Search

Background: To address challenges presented to clinicians to diagnose and treat molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH), a new assessment tool was created. Aim: To explore the reproducibility and validity of a new instrument developed to assess MIH. Methods: Inter‐rater and test‐retest reliabilities were examined using Cronbach's alpha. Thirty‐five oral health professionals scored clinical photographs for the presence/absence of MIH and other enamel defects using the new index. Face, content, and construct validities were assessed. A panel of six experienced researchers assessed face validity. Construct validity was determined by examining hypothesised associations with clinical variables reported to change concurrently or as modifiers of the MIH outcome. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were also assessed. Results: The index reflected the hypothesised associations regarding the presence, prevalence, and severity of MIH, demonstrating construct validity. Researchers indicated that codes and definitions were clear and suitable for international use. The index showed satisfactory scores of sensitivity/specificity and PPV/NPV. Examiners achieved "Substantial" to "Almost perfect" levels of agreement in clinical presentation and lesion extension. Conclusions: The tested MIH index had reasonably solid properties providing confidence that it is a reliable and valid instrument for use in population‐based and clinical screenings for diagnosis of MIH and other enamel defects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving older adults from social clubs within a regional local government area in the state of Victoria, Australia, to identify factors associated with knowledge, and attitudes about oral health, as well as perceived self-efficacy.Methods: Participants underwent an oral health interview, followed by a comprehensive oral clinical examination.Results: A total of 225 older adults participated in this study. The mean age was 70.7 (range: 55-96) years. The majority was females (62.0%) and had incomplete secondary education or less (56.1%); 34.2% were fully edentulous. The mean oral health knowledge score was 24.7 (SD 3.8). None of the socio-demographic and oral health variables yielded a significant effect on the knowledge score. The attitude score had a mean of 5.0 (SD 1.6). Four variables remained significant in the multivariate analysis [p < 0.0001]. A dentate female, with tertiary education, had better oral health attitudes. Higher oral health knowledge scores were associated with a better attitude. The overall self-efficacy mean value was 83.1% (SD 10.6). Dental visits and oral health knowledge remained significant in the attitudes multivariate analysis [p < 0.01].Conclusion: Findings indicate that there were some misconceptions in oral health among this group of older adults. These are important influences on the success/failure of an oral health programme. Oral health education is needed to increase older adults' oral health knowledge, in particular of oral cancer, and to some extent periodontal disease, and improves attitudes and oral health self-efficacy. Oral health knowledge, attitudes and self-efficacy were minimally explained by socio-demographic and clinical variables. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]