Search

The aim of this prospective explorative study was to evaluate the safety and the effectiveness of topical polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine (PVP-I) administered during the time-to-results period for pathogen identification and susceptibility testing in patients with infectious keratitis (IK). A corneal swab (CS) for antimicrobial evaluation was performed at enrollment (T0) and topical 0.66%-PVP-I was administered until the laboratory results were available (T1). Ulcer and infiltrate areas and infiltrate depths were compared between T0 and T1 (i.e., time-to-result period). Patients were then shifted to a specific antimicrobial therapy and followed up until resolution of their infiltrates (Tlast-TL). Twenty-five eyes were enrolled, and none showed clinical worsening leading to protocol withdrawal. At T1, ulcer and infiltrate areas showed significant improvement in Gram-positive IK (n = 13–52%; p = 0.027 and p = 0.019, respectively), remained stable in fungal IK (n = 5–20%; both p = 0.98) and increased in those with Gram-negative bacteria (n = 4–16%; p = 0.58 and p = 0.27). Eyes with negative cultures (n = 3–12%) showed complete resolution at T1 and did not initiate any additional antimicrobial therapy. The administration of 0.66% PVP-I during the time-to-result period seems to be a safe strategy in patients with IK while often sparing broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. In addition, it showed to be effective in eyes with a Gram-positive bacterial infection.

Background The current management guidelines recommend that patients with borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (BRPC) should initially receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The addition of advanced radiation therapy modalities, including stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT), could result in a more effective neoadjuvant strategy, with higher rates of margin-free resections and improved survival outcomes. Methods/design In this single-center, single-arm, intention-to-treat, phase II trial newly diagnosed BRPC will receive a “total neoadjuvant” therapy with FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin) and hypofractionated SBRT (5 fractions, total dose of 30 Gy with simultaneous integrated boost of 50 Gy on tumor-vessel interface). Following surgical exploration or resection, IORT will be also delivered (10 Gy). The primary endpoint is 3-year survival. Secondary endpoints include completion of neoadjuvant treatment, resection rate, acute and late toxicities, and progression-free survival. In the subset of patients undergoing resection, per-protocol analysis of disease-free and disease-specific survival will be performed. The estimated sample size is 100 patients over a 36-month period. The trial is currently recruiting. Trial registration NCT04090463 at clinicaltrials.gov.

Background Surgical site infections are an important burden of pancreatic surgery, prolonging hospitalization and delaying adjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to compare negative pressure wound therapy with standard sterile dressing in terms of the prevention of non–organ-space surgical site infection (superficial and deep surgical site infection) in the high-risk setting. Methods The trial was conducted at the University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy, from July 25, 2018, through October 10, 2019, among adults undergoing surgery for periampullary neoplasms. Only patients at high-risk for surgical site infection based on body mass index, diabetes, steroids, neoadjuvant therapy, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, Charlson comorbidity index, duration of surgery, and blood loss were included and randomized. Results A total of 351 patients were screened, 100 met the inclusion criteria and were 1:1 allocated in the 2 arms. The difference in terms of non–organ-space surgical site infection comparing negative pressure wound therapy with standard sterile dressing was not significant (10.9 vs 12.2%, risk ratio [RR] 1.144, confidence interval [CI] 95% 0.324–4.040, P = 1.000). Hematomas (4.3 vs 2%, RR 1.565, CI 95% 0.312–7.848, P = .609) and organ-space infections (46.7 vs 43.8%, RR 1.059, CI 95% 0.711–1.576, P = .836) were similar. Negative pressure wound therapy prevented the development of seromas (0 vs 12.2%, RR 0.483, CI 95% 0.390–0.599, P = .027). The aesthetic result assessed on postoperative day 7 was better in the negative pressure wound therapy group (visual analogue scale, 8 vs 7, P = .029; Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale, 3.2 vs 2.5, P = .009), but it was no more evident on postoperative day 30 after a total number of 23 dropouts. Conclusion Compared with standard sterile dressing, negative pressure wound therapy is not associated with an improved rate of non–organ-space surgical site infection after surgery for periampullary neoplasms in patients at high risk for surgical site infection. Additional studies will help identify the population that could benefit most from this intervention.

The intraoperative identification of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) is of utmost importance to drive their laparoscopic resection. Near-infrared (NIR) surgery has emerged as a new technique for localizing tumors or neoplastic tissue. This study aimed to explore the results of the application of NIR in the laparoscopic resection of PanNETs. Per protocol we enrolled ten subjects undergoing laparoscopic pancreatic surgery for PanNET from March 2016 to October 2016. During surgery, the patients were injected with indocyanine green dye (ICG, 25 mg given in 5 boli of 5 mg each). The switch-activation of NIR was performed to identify PanNETs. An ex-post analysis of the images was realized using ImageJ Software® to calculate the fluorescence signal. NIR imaging identified all ten PanNETs. Nine (90%) laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy and one (10%) laparoscopic enucleation were performed. The mean maximum tumor dimension was 2.4 cm (range 1–4 cm). Eight non-functioning PanNETs (80%) and two insulinomas (20%) were found at the final pathology. Nine out of ten (90%) PanNETs were detected after the second ICG bolus. The mean latency time was 80 s and the mean visibility time was 220 s. The peak of tumor visualization was reached 20 min after the last bolus. This finding was confirmed by the ex-post analysis of the fluorescence signal (mean signal-to-background ratio of 7.7, p = 0.001). NIR identified two additional lesions, which turned out to be normal lymph nodes at final pathology. A fluorescent signal was identified at the bed of the enucleation, and thus, a further exeresis was performed and final pathology revealed that is was residual neoplastic tissue. This explorative study shows that NIR with ICG can have a role in laparoscopic pancreatic resection of PanNETs. Further studies are needed to assess the proper setting and role of this new and promising technology.

Surgical-site infection (SSI) increases treatment costs, duration of hospital stay and readmission rate after pancreatic surgery. This study aimed to assess whether a wound protector could reduce the risk of superficial incisional SSI after pancreatoduodenectomy.This RCT included patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy at Verona University Hospital, between 2017 and 2018. The experimental group had a dual-ring wound protector, whereas the control group had standard surgical drapes. The groups were stratified by preoperative biliary stent placement. The primary outcome was the overall rate of superficial SSI.An interim analysis was conducted after 212 patients had been enrolled; 22 patients (10·4 per cent) were excluded owing to inability to complete the pancreatoduodenectomy, or the need for postoperative reintervention. Some 94 patients (49·5 per cent) had a wound protector and 96 (50·5 per cent) had standard drapes. There were no differences between groups in demographics, or in intraoperative findings, pathological data or surgical outcomes. The overall superficial SSI rate was 7·4 per cent, which did not differ between groups (7 per cent in each group; P = 0·585). Subanalysis of patients with a preoperative biliary stent showed a similar outcome (superficial SSI rate 9 versus 8 per cent with wound protector versus surgical drapes respectively; P = 0·536). The trial was stopped prematurely on the grounds of futility.Use of a wound protector did not reduce the rate of superficial SSI after pancreatoduodenectomy. Registration number: NCT03820648 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).La infección de la herida quirúrgica (surgical-site infection, SSI), especialmente de la incisión, aumenta sobremanera los costes del tratamiento, la duración de la estancia y la tasa de reingresos en la cirugía de páncreas. En los últimos años se han introducido los protectores de las heridas (wound protectors, WP) con la intención de reducir la tasa de SSI. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar si un WP podría reducir la incidencia de la SSI superficial de la incisión (superficial incisional surgical-site infection, SI-SSI) en pacientes sometidos a duodenopancreatectomía cefálica (pancreaticoduodenectomy, PD). MÉTODOS: Ensayo aleatorizado controlado en el que se incluyeron los pacientes a los que se realizó una PD en la Universidad de Verona entre 2017 y 2018. En el grupo experimental se utilizó un WP de doble anillo, mientras que el grupo control se utilizaron tallas quirúrgicas convencionales (standard drape, SD). Los grupos se estratificaron también según la colocación preoperatoria de una prótesis biliar.Se incluyeron 212 pacientes, de los que 22 (10%) abandonaron el estudio debido a la imposibilidad de realizar la DP o a la necesidad de una reintervención durante el curso postoperatorio. Los pacientes se dividieron en 94 (49%) en el grupo WP y 96 (51%) en el grupo SD. No se detectaron diferencias entre grupos en cuanto a las variables demográficas y a los resultados intraoperatorios, patológicos o quirúrgicos. La tasa global de SI-SSI fue del 7,4%, que no difirió entre los grupos (WP 7,5% versus SD 7,3%, P = 0,585). Teniendo en cuenta los resultados descritos, se cumplieron los criterios de futilidad del análisis y el ensayo se interrumpió prematuramente. CONCLUSIÓN: En el entorno de un centro de alto volumen, la WP por si sola no redujo la tasa de SI-SSI. Cabría plantear su utilización dentro de un programa multimodal, que debería incluir un replanteamiento interno de la institución encaminado a la reducción de complicaciones infecciosas.