Search

Low attention has generally been dedicated to the influence of clinical presentation, extent of venous thrombosis and presence of residual vein obstruction (RVO) on the decision about the duration of secondary prophylaxis after a first venous thromboembolism (VTE).This study aimed at investigating the role of the mentioned VTE characteristics on the therapeutic decision using the information collected in the international, prospective, observational WHITE study.1240 patients were recruited by 79 clinical centers in 7 countries (China, Czechia, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, and Tunisia). 35 patients had as index event a pulmonary embolism (PE) without a deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and all continued anticoagulation. We focused on the 1205 subjects with DVT. The treatment decision differed among countries; altogether, more than 85% of patients with proximal (with or without distal) DVT continued a prophylactic treatment with anticoagulants, or antithrombotics; 34% of patients with isolated distal DVT stopped treatment, and more than 85% of patients with a PE associated to a DVT continued treatment. At multivariable analysis, the presence of proximal DVT, signs of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), residual vein obstruction (RVO), maintenance180 days and concomitant diseases was associated with increased probability to continue secondary prophylaxis.The presentation as proximal DVT (with or without PE) or isolated PE influenced the treating physicians' decision in favor of extension of secondary prophylaxis, together with the presence of concomitant diseases and local conditions which may increase the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome.

The decision on treatment after a first venous thromboembolism (VTE) to prevent recurrences may be influenced by many factors. The prospective, observational, WHITE study aimed to analyze how this issue was tackled in every-day clinical practice in various countries, which have sensibly different socio-economic conditions and healthcare systems. Doctors active in 79 Internal or Vascular clinical centers in 7 countries (China, Czechia, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, and Tunisia) enrolled VTE patients after the maintenance treatment phase. The present report analyzed information, collected in the central database, regarding the baseline characteristics, index events, type and duration of anticoagulant therapy and decision on post-maintenance treatment. From April 2018 to December 2020, 1240 patients were enrolled, 58% with an unprovoked index event. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were used in > 85% of all cases in China, Poland, Portugal, Russia and Czechia, in 52% in Slovakia and in no patient in Tunisia. The maintenance anticoagulation lasted in average approximately 6 months. Altogether, anticoagulation was stopped in 20%, extended in about 50%, regardless of whether the event was unprovoked or provoked and shifted to antithrombotics (mainly sulodexide or aspirin) in the remaining patients. In conclusion, some differences in VTE patient management were found between countries. The provoked/unprovoked nature of the index event, instead, was not the prevalent criterion to drive the decision on extension of anticoagulation, without large variations between countries. DOACs were the most widely used anticoagulant drugs, whereas > 25% of patients received antithrombotic drugs instead of anticoagulants as extended treatment. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11739-021-02765-1.

Background— Patients with a first episode of unprovoked venous thromboembolism have a high risk of recurrence after discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy. Extending anticoagulation reduces the risk of recurrence but is associated with increased bleeding. Sulodexide, a glycosaminoglycan, exerts antithrombotic and profibrinolytic actions with a low bleeding risk when administered orally, but its benefit for preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism is not well known. Methods and Results— In this multicenter, double-blind study, 615 patients with first-ever unprovoked venous thromboembolism who had completed 3 to 12 months of oral anticoagulant treatment were randomly assigned to sulodexide 500 lipasemic units twice daily or placebo for 2 years, in addition to elastic stockings. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrence of venous thromboembolism. Major or clinically relevant bleeding was the primary safety outcome. Venous thromboembolism recurred in 15 of the 307 patients who received sulodexide and in 30 of the 308 patients who received placebo (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27–0.92; P =0.02). The analysis in which lost to follow-up was assigned to failure yielded a risk ratio among treated versus control subjects of 0.54 (95% confidence interval, 0.35–0.85; P =0.009). No major bleeding episodes occurred; 2 patients in each treatment group had a clinically relevant bleeding episode. Adverse events were similar in the 2 groups. Conclusion— Sulodexide given after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment reduced the risk of recurrence in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism, with no apparent increase of bleeding risk. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ . Identifier: EudraCT number 2009-016923-77.