Search

PurposeAdvances in radiotherapy have improved tumor control and reduced toxicity in the management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Local failure remains a problem for some patients with advanced primary tumors, and toxicities are significant given the large treatment volume and tumor proximity to critical structures, even with modern photon-based radiotherapy. Proton therapy has unique dosimetric advantages, and recent technological advances now allow delivery of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), which can potentially improve the therapeutic ratio in NPC. We report our 2-year clinical outcomes with IMPT for NPC.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed treatment records of patients with NPC treated with IMPT at our center. Demographics, dosimetry, tumor response, local regional control (LRC), distant metastasis, overall survival, and acute and late toxicity outcomes were reviewed. Analyses were performed with descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicity was graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0).ResultsTwenty-six patients were treated from 2015 to 2020. Median age was 48 years (range, 19–73 years), 62% (n = 16) had T3-T4 disease, 92% (n = 24) were node positive, 92% (n = 24) had stage III-IV disease, and 69% (n = 18) had positive results for Epstein-Barr virus. Dose-painted pencil-beam IMPT was used. Most patients (85%; 22 of 26) were treated with 70 Gy(RBE) in 33 fractions once daily; 4 (15%) underwent hyperfractionated accelerated treatment twice daily. All received concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy; 7 (27%) also received induction chemotherapy. All patients (100%) completed the planned radiotherapy, and no acute or late grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed. At median follow-up of 25 months (range, 4-60), there were 2 local regional failures (8%) and 3 distant metastases (12%). The Kaplan-Meier 2-year LRC, freedom from distant metastasis, and overall survival were 92%, 87%, and 85% respectively.ConclusionIMPT is feasible in locally advanced NPC with early outcomes demonstrating excellent LRC and favorable toxicity profile. Our data add to the growing body of evidence supporting the clinical use of IMPT for NPC.

Objectives/hypothesis Our primary objective was to compare differences in survival of patients with high-grade salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) receiving adjuvant neutron versus photon radiotherapy using a hospital-based national cohort and restricted mean survival time (RMST) analysis. Our secondary objective was to compare survival of similar patients treated with primary neutron versus photon radiation. Study design Multicenter, retrospective population-based study of patients within the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2014. Methods One thousand eight hundred forty-four patients were selected on diagnosis of high-grade parotid and submandibular malignancies. One thousand seven hundred seventy-seven patients receiving photon and 67 patients receiving neutron therapy were identified who met inclusion criteria. Patients were then categorized as having primary surgery with adjuvant radiation or primary radiation without prior surgery. Bivariate analysis was performed to assess for differences between groups, and RMST analysis was performed at 1-, 2-, and 5-year timepoints with controlling for available covariate data. Results There was no significant difference in RMST for patients receiving neutrons over photons at 1, 2, and 5 years in the adjuvant setting. Among patients undergoing primary radiotherapy, there was a difference in RMST of 2.29 months at 1 year and 5.05 months at 2 years for neutrons over photons, though this benefit was not observed at 5 years post-therapy. Conclusions For patients with high grade SGCs undergoing adjuvant photon versus neutron radiotherapy, there was no difference in RMST. There was observed to be a significant difference in RMST at 1 and 2 years among patients undergoing primary neutron therapy of up to 5 months. Given the benefit observed with primary neutron therapy, it should be considered in both the primary and adjuvant treatment setting. Level of evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 131:541-547, 2021.

Background: Primary adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is the second most common primary tracheal neoplasms but the data for optimal treatment plan is limited. This study is an update of our institutional experience treating primary ACC of the trachea with neutron radiotherapy.

Highlights • Data comparing PROs with pencil beam and passive scattering are lacking. • We performed a comparison of EPIC domain scores for prostate cancer patients. • Results were sensitive to the methods used to compare PROs. • Future studies are needed to prospectively compare PROs following protons., Background Although pencil beam scanning (PBS) is the most conformal method for proton beam therapy (PBT) delivery, it is unknown if outcomes differ compared to treatment with passive scatter/uniform scanning (PS/US). This analysis compares patient reported outcomes (PRO) changes following PBS and PS/US for prostate cancer (PC) in a prospective multicenter registry study. Methods We evaluated PROs with the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) instrument for men with localized PC enrolled in PCG 001-09 (NCT01255748). PROs were assessed at baseline and through 12 months of follow-up. We compared mean changes in EPIC scores, as well as the proportions of men experiencing a one- and two-fold minimally important difference (MID) in domain scores, between PBS and PS/US. Multivariate analyses (MVAs) were performed to further evaluate the association between proton modality and PRO changes. Results Three-hundred-and-four men completed EPIC at baseline; 72 received PBS and 232 received PS/US. The average quality-of-life (QOL) declines from baseline through 12 months did not significantly differ between the two groups. The proportion of men reporting a 1-MID decline at 12 months for PBS and PS/US was 34.3% and 27.4%, respectively, for urinary QOL (P = 0.27); 40. 1% and 40.9% for bowel QOL (P = 0.36); and 30. 1% and 36.6% for sexual QOL (P = 0.94). Corresponding 2-MID declines for PBS and PS/US were observed in 26.9% and 13.2% of men for urinary QOL (P = 0.01), 35.3% and 29.1% for bowel QOL (P = 0.33); and 16.4% and 18.1% for sexual QOL (P = 0.76). The association between proton modality and 2-MID changes in urinary QOL at 12-months remained significant on MVA (P = 0.007). Conclusions The results of this analysis show differences between PBS and PS/US with regards to two-fold MID changes in urinary function at 12 months, but no differences for average score declines over time. Future studies evaluating PRO measures between the two PBT modalities are warranted.

Purpose: For most disease sites, level 1 evidence is lacking for proton beam therapy (PBT). By identifying target populations that would benefit most from PBT, prospective registries could overcome many of the challenges in clinical trial enrollment. Herein, we report clinical outcomes of patients treated with PBT for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Methods and Materials: Data were obtained from the multi-institutional prospective database of the Proton Collaborative Group (PCG). Inclusion criteria of our study were stage III de novo or recurrent LA-NSCLC, use of PBT, and availability of follow-up data. Overall survival (OS) time was calculated from the start of treatment until death or last follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for groups of interest and compared with log-rank tests. Cox regression modeling was used to evaluate the multivariate association between selected covariates and OS. Results: A total of 195 patients were included in the analysis. PBT was given with a median equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) of 63.8 Gy (relative biological effectiveness). Pencil beam scanning was used in 20% of treatments. Treatment-related grade 3 adverse events were rare: 1 pneumonitis, 2 dermatitis, and 3 esophagitis. No grade 4 events were reported. Two cardiac-related grade 5 events occurred in patients with multiple risk factors. The median follow-up time for living patients was 37.1 months and the median OS was 19.0 months. On multivariate analysis, good performance status (hazard ratio, 0.27; [95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.46]; P < .0001), pencil beam scanning use (0.55; [0.31-0.97]; P = .04), and increased EQD2 (0.80; [0.71-0.90] - per 10 Gy increase; P = .0002) were associated with decreased mortality. Conclusions: PBT appears to yield low rates of adverse events with an OS similar to other retrospective studies on PBT for LA-NSCLC. PBS use and increased EQD2 can potentially improve OS.

Introduction: Proton beam therapy (PBT) reduces normal organ dose compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with major salivary gland tumors. It is not known whether thi...

Purpose: To report the outcomes of sinonasal tumors treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) on the Proton Collaborative Group registry study. Methods and Materials: Sixty-nine patients with sinonasal tumors underwent curative intent PBT between 2010 and 2016. Patients who received de novo irradiation (42 patients) were analyzed separately from those who received reirradiation (27 patients) (re-RT). Median age was 53.1 years (range, 15.7-82.1; de novo) and 57.4 years (range, 31.3-88.0; re-RT). The most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma in both groups. Median PBT dose was 58.5 Gy (RBE) (range, 12-78.3; de novo) and 60.0 Gy (RBE) (range 18.2-72.3; re-RT), and median dose per fraction was 2.0 Gy (RBE) for both cohorts. Survival estimates for patients who received de novo irradiation and those who received re-RT were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Median follow-up for surviving patients was 26.4 months (range, 3.5-220.5). The 3-year overall survival (OS), freedom from distant metastasis, freedom from disease progression, and freedom from locoregional recurrence (FFLR) for de novo irradiation were 100%, 84.0%, 77.3%, and 92.9%, respectively. With re-RT, the 3-year OS, freedom from distant metastasis, FFDP, and FFLR were 76.2%, 47.4%, 32.1%, and 33.8%, respectively. In addition, 12 patients (17.4%) experienced recurrent disease. Re-RT was associated with inferior FFLR (P = .04). On univariate analysis, squamous cell carcinoma was associated with inferior OS (P

Purpose: Pencil beam (PB) analytical algorithms have been the standard of care for proton therapy dose calculations. The introduction of Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms may provide more robust and accurate planning and can improve therapeutic benefit. We conducted a dosimetric analysis to quantify the differences between MC and PB algorithms in the clinical setting of dose-painted nasopharyngeal cancer intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy. Patients and Methods: Plans of 14 patients treated with PB analytical algorithm optimized and calculated (PBPB) were retrospectively analyzed. The PBPB plans were recalculated using MC to generate PBMC plans and, finally, reoptimized and recalculated with MC to generate MCMC plans. The plans were compared across several dosimetric endpoints and correlated with documented toxicity. Robustness of the planning scenarios (PBPB, PBMC, MCMC) in the presence of setup and range uncertainties was compared. Results: A median decrease of up to 5 Gy (P < .05) was observed in coverage of planning target volume high-risk, intermediate-risk, and low-risk volumes when PB plans were recalculated using the MC algorithm. This loss in coverage was regained by reoptimizing with MC, albeit with a slightly higher dose to normal tissues but within the standard tolerance limits. The robustness of both PB and MC plans remained similar in the presence of setup and range uncertainties. The MC-calculated mean dose to the oral avoidance structure, along with changes in global maximum dose between PB and MC dosimetry, may be associated with acute toxicity-related events. Conclusion: Retrospective analyses of plan dosimetry quantified a loss of coverage with PB that could be recovered under MC optimization. MC optimization should be performed for the complex dosimetry in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma before plan acceptance and should also be used in correlative studies of proton dosimetry with clinical endpoints.

296 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are approved for recurrent and/or metastatic squamous head and neck cancers (R/M HNSCC). Landmark trials have shown stable or improved patient (pt) reported quality of life outcomes. It is unclear how these translate into gastrostomy (G) and tracheostomy (T) dependence, opioid use, or ER/unplanned hospitalizations (UH) in an unselected population. We sought to explore these in our large single institution cohort. Methods: We reviewed R/M HNSCC pts receiving ICI at a tertiary referral NCI designated cancer center. Outcomes were assessed between the first dose of ICI and 100 days after the last dose of ICI. Overall survival (OS) was estimated via Kaplan-Meier estimation. Differences between groups were assessed via log-rank testing procedure and adjusted for age, tumor characteristics, and smoking status. Results: Between 1/2012 and 12/2019, we treated 152 pts with ICI, mostly male (n = 142, 82%), partnered/married (n = 103, 68%), with median age 64 years (range 23 – 90). The most common primary sites were oropharynx (n = 55, 36%) and oral cavity (n = 33, 22%). 50 (35%) had ≥2 lines of prior systemic therapy and 29 (19%) had an ECOG ≥2. The most common pt races were white (n = 114, 75%), Asian (n = 14, 9%), and Hispanic, any race (n = 6, 4%). 83 (55%) and 23 (15%) had history of smoking and heavy alcohol use respectively. Median duration of ICI therapy was 95 days (range 1-1720). Prior to ICI, 49 (32%) had G, 17 (11%) had T, and 15 (10%) had both. While on ICI, 6 (4%) had G placed, and 1 (1%) had a G removed; 1 (1%) had T placed, and 2 (1%) had T removed. 69 (45%) had ER visits and 57 (38%) had UH; 11 (7%) were directly related to ICI adverse effects. Prior to ICI, 104 (68%) were on opiates; requirements increased in 58 (41%) pts and decreased in 17 (12%) pts. Pre-existing G prior to ICI had worse OS on log-rank testing, but significance was lost when adjusted for variables. Pre-existing T prior to ICI (p = 0.001, HR 3.08, 95% Cl [1.56,6.08]), and pts with increasing opiate requirements on ICI (p value = 0.0007, HR 2.13, 95% Cl [1.38,3.28]) had worse OS. Conclusions: In our cohort, ICI did not change G or T usage. Pre-existing T and increasing opiate use were also associated with worse survival. Our data supports augmentation of palliative care and advanced care planning in the R/M HNSCC population.

Background and objective Fast neutron radiotherapy (NRT) is a high linear energy transfer (LET) particle therapy that offers a local control (LC) advantage over low-LET X-rays in the treatment of advanced and unresectable salivary gland malignancies. However, in tumors approximating the base of skull (BOS), target volumes may be underdosed to minimize toxicity to the central nervous system (CNS). In this setting, a proton beam boost to the underdosed part of the tumor may improve LC. We report our early experience with a hybrid neutron-proton approach in patients with BOS involvement. Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed 29 patients with locally advanced and unresectable salivary gland tumors involving the BOS between 2014-2018. The median age of the patients was 56 years, with the majority of them having adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACC) (79%) with advanced T4a/b disease (86%), pathologic perineural invasion (PNI) (55.2%), and orbital invasion (34.5%). Five patients (17.2%) were cases of re-irradiation. Surgical resection was attempted in 15 patients (51.7%), of which none achieved negative margins. The median neutron dose was 18.4 neutron Gray (nGy) with a sequential proton boost (PB) with a median dose of 25 Gy [relative biological effectiveness (RBE)] (range: 16-45 Gy). Toxicity was graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. Descriptive statistics and the Kaplan-Meier method were used. Results At a median follow-up of 18.9 months [interquartile range (IQR): 6.1-32.5], the entire cohort's overall survival (OS) was 93.1%, progression-free survival (PFS) was 79.3%, and LC was 89.7%. Among patients who were not re-irradiated (n=24), the most commonly recorded acute grade 3 toxicities were mucositis (50%) and dermatitis (37.5%). There was no documented acute grade 4/5 events. Late grade 3/4 events included trismus (n=1), hearing loss (n=2), visual loss (n=6), and bone necrosis (n=1). There were no reported late grade 5 events in de novo patients. Conclusion In this challenging cohort with a poor prognosis, early outcomes for a hybrid neutron-proton approach were found to be promising. Further studies involving longer follow-ups with a larger cohort of patients are required to validate our findings.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive cutaneous malignancy. In the advanced setting, MCC is often treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. X-ray radiation therapy (XRT) is commonly used for palliation. There is an unmet need for new treatment options in patients progressing on immunotherapy and XRT. We present 2 patients with progressive MCC who were successfully treated with high linear energy transfer neutron radiation therapy (NRT). CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Patient A, an 85-year-old white male with chronic lymphocytic leukemia had progressive MCC with multiple tumors on the face despite prior XRT and ongoing treatment with pembrolizumab. The 5 most symptomatic lesions were treated with a short course of NRT (2 × 3 Gy) while continuing pembrolizumab. All irradiated facial lesions demonstrated a complete response 2 weeks after NRT. Remarkably, an additional 4 lesions located outside the NRT fields also completely resolved. Patient B, a 78-year-old white male with no immunosuppressive condition had recurrent MCC in the scalp and bilateral cervical nodes. The painful, ulcerative tumors on his scalp were progressing despite multiple courses of XRT and multiple immunotherapy regimens, including pembrolizumab. He was treated with NRT (16-18 Gy) to the scalp and had a complete response with successful palliation. While his disease subsequently progressed outside the NRT fields, the response to NRT bridged him to receive further investigational immunotherapies, and he remains disease free 3 years later. CONCLUSION: Short courses of high linear energy transfer particle therapy deserve consideration as a promising modality for local tumor control in XRT refractory tumors. The out-of-field response suggests that NRT has potential for synergizing with immunotherapy. While more data are required to identify optimal NRT parameters, the NRT dose that potentiates an antitumor immune response appears to be well below organ-at-risk tolerance.

Introduction: Post operative radiotherapy (PORT) for resected cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) with perineural invasion (PNI) is controversial. Therefore, we conducted a survey to study the patterns of practice and determine whether there is a consensus among Radiation Oncologists (ROs) regarding prescribed dose to the post-operative bed and elective treatment of lymph nodal regions and neural pathways. We also compared the recommendations of the ROs with the 2010 NCCN guidelines. Materials & Methods: In March 2011, we contacted all ROs and trainees residing in the USA through their email address listed in the 2009 ASTRO membership directory. Our survey contained clinical vignettes involving Mohs micrographically resected CSCC with microscopic PNI (mPNI) or clinical (symptomatic or radiographic) cPNI, including named nerve PNI (nPNI). For each vignette, physicians indicated if PORT was appropriate and further specified the dose and volume to treat at standard fractionation. Chemotherapy was not allowed. Responses were stratified according to years of post residency experience, special interest in treating head and neck cancers and number of cases treated per year. We defined consensus as 80% concordance. Results: Three hundred and fifty two responses were completed and analyzed. Approximately 95% recommended PORT for cPNI whereas a mean of 59% recommended PORT for mPNI. There was no consensus regarding dose to the operative bed. Approximately 30% of respondents prescribed 54 Gy or less at standard fractionation, while the NCCN guidelines recommend 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Only 24% were willing to prescribe 66Gy or more in cases of radiographically identified gross residual disease. In cases of mPNI, there was a consensus not to treat elective nodal volumes; on average only 14% treated elective nodal regions. Even in the presence of cPNI, only 40% recommended elective nodal irradiation (ENI). ROs with over ten years’ experience were more willing to offer ENI for cPNI than less experienced ROs (43% vs. 25% p=0.004). For mPNI, there was no consensus for elective neural pathway irradiation (ENP); whereas for cPNI a clear consensus emerged with over 90% recommending ENP. The NCCN guidelines do not have specific recommendations for ENI or ENP. Stratification based on years of post residency experience (l10 vs. 10+ yrs), number of cases treated per year (0-7 vs. 8+ cases per year) and special interest in treating head and neck cancers did not yield any other statistically significant differences. Conclusions: Our data from 2011 demonstrates a lack of consensus among ROs regarding radiation dose to the post-operative bed and designation of elective targets (i.e. nodal regions and neural pathways) for resected CSCC with PNI. In contrast to the NCCN guidelines, nearly 30% of ROs under-dosed the post-operative bed. Majority of ROs omitted elective nodal irradiation even in cases of cPNI. While there was a consensus to treat ENP for cPNI, there was wide variability for treating ENP for mPNI. Since this survey was conducted, several guidelines have been published to educate radiation oncologists regarding electively targeting the neural pathways. Updated More data to evaluate the impact of these guidelines is needed in this setting to guide ROs and achieve homogenous practice patterns.

Our purpose was to compare dosimetric parameters and late gastrointestinal outcomes between patients treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) for localized prostate cancer with rectal balloon immobilization versus a hydrogel rectal spacer.Patients with localized, clinical stage T1-4 prostate adenocarcinoma were treated at a single institution using conventionally fractionated, dose-escalated PBT from 2013 to 2018. Patient-reported gastrointestinal toxicity was prospectively collected, and the incidence of rectal bleeding was retrospectively reviewed from patient records.One hundred ninety-two patients were treated with rectal balloon immobilization, and 75 were treated with a rectal spacer. Rectal hydrogel spacer significantly improved rectal dosimetry while maintaining excellent target coverage. The 2-year actuarial rate of grade 2+ late rectal bleeding was 19% and 3% in the rectal balloon and hydrogel spacer groups, respectively (P = .003). In univariable analysis, the probability of grade 2+ rectal bleeding was significantly correlated with increasing rectal dose. In multivariable analysis, only receipt of spacer hydrogel (hazard ratio, 0.145; P = .010) and anticoagulation use (hazard ratio, 5.019; P.001) were significantly associated with grade 2+ bleeding. At 2-year follow-up, patient-reported Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite bowel quality of life composite scores were less diminished in the hydrogel spacer group (absolute mean difference, 5.5; P = .030).Use of rectal hydrogel spacer for prostate PBT is associated with a significantly lower incidence of clinically relevant, late rectal bleeding and lower decrement in long-term, patient-reported bowel quality of life compared with rectal balloon immobilization. Our results suggest that hydrogel spacer may improve rectal sparing compared with rectal balloon immobilization during PBT for prostate cancer.

Highlights • Benefits of proton beam therapy for treatment of prostate cancer are unknown. • Data comparing pencil beam vs. passive scatter/uniform scanning protons are limited. • Significant differences in acute toxicity between proton modalities were observed. • Future studies evaluating differences between the two proton modalities are needed., Background and purpose Patient-level benefits of proton beam therapy (PBT) relative to photon therapy for prostate cancer (PC) continue to be the focus of debate. Although trials comparing the two modalities are underway, most are being conducted using “conventional” PBT (passive scattering/uniform scanning [PS/US]) rather than pencil beam scanning (PBS). The dosimetric benefits of PBS are well-known, but comparative data are limited. This analysis compares PBS toxicity rates with those of PS/US in a prospective multicenter registry. Methods We evaluated acute/late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity rates for men with low-to-intermediate risk PC enrolled in PCG 001-09. Acute toxicities with the two techniques were compared using χ2 tests, and the cumulative incidence methods for late toxicity. Multivariable analyses (MVAs) for acute toxicity were performed using logistic regression, and cox proportional hazards models for late toxicity. Results Patients were treated using PS/US (n = 1105) or PBS (n = 238). Acute grade ≥2 GI toxicity in PBS did not significantly differ from that with PS/US (2.9% and 2.1%, respectively; P = 0.47). Acute grade ≥2 GU toxicity was significantly higher with PBS (21.9% and 15.1%; P

Purpose: Proton therapy can potentially improve the therapeutic ratio over conventional radiation therapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC) by decreasing acute and late toxicity. We report our early clinical experience with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with OPSCC treated with IMPT at our center. Endpoints include local regional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), tumor response, and toxicity outcomes. Toxicity was graded as per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier method were used. Results: We treated 46 patients from March 2015 to August 2017. Median age was 58 years, 93.5% were male, 67% were nonsmokers, 98% had stage III-IVB disease per the 7th edition of the AJCC [American Joint Committee on Cancer] Cancer Staging Manual, and 89% were p16 positive. Twenty-eight patients received definitive IMPT to total dose of 70 to 74.4 Gy(RBE), and 18 patients received postoperative IMPT to 60 to 66 Gy(RBE) following transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Sixty-four percent of patients received concurrent systemic therapy. There were no treatment interruptions or observed acute grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Eighteen patients had percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement; the majority (14) were placed prophylactically. The most common grade 3 acute toxicities were dermatitis (76%) and mucositis (72%). The most common late toxicity was grade 2 xerostomia (30%). At a median follow-up time of 19.2 months (interquartile range [IQR], 11.2-28.4), primary complete response was 100% and nodal complete response was 92%. One patient required a salvage neck dissection owing to an incomplete response at 4 months. There were no recorded local regional or marginal recurrences, PFS was 93.5%, and OS was 95.7%. Conclusion: Our early results for IMPT in OPSCC are promising with no local regional or marginal recurrences and a favorable toxicity profile. Our data add to a body of evidence that supports the clinical use of IMPT. Randomized comparative trials are encouraged.

e18052 Background: Timely administration of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) impacts oncologic outcomes in resected squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Salivary gland cancers (SGCs) are uncommon, and timing of PORT has not been extensively explored. We aimed to determine if the interval between surgery and PORT impacts outcomes in SGCs. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with SGCs who underwent curative intent surgical resection followed by adjuvant PORT at our tertiary referral center. Demographic, tumor, and treatment data were collected. Patients with non-oncologic resections and/or delay of > 6 months to radiation start were excluded. Locoregional control (LRC), relapse free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. A multivariate analysis explored the association between demographics, tumor characteristics, and PORT timing with oncologic outcomes using a stepwise Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Between 1/1/1997 and 12/31/2017 180 eligible patients were identified. Patient characteristics are described in Table. The median time to PORT start was 61 (range 8-121) days, 169 (93.9%) of patients received neutron beam PORT. With a median follow up of 8.2 years in surviving patients, the 5-year OS and LRC estimates were 73% and 67%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, only nodal involvement, histologic grade, and age at diagnosis were associated with OS, while nodal involvement, tumor size, and age at time of diagnosis were associated with LCR and RFS. Time to PORT start or completion was not statistically associated with survival outcomes on multivariate analysis. Conclusions: SGC patients who underwent surgery in our tertiary institution received PORT within a median of 61 days after surgery. With long term follow up, PORT timing in this retrospective series was not associated with worse oncologic outcomes, and support timely administration of PORT with 3 months of surgical resection. Further work is necessary to assess generalizability of these results.[Table: see text]

e18004 Background: Anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) represent an established standard of care for patients with recurrent/metastatic head & neck squamous cell carcinoma (RMHNSCC). Landmark studies excluded patients with ECOG performance status (PS) ≥ 2; the benefit of ICI in this population is therefore unknown. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed RMHNSCC patients who received at least 1 dose of ICI at our institution. Demographic data and clinical outcomes were obtained; the latter included objective response to ICI (ORR), physician-documented CTCAE grade 2+ toxicity (irAE), and any unplanned hospitalization within 100-days of last ICI dose (UH). Associations between demographic data and clinical outcomes were explored using both uni- and multivariate analysis. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model; ORR, irAE, and UH were evaluated with logistic regression. This project was approved by our institutional IRB. Results: We identified 152 RMHNSCC patients who were treated with ICI between 1/2013 and 1/2019. ECOG PS was 0 in 42 (27%), 1 in 75 (50%), 2 in 27 (18%), 3 in 2 (1%), and unknown in 6 (4%) patients. The median age was 61 (range: 25 - 90). 124 (82%) were male, 124 (82%) were white, and 69 (45%) were never-smokers. The most common primary sites were the oropharynx (n = 59, 40%), oral cavity (n = 39, 26%), nasopharynx (n = 11, 7%), and larynx (n = 10, 6%). 54 (36%) were p16+ oropharynx cancers. CPS score was available in 10 (6.6%). Single agent ICI was received by 118 (77%) patients. 66 (44%) had a documented irAE and 54 (36%) had an UH. A multivariate model for OS containing PS, smoking status and HPV status showed a strong association between inferior OS and ECOG 2/3 compared to 0/1 (p < 0.001; HR = 3.30, CI = 2.01-5.41), as well as former (vs. never) smoking status (p < 0.001; HR = 2.17, CI = 1.41-3.35). Current smoking (p = 0.25) did not reach statistical significance. On univariate analysis, poor PS was associated with inferior ORR (p = 0.03; OR = 0.25, CI = 0.06-0.77) and increased UH (p = 0.04; OR = 2.43, CI = 1.05—5.71). There was no significant association between irAE and any patient characteristic. Conclusions: We observed inferior overall survival among ICI-treated RMHNSCC patients with ECOG 2/3 in our single-institution, retrospective series. Our findings help frame discussion of therapeutic options in this poor-risk population. Further study must be done to determine which interventions are of greatest benefit for RMHNSCC patients with declining performance status.

BACKGROUND Prospective quality metrics for neck dissection have not been established for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between lymph node counts from neck dissection, local-regional recurrence, and overall survival. METHODS The number of lymph nodes counted from neck dissection in patients treated in 2 NRG Oncology trials (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] 9501 and RTOG 0234) was evaluated for its prognostic impact on overall survival with a multivariate Cox model adjusted for demographic, tumor, and lymph node data and stratified by the postoperative treatment group. RESULTS Five hundred seventy-two patients were analyzed at a median follow-up of 8 years. Ninety-eight percent of the patients were pathologically N+. The median numbers of lymph nodes recorded on the left and right sides were 24 and 25, respectively. The identification of fewer than 18 nodes was associated with worse overall survival in comparison with 18 or more nodes (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.74; P = .007). The difference appeared to be driven by local-regional failure (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.02-2.08; P = .04) but not by distant metastases (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.77-1.53; P = .65). When the analysis was limited to NRG Oncology RTOG 0234 patients, adding the p16 status to the model did not affect the HR for dissected nodes, and the effect of nodes did not differ with the p16 status. CONCLUSIONS The removal and identification of 18 or more lymph nodes was associated with improved overall survival and lower rates of local-regional failure, and this should be further evaluated as a measure of quality in neck dissections for mucosal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 2016;122:3464–71. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Purpose The aim of this study was to review institutional outcomes for advanced thyroid cancers treated with fast neutron radiation therapy (FNRT) and photon radiation therapy (RT). Methods and materials In all, 62 consecutive patients were analyzed. Fifty-nine had stage IV disease. Twenty-three were treated with FNRT and 39 with photon RT. Median follow-up was 14 months. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results There was no significant difference in median OS between FNRT and photon RT (26 vs 16 months; P = .49). Patients with well-differentiated histologies had superior median OS with photon RT (17 vs 69 months; P = .04). There was a nonsignificant trend toward improved OS with FNRT for medullary and anaplastic histologies. Conclusions Outcomes in this study are in line with historical results. There is an apparent detriment in OS with FNRT for well-differentiated histologies and a trend toward improved OS with medullary and anaplastic histologies that warrants further investigation.

Background Postoperative cisplatin and radiation is the standard of care for high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We have used cetuximab and radiation in the postoperative setting for patients deemed poor candidates for cisplatin. Methods We retrospectively identified 40 patients who received cetuximab and radiation for resected locoregionally advanced SCCHN between 2006 and 2013 at our institution. Results The 2-year Kaplan–Meier estimates were: overall survival (OS) 41%, recurrence-free survival (RFS) 34%, locoregional control 63%, and distant metastatic control 59%. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥1 predicted for inferior OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.43; p = .003), RFS (HR = 4.07; p = .007), and locoregional control (HR = 4.92; p = .04) in multivariate analysis. Conclusion Patients with resected high-risk SCCHN treated with postoperative cetuximab and radiation have suboptimal therapeutic outcomes. Further study of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness compared to radiation alone is warranted. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2016

The University of Washington (UW) Clinical Neutron Therapy System (CNTS) has been used to treat over 3300 patients. Treatment planning for these patients is currently performed using an MV x-ray model in Pinnacle® adapted to fit measurements of fast neutron output factors, wedge factors, depth-dose and lateral profiles. While this model has provided an adequate representation of the CNTS for 3D conformal treatment planning, later versions of Pinnacle did not allow for isocentric gantry rotation machines with a source-to-axis distance of 150 cm. This restriction limited the neutron model to version 9.0 while the photon and electron treatment planning at the UW had moved on to newer versions. Also, intensity modulated neutron therapy (IMNT) is underdevelopment at the UW, and the Pinnacle neutron model developed cannot be used for inverse treatment planning. We have used the MCNP6 Monte Carlo code system to develop Collapsed Cone (CC) and Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) neutron scattering kernels suitable for integration into the RayStation treatment planning system. Kernels were generated for monoenergetic neutrons with energies ranging from 1 keV to 51 MeV, i.e. the energy range most relevant to the CNTS. Percent depth dose (PDD) profiles computed in RayStation for the CC and SVD kernels are in excellent agreement with each other for depths beyond the beam's dose build-up region (depths greater than about 1.7 cm) for open 2.8 × 2.8 cm2, 10.3 × 10.3 cm2, and 28.8 × 32.8 cm2 fields. Lateral profiles at several depths, as well as the PDD, calculated using the CC kernels in RayStation for the full CNTS energy spectrum pass a 3%/3 mm gamma test for field sizes of 2.8 × 2.8 cm2, 10.0 × 10.3 cm2, and 28.8 × 32.8 cm2.

e17553 Background: The association between completion time of proton therapy(PT) in prostate cancer and biochemical control is unknown. Methods: We queried the multi-institutional, prospectively collected, proton collaborative group registry for prostate cases treated definitively with PT. Kaplan meier methodology was used for biochemical failure free (bFF) rates and multivariable regression analyses (MVA) were used to identify correlates of treatment interruptions (TI) and bF. Results: After exclusion, 2794 men with 693 low, 869 favorable intermediate, 627 unfavorable intermediate, and 605 high risk prostate cancers had available data. The median age was 68 years(40-92), 90% were white and 8% were black. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was given to 676 patients, 312 treatments were hypofractionated, and median EQD2 dose = 75(74-86) GyE1.5. Kaplan-meier median follow-up was 79 months. In total 900 patients (32%) had at least one TI. Shorter treatments (HR = 0.95 per day, P < 0.01) and high risk (HR = 0.72, P < 0.04) cases were less likely to have Tis on MVA. There was no difference in 5-year bFF rate with (92.7) and without (93.1%) TIs. In a subset of only high risk patients treated with ADT (n = 385), the 5-year bFF was 83% without TIs and 75% with TIs (HR = 2.10, P = 0.06). This discrepancy was significant with multivariable binomial regression (HR = 2.36, P = 0.03), and the bF difference was greatest when > 5 treatment days were missed per receiver operating characteristic curve. Conclusions: Largely, there was no correlation between TIs and bF in prostate cancer treated with PT, however completion time may play a more significant role in high risk disease.

e18516 Background: Demographic and EOLHCU trends are undefined in the growing population of IO-treated RMHNSCC; we sought to study these in a single institution retrospective study. Methods: We identified 228 RMHNSCC pts who received ≥1 IO dose between 01/2013 and 12/2018; of these, 74 were deceased with accessible EOLHCU data such as advanced care plan documentation (ACPD) or evidence of systemic therapy or ER/hospital/ICU admission within 30 days of death (DOD). Demographic, tumor and treatment data were obtained. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method; multivariable analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model. In an exploratory analysis, EOLHCU was compared to a cohort of 379 deceased thoracic malignancy (TM) pts using a chi-square test. This project was approved by our institutional IRB. Results: Median pt age was 62 (25 – 90). Most were male (56, 75%), white (60, 81%), current/former smokers (46, 62%); 34 (46%) smoked ≥10 pack years. Common primary sites included the oral cavity (28, 37.8%) and oropharynx (24, 32.4%). ECOG PS at IO initiation was 0 in 15 pts (20%,) 1 in 37 (50%), 2 in 20 (27%), 3 in 1 (1%), and unknown in 1 (1%). Of the 42 (57%) treated off-trial, 18 (42%) had an ECOG ≥ 2. 71 (95%) had prior curative intent therapy. 42 (57%) had distant metastases. Compared to TM, IO-treated RMHNSCC pts were more likely to have ACPD (66% vs. 45% p < 0.01), an ED visit (42.3% vs 19.5%, p < 0.01) and/or a hospital admission (42.3% vs 17%, p < 0.01) within 30 DOD. There was no difference in ICU admissions within 30 DOD (9.9% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.81), ICU deaths (7% vs. 4%, p = 0.4), or systemic therapy within 7 (4.2% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.63), 14 (8.5% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.76) or 30 (25% vs 19%, p = 0.31) DOD. Among IO-treated RMHNSCC pts, multivariable analysis revealed inferior OS with worse PS (ECOG 2-3 vs. 0: HR = 7.76, p = 0.00002, 95% CI = 3.07 - 19.64; ECOG 1 vs. 0: HR = 2.97, p = 0.008, CI = 1.33 - 6.62). OS also decreased with smoking status (current/former vs. never: HR 2.18, p = 0.007, CI = 1.24-3.84). No association was observed between ECOG PS, age or smoking status at IO initiation and any EOLHCU metric. Conclusions: At our center, a significant proportion of deceased, IO-treated RMHNSCC pts had an ECOG PS ≥ 2 and an inferior OS compared to ECOG 0/1. Exploratory comparison with a non-RMHNSCC TM cohort suggests high rates of EOLHCU within 30 DOD despite ACPD, representing an opportunity for supportive care augmentation. Whether EOLHCU differs among IO vs non-IO treated RMHNSCC is unknown and merits further study.

Background We report prospectively captured clinical toxicity and patient reported outcomes in a single institutional cohort of patients treated for prostate cancer with proton beam therapy (PBT). This is the largest reported series of patients treated mostly with pencil beam scanning PBT. Methods We reviewed 231 patients treated on an IRB approved institutional registry from 2013 to 2016; final analysis included 192 patients with > 1-year of follow-up. Toxicity incidence was prospectively captured and scored using CTCAE v4.0. International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score, and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) bowel domain questionnaires were collected at each visit. Univariate Cox regression was used to explore associations of grade 2+ toxicity with clinical, treatment, and dosimetric variables. Results Median follow-up was 1.7 years. Grade 3 toxicity was seen in 5/192 patients. No grade 4 or 5 toxicity was seen. Patient reported quality-of-life showed no change in urinary function post-radiation by IPSS scores. Median SHIM scores declined by 3.7 points at 1-year post-treatment without further decrease beyond year 1. On univariate analysis, only younger age (HR = 0.61, p = 0.022) was associated with decreased sexual toxicity. EPIC bowel domain scores declined from 96 at baseline (median) by an average of 5.4 points at 1-year post-treatment (95% CI: 2.5–8.2 points, p

Objectives Radiation therapy is commonly used to treat head and neck malignancies. While there is abundant research regarding photon radiation therapy, literature on neutron radiotherapy (NRT) and oral complications is limited. This study aims to determine: (1) the 6-year and 10-year locoregional control and survival rates, (2) factors associated with locoregional control and survival and (3) the frequency of oral complications in patients undergoing NRT for salivary gland malignancies. Materials and methods This is a retrospective cohort study. The sample was composed of patients with salivary gland malignancies treated with NRT between 1997 and 2010. Data were extracted from patient charts, telephone surveys, and social security records. Multivariate competing risk and Cox regression models were used to assess predictors of locoregional control and survival. Results The sample was composed of 545 subjects with a mean age of 54.2 years (±16). The predominant tumor and location were adenoid cystic carcinoma (47%) and the parotid (56%). Multivariate analysis indicated that positive surgical margins, biopsied/inoperable malignancies, neck involvement, and lymphovascular invasion were prognostic risk factors associated with decreased survival. The 6- and 10-year locoregional control rates were 84% and 79%. The 6- and 10-year survival rates were 72% and 62%. Osteoradionecrosis developed in 3.4% of subjects. Conclusions The 6- and 10-year locoregional control and survival rates compare favorably to rates reported for conventional photon radiation. Osteoradionecrosis rates were comparable to that of photon radiation treatment (2–7%). Given the potential benefits of NRT, healthcare professionals should be educated regarding its indications and oral complications.

Purpose We characterized both physician- and patient-reported rates of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in patients treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) at our institution for prostate adenocarcinoma and identified factors associated with toxicity. Methods and materials We treated 192 patients with PBT between July 2013 and July 2016. Included patients had ≥1 year of follow-up. Potential preexisting clinical and treatment-related risk factors for GI toxicity were recorded. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 was used to score toxicity. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) bowel domain questionnaires assessed patient-reported quality of life. Associations between grade (GR) 2+ toxicity and clinical, treatment, and dosimetric factors were assessed using Cox models and corresponding hazard ratios. Results The median follow-up was 1.7 years. Most of the observed GI toxicity (>90%) was in the form of rectal bleeding (RB). GR2+ GI toxicity and RB actuarial rates specifically at 2 years were 21.3% and 20.4%, respectively. GR3 toxicity was rare, with only 1 observed RB event. No GR4/5 toxicity was seen. The EPIC bowel domain median score was 96 (range, 61-100) pretreatment, 93 (range, 41-100) at 1 year, 89 (range, 57-100) at 1.5 years, and 89 (range, 50-100) at 2 years. Anticoagulation use was the only factor selected during multivariate analysis for predicting GR2+ RB, with a resulting concordance index of 0.59 (95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.68; P = .088). Type of proton technology (pencil beam scanning vs uniform scanning) and number of fields treated per day (1 vs 2) showed no significant difference in toxicity rate. Conclusions PBT was associated with acceptable rates of GR2+ transient GI toxicity, mostly in the form of RB, which correlated with anticoagulation use. High EPIC bowel domain quality of life was maintained in the 2 years after treatment.

Purpose: Post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) for resected cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) with perineural invasion (PNI) is controversial. Therefore, we conducted a survey to review treatment recommendations among Radiation Oncologists (ROs) in the management of CSCC with PNI. Materials & Methods: In March 2011, we contacted all ROs and trainees in the US through email addresses listed in the 2009 ASTRO directory. Our web-based survey presented clinical vignettes involving Mohs micrographically resected CSCC with microscopic PNI (mPNI) or clinical PNI (cPNI). For each vignette, ROs were asked to indicate if PORT was appropriate and to further specify the dose and volume to treat. Results: Three hundred fifty two responses were completed and analyzed. The majority of ROs (72%) had over 10 years of post residency experience. 64% of the sampled ROs had a special interest in treating head and neck cancers, and 64% treated 4 or more cases per year. Approximately 95% recommended PORT for cPNI whereas 59% recommended PORT for mPNI. Post residency experience (10+ yrs vs. = 0.005) and for mPNI of deep subcutaneous non-named nerve involvement (80% vs. 60%, p = 0.001). ROs treating 8 or more cases per year (vs. = 0.01). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates significant variability among ROs in the management of CSCC with mPNI. For cases of cPNI, an overwhelming majority recommended PORT. In cases of mPNI, there was no consensus for recommending PORT, although experienced practitioners had a lower threshold for offering treatment. These results indicate the need for prospective clinical studies to clarify the role of PORT in CSCC patients with mPNI.

Purpose: Treatment guidelines for patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer are largely determined by risk stratification (low, intermediate, high), which is based upon 3 parameters: T-stage, prostate-specific antigen value, and Gleason score. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the results of a central review for patients with prostate cancer treated at the center during its first year of operation. Patients and Methods: Between March 13, 2013, and April 14, 2014, a total of 53 patients with prostate cancer, with Gleason scores initially determined by outside pathologists, were treated at the center. Tissue specimens were obtained for all patients and were reviewed by the Department of Pathology at the University of Washington. The results of this review were tabulated and analyzed. Results: The original Gleason score was confirmed in 42 cases. The original Gleason score was upgraded in 7 cases and downgraded in 4 cases. Four patients who were originally classified in a low-risk catego...

INTRODUCTION Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a fatal disease lacking standardized treatment. We describe the use of fast neutron radiation therapy in MPM patients referred to the Department of Radiation Oncology at the University of Washington Medical Center. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective chart review of MPM patients receiving neutron radiotherapy treatment from 1980 to 2012. RESULTS A total of 30 MPM patients received fast neutron radiotherapy as part of their treatment regimen. Median age at diagnosis was 59.6 years (range, 46.6 to 72.3 y). Eighteen patients received fast neutron radiotherapy as a component of trimodality treatment. Median overall survival was 20.3 months (range, 5.5 to 73.3 mo) with 1 patient censored at 34.8 months and all other patients with confirmed dates of death. One patient receiving radiotherapy alone as a palliative measure died during radiation treatment. One patient was unable to tolerate radiotherapy and stopped before completing prescribed treatment. On univariate analysis, Brigham Stage at presentation was a significant predictor of survival (P

Background Primary head and neck mucosal melanomas (HNMMs) are rare tumors managed with surgery and/or radiotherapy and associated with poor outcomes. Given their radioresistance, high linear energy transfer radiotherapy with neutrons may improve local control. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 14 patients with HNMM treated with neutrons at the University of Washington from 1990 to 2012. Five patients had T3 disease, 9 had T4 disease, 3 had regional nodal disease, and 4 had distant metastases at diagnosis. Primary sites were sinonasal (n=10), lip (n=2), and palate (n=2). Ten patients had initial surgical resection/debulking. Results Nine patients had gross residual disease, 6 had complete response, and 3 had partial response. Local control was achieved in 79% until death or last follow-up, and 50% developed distant metastases. Kaplan–Meier 5-year local control was 66% and overall survival was 21%. Conclusion High rates of locoregional control were achieved with neutrons, despite the presence of gross disease. Survival was limited by early distant metastases. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 36: 1162–1167, 2014

Background Conformal or intensity-modulated radiation therapy can be improved by using a customized tongue-displacing (CTD) stent. These stents are designed to either move healthy oral tissues out of the path of the radiation beam or stabilize mobile tissues to allow more precise field control. Methods The authors describe CTD stent construction for both tongue-deviating and tongue-depressing applications. Results CTD stents enable clinicians to achieve more predictable and consistent radiation dosimetry planning while sparing greater volumes of healthy tissue from damage. They have been well tolerated by patients. Conclusions Use of CTD stents results in increased oral mucosal sparing, ensures reproducible immobilization and is incorporated readily into the clinical practice of radiation oncology. Practical Implications Clinicians can reduce or avoid significant morbidity to healthy oral tissues by using CTD stents. This can lead to better outcomes and improved quality of life for patients receiving head and neck radiation therapy.

We describe the first reported use of neutron radiation therapy for successful palliation of treatment refractory Merkel cell carcinoma. The patient was a 78-year-old man with Merkel cell carcinoma involving the scalp and bilateral cervical lymph nodes. The extensive coalescing scalp lesions were locally destructive, painful, and highly detrimental to his overall quality of life, and he had previously progressed through 3 courses of conventional x-ray–based radiation therapy and multiple immunotherapy regimens. We treated him with neutron radiation therapy, and he experienced a complete and durable local response with minimal toxicity. High linear energy transfer particle therapy approaches deserve consideration as a treatment option in cancers that are refractory to standard radiation therapy.

Radiotherapy has a proven role in the management of most types of head and neck cancer but results are suboptimal in certain clinical situations. Particle radiotherapy offers the opportunity to improve outcomes in such cases. Fast neutron radiotherapy is a high linear energy type of radiotherapy and may be advantageous for many “radioresistant” tumors such as salivary gland malignancies, mucosal melanomas, and sarcomas. Proton radiotherapy offers greatly improved dose distributions compared to conventional photon radiation and this allows for higher radiation doses and potentially improved outcomes for tumors near critical structures such as the brain stem and optic structures and in the re-irradiation setting. The applicability of proton radiotherapy in other settings is also discussed. Heavier charged particles, such as carbon ions, offer both improved radiation dose distributions and the radiobiological advantage of fast neutron radiotherapy. While data is limited, it appears that carbon ions are advantageous in the same subset of tumors as fast neutron radiotherapy, but the improved dose distribution theoretically should result in reduced morbidity. Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a technique that has recently been used to treat recurrent head and neck tumors and new boron carrier compounds are being developed for this application. Clinical data on the use of each of these modalities in the treatment of head and neck cancer is reviewed and their current role in the treatment of head and neck cancer is summarizedKey Words: Neutron radiotherapy, proton radiotherapy, carbon ion radiotherapy, BNCT