Search

Competing Interests: I took part in an advisory board and in a health economics interview regarding the progression-free survival data from the ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18 study previously published,(7) but was not involved in the current Article.(3) I report grants from AstraZeneca, Deciphera, and GSK; consulting fees from GSK, Ipsen, and MSD; speakers fees from AstraZeneca, BMS, GSK, Ipsen, MSD, Pfizer, and Pharmamar; support for meetings or travel from AstraZeneca, GSK, Ipsen, MSD, Pfizer, and Pharmamar; and participation on data safety monitoring board or advisory boards for AstraZeneca, BMS, Eisai, GSK, Ipsen, and MSD.

Until recently, patients diagnosed with locally advanced and metastatic endometrial cancer faced significant challenges in their treatment due to limited options and poor prognostic outcomes. The sequencing of tumors has been a major advancement in its management. It has led to The Cancer Genome Atlas classification currently used in clinical practice and the initiation of several clinical trials for innovative treatments targeting principally signaling pathways, immune checkpoints, DNA integrity, growth factors, hormonal signaling, and metabolism. Numerous clinical trials are investigating a combinatorial approach of these targeted therapies to counter tumoral resistance, cellular compensatory mechanisms, and tumor polyclonality. This review provides a comprehensive overview of historical, current, and promising therapies in advanced and metastatic endometrial cancer. It particularly highlights clinical research on targeted and hormonal therapies, but also immunotherapy, reflecting the evolving landscape of treatment modalities for this disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Christine Gennigens = All support for the present manuscrit: no disclosures. Grant/contracts: Astra-Zeneca, GSK, Deciphera. Consulting fees: Ipsen, GSK, MSD. Honoraria for lectures: MSD, BMS, Ipsen, Pfizer, Pharmamar, Astra-Zeneca, GSK. Support for meetings and/or travel: Ipsen, Pharmamar, Pfizer, MSD, GSK, Astra-Zeneca. Participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board: MSD, BMS, Ipsen, Astra-Zeneca. GSK, Eisai. Others authors – No conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recurrent cervical cancer is a life-threatening disease, with limited treatment options available when disease progression occurs after first-line combination therapy., Methods: We conducted a phase 3, multinational, open-label trial of tisotumab vedotin as second- or third-line therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive tisotumab vedotin monotherapy (2.0 mg per kilogram of body weight every 3 weeks) or the investigator's choice of chemotherapy (topotecan, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, irinotecan, or pemetrexed). The primary end point was overall survival., Results: A total of 502 patients underwent randomization (253 were assigned to the tisotumab vedotin group and 249 to the chemotherapy group); the groups were similar with respect to demographic and disease characteristics. The median overall survival was significantly longer in the tisotumab vedotin group than in the chemotherapy group (11.5 months [95% confidence interval {CI}, 9.8 to 14.9] vs. 9.5 months [95% CI, 7.9 to 10.7]), results that represented a 30% lower risk of death with tisotumab vedotin than with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.89; two-sided P = 0.004). The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 4.4) with tisotumab vedotin and 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 3.1) with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.82; two-sided P<0.001). The confirmed objective response rate was 17.8% in the tisotumab vedotin group and 5.2% in the chemotherapy group (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.1 to 7.6; two-sided P<0.001). A total of 98.4% of patients in the tisotumab vedotin group and 99.2% in the chemotherapy group had at least one adverse event that occurred during the treatment period (defined as the period from day 1 of dose 1 until 30 days after the last dose); grade 3 or greater events occurred in 52.0% and 62.3%, respectively. A total of 14.8% of patients stopped tisotumab vedotin treatment because of toxic effects., Conclusions: In patients with recurrent cervical cancer, second- or third-line treatment with tisotumab vedotin resulted in significantly greater efficacy than chemotherapy. (Funded by Genmab and Seagen [acquired by Pfizer]; innovaTV 301 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04697628.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Objective: Retifanlimab is a humanized immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody against programmed death 1 being investigated in several solid tumor types. We report final results from patients with recurrent microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) endometrial cancer treated with retifanlimab in a POD1UM-101 expansion cohort., Methods: Eligible patients (≥18 years; histologically proven/unresectable/recurrent, MSI-H/dMMR endometrial cancer; checkpoint inhibitor naive) received retifanlimab 500 mg intravenously every 4 weeks for ≤2 years. Primary endpoint was safety/tolerability., Results: At data cutoff (May 17, 2023), 76 patients had received at least one retifanlimab dose. Median (range) age was 67 (49-88) years; 88.2% of patients had recurrent metastatic disease and 80.3% had visceral metastases. Seventy-five patients (98.7%) had received at least one prior systemic therapy. Median retifanlimab exposure was 10.0 (0.03-25.9) months; 23 patients completed treatment. 38 patients (50.0%) had grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), most commonly anemia (n = 10 [13.2%]). 63 patients (82.9%) had treatment-related AEs (TRAEs; grade ≥3, n = 14 [18.4%]); most common was fatigue (n = 14 [18.4%]). Two patients had TEAEs that led to death; no TRAEs were fatal. 39 patients had objective responses (51.3%; 95% CI, 39.6-63.0%); 19 patients (25.0%) had complete response and 20 (26.3%) had partial response. Median progression-free survival was 12.2 months; 30 patients (76.9%) had duration of response (DOR) ≥12 months. Median DOR was not reached after median follow-up time of 26.0 months., Conclusions: Retifanlimab was generally well tolerated and demonstrated encouraging anti-tumor activity in patients with pre-treated recurrent MSI-H/dMMR endometrial cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Patricia Pautier received travel funding from Amgen, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Novartis, PharmaMar, and Tesaro; had an advisory role with AstraZeneca, Genmab, MSD, Onxeo, PharmaMar, and Roche; and received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Eisai, MSD, and PharmaMar. Domenica Lorusso had consultancy roles with Novartis and PharmaMar; had advisory and invited speaker roles with AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Genmab, GlaxoSmithKline, ImmunoGen, MSD, and Seagen; received institutional support from Clovis Oncology, Corcept, Genmab, ImmunoGen, and MSD; and received grants for academic trials from Clovis Oncology, GlaxoSmithKline, and MSD. Christine Gennigens received a grant from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline; received consulting fees from Ispen, GlaxoSmithKline, and MSD; received honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, MSD, Pfizer, and PharmaMar; received support for meetings and/or travel from GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, MSD, Pfizer, and PharmaMar; and participated in a data safety monitoring board/advisory board for AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, and MSD. Laurence Gladieff participated in an advisory board for AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, GlaxoSmithKline, and MSD; received honoraria from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, PharmaMar, and Roche; and received congress funding from GlaxoSmithKline, PharmaMar, Roche, and Viatris. Jill Bowman, Chuan Tian, and Mark Cornfeld have employment and stock ownership at Incyte Corporation. Toon Van Gorp received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, BionTech, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, ImmunoGen, Incyte, Karyopharm, MSD, OncXerna, Seagen, Tubulis, and Zentalis; had corporate-sponsored research from Amgen, AstraZeneca, and Roche; and received honoraria for lectures from GlaxoSmithKline, ImmunoGen, and MSD. All payments were via the institution. Dominique Berton and Anna Kryzhanivska have no conflict of interest related to this manuscript., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Tissue factor is highly expressed in cervical carcinoma and can be targeted by tisotumab vedotin (TV), an antibody-drug conjugate. This phase Ib/II study evaluated TV in combination with bevacizumab, pembrolizumab, or carboplatin for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (r/mCC)., Methods: This open-label, multicenter study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03786081) included dose-escalation arms that assessed dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and identified the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of TV in combination with bevacizumab (arm A), pembrolizumab (arm B), or carboplatin (arm C). The dose-expansion arms evaluated TV antitumor activity and safety at RP2D in combination with carboplatin as first-line (1L) treatment (arm D) or with pembrolizumab as 1L (arm E) or second-/third-line (2L/3L) treatment (arm F). The primary end point of dose expansion was objective response rate (ORR)., Results: A total of 142 patients were enrolled. In dose escalation (n = 41), no DLTs were observed; the RP2D was TV 2 mg/kg plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on day 1 once every 3 weeks, pembrolizumab 200 mg on day 1 once every 3 weeks, or carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1 once every 3 weeks. In dose expansion (n = 101), the ORR was 54.5% (n/N, 18/33; 95% CI, 36.4 to 71.9) with 1L TV + carboplatin (arm D), 40.6% (n/N, 13/32; 95% CI, 23.7 to 59.4) with 1L TV + pembrolizumab (arm E), and 35.3% (12/34; 19.7 to 53.5) with 2L/3L TV + pembrolizumab (arm F). The median duration of response was 8.6 months, not reached, and 14.1 months, in arms D, E, and F, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events (≥15%) were anemia, diarrhea, nausea, and thrombocytopenia in arm D and anemia in arm F (none ≥15%, arm E)., Conclusion: TV in combination with bevacizumab, carboplatin, or pembrolizumab demonstrated manageable safety and encouraging antitumor activity in treatment-naive and previously treated r/mCC.

Objective: Recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer has a poor prognosis with limited therapeutic options. Sub-therapeutic intra-tumoral drug concentrations may add to therapy resistance. CPC634 (docetaxel entrapped in CriPec nanoparticles) was designed to enhance tumor accumulation of drug with localized drug release at the target site to increase therapeutic efficacy. This study investigated the therapeutic effect of CPC634 in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer., Methods: According to a Simon 2-stage design trial, the first stage included 13 patients, and 12 patients were enrolled in the second stage. Eligible patients had measurable disease and had progressed ≤6 months after the last platinum-based therapy. Platinum-refractory disease was excluded. In stage 1, the number of previous treatment lines was unlimited; in the second stage, a maximum of two prior lines altogether were allowed. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) V1.1. Secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival at 6 months, cancer antigen 125 (CA125) response, and disease control rate., Results: The patients' median age was 66 years (range 22-77) and most were International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III (56%). The median number of previous treatment lines was 3 (range 3-5) in stage I and 2 (range 1-4) in stage II of the study. None of the patients had an objective response, one patient had a CA125 response (5%), and seven patients had stable disease at first evaluation (35%). Median progression-free survival was 1.4 months in stage 1 and 3.0 months in stage 2. Adverse events (all grades) were mainly gastrointestinal in 24 patients (96%), fatigue in 11 (44%), dyspnea in 10 (40%), and infections in 10 (40%) of patients. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 14 patients (36%), including gastrointestinal in 4 (16%), anemia in 3 (12%), and febrile neutropenia, fatigue, chronic kidney disease, dehydration, and hypertension each in 1 (4%) patient. The trial was stopped prematurely due to futility., Conclusions: Treatment with CPC634 was feasible, but without apparent clinical activity in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Side effects were mainly gastrointestinal in 24 (96%) patients, including nausea, vomiting, and decreased appetite, fatigue, anemia, and dyspnea., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CJFR was employee and is meanwhile paid consultant for Cristal Therapeutics, while RH was employed till August 2021 by Cristal Therapeutics., (© IGCS and ESGO 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: To develop machine learning models to predict para-aortic lymph node (PALN) involvement in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) before chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using 18 F-FDG PET/CT and MRI radiomics combined with clinical parameters., Methods: We retrospectively collected 178 patients (60% for training and 40% for testing) in 2 centers and 61 patients corresponding to 2 further external testing cohorts with LACC between 2010 to 2022 and who had undergone pretreatment analog or digital 18 F-FDG PET/CT, pelvic MRI and surgical PALN staging. Only primary tumor volumes were delineated. Radiomics features were extracted using the Radiomics toolbox®. The ComBat harmonization method was applied to reduce the batch effect between centers. Different prediction models were trained using a neural network approach with either clinical, radiomics or combined models. They were then evaluated on the testing and external validation sets and compared., Results: In the training set (n = 102), the clinical model achieved a good prediction of the risk of PALN involvement with a C-statistic of 0.80 (95% CI 0.71, 0.87). However, it performed in the testing (n = 76) and external testing sets (n = 30 and n = 31) with C-statistics of only 0.57 to 0.67 (95% CI 0.36, 0.83). The ComBat-radiomic (GLDZM&#95;HISDE&#95;PET&#95;FBN64 and Shape&#95;maxDiameter2D3&#95;PET&#95;FBW0.25) and ComBat-combined (FIGO 2018 and same radiomics features) models achieved very high predictive ability in the training set and both models kept the same performance in the testing sets, with C-statistics from 0.88 to 0.96 (95% CI 0.76, 1.00) and 0.85 to 0.92 (95% CI 0.75, 0.99), respectively., Conclusions: Radiomic features extracted from pre-CRT analog and digital 18 F-FDG PET/CT outperform clinical parameters in the decision to perform a para-aortic node staging or an extended field irradiation to PALN. Prospective validation of our models should now be carried out., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Molecular algorithms may estimate the risk of recurrence and death for patients with endometrial cancer (EC) and may impact treatment decisions. To detect microsatellite instabilities (MSI) and p53 mutations, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and molecular techniques are used. To select the most appropriate method, and to have an accurate interpretation of their results, knowledge of the performance characteristics of these respective methods is essential. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of IHC versus molecular techniques (gold standard). One hundred and thirty-two unselected EC patients were enrolled in this study. Agreement between the two diagnostic methods was assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of the IHC were calculated. For MSI status, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 89.3%, 87.3%, 78.1% and 94.1%, respectively. Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.74. For p53 status, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 92.3%, 77.1%, 60.0% and 96.4%, respectively. Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.59. For MSI status, IHC presented a substantial agreement with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) approach. For the p53 status, the moderate agreement observed between IHC and next generation sequencing (NGS) methods implies that they cannot be used interchangeably.

Purpose: This monocentric study aimed to assess the impact of technical advancement in brachytherapy (BT) on local control (LC) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC)., Methods: Since 2010, 211 patients with LACC have been treated with 45/50.4 Gy or 60 Gy radiochemotherapy (RTCT) followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) at the authors' institution. In 2013, combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy (BT IC/IS) was implemented and in 2018, pulsed-dose-rate BT (PDR-BT) was replaced by high-dose-rate BT (HDR-BT). LC, CSS, and morbidity according to the RTOG/EORTC scoring system were analyzed. Dose-volume parameters for the high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) and organs at risk (OAR) were reported., Results: While 27 (12.8%) patients died of LACC, complete local remission was achieved in 199 (94.3%). Local relapse decreases with a high D95 in the HRCTV (hazard ratio, HR = 0.85, p = 0.0024). D95 in the HRCTV is lower after 60 Gy even if interstitial BT is used. Mean D95 in the HRCTV is 78.2 Gy, 83.3 Gy, and 83.4 Gy with PDR-BT IC, PDR-BT IC/IS, and HDR-BT IC/IS, respectively, after 45/50.4 Gy. D2 cc of OARs is significantly reduced by using interstitial BT. The mean rectum and sigmoid D2 cc are about 61.5 Gy with PDR-BT IC/IS and significantly decreased with HDR-BT IC/IS. This translates into a low fistula incidence. A very low rate of severe gastrointestinal (3.4%) and genitourinary (2.3%) toxicity was observed with HDR-BT IC/IS., Conclusion: This large monocentric study provides further evidence that implementation of BT IC/IS has an impact on D95 in the HRCTV, LC, and CSS. There are no differences between HDR and PDR in terms of efficacy, D95 in the HRCTV, and toxicity grade ≥ 3., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)