Search

DNA looping is important for genome organization in all domains of life. The basis of DNA loop formation is the bridging of two separate DNA double helices. Detecting DNA bridge formation generally involves the use of complex single-molecule techniques (atomic force microscopy, magnetic, or optical tweezers). Although DNA bridging can be qualitatively described, quantification of DNA bridging and bridging dynamics using these techniques is challenging. Here, we describe a novel biochemical assay capable of not only detecting DNA bridge formation, but also allowing for quantification of DNA bridging efficiency and the effects of physico-chemical conditions on DNA bridge formation.

Three new trans-ruthenium(ii) complexes coordinated to tetrapyridyl ligands, namely [Ru(bapbpy)(dmso)Cl]Cl ([2]Cl), [Ru(bapbpy)(Hmte)2](PF6)2 ([3](PF6)2), and [Ru(biqbpy)(Hmte)2](PF6)2 ([4](PF6)2), were prepared as analogues of [Ru(biqbpy)(dmso)Cl]Cl ([1]Cl), a recently described photoactivated chemotherapy agent. The new complexes were characterized, and their crystal structures showed the distorted coordination octahedron typical of this family of complexes. Their photoreactivity in solution was analyzed by spectrophotometry and mass spectrometry, which showed that the sulfur ligand was substituted upon blue light irradiation. The binding of the ruthenium complexes to a reference single-stranded oligonucleotide (s(5'CTACGGTTTCAC3')) was explored both in the dark and under light irradiation by gel electrophoresis and high-resolution mass spectrometry. While adduct formation in the dark was negligible for the four complexes, light irradiation led to the formation of adducts with one or two ruthenium centers per oligonucleotide. The absence of interactions in the dark and the presence of complex-oligonucleotide adducts demonstrate that visible light controls the interaction of these ruthenium complexes with nucleic acids.

α-Galactosidases (EC 3.2.1.22) are retaining glycosidases that cleave terminal α-linked galactose residues from glycoconjugate substrates. α-Galactosidases take part in the turnover of cell wall–associated galactomannans in plants and in the lysosomal degradation of glycosphingolipids in animals. Deficiency of human α-galactosidase A (α-Gal A) causes Fabry disease (FD), a heritable, X-linked lysosomal storage disorder, characterized by accumulation of globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) and globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb3). Current management of FD involves enzyme-replacement therapy (ERT). An activity-based probe (ABP) covalently labeling the catalytic nucleophile of α-Gal A has been previously designed to study α-galactosidases for use in FD therapy. Here, we report that this ABP labels proteins in Nicotiana benthamiana leaf extracts, enabling the identification and biochemical characterization of an N. benthamiana α-galactosidase we name here A1.1 (gene accession ID GJZM-1660). The transiently overexpressed and purified enzyme was a monomer lacking N-glycans and was active toward 4-methylumbelliferyl-α-d-galactopyranoside substrate (K(m) = 0.17 mm) over a broad pH range. A1.1 structural analysis by X-ray crystallography revealed marked similarities with human α-Gal A, even including A1.1's ability to hydrolyze Gb3 and lyso-Gb3, which are not endogenous in plants. Of note, A1.1 uptake into FD fibroblasts reduced the elevated lyso-Gb3 levels in these cells, consistent with A1.1 delivery to lysosomes as revealed by confocal microscopy. The ease of production and the features of A1.1, such as stability over a broad pH range, combined with its capacity to degrade glycosphingolipid substrates, warrant further examination of its value as a potential therapeutic agent for ERT-based FD management.

Plants adapt to fluctuating light conditions by a process called non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), where membrane protein PsbS plays a crucial role and transforms a change in the pH-gradient across the thylakoid membrane under excess light conditions into a photoprotective state, leading to de-excitation of antenna chlorophylls. The PsbS activation mechanism is elusive and has been proposed to involve a monomerization step and protonation of specific residues. To elucidate its function, it is essential to produce PsbS in large quantities, stabilize PsbS in a membrane-mimicking environment and analyze its pH-dependent conformational structure. We present an approach for large-scale in-vitro production and spectroscopic characterization of PsbS under controlled, non-crystalline conditions. We produced PsbS of the moss Physcomitrella patens in milligram quantities in E. coli, refolded PsbS in several detergent types and analyzed its conformation at neutral and low pH by Dynamic Light Scattering and NMR spectroscopy. Our results reveal that at both pH conditions, PsbS exist as dimers or in apparent monomer-dimer equilibria. Lowering of the pH induces conformational changes, destabilizes the dimer state and shifts the equilibria towards the monomeric form. In vivo, a similar response upon thylakoid lumen acidification may tune PsbS activity in a gradual manner.

Bacteria frequently need to adapt to altered environmental conditions. Adaptation requires changes in gene expression, often mediated by global regulators of transcription. The nucleoid-associated protein H-NS is a key global regulator in Gram-negative bacteria and is believed to be a crucial player in bacterial chromatin organization via its DNA-bridging activity. H-NS activity in vivo is modulated by physico-chemical factors (osmolarity, pH, temperature) and interaction partners. Mechanistically, it is unclear how functional modulation of H-NS by such factors is achieved. Here, we show that a diverse spectrum of H-NS modulators alter the DNA-bridging activity of H-NS. Changes in monovalent and divalent ion concentrations drive an abrupt switch between a bridging and non-bridging DNA-binding mode. Similarly, synergistic and antagonistic co-regulators modulate the DNA-bridging efficiency. Structural studies suggest a conserved mechanism: H-NS switches between a ‘closed’ and an ‘open’, bridging competent, conformation driven by environmental cues and interaction partners., eLife digest The genetic information every cell needs to work properly is encoded in molecules of DNA that are much longer than the cell itself. A key challenge in biology is to understand how DNA is organized to fit inside each cell, whilst still providing access to the information that it contains. Since the way DNA is organized can influence which genes are active, rearranging DNA plays an important role in controlling how cells behave. In Escherichia coli and many other bacteria, a protein called H-NS contributes to DNA reorganization by forming or rupturing loops in the DNA in response to changes in temperature, the levels of salt and other aspects of the cell’s surroundings. In controlling loop formation, it dictates whether specific genes are switched on or off. However, it remains unclear how H-NS detects the environmental changes. To address this question, van der Valk et al. used biochemical techniques to study the activity of H-NS from E. coli under different environmental conditions. The experiments show that changes in the environment cause structural changes to H-NS, altering its ability to form DNA loops. A previously unnoticed region of the protein acts as a switch to control these structural changes, and ultimately affects which genes are active in the cell. These findings shed new light on how bacteria organize their DNA and the strategies they have developed to adapt to different environments. The new protein region identified in H-NS may also be present in similar proteins found in other organisms. In the future, this knowledge may ultimately help to develop new antibiotic drugs that target H-NS proteins in bacteria.

The helical structure of double-stranded DNA is destabilized by increasing temperature. Above a critical temperature (the melting temperature), the two strands in duplex DNA become fully separated. Below this temperature, the structural effects are localized. Using tethered particle motion in a temperature-controlled sample chamber, we systematically investigated the effect of increasing temperature on DNA structure and the interplay between this effect and protein binding. Our measurements revealed that (1) increasing temperature enhances DNA flexibility, effectively leading to more compact folding of the double-stranded DNA chain, and (2) temperature differentially affects different types of DNA-bending chromatin proteins from mesophilic and thermophilic organisms. Thus, our findings aid in understanding genome organization in organisms thriving at moderate as well as extreme temperatures. Moreover, our results underscore the importance of carefully controlling and measuring temperature in single-molecule DNA (micromanipulation) experiments.

Bacteria frequently need to adapt to altered environmental conditions. Adaptation requires changes in gene expression, often mediated by global regulators of transcription. The nucleoid-associated protein H-NS is a key global regulator inGram-negative bacteria, and is believed to be a crucial player in bacterial chromatin organization via its DNA bridging activity. H-NS activityin vivois modulated by physico-chemical factors (osmolarity, pH, temperature) and interaction partners. Mechanistically it is unclear how functional modulation of H-NS by such factors is achieved. Here, we show that a diverse spectrum of H-NS modulators alter the ability of H-NS to bridge DNA. Changes in monovalent and divalent ion concentrations drive an abrupt switch between a bridging and non-bridging DNA binding mode. Similarly, synergistic and antagonistic co-regulators modulate the DNA bridging efficiency. Structural studies suggest a conserved mechanism: H-NS switches between a “closed” and an “open”, bridging competent, conformation driven by environmental cues and interaction partners.

Repairing damaged DNA is essential for an organism’s survival. UV damage endonuclease (UVDE) is a DNA-repair enzyme that can recognize and incise different types of damaged DNA. We present the structure of Sulfolobus acidocaldarius UVDE on its own and in a pre-catalytic complex with UV-damaged DNA containing a 6-4 photoproduct showing a novel ‘dual dinucleotide flip’ mechanism for recognition of damaged dipyrimidines: the two purines opposite to the damaged pyrimidine bases are flipped into a dipurine-specific pocket, while the damaged bases are also flipped into another cleft.

Sso10a proteins are small DNA-binding proteins expressed by the crenarchaeal model organism Sulfolobus solfataricus. Based on the structure of Sso10a1, which contains a winged helix-turn-helix motif, it is believed that Sso10a proteins function as sequence-specific transcription factors. Here we show that Sso10a1 and Sso10a2 exhibit different distinct DNA-binding modes. While the ability to bend DNA is shared between the two proteins, DNA bridging is observed only for Sso10a1 and only Sso10a2 exhibits filament formation along DNA. The architectural properties of Sso10a proteins suggest that these proteins fulfil generic roles in chromatin organization and compaction. As these proteins exhibit different binding behaviour depending on their DNA binding stoichiometry, altered levels of expression in the cell can be exploited to drive changes in local genome folding, which may operate to modulate transcription.

Dormancy is a state of growth cessation that allows bacteria to escape the host defense system and antibiotic challenge. Understanding the mechanisms that control dormancy is of key importance for the treatment of latent infections, such as those from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In mycobacteria, dormancy is controlled by the response regulator DevR, which responds to conditions of hypoxia. Here, we show that OsdR of Streptomyces coelicolor recognizes the same regulatory element and controls a regulon that consists of genes involved in the control of stress and development. Only the core regulon in the direct vicinity of dosR and osdR is conserved between M. tuberculosis and S. coelicolor, respectively. Thus, we show how the system has diverged from allowing escape from the host defense system by mycobacteria to the control of sporulation by complex multicellular streptomycetes. This provides novel insights into how bacterial growth and development are coordinated with the environmental conditions., Two-component regulatory systems allow bacteria to respond adequately to changes in their environment. In response to a given stimulus, a sensory kinase activates its cognate response regulator via reversible phosphorylation. The response regulator DevR activates a state of dormancy under hypoxia in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, allowing this pathogen to escape the host defense system. Here, we show that OsdR (SCO0204) of the soil bacterium Streptomyces coelicolor is a functional orthologue of DevR. OsdR, when activated by the sensory kinase OsdK (SCO0203), binds upstream of the DevR-controlled dormancy genes devR, hspX, and Rv3134c of M. tuberculosis. In silico analysis of the S. coelicolor genome combined with in vitro DNA binding studies identified many binding sites in the genomic region around osdR itself and upstream of stress-related genes. This binding correlated well with transcriptomic responses, with deregulation of developmental genes and genes related to stress and hypoxia in the osdR mutant. A peak in osdR transcription in the wild-type strain at the onset of aerial growth correlated with major changes in global gene expression. Taken together, our data reveal the existence of a dormancy-related regulon in streptomycetes which plays an important role in the transcriptional control of stress- and development-related genes. IMPORTANCE Dormancy is a state of growth cessation that allows bacteria to escape the host defense system and antibiotic challenge. Understanding the mechanisms that control dormancy is of key importance for the treatment of latent infections, such as those from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In mycobacteria, dormancy is controlled by the response regulator DevR, which responds to conditions of hypoxia. Here, we show that OsdR of Streptomyces coelicolor recognizes the same regulatory element and controls a regulon that consists of genes involved in the control of stress and development. Only the core regulon in the direct vicinity of dosR and osdR is conserved between M. tuberculosis and S. coelicolor, respectively. Thus, we show how the system has diverged from allowing escape from the host defense system by mycobacteria to the control of sporulation by complex multicellular streptomycetes. This provides novel insights into how bacterial growth and development are coordinated with the environmental conditions.

The UvrA protein is the initial DNA damage-sensing protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair and detects a wide variety of structurally unrelated lesions. After initial recognition of DNA damage, UvrA loads the UvrB protein onto the DNA. This protein then verifies the presence of a lesion, after which UvrA is released from the DNA. UvrA contains two ATPase domains, both belonging to the ABC ATPase superfamily. We have determined the activities of two mutants, in which a single domain was deactivated. Inactivation of either one ATPase domain in Escherichia coli UvrA results in a complete loss of ATPase activity, indicating that both domains function in a cooperative way. We could show that this ATPase activity is not required for the recognition of bulky lesions by UvrA, but it does promote the specific binding to the less distorting cyclobutane-pyrimidine dimer (CPD). The two ATPase mutants also show a difference in UvrB-loading, depending on the length of the DNA substrate. The ATPase domain I mutant was capable of loading UvrB on a lesion in a 50 bp fragment, but this loading was reduced on a longer substrate. For the ATPase domain II mutant the opposite was found: UvrB could not be loaded on a 50 bp substrate, but this loading was rescued when the length of the fragment was increased. This differential loading of UvrB by the two ATPase mutants could be related to different interactions between the UvrA and UvrB subunits.

UV damage endonuclease (UVDE) from Schizosaccharomyces pombe initiates repair of UV lesions and abasic sites by nicking the DNA 5' to the damaged site. In this paper we show that in addition UVDE incises DNA containing a single-strand nick or gap, but that the enzymatic activity on these substrates as well as on abasic sites strongly depends on the presence of a neighbouring pyrimidine residue. This indicates that, although UVDE may have been derived from an ancestral AP endonuclease its major substrate is a UV lesion and not an AP site. We propose that UVDE rotates two nucleotides into a pocket of the protein in order to bring the scissile bond close to the active site and that purine bases are excluded from this pocket. We also show that in the DNA complex residue Tyr-358 of UVDE penetrates the DNA helix causing unstacking of two residues opposite the lesion, thereby stabilizing the protein-DNA interaction, most likely by promoting bending of the DNA. In the absence of Tyr-358 the enzyme exhibits an increased catalytic activity on UV-induced lesions, but only at a lower pH of 6.5. At physiological conditions (pH 7.5) the mutant protein completely looses its catalytic activity although it can still bind to the DNA. We propose that in addition to stabilizing the bend in the DNA the hydrophobic side chain of Tyr-358 shields the active site from exposure to the solvent.

Helicases play critical roles in all aspects of nucleic acid metabolism by catalyzing the remodeling of DNA and RNA structures. UvrD is an abundant helicase in Escherichia coli with well characterized functions in mismatch and nucleotide excision repair and a possible role in displacement of proteins such as RecA from single-stranded DNA. The mismatch repair protein MutL is known to stimulate UvrD. Here we show that the nucleotide excision repair proteins UvrA and UvrB can together stimulate UvrD-catalyzed unwinding of a range of DNA substrates containing strand discontinuities, including forked DNA substrates. The stimulation is specific for UvrD, as UvrAB failed to stimulate Rep helicase, a UvrD homologue. Moreover, although UvrAB can promote limited strand displacement, stimulation of UvrD did not require the strand displacement function of UvrAB. We conclude that UvrAB, like MutL, modulate UvrD helicase activity. This stimulation likely plays a role in DNA strand and protein displacement by UvrD in nucleotide excision repair. Promotion of UvrD-catalyzed unwinding of nicked duplexes by UvrAB may also explain the need for UvrAB and UvrD in Okazaki fragment processing in cells lacking DNA polymerase I. More generally, these data support the idea that helicase activity is regulated in vivo, with helicases acting as part of multisubunit complexes rather than in isolation.

The UvrA protein is the initial damage-recognizing factor in bacterial nucleotide excision repair. Each monomer of the UvrA dimer contains two ATPase sites. Using single-molecule analysis we show that dimerization of UvrA in the presence of ATP is significantly higher than with ADP or nonhydrolyzable ATPgammaS, suggesting that the active UvrA dimer contains a mixture of ADP and ATP. We also show that the UvrA dimer has a high preference of binding the end of a linear DNA fragment, independent on the presence or type of cofactor. Apparently ATP binding or hydrolysis is not needed to discriminate between DNA ends and internal sites. A significant number of complexes could be detected where one UvrA dimer bridges two DNA ends implying the presence of two separate DNA-binding domains, most likely present in each monomer. On DNA containing a site-specific lesion the damage-specific binding is much higher than DNA-end binding, but only in the absence of cofactor or with ATP. With ATPgammaS no discrimination between a DNA end and a DNA damage could be observed. We present a model where damage recognition of UvrA depends on the ability of both UvrA monomers to interact with the DNA flanking the lesion.

UvrB is the main damage recognition protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair and is capable of recognizing various structurally unrelated types of damage. Previously we have shown that upon binding of Escherichia coli UvrB to damaged DNA two nucleotides become extrahelical: the nucleotide directly 3' to the lesion and its base-pairing partner in the non-damaged strand. Here we demonstrate using a novel fluorescent 2-aminopurine-menthol modification that the position of the damaged nucleotide itself does not change upon UvrB binding. A co-crystal structure of B. caldotenax UvrB and DNA has revealed that one nucleotide is flipped out of the DNA helix into a pocket of the UvrB protein where it stacks on Phe249 [J.J. Truglio, E. Karakas, B. Hau, H. Wang, M.J. DellaVecchia, B. van Houten, C. Kisker, Structural basis for DNA recognition and processing by UvrB, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13 (2006) 360-364]. By mutating the equivalent of Phe249 (Tyr249) in the E. coli UvrB protein we show that on damaged DNA neither of the extrahelical nucleotides is inserted into this protein pocket. The mutant UvrB protein, however, resulted in an increased binding and incision of undamaged DNA showing that insertion of a base into the nucleotide-binding pocket is important for dissociation of UvrB from undamaged sites. Replacing the nucleotides in the non-damaged strand with a C3-linker revealed that the extruded base in the non-damaged strand is not directly involved in UvrB-binding or UvrC-mediated incision, but that its displacement is needed to allow access for residues of UvrB or UvrC to the neighboring base, which is directly opposite the DNA damage. This interaction is shown to be essential for optimal 3'-incision by UvrC. After 3'-incision base flipping in the non-damaged DNA strand is lost, indicative for a conformational change needed to prepare the UvrB-DNA complex for 5'-incision.

From the start of the first primitive life forms on earth ultraviolet (UV) light has been a seriously threatening factor. UV light is absorbed by the DNA causing several types of damage that can interfere with transcription and replication. In bacteria a number of different repair mechanisms have evolved to repair these UV-induced lesions. These mechanisms include direct reversal of the damage by a photolyase (photoreactivation), removing of the damaged base by a DNA glycosylase (base excision repair, BER), incision of the DNA adjacent to the damage by an endonuclease (UV-damage endonuclease, UVDE) or removal of a complete oligonucleotide containing the damage (nucleotide excision repair, NER). This paper presents an inventory of genes encoding enzymes involved in these repair pathways based on the analysis of complete genome sequences of a large number of eubacteria and archaebacteria. From the comparison of homologous sequences between the different species a picture emerges how the repair systems have been transmitted during evolution. In addition, a comparative analysis of amino acid sequences of homologous proteins allows the prediction of specific functions in as yet uncharacterized proteins or protein domains.

UvrB plays a key role in bacterial nucleotide excision repair. It is the ultimate damage-binding protein that interacts with both UvrA and UvrC. The oligomeric state of UvrB and the UvrAB complex have been subject of debate for a long time. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between GFP and YFP fused to the C-terminal end of Escherichia coli UvrB, we unambiguously show that in solution two UvrB subunits bind to UvrA, most likely as part of a UvrA2B2 complex. This complex is most stable when both UvrA and UvrB are in the ATP-bound form. Analysis of a truncated form of UvrB shows that binding to UvrA promotes dimerization of the two C-terminal domain 4 regions of UvrB. The presence of undamaged DNA leads to dissociation of the UvrA2B2 complex, but when the ATPase site of UvrB is inactivated, the complex is trapped on the DNA. When the complex is bound to a damaged site, FRET between the two UvrB subunits could still be detected, but only as long as UvrA remains associated. Dissociation of UvrA from the damage-bound UvrB dimer leads to the reduction of the magnitude of the FRET signal, indicating that the domain 4 regions no longer interact. We propose that the UvrA-induced dimerization of the domain 4 regions serves to shield these domains from premature UvrC binding. Only after specific binding of the UvrB dimer to a damaged site and subsequent release of UvrA is the contact between the domain 4 regions broken, allowing recruitment of UvrC and subsequent incisions.

UvrB is the ultimate damage-binding protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair. Previous AFM experiments have indicated that UvrB binds to a damage as a dimer. In this paper we visualize for the first time a UvrB dimer in a gel retardation assay, with the second subunit (B2) more loosely bound than the subunit (B1) that interacts with the damage. A β-hairpin motif in UvrB plays an important role in damage specific binding. Alanine substitutions of Y92 or Y93 in the β-hairpin result in proteins that kill E. coli cells as a consequence of incision in non-damaged DNA. Apparently, both residues are needed to prevent binding of UvrB to non-damaged DNA. The lethality of Y93A results from UvrC-mediated incisions, whereas that of Y92A is due to incisions by Cho. This difference could be ascribed to a difference in stability of the B2 subunit in the mutant UvrB–DNA complexes. We show that for 3′ incision UvrC needs to displace this second UvrB subunit from the complex, whereas Cho seems capable to incise the dimer-complex. Footprint analysis of the contacts of UvrB with damaged DNA revealed that the B2 subunit interacts with the flanking DNA at the 3′ side of the lesion. The B2 subunit of mutant Y92A appeared to be more firmly associated with the DNA, indicating that even when B1 is bound to a lesion, the B2 subunit probes the adjacent DNA for presence of damage. We propose this to be a reflection of the process that the UvrB dimer uses to find lesions in the DNA. In addition to preventing binding to non-damaged DNA, the Y92 and Y93 residues appear also important for making specific contacts (of B1) with the damaged site. We show that the concerted action of the two tyrosines lead to a conformational change in the DNA surrounding the lesion, which is required for the 3′ incision reaction.

Nucleotide excision repair removes damages from the DNA by incising the damaged strand on the 3′ and 5′ sides of the lesion. In Escherichia coli , the two incisions are made by the UvrC protein, which consists of two functional halves. The N-terminal half contains the catalytic site for 3′ incision and the C-terminal half contains the residues involved in 5′ incision. The genome of E. coli contains an SOS-inducible gene ( ydjQ ) encoding a protein that is homologous to the N-terminal half of UvrC. In this paper we show that this protein, which we refer to as Cho (UvrC homologue), can incise the DNA at the 3′ side of a lesion during nucleotide excision repair. The incision site of Cho is located 4 nt further away from the damage compared with the 3′ incision site of UvrC. Cho and UvrC bind to different domains of UvrB, which is probably the reason of the shift in incision position. Some damaged substrates that are poorly incised by UvrC are very efficiently incised by Cho. We propose that E. coli uses Cho for repair of such damages in vivo . Initially, most of the lesions in the cell will be repaired by the action of UvrC alone. Remaining damages, that for structural reasons obstruct the 3′ incision by UvrC, will be repaired by the combined action of Cho (for 3′ incision) and UvrC (for 5′ incision).

The solution structure, thermodynamic stability and hydrodynamic properties of the 55-residue C-terminal domain of UvrB that interacts with UvrC during excision repair in E. coli have been determined using a combination of high resolution NMR, ultracentrifugation, 15N NMR relaxation, gel permeation, NMR diffusion, circular dichroism and differential scanning calorimetry. The subunit molecular weight is 7,438 kDa., compared with 14.5+/-1.0 kDa. determined by equilibrium sedimentation, indicating a dimeric structure. The structure determined from NMR showed a stable dimer of anti-parallel helical hairpins that associate in an unusual manner, with a small and hydrophobic interface. The Stokes radius of the protein decreases from a high plateau value (ca. 22 A) at protein concentrations greater than 4 microM to about 18 A at concentrations less than 0.1 microM. The concentration and temperature-dependence of the far UV circular dichroism show that the protein is thermally stable (Tm ca. 71.5 degrees C at 36 microM). The simplest model consistent with these data was a dimer dissociating into folded monomers that then unfolds co-operatively. The van't Hoff enthalpy and dissociation constant for both transition was derived by fitting, with deltaH1=23 kJ mol(-1). K1(298)=0.4 microM and deltaH2= 184 kJ mol(-1). This is in good agreement with direct calorimetric analysis of the thermal unfolding of the protein, which gave a calorimetric enthalpy change of 181 kJ mol(-1) and a van't Hoff enthalpy change of 354 kJ mol(-1), confirming the dimer to monomer unfolding. The thermodynamic data can be reconciled with the observed mode of dimerisation. 15N NMR relaxation measurements at 14.1 T and 11.75 T confirmed that the protein behaves as an asymmetric dimer at mM concentrations, with a flexible N-terminal linker for attachment to the remainder of the UvrB protein. The role of dimerisation of this domain in the excision repair mechanism is discussed.

The UvrB-DNA preincision complex plays a key role in nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli. To study the formation of this complex, derivatives of a DNA substrate containing a cholesterol adduct were constructed. Introduction of a single strand nick into either the top or the bottom strand at the 3' side of the adduct stabilized the UvrB-DNA complex, most likely by the release of local stress in the DNA. Removal of both DNA strands up to the 3' incision site still allowed formation of the preincision complex. Similar modifications at the 5' side of the damage, however, gave different results. The introduction of a single strand nick at the 5' incision site completely abolished the UvrA-mediated formation of the UvrB-DNA complex. Deletion of both DNA strands up to the 5' incision site also prevented the UvrA-mediated loading of UvrB onto the damaged site, but UvrB by itself could bind very efficiently. This demonstrates that the UvrB protein is capable of recognizing damage without the matchmaker function of the UvrA protein. Our results also indicate that the UvrA-mediated loading of the UvrB protein is an asymmetric process, which starts at the 5' side of the damage.

We have isolated UvrB-DNA complexes by capture of biotinylated damaged DNA substrates on streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. With this method the UvrB-DNA preincision complex remains stable even in the absence of ATP. For the binding of UvrC to the UvrB-DNA complex no cofactor is needed. The subsequent induction of 3' incision does require ATP binding by UvrB but not hydrolysis. This ATP binding induces a conformational change in the DNA, resulting in the appearance of the DNase I-hypersensitive site at the 5' side of the damage. In contrast, the 5' incision is not dependent on ATP binding because it occurs with the same efficiency with ADP. We show with competition experiments that both incision reactions are induced by the binding of the same UvrC molecule. A DNA substrate containing damage close to the 5' end of the damaged strand is specifically bound by UvrB in the absence of UvrA and ATP (Moolenaar, G. F., Monaco, V., van der Marel, G. A., van Boom, J. H., Visse, R., and Goosen, N. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 8038-8043). To initiate the formation of an active UvrBC-DNA incision complex, however, UvrB first needs to hydrolyze ATP, and subsequently a new ATP molecule must be bound. Implications of these findings for the mechanism of the UvrA-mediated formation of the UvrB-DNA preincision complex will be discussed.

The nicking of damaged DNA during the nucleotide excision repair reaction in E. coli, is the result of a multi-step process involving three enzymes, UvrA, UvrB and UvrC. The UvrB protein is loaded on the site of the damage by UvrA, forming a stable UvrB-DNA complex. This complex is recognized by UvrC and in the resulting UvrBC-DNA complex dual incision takes place, first on the 3'-side and next on the 5'-side of the damaged nucleotide. A domain in the C-terminal part of UvrB has been identified to be essential for formation of the specific UvrBC-DNA complex that induces the 3'-incision [1]. The N-terminal half of UvrC contains a region that is homologous to this C-terminal domain of UvrB. Using site-directed mutagenesis of a conserved phenylalanine in the homologous regions of UvrB and UvrC two mutants were constructed, UvrB(F652L) and UvrC(F223L). Both proteins were tested in vitro using a DNA substrate with a defined cisplatin lesion. The protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions were studied using bandshift assays and DNAse I footprinting. We show that both domains are important for the binding of UvrC to the UvrB-DNA complex.

Architectural proteins play an important role in organizing and compacting the genome in all three kingdoms of life. Archaeal chromatin proteins show similarities with both bacterial and eukaryotic chromatin proteins.The thermophilic model organism Sulfolobus expresses four different chromatin proteins: Cren7, Sul7, Alba and Sso10a. To characterize the architectural properties of these proteins we use a single-molecule approach. We have observed that these proteins are all able to compact DNA, exhibiting different sets of binding modes. In addition to DNA compaction and organization, these proteins are believed to play an important role in maintaining genome integrity at high environmental temperatures. High temperature single-molecule measurements showed how DNA structure is affected by temperature and how chromatin proteins affect DNA stability at these temperatures.View Large Image | View Hi-Res Image | Download PowerPoint Slide

The UvrABC endonuclease from Escherichia coli repairs a broad spectrum of DNA lesions with variable efficiencies. The effectiveness of repair is influenced by the nature of the lesion, the local DNA sequence, and/or the topology of the DNA. To get a better understanding of the aspects of this multistep repair reaction that determine the effectiveness of repair, we compared the incision efficiencies of linear DNA fragments containing either a site-specific cis-[Pt(NH3)2(d(GpG)-N7(1),-N7(2)]] or a cis- Pt(NH3)2[d(GpCpG)-N7(1),-N7(3)]] adduct. Overall the DNA with the cis-PtGG adduct was incised about 3.5 times more efficiently than the cis-Pt.GCG-containing DNA. The rate of UvrB-DNA preincision complex formation for both lesions was similar and high in relation to the incision. DNase I footprints, however, showed that the local structure of the two preincision complexes is different. An assay was developed to measure the binding of UvrC to the preincision complexes and it was found that the binding rate of UvrC to the more slowly incised cis-Pt.GCG preincision complex was higher than to the cis-Pt.GG preincision complex. This most likely reflects a qualitative difference in preincision complex structures. For both lesions the binding of UvrC to the preincision complex was fast compared to the kinetics of actual incision. Apparently, direct incision of cisplatin damage requires an additional conformational change after the binding of UvrC.

UvrA is the initial DNA damage-sensing protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair. Each protomer of the UvrA dimer contains two ATPase domains, that belong to the family of ATP-binding cassette domains. Three structural domains are inserted in these ATPase domains: the insertion domain (ID) and UvrB binding domain (in ATP domain I) and the zinc-finger motif (in ATP domain II). In this paper we analyze the function of the ID and the zinc finger motif in damage specific binding of Escherichia coli UvrA. We show that the ID is not essential for damage discrimination, but it does stabilize UvrA on the DNA, most likely by forming a clamp around the DNA helix. We present evidence that two conserved arginine residues in the ID contact the phosphate backbone of the DNA, leading to strand separation after the ATPase-driven movement of the ID's. Remarkably, deletion of the ID generated a phenotype in which UV-survival strongly depends on the presence of photolyase, indicating that UvrA and photolyase form a ternary complex on a CPD-lesion. The zinc-finger motif is shown to be important for the transfer of the damage recognition signal to the ATPase of UvrA. In the absence of this domain the coupling between DNA binding and ATP hydrolysis is completely lost. Mutation of the phenylalanine residue in the tip of the zinc-finger domain resulted in a protein in which the ATPase was already triggered when binding to an undamaged site. As the zinc-finger motif is connected to the DNA binding regions on the surface of UvrA, this strongly suggests that damage-specific binding to these regions results in a rearrangement of the zinc-finger motif, which in its turn activates the ATPase. We present a model how damage recognition is transmitted to activate ATP hydrolysis in ATP binding domain I of the protein.

One of the least understood steps in the UvrABC mediated excision repair process is the recognition of lesions in the DNA. The isolation of different reaction intermediates is of vital importance for the unraveling of the mechanism. A mobility shift gel electrophoresis assay is described which visualizes such intermediates. After incubation of a DNA substrate containing a specific cisplatin adduct with UvrA alone or with UvrA and UvrB, UvrA.DNA, UvrAB.DNA and UvrB.DNA complexes were observed which could be identified using specific antibodies. At low UvrA concentrations in the presence of UvrB only the UvrB.DNA complex is observed. Bands corresponding to the UvrAB.DNA complex and also other nonspecific bands are found at relatively high UvrA concentrations. The DNase-I footprint for the UvrAB.- and UvrB.DNA complex are very similar and protect about 20 bases. Both complexes are incised in the presence of UvrC with comparable efficiency. The UvrAB.- and the UvrB.DNA complex were both incised at the 8th phosphodiester bond 5‘ to a specific cisplatin adduct. In addition the UvrAB.DNA complex could also be incised at the 15th phosphodiesterbond 5‘ to the damaged site. The results suggest that the UvrB.DNA complex is the natural substrate for UvrC-induced incision.

SummaryThe ultraviolet damage endonuclease (UVDE) performs the initial step in an alternative excision repair pathway of UV-induced DNA damage, nicking immediately adjacent to the 5′ phosphate of the damaged nucleotides. Unique for a single-protein DNA repair endonuclease, it can detect different types of damage. Here we show that Thermus thermophilus UVDE shares some essential structural features with Endo IV, an enzyme from the base excision repair pathway that exclusively nicks at abasic sites. A comparison between the structures indicates how DNA is bound by UVDE, how UVDE may recognize damage, and which of its residues are involved in catalysis. Furthermore, the comparison suggests an elegant explanation of UVDE's potential to recognize different types of damage. Incision assays including point mutants of UVDE confirmed the relevance of these conclusions.

UvrB, the ultimate damage-binding protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair is capable of binding a vast array of structurally unrelated lesions. A beta-hairpin structure in the protein plays an important role in damage-specific binding. In this paper we have monitored DNA conformational alterations in the UvrB-DNA complex, using the fluorescent adenine analogue 2-aminopurine. We show that binding of UvrB to a DNA fragment with cholesterol damage moves the base adjacent to the lesion at the 3' side into an extrahelical position. This extrahelical base is not accessible for acrylamide quenching, suggesting that it inserts into a pocket of the UvrB protein. Also the base opposite this flipped base is extruded from the DNA helix. The degree of solvent exposure of both residues varies with the type of cofactor (ADP/ATP) bound by UvrB. Fluorescence of the base adjacent to the damage is higher when UvrB is in the ADP-bound configuration, but concomitantly this UvrB-DNA complex is less stable. In the ATP-bound form the UvrB-DNA complex is very stable and in this configuration the base in the non-damaged strand is more exposed. Hairpin residue Tyr-95 is specifically involved in base flipping in the non-damaged strand. We present evidence that this conformational change in the non-damaged strand is important for 3' incision by UvrC.

It is generally accepted that the damage recognition complex of nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli consists of two UvrA and one UvrB molecule, and that in the preincision complex UvrB binds to the damage as a monomer. Using scanning force microscopy, we show here that the damage recognition complex consists of two UvrA and two UvrB subunits, with the DNA wrapped around one of the UvrB monomers. Upon binding the damage and release of the UvrA subunits, UvrB remains a dimer in the preincision complex. After association with the UvrC protein, one of the UvrB monomers is released. We propose a model in which the presence of two UvrB subunits ensures damage recognition in both DNA strands. Upon binding of the UvrA(2)B(2) complex to a putative damaged site, the DNA wraps around one of the UvrB monomers, which will subsequently probe one of the DNA strands for the presence of a lesion. When no damage is found, the DNA will wrap around the second UvrB subunit, which will check the other strand for aberrations.

Nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli involves formation of the UvrB–DNA complex and subsequent DNA incisions on either site of the damage by UvrC. In this paper, we studied the incision of substrates with different damages in varying sequence contexts. We show that there is not always a correlation between the incision efficiency and the stability of the UvrB–DNA complex. Both stable and unstable UvrB–DNA complexes can be efficiently incised. However some lesions that give rise to stable UvrB–DNA complexes do result in a very low incision. We present evidence that this poor incision is due to sterical hindrance of the damage itself. In its C-terminal region UvrC contains two helix–hairpin–helix (HhH) motifs. Mutational analysis shows that these motifs constitute one functional unit, probably folded as one structural unit; the (HhH)2 domain. This (HhH)2 domain was previously shown to be important for the 5′ incision on a substrate containing a (cis-Pt)·GG adduct, but not for 3′ incision. Here we show that, mainly depending on the sequence context of the lesion, the (HhH)2 domain can be important for 3′ and/or 5′ incision. We propose that the (HhH)2 domain stabilises specific DNA structures required for the two incisions, thereby contributing to the flexibility of the UvrABC repair system.

UvrB, the ultimate damage-recognizing component of bacterial nucleotide excision repair, contains a flexible beta-hairpin rich in hydrophobic residues. We describe the properties of UvrB mutants in which these residues have been mutated. The results show that Y101 and F108 in the tip of the hairpin are important for the strand-separating activity of UvrB, supporting the model that the beta-hairpin inserts between the two DNA strands during the search for DNA damage. Residues Y95 and Y96 at the base of the hairpin have a direct role in damage recognition and are positioned close to the damage in the UvrB-DNA complex. Strikingly, substituting Y92 and Y93 results in a protein that is lethal to the cell. The mutant protein forms pre- incision complexes on non-damaged DNA, indicating that Y92 and Y93 function in damage recognition by preventing UvrB binding to non-damaged sites. We propose a model for damage recognition by UvrB in which, stabilized by the four tyrosines at the base of the hairpin, the damaged nucleotide is flipped out of the DNA helix.

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a major DNA repair mechanism that recognizes a broad range of DNA damages. In Escherichia coli, damage recognition in NER is accomplished by the UvrA and UvrB proteins. We have analysed the structural properties of the different protein-DNA complexes formed by UvrA, UvrB and (damaged) DNA using atomic force microscopy. Analysis of the UvrA(2)B complex in search of damage revealed the DNA to be wrapped around the UvrB protein, comprising a region of about seven helical turns. In the UvrB-DNA pre-incision complex the DNA is wrapped in a similar way and this DNA configuration is dependent on ATP binding. Based on these results, a role for DNA wrapping in damage recognition is proposed. Evidence is presented that DNA wrapping in the pre-incision complex also stimulates the rate of incision by UvrC.

DNA polymerase I (PolI) functions both in nucleotide excision repair (NER) and in the processing of Okazaki fragments that are generated on the lagging strand during DNA replication. Escherichia coli cells completely lacking the PolI enzyme are viable as long as they are grown on minimal medium. Here we show that viability is fully dependent on the presence of functional UvrA, UvrB, and UvrD (helicase II) proteins but does not require UvrC. In contrast, Δ polA cells grow even better when the uvrC gene has been deleted. Apparently UvrA, UvrB, and UvrD are needed in a replication backup system that replaces the PolI function, and UvrC interferes with this alternative replication pathway. With specific mutants of UvrC we could show that the inhibitory effect of this protein is related to its catalytic activity that on damaged DNA is responsible for the 3′ incision reaction. Specific mutants of UvrA and UvrB were also studied for their capacity to support the PolI-independent replication. Deletion of the UvrC-binding domain of UvrB resulted in a phenotype similar to that caused by deletion of the uvrC gene, showing that the inhibitory incision activity of UvrC is mediated via binding to UvrB. A mutation in the N-terminal zinc finger domain of UvrA does not affect NER in vivo or in vitro. The same mutation, however, does give inviability in combination with the Δ polA mutation. Apparently the N-terminal zinc-binding domain of UvrA has specifically evolved for a function outside DNA repair. A model for the function of the UvrA, UvrB, and UvrD proteins in the alternative replication pathway is discussed.

A crystal structure of the C-terminal domain of Escherichia coli UvrB (UvrB′) has been solved to 3.0 Å resolution. The domain adopts a helix-loop-helix fold which is stabilised by the packing of hydrophobic side-chains between helices. From the UvrB′ fold, a model for a domain of UvrC (UvrC′) that has high sequence homology with UvrB′ has been made. In the crystal, a dimerisation of UvrB′ domains is seen involving specific hydrophobic and salt bridge interactions between residues in and close to the loop region of the domain. It is proposed that a homologous mode of interaction may occur between UvrB and UvrC. This interaction is likely to be flexible, potentially spanning >50 Å.

Nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli is a multistep process in which DNA damage is removed by incision of the DNA on both sides of the damage, followed by removal of the oligonucleotide containing the lesion. The two incision reactions take place in a complex of damaged DNA with UvrB and UvrC. It has been shown (Lin, J. -J., and Sancar, A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 17688-17692) that the catalytic site for incision on the 5' side of the damage is located in the UvrC protein. Here we show that the catalytic site for incision on the 3' side is in this protein as well, because substitution R42A abolishes 3' incision, whereas formation of the UvrBC-DNA complex and the 5' incision reaction are unaffected. Arg(42) is part of a region that is homologous to the catalytic domain of the homing endonuclease I-TevI. We propose that the UvrC protein consists of two functional parts, with the N-terminal half for the 3' incision reaction and the C-terminal half containing all the determinants for the 5' incision reaction.

Three new cholesterol-containing phosphoramidites where synthesized and used in automated synthesis of modified DNA fragments. These cholesterol lesions are good substrates for the E. coli UvrABC endonuclease. In vitro they are incised from damaged DNA with higher efficiency in respect with the cholesterol lesions previously published.

The 55 residue C-terminal domain of UvrB that interacts with UvrC during excision repair in Escherichia coli has been expressed and purified as a (His)6 fusion construct. The fragment forms a stable folded domain in solution. Heteronuclear NMR experiments were used to obtain extensive 15N, 13C and 1H NMR assignments. NOESY and chemical shift data showed that the protein comprises two helices from residues 630 to 648 and from 652 to 670. 15N relaxation data also show that the first 11 and last three residues are unstructured. The effective rotational correlation time within the structured region is not consistent with a monomer. This oligomerisation may be relevant to the mode of dimerisation of UvrB with the homologous domain of UvrC.

The incisions in the DNA at the 3'- and 5'-side of a DNA damage during nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli occur in a complex consisting of damaged DNA, UvrB and UvrC. The exact requirements for the two incision events, however, are different. It has previously been shown that the 3'-incision requires the interaction between the C-terminal domain of UvrB and a homologous region in UvrC. This interaction, however, is dispensable for the 5'-incision. Here we show that the C-terminal domain of the UvrC protein is essential for the 5'-incision, whereas this domain can be deleted without affecting the 3'-incision. The C-terminal domain of UvrC is homologous with the C-terminal part of the ERCC1 protein which, in a complex with XPF, is responsible for the 5'-incision reaction in human nucleotide excision repair. Both in the UvrC and the ERCC1 domain a Helix-hairpin-Helix (HhH) motif can be indicated, albeit at different positions. Such a motif also has been found in a large variety of DNA binding proteins and it has been suggested to form a structure involved in non-sequence-specific DNA binding. In contrast to the full length UvrC protein, a truncated UvrC protein (UvrC554) lacking the entire ERCC1 homology including the HhH motif no longer binds to ssDNA. Analysis of protein-DNA complexes using bandshift experiments showed that this putative DNA binding domain of UvrC is required for stabilisation of the UvrBC-DNA complex after the 3'-incision has taken place. We propose that after the initial 3'-incision the HhH motif recognises a specific DNA structure, thereby positioning the catalytic site for the subsequent 5'-incision reaction.

Incision of damaged DNA templates by UvrBC in Escherichia coli depends on UvrA, which loads UvrB on the site of the damage. A 50-base pair 3' prenicked DNA substrate containing a cholesterol lesion is incised by UvrABC at two positions 5' to the lesion, the first incision at the eighth and the second at the 15th phosphodiester bond. Analysis of a 5' prenicked cholesterol substrate revealed that the second 5' incision is efficiently produced by UvrBC independent of UvrA. This UvrBC incision was also found on the same substrate without a lesion and, with an even higher efficiency, on a DNA substrate containing a 5' single strand overhang. Incision occurred in the presence of ATP or ADP but not in the absence of cofactor. We could show an interaction between UvrB and UvrC in solution and subsequent binding of this complex to the substrate with a 5' single strand overhang. Analysis of mutant UvrB and UvrC proteins revealed that the damage-independent nuclease activity requires the protein-protein interaction domains, which are exclusively needed for the 3' incision on damaged substrates. However, the UvrBC incision uses the catalytic site in UvrC which makes the 5' incision on damaged DNA substrates.

Different classes of DNA repair systems exist to counteract the effect of the many forms of DNA damage that are generated by exposure of living cells to ultraviolet or ionising radiation and a variety of chemicals. Of these repair systems the nucleotide excision repair pathway is unique in its ability to recognise and repair a vast array of structurally unrelated DNA lesions (see Van Houten 1990 for review). The principles of nucleotide excision repair are the same in prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. After recognition of a DNA lesion, incisions are made in the damaged strand on both sides of the lesion, the oligonucleotide containing the lesion is removed, and the resulting gap is filled by DNA synthesis followed by ligation of the remaining nick. The proteins involved in the prokaryotic system, however, differ from those of the eukaryotic system, indicating that the two repair processes are not evolutionaryly related. Whereas eukaryotic nucleotide excision repair requires about 30 polypeptides (Sancar 1996), just 6 proteins (UvrA, UvrB, UvrC, UvrD, DNA polymerase (Pol) I and ligase) are sufficient for carrying out the repair process in E. coli.

The UvrABC endonuclease from Escherichia coli repairs damage in the DNA by dual incision of the damaged strand on both sides of the lesion. The incisions are in an ordered fashion, first on the 3′-side and next on the 5′-side of the damage, and they are the result of binding of UvrC to the UvrB-DNA preincision complex. In this paper, we show that at least the C-terminal 24 amino acids of UvrB are involved in interaction with UvrC and that this binding is important for the 3′-incision. The C-terminal region of UvrB, which shows homology with a domain of the UvrC protein, is part of a region that is predicted to be able to form a coiled-coil. We therefore propose that UvrB and UvrC interact through the formation of such a structure. The C-terminal region of UvrB only interacts with UvrC when present in the preincision complex, indicating that the conformational change in UvrB accompanying the formation of this complex exposes the UvrC binding domain. Binding of UvrC to the C-terminal region of UvrB is not important for the 5′-incision, suggesting that for this incision a different interaction of UvrC with the UvrB-DNA complex is required. Truncated UvrB mutants that lack up to 99 amino acids from the C terminus still give rise to significant incision (1-2%), indicating that this C-terminal region of UvrB does not participate in the formation of the active site for 3′-incision. This region, however, contains the residue (Glu-640) that was proposed to be involved in 3′-catalysis, since a mutation of the residue (E640A) fails to promote 3′-incision (Lin, J. J., Phillips, A. M., Hearst, J. E., and Sancar, A.(1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 17693-17700). We have isolated a mutant UvrB with the same E640A substitution, but this protein shows normal UvrC binding and incision in vitro and also results in normal survival after UV irradiation in vivo. As a consequence of these results, it is still an open question as to whether the catalytic site for 3′-incision is located in UvrB, in UvrC, or is formed by both proteins.

The UvrB-DNA preincision complex is a key intermediate in the repair of damaged DNA by the UvrABC endonuclease from Escherichia coli. DNaseI footprinting of this complex on DNA with a cis-[Pt(NH3)2[d(GpG)-N7(1),N7(2)]] adduct provided global information on the protein binding site on this substrate [Visse, R., et al. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 7609-7617]. By applying a method developed by Fairall and Rhodes [Fairall, L., & Rhodes, D. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 4727-4731], who have used the size and shape of DNasI for the interpretation of a footprint, we were able to define in more detail the region where UvrB-DNA interactions in the preincision complex occur. The potential interactions with phosphate groups could be reduced to less then 14 in the damaged and to 12 in the nondamaged strand. The main UvrB-DNA interactions seem restricted to the major groove on both sides of the lesion. As a consequence UvrB crosses the minor groove just downstream of the damage. Such a binding of UvrB orients the protein away from the damage. The more detailed interpretation of UvrB-DNA interactions was supported by methylation protection experiments. The structure of the DNA in the preincision complex formed on cis-[Pt(NH3)2[GpG-N7(1),N7(2)]] is altered as could be shown diethylpyrocarbonate sensitivity of adenines just downstream of the lesion. However the adenines just downstream of another cisplatin adduct, cis-[Pt(NH3)2[d(GpCpG)-N7(1),N7(3)]], did not become diethylpyrocarbonate sensitive in the preincision complex although this complex is incision proficient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The UvrABC endonuclease repairs a variety of structurally different lesions. The preincision complex consisting of UvrB and damaged DNA plays a central role in successful damage recognition by UvrA and UvrB, and is a prerequisite for the subsequent processing in the presence of UvrC, resulting in dual incisions of the DNA. Although there is still an effect on efficiency, the type of lesion seems to have only a minor influence on the mechanism of repair, since incisions occur at fixed distances from each lesion. Therefore, an important aspect of unraveling the molecular mechanisms of UvrABC-dependent DNA repair is to understand how this system is able to process different lesions in a similar way. Attention in this work has been focused on which domains of UvrB are specifically involved in the formation of the UvrB-DNA preincision complex and on the structure of this complex.

The UvrB protein is a subunit of the UvrABC endonuclease which is involved in the repair of a large variety of DNA lesions. We have 91 isolated random uvrB mutants which are impaired in the repair of UV-damage in vivo . These mutants were classified on the basis of the ability to form normal levels of protein and the position of the mutations in the gene. The amino acid substitutions in the N-terminal part or in the C-terminal part of the UvrB protein are exclusively found in the conserved boxes of the so-called "helicase motifs" present in these parts of the protein, indicating that these motifs are essential for UvrB function. The proteins of four C-terminal mutants were purified: two mutants in motif V (E514K and G509S), one mutant in motif VI (R544H) and a double mutant in both motifs (E514K + R541H). In vitro experiments with these mutant proteins show that the helicase motifs V and VI are involved in the induction of ATP hydrolysis in the presence of (damaged) DNA and in the strand-displacement activity of the UvrA 2 B complex as is observed in a helicase assay. Furthermore, our results suggest that this strand-displacement activity is correlated to a local unwinding, which seems to be used to form the UvrB-DNA preincision complex