Search

Aims: The addition of extended capecitabine after standard neo/adjuvant chemotherapy shows controversial results in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients between SYSUCC-001 trial and CIBOMA trial. Patients presents different responses to diverse regimens, and different dose strengths also affect their prognosis. Hence, we tried to investigate whether the benefit from SYSUCC-001 is effected by the strength of previous adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: We reviewed the neo/adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, dose divide by body surface area, etc. of TNBC patients in SYSUCC-001 trial. Their therapeutic dose were classified into consistent and inconsistent with CIBOMA trial. Besides, we stratified patients into the strong regimen arm (A/EC-T and TA/EC) and medium regimen arm (A/EC, TA/E, CMF, FA/EC, FA/EC-T, and TC) according to their specific neo/adjuvant treatment.Subsequently, we compared differences in baseline characteristics between the strong and medium regimen arms, and further investigated the impact of therapeutic regimens and dose on the survival outcome of TNBC patients in SYSUCC-001 trial(the median follow-up is 61months, interquartile range, 44-82months). Results: A total of 434 TNBC patients were included in this study. Among them, patients who used strong chemotherapy regimen accounted for about 76.74%, and those who used medium regimen accounted for 23.26%. About 32.3% and 52.2% patients received the standard doses of anthracyclines and taxanes separately according to minimum acceptable regimens for chemotherapy in CIBOMA trial. In our analysis we found the dose strength did not affect the DFS in the observe group. However, the standard dose of taxanes improved the DFS in capecitabine group [HR, 2.04 (1.02 - 4.06)]. The interaction analysis showed that the strength of treatment regimenand anthracycline dose did not affect DFS. Whereas, subgroup analysis showed TNBC patients with standard dose of taxanes significantly benefited from capecitabine (P = 0.014). In addition, the standard dose of taxanes could improve DFS. Conclusions: The strength of neo/adjuvant chemotherapy does not affect the curative effect of capecitabine maintenance chemotherapy. The benefits of the SYSUCC-001 study are mainly from one-year capecitabine administration. Moreover, the standard dose of chemotherapy especially taxanes is a positive factor for the effect of capecitabine treatment. So in some special condition, such as patients can’t endure the side effect of the chemotherapy, we’d better reduce the dose of anthracycline not the taxanes.

Background Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) DNA detection in the nasopharynx is considered a biomarker for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We evaluated its performance as a reflex test to triage EBV seropositives within an NPC screening program in China. Methods The study population was embedded within an ongoing NPC screening trial and included 1111 participants who screened positive for anti-EBV VCA (antibodies against EBV capsid antigens)/EBNA1 (EBV nuclear antigen1)-IgA antibodies (of 18 237 screened). Nasopharynx swabs were collected/tested for EBNA1 gene EBV DNA load. We evaluated performance of EBV DNA in the nasopharynx swab as a reflex test to triage EBV serological high-risk (those referred to endoscopy/MRI) and medium-risk (those referred to accelerated screening) individuals. Results By the end of 2019, we detected 20 NPC cases from 317 serological high-risk individuals and 4 NPC cases from 794 medium-risk individuals. When used to triage serological high-risk individuals, nasopharynx swab EBV DNA was detected in 19/20 cases (positivity rate among cases: 95.0%; 95% CI, 75.1%–99.9%), with a referral rate of 63.4% (201/317, 95% CI, 57.8%–68.7%) and NPC detection rate among positives of 9.5% (19/201, 95% CI, 5.8%–14.4%). The performance of an algorithm that combined serology with triage of serology high-risk individuals using EBV DNA testing yielded a sensitivity of 72.4% (95% CI, 3.0%-81.4%) and specificity of 97.6% (95% CI, 97.2%-97.9%). When used to triage EBV serological medium-risk individuals, the positivity rate among cases was 75.0% (95% CI, 19.4%-99.4%), with a referral rate of 61.8% (95% CI, 58.4%-65.2%) and NPC detection rate among positives of 0.6% (95% CI, 0.1%-1.8%). Conclusions Nasopharynx swab EBV DNA showed promise as a reflex test to triage serology high-risk individuals, reducing referral by ca. 40% with little reduction in sensitivity compared to a serology-only screening program.

Despite evidence suggesting the utility of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) markers to stratify individuals with respect to nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) risk in NPC high-risk regions, no validated NPC risk prediction model exists. We aimed to validate an EBV-based NPC risk score in an endemic population undergoing screening for NPC. This prospective study was embedded within an ongoing NPC screening trial in southern China initiated in 2008, with 51 235 adult participants. We assessed the score's discriminatory ability (area under the receiver-operator-characteristics curve, AUC). A new model incorporating the EBV score, sex and family history was developed using logistic regression and internally validated using cross-validation. AUCs were compared. We also calculated absolute NPC risk combining the risk score with population incidence and competing mortality data. A total of 151 NPC cases were detected in 2008 to 2016. The EBV-based score was highly discriminating, with AUC = 0.95 (95% CI = 0.93-0.97). For 90% specificity, the score had 87.4% sensitivity (95% CI = 81.0-92.3%). As specificity increased from 90% to 99%, the positive predictive value increased from 2.4% (95% CI = 1.9-3.0%) to 12.5% (9.9-15.5%). Correspondingly, the number of positive tests per detected NPC case decreased from 272 (95% CI = 255-290) to 50 (41-59). Combining the score with other risk factors (sex, first-degree family history of NPC) did not improve AUC. Men aged 55 to 59 years with the highest risk profile had the highest 5-year absolute NPC risk of 6.5%. We externally validated the discriminatory accuracy of a previously developed EBV score in a high-risk population. Adding nonviral risk factors did not improve NPC prediction.