Search

OBJECTIVE Radiological progression occurs in 50%–60% of residual nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a safe and effective management option for residual NFPAs, but there is no consensus on its optimal timing. This study aims to define the optimal timing of SRS for residual NFPAs. METHODS This retrospective, multicenter study involved 375 patients with residual NFPAs managed with SRS. The patients were divided into adjuvant (ADJ; treated for stable residual NFPA within 6 months of resection) and progression (PRG) cohorts (treated for residual NFPA progression). Factors associated with tumor progression and clinical deterioration were analyzed. RESULTS Following propensity-score matching, each cohort consisted of 130 patients. At last follow-up, tumor control was achieved in 93.1% of patients in the ADJ cohort and in 96.2% of patients in the PRG cohort (HR 1.6, 95% CI 0.55–4.9, p = 0.37). Hypopituitarism was associated with a maximum point dose of > 8 Gy to the pituitary stalk (HR 4.5, 95% CI 1.6–12.6, p = 0.004). No statistically significant difference was noted in crude new-onset hypopituitarism rates (risk difference [RD] = −0.8%, p > 0.99) or visual deficits (RD = −2.3%, p = 0.21) between the two cohorts at the last follow-up. The median time from resection to new hypopituitarism was longer in the PRG cohort (58.9 vs 29.7 months, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS SRS at residual NFPA progression does not appear to alter the probability of tumor control or hormonal/visual deficits compared with adjuvant SRS. Deferral of radiosurgical management to the time of radiological progression could significantly prolong the time to radiosurgically induced pituitary dysfunction. A lower maximum point dose (< 8 Gy) to the pituitary stalk portended a more favorable chance of preserving pituitary function after SRS.

Surgery is the treatment of choice for large vestibular schwannomas (VS). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been suggested as an alternative to resection in selected patients. However, the safety and efficacy of SRS in Koos grade IV patients ≤ 45 years old has not been evaluated. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical and radiological outcomes of Koos grade IV in young patient managed with a single-session SRS.This retrospective, multicenter analysis included SRS-treated patients, ≤ 45 years old presenting with non-life threatening or incapacitating symptoms due to a Koos Grade IV VS and with follow-up ≥ 12 months. Tumor control and neurological outcomes were evaluated.176 patients [median age of 36.0 (IQR 9) and median tumor volume of 9.3 cmSingle-session SRS is a safe and effective alternative to surgical resection in selected patients ≤ 45 years old particularly those with medical co-morbidities and those who decline resection. Longer term follow up is warranted.

The role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of recurrent and residual intracranial primary melanocytomas (PMC) remains unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SRS in the management of these rare tumors.One patient treated with SRS in our institution for an intracranial PMC was retrospectively identified. Additionally, a systematic review of English articles using MEDLINE was performed to identify studies reporting on treatment and tumor characteristics and patient outcomes following SRS-management of intracranial PMC.Including our institution's patient, a total of 13 patients (11 male and 2 female) met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The median age at SRS treatment was 49 years (interquartile range [IQR] 27). At a median follow-up of 24 (IQR 48) months, the aggregate local tumor-control rate was 76.9%. Progression occurred in 3 patients and was managed with repeat SRS (1 of 13) or salvage resection (2 of 13). One case of malignant transformation to melanoma leading to leptomeningeal dissemination and death was noted.SRS appears to be a reasonable treatment option for recurrent and residual melanocytomas. A higher prescription dose might be reasonable in the treatment of intermediate grade or recurring PMC. Close longitudinal follow-up for recurrence or malignant transformation of melanocytomas after SRS is recommended.

The optimal management of asymptomatic, presumed WHO grade I meningiomas remains controversial.To define the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) compared with active surveillance for the management of patients with asymptomatic parafalcine/parasagittal (PFPS) meningiomas.Data from SRS-treated patients from 14 centers and patients managed conservatively for an asymptomatic, PFPS meningioma were compared. Local tumor control rate and new neurological deficits development were evaluated in the active surveillance and the SRS-treated cohorts.There were 173 SRS-treated patients and 98 patients managed conservatively in the unmatched cohorts. After matching for patient age and tumor volume, there were 98 patients in each cohort. The median radiological follow-up period was 43 months for the SRS cohort and 36 months for the active surveillance cohort (P = .04). The median clinical follow-up for the SRS and active surveillance cohorts were 44 and 36 months, respectively. Meningioma control was noted in all SRS-treated patients and in 61.2% of patients managed with active surveillance (P.001). SRS-related neurological deficits occurred in 3.1% of the patients (n = 3), which were all transient. In the active surveillance cohort, 2% of patients (n = 2) developed neurological symptoms because of tumor progression (P = 1.0), resulting in death of 1 patient (1%).Up-front SRS affords superior radiological PFPS meningioma control as compared with active surveillance and may lower the risk of meningioma-related permanent neurological deficit and/or death.

Objective: the optimal management of asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas is not well defined. The aim of this study is to compare the imaging and clinical outcomes of patients with asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas managed either with upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or active surveillance. Methods: this retrospective, multicenter study involved patients with asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas. The study end-points included local tumor control and the development of new neurological deficits attributable to the tumor. Factors associated with tumor progression and neurological morbidity were also analyzed. Results: the combined unmatched cohort included 417 patients. Following propensity score matching for age, tumor volume, and follow-up 110 patients remained in each cohort. Tumor control was achieved in 98.2% and 61.8% of the SRS and active surveillance cohorts, respectively. SRS was associated with superior local tumor control (p < 0.001, HR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.002-0.13) compared to active surveillance. Three patients (2.7%) in the SRS cohort and six (5.5%) in the active surveillance cohort exhibited neurological deterioration. One (0.9%) patient in the SRS-treated and 11 (10%) patients in the active surveillance cohort required surgical management of their meningioma during follow-up. Conclusions: SRS is associated with superior local control of asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas as compared to active surveillance and does so with low morbidity rates. SRS should be offered as an alternative to active surveillance as the initial management of asymptomatic skull base meningiomas. Active surveillance policies do not currently specify the optimal time to intervention when meningioma growth is noted. Our results indicate that if active surveillance is the initial management of choice, SRS should be recommended when radiologic tumor progression is noted and prior to clinical progression., NA

Objective The optimal management of intraventricular metastases remains debatable. The aim of this study is to define the safety and efficacy of Gamma-Knife radiosurgery in the treatment of intraventricular metastases. Methods This retrospective, single-center study involved patients that were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for intraventricular metastases. The study end points included SRS-related toxicity, local and distal intracranial tumor control, as well as the incidence of post-treatment hydrocephalus and leptomeningeal dissemination. Factors associated with radiologic and clinical outcomes were also analyzed. Results The cohort included 17 consecutive patients who underwent stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of 41 intracranial metastases, of which 23 were primary intraventricular (intraventricular metastasis). Median overall survival from primary tumor diagnosis and from SRS treatment were 28 and 5 months, respectively. With a median radiological follow-up of 3 (interquartile range 3) months, 7 patients (41.18%) experienced overall intracranial disease progression, whereas 7 (27.27%) intraventricular metastases progressed radiologically. Four (23.53%) and 3 (17.65%) patients developed hydrocephalus and leptomeningeal dissemination post-SRS, respectively. Four patients (23.53%) died due to intracranial disease progression. Conclusions SRS offers a reasonable chance of local tumor control for patients with intraventricular brain metastasis. However, the risk of hydrocephalus and leptomeningeal spread of disease is not inconsequential and merits close follow-up for patients with brain metastasis involving the ventricular system.

The management of craniopharyngiomas is challenging, usually requiring multidisciplinary care. We evaluated the long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for craniopharyngiomas. This retrospective study involved patients managed with GKRS for a craniopharyngioma during the period of 1989 to 2019. Patient clinical and radiologic data, tumor characteristics, and procedural details were analyzed. Thirty-eight consecutive patients (24 males; mean patient age at GKRS = 30.82 years [SD ± 20.45 years]) were treated with GKRS for craniopharyngioma. Overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 84.1% and 80.1%, respectively. Progression-free survival at 5 years was 48.1%, and, at 10 years, it was 29.8%. Risk factors for post-GKRS clinical deterioration were increasing number of isocenters used (p = 0.04 (HR1.32, CI 1–1.73)), increasing margin dose [p = 0.02 (HR1.52, CI 1.31–1.84)], and maximum dose > 35 Gy [p = 0.002 (HR1.35, CI 1.11–1.63)]. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) appears a safe and effective management option in selected craniopharyngioma patients. Increasing margin dose and maximum dose > 35 Gy are associated with an increased risk for post-SRS neurologic deficit. Further, well-designed studies are necessary to determine the optimal timing and SRS parameters and to identify which patients with craniopharyngioma will benefit the most from SRS.

Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and resection are treatment options for patients with facial nerve schwannomas without mass effect. Objective This article evaluates outcomes of patients treated with SRS versus resection + SRS. Method We retrospectively compared 43 patients treated with SRS to 12 patients treated with resection + SRS. The primary study outcome was unfavorable combined endpoint, defined as worsening or new clinical symptoms, and/or tumor radiological progression. SRS (38.81 ± 5.3) and resection + SRS (67.14 ± 11.8) groups had similar clinical follow-ups. Results At the time of SRS, the tumor volumes of SRS (mean ± standard error; 1.83 ± 0.35 mL) and resection + SRS (2.51 ± 0.75 mL) groups were similar. SRS (12.15 ± 0.08 Gy) and resection + SRS (12.16 ± 0.14 Gy) groups received similar radiation doses. SRS group (42/43, 98%) had better local tumor control than the resection + SRS group (10/12, 83%, p = 0.04). Most of SRS (32/43, 74%) and resection + SRS (10/12, 83%) group patients reached a favorable combined endpoint following SRS (p = 0.52). Considering surgical associated side effects, only 2/10 patients of the resection + SRS group reached a favorable endpoint (p Patients of SRS group, who are > 34 years old (p = 0.02), have larger tumors (> 4 mL, 0.04), internal auditory canal (IAC) segment tumor involvement (p = 0.01) were more likely to reach an unfavorable endpoint. Resection + SRS group patients did not show such a difference. Conclusion While resection is still needed for larger tumors, SRS offers better clinical and radiological outcomes compared to resection followed by SRS for facial schwannomas. Younger age, smaller tumors, and non-IAC situated tumors are factors that portend a favorable outcome.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can be used in acromegaly patients to achieve endocrine remission. In this study we evaluate the biological effective dose (BED) as a predictor of SRS outcomes for acromegaly.This retrospective, single-center study included patients treated with single-fraction SRS with growth hormone secreting pituitary adenomas and available endocrine follow-up. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to study endocrine remission, new pituitary deficit, and tumor control. Cox analyses were performed using two models [margin dose (model 2) versus BED (model 1)].Sixty-seven patients (53.7% male) with a median age of 46.8 years (IQR 21.2) were treated using a median dose of 25 Gy (IQR 5), and a median BED of 171.9GyBED is a strong predictor of endocrine remission in patients treated with SRS. Dose planning and optimization of the BED to 170Gy

Surgery is the preferred treatment for large vestibular schwannomas (VS). Good tumor control and cranial nerve outcomes were described in selected Koos IV VS after single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), but outcomes in elderly patients have never been specifically studied. The aim of this study is to report clinical and radiological outcomes after single-session SRS for Koos IV VS in patients ≥ 65 years old.This multicenter, retrospective study included patients ≥ 65 years old, treated with primary, single-session SRS for a Koos IV VS, and at least 12 months of follow-up. Patients with life-threatening or incapacitating symptoms were excluded. Tumor control rate, hearing, trigeminal, and facial nerve function were studied at last follow-up.One-hundred and fifty patients (median age of 71.0 (IQR 9.0) years old with a median tumor volume of 8.3 cc (IQR 4.4)) were included. The median prescription dose was 12.0 Gy (IQR 1.4). The local tumor control rate was 96.0% and 86.2% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Early tumor expansion occurred in 6.7% and was symptomatic in 40% of cases. A serviceable hearing was present in 16.1% prior to SRS and in 7.4% at a last follow-up of 46.5 months (IQR 55.8). The actuarial serviceable hearing preservation rate was 69.3% and 50.9% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Facial nerve function preservation or improvement rates at 5 and 10 years were 98.7% and 91.0%, respectively. At last follow-up, the trigeminal nerve function was improved in 14.0%, stable in 80.7%, and worsened in 5.3% of the patients. ARE were noted in 12.7%. New hydrocephalus was seen in 8.0% of patients.SRS can be a safe alternative to surgery for selected Koos IV VS in patients ≥ 65 years old. Further follow-up is warranted.

Purpose Surgery is the treatment of choice for large vestibular schwannomas (VS). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been suggested as an alternative to resection in selected patients. However, the safety and efficacy of SRS in Koos grade IV patients ≤45 years old has not been evaluated. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical and radiological outcomes of Koos grade IV in young patient managed with a single-session SRS. Methods This retrospective, multicenter analysis included SRS-treated patients, ≤45 years old presenting with non-life threatening or incapacitating symptoms due to a Koos Grade IV VS and with follow-up ≥ 12 months. Tumor control and neurological outcomes were evaluated. Results 176 patients (median age of 36.0 (IQR 9) and median tumor volume of 9.3 cm3 (IQR 4.7)) were included. The median prescription dose was 12 Gy (IQR 0.5). Median follow-up period was 37.5 (IQR 53.5) months. The 5- and 10-year progression-free survival was 90.9 and 86.7%. Early tumor enlargement occurred in 10.9% of cases and was associated with tumor progression at the last follow-up. The probability of serviceable hearing preservation at 5- and 10-years was 56.8% and 45.2%, respectively. The probability of improvement or preservation of facial nerve function was 95.7% at 5 and 10-years. Adverse radiation effects were noted in 19.9%. New-onset hydrocephalus occurred in 4.0%. Conclusion Single-session SRS is a safe and effective alternative to surgical resection in selected patients ≤45 years old particularly those with medical co-morbidities and those who decline resection. Longer term follow up is warranted.

Intraventricular metastases (IVMs) are uncommon, and their optimal management remains debatable.The aim is to define the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of IVMs.This retrospective, multicenter study included patients managed with SRS for IVMs. SRS-induced adverse events, local tumor or intracranial progression, and the frequency of new-onset hydrocephalus or leptomeningeal spread were documented. Analyses of variables related to patient neuroimaging or clinical outcomes were also performed.The cohort included 160 patients from 11 centers who underwent SRS for treatment of 1045 intracranial metastases, of which 196 were IVMs. The median survival from SRS was 10 months. Of the 154 patients and 190 IVMs with imaging follow-up, 94 patients (61%) experienced distant intracranial disease progression and 16 IVMs (8.4%) progressed locally. The 12- and 24-month local IVM control rates were 91.4% and 86.1%, respectively. Sixteen (10%) and 27 (17.5%) patients developed hydrocephalus and leptomeningeal dissemination post-SRS, respectively. Adverse radiation effects were documented in 24 patients (15%). Eleven patients (6.9%) died because of intracranial disease progression.SRS is an effective treatment option for IVMs, with a local IVM control rate comparable with SRS for parenchymal brain metastases. Leptomeningeal spread and hydrocephalus in patients with IVM occur in a minority of patients, but these patients warrant careful follow-up to detect these changes.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this retrospective, single-institution study was to evaluate radiological and clinical outcomes of patients managed with repeat stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for residual cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM) after prior SRS. METHODS The authors evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of consecutive patients treated with repeat single-session SRS for a residual brain AVM from 1989 to 2021. RESULTS In total, 170 patients underwent repeat SRS for AVM (90 [52.9%] females; median [interquartile range] age at the first SRS procedure 28 [21.5] years; median [interquartile range] age at the second SRS procedure 32 [22.5] years). After repeat SRS, the actuarial 3-, 5-, and 10-year AVM obliteration rates were 37.6%, 57.3%, and 80.9%, respectively. Higher obliteration rates were associated with margin dose ≥ 19 Gy (p = 0.001). After the second SRS procedure, hemorrhage occurred in 8.2% of patients and was lethal in 1 patient. The risk factors of intracranial hemorrhage were age < 18 years (p = 0.03) and residual AVM diameter > 20 mm (p = 0.004). Lower obliteration rates were noted in patients with residual AVM diameter > 20 mm (p = 0.04) and those < 18 years of age (p = 0.04). Asymptomatic, symptomatic, and permanent radiation-induced changes (RICs) after the second SRS procedure occurred in 25.9%, 8.8%, and 5.3% of patients, respectively, and were associated with RIC after the first SRS procedure (p = 0.006). There was 1 case of a radiation-induced meningioma 12 years after SRS. CONCLUSIONS Repeat SRS is a reasonable therapeutic option, in particular for patients with residual AVM. Repeat SRS was associated with more favorable outcomes in adult patients and those with residual AVM smaller than 20 mm in maximum diameter. To increase the rate of residual AVM obliteration, a prescription dose ≥ 19 Gy should ideally be used for repeat SRS.

Surgical removal has been performed as the first line treatment for symptomatic or enlarging hypoglossal schwannomas (HS). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers a minimally invasive approach that may afford long-term tumor control for patients with HS particularly those who refuse or are unfit for surgery. This study evaluates outcomes after SRS performed for both newly diagnosed and residual tumors after incomplete resection.This retrospective, multi-institutional study involved patients treated with adjuvant or primary SRS for HS. The study end-points included local tumor response, clinical outcomes, and procedure-related complications. All the patients had Gamma Knife SRS.The cohort included 12 patients (five females), median age at SRS 49.5 years (range, 37-76)]. The median tumor target volume was 5.9 cmSingle-fraction SRS appears to be a safe and effective upfront and adjuvant treatment option for HS. SRS may be recommended as an alternative to surgery for patients presenting with HS or as an adjuvant treatment following subtotal resection and at HS recurrence.

OBJECTIVE Though stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established safe treatment for small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannomas (VSs), its role in the management of Koos grade IV VS is still unclear. In this retrospective multicenter study, the authors evaluated tumor control and the patient outcomes of primary, single-session SRS treatment for Koos grade IV VS. METHODS This study included patients treated with primary, single-session SRS for Koos grade IV VS at 10 participating centers. Only those patients presenting with non–life-threatening or incapacitating symptoms and at least 12 months of clinical and neuroimaging follow-up were eligible for inclusion. Relevant data were collected, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to perform time-dependent analysis for post-SRS tumor control, hearing preservation, and facial nerve function preservation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for outcome measures using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Six hundred twenty-seven patients (344 females, median patient age 54 [IQR 22] years) treated with primary SRS were included in this study. The median tumor volume was 8.7 (IQR 5) cm3. Before SRS, serviceable hearing, facial nerve weakness (House-Brackmann grade > I), and trigeminal neuropathy were present in 205 (33%), 48 (7.7%), and 203 (32.4%) patients, respectively. The median prescription dose was 12 (IQR 1) Gy. At a median radiological follow-up of 38 (IQR 54) months, tumor control was achieved in 94.1% of patients. Early tumor expansion occurred in 67 (10.7%) patients and was associated with a loss of tumor control at the last follow-up (p = 0.001). Serviceable hearing preservation rates at the 5- and 10-year follow-ups were 65% and 44.6%, respectively. Gardner-Robertson class > 1 (p = 0.003) and cochlear dose ≥ 4 Gy (p = 0.02) were risk factors for hearing loss. Facial nerve function deterioration occurred in 19 (3.0%) patients at the last follow-up and was associated with margin doses ≥ 13 Gy (p = 0.03) and early tumor expansion (p = 0.04). Post-SRS, 33 patients developed hydrocephalus requiring shunting. Adverse radiation effects occurred in 92 patients and were managed medically or surgically in 34 and 18 cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS SRS is a safe and effective method of obtaining tumor control in patients with Koos grade IV VS presenting with non–life-threatening or debilitating symptoms, especially those with surgical comorbidities that contraindicate resection. To decrease the incidence of post-SRS facial palsy, a prescription dose < 13 Gy is recommended.

Meningioma, a type of brain tumor, is a common incidental finding on brain imaging. The best management approach for patients with an incidental meningioma remains unclear. This retrospective multi-center study investigated the outcomes of patients with an incidental meningioma in a frontobasal location, who were managed with active surveillance (n = 28) compared to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (n = 84). Within 5 years of follow-up, SRS improved the radiological control of incidental frontobasal meningiomas (0% vs. 52%), but no symptoms occurred in either group. In the active surveillance cohort, 12% underwent an intervention for tumor growth. The findings of this study provide information to enable shared decision making between clinicians and patients with incidental frontobasal meningiomas. Meningioma is a common incidental finding, and clinical course varies based on anatomical location. The aim of this sub-analysis of the IMPASSE study was to compare the outcomes of patients with an incidental frontobasal meningioma who underwent active surveillance to those who underwent upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Data were retrospectively collected from 14 centres. The active surveillance (n = 28) and SRS (n = 84) cohorts were compared unmatched and matched for age, sex, and duration of follow-up (n = 25 each). The study endpoints included tumor progression, new symptom development, and need for further intervention. Tumor progression occurred in 52.0% and 0% of the matched active surveillance and SRS cohorts, respectively (p < 0.001). Five patients (6.0%) treated with SRS developed treatment related symptoms compared to none in the active monitoring cohort (p = 0.329). No patients in the matched cohorts developed symptoms attributable to treatment. Three patients managed with active surveillance (10.7%, unmatched; 12.0%, matched) underwent an intervention for tumor growth with no persistent side effects after treatment. No patients subject to SRS underwent further treatment. Active monitoring and SRS confer a similarly low risk of symptom development. Upfront treatment with SRS improves imaging-defined tumor control. Active surveillance and SRS are acceptable treatment options for incidental frontobasal meningioma., NA

OBJECTIVE The optimal treatment for recurrent and residual gangliogliomas remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of patients with recurrent or residual intracranial ganglioglioma. METHODS This retrospective multicenter study involved patients managed with SRS for ganglioglioma. The study endpoints included local tumor control and tumor- or SRS-related neurological morbidity following treatment. Factors associated with tumor progression and neurological morbidity were also analyzed. RESULTS The cohort included 20 patients (11 males [55%]) with a median age of 24.5 (IQR 14) years who had been managed with SRS for ganglioglioma. Five-year radiological progression-free survival was 85.6%. After SRS, 2 patients (10%) experienced transient neurological deterioration. At a median clinical follow-up of 88.5 (IQR 112.5) months, 1 patient (5%) experienced seizure worsening and 1 (5%) required further resection of the tumor because of radiological progression. No mortality was noted in this series. CONCLUSIONS SRS appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for surgically inaccessible, recurrent, and residual gangliogliomas. In this series, the 5-year progression-free survival rate after SRS was 85.6%. Gross-total resection remains the primary treatment of choice for patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent ganglioglioma. SRS may be considered for patients unfit for surgery and those with surgically inaccessible newly diagnosed, residual, and recurrent lesions.

OBJECTIVE The object of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of intracranial chordomas. METHODS This retrospective multicenter study involved consecutive patients managed with single-session SRS for an intracranial chordoma at 10 participating centers. Radiological and neurological outcomes were assessed after SRS, and predictive factors were evaluated via statistical methodology. RESULTS A total of 93 patients (56 males [60.2%], mean age 44.8 years [SD 16.6]) underwent single-session SRS for intracranial chordoma. SRS was utilized as adjuvant treatment in 77 (82.8%) cases, at recurrence in 13 (14.0%) cases, and as primary treatment in 3 (3.2%) cases. The mean tumor volume was 8 cm3 (SD 7.3), and the mean prescription volume was 9.1 cm3 (SD 8.7). The mean margin and maximum radiosurgical doses utilized were 17 Gy (SD 3.6) and 34.2 Gy (SD 6.4), respectively. On multivariate analysis, treatment failure due to tumor progression (p = 0.001) was associated with an increased risk for post-SRS neurological deterioration, and a maximum dose > 29 Gy (p = 0.006) was associated with a decreased risk. A maximum dose > 29 Gy was also associated with improved local tumor control (p = 0.02), whereas the presence of neurological deficits prior to SRS (p = 0.04) and an age > 65 years at SRS (p = 0.03) were associated with worse local tumor control. The 5- and 10-year tumor progression-free survival rates were 54.7% and 34.7%, respectively. An age > 65 years at SRS (p = 0.01) was associated with decreased overall survival. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 83% and 70%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS SRS appears to be a safe and relatively effective adjuvant management option for intracranial chordomas. The best outcomes were obtained in younger patients without significant neurological deficits. Further well-designed studies are necessary to define the best timing for the use of SRS in the multidisciplinary management of intracranial chordomas.

Background The initial management of asymptomatic, incidentally discovered, cavernous sinus (CS) meningiomas remains incompletely defined. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients presenting with an asymptomatic CS meningioma. Methods This is an international, retrospective study included patients treated with upfront SRS for an asymptomatic CS meningioma. Local tumor control, tumor and SRS-related complications, and the development of new neurologic deficits after SRS were evaluated. Results A total of 37 patients [29 males; mean age 55.05 years (SD±11.56)] treated with upfront SRS for an asymptomatic, CS meningioma were included in the study. The mean margin dose was 12.27 (SD±2.3) Gy. The median clinical and radiological follow-up periods were 66 (IQR 84) and 72 months (IQR 84), respectively. At the last follow-up, tumor regression and stability were noted in 19 (51.35%) and 18 (48.65%) of CS meningiomas, respectively. SRS-related complications occurred in 2 patients (5.4 %) and were managed conservatively. Conclusions Upfront SRS is a safe and effective treatment option for asymptomatic CS meningiomas. SRS may be considered at the time of initial diagnosis of a CS meningioma. If observation is the initial management chosen, SRS should be recommended when CS meningioma growth is documented on follow-up imaging.

The optimal management of asymptomatic, petroclival meningiomas remains incompletely defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with asymptomatic, petroclival region meningiomas. This retrospective, international, multicenter study involved patients treated with SRS for an asymptomatic, petroclival region meningioma. Study endpoints included local tumor control rate, procedural complications, and the emergence of new neurological deficits. There were 72 patients (22 males, mean age 59.53 years (SD ± 11.9)) with an asymptomatic meningioma located in the petroclival region who were treated with upfront SRS. Mean margin dose and maximum dose were 13.26 (SD ± 2.72) Gy and 26.14 (SD ± 6.75) Gy respectively. Median radiological and clinical follow-up periods post-SRS were 52.5 (IQR 61.75) and 47.5 months (IQR 69.75) respectively. At last follow-up, tumor control was achieved in all patients. SRS-related complications occurred in 6 (8.33%) patients, with 3 of them (4.17%) exhibiting new neurological deficits. Upfront SRS for asymptomatic, petroclival region meningiomas affords excellent local tumor control and does so with a relatively low risk of SRS-related complications. SRS can be considered at diagnosis of an asymptomatic petroclival region meningioma. If active surveillance is initially chosen, SRS should be recommended when growth is noted during radiological follow-up.

Background Intra-thecal baclofen pump has been proven a safe and effective treatment of spasticity. Subdural hematoma has been rarely described following intra-thecal drug delivery device insertion. Case presentation We report on the rare case of a 45-year-old male with multiple sclerosis who presented with symptoms of intra-cranial hypotension 1 month after insertion of an intra-thecal baclofen pump for severe spasticity. Non-contrast head computerized tomography scan revealed bilateral, sub-acute, subdural hematomas. Due to the nature of the patient’s symptoms suggesting intra-cranial hypotension, surgical repair of the cerebrospinal fluid leak only was initially performed. However, after an initial improvement, the patient experienced increasing in severity headache and worsening tetraparesis. Subsequently, the patient underwent burr hole evacuation of the subdural hematomas with improvement of his symptoms. On the 6-week follow-up, he reported no headache and he was able to walk with assistance. Conclusion Subdural hematomas should be considered in all patients presenting with new neurologic deficits or persistent headache following intra-thecal drug delivery device insertion. Early recognition and appropriate management of this rare but potentially life-threatening complication is of great importance to improve prognosis and patient outcomes.

ObjectiveAcute ischemic stroke and silent cerebral infarctions following pipeline embolization device (PED) treatment of intracranial aneurysms have been estimated to occur in 3–6% and in 50.9–90% of patients respectively. The PED with Shield technology (PED-Shield) incorporates a surface phosphorylcholine polymer to reduce the thrombogenicity of the implant. We sought to determine the incidence of diffusion weighted image (DWI) documented cerebral ischemia after PED-Shield treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.MethodsThis prospective study involved a single center series of consecutive patients treated for an unruptured intracranial aneurysm with the PED-Shield. All participants underwent clinical evaluation on admission, after the procedure, at discharge, and 30 days following treatment. Brain MRI was obtained within 72 hours of the procedure. Ischemic lesions identified on DWI sequences where examined as to their number, size, and location in relation to the procedure.ResultsOver 12 months, 33 patients harboring 38 intracranial aneurysms were treated with the PED-Shield in 36 procedures. Neither mortality nor clinically evident ischemic events were noted in the 30 day postprocedural period. DWI documented, silent cerebral ischemia occurred in six patients (18.18%) after six procedures (16.66%). No statistically significant risk factors for postprocedural silent cerebral ischemia were identified.ConclusionWe demonstrated a reduced rate of silent cerebral infarcts following PED-Shield treatment of intracranial aneurysms than previously reported with other endovascular treatment modalities and with the previous device generations. Further research is necessary to evaluate our results and to identify methods to reduce the incidence of postprocedural cerebral ischemic events.