203 results on '"Gerhard Krinner"'
Search Results
2. First Quantification of the Permafrost Heat Sink in the Earth's Climate System
- Author
-
Jan Nitzbon, Gerhard Krinner, Thomas Schneider von Deimling, Martin Werner, and Moritz Langer
- Subjects
permafrost ,Earth’s energy imbalance ,essential climate variable ,heat sink ,CryoGrid ,land surface model ,Geophysics. Cosmic physics ,QC801-809 - Abstract
Abstract Due to an imbalance between incoming and outgoing radiation at the top of the atmosphere, excess heat has accumulated in Earth's climate system in recent decades, driving global warming and climatic changes. To date, it has not been quantified how much of this excess heat is used to melt ground ice in permafrost. Here, we diagnose changes in sensible and latent ground heat contents in the northern terrestrial permafrost region from ensemble‐simulations of a tailored land surface model. We find that between 1980 and 2018, about 3.9+1.4−1.6 ZJ of heat, of which 1.7+1.3−1.4 ZJ (44%) were used to melt ground ice, were absorbed by permafrost. Our estimate, which does not yet account for the potentially increased heat uptake due to thermokarst processes in ice‐rich terrain, suggests that permafrost is a persistent heat sink comparable in magnitude to other components of the cryosphere and must be explicitly considered when assessing Earth's energy imbalance.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. The hazard components of representative key risks. The physical climate perspective
- Author
-
Claudia Tebaldi, Guðfinna Aðalgeirsdóttir, Sybren Drijfhout, John Dunne, Tamsin L. Edwards, Erich Fischer, John C. Fyfe, Richard G. Jones, Robert E. Kopp, Charles Koven, Gerhard Krinner, Friederike Otto, Alex C. Ruane, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Jana Sillmann, Sophie Szopa, and Prodromos Zanis
- Subjects
Meteorology. Climatology ,QC851-999 - Abstract
The framework of Representative Key Risks (RKRs) has been adopted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group II (WGII) to categorize, assess and communicate a wide range of regional and sectoral key risks from climate change. These are risks expected to become severe due to the potentially detrimental convergence of changing climate conditions with the exposure and vulnerability of human and natural systems. Other papers in this special issue treat each of eight RKRs holistically by assessing their current status and future evolution as a result of this convergence. However, in these papers, such assessment cannot always be organized according to a systematic gradation of climatic changes. Often the big-picture evolution of risk has to be extrapolated from either qualitative effects of “low”, “medium” and “high” warming, or limited/focused analysis of the consequences of particular mitigation choices (e.g., benefits of limiting warming to 1.5 or 2C), together with consideration of the socio-economic context and possible adaptation choices.In this study we offer a representation – as systematic as possible given current literature and assessments – of the future evolution of the hazard components of RKRs.We identify the relevant hazards for each RKR, based upon the WGII authors’ assessment, and we report on their current state and expected future changes in magnitude, intensity and/or frequency, linking these changes to Global Warming Levels (GWLs) to the extent possible. We draw on the assessment of changes in climatic impact-drivers relevant to RKRs described in the 6th Assessment Report by Working Group I supplemented when needed by more recent literature.For some of these quantities - like regional trends in oceanic and atmospheric temperature and precipitation, some heat and precipitation extremes, permafrost thaw and Northern Hemisphere snow cover - a strong and quantitative relationship with increasing GWLs has been identified. For others - like frequency and intensity of tropical cyclones and extra-tropical storms, and fire weather - that link can only be described qualitatively. For some processes - like the behavior of ice sheets, or changes in circulation dynamics - large uncertainties about the effects of different GWLs remain, and for a few others - like ocean pH and air pollution - the composition of the scenario of anthropogenic emissions is most relevant, rather than the warming reached. In almost all cases, however, the basic message remains that every small increment in CO2 concentration in the atmosphere and associated warming will bring changes in climate phenomena that will contribute to increasing risk of impacts on human and natural systems, in the absence of compensating changes in these systems’ exposure and vulnerability, and in the absence of effective adaptation. Our picture of the evolution of RKR-relevant climatic impact-drivers complements and enriches the treatment of RKRs in the other papers in at least two ways: by filling in their often only cursory or limited representation of the physical climate aspects driving impacts, and by providing a fuller representation of their future potential evolution, an important component – if never the only one – of the future evolution of risk severity.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Historically-based run-time bias corrections substantially improve model projections of 100 years of future climate change
- Author
-
Gerhard Krinner, Viatcheslav Kharin, Romain Roehrig, John Scinocca, and Francis Codron
- Subjects
Geology ,QE1-996.5 ,Environmental sciences ,GE1-350 - Abstract
Empirical bias corrections in climate models based on historical data improve future projections of climate change, even in strong change over 100 years, suggest experiments with three climate models.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Controls of soil organic matter on soil thermal dynamics in the northern high latitudes
- Author
-
Dan Zhu, Philippe Ciais, Gerhard Krinner, Fabienne Maignan, Albert Jornet Puig, and Gustaf Hugelius
- Subjects
Science - Abstract
Soils in the northern permafrost region contain large quantities of organic carbon, formed over long time scales under cold climates. Here the authors test a number of soil properties and show that soil organic carbon is the dominant factor controlling thermal diffusivity among 200 sites in high latitude regions.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Modeling the Vegetation Dynamics of Northern Shrubs and Mosses in the ORCHIDEE Land Surface Model
- Author
-
Arsène Druel, Philippe Ciais, Gerhard Krinner, and Philippe Peylin
- Subjects
land surface ,modeling ,dynamical vegetation ,boreal ,Arctic greening ,competition ,Physical geography ,GB3-5030 ,Oceanography ,GC1-1581 - Abstract
Abstract Parameterizations of plant competition processes involving shrubs, mosses, grasses, and trees were introduced with the recently implemented shrubs and mosses plant functional types in the ORCHIDEE dynamic global vegetation model in order to improve the representation of high latitude vegetation dynamics. Competition is based on light capture for growth, net primary productivity, and survival to cold‐induced mortality during winter. Trees are assumed to outcompete shrubs and grasses for light, and shrubs outcompete grasses. Shrubs are modeled to have a higher survival than trees to extremely cold winters because of thermic protection by snow. The fractional coverage of each plant type is based on their respective net primary productivity and winter mortality of trees and shrubs. Gridded simulations were carried out for the historical period and the 21st century following the RCP4.5 and 8.5 scenarios. We evaluate the simulated present‐day vegetation with an observation‐based distribution map and literature data of boreal shrubs. The simulation produces a realistic present‐day boreal vegetation distribution, with shrubs, mosses north of trees and grasses. Nevertheless, the model underestimated local shrub expansion compared to observations from selected sites in the Arctic during the last 30 years suggesting missing processes (nutrients and microscale effects). The RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 projections show a substantial decrease of bare soil, an increase in tree and moss cover and an increase of shrub net primary productivity. Finally, the impact of new vegetation types and associated processes is discussed in the context of climate feedbacks.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Empirical Run‐Time Bias Correction for Antarctic Regional Climate Projections With a Stretched‐Grid AGCM
- Author
-
Gerhard Krinner, Julien Beaumet, Vincent Favier, Michel Déqué, and Claire Brutel‐Vuilmet
- Subjects
bias correction ,climate modeling ,regional climate ,Physical geography ,GB3-5030 ,Oceanography ,GC1-1581 - Abstract
Abstract This work presents snapshot simulations of the late 20th and late 21st century Antarctic climate under the RCP8.5 scenario carried out with an empirically bias‐corrected global atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM), forced with bias‐corrected sea‐surface temperatures and sea ice and run with about 100‐km resolution over Antarctica. The bias correction substantially improves the simulated mean late 20th century climate. The simulated atmospheric circulation of the bias‐corrected model compares very favorably to the best available AMIP (Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project)‐type climate models. The simulated interannual circulation variability is improved by the bias correction. Depending on the metric, a slight improvement or degradation is found in the simulated variability on synoptic timescales. The simulated climate change over the 21st century is broadly similar in the corrected and uncorrected versions of the atmospheric model, and atmospheric circulation patterns are not geographically “pinned” by the applied bias correction. These results suggest that the method presented here can be used for bias‐corrected climate projections. Finally, the authors discuss different possible choices in terms of the place of bias corrections and other intermediate steps in the modeling chain leading from global coupled climate simulations to impact assessment.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Twenty first century changes in Antarctic and Southern Ocean surface climate in CMIP6
- Author
-
Thomas J. Bracegirdle, Gerhard Krinner, Marcos Tonelli, F. Alexander Haumann, Kaitlin A. Naughten, Thomas Rackow, Lettie A. Roach, and Ilana Wainer
- Subjects
Antarctic ,climate ,CMIP6 ,projection ,Southern Ocean ,westerlies ,Meteorology. Climatology ,QC851-999 - Abstract
Abstract Two decades into the 21st century there is growing evidence for global impacts of Antarctic and Southern Ocean climate change. Reliable estimates of how the Antarctic climate system would behave under a range of scenarios of future external climate forcing are thus a high priority. Output from new model simulations coordinated as part of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) provides an opportunity for a comprehensive analysis of the latest generation of state‐of‐the‐art climate models following a wider range of experiment types and scenarios than previous CMIP phases. Here the main broad‐scale 21st century Antarctic projections provided by the CMIP6 models are shown across four forcing scenarios: SSP1‐2.6, SSP2‐4.5, SSP3‐7.0 and SSP5‐8.5. End‐of‐century Antarctic surface‐air temperature change across these scenarios (relative to 1995–2014) is 1.3, 2.5, 3.7 and 4.8°C. The corresponding proportional precipitation rate changes are 8, 16, 24 and 31%. In addition to these end‐of‐century changes, an assessment of scenario dependence of pathways of absolute and global‐relative 21st century projections is conducted. Potential differences in regional response are of particular relevance to coastal Antarctica, where, for example, ecosystems and ice shelves are highly sensitive to the timing of crossing of key thresholds in both atmospheric and oceanic conditions. Overall, it is found that the projected changes over coastal Antarctica do not scale linearly with global forcing. We identify two factors that appear to contribute: (a) a stronger global‐relative Southern Ocean warming in stabilisation (SSP2‐4.5) and aggressive mitigation (SSP1‐2.6) scenarios as the Southern Ocean continues to warm and (b) projected recovery of Southern Hemisphere stratospheric ozone and its effect on the mid‐latitude westerlies. The major implication is that over coastal Antarctica, the surface warming by 2100 is stronger relative to the global mean surface warming for the low forcing compared to high forcing future scenarios.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Presentation and Evaluation of the IPSL‐CM6A‐LR Climate Model
- Author
-
Olivier Boucher, Jérôme Servonnat, Anna Lea Albright, Olivier Aumont, Yves Balkanski, Vladislav Bastrikov, Slimane Bekki, Rémy Bonnet, Sandrine Bony, Laurent Bopp, Pascale Braconnot, Patrick Brockmann, Patricia Cadule, Arnaud Caubel, Frederique Cheruy, Francis Codron, Anne Cozic, David Cugnet, Fabio D'Andrea, Paolo Davini, Casimir deLavergne, Sébastien Denvil, Julie Deshayes, Marion Devilliers, Agnes Ducharne, Jean‐Louis Dufresne, Eliott Dupont, Christian Éthé, Laurent Fairhead, Lola Falletti, Simona Flavoni, Marie‐Alice Foujols, Sébastien Gardoll, Guillaume Gastineau, Josefine Ghattas, Jean‐Yves Grandpeix, Bertrand Guenet, Lionel, E. Guez, Eric Guilyardi, Matthieu Guimberteau, Didier Hauglustaine, Frédéric Hourdin, Abderrahmane Idelkadi, Sylvie Joussaume, Masa Kageyama, Myriam Khodri, Gerhard Krinner, Nicolas Lebas, Guillaume Levavasseur, Claire Lévy, Laurent Li, François Lott, Thibaut Lurton, Sebastiaan Luyssaert, Gurvan Madec, Jean‐Baptiste Madeleine, Fabienne Maignan, Marion Marchand, Olivier Marti, Lidia Mellul, Yann Meurdesoif, Juliette Mignot, Ionela Musat, Catherine Ottlé, Philippe Peylin, Yann Planton, Jan Polcher, Catherine Rio, Nicolas Rochetin, Clément Rousset, Pierre Sepulchre, Adriana Sima, Didier Swingedouw, Rémi Thiéblemont, Abdoul Khadre Traore, Martin Vancoppenolle, Jessica Vial, Jérôme Vialard, Nicolas Viovy, and Nicolas Vuichard
- Subjects
IPSL‐CM6A‐LR ,climate model ,climate metrics ,CMIP6 ,climate sensitivity ,Physical geography ,GB3-5030 ,Oceanography ,GC1-1581 - Abstract
Abstract This study presents the global climate model IPSL‐CM6A‐LR developed at Institut Pierre‐Simon Laplace (IPSL) to study natural climate variability and climate response to natural and anthropogenic forcings as part of the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). This article describes the different model components, their coupling, and the simulated climate in comparison to previous model versions. We focus here on the representation of the physical climate along with the main characteristics of the global carbon cycle. The model's climatology, as assessed from a range of metrics (related in particular to radiation, temperature, precipitation, and wind), is strongly improved in comparison to previous model versions. Although they are reduced, a number of known biases and shortcomings (e.g., double Intertropical Convergence Zone [ITCZ], frequency of midlatitude wintertime blockings, and El Niño–Southern Oscillation [ENSO] dynamics) persist. The equilibrium climate sensitivity and transient climate response have both increased from the previous climate model IPSL‐CM5A‐LR used in CMIP5. A large ensemble of more than 30 members for the historical period (1850–2018) and a smaller ensemble for a range of emissions scenarios (until 2100 and 2300) are also presented and discussed.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. An emerging impact of Eurasian spring snow cover on summer rainfall in Eastern China
- Author
-
Taotao Zhang, Tao Wang, Yingying Feng, Xichen Li, and Gerhard Krinner
- Subjects
Eurasian snow cover ,Eastern China summer rainfall ,summer North Atlantic Oscillation ,emerging impact ,Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering ,TD1-1066 ,Environmental sciences ,GE1-350 ,Science ,Physics ,QC1-999 - Abstract
Eurasian spring snow cover is widely considered as an important predictor of Asian summer monsoon rainfall, but its possible role in the formation of the north–south dipole structure of rainfall anomalies (NSDR)—a major mode of the eastern China summer rainfall variability—remains elusive. Here, we show that, there is a close connection between the western Eurasian spring snow cover (WESS) and NSDR during our research period 1967–2018, with less WESS tends to be accompanied by a wetter south-drier north pattern over eastern China, and vice versa. However, this relationship was not significant before the late 1990s, but has since become significant. Further analyses demonstrate that the shift in the WESS–NSDR relationship could be attributed to the modulation of summer North Atlantic Oscillation (SNAO). After the late 1990s, the WESS-related anomalous atmospheric circulations during summer are largely reinforced by the constructive superposition of those with same signs induced by SNAO, which in turn would intensify the impact of WESS and hence lead to a strong WESS–NSDR connection. In contrast, the influences of WESS are counteracted by those with opposite signs associated with SNAO before the late 1990s and thereby result in a weak snow–rainfall relationship. Our findings, along with the decline in Eurasian spring snow cover, provide a potential explanation for the recent ‘South Flood–North Drought’ pattern observed over eastern China.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Snow-Covered Soil Temperature Retrieval in Canadian Arctic Permafrost Areas, Using a Land Surface Scheme Informed with Satellite Remote Sensing Data
- Author
-
Nicolas Marchand, Alain Royer, Gerhard Krinner, Alexandre Roy, Alexandre Langlois, and Céline Vargel
- Subjects
soil temperature ,permafrost ,passive microwave ,thermal infrared ,snow cover ,Land Surface Model ,Radiative Transfer Model ,Canadian arctic ,Science - Abstract
High-latitude areas are very sensitive to global warming, which has significant impacts on soil temperatures and associated processes governing permafrost evolution. This study aims to improve first-layer soil temperature retrievals during winter. This key surface state variable is strongly affected by snow’s geophysical properties and their associated uncertainties (e.g., thermal conductivity) in land surface climate models. We used infrared MODIS land-surface temperatures (LST) and Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for EOS (AMSR-E) brightness temperatures (Tb) at 10.7 and 18.7 GHz to constrain the Canadian Land Surface Scheme (CLASS), driven by meteorological reanalysis data and coupled with a simple radiative transfer model. The Tb polarization ratio (horizontal/vertical) at 10.7 GHz was selected to improve snowpack density, which is linked to the thermal conductivity representation in the model. Referencing meteorological station soil temperature measurements, we validated the approach at four different sites in the North American tundra over a period of up to 8 years. Results show that the proposed method improves simulations of the soil temperature under snow (Tg) by 64% when using remote sensing (RS) data to constrain the model, compared to model outputs without satellite data information. The root mean square error (RMSE) between measured and simulated Tg under the snow ranges from 1.8 to 3.5 K when using RS data. Improved temporal monitoring of the soil thermal state, along with changes in snow properties, will improve our understanding of the various processes governing soil biological, hydrological, and permafrost evolution.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Non-uniform seasonal warming regulates vegetation greening and atmospheric CO2 amplification over northern lands
- Author
-
Zhao Li, Jianyang Xia, Anders Ahlström, Annette Rinke, Charles Koven, Daniel J Hayes, Duoying Ji, Geli Zhang, Gerhard Krinner, Guangsheng Chen, Wanying Cheng, Jinwei Dong, Junyi Liang, John C Moore, Lifen Jiang, Liming Yan, Philippe Ciais, Shushi Peng, Ying-Ping Wang, Xiangming Xiao, Zheng Shi, A David McGuire, and Yiqi Luo
- Subjects
slowed down ,asymmetric response ,non-uniform seasonal warming ,atmospheric CO2 amplitude ,Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering ,TD1-1066 ,Environmental sciences ,GE1-350 ,Science ,Physics ,QC1-999 - Abstract
The enhanced vegetation growth by climate warming plays a pivotal role in amplifying the seasonal cycle of atmospheric CO _2 at northern lands (>50° N) since 1960s. However, the correlation between vegetation growth, temperature and seasonal amplitude of atmospheric CO _2 concentration have become elusive with the slowed increasing trend of vegetation growth and weakened temperature control on CO _2 uptake since late 1990s. Here, based on in situ atmospheric CO _2 concentration records from the Barrow observatory site, we found a slowdown in the increasing trend of the atmospheric CO _2 amplitude from 1990s to mid-2000s. This phenomenon was associated with the paused decrease in the minimum CO _2 concentration ([CO _2 ] _min ), which was significantly correlated with the slowdown of vegetation greening and growing-season length extension. We then showed that both the vegetation greenness and growing-season length were positively correlated with spring but not autumn temperature over the northern lands. Furthermore, such asymmetric dependences of vegetation growth upon spring and autumn temperature cannot be captured by the state-of-art terrestrial biosphere models. These findings indicate that the responses of vegetation growth to spring and autumn warming are asymmetric, and highlight the need of improving autumn phenology in the models for predicting seasonal cycle of atmospheric CO _2 concentration.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Impacts of Satellite-Based Snow Albedo Assimilation on Offline and Coupled Land Surface Model Simulations.
- Author
-
Tao Wang, Shushi Peng, Gerhard Krinner, James Ryder, Yue Li, Sarah Dantec-Nédélec, and Catherine Ottlé
- Subjects
Medicine ,Science - Abstract
Seasonal snow cover in the Northern Hemisphere is the largest component of the terrestrial cryosphere and plays a major role in the climate system through strong positive feedbacks related to albedo. The snow-albedo feedback is invoked as an important cause for the polar amplification of ongoing and projected climate change, and its parameterization across models is an important source of uncertainty in climate simulations. Here, instead of developing a physical snow albedo scheme, we use a direct insertion approach to assimilate satellite-based surface albedo during the snow season (hereafter as snow albedo assimilation) into the land surface model ORCHIDEE (ORganizing Carbon and Hydrology In Dynamic EcosystEms) and assess the influences of such assimilation on offline and coupled simulations. Our results have shown that snow albedo assimilation in both ORCHIDEE and ORCHIDEE-LMDZ (a general circulation model of Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique) improve the simulation accuracy of mean seasonal (October throughout May) snow water equivalent over the region north of 40 degrees. The sensitivity of snow water equivalent to snow albedo assimilation is more pronounced in the coupled simulation than the offline simulation since the feedback of albedo on air temperature is allowed in ORCHIDEE-LMDZ. We have also shown that simulations of air temperature at 2 meters in ORCHIDEE-LMDZ due to snow albedo assimilation are significantly improved during the spring in particular over the eastern Siberia region. This is a result of the fact that high amounts of shortwave radiation during the spring can maximize its snow albedo feedback, which is also supported by the finding that the spatial sensitivity of temperature change to albedo change is much larger during the spring than during the autumn and winter. In addition, the radiative forcing at the top of the atmosphere induced by snow albedo assimilation during the spring is estimated to be -2.50 W m-2, the magnitude of which is almost comparable to that due to CO2 (2.83 W m-2) increases since 1750. Our results thus highlight the necessity of realistic representation of snow albedo in the model and demonstrate the use of satellite-based snow albedo to improve model behaviors, which opens new avenues for constraining snow albedo feedback in earth system models.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. CLIMATE CHANGE 2023 Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers
- Author
-
Hoesung Lee, Katherine Calvin, Dipak Dasgupta, Gerhard Krinner, Aditi Mukherji, Peter Thorne, Christopher Trisos, José Romero, Paulina Aldunce, and Alexander C Ruane
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
This Synthesis Report (SYR) of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) summarises the state of knowledge of climate change, its widespread impacts and risks, and climate change mitigation and adaptation. It integrates the main findings of the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) based on contributions from the three Working Groups, and the three Special Reports. The summary for Policymakers (SPM) is structured in three parts: SPM.A Current Status and Trends, SPM.B Future Climate Change, Risks, and Long-Term Responses, and SPM.C Responses in the Near Term. This report recognizes the interdependence of climate, ecosystems and biodiversity, and human societies; the value of diverse forms of knowledge; and the close linkages between climate change adaptation, mitigation, ecosystem health, human well-being and sustainable development, and reflects the increasing diversity of actors involved in climate action. Based on scientific understanding, key findings can be formulated as statements of fact or associated with an assessed level of confidence using the IPCC calibrated languages.
- Published
- 2024
15. Mass balance of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets from 1992 to 2020
- Author
-
Inès N. Otosaka, Andrew Shepherd, Erik R. Ivins, Nicole-Jeanne Schlegel, Charles Amory, Michiel R. van den Broeke, Martin Horwath, Ian Joughin, Michalea D. King, Gerhard Krinner, Sophie Nowicki, Anthony J. Payne, Eric Rignot, Ted Scambos, Karen M. Simon, Benjamin E. Smith, Louise S. Sørensen, Isabella Velicogna, Pippa L. Whitehouse, Geruo A, Cécile Agosta, Andreas P. Ahlstrøm, Alejandro Blazquez, William Colgan, Marcus E. Engdahl, Xavier Fettweis, Rene Forsberg, Hubert Gallée, Alex Gardner, Lin Gilbert, Noel Gourmelen, Andreas Groh, Brian C. Gunter, Christopher Harig, Veit Helm, Shfaqat Abbas Khan, Christoph Kittel, Hannes Konrad, Peter L. Langen, Benoit S. Lecavalier, Chia-Chun Liang, Bryant D. Loomis, Malcolm McMillan, Daniele Melini, Sebastian H. Mernild, Ruth Mottram, Jeremie Mouginot, Johan Nilsson, Brice Noël, Mark E. Pattle, William R. Peltier, Nadege Pie, Mònica Roca, Ingo Sasgen, Himanshu V. Save, Ki-Weon Seo, Bernd Scheuchl, Ernst J. O. Schrama, Ludwig Schröder, Sebastian B. Simonsen, Thomas Slater, Giorgio Spada, Tyler C. Sutterley, Bramha Dutt Vishwakarma, Jan Melchior van Wessem, David Wiese, Wouter van der Wal, Bert Wouters, Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] (LSCE), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire d'études en Géophysique et océanographie spatiales (LEGOS), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement (IGE), and Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP )
- Subjects
remote sensing ,[SDU]Sciences of the Universe [physics] ,Greenland ,Antarctica ,General Earth and Planetary Sciences ,sea level ,ice sheet - Abstract
International audience; Ice losses from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets have accelerated since the 1990s, accounting for a significant increase in the global mean sea level. Here, we present a new 29-year record of ice sheet mass balance from 1992 to 2020 from the Ice Sheet Mass Balance Inter-comparison Exercise (IMBIE). We compare and combine 50 independent estimates of ice sheet mass balance derived from satellite observations of temporal changes in ice sheet flow, in ice sheet volume, and in Earth's gravity field. Between 1992 and 2020, the ice sheets contributed 21.0±1.9 mm to global mean sea level, with the rate of mass loss rising from 105 Gt yr−1 between 1992 and 1996 to 372 Gt yr−1 between 2016 and 2020. In Greenland, the rate of mass loss is 169±9 Gt yr−1 between 1992 and 2020, but there are large inter-annual variations in mass balance, with mass loss ranging from 86 Gt yr−1 in 2017 to 444 Gt yr−1 in 2019 due to large variability in surface mass balance. In Antarctica, ice losses continue to be dominated by mass loss from West Antarctica (82±9 Gt yr−1) and, to a lesser extent, from the Antarctic Peninsula (13±5 Gt yr−1). East Antarctica remains close to a state of balance, with a small gain of 3±15 Gt yr−1, but is the most uncertain component of Antarctica's mass balance. The dataset is publicly available at https://doi.org/10.5285/77B64C55-7166-4A06-9DEF-2E400398E452 (IMBIE Team, 2021).
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Continental heat storage: contributions from the ground, inland waters, and permafrost thawing
- Author
-
Francisco José Cuesta-Valero, Hugo Beltrami, Almudena García-García, Gerhard Krinner, Moritz Langer, Andrew H. MacDougall, Jan Nitzbon, Jian Peng, Karina von Schuckmann, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Wim Thiery, Inne Vanderkelen, Tonghua Wu, Earth and Climate, Faculty of Engineering, and Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering
- Subjects
General Earth and Planetary Sciences ,SDG 14 - Life Below Water - Abstract
Heat storage within the Earth system is a fundamental metric for understanding climate change. The current energy imbalance at the top of the atmosphere causes changes in energy storage within the ocean, the atmosphere, the cryosphere, and the continental landmasses. After the ocean, heat storage in land is the second largest term of the Earth heat inventory, affecting physical processes relevant to society and ecosystems, such as the stability of the soil carbon pool. Here, we present an update of the continental heat storage, combining for the first time the heat in the land subsurface, inland water bodies, and permafrost thawing. The continental landmasses stored 23.8 ± 2.0 × 10(21) J during the period 1960–2020, but the distribution of heat among the three components is not homogeneous. The sensible diffusion of heat through the ground accounts for ∼90 % of the continental heat storage, with inland water bodies and permafrost degradation (i.e. latent heat) accounting for ∼0.7 % and ∼9 % of the continental heat, respectively. Although the inland water bodies and permafrost soils store less heat than the solid ground, we argue that their associated climate phenomena justify their monitoring and inclusion in the Earth heat inventory., Earth System Dynamics, 14 (3), ISSN:2190-4987, ISSN:2190-4979
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Heat stored in the Earth system 1960-2020:where does the energy go?
- Author
-
Karina von Schuckmann, Audrey Minière, Flora Gues, Francisco José Cuesta-Valero, Gottfried Kirchengast, Susheel Adusumilli, Fiammetta Straneo, Michaël Ablain, Richard P. Allan, Paul M. Barker, Hugo Beltrami, Alejandro Blazquez, Tim Boyer, Lijing Cheng, John Church, Damien Desbruyeres, Han Dolman, Catia M. Domingues, Almudena García-García, Donata Giglio, John E. Gilson, Maximilian Gorfer, Leopold Haimberger, Maria Z. Hakuba, Stefan Hendricks, Shigeki Hosoda, Gregory C. Johnson, Rachel Killick, Brian King, Nicolas Kolodziejczyk, Anton Korosov, Gerhard Krinner, Mikael Kuusela, Felix W. Landerer, Moritz Langer, Thomas Lavergne, Isobel Lawrence, Yuehua Li, John Lyman, Florence Marti, Ben Marzeion, Michael Mayer, Andrew H. MacDougall, Trevor McDougall, Didier Paolo Monselesan, Jan Nitzbon, Inès Otosaka, Jian Peng, Sarah Purkey, Dean Roemmich, Kanako Sato, Katsunari Sato, Abhishek Savita, Axel Schweiger, Andrew Shepherd, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Leon Simons, Donald A. Slater, Thomas Slater, Andrea K. Steiner, Toshio Suga, Tanguy Szekely, Wim Thiery, Mary-Louise Timmermans, Inne Vanderkelen, Susan E. Wjiffels, Tonghua Wu, Michael Zemp, Earth and Climate, and Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering
- Subjects
General Earth and Planetary Sciences - Abstract
The Earth climate system is out of energy balance, and heat has accumulated continuously over the past decades, warming the ocean, the land, the cryosphere, and the atmosphere. According to the Sixth Assessment Report by Working Group I of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, this planetary warming over multiple decades is human-driven and results in unprecedented and committed changes to the Earth system, with adverse impacts for ecosystems and human systems. The Earth heat inventory provides a measure of the Earth energy imbalance (EEI) and allows for quantifying how much heat has accumulated in the Earth system, as well as where the heat is stored. Here we show that the Earth system has continued to accumulate heat, with 381±61 ZJ accumulated from 1971 to 2020. This is equivalent to a heating rate (i.e., the EEI) of 0.48±0.1 W m−2. The majority, about 89 %, of this heat is stored in the ocean, followed by about 6 % on land, 1 % in the atmosphere, and about 4 % available for melting the cryosphere. Over the most recent period (2006–2020), the EEI amounts to 0.76±0.2 W m−2. The Earth energy imbalance is the most fundamental global climate indicator that the scientific community and the public can use as the measure of how well the world is doing in the task of bringing anthropogenic climate change under control. Moreover, this indicator is highly complementary to other established ones like global mean surface temperature as it represents a robust measure of the rate of climate change and its future commitment. We call for an implementation of the Earth energy imbalance into the Paris Agreement's Global Stocktake based on best available science. The Earth heat inventory in this study, updated from von Schuckmann et al. (2020), is underpinned by worldwide multidisciplinary collaboration and demonstrates the critical importance of concerted international efforts for climate change monitoring and community-based recommendations and we also call for urgently needed actions for enabling continuity, archiving, rescuing, and calibrating efforts to assure improved and long-term monitoring capacity of the global climate observing system. The data for the Earth heat inventory are publicly available, and more details are provided in Table 4.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Mass Balance of the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets from 1992 to 2020
- Author
-
Inès N. Otosaka, Andrew Shepherd, Erik R. Ivins, Nicole-Jeanne Schlegel, Charles Amory, Michiel van den Broeke, Martin Horwath, Ian Joughin, Michalea King, Gerhard Krinner, Sophie Nowicki, Tony Payne, Eric Rignot, Ted Scambos, Karen M. Simon, Benjamin Smith, Louise Sandberg Sørensen, Isabella Velicogna, Pippa Whitehouse, Geruo A, Cécile Agosta, Andreas P. Ahlstrøm, Alejandro Blazquez, William Colgan, Marcus Engdahl, Xavier Fettweis, Rene Forsberg, Hubert Gallée, Alex Gardner, Lin Gilbert, Noel Gourmelen, Andreas Groh, Brian C. Gunter, Christopher Harig, Veit Helm, Shfaqat Abbas Khan, Hannes Konrad, Peter Langen, Benoit Lecavalier, Chia-Chun Liang, Bryant Loomis, Malcolm McMillan, Daniele Melini, Sebastian H. Mernild, Ruth Mottram, Jeremie Mouginot, Johan Nilsson, Brice Noël, Mark E. Pattle, William R. Peltier, Nadege Pie, Ingo Sasgen, Himanshu Save, Ki-Weon Seo, Bernd Scheuchl, Ernst Schrama, Ludwig Schröder, Sebastian B. Simonsen, Thomas Slater, Giorgio Spada, Tyler Sutterley, Bramha Dutt Vishwakarma, Jan Melchior van Wessem, David Wiese, Wouter van der Wal, and Bert Wouters
- Abstract
Ice losses from the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets have accelerated since the 1990s, accounting for a significant increase in global mean sea level. Here, we present a new 29-year record of ice sheet mass balance from 1992 to 2020 from the Ice Sheet Mass Balance Inter-comparison Exercise (IMBIE). We compare and combine 50 independent estimates of ice sheet mass balance derived from satellite observations of temporal changes in ice sheet flow, in ice sheet volume and in Earth’s gravity field. Between 1992 and 2020, the ice sheets contributed 21.0 ± 1.9 mm to global mean sea-level, with the rate of mass loss rising from 105 Gt yr-1 between 1992 and 1996 to 372 Gt yr-1 between 2016 and 2020. In Greenland, the rate of mass loss is 169 ± 9 Gt yr-1 between 1992 and 2020 but there are large inter-annual variations in mass balance with mass loss ranging from 86 Gt yr-1 in 2017 to 444 Gt yr-1 in 2019 due to large variability in surface mass balance. In Antarctica, ice losses continue to be dominated by mass loss from West Antarctica (-82 ± 9 Gt yr-1) and to a lesser extent from the Antarctic Peninsula (-13 ± 5 Gt yr-1). East Antarctica remains close to a state of balance (3 ± 15 Gt yr-1), but is the most uncertain component of Antarctica’s mass balance.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Supplementary material to 'Continental heat storage: Contributions from ground, inland waters, and permafrost thawing'
- Author
-
Francisco José Cuesta-Valero, Hugo Beltrami, Almudena García-García, Gerhard Krinner, Moritz Langer, Andrew H. MacDougall, Jan Nitzbon, Jian Peng, Karina von Schuckmann, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Noah Smith, Wim Thiery, Inne Vanderkelen, and Tonghua Wu
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Continental heat storage: Contributions from ground, inland waters, and permafrost thawing
- Author
-
Francisco José Cuesta-Valero, Hugo Beltrami, Almudena García-García, Gerhard Krinner, Moritz Langer, Andrew H. MacDougall, Jan Nitzbon, Jian Peng, Karina von Schuckmann, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Noah Smith, Wim Thiery, Inne Vanderkelen, and Tonghua Wu
- Abstract
Heat storage within the Earth system is a fundamental metric to understand climate change. The current energy imbalance at the top of the atmosphere causes changes in energy storage within the ocean, the atmosphere, the cryosphere, and the continental landmasses. After the ocean, heat storage in land is the second largest term of the Earth heat inventory, affecting physical processes relevant to society and ecosystems, such as the stability of the soil carbon pool. Here, we present an update of the continental heat storage combining for the first time the heat in the land subsurface, inland water bodies, and permafrost thawing. The continental landmasses stored 23.9±0.4×1021 J during the period 1960–2020, but the distribution of heat among the three components is not homogeneous. The ground stores ~90 % of the continental heat storage, with inland water bodies and permafrost degradation accounting for ~0.7 % and ~9 % of the continental heat, respectively. Although the inland water bodies and permafrost soils store less heat than the ground, we argue that their associated climate phenomena justify their monitoring and inclusion in the Earth heat inventory.
- Published
- 2022
21. Heat stored in the Earth system 1960–2020: Where does the energy go?
- Author
-
Karina von Schuckmann, Audrey Minère, Flora Gues, Francisco José Cuesta-Valero, Gottfried Kirchengast, Susheel Adusumilli, Fiammetta Straneo, Richard Allan, Paul M. Barker, Hugo Beltrami, Tim Boyer, Lijing Cheng, John Church, Damien Desbruyeres, Han Dolman, Catia M. Domingues, Almudena García-García, Donata Giglio, John E. Gilson, Maximilian Gorfer, Leopold Haimberger, Stefan Hendricks, Shigeki Hosoda, Gregory C. Johnson, Rachel Killick, Brian King, Nikolas Kolodziejczyk, Anton Korosov, Gerhard Krinner, Mikael Kuusela, Moritz Langer, Thomas Lavergne, Isobel Lawrence, Yuehua Li, John Lyman, Ben Marzeion, Michael Mayer, Andrew H. MacDougall, Trevor McDougall, Didier Paolo Monselesan, Jan Nitzbon, Inès Otosaka, Jian Peng, Sarah Purkey, Dean Roemmich, Kanako Sato, Katsunari Sato, Abhishek Savita, Axel Schweiger, Andrew Shepherd, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Leon Simons, Donald A. Slater, Thomas Slater, Noah Smith, Andrea Steiner, Toshio Suga, Tanguy Szekely, Wim Thiery, Mary-Louise Timmermans, Inne Vanderkelen, Susan E. Wjiffels, Tonghua Wu, and Michael Zemp
- Abstract
The Earth climate system is out of energy balance and heat has accumulated continuously over the past decades, warming the ocean, the land, the cryosphere and the atmosphere. According to the 6th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, this planetary warming over multiple decades is human-driven and results in unprecedented and committed changes to the Earth system, with adverse impacts for ecosystems and human systems. The Earth heat inventory provides a measure of the Earth energy imbalance, and allows for quantifying how much heat has accumulated in the Earth system, and where the heat is stored. Here we show that 380 ± 62 ZJ of heat has accumulated in the Earth system from 1971 to 2020, at a rate of 0.48 ± 0.1 W m−2, with 89 ± 17 % of this heat stored in the ocean, 6 ± 0.1 % on land, 4 ± 1 % in the cryosphere and 1 ± 0.2 % in the atmosphere. Over the most recent decade (2006–2020), the Earth heat inventory shows increased warming at rate of 0.48 ± 0.3 W m−2/decade, and the Earth climate system is out of energy balance by 0.76 ± 0.2 Wm−2. The Earth heat inventory is the most fundamental global climate indicator that the scientific community and the public can use as the measure of how well the world is doing in the task of bringing anthropogenic climate change under control. We call for an implementation of the Earth heat inventory into the Paris agreement’s global stocktake based on best available science. The Earth heat inventory in this study, updated from von Schuckmann et al, 2020, is underpinned by worldwide multidisciplinary collaboration and demonstrates the critical importance of concerted international efforts for climate change monitoring and community-based recommendations as coordinated by the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS). We also call for urgently needed actions for enabling continuity, archiving, rescuing and calibrating efforts to assure improved and long-term monitoring capacity of the relevant GCOS Essential Climate Variables (ECV) for the Earth heat inventory.
- Published
- 2022
22. Communicating projection uncertainty and ambiguity in sea-level assessment
- Author
-
Robert Kopp, Michael Oppenheimer, Jessica L O'Reilly, Sybren S Drijfhout, Tamsin L Edwards, Baylor Fox-Kemper, Gregory G Garner, Nicholas R Golledge, Tim H J Hermans, Helene T Hewitt, Benjamin P Horton, Gerhard Krinner, Dirk Notz, Sophie Nowicki, Matthew D Palmer, Aimée B A Slangen, and Cunde Xiao
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Scientific and Human Errors in a Snow Model Intercomparison
- Author
-
Matthieu Lafaysse, Richard Essery, Paul Bartlett, Vladimir Semenov, Ulrich Strasser, Aaron Boone, Xing Fang, Gabriele Arduini, Cécile B. Ménard, Yongjiu Dai, Claire Brutel-Vuilmet, Gerd Schädler, Thomas Marke, Eleanor J. Burke, Tatiana G. Smirnova, Dmitry Turkov, Emanuel Dutra, Stefan Hagemann, Vanessa Haverd, Sean Swenson, Hua Yuan, Charles Fierz, Hyungjun Kim, Yeugeniy M. Gusev, Masashi Niwano, Gerhard Krinner, Matthias Cuntz, Olga N. Nasonova, Tomoko Nitta, Bertrand Decharme, John W. Pomeroy, Nander Wever, Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement (IGE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP ), Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Centre national de recherches météorologiques (CNRM), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Météo France-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), SILVA (SILVA), AgroParisTech-Université de Lorraine (UL)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), and Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
- Subjects
Atmospheric Science ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,0207 environmental engineering ,02 engineering and technology ,[SDU.STU.ME]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Meteorology ,Snowpack ,Snow ,01 natural sciences ,[SDU.STU.CL]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Climatology ,13. Climate action ,Climatology ,Environmental science ,[SDU.STU.HY]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Hydrology ,020701 environmental engineering ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
Twenty-seven models participated in the Earth System Model–Snow Model Intercomparison Project (ESM-SnowMIP), the most data-rich MIP dedicated to snow modeling. Our findings do not support the hypothesis advanced by previous snow MIPs: evaluating models against more variables and providing evaluation datasets extended temporally and spatially does not facilitate identification of key new processes requiring improvement to model snow mass and energy budgets, even at point scales. In fact, the same modeling issues identified by previous snow MIPs arose: albedo is a major source of uncertainty, surface exchange parameterizations are problematic, and individual model performance is inconsistent. This lack of progress is attributed partly to the large number of human errors that led to anomalous model behavior and to numerous resubmissions. It is unclear how widespread such errors are in our field and others; dedicated time and resources will be needed to tackle this issue to prevent highly sophisticated models and their research outputs from being vulnerable because of avoidable human mistakes. The design of and the data available to successive snow MIPs were also questioned. Evaluation of models against bulk snow properties was found to be sufficient for some but inappropriate for more complex snow models whose skills at simulating internal snow properties remained untested. Discussions between the authors of this paper on the purpose of MIPs revealed varied, and sometimes contradictory, motivations behind their participation. These findings started a collaborative effort to adapt future snow MIPs to respond to the diverse needs of the community.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Les rivières atmosphériques de l'Antarctique
- Author
-
Vincent Favier, Jonathan Wille, Cécile Agosta, Charles Amory, Léonard Barthélémy, Francis Codron, Élise Fourré, Irina Gorodetskaya, Gerhard Krinner, Benjamin Pohl, Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement (IGE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP ), Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] (LSCE), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratory of Climatology, Université de Liège, Océan et variabilité du climat (VARCLIM), Laboratoire d'Océanographie et du Climat : Expérimentations et Approches Numériques (LOCEAN), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut Pierre-Simon-Laplace (IPSL (FR_636)), École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-École polytechnique (X)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-École polytechnique (X)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)-Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut Pierre-Simon-Laplace (IPSL (FR_636)), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-École polytechnique (X)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité), Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies [Aveiro] (CESAM), Universidade de Aveiro, Biogéosciences [UMR 6282] (BGS), Université de Bourgogne (UB)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), and ANR-20-CE01-0013,ARCA,Climatologie des rivières atmosphériques en Antarctique(2020)
- Subjects
[SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere - Abstract
Sur une grande partie de l'Antarctique, le bilan de masse (c'est-à-dire de neige) de surface est dominé par quelques événements de précipitations extrêmes. Ces événements dépendent d'intrusions de masses d'air très humide associées à des phénomènes dénommés rivières atmosphériques en provenance de l'océan Austral. Ces rivières atmosphériques influencent fortement le climat ; pourtant, les caractéristiques, les mécanismes et les impacts associés restent mal connus en Antarctique. Nous résumons ici l'état des connaissances sur la mise en place de ces événements extrêmes et leurs impacts à la fois sur l'accumulation de neige, le réchauffement et la fonte en surface de la calotte. Over much of Antarctica, the surface mass balance (i.e. the resultant of snow fluxes at the surface of the ice sheet) is dominated by a few extreme precipitation events. It has recently been shown that these events are linked to intrusions of highly humid air masses related with atmospheric rivers traversing the Southern Ocean. These atmospheric rivers strongly influence the climate, yet their meteorological characterization and associated impacts remain poorly understood in Antarctica. We summarize here the latest research regarding the development of these extreme events and their impacts on snow accumulation, warming, and surface melt on the Antarctic ice sheet.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Publication du 6e rapport de synthèse du Giec
- Author
-
Gerhard Krinner, Céline Guivarch, Jean-Charles Hourcade, Valérie Masson-Delmotte, Sophie Szopa, and Yamina Saheb
- Subjects
General Medicine - Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Relationship between weather regimes and atmospheric rivers in East Antarctica
- Author
-
Jonathan Wille, Danielle G. Udy, Julien Pergaud, Tessa Vance, Gerhard Krinner, Niels Dutrievoz, Juliette Blanchet, Charles Amory, Francis Codron, Benjamin Pohl, Vincent Favier, Christoph Kittel, Biogéosciences [UMR 6282] (BGS), Université de Bourgogne (UB)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement (IGE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP ), Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies [Hobart] (IMAS), University of Tasmania [Hobart, Australia] (UTAS), ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes, Laboratory of Climatology, Université de Liège, Océan et variabilité du climat (VARCLIM), Laboratoire d'Océanographie et du Climat : Expérimentations et Approches Numériques (LOCEAN), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut Pierre-Simon-Laplace (IPSL (FR_636)), École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-École polytechnique (X)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-École polytechnique (X)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)-Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut Pierre-Simon-Laplace (IPSL (FR_636)), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-École polytechnique (X)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité), ANR-20-CE01-0013,ARCA,Climatologie des rivières atmosphériques en Antarctique(2020), Biogéosciences [UMR 6282] [Dijon] (BGS), Université de Bourgogne (UB)-AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies [Horbat] (IMAS), Institut Pierre-Simon-Laplace (IPSL (FR_636)), École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-École polytechnique (X)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-École polytechnique (X)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Institut Pierre-Simon-Laplace (IPSL (FR_636)), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-École polytechnique (X)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU), and Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP )
- Subjects
Atmospheric Science ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,East antarctica ,15. Life on land ,010502 geochemistry & geophysics ,01 natural sciences ,Geophysics ,Oceanography ,13. Climate action ,Space and Planetary Science ,[SDU.STU.CL]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Climatology ,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) ,Geology ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
25 pages; International audience; Here, we define weather regimes in the East Antarctica—Southern Ocean sector based on daily anomalies of 700 hPa geopotential height derived from ERA5 reanalysis during 1979–2018. Most regimes and their preferred transitions depict synoptic-scale disturbances propagating eastwards off the Antarctic coastline. While regime sequences are generally short, their interannual variability is strongly driven by the polarity of the Southern Annular Mode (SAM). Regime occurrences are then intersected with atmospheric rivers (ARs) detected over the same region and period. ARs are equiprobable throughout the year, but clearly concentrate during regimes associated with a strong atmospheric ridges/blockings on the eastern part of the domain, which act to channel meridional advection of heat and moisture from the lower latitudes towards Antarctica. Both regimes and ARs significantly shape climate variability in Antarctica. Regimes favorable to AR occurrences are associated with anomalously warm and humid conditions in coastal Antarctica and, to a lesser extent, the hinterland parts of the Antarctic plateau. These anomalies are strongly enhanced during AR events, with warmer anomalies and dramatically amplified snowfall amounts. Large-scale conditions favoring AR development are finally explored. They show weak dependency to the SAM, but particularly strong atmospheric ridges/blockings over the Southern Ocean appear as the most favorable pattern, in which ARs can be embedded, and to which they contribute.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Climate change in the High Mountain Asia in CMIP6
- Author
-
Martin Ménégoz, Gerhard Krinner, Mickaël Lalande, Kathrin Naegeli, Stefan Wunderle, Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement (IGE), Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP ), Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research (OCCR), University of Bern, and Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP )
- Subjects
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Science ,0207 environmental engineering ,Climate change ,QE500-639.5 ,02 engineering and technology ,Atmospheric sciences ,01 natural sciences ,High mountain ,Precipitation ,910 Geography & travel ,020701 environmental engineering ,550 Earth sciences & geology ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Coupled model intercomparison project ,geography ,QE1-996.5 ,Plateau ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,Elevation ,Northern Hemisphere ,Cru ,Geology ,Dynamic and structural geology ,13. Climate action ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,General Earth and Planetary Sciences ,Environmental science - Abstract
Climate change over High Mountain Asia (HMA, including the Tibetan Plateau) is investigated over the period 1979–2014 and in future projections following the four Shared Socioeconomic Pathways: SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5. The skill of 26 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6) models is estimated for near-surface air temperature, snow cover extent and total precipitation, and 10 of them are used to describe their projections until 2100. Similarly to previous CMIP models, this new generation of general circulation models (GCMs) shows a mean cold bias over this area reaching −1.9 [−8.2 to 2.9] ∘C (90 % confidence interval) in comparison with the Climate Research Unit (CRU) observational dataset, associated with a snow cover mean overestimation of 12 % [−13 % to 43 %], corresponding to a relative bias of 52 % [−53 % to 183 %] in comparison with the NOAA Climate Data Record (CDR) satellite dataset. The temperature and snow cover model biases are more pronounced in winter. Simulated precipitation rates are overestimated by 1.5 [0.3 to 2.9] mm d−1, corresponding to a relative bias of 143 % [31 % to 281 %], but this might be an apparent bias caused by the undercatch of solid precipitation in the APHRODITE (Asian Precipitation-Highly-Resolved Observational Data Integration Towards Evaluation of Water Resources) observational reference. For most models, the cold surface bias is associated with an overestimation of snow cover extent, but this relationship does not hold for all models, suggesting that the processes of the origin of the biases can differ from one model to another. A significant correlation between snow cover bias and surface elevation is found, and to a lesser extent between temperature bias and surface elevation, highlighting the model weaknesses at high elevation. The models with the best performance for temperature are not necessarily the most skillful for the other variables, and there is no clear relationship between model resolution and model skill. This highlights the need for a better understanding of the physical processes driving the climate in this complex topographic area, as well as for further parameterization developments adapted to such areas. A dependency of the simulated past trends on the model biases is found for some variables and seasons; however, some highly biased models fall within the range of observed trends, suggesting that model bias is not a robust criterion to discard models in trend analysis. The HMA median warming simulated over 2081–2100 with respect to 1995–2014 ranges from 1.9 [1.2 to 2.7] ∘C for SSP1-2.6 to 6.5 [4.9 to 9.0] ∘C for SSP5-8.5. This general warming is associated with a relative median snow cover extent decrease from −9.4 % [−16.4 % to −5.0 %] to −32.2 % [−49.1 % to −25.0 %] and a relative median precipitation increase from 8.5 % [4.8 % to 18.2 %] to 24.9 % [14.4 % to 48.1 %] by the end of the century in these respective scenarios. The warming is 11 % higher over HMA than over the other Northern Hemisphere continental surfaces, excluding the Arctic area. Seasonal temperature, snow cover and precipitation changes over HMA show a linear relationship with the global surface air temperature (GSAT), except for summer snow cover which shows a slower decrease at strong levels of GSAT.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Factors Influencing Snow Model Performance in Boreal Forests - Results from the ESM-SnowMIP Forest Site Simulations
- Author
-
Cécile B. Ménard, P. Bartlett, Libo Wang, Chris Derksen, Richard Essery, and Gerhard Krinner
- Subjects
Taiga ,Environmental science ,Physical geography ,Snow - Abstract
The site level component of the Earth System Model – Snow Model Intercomparison Project has 28 participating model variants. We summarize model performance at the Boreal Ecosystem Research and Monitoring Sites (BERMS) Old Aspen (OAS), Old Black Spruce (OBS) and Old Jack Pine (OJP) forests in Saskatchewan.Many CMIP5 models have been previously shown to overestimate the winter albedo in the boreal forest due to errors in plant functional type (PFT) and leaf area index (LAI). In this project provided values for PFT and LAI were not implemented in a few models, but many models show a positive albedo bias in excess of 0.1 and some show a much larger positive bias. A larger positive albedo bias at OAS by some models suggests that snow masking by leafless trees requires attention. Average albedo bias from these off-line simulations, which lack atmospheric feedbacks, is not strongly related to bias in snowpack properties or the treatment or lack thereof of intercepted snow.About half the models simulated snow water equivalent (SWE) with a RMSE smaller than the standard deviation of the observations. Snow depth was simulated slightly worse and only three models met this standard with respect to snowpack density. SWE was underestimated by just over half the models but the density of these sheltered snowpacks was overestimated by most models, resulting in snowpack depth being underestimated by an average 0.1 m. Models with multiple simplified surface parameterizations tend to show the greatest underestimation of SWE and depth and overestimation of density.Biases in above-canopy radiative, snow surface and bulk snowpack temperatures are not consistent with respect to size and sign; many models show a combination of positive and negative biases. Radiative and snowpack surface temperatures are associated with trends in turbulent heat fluxes. Models with multiple simplified surface parameterizations (e.g. large or fixed density or thermal conductivity values, a composite snowpack, no organic soil) show more negative soil temperature biases and appear to be associated with a colder snowpack, but unfortunately, bulk snowpack temperature was not reported for many such models. Negative SWE and depth biases are associated with colder winter soil temperatures and shorter snow seasons. Most models simulate snow thermal conductivity with one of many relationships with density. Soil temperature bias is highly sensitive to the choice of snow thermal conductivity parameterization.Models with many snow layers tend to show smaller errors in snowpack properties and are less likely to show cold biases in the snowpack and soil compared with composite or single layer models. However, as found in previous SnowMIPs, some single-layer models occupy the same bias range as multi-layer models. Models employing a multi-layer snowpack tend not to employ multiple “simplified parameterizations” as described above whereas the models with a single snow layer employ surface parameterizations with a range of sophistication.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. An emerging impact of Eurasian spring snow cover on summer rainfall in Eastern China
- Author
-
Tao Wang, Xichen Li, Yingying Feng, Gerhard Krinner, Taotao Zhang, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences [Beijing] (CAS), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences [Beijing] (UCAS), Institute of Atmospheric Physics [Beijing] (IAP), Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement (IGE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP ), and Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)
- Subjects
geography ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment ,Eurasian snow cover ,emerging impact ,Eastern china ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Eastern China summer rainfall ,[SDU.STU.CL]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Climatology ,Spring (hydrology) ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,Environmental science ,Physical geography ,summer North Atlantic Oscillation ,Snow cover ,General Environmental Science - Abstract
Eurasian spring snow cover is widely considered as an important predictor of Asian summer monsoon rainfall, but its possible role in the formation of the north–south dipole structure of rainfall anomalies (NSDR)—a major mode of the eastern China summer rainfall variability—remains elusive. Here, we show that, there is a close connection between the western Eurasian spring snow cover (WESS) and NSDR during our research period 1967–2018, with less WESS tends to be accompanied by a wetter south-drier north pattern over eastern China, and vice versa. However, this relationship was not significant before the late 1990s, but has since become significant. Further analyses demonstrate that the shift in the WESS–NSDR relationship could be attributed to the modulation of summer North Atlantic Oscillation (SNAO). After the late 1990s, the WESS-related anomalous atmospheric circulations during summer are largely reinforced by the constructive superposition of those with same signs induced by SNAO, which in turn would intensify the impact of WESS and hence lead to a strong WESS–NSDR connection. In contrast, the influences of WESS are counteracted by those with opposite signs associated with SNAO before the late 1990s and thereby result in a weak snow–rainfall relationship. Our findings, along with the decline in Eurasian spring snow cover, provide a potential explanation for the recent ‘South Flood–North Drought’ pattern observed over eastern China.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Significant additional Antarctic warming in atmospheric bias-corrected ARPEGE projections
- Author
-
Gerhard Krinner, Cécile Agosta, Michel Déqué, Julien Beaumet, Antoinette Alias, and Vincent Favier
- Subjects
geography ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,Atmospheric circulation ,Climatology ,Environmental science ,Antarctic ice sheet ,Westerlies ,Precipitation ,Atmospheric model ,Ice sheet ,Southern Hemisphere ,Latitude - Abstract
In this study, we use run-time bias-correction to correct for ARPEGE atmospheric model systematic errors on large-scale atmospheric circulation. The bias correction terms are built using the climatological mean of the adjustment terms on tendency errors in an ARPEGE simulation relaxed towards ERA-Interim reanalyses. The improvements with respect to the AMIP-style uncorrected control run for the general atmospheric circulation in the Southern Hemisphere are significant for mean state and daily variability. Comparisons for the Antarctic Ice Sheet with the polar-oriented regional atmospheric models MAR and RACMO2 and in-situ observations also suggest substantial bias reduction for near-surface temperature and precipitation in coastal areas. Applying the method to climate projections for the late 21st century (2071–2100) leads to large differences in the projected changes of the atmospheric circulation in the Southern high latitudes and of the Antarctic surface climate. The projected poleward shift and strengthening of the southern westerly winds are greatly reduced. These changes result in a significant 0.7 to 0.9 K additional warming and a 6 to 9 % additional increase in precipitation over the grounded ice sheet. The sensitivity of precipitation increase to temperature (+7.7 and +9 %.K−1) found is also higher than previous estimates. Highest additional warming rates are found over East Antarctica in summer. In winter, there is a dipole of weaker warming and weaker precipitation increase over West Antarctica, contrasted by a stronger warming and a concomitant stronger precipitation increase from Victoria to Adélie Land, associated with a weaker intensification of the Amundsen Sea Low.
- Published
- 2020
31. A valuable contribution
- Author
-
Gerhard Krinner
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Evaluation of coastal Antarctic precipitation in MAR3.9 regional and LMDz6 global atmospheric model with ground-based radar observations
- Author
-
Hubert Gallée, Chantal Claud, Alizée Chemison, Jean-Baptiste Madeleine, Christophe Genthon, Florentin Lemonnier, and Gerhard Krinner
- Subjects
law ,General Circulation Model ,Environmental science ,Polar ,Excessive energy ,Climate change ,Atmospheric model ,Radar ,Dissipation ,Atmospheric sciences ,Polar climate ,law.invention - Abstract
In the current context of climate change in the poles, one of the objectives of the APRES3 (Antarctic Precipitation Remote Sensing from Surface and Space) project is to characterize the vertical structure of precipitation in order to better simulate it. Nowadays, the precipitation simulated by models in Antarctica is very widespread and overestimated the data. Sensitivity studies have been conducted using two models and compared to the observations obtained at the Dumont d'Urville coast station, obtained by a Micro Rain Radar (MRR). The MAR meso-scale model specifically developed for the polar regions and the LMDz/IPSL general circulation model, with zoomed configuration over Dumont d'Urville, have been considered for this study. These models being different in resolution and physical configuration, performing an inter-comparison required numerical, dynamic and physical adjustments in LMDz. A sensitivity study was conducted on the physical and numerical parameters of the LMDz model and on the resolution of the MAR with the aim of estimating their contribution to the precipitation simulation. Sensitivity tests with MAR revealed that this model is well adjusted for precipitation modeling in polar climates, this confirming that this model is a reference in polar climate modeling. Regarding LMDz, sensitivity experiments revealed that modifications in the sedimentation and sublimation parameters do not significantly impact precipitation rate. However, dissipation of the LMDz model, which is a numerical process that dissipates spatially excessive energy and keeps the model stable, impacts precipitation indirectly but very strongly. A suitable adjustment of the dissipation reduces significantly precipitation over Antarctic peripheral area, thus providing a simulated profile in better agreement with the MRR observations.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Brief communication: Evaluating Antarctic precipitation in ERA5 and CMIP6 against CloudSat observations
- Author
-
Marie-Laure Roussel, Christophe Genthon, Florentin Lemonnier, Gerhard Krinner, Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (UMR 8539) (LMD), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-École polytechnique (X)-École des Ponts ParisTech (ENPC)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Département des Géosciences - ENS Paris, École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL), Institut Pierre-Simon-Laplace (IPSL (FR_636)), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-École polytechnique (X)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité), Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement (IGE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP ), Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), and Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris)
- Subjects
lcsh:GE1-350 ,Complex topography ,Yield (engineering) ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,lcsh:QE1-996.5 ,Resolution (electron density) ,0211 other engineering and technologies ,02 engineering and technology ,[SDU.STU.ME]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Meteorology ,01 natural sciences ,lcsh:Geology ,[SDU]Sciences of the Universe [physics] ,13. Climate action ,Climatology ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,Environmental science ,Precipitation ,Seasonal cycle ,lcsh:Environmental sciences ,021101 geological & geomatics engineering ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Earth-Surface Processes ,Water Science and Technology - Abstract
CMIP5, CMIP6 and ERA5 antarctic precipitations are evaluated against CloudSat data. At continental and regional scales, ERA5 and CMIP models median are biased high, with insignificant improvement from CMIP5 to CMIP6 despite near-surface temperature improvement. However, less models yield outlying overestimation in CMIP6. AMIP configurations perform better than historical ones and, surprisingly, relative errors in areas of complex topography are higher (up to 50 %) in the 5 higher resolution models. The seasonal cycle is well reproduced by the median of the CMIP models but not by ERA5. There is limited progress from CMIP5 to CMIP6 and still room for improvement.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Observed changes in dry-season water availability attributed to human-induced climate change
- Author
-
Hyungjun Kim, Lukas Gudmundsson, Jiafu Mao, Gerhard Krinner, Daniele Peano, Agnès Ducharne, David M. Lawrence, Bertrand Decharme, Ryan S. Padrón, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Centre national de recherches météorologiques (CNRM), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Milieux Environnementaux, Transferts et Interactions dans les hydrosystèmes et les Sols (METIS), École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement (IGE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP ), Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Météo France-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), École pratique des hautes études (EPHE), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), and Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP )
- Subjects
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Global warming ,Climate change ,15. Life on land ,010502 geochemistry & geophysics ,01 natural sciences ,Water resources ,13. Climate action ,Evapotranspiration ,Dry season ,General Earth and Planetary Sciences ,Environmental science ,Climate model ,Precipitation ,Physical geography ,Water cycle ,[SDU.STU.HY]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Hydrology ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
Human-induced climate change impacts the hydrological cycle and thus the availability of water resources. However, previous assessments of observed warming-induced changes in dryness have not excluded natural climate variability and show conflicting results due to uncertainties in our understanding of the response of evapotranspiration. Here we employ data-driven and land-surface models to produce observation-based global reconstructions of water availability from 1902 to 2014, a period during which our planet experienced a global warming of approximately 1 °C. Our analysis reveals a spatial pattern of changes in average water availability during the driest month of the year over the past three decades compared with the first half of the twentieth century, with some regions experiencing increased and some decreased water availability. The global pattern is consistent with climate model estimates that account for anthropogenic effects, and it is not expected from natural climate variability, supporting human-induced climate change as the cause. There is regional evidence of drier dry seasons predominantly in extratropical latitudes and including Europe, western North America, northern Asia, southern South America, Australia and eastern Africa. We also find that the intensification of the dry season is generally a consequence of increasing evapotranspiration rather than decreasing precipitation. Regional changes in dry-season water availability over recent decades can be attributed to human-induced climate change, according to analyses of global reconstructions.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Future ice-sheet surface mass balance and melting in the Amundsen region, West Antarctica
- Author
-
Charles Amory, Hubert Gallée, Gerhard Krinner, Marion Donat-Magnin, Cécile Agosta, Christoph Kittel, Mondher Chekki, and Nicolas C. Jourdain
- Subjects
Coupled model intercomparison project ,geography ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Firn ,Albedo ,010502 geochemistry & geophysics ,Snow ,Atmospheric sciences ,01 natural sciences ,Ice shelf ,Glacier mass balance ,Environmental science ,Ice sheet ,Sea level ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
We present projections of West-Antarctic surface mass balance (SMB) and surface melting to 2080–2100, under the RCP8.5 scenario and based on a regional model at 10 km resolution. Our projections are built by adding a CMIP5 (5th Coupled Model Intercomparison Project) multi-model-mean seasonal climate-change anomaly to the present-day model boundary conditions. Using an anomaly has the advantage to reduce CMIP5 model biases, and a perfect-model test reveals that our approach captures most characteristics of future changes, despite a 16–17 % underestimation of projected SMB and melt rates. SMB over the grounded ice sheet in the sector between Getz and Abbot increases from 336 Gt yr−1 in 1989–2009 to 455 Gt yr−1 in 2080–2100, which would reduce the global sea level changing rate by 0.33 mm yr−1. Snowfall indeed increases by 7.4 to 8.9 % per °C of near-surface warming, due to increasing saturation water vapour pressure in warmer conditions, reduced sea-ice concentrations, and more marine air intrusion. Ice-shelf surface melt rates increase by an order of magnitude along the 21st century, mostly due to higher downward radiation from increased humidity, and to reduced albedo in the presence of melting. Eastern ice shelves (Abbot, Cosgrove and Pine Island) experience significant runoff in the future, while western ice shelves (Thwaites, Crosson, Dotson and Getz) remain without runoff. This is explained by the evolution of the melt-to-snowfall ratio: below a threshold of 0.60 to 0.85, firn air is not entirely depleted by melt water, while entire depletion and runoff occur for higher ratios. This suggests that western ice shelves might remain unaffected by hydrofracturing for more than a century under RCP8.5, while eastern ice shelves have a high potential for hydrofracturing before the end of this century.
- Published
- 2020
36. Twenty first century changes in Antarctic and Southern Ocean surface climate in CMIP6
- Author
-
Lettie A. Roach, F. Alexander Haumann, Thomas J. Bracegirdle, Thomas Rackow, Kaitlin A. Naughten, Ilana Wainer, Gerhard Krinner, and M. Tonelli
- Subjects
Surface (mathematics) ,Atmospheric Science ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,OCEANOS ,projection ,lcsh:QC851-999 ,010502 geochemistry & geophysics ,01 natural sciences ,Projection (mathematics) ,14. Life underwater ,Southern Ocean ,climate ,CMIP6 ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,geography ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,Continental shelf ,Twenty-First Century ,Westerlies ,13. Climate action ,Climatology ,Environmental science ,Antarctic ,lcsh:Meteorology. Climatology ,westerlies ,Ice sheet - Abstract
Two decades into the 21st century there is growing evidence for global impacts of Antarctic and Southern Ocean climate change. Reliable estimates of how the Antarctic climate system would behave under a range of scenarios of future external climate forcing are thus a high priority. Output from new model simulations coordinated as part of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) provides an opportunity for a comprehensive analysis of the latest generation of state‐of‐the‐art climate models following a wider range of experiment types and scenarios than previous CMIP phases. Here the main broad‐scale 21st century Antarctic projections provided by the CMIP6 models are shown across four forcing scenarios: SSP1‐2.6, SSP2‐4.5, SSP3‐7.0 and SSP5‐8.5. End‐of‐century Antarctic surface‐air temperature change across these scenarios (relative to 1995–2014) is 1.3, 2.5, 3.7 and 4.8°C. The corresponding proportional precipitation rate changes are 8, 16, 24 and 31%. In addition to these end‐of‐century changes, an assessment of scenario dependence of pathways of absolute and global‐relative 21st century projections is conducted. Potential differences in regional response are of particular relevance to coastal Antarctica, where, for example, ecosystems and ice shelves are highly sensitive to the timing of crossing of key thresholds in both atmospheric and oceanic conditions. Overall, it is found that the projected changes over coastal Antarctica do not scale linearly with global forcing. We identify two factors that appear to contribute: (a) a stronger global‐relative Southern Ocean warming in stabilisation (SSP2‐4.5) and aggressive mitigation (SSP1‐2.6) scenarios as the Southern Ocean continues to warm and (b) projected recovery of Southern Hemisphere stratospheric ozone and its effect on the mid‐latitude westerlies. The major implication is that over coastal Antarctica, the surface warming by 2100 is stronger relative to the global mean surface warming for the low forcing compared to high forcing future scenarios.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Towards a long term global snow climate data record from satellite data generated within the Snow Climate Change Initiative
- Author
-
Chris Derksen, Andreas Wiesmann, Thomas Nagler, Kathrin Naegeli, Lawrence Mudryk, Kari Luojus, Carlo Marin, David Gustafsson, Lars Keuris, Richard Essery, Arnt-Børre Salberg, Stefan Wunderle, Sari Metsämäki, Anna-Maria Trofaier, Gerhard Krinner, Claudia Notarnicola, Gabriele Schwaizer, and Rune Solberg
- Subjects
Climatology ,Satellite data ,Environmental science ,Climate change ,Snow ,Term (time) - Abstract
Seasonal snow is an important component of the global climate system. It is highly variable in space and time and sensitive to short term synoptic scale processes and long term climate-induced changes of temperature and precipitation. Current snow products derived from various satellite data applying different algorithms show significant discrepancies in extent and snow mass, a potential source for biases in climate monitoring and modelling. The recently launched ESA CCI+ Programme addresses seasonal snow as one of 9 Essential Climate Variables to be derived from satellite data.In the snow_cci project, scheduled for 2018 to 2021 in its first phase, reliable fully validated processing lines are developed and implemented. These tools are used to generate homogeneous multi-sensor time series for the main parameters of global snow cover focusing on snow extent and snow water equivalent. Using GCOS guidelines, the requirements for these parameters are assessed and consolidated using the outcome of workshops and questionnaires addressing users dealing with different climate applications. Snow extent product generation applies algorithms accounting for fractional snow extent and cloud screening in order to generate consistent daily products for snow on the surface (viewable snow) and snow on the surface corrected for forest masking (snow on ground) with global coverage. Input data are medium resolution optical satellite images (AVHRR-2/3, AATSR, MODIS, VIIRS, SLSTR/OLCI) from 1981 to present. An iterative development cycle is applied including homogenisation of the snow extent products from different sensors by minimizing the bias. Independent validation of the snow products is performed for different seasons and climate zones around the globe from 1985 onwards, using as reference high resolution snow maps from Landsat and Sentinel- 2as well as in-situ snow data following standardized validation protocols.Global time series of daily snow water equivalent (SWE) products are generated from passive microwave data from SMMR, SSM/I, and AMSR from 1978 onwards, combined with in-situ snow depth measurements. Long-term stability and quality of the product is assessed using independent snow survey data and by intercomparison with the snow information from global land process models.The usability of the snow_cci products is ensured through the Climate Research Group, which performs case studies related to long term trends of seasonal snow, performs evaluations of CMIP-6 and other snow-focused climate model experiments, and applies the data for simulation of Arctic hydrological regimes.In this presentation, we summarize the requirements and product specifications for the snow extent and SWE products, with a focus on climate applications. We present an overview of the algorithms and systems for generation of the time series. The 40 years (from 1980 onwards) time series of daily fractional snow extent products from AVHRR with 5 km pixel spacing, and the 20-year time series from MODIS (1 km pixel spacing) as well as the coarse resolution (25 km pixel spacing) of daily SWE products from 1978 onwards will be presented along with first results of the multi-sensor consistency checks and validation activities.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Surface mass balance and melting projections over the Amundsen coastal region, West Antarctica
- Author
-
Christoph Kittel, Nicolas C. Jourdain, Mondher Chekki, Marion Donat-Magnin, Gerhard Krinner, Charles Amory, Cécile Agosta, and Hubert Gallée
- Subjects
Glacier mass balance ,Oceanography ,Geology - Abstract
We present Surface Mass Balance (SMB) and surface melt rates projections in West Antarctica for the end of the 21st century using the MAR regional atmosphere and firn model (Gallée 1994; Agosta et al. 2019) forced by a CMIP5-rcp85 multi-model-mean seasonal anomaly added to the ERA-Interim 6-hourly reanalysis. First of all, we assess the validity of our projection method, following a perfect-model approach, with MAR constrained by the ACCESS-1.3 present-day and future climates. Changes in large-scale variables are well captured by our anomaly-based projection method, and errors on surface melting and SMB projections are typically 10%. Based on the CMIP5-rcp85 multi-model mean, SMB over the grounded ice sheet in the Amundsen sector is projected to increase by 35% over the 21st century. This corresponds to a SMB sensitivity to near-surface warming of 8.3%.°C-1. Increased humidity, resulting from both higher water vapour saturation in warmer conditions and decreased sea-ice concentrations, are shown to favour increased SMB in the future scenario. Ice-shelf surface melt rates at the end of the 21st century are projected to become 6 to 15 times larger than presently, depending on the ice shelf under consideration. This is due to enhanced downward longwave radiative fluxes related to increased humidity, and to an albedo feedback leading to more absorption of shortwave radiation. Interestingly, only three ice shelves produce runoff (Abbot, Cosgrove and Pine Island) in the future climate. For the other ice shelves (Thwaites, Crosson, Dotson, Getz), the future melt-to-snowfall ratio remains too low to produce firn air depletion and subsequent runoff.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Dry season water availability changes attributed to human-induced climate change
- Author
-
Hyungjun Kim, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Ryan S. Padrón, Agnès Ducharne, Gerhard Krinner, David M. Lawrence, Daniele Peano, Jiafu Mao, Lukas Gudmundsson, and Bertrand Decharme
- Subjects
Agronomy ,Dry season ,Environmental science ,Climate change - Abstract
Human-induced climate change poses potential impacts on the availability of water resources. Previous assessments of warming-induced changes in dryness, however, are influenced by short observational records and show conflicting results due to uncertainties in the response of evapotranspiration. In this study we use novel observation-based water availability reconstructions from data-driven and land surface models from 1902 to 2014; a period during which the Earth has warmed approximately 1°C relative to pre-industrial conditions. These reconstructions reveal consistent changes in average water availability of the driest month of the year during the last 30 years compared to the first half of the 20th century. We conduct a simple attribution approach based on a spatial correlation analysis between the reconstructions and different climate model simulations. Results indicate that the spatial pattern of changes is extremely likely influenced by human-induced greenhouse gas emissions as it is consistent with climate model estimates that include historical radiative forcing, whereas the pattern is not expected from natural climate variability given by climate simulations with greenhouse gas levels set to pre-industrial conditions. Changes in water availability are characterized by drier dry seasons predominantly in extratropical latitudes and including Europe, Western North America, Northern Asia, Southern South America, Australia, and Eastern Africa. Finally, we find that the intensification of the dry season is generally a consequence of increasing evapotranspiration rather than decreasing precipitation.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. The importance of modelled processes in the evolution of snow cover versus snow mass
- Author
-
María Santolaria-Otín, Carrie M. Vuyovich, Sujay V. Kumar, Gerhard Krinner, Lawrence Mudryk, Claire Brutel-Vuilmet, Chris Derksen, Rhae Sung Kim, and Martin Ménégoz
- Subjects
Environmental science ,Snow ,Atmospheric sciences ,Snow cover - Abstract
Conventional wisdom holds that confidence in future projections of snow cover extent and snow mass requires an understanding of the expected changes in future snow characteristics as a function of modelled snow processes. We will highlight contrasting results which suggest differing importance in the role of sub-grid scale processes on simulations of seasonal snow.The first study is an evaluation of simulated snow cover extent projections from models participating in the 6th phase of the World Climate Research Programme Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project (CMIP-6). We demonstrate a single linear relationship between projected spring snow extent and global surface air temperature (GSAT) changes, which is valid across all future climate scenarios. This finding suggests that Northern Hemisphere spring snow extent will decrease by about 8% relative to the 1995-2014 level per °C of GSAT increase. The sensitivity of snow to temperature forcing largely explains the absence of any climate change pathway dependency, similar to other fast response components of the cryosphere such as sea ice and near surface permafrost.The second study makes use of an ensemble of land surface models, downscaled to 5 km resolution across North America over the 2009-2017 period. In this case, uncertainty in total North American snow mass is dominated by differences among land surface model configurations. While the largest absolute spread in snow mass is found in mountainous regions, heavily vegetated boreal regions have the largest fractional spread compared to climatological values. In particular, differences in rain-snow partitioning and sublimation rates control the largest portions of the total uncertainty. These results suggest that projections of future snow mass depend specifically on how such processes are modelled and parameterized.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Supplementary material to 'Evaluating permafrost physics in the CMIP6 models and their sensitivity to climate change'
- Author
-
Eleanor J. Burke, Yu Zhang, and Gerhard Krinner
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Evaluating permafrost physics in the CMIP6 models and their sensitivity to climate change
- Author
-
Gerhard Krinner, Yu Zhang, and Eleanor J. Burke
- Subjects
Coupled model intercomparison project ,Climatology ,Climate change ,Soil horizon ,Climate model ,Thaw depth ,Mean radiant temperature ,Permafrost ,Snow - Abstract
Permafrost is an important component of the Arctic system and its future fate is likely to control changes in northern high latitude hydrology and biogeochemistry. Here we evaluate the permafrost dynamics in the global models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (present generation – CMIP6; previous generation – CMIP5) along with the the sensitivity of permafrost to climate change. Whilst the northern high latitude air temperatures are relatively well simulated by the climate models, they do introduce a bias into any subsequent model estimate of permafrost. Therefore evaluation metrics are defined in relation to the air temperature. This paper shows the climate, snow and permafrost physics of the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble is very similar to that of the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble. The main difference is that a small number of models have demonstrably better snow insulation in CMIP6 than in CMIP5 which improves their representation of the permafrost extent. The simulation of maximum summer thaw depth does not improve between CMIP5 and CMIP6. We suggest that models should include a better resolved and deeper soil profile as a first step towards addressing this. We use the annual mean thawed volume of the top 2 m of the soil defined from the model soil profiles for the permafrost region to quantify changes in permafrost dynamics. The CMIP6 models suggest this is projected to increase by 20–30 %/°C of global mean temperature increase. Under climate change and in equilibrium this may result in an additional 80–120 Gt C/°C of permafrost carbon becoming vulnerable to decomposition.
- Published
- 2020
43. Historical Northern Hemisphere snow cover trends and projected changes in the CMIP-6 multi-model ensemble
- Author
-
Mike Brady, Claire Brutel-Vuilmet, María Santolaria-Otín, Chris Derksen, Gerhard Krinner, Richard Essery, Lawrence Mudryk, Martin Ménégoz, Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement (IGE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP ), and Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)
- Subjects
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,0207 environmental engineering ,Climate change ,02 engineering and technology ,Forcing (mathematics) ,Permafrost ,01 natural sciences ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Sea ice ,Cryosphere ,020701 environmental engineering ,lcsh:Environmental sciences ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Earth-Surface Processes ,Water Science and Technology ,030304 developmental biology ,lcsh:GE1-350 ,geography ,0303 health sciences ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,lcsh:QE1-996.5 ,Northern Hemisphere ,Snow ,lcsh:Geology ,13. Climate action ,Climatology ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,Environmental science ,Snow cover ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
This paper presents an analysis of observed and simulated historical snow cover extent and snow mass, along with future snow cover projections from models participating in the World Climate Research Programme Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). Where appropriate, the CMIP6 output is compared to CMIP5 results in order to assess progress (or absence thereof) between successive model generations. An ensemble of six observation-based products is used to produce a new time series of historical Northern Hemisphere snow extent anomalies and trends; a subset of four of these products is used for snow mass. Trends in snow extent over 1981–2018 are negative in all months and exceed -50×103 km2 yr−1 during November, December, March, and May. Snow mass trends are approximately −5 Gt yr−1 or more for all months from December to May. Overall, the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble better represents the snow extent climatology over the 1981–2014 period for all months, correcting a low bias in CMIP5. Simulated snow extent and snow mass trends over the 1981–2014 period are stronger in CMIP6 than in CMIP5, although large inter-model spread remains in the simulated trends for both variables. There is a single linear relationship between projected spring snow extent and global surface air temperature (GSAT) changes, which is valid across all CMIP6 Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. This finding suggests that Northern Hemisphere spring snow extent will decrease by about 8 % relative to the 1995–2014 level per degree Celsius of GSAT increase. The sensitivity of snow to temperature forcing largely explains the absence of any climate change pathway dependency, similar to other fast-response components of the cryosphere such as sea ice and near-surface permafrost extent.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. Supplementary material to 'Historical Northern Hemisphere snow cover trends and projected changes in the CMIP-6 multi-model ensemble'
- Author
-
Lawrence Mudryk, Maria Santolaria-Otín, Gerhard Krinner, Martin Ménégoz, Chris Derksen, Claire Brutel-Vuilmet, Mike Brady, and Richard Essery
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Climate Response to Negative Greenhouse Gas Radiative Forcing in Polar Winter
- Author
-
Xiuhong Chen, Gerhard Krinner, Mark Flanner, Xianglei Huang, Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement (IGE), and Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP )-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019] (UGA [2016-2019])
- Subjects
[SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Radiative forcing ,010502 geochemistry & geophysics ,Atmospheric sciences ,01 natural sciences ,Geophysics ,Greenhouse gas ,General Earth and Planetary Sciences ,Environmental science ,Polar ,Climate response ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS ,Polar climate ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
International audience
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Mass balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2017
- Author
-
Ted Scambos, Richard I. Cullather, Helmut Rott, David N. Wiese, Valentina R. Barletta, Isabella Velicogna, Brice Noël, Jeremie Mouginot, Edward Hanna, Melchior van Wessem, W. Richard Peltier, Thomas Nagler, Alejandro Blazquez, Eric Rignot, Jennifer Bonin, Nadege Pie, Veit Helm, Bernd Scheuchl, Louise Sandberg-Sørensen, Brian Gunter, Ines Otosaka, Ben Smith, Denis Felikson, Benoit S. Lecavalier, Bryant D. Loomis, Cécile Agosta, Peter L. Langen, Wouter van der Wal, Christopher Harig, René Forsberg, Philip Moore, Giorgio Spada, Ernst Schrama, Alex S. Gardner, T. C. Sutterley, Matthieu Talpe, Daniele Melini, Xavier Fettweis, Andreas Groh, Gerhard Krinner, Bert Wouters, Sebastian H. Mernild, Kate Briggs, Andreas P. Ahlstrøm, Erik R. Ivins, Shfaqat Abbas Khan, Johan Nilsson, Hannes Konrad, Nicole Schlegel, Sebastian B. Simonsen, Kristian K. Kjeldsen, Greg Babonis, Malcolm McMillan, Pippa L. Whitehouse, Ingo Sasgen, Lev Tarasov, Ki-Weon Seo, Lin Gilbert, Geruo A, Yara Mohajerani, Scott B. Luthcke, Gorka Moyano, Andrew Shepherd, Thomas Slater, Michiel R. van den Broeke, Bramha Dutt Vishwakarma, Roelof Rietbroek, Alexander Horvath, Hubert Gallée, Tony Payne, Willem Jan van de Berg, Martin Horwath, Alan Muir, Ian Joughin, Beata Csatho, Himanshu Save, Mark E. Pattle, Sophie Nowicki, Ludwig Schröder, Grace A. Nield, Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement (IGE), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP )-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019] (UGA [2016-2019]), Andrew Shepherd, Erik Ivin, Eric Rignot, Ben Smith, Michiel VDBroeke, Isabella Velicogna, Pippa Whitehouse, Kate Brigg, Ian Joughin, Gerhard Krinner, Sophie Nowicki, Tony Payne, Ted Scambo, Nicole Schlegel, Geruo A, Cécile Agosta, Andreas Ahlstrøm, Greg Baboni, Valentina Barletta, Alejandro Blazquez, Jennifer Bonin, Beata Csatho, Richard Cullather, Denis Felikson, Xavier Fettwei, Rene Forsberg, Hubert Gallee, Alex Gardner, Lin Gilbert, Andreas Groh, Brian Gunter, Edward Hanna, Christopher Harig, Veit Helm, Alexander Horvath, Martin Horwath, Shfaqat Khan, Kristian Kjeldsen, Hannes Konrad, Peter Langen, Benoit Lecavalier, Bryant Loomi, Scott Luthcke, Malcolm McMillan, Daniele Melini, Sebastian Mernild, Yara Mohajerani, Philip Moore, Jeremie Mouginot, Gorka Moyano, Alan Muir, Thomas Nagler, Grace Nield, Johan Nilsson, Brice Noel, Ines Otosaka, Mark Pattle, William Peltier, Nadege Pie, Roelof Rietbroek, Helmut Rott, LouiseSandberg Sørensen, Ingo Sasgen, Himanshu Save, Bernd Scheuchl, Ernst Schrama, Ludwig Schröder, KiWeon Seo, Sebastian Simonsen, Tom Slater, Giorgio Spada, Tyler Sutterley, Matthieu Talpe, Lev Tarasov, Willem JVdeBerg, Wouter vanderWal, Melchior van Wessem, BramhaDutt Vishwakarma, David Wiese, Bert Wouters, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), University of California [Irvine] (UCI), University of California, Laboratoire de glaciologie et géophysique de l'environnement (LGGE), Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers de Grenoble (OSUG), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP)-Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)-Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP)-Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)-Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), and Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)
- Subjects
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,[SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes ,Climate change ,Antarctic ice sheet ,NN ,010502 geochemistry & geophysics ,01 natural sciences ,Glacier mass balance ,Peninsula ,Taverne ,SDG 13 - Climate Action ,F890 Geographical and Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified ,Sea level ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,geography ,Multidisciplinary ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,Post-glacial rebound ,Balance (accounting) ,13. Climate action ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,Environmental science ,Physical geography ,Tonne - Abstract
The Antarctic Ice Sheet is an important indicator of climate change and driver of sea-level rise. Here we combine satellite observations of its changing volume, flow and gravitational attraction with modelling of its surface mass balance to show that it lost 2,720 ± 1,390 billion tonnes of ice between 1992 and 2017, which corresponds to an increase in mean sea level of 7.6 ± 3.9 millimetres (errors are one standard deviation). Over this period, ocean-driven melting has caused rates of ice loss from West Antarctica to increase from 53 ± 29 billion to 159 ± 26 billion tonnes per year; ice-shelf collapse has increased the rate of ice loss from the Antarctic Peninsula from 7 ± 13 billion to 33 ± 16 billion tonnes per year. We find large variations in and among model estimates of surface mass balance and glacial isostatic adjustment for East Antarctica, with its average rate of mass gain over the period 1992–2017 (5 ± 46 billion tonnes per year) being the least certain.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Antarctica-Regional Climate and Surface Mass Budget
- Author
-
Charles Amory, Vincent Favier, Julien Beaumet, Hubert Gallée, Gerhard Krinner, and Cécile Agosta
- Subjects
Atmospheric Science ,Global and Planetary Change ,geography ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Climate oscillation ,Climate change ,Future sea level ,010502 geochemistry & geophysics ,Atmospheric sciences ,01 natural sciences ,Ice-sheet model ,Effects of global warming ,Climatology ,Cryosphere ,Climate model ,Ice sheet ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
We review recent literature on atmospheric, surface ocean and sea-ice observations and modeling results in the Antarctic sector and relate the observed climatic trends with the potential changes in the surface mass balance (SMB) of the ice sheet since 1900. Estimates of regional scale SMB distribution and trends remain subject to large uncertainties. Approaches combining and comparing multiple satellite and model-based assessments of ice sheet mass balance aim at reducing these knowledge gaps. During the last decades, significant changes in atmospheric circulation occurred around Antarctica, due to the exceptional positive trend in the Southern Annular Mode and to the climate variability observed in the tropical Pacific at the end of the twentieth century. Even though climate over the East Antarctic Ice-Sheet remained quite stable, a warming and precipitation increase was observed over the West Antarctic Ice-Sheet and over the West Antarctic Peninsula (AP) during the twentieth century. However, the high regional climate variability overwhelms climate changes associated to human drivers of global temperature changes, as reflected by a slight recent decadal cooling trend over the AP. Climate models still fail to accurately reproduce the multi-decadal SMB trends at a regional scale, and progress has to be achieved in reproducing atmospheric circulation changes related to complex ocean/ice/atmosphere interactions. Complex processes are also still insufficiently considered, such as (1) specific polar atmospheric processes (clouds, drifting snow, and stable boundary layer physics), (2) surface firn physics involved in the surface drag variations, or in firn air depletion and albedo feedbacks. Finally, progress in reducing the uncertainties relative to projections of the future SMB of Antarctica will largely depend on climate model capability to correctly consider teleconnections with low and mid-latitudes, and on the ability to correct them for biases, taking into account the coupling between ocean, ice, and atmosphere in high southern latitudes.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Terrestrial ecosystem model performance in simulating productivity and its vulnerability to climate change in the northern permafrost region
- Author
-
Theodore J. Bohn, Lifen Jiang, Weiya Zhang, Yiqi Luo, Philippe Ciais, Eleanor J. Burke, Tomohiro Hajima, Shushi Peng, Christine Delire, Bertrand Decharme, Ramdane Alkama, Annette Rinke, Guangsheng Chen, Zheng Shi, Liming Yan, Isabelle Gouttevin, Kazuyuki Saito, Junyi Liang, Duoying Ji, A. David McGuire, Andrew H. MacDougall, Benjamin Smith, Kun Huang, Charles D. Koven, Jianyang Xia, Paul A. Miller, John C. Moore, Dennis P. Lettenmaier, Tetsuo Sueyoshi, Qian Zhang, Gerhard Krinner, David M. Lawrence, Daniel J. Hayes, Xiaodong Chen, East China Normal University [Shangaï] (ECNU), Centre national de recherches météorologiques (CNRM), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Météo France-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] (LSCE), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement (IGE), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP )-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019] (UGA [2016-2019]), ICOS-ATC (ICOS-ATC), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), Hydrologie-Hydraulique (UR HHLY), Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA), European Project: 282700,EC:FP7:ENV,FP7-ENV-2011,PAGE21(2011), Météo France-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Paris-Saclay-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire de glaciologie et géophysique de l'environnement (LGGE), Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers de Grenoble (OSUG), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP)-Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)-Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP)-Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)-Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP )-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019] (UGA [2016-2019]), and Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Atmospheric Science ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,vulnerability ,Soil Science ,Climate change ,snow ,Aquatic Science ,VULNERABILITE ,Permafrost ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Water Science and Technology ,climatic change ,Ecology ,Global warming ,Northern Hemisphere ,Paleontology ,Primary production ,Forestry ,15. Life on land ,Climate Action ,Geophysics ,Arctic ,13. Climate action ,CHANGEMENT CLIMATIQUE ,Climatology ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,Environmental science ,Terrestrial ecosystem ,Moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer ,NEIGE - Abstract
©2017. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved. Realistic projection of future climate-carbon (C) cycle feedbacks requires better understanding and an improved representation of the C cycle in permafrost regions in the current generation of Earth system models. Here we evaluated 10 terrestrial ecosystem models for their estimates of net primary productivity (NPP) and responses to historical climate change in permafrost regions in the Northern Hemisphere. In comparison with the satellite estimate from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS; 246 ± 6 g C m−2 yr−1), most models produced higher NPP (309 ± 12 g C m−2 yr−1) over the permafrost region during 2000–2009. By comparing the simulated gross primary productivity (GPP) with a flux tower-based database, we found that although mean GPP among the models was only overestimated by 10% over 1982–2009, there was a twofold discrepancy among models (380 to 800 g C m−2 yr−1), which mainly resulted from differences in simulated maximum monthly GPP (GPPmax). Most models overestimated C use efficiency (CUE) as compared to observations at both regional and site levels. Further analysis shows that model variability of GPP and CUE are nonlinearly correlated to variability in specific leaf area and the maximum rate of carboxylation by the enzyme Rubisco at 25°C (Vcmax_25), respectively. The models also varied in their sensitivities of NPP, GPP, and CUE to historical changes in climate and atmospheric CO2 concentration. These results indicate that model predictive ability of the C cycle in permafrost regions can be improved by better representation of the processes controlling CUE and GPPmax as well as their sensitivity to climate change.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. The weakening relationship between Eurasian spring snow cover and Indian summer monsoon rainfall
- Author
-
Thomas Gasser, Shushi Peng, Xiaoyi Wang, Tandong Yao, Gerhard Krinner, Tao Wang, Taotao Zhang, Shilong Piao, Key Laboratory of Alpine Ecology and Biodiversity, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research - Chinese Academy of Sciences, Peking University [Beijing], and Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Tibetan Plateau Res, Key Lab Tibetan Environm Changes & Land Surface P, Beijing, Peoples R China
- Subjects
Climatology ,[SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere ,geography ,Multidisciplinary ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,Plateau ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,0208 environmental biotechnology ,SciAdv r-articles ,02 engineering and technology ,Snow ,01 natural sciences ,020801 environmental engineering ,Atmosphere ,Indian summer monsoon rainfall ,Indian summer monsoon ,Spring (hydrology) ,Environmental science ,Negative correlation ,Snow cover ,Research Articles ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Research Article - Abstract
Eurasian spring snow cover may not be a faithful predictor of the Indian summer monsoon rainfall in a changing climate., Substantial progress has been made in understanding how Eurasian snow cover variabilities affect the Indian summer monsoon, but the snow-monsoon relationship in a warming atmosphere remains controversial. Using long-term observational snow and rainfall data (1967–2015), we identified that the widely recognized inverse relationship of central Eurasian spring snow cover with the Indian summer monsoon rainfall has disappeared since 1990. The apparent loss of this negative correlation is mainly due to the central Eurasian spring snow cover no longer regulating the summer mid-tropospheric temperature over the Iranian Plateau and surroundings, and hence the land-ocean thermal contrast after 1990. A reduced lagged snow-hydrological effect, resulting from a warming-induced decline in spring snow cover, constitutes the possible mechanism for the breakdown of the snow-air temperature connection after 1990. Our results suggest that, in a changing climate, Eurasian spring snow cover may not be a faithful predictor of the Indian summer monsoon rainfall.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Assessing bias corrections of oceanic surface conditions for atmospheric models
- Author
-
Rein Haarsma, Julien Beaumet, Gerhard Krinner, Michel Déqué, Laurent Li, Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement (IGE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP )-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019] (UGA [2016-2019]), Centre national de recherches météorologiques (CNRM), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Météo France-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (UMR 8539) (LMD), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-École polytechnique (X)-École des Ponts ParisTech (ENPC)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Département des Géosciences - ENS Paris, École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), and Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL)
- Subjects
[SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Atmospheric models ,Anomaly (natural sciences) ,lcsh:QE1-996.5 ,0207 environmental engineering ,Boundary (topology) ,02 engineering and technology ,Function (mathematics) ,[SDU.STU.ME]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Meteorology ,Atmospheric sciences ,01 natural sciences ,lcsh:Geology ,Constraint (information theory) ,Sea surface temperature ,13. Climate action ,Consistency (statistics) ,Environmental science ,020701 environmental engineering ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Downscaling - Abstract
Future sea surface temperature and sea-ice concentration from coupled ocean–atmosphere general circulation models such as those from the CMIP5 experiment are often used as boundary forcings for the downscaling of future climate experiments. Yet, these models show some considerable biases when compared to the observations over present climate. In this paper, existing methods such as an absolute anomaly method and a quantile–quantile method for sea surface temperature (SST) as well as a look-up table and a relative anomaly method for sea-ice concentration (SIC) are presented. For SIC, we also propose a new analogue method. Each method is objectively evaluated with a perfect model test using CMIP5 model experiments and some real-case applications using observations. We find that with respect to other previously existing methods, the analogue method is a substantial improvement for the bias correction of future SIC. Consistency between the constructed SST and SIC fields is an important constraint to consider, as is consistency between the prescribed sea-ice concentration and thickness; we show that the latter can be ensured by using a simple parameterisation of sea-ice thickness as a function of instantaneous and annual minimum SIC.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.