giovanni Hospital, between February 29th and April 7th, 2020. Exclusion criteria were age

Objective To evaluate the role of low molecular weight heparin in COVID-19 treatment.Design Retrospective cohort studySetting Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia consecutively admitted to Castel San Giovanni COVID- Hospital from February 29, to April 7, 2020.Main outcome measure Hospital mortality and safety in patients treated with low molecular weight hep- arin.Results Of the 257 patients enrolled, 49 (19.1%) died during the hospitalization. Hospital mortality was significantly lower in patients treated with therapeutic dose of low molecular weight heparin (T-LMWH) (17/126, 13.5%), compared with patients treated with prophylactic dose (P-LMWH) (32/131, 24.4%; χ²=4.98, p = 0.02). Crude and adjusted odds ratios of mortality for patients treated with T-LMWH were OR=0.483, 95% CI 0.252-0.923 and OR=0.374, 95% CI 0.177-0.792. In a stratified analysis by ventila- tion type, the only subgroup of patients who benefited from therapeutic doses of heparin were those re- ceiving non-invasive mechanical ventilation (OR=0.099, 95% CI 0.028-0.354, pConclusion Treatment with therapeutic doses of T-LMWH is safe and seems to reduce mortality in COVID-19 patients with pneumonia, especially among those who need non-invasive mechanical ventila- tion. We look forward to prospective studies to confirm this observation and evaluate the appropriate dose of LMWH in the treatment of COVID-19 patients.

Background: The role of thrombus aspiration plus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction remains controversial. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of 25 randomised controlled trials in which 21,740 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients were randomly assigned to thrombus aspiration plus primary percutaneous coronary intervention or primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Study endpoints were: death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and stroke. Results: On pooled analysis, the risk of death (4.3% vs. 4.8%, odds ratio (OR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79–1.03; P=0.123), myocardial infarction (2.4% vs. 2.5%, OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.80–1.13; P=0.57) and stent thrombosis (1.3% vs. 1.6%, OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.63–1.01; P=0.066) was similar between thrombus aspiration plus primary percutaneous coronary intervention and primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The risk of stroke was higher in the thrombus aspiration plus primary percutaneous coronary intervention than the primary percutaneous coronary intervention group (0.84% vs. 0.59%, OR 1.401, 95% CI 1.004–1.954; P=0.047). However, on sensitivity analysis after removing the TOTAL trial, thrombus aspiration plus primary percutaneous coronary intervention was not associated with an increased risk of stroke (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.58–1.78). The weak association between thrombus aspiration and stroke was also confirmed by the fact that the lower bound of the 95% CI was slightly below unity after removing either the study by Kaltoft or the ITTI trial. There was no interaction between the main study results and follow-up, evidence of coronary thrombus, or study sample size. Conclusions: In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, thrombus aspiration plus primary percutaneous coronary intervention does not reduce the risk of death, myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis. Thrombus aspiration plus primary percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with an increased risk of stroke; however, this latter finding appears weak.

We sought to investigate the prognostic significance of prodromal angina (PA) in unselected patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) and its additive predictive value to the GRACE score. We prospectively enrolled 3015 consecutive STEMI patients undergoing PPCI. Patients were divided in 2 groups according to the presence or absence of PA. Multivariable Cox regression was used to establish the relation to 2-year cardiac mortality of PA. The mean age of the study population was 68 (±14) years; 2178 patients (72%) were male. During follow-up, 395 (13%) patients died with 278 of these (9.2%) suffering from cardiac mortality. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed a survival rate of 95% and 87% for patients with PA and no PA, respectively (log rank test

Objective To determine, in patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), the prognostic weight of cardiac arrest (CA) according to the type of rhythm (shockable vs. non-shockable). Methods We prospectively enrolled 3278 consecutive STEMI patients undergoing PPCI. Multivariable Cox regression was used to establish the relation to 1-year cardiac mortality of both type of CA. In patients suffering from CA we identified predictors of both poor neurological outcome (cerebral performance categories 3–5) and cardiac mortality at 1 year. Results The incidence of CA was 7.26% (n = 238). Of these, 196 (5.98%) had an initial shockable rhythm and 42 (1.28%) a non shockable rhythm. During 1-year follow up 311(9.48%) patients died from cardiac causes. Shockable rhythm (adjusted-HR = 1.61; 95%CI 1.08–2.43, p = 0.02) and non-shockable rhythm (adjusted-HR = 3.83; 95%CI 2.36–6.22, p < 0.001) were independently associated with 1-year cardiac mortality. Among patients with CA those with shockable rhythm had a lower risk of poor neurological outcome at 1 year follow up (adjusted OR = 0.22: 95%CI; 0.08–0.55, p = 0.001). Independent predictors of 1-y cardiac mortality were: non shockable rhythm (adjusted HR = 2.6; 95%CI; 1.48–4.5, p = 0.001), crew-witnessed CA, diabetes mellitus, left ventricle ejection fraction and creatinine on admission. There was a significant interaction between type of rhythm and crew-witnessed CA (p = 0.026). Conclusions In patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI patients with both shockable and non shockable CA are at increased risk of 1-year cardiac mortality. Among patients with CA those with non shockable rhythm have an higher risk of both poor neurological outcome and cardiac mortality at 1 year.