Search

In this study, shear-critical reinforced concrete (RC) beams were strengthened by combining the prestressing and near-surface mounted (NSM) rods approaches. The potential danger of failure in such RC beams is a substantial concern as it is considered a potential threat. This study addresses its careful mitigation through experimental identification and numerical analysis to enhance the safety and sustainability of buildings by reducing the probability of failure risk for these RC beams. Nine of the ten RC beams that were tested had strengthened, and one had not. Internal prestressing (IP) within the beam body, external prestressing NSM (PNSM), internal embedment (IE) inside the beam with or without prestressing, and NSM are the strengthening technologies that were employed. The range of the extra shear reinforcement ratios (μs) was 0.87% to 1.60%. We investigated how strengthened beams behaved structurally in terms of the cracking load, ultimate load, load–deflection response, ultimate deflection, and stiffness. The insertion of five pairs of PNSM rods (μs = 1.45%) and five pairs of IP rods (μs = 1.6%), respectively, increased the beams' shear capacity by 57.8% and 70.4%. Shear capacity increased by 23.2% when three pairs of IE rods (μs = 1.02%) were installed. The prestressing location had an impact on shear capacity, with the interior case surpassing the external one. Compared to the control, the stiffness of the strengthened beams rose by 20%, 82%, and 84.4% when three, four, or five pairs of internal prestressing rods were added. A formula is proposed to calculate the shear capacity of all beams strengthened using various methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study delves into the efficacy of external strengthening methods in improving the shear behavior of defected reinforced concrete (RC) beams that lack shear stirrups, utilizing both experimental and numerical methodologies. Failure risk of such beams is a potential threat which is mitigated carefully to increase building safety and sustainability to avoid risk of construction failure. Ten RC beams underwent three-point experimental testing to assess the influence of the strengthening scheme and the presence of mechanical anchors. Two beams were designated as control specimens, while eight beams were strengthened with the application of additional strain-hardening cementitious composite (SHCC) layer in various configurations. These configurations encompassed single-sided, two-sided, and strip applications, with the inclusion of mechanical anchors. The study found that employing a single-sided SHCC, incorporating vertically bent bars into the RC beam, is recognized for its efficient alleviation of degradation in shear reinforcement. The incorporation of three SHCC strips to partially reinforce the compromised beams demonstrated a modest impact on the initial stiffness. Nevertheless, noteworthy enhancements of 46% and 42% were observed in both cracking and ultimate loads, respectively. Furthermore, increasing the number of the SHCC strips to four resulted in a more significant improvement in the load–deflection responses. Enhancing the compromised beams by applying four SHCC strips to the beams using bolts offers a feasible alternative to the configuration where SHCC was uniformly attached along the entire defected zone. Moreover, a numerical model was created to simulate the tested beams. The model effectively anticipated the progression of cracks, ultimate capacity, and deflection, indicating excellent agreement with the experimental observations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]