Search

This study aims to evaluate the relation between the lumbosacral trunk (LT) and the sacro-iliac joint (SIJ). In forty anatomic specimens (hemipelves) a classical antero-lateral approach to the SIJ was performed. The SIJ was marked at the linea terminalis (reference point A). Reference point B was situated at the upper edge of the interosseous sacro-iliac ligament. The length of the SIJ (distance A to B) and the distance between point A and the ventral branch of the fourth (L4) and fifth (L5) lumbar spinal nerves at the linea terminalis were measured. The SIJ had a mean length of 58.0 mm. The ventral branch of L5 was located closer to the SIJ in very long SIJs (mean length: ≥ 6.5 cm; mean distance: 9.8 mm) compared to very short joints (≤ 5 mm; mean distance: 11.3 mm). For the ventral branch of L4, very long SIJs had a mean distance of 7 mm and very short joints an average distance of 9.7 mm between point A and the nerve branch. A safe zone of approximately 1 cm to 2 cm (anterior to posterior) is present on the sacral surface (lateral to medial) for safe fixation of plates during anterior plate stabilization of the SIJ. Pelves with a shorter dorsoventral diameter of the most superior part of the SIJ apparently give more space for inserting plates.

The aim of the study was to design a convenient technique for dorsal minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of extra-articular fractures of both distal thirds of the humeral shaft as well as to characterise the course and proximity of the radial nerve (RN) and the axillary nerve (AN).The collective consisted of 20 upper extremities of human adult body donors. A 3.5 mm Locking Compression Plate (LCP), an extra-articular distal humerus plate was inserted through a MIPO approach including two incisions. The primary incision was performed 5 cm in lenght on the dorsal side of the lateral epicondyle. An additional 5 cm incision was conducted distal to the humeral deltoid muscle insertion and the RN was depicted. The longest suitable plate was advanced under nerve protection starting distally and fixed by locking screws. A third incision with a length of 5 cm was made beginning at the distal border of the deltoid muscle, and a muscle split was performed to dissect the AN. The respective plate holes, where the AN and RN were located and the distances between the nerves were examined.The RN was mostly (30%) localised on holes 6 and 7 (starting distally). The AN laid directly on the plate in 65% and on the most proximal plate hole in 12 cases, but was never situated underneath the plate. The distance between the AN and RN was at mean 93.5 mm.MIPO via a dorsal method proves to be a noteworthy technique and valuable option as indicated by our results. This 5-5-(5) concept may be performed as a two-incision or three-incision technique for extra-articular fractures of both distal thirds of the humerus.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to project the A1-pulley of the thumb onto the total thumb length to enable its complete division with and without direct sight. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 50 hands from adult human cadavers. The proximal and distal borders of the A1-pulley were measured with reference to the first metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ). The length of the thumb was defined as the interval between the first carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) and the apex of the thumb. The length of the pulley is calculated proportionally with reference to the line between the first CMCJ and apex of the thumb. RESULTS: Approximated by computing 95% confidence intervals, the pulley can be expected to lie in an area between 34.0% (proximal border) and 57.8% (distal border) alongside this line. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous and minimally-invasive division of the A1-pulley needs to be performed between 34.0 and 57.8% of the length between the first CMCJ and apex of the thumb.

Background The introduction of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) as a treatment option in complex proximal humeral fractures, including patients with poor bone quality, has significantly extended the surgical armamentarium.The aim of this study was to investigate the mid-term outcome following fracture RSA (FRSA) in acute or sequelae, as well as salvage procedures. It was hypothesized that revision FRSA (SRSA) leads to similar mid-term results as primary fracture treatment by RSA (PRSA).Methods This retrospective case-series study describes the radiological and clinical mid-term outcome in a standardized single-center and one-material Inlay design. Patients who underwent FRSA between 2008 and 2017 were matched (minimum follow-up: two years, minimum age at the time of operation: 60 years).The assessment tools used for functional findings were range of motion (ROM), Visual Analogue Scale, absolute (CS) plus normative Constant Score, Quick DASH, and Subjective Shoulder Value. All adverse events and the radiological results and their clinical correlations were analyzed statistically (using α = 5% and 95% confidence intervals).Results Following FRSA, 68 patients were included (mean age: 72.5 years, mean FU: 46 months). Forty-two underwent primary RSA (PRSA), 26 revision RSA (SRSA). Adverse advents were observed in 13% (n = 9/68).No statistically significant results were found in PRSA and SRSA in effect sizes by scores, whereby the failed osteosynthesis SRSA subgroup obtained significantly negative values in ROM subzones (flexion: p = .046, abduction: p = .037). Decreased tubercle healings in PRSA relative to SRSA were observed (p = .006). A missing bony healing of the tubercles was related to significant negative clinical outcome (all scores: p < .05, external rotation: p = .019). In SRSA, significant postoperative improvements could be stated (CS: 23 to 56 at mean, p = .001), the time from index surgery to operative revision revealed no associations in functional findings.Conclusions RSA is an effective option in severe shoulder fracture management with predictable results as salvage as well as first-line treatment. Promising mid-term functional results, reasonable implant survival rates, and a high patient satisfaction could be achieved.Trial RegistrationNot applicable, level of evidence III.