Search

Objective We administered pyrazinamide (PZA) and probenecid (PB) — two well-known modulators of urate transport via the proximal tubules — to evaluate their impact on urate transport through the peritoneal membrane and to clarify mechanisms affecting peritoneal transport. Setting A continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) unit in 2nd Hospital of IKA (Social Services Institute), Greece. Patients In 20 stable CAPD patients, on the study day, a 4-hour, 2-L, 1.36% glucose exchange was performed (control exchange). Pyrazinamide 3 g was given orally and another identical exchange was performed (study exchange). The same protocol was repeated with 2 g PB. Kt/V, peritoneal clearances of urea, creatinine, and urate for each exchange, and mass transfer area coefficients (MTAC) for the three solutes and their dialysate-to-plasma concentration (D/P) ratios were used to estimate peritoneal transport. Results Administration of PZA resulted in decreased clearances and MTAC values for the three solutes. The D/P ratio decreased significantly only for urate, indicating a more intense influence of PZA on urate. After PB administration, clearances of urea, creatinine, and urate were increased. MTAC and D/P ratio increased significantly only for urate ( p < 0.05), demonstrating an action similar to that exerted on renal tubules. Conclusions These findings provide evidence that unrestricted diffusion is not the only transport mechanism in the case of urate, and demonstrate the existence of an active mechanism in peritoneal urate transport with a reabsorptive and, probably, a secretive component that resembles that of renal tubule urate transport. Attention should be given in the case of CAPD patients undergoing antituberculous (PZA) treatment: it might have a negative impact on urea, creatinine, and urate peritoneal transport rates.

We studied 14 patients (11 women and 3 men) from 18 to 33 years old, suffering from type I diabetes mellitus with normal renal function (creatinine clearance 106.91 +/- 28.73 ml/min) and serum uric acid below 2.5 mg/dl (2.34 +/- 0.11 mg/dl) as well as a high uric acid clearance (23.04 +/- 5.92 ml/min) and fractional urate excretion (21.4 +/- 2.6) versus urate clearance 9.82 ml/min and fractional urate excretion 8.80 +/- 1.3 in 14 normal control subjects. The study of the uricosuric mechanisms was conducted by the combination of probenecid (PB) test which inhibits the reabsorption of secreted urate, and pyrazinamide (PZA) test, which inhibits its tubular secretion. The results of studies indicate that the increase in urate clearance was accounted for by increased PZA-nonsuppressible urate suggesting a decreased reabsorption of filtered urate. Increased PZA-suppressible urate excretion combined with impaired response to a uricosuric drug is consistent with impaired reabsorption of secreted urate. According to our findings, increased urate excretion in diabetic patients may be attributed to the inhibition of both filtered and secreted reabsorption. This reabsorptive tubular abnormality is consistent with the view of an interference of tubular reabsorption of glucose with the tubular capacity for uric acid reabsorption.

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) might affect urate homeostasis and clearance. Renal tubular urate transport was studied by means of probenecid (PB) and pyrazinamide (PZA) tests in individuals with ADPKD and normal renal function as well as various degrees of renal failure (49 patients). Comparisons were made between polycystic and chronic glomerulonephritic kidney (CGNK), as well as with controls (men with normal renal function). Patients with ADPKD and normal renal function showed plasma urate levels within normal range and normal renal urate handling. In contrast higher plasma urate levels comparing to controls were found in patients with CGNK and normal renal function. During the evolution of renal failure ADPKD patients showed lower urate plasma levels and higher renal clearance as well as, fractional urate excretion, comparing to CGNK patients with the same degree of renal failure. In conclusion patients with ADPKD and normal renal function have normal urate handling and plasma urate levels within normal range. With increasing severity of disease and during evolution of renal failure CGNK patients showed higher urate plasma levels and lower clearances comparing to ADPKD patients. When renal disease becomes more advanced there was no difference in renal urate handling between ADPKD and CGNK patients.

Rhabdomyolysis and acute tubular necrosis (ATN) are described in a patient with pyloric stenosis in whom severe hypokalemia developed due to repetitive vomiting. Furthermore, the importance of hypokalemia in the development of acute renal failure is emphasized.

To the Editor. —In the April 1980Archives(140;531-533), Fang et al underlined the low fractional excretion of sodium (FE Na ) values that they found in all 12 cases of contrast media-induced acute renal failure; they said this finding is characteristic of contrast media-induced acute renal failure. We would like to juxtapose our findings in an already presented prospective study. 1 In this study, we found that in five of seven cases of acute renal failure caused by contrast media, the FE Na values fluctuated definitely above 1. In fact, in two of our patients, the FE Na values were 6.89 and 6.95, respectively. The two patients with FE Na values below 1 had less serious clinical features. The biochemical disturbances, on the other hand, lasted for only 24 hours. The only oliguric patient belonged to the group with high FE Na values, while all the rest of the patients