Search

Current guidelines recommend endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) for Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with dysplasia and intramucosal adenocarcinoma using either radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy (LNSC). The aims of this multicenter study are to compare the rate and number of treatment sessions of RFA vs. LNSC to achieve CE-D and CE-IM and assess outcomes for those who switched therapy. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with BE undergoing EET. Demographics, baseline variables, endoscopy details, and histology information were abstracted. One hundred and sixty-two patients were included in this study with 100 patients in the RFA group and 62 patients in the LNSC group. The rate of CE-D and CE-IM did not differ between the RFA group and LNSC group (81% vs. 71.0%, p = 0.14) and (64% vs. 66%, p = 0.78), respectively. The number of sessions to achieve CE-D and CE-IM was higher with LNSC compared to RFA (4.2 vs. 3.2, p = 0.05) and (4.8 vs. 3.5, p = 0.04), respectively. The likelihood of developing recurrent dysplasia was higher among patients who did not achieve CE-IM (12%) compared to those who did achieve CE-IM (4%), p = 0.04. Similar findings were found in those who switched treatment modalities. EET is highly effective in eradication of Barrett’s associated dysplasia and neoplasia. Both RFA and LNSC achieved similar rates of CE-D and CE-IM although LNSC required more sessions. Also, achievement of CE-IM was associated with less recurrence rates of dysplasia.

BackgroundIntravenous erythromycin prior to endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) improves outcomes but requires immediate preparation delaying administration in emergency cases. Azithromycin is readily available and does not require prolonged preparation. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of azithromycin in improving the quality of endoscopic visualization in upper GIB compared to erythromycin.MethodsPatients admitted with upper GIB who received erythromycin or azithromycin before urgent endoscopy were included. Primary outcome of the quality of visualization was assessed by two gastroenterologists, blinded to the choice of infusion, using a scoring system ranging from 0 to 8, with a maximum of 2 points assigned to the fundus, body, antrum and bulb.ResultsSixty-six patients were included; 25 received azithromycin and 41 received erythromycin. Mean total visualization score was significantly higher with azithromycin compared to that with erythromycin (6.8±1.4 vs. 5.5±2.2, respectively; P=0.01) and remained significant after adjusting for confounders (Diff: 0.01, 1.88; P=0.05). Secondary outcomes analyses showed a shorter LOS when given azithromycin compared to erythromycin [6 (3 to 9) vs. 8 (7 to 16) days, respectively, 95% CI: 1.03, 3.89; P=0.04]. Time between initiating the infusion and endoscopy was longer with azithromycin (Diff: 40.64 min; 95% CI: 7.23, 74.05; P=0.02). Need for second look endoscopy, procedure time, blood transfusion requirements and procedure-related complications did not differ between the groups.ConclusionsAzithromycin infusion before endoscopy for upper GIB was associated with better visualization than that of erythromycin. Randomized trials are needed to validate these findings.

Deglutition syncope is a rare, neurally mediated reflex syncope associated with swallowing. It is typically associated with pharyngoesophageal disorders with secondary abnormal vagal reflex causing atrioventricular cardiac block and cerebral hypoperfusion. Diagnosis can be delayed and challenging. Various treatment options have been reported, including withholding cardiac blocker agents, diet modifications, and pacemaker placement. We present a case of persistent deglutition syncope secondary to esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction that failed medical therapy and was managed successfully with peroral endoscopic myotomy with excellent long-term outcome.

Current guidelines recommend endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) for Barrett's esophagus (BE) with dysplasia and intramucosal adenocarcinoma using either radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy (LNSC). The aims of this multicenter study are to compare the rate and number of treatment sessions of RFA vs. LNSC to achieve CE-D and CE-IM and assess outcomes for those who switched therapy.This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with BE undergoing EET. Demographics, baseline variables, endoscopy details, and histology information were abstracted.One hundred and sixty-two patients were included in this study with 100 patients in the RFA group and 62 patients in the LNSC group. The rate of CE-D and CE-IM did not differ between the RFA group and LNSC group (81% vs. 71.0%, p = 0.14) and (64% vs. 66%, p = 0.78), respectively. The number of sessions to achieve CE-D and CE-IM was higher with LNSC compared to RFA (4.2 vs. 3.2, p = 0.05) and (4.8 vs. 3.5, p = 0.04), respectively. The likelihood of developing recurrent dysplasia was higher among patients who did not achieve CE-IM (12%) compared to those who did achieve CE-IM (4%), p = 0.04. Similar findings were found in those who switched treatment modalities.EET is highly effective in eradication of Barrett's associated dysplasia and neoplasia. Both RFA and LNSC achieved similar rates of CE-D and CE-IM although LNSC required more sessions. Also, achievement of CE-IM was associated with less recurrence rates of dysplasia.

Two common endoscopic therapies for eradication of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus are radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy (LNC). There is no data comparing postprocedural pain. This study aimed to compare the incidence of postprocedural pain between the 2 ablation modalities.This is a multicenter prospective study in which pain intensity scores and the presence of dysphagia were assessed immediately before and after treatment, 48 hours posttreatment and at 3 weeks posttreatment using validated instruments.Of 94 patients, 35 underwent LNC and 59 underwent RFA [36 with focal radiofrequency ablation (RFA-F) and 23 with circumferential radiofrequency ablation (RFA-C)]. Immediately posttreatment, patients in the LNC group reported an average Numeric Pain Scale score that was lower than in the RFA groups [LNC 0.41 vs. RFA-F 1.18 (P=0.026), LNC 0.41 vs. RFA-C 1.38 (P=0.010)]. These differences persisted at 48 hours posttreatment [LNC 0.76 vs. RFA-F 1.77 (P=0.013), LNC 0.76 vs. RFA-C 1.73 (P=0.018)]. The odds of pain after RFA were at least 5 times greater than after LNC [immediately posttreatment odds ratio, 5.26 (95% confidence interval, 1.85-14.29) and 48 h posttreatment odds ratio, 5.56 (95% confidence interval, 2.27-14.29)]. There was no difference in dysphagia after treatment in either group, at any time point (P=0.429).LNC was associated with less postprocedural pain when compared with RFA. These results help inform patients and physicians about the expected symptoms after ablative endotherapy.

Gastric varices (GV) have higher rates of morbidity and mortality from hemorrhage than esophageal varices. Several studies have shown the safety and efficacy of cyanoacrylate (CA) injection for acute gastric variceal hemorrhage. We report data from our experience with CA injection for GV before and after routine use of post-injection audible Doppler assessment (ADA) for GV obturation and describe long-term outcomes after this therapy. We retrospectively identified patients who had documented GV, underwent CA injection, and had at least 2 weeks of follow-up. We recorded and analyzed the survival and rebleeding rates with patient demographics, clinical data, and endoscopy findings between two groups of patients who were categorized by CA injection prior to and after inception of the ADA technique. Seventy-one patients were identified with 16 patients analyzed in a group where ADA was not used (Pre-ADA) and 55 analyzed where ADA was used (Post-ADA). No rebleeding events were observed within 1 week of initial CA injection. No embolic events were reported after any initial CA injection within 4 weeks. The rate of bleed-free survival at 1 year was 69.6% in the Pre-ADA group and 85.8% in the Post-ADA without statistical significance. The all-cause 1-year mortality was 13.8% in the Pre-ADA group and 10.7% in the Post-ADA group without statistical significance. ADA of CA-injected GV does not appear to significantly affect adverse events or clinical outcomes; however, our findings are limited by small sample size and cohort proportions allowing for significant type II statistical error. Further prospective investigation is required to determine the impact of ADA on clinical outcomes after GV obturation.

Introduction of the full-thickness resection device (FTRD) has allowed endoscopic resection of difficult lesions such as those with deep wall origin/infiltration or those located in difficult anatomic locations. The aim of this study is to assess the outcomes of the FTRD among its early users in the USA. Patients who underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) for lower gastrointestinal tract lesions using the FTRD at 26 US tertiary care centers between 10/2017 and 12/2018 were included. Primary outcome was R0 resection rate. Secondary outcomes included rate of technical success (en bloc resection), achievement of histologic full-thickness resection (FTR), and adverse events (AE). A total of 95 patients (mean age 65.5 ± 12.6 year, 38.9% F) were included. The most common indication, for use of FTRD, was resection of difficult adenomas (non-lifting, recurrent, residual, or involving appendiceal orifice/diverticular opening) (66.3%), followed by adenocarcinomas (22.1%), and subepithelial tumors (SET) (11.6%). Lesions were located in the proximal colon (61.1%), distal colon (18.9%), or rectum (20%). Mean lesion diameter was 15.5 ± 6.4 mm and 61.1% had a prior resection attempt. The mean total procedure time was 59.7 ± 31.8 min. R0 resection was achieved in 82.7% while technical success was achieved in 84.2%. Histologically FTR was demonstrated in 88.1% of patients. There were five clinical AE (5.3%) with 2 (2.1%) requiring surgical intervention. Results from this first US multicenter study suggest that EFTR with the FTRD is a technically feasible, safe, and effective technique for resecting difficult colonic lesions.

A 69-year-old Trinidadian woman with a past medical history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) presented with a 2-week history of dysphagia. Physical examination did not reveal any cutaneous or mucocutaneous lesions. Neurological exam also was normal. There were no laboratory abnormalities. A CT scan showed circumferential wall thickening and moderate patulous proximal oesophagus without any distal oesophageal findings or abnormal findings in the chest or abdomen. A barium oesophagram revealed severe oesophageal dysmotility and GERD. Given the dysphagia and CT findings, an oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was performed. The EGD revealed pigmented mucosa in the lower third …

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a rare disease of the esophagus that is characterized by eosinophilic infiltrate within the esophageal mucosa resulting in chronic inflammation and stenosis. It typically presents with symptoms of esophageal dysfunction with dysphagia and food impaction being the most common presenting complaints. Herein we describe a rare case presentation of a young patient with spontaneous esophageal perforation in the setting of undiagnosed EoE. We suggest that the placement of a covered esophageal stent can provide full closure of the perforation and restoration of the integrity of the GI tract without the need for more invasive open repair. The patient had a short recovery time with no reported postoperative complications upon 30 months follow up. We believe that it’s important to consider and rule out EoE in patients with a history of dysphagia and esophageal perforation.

219 Background: Patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer can have progressive dysphagia and associated worsening quality of life (QOL). Maintenance of esophageal patency by reducing intraluminal tumor burden can improve QOL by palliating dysphagia and delay or prevent the need for feeding tubes and esophageal stents. We aimed to assess the effect of endoscopic palliative cryoablation with trūFreeze Spray Cryotherapy (SCT) on dysphagia burden, QOL, and survival in patients with esophageal cancer. Methods: This is a multi-center prospective study of esophageal cancer patients at 10 sites in the United States. Subjects are 18-89 years old with luminal esophageal cancer, non-surgical candidates, not receiving systemic therapy, without esophageal stents, or history of prior SCT for esophageal cancer. SCT is an endoluminal ablation modality using non-contact medical grade liquid nitrogen (LN2) reaching a temperature of -1960 C delivered by a catheter. SCT was performed at 6 week intervals or as clinically indicated at a dose of 2x30 or 3x30 seconds per every 2-3 cm treatment site. Dysphagia and QOL were assessed with the 5-point Dysphagia score and EORTC QLQ 30 and OES18 esophageal module. Results: Of 49 subjects, mean age is 74.2 ± 11.8, 88% are men, 92% have esophageal adenocarcinoma and 19% have prior esophageal surgery or esophagectomy. 75% had a history of chemotherapy and/or radiation, and 58% (n=21) had a tumor stage >2. Subjects had a total of 258 treatment sessions over a mean follow-up of 329.7 ± 219.1 days, and received a median of 4 (IQR:2-7) SCT sessions with an average dose of 90 (3x30 sec) seconds/treatment site. There were 19 procedure related adverse events (20.4% of patients and 7.4% of procedures), all of which were mild (n=13) or moderate (n=6) in severity. Mean baseline dysphagia score was 1.7 ± 0.9 and 89% maintained (72%) or improved (17%) their baseline dysphagia score after initial SCT, p

Background: Intravenous erythromycin prior to endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) improves outcomes but requires immediate preparation delaying administration in emergency cases. Azithromycin is readily available and does not require prolonged preparation. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of azithromycin in improving the quality of endoscopic visualization in upper GIB compared to erythromycin. Methods: Patients admitted with upper GIB who received erythromycin or azithromycin before urgent endoscopy were included. Primary outcome of the quality of visualization was assessed by two gastroenterologists, blinded to the choice of infusion, using a scoring system ranging from 0 to 8, with a maximum of 2 points assigned to the fundus, body, antrum and bulb. Results: Sixty-six patients were included; 25 received azithromycin and 41 received erythromycin. Mean total visualization score was significantly higher with azithromycin compared to that with erythromycin (6.8 ± 1.4 vs 5.5 ± 2.2, respectively; P=0.01) and remained significant after adjusting for confounders (Diff: 0.01, 1.88; P=0.05). Secondary outcomes analyses showed a shorter LOS when given azithromycin compared to erythromycin {6 (3-9) vs 8 (7-16) days, respectively, CI: 1.03, 3.89; P = 0.04}. Time between initiating the infusion and endoscopy was longer with azithromycin (Diff = 40.64 min; 95% CI: 7.23, 74.05; P=0.02). Need for second look endoscopy, procedure time, blood transfusion requirements and procedure-related complications did not differ between the groups. Conclusions: Azithromycin infusion before endoscopy for upper GIB was associated with better visualization than that of erythromycin. Randomized trials are needed to validate these findings. Funding: None. Declaration of Interest: All authors report no conflict of interest in relation to this study. Ethical Approval: The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Virginia Commonwealth University.

The use of performance-enhancing drugs has increased dramatically in the last decade with high prevalence reported among the young athlete population. Many of these drugs contain anabolic steroids and may carry potential significant side effects and health risks. We report a case of anabolic steroid-induced acute pancreatitis (AP) that recurred after the reuse of the same drug by the patient, confirming the causative relationship.A 24 year-old male presented with severe epigastric pain. His past medical history was significant for two hospitalizations during the last year with AP. During his hospital admissions, extensive workup was performed ruling out the common and uncommon causes of AP. Upon further pressing, the patient admitted to a history of past and current anabolic steroid use for athletic performance enhancement. He began this use four years ago and most recently started using trenbolone acetate (TA). The correlation between the timing of the anabolic steroids administration and the attacks of AP, along with ruling out other causes, confirmed TA as the cause of pancreatitis.The side effects associated with the use of these increasingly prevalent drugs are difficult to study in clinical trials due to the unethical nature of their consumption. In addition, these medications are difficult to study due to the varied usage cycles and patterns, unknown origin and source, as well as often high dose ingestion. Physicians and body builders need to be aware of the possible serious consequences of their use.

400 Background: Progressive dysphagia in locally advanced esophageal cancer worsens quality of life (QOL). Endoscopic cryoablation may effectively palliate dysphagia. Aim: To study the effect of palliative cryoablation with trūFreeze Spray Cryotherapy (SCT) in patients with esophageal cancer. Methods: This is an interim analysis of a multi-center prospective study of esophageal cancer patients who are non-surgical candidates, not on active systemic therapy, without esophageal stents, or prior SCT. SCT is an endoscopic ablation modality using liquid nitrogen (LN2) delivered by catheter. SCT occurred at 6 week intervals or as indicated at a dose of 2x30 or 3x30 secs/treatment site. Dysphagia and esophageal symptoms were assessed at baseline and after treatment with a 5-point Dysphagia score and the EORTC-QLQ-OES18 (higher score = more symptoms). Results: 39 subjects (mean age 74.4 ±12.2; 87% men, Table) had 182 treatment sessions over a mean follow-up of 206.9 days, and received a median 3 SCT sessions with an average dose of 90 (3x30) secs/site. There was 1 procedure related SAE (2.6% of patients and 0.5% procedures). Mean follow-up dysphagia score was 1.6 ±0.8 and 90% had same or improved dysphagia score after SCT treatment, p6 month follow-up. Clinical trial information: NCT03243734. [Table: see text]

Ventricular assist device implantation is associated with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB); however, outcomes in terms of initial and repeat GIB risk, severity, location of lesions, and endoscopic interventions need to be better defined. Consecutive patients from a database of adult patients with ventricular assist devices (VADs) implanted between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2010, at a single center were reviewed and followed through May 31, 2011, in a retrospective manner. The GIB events were further classified by severity, lesion location, and lesion type. Hazard analysis models were calculated for the time to GIB events. Of 166 patients with a VAD, 38 patients experienced 84 GIB events. Seventeen patients experienced ≥2 GIB events. Maximal hazard for the first bleeding event was 2.23 events/patient-year at 21 days and declined to the constant hazard by 71 days postimplantation. The hazard for recurrent GIB was greatest immediately after the first GIB event. When considering all GIB events, most lesions (68%) were located in the proximal bowel. Angiodysplasia was the most common lesion type (17.5%) seen on endoscopy when all GIB events were considered, whereas ulcers were the most common type (13.8%) seen in initial GIB events. The actuarial risk of initial GIB events peaks in the first 3 months after VAD implantation followed by a stable lower risk of bleeding. The hazard for recurrent GIB events is substantially increased immediately after the initial GIB.