Search

PR, IFPRI3; ISI; DCA; 2 Promoting Healthy Diets and Nutrition for all, Nutrition, Diets, and Health (NDH); Food and Nutrition Policy

PR, IFPRI3; ISI; 2 Promoting Healthy Diets and Nutrition for all; Alive and Thrive, PHND, Integrating nutrition interventions into antenatal care (ANC) requires adapting global recommendations to fit existing health systems and local contexts, but the evidence is limited on the process of tailoring nutrition interventions for health programmes. We developed and integrated maternal nutrition interventions into ANC programmes in Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia and India by conducting studies and assessments, developing new tools and processes and field testing integrated programme models. This paper elucidates how we used information and data to contextualize a package of globally recommended maternal nutrition interventions (micronutrient supplementation, weight gain monitoring, dietary counselling and counselling on breastfeeding) and describes four country-specific health service delivery models. We developed a Theory of Change to illustrate common barriers and strategies for strengthening nutrition interventions during ANC. We used multiple information sources including situational assessments, formative research, piloting and pretesting results, supply assessments, stakeholder meetings, household and service provider surveys and monitoring data to design models of maternal nutrition interventions. We developed detailed protocols for implementing maternal nutrition interventions; reinforced staff capacity, nutrition counselling, monitoring systems and community engagement processes; and addressed micronutrient supplement supply bottlenecks. Community-level activities were essential for complementing facility-based services. Routine monitoring data, rapid assessments and information from intensified supervision were important during the early stages of implementation to improve the feasibility and scalability of models. The lessons from addressing maternal nutrition in ANC may serve as a guide for tackling missed opportunities for nutrition within health services in other contexts.

PR, IFPRI3; ISI; CRP4; 2 Promoting Healthy Diets and Nutrition for all; Alive and Thrive, PHND; A4NH, CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH), Antenatal care (ANC) is the largest health platform globally for delivering maternal nutrition interventions (MNIs) to pregnant women. Yet, large missed opportunities remain in nutrition service delivery. This paper examines how well evidence-based MNIs were incorporated in national policies and programs in Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia and India. We compared the nutrition content of ANC protocols against global recommendations. We used survey data to elucidate the coverage of micronutrient supplementation, weight gain monitoring, dietary and breastfeeding counselling. We reviewed literature, formative research and program assessments to identify barriers and enabling factors of service provision and maternal nutrition practices. Nutrition information in national policies and protocols was often fragmented, incomplete and did not consistently follow global recommendations. Nationally representative data on MNIs in ANC was inadequate, except for iron and folic acid supplementation. Coverage data from subnational surveys showed similar patterns of strengths and weaknesses. MNI coverage was consistently lower than ANC coverage with the lowest coverage of weight gain monitoring and variable coverage of dietary and breastfeeding counselling. Key common factors associated with coverage were micronutrient supply disruptions; suboptimal counselling on maternal diet, weight gain, and breastfeeding; and limited or no record keeping. Adherence of women to micronutrient supplementation and dietary recommendations was low and associated with late and too few ANC contacts, poor maternal knowledge and self-efficacy, and insufficient family and community support. Models of comprehensive nutrition protocols and health systems that deliver maternal nutrition services in ANC are urgently needed along with national data systems to track progress.

PR, IFPRI3; ISI; CRP4; 2 Promoting Healthy Diets and Nutrition for all; POSHAN, PHND; A4NH; SAR, CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH), Suboptimal dietary intake is a critical cause of poor maternal nutrition, with several adverse consequences both for mothers and for their children. This study aimed to (1) assess maternal dietary patterns in India; (2) examine enablers and barriers in adopting recommended diets; (3) review current policy and program strategies to improve dietary intakes. We used mixed methods, including empirical analysis, compiling data from available national and subnational surveys, and reviewing literature, policy, and program strategies. Diets among pregnant women are characterized by low energy, macronutrient imbalance, and inadequate micronutrient intake. Supply- and demand-side constraints to healthy diets include food unavailability, poor economic situation, low exposure to nutrition counselling, food restrictions and taboos, adverse family influence and gender norms, and gaps in knowledge. Intervention strategies with potential to improve maternal diets include food-based programs, behavior change communication, and nutrition-sensitive agriculture interventions. However, strategies face implementation bottlenecks and limited effectiveness in real-world at-scale impact evaluations. In conclusion, investments in systems approaches spanning health, nutrition, and agriculture sectors, with evaluation frameworks at subnational levels, are needed to promote healthy diets for women.

PR, IFPRI3; ISI; 2 Promoting Healthy Diets and Nutrition for all; CRP4; Alive and Thrive; DCA; POSHAN, PHND; A4NH; SAR, CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH), Background: Maternal nutrition interventions are inadequately integrated into antenatal care (ANC). Alive & Thrive aimed to strengthen delivery of micronutrient supplements and intensify interpersonal counseling and community mobilization through government ANC services. Objectives: We compared nutrition-intensified ANC (I-ANC) with standard ANC (S-ANC) on coverage of nutrition interventions and maternal nutrition practices. Methods: We used a cluster-randomized design with cross-sectional baseline (2017) and endline (2019) surveys (n ∼660 pregnant and 1800 recently delivered women per survey) and a repeated-measures longitudinal study in 2018–2019 (n = 400). We derived difference-in-difference effect estimates (DIDs) for diet diversity, consumption of micronutrient supplements, weight monitoring, and early breastfeeding practices. Results: Despite substantial secular improvements in service coverage from India's national nutrition program, women in the I-ANC arm received more home visits [DID: 7–14 percentage points (pp)] and counseling on core nutrition messages (DID: 10–23 pp) than in the S-ANC arm. One-third of women got ≥3 home visits and one-fourth received ≥4 ANC check-ups in the I-ANC arm. Improvements were greater in the I-ANC arm than in the S-ANC arm for any receipt and consumption of iron–folic acid (DID: 7.5 pp and 9.5 pp, respectively) and calcium supplements (DID: 14.1 pp and 11.5 pp, respectively). Exclusive breastfeeding improved (DID: 7.5 pp) but early initiation of breastfeeding did not. Maternal food group consumption (∼4 food groups) and probability of adequacy of micronutrients (∼20%) remained low in both arms. Repeated-measures longitudinal analyses showed similar results, with additional impact on consumption of vitamin A–rich foods (10 pp, 11 g/d), other vegetables and fruits (22–29 g/d), and gestational weight gain (0.4 kg). Conclusions: Intensifying nutrition in government ANC services improved maternal nutrition practices even with strong

PR, IFPRI3; 2 Promoting Healthy Diets and Nutrition for all; CRP4; Alive and Thrive; POSHAN, PHND; A4NH; SAR, CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH), Background: In response to the high levels of maternal nutrition in Uttar Pradesh, Alive & Thrive (A&T) aimed to strengthen the delivery of nutrition interventions through the government antenatal care platform, including leveraging ongoing data collection to improve program delivery and reach (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03378141). However, we have a limited understanding of providers’ experiences and challenges of collecting and using data for decision making. Objective: To identify barriers and facilitators to the 1) collection of data and 2) use of data for decision-making. Methods: In-depth interviews (N = 35) were conducted among block-level government staff, frontline worker (FLW) supervisors and A&T staff in two districts in Uttar Pradesh. Systematic coding of verbatim transcripts and detailed summaries were undertaken to elucidate themes related to data collection and use. FLW supervisors (N = 103) were surveyed to assess data use experiences. Results: Data were used to understand the reach of maternal nutrition services, estimate the demand for supplements and guide identification of areas of low FLW performance. About half of supervisors reported using data to identify areas of improvement; however, only 23% reported using data to inform decision-making. Facilitators of data collection and use included collaboration between health department officials, perceived importance of block ranking and monthly review meetings with staff and supervisors to review and discuss data. Barriers to data collection and use included human resource gaps, inadequate technology infrastructure, FLW education level, political structure and lack of cooperation between FLWs and supervisors. Conclusions: Use of data for decision-making is critical for supporting intervention planning and providing targeted supervision and support for FLWs. Despite intensive data collection efforts, the use of data to inform decision-making remains limited. Collaboration facilitated data collection and u

PR, IFPRI3; ISI; CRP4; 2 Promoting Healthy Diets and Nutrition for all; POSHAN, PHND; A4NH; SAR, CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH), Background: The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic may substantially affect health systems, but little primary evidence is available on disruption of health and nutrition services. Objectives: This study aimed to 1) determine the extent of disruption in provision and utilization of health and nutrition services induced by the pandemic in Uttar Pradesh, India; and 2) identify how adaptations were made to restore service provision in response to the pandemic. Methods: We conducted longitudinal surveys with frontline workers (FLWs, n = 313) and mothers of children <2 y old (n = 659) in December 2019 (in-person) and July 2020 (by phone). We also interviewed block-level managers and obtained administrative data. We examined changes in service provision and utilization using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests. Results: Compared with prepandemic, service provision reduced substantially during lockdown (83–98 percentage points, pp), except for home visits and take-home rations (∼30%). Most FLWs (68%–90%) restored service provision in July 2020, except for immunization and hot cooked meals (<10%). Administrative data showed similar patterns of disruption and restoration. FLW fears, increased workload, inadequate personal protective equipment (PPE), and manpower shortages challenged service provision. Key adaptations made to provide services were delivering services to beneficiary homes (∼40%–90%), social distancing (80%), and using PPE (40%–50%) and telephones for communication (∼20%). On the demand side, service utilization reduced substantially (40–80 pp) during the lockdown, but about half of mothers received home visits and food supplementation. Utilization for most services did not improve after the lockdown, bearing the challenges of limited travel (30%), nonavailability of services (26%), and fear of catching the virus when leaving the house (22%) or meeting service providers (14%). Conclusions: COVID-19 disrupted the provision and use of health and nutrition servi

PR, IFPRI3; ISI; POSHAN; 2 Promoting Healthy Diets and Nutrition for all, PHND; SAR, Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has profound negative impacts on people’s lives, but little is known on its effect on household food insecurity (HFI) in poor setting resources. This study assessed changes in HFI during the pandemic and examined the interlinkages between HFI with child feeding practices and coping strategies. Design: A longitudinal survey in December 2019 (in-person) and August 2020 (by phone). Setting: Community-based individuals from 26 blocks in 2 districts in Uttar Pradesh, India. Participants: Mothers with children <2 years (n=569). Main outcomes and analyses: We measured HFI by using the HFI Access Scale and examined the changes in HFI during the pandemic using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests. We then assessed child feeding practices and coping strategies by HFI status using multivariable regression models. Results: HFI increased sharply from 21% in December 2019 to 80% in August 2020, with 62% households changing the status from food secure to insecure over this period. Children in newly or consistently food-insecure households were less likely to consume a diverse diet (adjusted OR, AOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.95 and AOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.12, respectively) compared with those in food-secure households. Households with consistent food insecurity were more likely to engage in coping strategies such as reducing other essential non-food expenditures (AOR 2.2, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.24), borrowing money to buy food (AOR 4.3, 95% CI 2.31 to 7.95) or selling jewellery (AOR 5.0, 95% CI 1.74 to 14.27) to obtain foods. Similar findings were observed for newly food-insecure households. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic and its lockdown measures posed a significant risk to HFI which in turn had implications for child feeding practices and coping strategies. Our findings highlight the need for further investment in targeted social protection strategies and safety nets as part of multisectoral solutions to improve HFI during and after COVID-1

Non-PR, IFPRI5; POSHAN; CRP4; Alive and Thrive, PHND; A4NH; SAR, CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH), Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has significant potential implications for health systems, but little primary evidence is available on effects on health and nutrition services. We aimed to examine changes in service provision and utilization during the pandemic in Uttar Pradesh, India and identify positive adaptations to service delivery. Methods: We conducted longitudinal surveys with frontline workers (FLW, n = 313) and mothers of children < 2 years (n = 659) in December 2019 (in-person) and July 2020 (by phone). We also interviewed block-level managers and obtained administrative data. We examined changes in service provision and utilization using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests. Results: Compared to pre-pandemic, service provision reduced substantially during lockdown (83–98 percentage points, pp), except for home visits and take-home-rations (∼30%). Most FLWs (68–90%) resumed service provision in July 2020, except for immunization and hot-cooked meals (< 10%). Administrative data showed similar patterns of disruption and resumption. FLW fears, increased workload, inadequate personal protective equipment (PPE), and manpower shortages challenged service delivery. Key adaptations made to provide services included: delivering services to beneficiary homes (∼40–90%), social distancing (80%), using PPE (40–50%), and telephones for communication (∼20%). On the demand side, service utilization also reduced substantially (40–80pp) during the lockdown, but about half of mothers received home visits and food supplementation. Utilization for most services did not improve after the lockdown, bearing challenges of limited travel (30%), non-availability of services (26%), fear of catching virus when leaving the house (22%) or meeting service providers (14%). Conclusions: COVID-19 affected the provision and use of health and nutrition services despite efforts at service restoration and adaptations. Strengthening logistics support, capacity enhancement, performance m

Non-PR, IFPRI5; POSHAN; CRP4; Alive and Thrive, PHND; A4NH; SAR, CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH), Objectives: The Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has profound negative impacts on people's lives, but little is known on the effect of COVID-19 on household food insecurity (HFI) in poor setting resources. This study aimed to assess the changes in HFI during the pandemic and examine the interlinkages between HFI with child feeding practices and coping strategies in Uttar Pradesh, India. Methods: We conducted a longitudinal quantitative survey with 569 mothers with children <2y in December 2019 (in-person) and August 2020 (by phone). We measured HFI by using the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale and examined the changes in HFI during the pandemic using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests. We then assessed child feeding practices and coping strategies by HFI status using multivariable regression models. Results: HFI increased sharply from 21% to 80% before and during COVID-19, with 62% households changing the status from food security to insecurity and 17% remaining food insecure. Children belonging to newly and consistently food-insecure households were less likely to consume a diversified diet (adjusted odds ratio, AOR: 0.56, P = 0.03 and AOR: 0.45, P = 0.04, respectively) compared to those in food-secure households. Households with food insecurity were more likely to engage in coping strategies for obtaining foods including reducing other essential non-food expenditures (AOR: 1.7–2.2), borrowing money to buy food (AOR: 3.6–4.3), selling jewelry (AOR: 3.0–5.0), and spending savings or selling other assets (AOR∼2.0), all P < 0.05. Conclusions: COVID-19 had a significant negative impact on HFI, which in turn had implications for child feeding practices and coping strategies. Our findings highlighted the need for further investment in targeted social protection strategies and safety nets as part of multisectoral solutions to improve HFI during and post-COVID-19.

PR, IFPRI3; 2 Promoting Healthy Diets and Nutrition for all; ISI, PHND, Evidence on strategies to improve infant and young child feeding in India, a country that carries the world's largest burden of undernutrition, is limited. In the context of a programme evaluation in two districts in Uttar Pradesh, we sought to understand the multiple influences on breastfeeding practices and to model potential programme influence on improving breastfeeding. A cross‐sectional survey was conducted among 1,838 recently delivered women, 1,194 husbands, and 1,353 mothers/mothers‐in‐law. We used bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models to examine the association between key determinants (maternal, household, community, and health services) and breastfeeding outcomes [early initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF)], prelacteal feed, and exclusive breastfeeding (EBF). We used population attributable risk analysis to estimate potential improvement in breastfeeding practices. Breastfeeding practices were suboptimal: EIBF (26.3%), EBF (54%), and prelacteal feeding (33%). EIBF was positively associated with maternal knowledge, counselling during pregnancy/delivery, and vaginal delivery at a health facility. Prelacteal feeds were less likely to be given when mothers had higher knowledge, beliefs and self‐efficacy, delivered at health facility, and mothers/mothers‐in‐law had attended school. EBF was positively associated with maternal knowledge, beliefs and self‐efficacy, parity, and socio‐economic status. High maternal stress and domestic violence contributed to lower EBF. Under optimal programme implementation, we estimate EIBF can be improved by 25%, prelacteal feeding can be reduced by 25%, and EBF can be increased by 23%. A multifactorial approach, including maternal‐, health service‐, family‐, and community‐level interventions has the potential to lead to significant improvements in breastfeeding practices in Uttar Pradesh.

PR, IFPRI3; ISI; CRP4; Alive and Thrive; 2 Promoting Healthy Diets and Nutrition for all; Capacity Strengthening, PHND; A4NH, CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH), Poor dietary intake during pregnancy remains a significant public health concern, affecting the health of the mother and fetus. This study examines the adequacy of energy, macronutrient, and micronutrient intakes among self-declared lacto-vegetarian and non-vegetarian pregnant women. We analyzed dietary data from 627 pregnant women in Uttar Pradesh, India, using a multiple-pass 24 h diet recall. Compared to non-vegetarians, lacto-vegetarians (~46%) were less likely to report excessive carbohydrate (78% vs. 63%) and inadequate fat intakes (70% vs. 52%). In unadjusted analyses, lacto-vegetarians had a slightly higher mean PA for micronutrients (20% vs. 17%), but these differences were no longer significant after controlling for caste, education, and other demographic characteristics. In both groups, the median intake of 9 out of 11 micronutrients was below the Estimated Average Requirement. In conclusion, the energy and micronutrient intakes were inadequate, and the macronutrient intakes were imbalanced, regardless of stated dietary preferences. Since diets are poor across the board, a range of policies and interventions that address the household food environment, nutrition counseling, behavior change, and supplementation are needed in order to achieve adequate nutrient intake for pregnant women in this population.