Search

Recombinant protein therapeutics, vaccines, and plasma products have a long record of safety. However, the use of cell culture to produce recombinant proteins is still susceptible to contamination with viruses. These contaminations cost millions of dollars to recover from, can lead to patients not receiving therapies, and are very rare, which makes learning from past events difficult. A consortium of biotech companies, together with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has convened to collect data on these events. This industry-wide study provides insights into the most common viral contaminants, the source of those contaminants, the cell lines affected, corrective actions, as well as the impact of such events. These results have implications for the safe and effective production of not just current products, but also emerging cell and gene therapies which have shown much therapeutic promise.

Appropriate segregation within manufacturing facilities is required by regulators and utilized by manufacturers to ensure that the final product has not been contaminated with (a) adventitious viruses, (b) another pre-/postviral clearance fraction of the same product, or (c) another product processed in the same facility. However, there is no consensus on what constitutes appropriate facility segregation to minimize these risks. In part, this is due to the fact that a wide variety of manufacturing facilities and operational practices exist, including single-product and multiproduct manufacturing, using traditional segregation strategies with separate rooms for specific operations that may use stainless steel or disposable equipment to more modern ballroom-style operations that use mostly disposable equipment (i.e., pre- and postviral clearance manufacturing operations are not physically segregated by walls). Further, consensus is lacking around basic definitions and approaches related to facility segregation. For example, given that several unit operations provide assurance of virus clearance during downstream processing, how does one define pre- and postviral clearance and at which point(s) should a viral segregation barrier be introduced? What is a "functionally closed" system? How can interventions be conducted so that the system remains functionally closed? How can functionally closed systems be used to adequately isolate a product stream and ensure its safety? To address these issues, the member companies of the Consortium on Adventitious Agent Contamination in Biomanufacturing (CAACB) have conducted a facility segregation project with the following goals: define "pre- and postviral clearance zones" and "pre- and postviral clearance materials"; define "functionally closed" manufacturing systems; and identify an array of facility segregation approaches that are used for the safe and effective production of recombinant biologics as well as plasma products. This article reflects the current thinking from this collaborative endeavor. LAY ABSTRACT: Operations in biopharmaceutical manufacturing are segregated to ensure that the final product has not been contaminated with adventitious viruses, another fraction of the same product, or with another product from within the same facility. Yet there is no consensus understanding of what appropriate facility segregation looks like. There are a wide variety of manufacturing facilities and operational practices. There are existing facilities with separate rooms and more modern approaches that use disposable equipment in an open ballroom without walls. There is also no agreement on basic definitions and approaches related to facility segregation approaches. For example, many would like to claim that their manufacturing process is functionally closed, yet exactly how a functionally closed system may be defined is not clear. To address this, the member companies of the Consortium on Adventitious Agent Contamination in Biomanufacturing (CAACB) have conducted a project with the goal of defining important manufacturing terms relevant to designing an appropriately segregated facility and identifying different facility segregation approaches that are used for the safe and effective production of recombinant biologics as well as plasma products., (© PDA, Inc. 2019.)

Anti-neuraminidase (NA) antibodies (Ab) play a role in protection against influenza and in combination with anti-HA Ab they increase the protection in mice. To control the NA content of vaccines, which should improve vaccine standardisation and may benefit vaccine efficacy, a series of questions must be addressed: 1) The antigenic characterization of NA in vaccine strains and seed lots is based on the measurement of the enzymatic (E) activity using fetuin as substrate. The antigenic profile is established by inhibiting the E activity with post infectious ferret antisera. Overnight incubation ensures sensitivity, and fetuin substrate gives specificity by detection of variant specific antibodies. Several difficulties have to be overcome, such as the low level of E activity in MDCK grown viruses, and the lability of N1. 2) The NA protein content of the vaccines (in bulk or final product) can be measured by an ELISA capture test but the lability of the NA proteins at 4 degrees C must be checked. 3) The anti NA Ab response can be measured using a neuraminidase inhibition test. --The steric hindrance by HI antibodies does not exceed a titre of 20 in human sera. --Triton treatment of viruses reduces the steric hindrance in polyclonal sera and monoclonal antibodies but unmasks epitopes. 4) The correlations between neuraminidase inhibition, neutralization and protection, has been established in the mouse model, but remains to be shown in humans. 5) The use of a small fluorescent (MUN) or chemiluminescent (NA-STAR) substrate can be used for the rapid differentiation of N1 from N2 and NB, but not for the titration of protective NI antibodies.

For improving the anti-influenza vaccination efficacy, the choice of strains carrying up dated neuraminidase antigen (NA) and the introduction of the optimal amount of NA antigen in the vaccine are critical. Monoclonal antibodies prepared against the neuraminidase N2 of A/Beijing/32/92 showed NA inhibition (NI) and neutralized (Nt) the cells infection by influenza virus either at an early stage (group 2 antibodies inhibit virus binding to cells) or at a late stage of infection (group 1 antibodies inhibit virus release). The specificity of the neutralization test is restricted to the homologous variant whereas the NI specificity is much broader. When both group 1 and group 2 antibodies are tested together, their neutralizing activity is significantly increased. The emergence in 1997 of an avian strain H5N1 in humans influenza infections at Hong Kong (Strain A/Hong-Kong/156/97) rose the threat of pandemic. The H5N1 strain carried H5 HA which is not recognized by the human immune system, but N1 might be related to other N1 antigens belonging to avian, swine and human strains. So we 1) characterized the N1 antigen from H5N1 in comparison with other known antigens, 2) we looked for anti N1 (H5N1) antibodies in humans according to the age and the vaccination status, 3) we checked the neutralizing activity of anti N1 antibodies. The N1 antigen (H5N1) appeared closely related to N1 from swine strains: Sw/31 correlated itself to the pandemic spanish virus (1918-19), and more recent swine isolates from 1982 and 1989. The anti N1 (H5N1) antibodies were present in sera collected from 75+ years old persons and these N1 antibodies were neutralizing H5N1 cells infection. Consequently, 75+ years old persons do not represent a priority group for vaccination in the case of H5N1 pandemic conditions.

This paper analyses the performance of MAbMax(TM)/Tricentric(TM), a new generation hollow fibre bioreactor, for hybridoma growth and antibody productivity, the down stream processing of monoclonal antibody harvests throughout the run and the further control of antibody quality consistency. Handling and process parameters were optimised using a mouse hybridoma, IgG1(K) secretor, and then confirmed with several other hybridomas. Cells were kept at optimal viability during an unusually long period of time and a continuously high production of antibodies was detected over several months. Foetal bovine serum concentration was reduced to 1\% and the effects of weaning of cells from serum were monitored in terms of cell metabolism and antibody productivity. Antibody harvests collected at regular intervals throughout the run (2 to 12 weeks) were purified using affinity chromatography on a recombinant protein A/G matrix and then analysed in terms of antigen binding properties, isoelectric forms and oligosaccharide structures, in order 1) to control antibody quality consistency as a function of time and serum concentration and 2) to compare antibody characteristics as a function of culture conditions, in vitro bioreactor cultivation versus in vivo mouse ascite cultivation.