Search

Background: Genetic testing to identify germline high-risk pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes is increasingly part of the breast cancer diagnostic pathway. Novel patient-centred pathways may offer opportunity to expand capacity and reduce turnaround time., Methods: We recruited 1140 women with unselected breast cancer to undergo germline genetic testing through the BRCA-DIRECT pathway (which includes a digital platform, postal saliva sampling and a genetic counsellor telephone helpline). Ahead of consenting to the test, participants were randomised to receive information about genetic testing digitally (569/1140, 49.9%) or via a pre-test genetic counselling consultation (571/1140, 50.1%)., Results: 1001 (87.8%) participants progressed to receive their pre-test information and consented to testing. The primary outcome, uptake of genetic testing, was higher amongst participants randomised to receive digital information compared with those randomised to a pre-test genetic counselling consultation (90.8% (95% CI: 88.5% to 93.1%) vs 84.7% (95% CI: 81.8% to 87.6%), p = 0.002, adjusted for participant age and site). Non-inferiority was observed in relation to patient knowledge, anxiety, and satisfaction., Conclusions: Findings demonstrate that standardised, digital information offers a non-inferior alternative to conventional genetic counselling, and an end-to-end patient-centred, digital pathway (supported by genetic counselling hotline) could feasibly be implemented into breast oncology settings., Clinical Trial Registration: The study is registered with, and protocol available on, ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04842799)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Latines suffer from breast cancer (BC), due to elevated biological and social determinants of health (SDOH) risks. This study compares the effects of different strategies on uptake of cancer genetic services, specifically hereditary cancer risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing, and risk-based BC care., Design/methods: In Chicago, Illinois, Aim 1 participants are recruited from a federally qualified health center (FQHC) and community venues. For Aim 1, eligible participants: (1) are female; (2) are Latine; (3) are 30+ years old; (4) have personal or family history of BC or cancers with shared hereditary mutations; (5) have at least one SDOH risk; and (6) have not received any cancer genetic services. Participants are randomly assigned to different study arms. Both arms include phone-based sessions, FQHC-based navigation for SDOH, and low- or no-cost cancer genetic services. The educate sessions focus on risk assessment and prevention. The empower sessions focus on risk assessment and equip participants with the skills to share information about FQHC-based cancer genetic services. For Aim 2, eligible participants are: (1) female; (2) network members of Aim 1 participants; and (3) eligible for BC screening based on guidelines recommended by the American Cancer Society (ACS). Primary outcomes include uptake of any cancer genetic services. Analyses will also explore intervention differences by neighborhood context., Discussion: This is one of the first trials focused on Latines' participation in cancer genetic services and risk-based BC care within the context of SDOH - which has major implications for equity in precision cancer prevention., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: As a mega-biobank linked to a national healthcare system, the Million Veteran Program (MVP) can directly improve the health care of participants. To determine the feasibility and outcomes of returning medically actionable genetic results to MVP participants, the program launched the MVP Return of Actionable Results (MVP-ROAR) Study, with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) as an exemplar actionable condition., Methods: The MVP-ROAR Study consists of a completed single-arm pilot phase and an ongoing randomized clinical trial (RCT), in which MVP participants are recontacted and invited to receive clinical confirmatory gene sequencing testing and a telegenetic counseling intervention. The primary outcome of the RCT is 6-month change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) between participants receiving results at baseline and those receiving results after 6 months., Results: The pilot developed processes to identify and recontact participants nationally with probable pathogenic variants in low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) on the MVP genotype array, invite them to clinical confirmatory gene sequencing, and deliver a telegenetic counseling intervention. Among participants in the pilot phase, 8 (100%) had active statin prescriptions after 6 months. Results were shared with 16 first-degree family members. Six-month ΔLDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) after the genetic counseling intervention was -37 mg/dL (95% CI: -12 to -61; P = .03). The ongoing RCT will determine between-arm differences in this primary outcome., Conclusion: While underscoring the importance of clinical confirmation of research results, the pilot phase of the MVP-ROAR Study marks a turning point in MVP and demonstrates the feasibility of returning genetic results to participants and their providers. The ongoing RCT will contribute to understanding how such a program might improve patient health care and outcomes., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04178122., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Fragile X syndrome is the leading genetic cause of intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorders. Female premutation carriers exhibit no obvious symptoms during reproductive age, but the premutation allele can expand to full mutation when transmitted to the fetus. Given the relatively low prevalence but large population, the distinct health care system, the middle-income economic status, and low awareness among public and medical professionals, the optimal genetic screening strategy remains unknown. We conducted a pilot study of Fragile X carrier screening in China, involving 22,245 pregnant women and women with childbearing intentions, divided into control and pilot groups. The prevalence of Fragile X carriers in the control group was 1 of 850, similar to East Asian populations. Strikingly, the prevalence of Fragile X carriers in the pilot group was 1 of 356, which can be attributed to extensive medical training, participant education, and rigorous genetic counseling and testing protocols. Cost-effectiveness analyses of four strategies-no screening, population-based screening, targeted screening, and our pilot screening-indicated that our pilot screening was the most cost-effective option. A follow-up survey revealed that 55% of respondents reported undergoing screening because of their family history. We have successfully established a standardized system, addressing the challenges of low prevalence, limited awareness, and genetic testing complexities. Our study provides practical recommendations for implementing Fragile X carrier screening in China., Competing Interests: Disclosure Statement None declared., (Copyright © 2024 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Pregnancy planning and genetic testing (PPGT) has emerged as a tool in reproductive healthcare, offering parents-to-be insight in their risks of having a child with a genetic disorder. This paper reviews the advantages, drawbacks and challenges associated with PPGT, providing some practical guidance for health care professionals. Advantages include identification of genetic risks, a possibility to informed reproductive decision-making, and the potential to reduce the parents-to-be risk for an affected child. Challenges and drawbacks include provision of service, ethical considerations, genetic counselling complexities, and the need to increase public and professional awareness by comprehensive education and accessibility. Practical guidance involves considerations for selecting appropriate candidates, counselling strategies, and how to integrate PPGT into existing healthcare frameworks. By addressing these factors, PPGT can offer an increased reproductive informed choice for the individual and the couple reducing the burden of disease in the family.

Importance: Increasing numbers of unaffected individuals could benefit from genetic evaluation for inherited cancer susceptibility. Automated conversational agents (ie, chatbots) are being developed for cancer genetics contexts; however, randomized comparisons with standard of care (SOC) are needed., Objective: To examine whether chatbot and SOC approaches are equivalent in completion of pretest cancer genetic services and genetic testing., Design, Setting, and Participants: This equivalence trial (Broadening the Reach, Impact, and Delivery of Genetic Services [BRIDGE] randomized clinical trial) was conducted between August 15, 2020, and August 31, 2023, at 2 US health care systems (University of Utah Health and NYU Langone Health). Participants were aged 25 to 60 years, had had a primary care visit in the previous 3 years, were eligible for cancer genetic evaluation, were English or Spanish speaking, had no prior cancer diagnosis other than nonmelanoma skin cancer, had no prior cancer genetic counseling or testing, and had an electronic patient portal account., Intervention: Participants were randomized 1:1 at the patient level to the study groups at each site. In the chatbot intervention group, patients were invited in a patient portal outreach message to complete a pretest genetics education chat. In the enhanced SOC control group, patients were invited to complete an SOC pretest appointment with a certified genetic counselor., Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were completion of pretest cancer genetic services (ie, pretest genetics education chat or pretest genetic counseling appointment) and completion of genetic testing. Equivalence hypothesis testing was used to compare the study groups., Results: This study included 3073 patients (1554 in the chatbot group and 1519 in the enhanced SOC control group). Their mean (SD) age at outreach was 43.8 (9.9) years, and most (2233 of 3063 [72.9%]) were women. A total of 204 patients (7.3%) were Black, 317 (11.4%) were Latinx, and 2094 (75.0%) were White. The estimated percentage point difference for completion of pretest cancer genetic services between groups was 2.0 (95% CI, -1.1 to 5.0). The estimated percentage point difference for completion of genetic testing was -1.3 (95% CI, -3.7 to 1.1). Analyses suggested equivalence in the primary outcomes., Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of the BRIDGE equivalence trial support the use of chatbot approaches to offer cancer genetic services. Chatbot tools can be a key component of sustainable and scalable population health management strategies to enhance access to cancer genetic services., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03985852.

Introduction: Genetic testing is used across medical disciplines leading to unprecedented demand for genetic services. This has resulted in excessive waitlists and unsustainable pressure on the standard model of genetic healthcare. Alternative models are needed; e-health tools represent scalable and evidence-based solution. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of the Genetics Navigator, an interactive patient-centred digital platform that supports the collection of medical and family history, provision of pregenetic and postgenetic counselling and return of genetic testing results across paediatric and adult settings., Methods and Analysis: We will evaluate the effectiveness of the Genetics Navigator combined with usual care by a genetics clinician (physician or counsellor) to usual care alone in a randomised controlled trial. One hundred and thirty participants (adults patients or parents of paediatric patients) eligible for genetic testing through standard of care will be recruited across Ontario genetics clinics. Participants randomised into the intervention arm will use the Genetics Navigator for pretest and post-test genetic counselling and results disclosure in conjunction with their clinician. Participants randomised into the control arm will receive usual care, that is, clinician-delivered pretest and post-test genetic counselling, and results disclosure. The primary outcome is participant distress 2 weeks after test results disclosure. Secondary outcomes include knowledge, decisional conflict, anxiety, empowerment, quality of life, satisfaction, acceptability, digital health literacy and health resource use. Quantitative data will be analysed using statistical hypothesis tests and regression models. A subset of participants will be interviewed to explore user experience; data will be analysed using interpretive description. A cost-effectiveness analysis will examine the incremental cost of the Navigator compared with usual care per unit reduction in distress or unit improvement in quality of life from public payer and societal perspectives., Ethics and Dissemination: This study was approved by Clinical Trials Ontario. Results will be shared through stakeholder workshops, national and international conferences and peer-reviewed journals., Trial Registration Number: NCT06455384., Competing Interests: Competing interests: YB and MC are cofounders of Genetics Adviser., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Most relatives of women with ovarian cancer are unaware of their increased risk for cancer and their eligibility for genetic counseling. State cancer registries offer a platform to communicate about inherited risk to this population., Methods: We conducted a two-arm randomized trial to test a theory-based communication intervention-Your Family Connects (YFC)-compared to the standard Georgia Cancer Registry (GCR) contact. A total of 1,938 eligible ovarian cancer survivors were randomly assigned to either the YFC arm (n = 969) or the Standard Care arm (n = 969). We assessed the number of ovarian cancer survivors and their close relatives who logged on to the study website by arm., Results: Survivor reach was significantly higher in the Standard Care arm than YFC (20.8% vs. 15.2%, respectively; P < 0.001). However, reach to relatives was limited to listed relatives in the YFC arm (n = 20, 13.2%), with little participation from those in the Standard Care arm (n = 1, 0.4%). Pooling across arms, minority race, longer time since diagnosis, and older age were all significantly associated with a decreased likelihood that the survivor accessed the website., Conclusions: The YFC intervention showed lower effectiveness for engaging survivors but was more effective than Standard Care in engaging at-risk relatives. Other factors (e.g., time since diagnosis) associated with lower reach must be considered in refining future outreach approaches., Impact: Partnering with a state cancer registry to foster family communication about inherited cancer risk is feasible but the possibility for broad population reach warrants further testing., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Genetic counseling of mosaicism for balanced translocation with a normal cell line at amniocentesis is not difficult because most of the reported cases have normal phenotypes. However, genetic counseling of mosaicism for unbalanced translocation with a normal cell line at amniocentesis remains difficult because cases with mosaic unbalanced translocation with a normal cell line at prenatal diagnosis have been reported to be associated with either normal or abnormal phenotype. This article makes a comprehensive review of the reported cases of de novo or familial mosaic unbalanced translocation with a normal cell line and various counseling issues such as meiotic event, post-zygotic mitotic event, culture artefact, chimerism, uniparental disomy (UPD), jumping translocation, cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured and uncultured amniocytes and among various tissues, perinatal progressive decrease of the unbalanced translocation cell line and a possible favorable fetal outcome. The information provided is useful for obstetricians and genetic counselors during genetic counseling of the parents who wish to keep the babies under such a circumstance., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Studies have consistently shown that psychiatric genetic counseling (pGC) helps people with psychiatric conditions by increasing empowerment and self-efficacy, and addressing emotions like guilt. Yet, it is not routinely provided. Genetic counselors and trainees express low confidence in their ability to provide meaningful pGC, especially in the absence of adequate training. Therefore, to address this gap a "Psychiatric Genetic Counseling for Genetic Counselors" (PG4GC) workshop was developed and delivered to 13 groups of participants (primarily qualified genetic counselors and trainees) between 2015 and 2023 (10 workshops were delivered in-person, and three virtually). Participants completed quantitative questionnaires both before and after completing the workshop to assess their comfort, knowledge, behavior, and feeling of being equipped to provide pGC. In total, 232 individuals completed the pre-workshop questionnaire and 154 completed the post-workshop questionnaire. Participants felt more comfortable, knowledgeable, and equipped to provide pGC, and reported being more likely to address psychiatric concerns after the workshop, regardless of whether they were trainees or practicing professionals and whether they completed the workshop in-person or virtually. This study suggests that the PG4GC workshop is an effective educational tool in pGC training that may aid in broader implementation of the service., (© 2024 The Authors. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: This document addresses the clinical application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies for prenatal genetic diagnosis and aims to establish clinical practice recommendations in Spain to ensure uniformity in implementing these technologies into prenatal care., Methods: A joint committee of expert obstetricians and geneticists was created to review the existing literature on fetal NGS for genetic diagnosis and to make recommendations for Spanish healthcare professionals., Results: This guideline summarises technical aspects of NGS technologies, clinical indications in prenatal setting, considerations regarding findings to be reported, genetic counselling considerations as well as data storage and protection policies., Conclusions: This document provides updated recommendations for the use of NGS diagnostic tests in prenatal diagnosis. These recommendations should be periodically reviewed as our knowledge of the clinical utility of NGS technologies, applied during pregnancy, may advance., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MG-H works in NIMGenetics, a private genetics lab currently performing prenatal NGS., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Fragile X syndrome is the most commonly inherited form of intellectual disability. Identifying fragile X syndrome at a young age can be quite challenging because the classical physical features usually present in late childhood or early adolescence; therefore, it is important to consider genetic testing for all males with unexplained developmental delays, intellectual disability, and autism, females with developmental delays, intellectual disability or autism, and a family history of fragile X gene disorders. There is no specific treatment to manage fragile X syndrome. Still, a prompt referral for early intervention is essential to help maximize the child's learning potential, as well as a referral to child psychology if any behavioral concerns are present. It is of paramount importance for families with a history of fragile X syndrome to have access to genetic counseling as it can aid in future reproductive decisions and the risk of future recurrences of this condition. [ Pediatr Ann . 2024;53(7):e269-e271.] .

Carrier screening has historically assessed a relatively small number of autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions selected based on frequency in a specific subpopulation and association with severe morbidity or mortality. Advances in genomic technologies enable simultaneous screening of individuals for several conditions. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics recently published a clinical practice resource that presents a framework when offering screening for autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions during pregnancy and preconception and recommends a tier-based approach when considering the number of conditions to screen for and their frequency within the US population in general. This laboratory technical standard aims to complement the practice resource and to put forth considerations for clinical laboratories and clinicians who offer preconception/prenatal carrier screening., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Saurav Guha, Mahmoud Aarabi, Marina DiStefano, and Erin Wakeling are directors of molecular testing laboratories that offer carrier screening. Honey V. Reddi is a Consultant Director for Biofidelity Inc. Jeffrey S. Dungan is a member of the Advisory Board for Informed DNA and Medical Codirector at Insight Medical Genetics, which provides genetic laboratory services. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: The incorporation of genetic counseling and testing is essential to evaluation and management of thoracic aortic disease in patients under 60 years of age and those with family histories suspicious for heritable thoracic aortic disease and disorders associated with increased risk for acute type-A aortic dissection., Recent Findings: As many as 20% of individuals with thoracic aortic disease under the age of 60 years have autosomal dominant patterns of inheritance. A considerable number of heritability factors remain undefined for these families., Summary: Genetic aortopathy programs require a collaborative approach including cardiovascular specialists and surgeons, medical geneticists, genetic counselors, and allied healthcare professionals. Comprehensive evaluation and management of these patients includes collection of detailed phenotypic data to inform the broader community and identify new associated and causative genes of interest, genetic modifiers, and other risk factors. These programs optimize outcomes and reduce the overall burden in the population of acute aortic dissection and related comorbidities., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Direct-to-patient telegenetics, which uses video conferencing to connect health professionals directly to patients' devices, has been widely adopted during the pandemic. However, limited evidence currently supports its use in cancer genetic counselling., Methods: Before the pandemic, we conducted a two-arm partially randomised patient-preference pilot trial to evaluate direct-to-patient telegenetics for patients and genetic counsellors. Patients were randomised to a standard care (telephone/in-person) or direct-to-patient telegenetics appointment. Patients completed questionnaires before, during and after appointments measuring: psychological distress, perceived genetic counsellor empathy, telegenetics satisfaction and technical challenges. Genetic counsellor-reported outcomes -measured using purpose-designed questionnaires- included telegenetics satisfaction, therapeutic alliance and time for assessment. Open-ended patient and genetic counsellor questionnaire responses were synthesised using content analysis., Results: Fifty-six patients and seven genetic counsellors participated. Thirteen patients switched appointment type. No significant differences in distress ( P   =  0.84) were identified between direct-to-patient telegenetics and standard care. Perceived genetic counsellor empathy was high for all appointment types. There was no evidence of differences in reported maximum empathy scores between direct-to-patient telegenetics and standard care [telephone ( P   =  0.57); in-person ( P   =  0.44)]. Patients reported high direct-to-patient telegenetics satisfaction despite technical challenges in most appointments (65%). Genetic counsellors were satisfied with direct-to-patient telegenetics and perceived high therapeutic alliance irrespective of appointment type. No significant differences in genetic counsellor time were identified between direct-to-patient telegenetics and standard care [telephone ( P  > 0.90); in-person ( P   =  0.35)]., Discussion: Our results suggest that direct-to-patient telegenetics is a satisfactory service delivery model that does not appear to compromise patient-genetic counsellor relationships or increase patient distress. These findings support direct-to-patient telegenetics use in cancer genetic counselling, although larger trials are needed., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Scalable models for result disclosure are needed to ensure large-scale access to genomics services. Research evaluating alternatives to genetic counseling suggests effectiveness; however, it is unknown whether these findings are generalizable across populations. We assessed whether a letter is non-inferior to telephone genetic counseling to inform participants with no personal or family history of cancer of their normal results. Data were collected via self-report surveys before and after result disclosure (at 1 and 6 months) in a study sample enriched for individuals from underserved populations. Primary outcomes were subjective understanding of results (global and aggregated) and test-related feelings, ascertained via three subscales (uncertainty, negative emotions, and positive feelings) of the Feelings About genomiC Testing Results (FACToR) measure. Secondary outcomes related to satisfaction with communication. Non-inferiority tests compared outcomes among disclosure methods. Communication by letter was inferior in terms of global subjective understanding of results (at 1 month) and non-inferior to telephoned results (at 6 months). Letter was non-inferior to telephone for aggregated understanding (at 6 months). Letter was superior (at 1 month) to telephone on the uncertainty FACToR subscale. Letter was non-inferior to telephone on the positive-feelings FACToR subscale (at 6 months). Letter was non-inferior to telephone for satisfaction with mode of result delivery and genetic test results. Communication via letter was inferior to telephone in communicating the "right amount of information." The use of written communication to relay normal results to low-risk individuals is a promising strategy that may improve the efficiency of care delivery., (© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2024. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) serves to screen couples for their risk of having children affected by monogenic conditions. The included conditions are mostly autosomal recessive or X-linked with infantile or early-childhood onset. Cystic fibrosis, spinal muscular atrophy, and hemoglobinopathies are now recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) for universal screening. Recommendations for further RGCS remain ethnicity based. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors in recent years have recommended universal expanded-panel RGCS and moving towards a more equitable approach. ACOG guidelines state that offering RGCS is an acceptable option, however it has not provided clear guidance on standard of care. Positive results on RGCS can significantly impact reproductive plans for couples, including pursuing in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing, prenatal genetic testing, specific fetal or neonatal treatment, or adoption. RGCS is a superior approach compared to ethnicity-based carrier screening and moves away from single race-based medical practice. We urge the obstetrics and gynecology societies to adopt the guidelines for RGCS put forward by multiple societies and help reduce systemic inequalities in medicine in our new genetic age. Having national societies such as ACOG and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine officially recommend and endorse RGCS would bolster insurance coverage and financial support by employers for RGCS. The future of comprehensive reproductive care in the age of genomic medicine entails expanding access so patients and families can make the reproductive options that best fit their needs., (© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.)

The uptake of genetic counseling and predictive genetic testing by family members at risk for hereditary tumor syndromes is generally below 50%. To address this issue, a new guideline was introduced in the Netherlands in 2019 that aims to improve the sharing of information within families. In addition to cascade screening supported by follow-up telephone calls with the proband, municipal records were accessed to allow the geneticist to contact at-risk family members directly. We evaluated this procedure in 32 families with a (likely) pathogenic germline BRCA1/BRCA2 variant diagnosed at our hospital between May 1, 2020, and July 31, 2021, comparing current uptake with outcomes achieved for 33 families diagnosed in 2014. Fifteen months after diagnostic testing of the proband, the uptake was 43% (120/277), comparable to the 44% (87/200) registered previously. Among a subgroup of women at 50% risk aged 25-75 years, 71% (47/66) were tested, comparable to an earlier uptake of 69% (59/86). Of the 34 at-risk relatives we contacted directly, 17 (50%) underwent predictive testing. In conclusion, we found no evidence that the new procedure leads to a substantially increased uptake. Future research should be primarily aimed at understanding intrafamilial communication barriers., (© 2023 National Society of Genetic Counselors.)

Diabetes mellitus is a group of diseases characterized by hyperglycemia and its consequences, affecting over 34 million individuals in the United States and 422 million worldwide. While most diabetes is polygenic and is classified as type 1 (T1D), type 2 (T2D), or gestational diabetes (GDM), at least 0.4% of all diabetes is monogenic in nature. Correct diagnosis of monogenic diabetes has important implications for glycemic management and genetic counseling. We provide this Practice Resource to familiarize the genetic counseling community with (1) the existence of monogenic diabetes, (2) how it differs from more common polygenic/complex diabetes types, (3) the advantage of a correct diagnosis, and (4) guidance for identifying, counseling, and testing patients and families with suspected monogenic diabetes. This document is intended for genetic counselors and other healthcare professionals providing clinical services in any setting, with the goal of maximizing the likelihood of a correct diagnosis of monogenic diabetes and access to related care., (© 2023 National Society of Genetic Counselors.)

Genetic counseling and treatment options for rare developmental disabilities (DDs) have been revolutionized by the opportunities made possible by using massively parallel sequencing for diagnostic purposes [...].

Purpose: This study aims to shed light on the rather neglected area of research of psychological distress in women facing genetic counselling in Turkey, where few institutions providing such counselling exist., Methods: 105 breast cancer patients presenting for genetic testing completed a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire as well as validated structured questionnaires including the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S/T) and the Health Motivation Sub-dimension of Champion's Health Belief Model Scale., Results: 69.5% of the participants had lost a family member from cancer; 80% said the term "cancer" elicited negative thoughts (e.g., death, fear, and incurable disease). 62.9% and 37.1% attributed cancer to stress or sorrow, and genetic susceptibility, respectively. There was a negative association between health motivation and BDI scores (r:-0.433, p < 0.001). Married individuals had higher BDI and STAI-S scores (p = 0.001, p = 0.01 respectively), as well as lower STAI-T scores (p = 0.006). BDI, STAI-S and STAI-T scores were higher in those refusing genetic testing (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.003 respectively) and those with metastases (p = 0.03, p = 0.01, p = 0.03 respectively). Furthermore, individuals with low health motivation were more likely to exhibit high BDI scores (p < 0.001) and low STAI-T scores (p = 0.02)., Conclusion: Common perceptions and beliefs about cancer and genetic testing during genetic counselling were found to have a negative impact on distress in high-risk women with breast cancer. The negative relationship between psychological distress and health motivation may reduce patients' compliance with genetic counselling recommendations. A comprehensive psychological evaluation should be considered as an important part of genetic counselling., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Multigene panel testing is an important component of cancer treatment plans and risk assessment, but there are many different panel options and choosing the most appropriate panel can be challenging for health care providers and patients. Electronic tools have been proposed to help patients make informed decisions about which gene panel to choose by considering their preferences and priorities., Materials and Methods: An electronic decision aid (DA) tool was developed in line with the International Patient Decision Aids Standards collaboration. The multidisciplinary project team collaborated with an external health care communications agency and the MGH Cancer Center Patient and Family Advisory Council (PFAC) to develop the DA. Surveys of genetic counselors and patients were used to scope the content, and alpha testing was used to refine the design and content., Results: Surveys of genetic counselors (n = 12) and patients (n = 228) identified common themes in discussing panel size and strategies for helping patients decide between panels and in identifying confusing terms for patients and distribution of patients' choices. The DA, organized into 2 major sections, provides educational text, graphics, and videos to guide patients through the decision-making process. Alpha testing feedback from the PFAC (n = 4), genetic counselors (n = 3) and a group of lay people (n = 8) identified areas to improve navigation, simplify wording, and improve layout., Conclusion: The DA developed in this study has the potential to facilitate informed decision-making by patients regarding cancer genetic testing. The distinctive feature of this DA is that it addresses the specific question of which multigene panel may be most suitable for the patient. Its acceptability and effectiveness will be evaluated in future studies., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Introduction: Given the significance of healthcare decisions in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and their impact on patients' lives, this study aims to map the existing literature on decision regret in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations., Methods: A scoping review was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria focused on decision regret in the female population with BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations, with no restrictions on the methodologies of the included studies, but only in the English language. The selection process led to the inclusion of 13 studies., Results: The analysis revealed a significant trend toward decision regret among patients facing complex medical choices. The quality of healthcare communication, decision support, and genetic counselling emerged as key factors influencing patients' perceptions and experiences, with direct implications for their quality of life and psychological well-being. The results suggest that these decisions considerably impact patients, both in terms of clinical outcomes and emotional experiences., Discussion: The investigation highlights the vital importance of a personalized care approach, emphasizing the critical role of managing patients' emotional and psychological complexity. Managing decision regret requires acute attention to individual needs and effective communication to mitigate emotional impact and improve patient outcomes., Conclusions: Insights from a nursing perspective in the analysis of results indicate the need for informed, empathetic, and integrated care that considers the emotional complexity of women with BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations in their lives and health choices.

Over the last years, there has been a growing interest in the clinical manifestations and outcomes of cardiomyopathies in women. Peripartum cardiomyopathy is the only women-specific cardiomyopathy. In cardiomyopathies with X-linked transmission, women are not simply healthy carriers of the disorder, but can show a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations ranging from mild to severe manifestations because of heterogeneous patterns of X-chromosome inactivation. In mitochondrial disorders with a matrilinear transmission, cardiomyopathy is part of a systemic disorder affecting both men and women. Even some inherited cardiomyopathies with autosomal transmission display phenotypic and prognostic differences between men and women. Notably, female hormones seem to exert a protective role in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and variant transthyretin amyloidosis until the menopausal period. Women with cardiomyopathies holding high-risk features should be referred to a third-level center and evaluated on an individual basis. Cardiomyopathies can have a detrimental impact on pregnancy and childbirth because of the associated hemodynamic derangements. Genetic counselling and a tailored cardiological evaluation are essential to evaluate the likelihood of transmitting the disease to the children and the possibility of a prenatal or early post-natal diagnosis, as well as to estimate the risk associated with pregnancy and delivery, and the optimal management strategies., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems such as ChatGPT can take medical examinations and counsel patients regarding medical diagnosis. We aim to quantify the accuracy of the ChatGPT V3.4 in answering commonly asked questions pertaining to genetic testing and counseling for gynecologic cancers., Methods: Forty questions were formulated in conjunction with gynecologic oncologists and adapted from professional society guidelines and ChatGPT version 3.5 was queried, the version that is readily available to the public. The two categories of questions were genetic counseling guidelines and questions pertaining to specific genetic disorders. The answers were scored by two attending Gynecologic Oncologists according to the following scale: 1) correct and comprehensive, 2) correct but not comprehensive, 3) some correct, some incorrect, and 4) completely incorrect. Scoring discrepancies were resolved by additional third reviewer. The proportion of responses earning each score were calculated overall and within each question category., Results: ChatGPT provided correct and comprehensive answers to 33/40 (82.5%) questions, correct but not comprehensive answers to 6/40 (15%) questions, partially incorrect answers to 1/40 (2.5%) questions, and completely incorrect answers to 0/40 (0%) questions. The genetic counseling category of questions had the highest proportion of answers that were both correct and comprehensive with ChatGPT answering all 20/20 questions with 100% accuracy and were comprehensive in responses. ChatGPT performed equally in the specific genetic disorders category, with 88.2% (15/17) and 66.6% (2/3) correct and comprehensive answers to questions pertaining to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome questions respectively., Conclusion: ChatGPT accurately answers questions about genetic syndromes, genetic testing, and counseling in majority of the studied questions. These data suggest this powerful tool can be utilized as a patient resource for genetic counseling questions, though more data input from gynecologic oncologists would be needed to educate patients on genetic syndromes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) are medically actionable and may inform hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) treatment and prevention. However, rates of germline genetic testing (GT) in people with and without cancer are suboptimal. Individuals' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs may influence GT decisions. While genetic counseling (GC) provides decision support, the supply of genetic counselors is insufficient to meet demand. Accordingly, there is a need to explore the evidence on interventions that aim to support BRCA1/2 testing decisions. We conducted a scoping review of PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycINFO using search terms related to HBOC, GT, and decision making. First, we screened records to identify peer-reviewed reports that described interventions to support BRCA1/2 testing decisions. Next, we reviewed full-text reports and excluded studies that lacked statistical comparisons or enrolled previously tested individuals. Finally, we extracted study characteristics and findings into a table. All records and reports were reviewed independently by two authors; decisions were tracked in Rayyan, and discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Of 2116 unique citations, 25 met the eligibility criteria. Articles were published between 1997 and 2021 and described randomized trials and nonrandomized, quasi-experimental studies. Most studies tested technology-based (12/25, 48%) or written (9/25, 36%) interventions. Nearly half (12/25, 48%) of interventions were designed to complement traditional GC. Of the interventions compared to GC, 75% (6/8) increased or had a noninferior effect on knowledge, and 67% (4/6) decreased or had a noninferior effect on decisional conflict. Intervention effects on GT uptake were mixed, which may reflect evolving eligibility criteria for GT. Our findings suggest novel interventions may promote informed GT decision making, but many were developed to complement traditional GC. Trials that assess the effects of decision support interventions in diverse samples and evaluate implementation strategies for efficacious interventions are warranted., (© 2023 National Society of Genetic Counselors.)

Purpose: Germline genetic testing (GT) is important for prostate cancer (PCA) management, clinical trial eligibility, and hereditary cancer risk. However, GT is underutilized and there is a shortage of genetic counselors. To address these gaps, a patient-driven, pretest genetic education webtool was designed and studied compared with traditional genetic counseling (GC) to inform strategies for expanding access to genetic services., Methods: Technology-enhanced acceleration of germline evaluation for therapy (TARGET) was a multicenter, noninferiority, randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04447703) comparing a nine-module patient-driven genetic education webtool versus pretest GC. Participants completed surveys measuring decisional conflict, satisfaction, and attitudes toward GT at baseline, after pretest education/counseling, and after GT result disclosure. The primary end point was noninferiority in reducing decisional conflict between webtool and GC using the validated Decisional Conflict Scale. Mixed-effects regression modeling was used to compare decisional conflict between groups. Participants opting for GT received a 51-gene panel, with results delivered to participants and their providers., Results: The analytic data set includes primary outcome data from 315 participants (GC [n = 162] and webtool [n = 153]). Mean difference in decisional conflict score changes between groups was -0.04 (one-sided 95% CI, -∞ to 2.54; P = .01), suggesting the patient-driven webtool was noninferior to GC. Overall, 145 (89.5%) GC and 120 (78.4%) in the webtool arm underwent GT, with pathogenic variants in 15.8% (8.7% in PCA genes). Satisfaction did not differ significantly between arms; knowledge of cancer genetics was higher but attitudes toward GT were less favorable in the webtool arm., Conclusion: The results of the TARGET study support the use of patient-driven digital webtools for expanding access to pretest genetic education for PCA GT. Further studies to optimize patient experience and evaluate them in diverse patient populations are warranted.

Purpose: Telegenetics has become the predominant mode of cancer genetic counseling during the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to identify potential patient-level contraindicators for telegenetic genetic counseling., Methods: We analyzed post-counseling (pre-result disclosure) follow-up data from a randomized noninferiority trial of a telephone genetic counseling versus usual care genetic counseling. Among 669 randomized participants, 600 completed pre-test counseling and 568 completed a 2-week follow-up assessment before receiving test results. In this analysis, we focused on genetic counseling outcomes (knowledge, decisional conflict, and distress). In multivariate models controlling for bivariate predictors of these outcomes, we tested our a priori hypotheses that pre-counseling numeracy, perceived stress, and race/ethnicity would moderate the outcomes of telephone genetic counseling versus usual care., Results: Only numeracy significantly moderated associations between mode of genetic counseling and outcomes. Higher numeracy was associated with higher post-counseling knowledge following telephone genetic counseling ( p  < 0.001), but not usual care ( p  = 0.450). Higher numeracy was also associated with lower distress following telephone genetic counseling ( p  = 0.009) but not usual care ( p  = 0.16). Neither perceived stress nor race/ethnicity exhibited differential impacts on telephone genetic counseling versus usual care ( p s > 0.20)., Conclusion: Although high numeracy was associated with higher levels of knowledge following telegenetic counseling, we did not identify any clinically significant patient-level contraindicators for telegenetic counseling. These results lend further confidence to the broad use of telegenetics., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Ms Binion, Ms Sorgen, Ms Peshkin, Dr Valdimarsdottir, Ms Nusbaum, Ms DeMarco, Dr Graves, Ms McKinnon, Dr Wood, Ms McCormick, Ms Ladd, and Dr Schwartz declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Dr Judy Garber serves on an advisory board for Helix Genetics, has a leadership role for a trial at AstraZeneca, and receives research support from Ambry Genetics. Dr Claudine Isaacs has consultancies with AstraZeneca, Pfizer and received research support (to institution) from GlaxoSmithKline.

An effective way to reduce emotional distress is by sharing negative emotions with others. This is why counseling with a virtual counselor is an emerging methodology, where the sharer can consult freely anytime and anywhere without having to fear being judged. To improve counseling effectiveness, most studies so far have focused on designing verbal compassion for virtual counselors. However, recent studies showed that virtual counselors' nonverbal compassion through eye contact, facial mimicry, and head-nodding also have significant impact on the overall counseling experience. To verify this, we designed the virtual counselor's nonverbal compassion and examined its effects on counseling effectiveness (i.e., reduce the intensity of anger and improve general affect). A total of 40 participants were recruited from the university community. Participants were then randomly assigned to one of two virtual counselor conditions: a neutral virtual counselor condition without nonverbal compassion and a compassionate virtual counselor condition with nonverbal compassion (i.e., eye contact, facial mimicry, and head-nodding). Participants shared their anger-inducing episodes with the virtual counselor for an average of 16.30 min. Note that the virtual counselor was operated by the Wizard-of-Oz method without actually being technically implemented. Results showed that counseling with a compassionate virtual counselor reduced the intensity of anger significantly more than counseling with a neutral virtual counselor (F(1, 37) = 30.822, p < 0.001, η p 2  = 0.454). In addition, participants who counseled with a compassionate virtual counselor responded that they experienced higher empathy than those who counseled with a neutral virtual counselor (p < 0.001). These findings suggest that nonverbal compassion through eye contact, facial mimicry, and head-nodding of the virtual counselor makes the participants feel more empathy, which contributes to improving the counseling effectiveness by reducing the intensity of anger., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: In the USA, patients who undergo genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk are responsible for informing relatives about their genetic test results, but many relatives never find out they might be at risk. A health system-mediated relative notification program might help fill this gap, but questions remain about the acceptability of this approach., Methods: We analyzed qualitative data from a single-arm, nonrandomized, mixed-methods study to understand how patients and families experienced a new health system-mediated relative notification program. We invited all study participants to participate in semi-structured telephone interviews at 6-8 weeks after return of genetic test results. We used a template analysis approach to thematically analyze interview transcripts., Results: We interviewed 32 participants, including 17 probands and 15 relatives. Relatives reported positive experiences with the notification program, noting they felt in control of decisions and appreciated genetic counselor involvement in communicating the proband's test results. Benefits of direct contact included reduced burden for probands, increased family discussions about health, and notification of relatives who otherwise would not have learned results. No participants reported adverse effects from the program., Conclusion: Overall, the relative notification program was acceptable to participants and supported probands in reaching at-risk relatives who otherwise might not have been notified. These findings could inform the implementation of future genetic risk family notification programs with the potential to improve uptake of cascade testing and advance cancer prevention and early detection efforts., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: Risk-based breast cancer screening aims to address persistent high morbidity and mortality. This study examined the experience of participants in the Women Informed to Screen Depending on Measures of Risk (WISDOM) trial who received a pathogenic variant in one of nine high or moderate penetrance breast cancer genes., Methods: Participants completed a brief survey (n = 181) immediately following the results disclosure and 1 year later. Descriptive statistics were computed and comparisons between participants at different risk levels were performed using Fisher's exact and McNemar's tests. Analysis of qualitative interviews (n = 42) at 2-4 weeks and 6 months post-results disclosure compared responses at the 2 time points and explained and elaborated on the survey data., Results: 66.3% of survey respondents felt very or moderately prepared to receive genomic results. At the T1 survey, 80.7% of participants had shared the genetic result with a blood relative, increasing to 88.4% at T2; providing information and encouraging cascade testing were the most common reasons for sharing. Communication with a blood relative, other healthcare providers beyond the primary care provider, and cascade testing were higher for participants with a high risk than low or moderate risk genomic finding. Qualitative interviews elucidated varied reasons why participants felt (un)prepared for the results, including whether or not they had a family history of breast cancer, and illustrated the complexity of decision-making about sharing results., Conclusions: Although most participants communicated results with family members and healthcare providers in accordance with their risk level, questions remain about how to adequately prepare individuals to receive pathogenic results, ensure timely and accessible follow-up care, and facilitate genetic counseling and cascade testing of at-risk relatives in the setting of population risk-based screening., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Family health history (FHH) is central to human genomic profiling construction; however, there is no protocol for documenting FHH in a pedigree format in Vietnam. Aim: A "Gia Su Suc Khoe" (GSSK) tool was developed to create a user-friendly interface for collecting FHH and offering diseases' risk assessment. Results: A tool was described (https://giasusuckhoe.vn/) with good feedback from genetic counselors and family-medicine doctors. Among 20 surveys, 100% of respondents noted that the report accurately reflected their FHH and were satisfied with the tool's display. About 74% of familial conditions were covered. Overall, all constructive feedback has been adapted into the updated version. Conclusion: Gia Su Suc Khoe has the potential to significantly improve healthcare delivery and outcomes in Vietnam.

Introduction: When a pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation is identified in a family, cascade genetic testing of family members is recommended since the results may inform screening or treatment decisions in men and women. However, rates of cascade testing are low, and men are considerably less likely than women to pursue cascade testing. To facilitate cascade testing in men, we designed a Web-based genetic education tool that addressed barriers to cascade testing, was individually tailored, delivered proactively, and could be used in lieu of pretest genetic counseling to streamline the cascade testing process., Methods: We randomized 63 untested men from hereditary cancer families to Web-based genetic education (WGE) versus enhanced usual care (EUC). WGE participants were provided access to a genetic education website after which they could accept or decline genetic testing or opt for pretest genetic counseling. EUC participants received an informational brochure and a letter informing them of their eligibility for genetic testing and recommending they schedule genetic counseling. The primary outcome was the uptake of genetic testing., Results: Men in the WGE group were more likely to complete genetic counseling and/or genetic testing (43% vs. 12.1%; χ2 [n = 63, df = 1] = 7.77, p = 0.005). WGE participants were also more likely to complete genetic testing compared to men in the EUC group (30% vs. 9.1%; χ2 [n = 63, df = 1] = 4.46, p = 0.03)., Conclusion: This preliminary trial suggests that a streamlined approach to genetic testing using proactively delivered genetic education may reduce barriers to cascade testing for at-risk men, leading to increased uptake. These results should be interpreted cautiously given the select sample and high rate of non-response., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background and Aims: As cell and gene therapy (CGT) has grown in availability and scope, more unapproved regenerative medicine is being marketed to the public. It is essential that health care providers have sufficient knowledge and comfort to determine whether treatments are properly regulated and address these topics with patients. Due to the applicability of CGT to genetic disease, genetic counselors could be key in providing education and answering patients' questions about these topics. However, previous studies have focused only on physicians' knowledge and comfort with CGT and unapproved regenerative medicine. The purpose of this study was to assess genetic counselors' self-reported knowledge and comfort discussing these topics with patients and to explore what factors predict increased knowledge and comfort., Methods: The authors designed an online survey distributed to genetic counselors who were part of the National Society of Genetic Counselors Student Research Program e-mail list. The survey addressed genetic counselors' demographics, practice experience with CGT, education about CGT, knowledge and comfort., Results: The survey was completed by 144 genetic counselors. The best predictor of increased knowledge and comfort was experience discussing CGT in practice. In addition, those who worked at an institution at which CGT trials were offered had greater knowledge and comfort. However, most genetic counselors reported their knowledge was not sufficient to address questions from patients, and most had little-to-no knowledge or comfort determining whether a trial was properly regulated. There was no correlation between education and either knowledge or comfort; however, most participants desired more education about these topics., Conclusions: This study suggests that genetic counselors who (i) have experience with CGT in practice or (ii) work at institutions at which CGT trials are offered may have better knowledge regarding CGT. These results may help identify individuals and/or institutions in whom increasing knowledge regarding CGT could be beneficial. This is crucial as CGT becomes mainstream, leading to more widely marketed unapproved regenerative medicine. Several gaps in knowledge and comfort were identified, including participants' ability to determine whether a treatment is properly regulated. Further research is needed to better characterize the educational needs of genetic counselors surrounding these topics to address these gaps., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no commercial, proprietary or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CF Foundation) recommends the provision of genetic counseling (GC) to help educate families and decrease anxiety around the cystic fibrosis (CF) newborn screening process. Unfortunately, access to genetic counselors is limited, especially for CF trained genetic counselors. We hypothesized that the GC process for families could be improved by utilizing telemedicine to leverage the availability of two dedicated, CF trained genetic counselors to provide access to GC for several CF centers. In addition, we hoped to demonstrate that use of trained CF genetic counselors, delivering GC via telemedicine at the time of sweat testing, would provide families with understanding of CF genetics as well as result in high satisfaction with the newborn screening process., Methods: GC was provided by CF trained genetic counselors via telemedicine at the time of sweat testing. Following the counseling session, families were administered an anonymous written survey to evaluate their impression of the services provided. A subset of 50 families was recruited for an assessment of gained knowledge regarding CF genetics using the Ciske knowledge inventory. Using χ 2  analysis, Ciske knowledge inventory data from our telemedicine GC families was compared to counseled and uncounseled Ciske historical controls. Lastly, in-depth interviews about the newborn screening process for CF were performed with 10 families and interviews were coded for emerging themes., Results: During the 4 years of the study, 250 patients received GC. Overall comfort with the counseling rated 4.77 out of 5 using a Likert scale. After counseling by telemedicine, parents demonstrated improved understanding of the genetic implications of an abnormal CF newborn screen for their family, with 100% of families understanding that their child was a carrier for CF as compared to 97.2% of counseled (p = .023) and 78.5% of uncounseled (p = .0007) from Ciske historical controls. The study group also showed improvement in understanding of both parents possibly being carriers, with an 87.7% correct response rate compared to a 37.0% correct response rate in the counseled group (p < .0001) and a 35.4% correct response rate in the non-counseled group (p < .0001) from Ciske historical controls. Subgroup analysis at one site showed a significant increase in the number of infants with completed sweat tests from previous years (49% in 2013 vs. 80% in 2017 during the study, p < .0001)., Conclusions: GC by telemedicine was well received by families and demonstrated improved family knowledge acquisition and understanding of CF as it related to risks for their child as well as identification of risks for other family members. Furthermore, in addition to an increase is those receiving GC, a subgroup analysis demonstrated a significant increase in the number of infants receiving sweat tests. This study demonstrates that GC via telemedicine for CF is feasible and demonstrates improvement in parent understanding of CF genetics. Furthermore, this method can be implemented effectively across a wide geographical area with a limited number of CF trained genetic counselors to improve access to care for patients and families., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Opportunities for genetic counselors to work in the laboratory have grown exponentially, yet the professional development needed to serve in these roles had not been previously explored. This study aimed to identify competencies required for entry-level genetic counselors working in the laboratory, explore the perceived level of preparation of these competencies as noted by experts in the laboratories, and assess the perceived value of additional credentialing for genetic counselors practicing in these settings. Twenty genetic counselors working in the laboratory setting and five MD or PhD laboratory managers, identified through purposeful and snowball sampling and with at least 5 years of experience working in a laboratory, were interviewed using a semi-structured protocol. Transcripts were analyzed thematically using deductive and inductive coding. Key findings included the distinction of laboratory and industry roles as involving nondirect patient care and differing from genetic counseling roles in the clinical setting. Genetic counselors working in the laboratory feel well prepared to transition into this setting and provide a unique patient-focused perspective to laboratory roles, including variant interpretation, marketing, and product development. Practice-based competencies (PBCs) were translatable to those used in the laboratory, yet variant interpretation, limitations of genomics-based tests, and the business of health care were noted as important to these roles but not fully addressed in the PBCs. Additional skills were often developed through on-the-job training and interdisciplinary collaboration, but more exposure to diverse roles in genetic counseling programs' didactic and field training was recommended. The majority felt that requiring an additional post-master's credential to work in the laboratory setting may restrict movement into these roles. Several questioned their identity as genetic counselors as they were no longer providing direct patient care and/or had been dissuaded by others from pursuing a laboratory position. Research focused on professional identity among genetic counselors working in nondirect patient care roles is warranted., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Genetic Counseling published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of National Society of Genetic Counselors.)

The genetic counseling (GC) community has faced criticism about the duality of promoting patient autonomy while also advocating for individuals with disabilities. This study assessed the attitudes of the disability community and GCs to identify content that should be included in GC disability education and evaluate the landscape of GC disability education. Members of the disability community and GCs completed an electronic survey distributed through electronic listservs and partnering organizations. A total of 672 responses were analyzed from both the disability community (n = 596) and the GC community (n = 76). Members of the disability community noted differences in GC comfort level discussing different aspects of disability with GCs being perceived as being very knowledgeable about medical aspects 71% of the time versus 49% of the time when discussing social/lifestyle aspects of disability. This discordance was reflected in GCs reported comfort level in discussing medical aspects (89%) and social aspects of disability (65%) during a session. Most GC respondents (71%) felt they received adequate knowledge during their disability education and variation was reported in the execution of disability education by training programs. Disability education content recommendations from the disability community and GCs included emphasizing four key aspects of disability: medical, social/lifestyle, lived experience, and the disability rights movement. Respondents of both cohorts stressed the inclusion of and exposure to persons with disabilities in disability education to understand the lived experience of persons with disabilities. The disability community identified additional disability education content to be included such as empathy training, family hardships, and mental health. The results of this study have practice implications and provide a foundation for training expectations to ensure future GCs possess the necessary skills to improve the quality of services provided to families and persons with disabilities., (© 2023 National Society of Genetic Counselors.)

Objectives: Hemoglobinopathies are the commonest inherited blood disorders and form a serious burden worldwide, affecting communities, patient quality of life and healthcare resources. The Kingdom of Bahrain has issued a law obligating couples to undergo premarital screening to detect those at risk of having children affected with these disorders. The aim of this study was to analyze the marital decisions of couples at risk for hemoglobinopathies and follow up the outcomes., Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on couples at risk for hemoglobinopathies identified during the premarital screening program at local health centers in the Kingdom of Bahrain and referred to the genetics department in the Salmaniya Medical Complex for genetic counselling in 2018-2020., Results: A total of 189 couples were found to be at risk for hemoglobinopathies, of whom 159 completed the survey. Of these, 107 (67%) decided to proceed with their marriage and 26 couples achieved pregnancy. Out of 24 at-risk pregnancies with known outcome, 83.3% were spontaneous whereas only 16.7% underwent in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). Eight out of 20 infants born to couples after spontaneous conception were affected. A positive attitude toward IVF with PGD was held by 60% of at-risk couples., Conclusions: Despite undergoing premarital screening and genetic counselling, a large percentage of at-risk couples proceeded with their marriage. Most of them justified their decision due to the availability of advanced methods that aid in the prevention of having an affected child. However, the cost of such intervention was a major barrier for the majority of couples., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Importance: Requiring personalized genetic counseling may introduce barriers to cancer risk assessment, but it is unknown whether omitting counseling could increase distress., Objective: To assess whether omitting pretest and/or posttest genetic counseling would increase distress during remote testing., Design, Setting, and Participants: Making Genetic Testing Accessible (MAGENTA) was a 4-arm, randomized noninferiority trial testing the effects of individualized pretest and/or posttest genetic counseling on participant distress 3 and 12 months posttest. Participants were recruited via social and traditional media, and enrollment occurred between April 27, 2017, and September 29, 2020. Participants were women aged 30 years or older, English-speaking, US residents, and had access to the internet and a health care professional. Previous cancer genetic testing or counseling was exclusionary. In the family history cohort, participants had a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer. In the familial pathogenic variant (PV) cohort, participants reported 1 biological relative with a PV in an actionable cancer susceptibility gene. Data analysis was performed between December 13, 2020, and May 31, 2023., Intervention: Participants completed baseline questionnaires, watched an educational video, and were randomized to 1 of 4 arms: the control arm with pretest and/or posttest genetic counseling, or 1 of 3 study arms without pretest and posttest counseling. Genetic counseling was provided by phone appointments and testing was done using home-delivered saliva kits., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was participant distress measured by the Impact of Event Scale 3 months after receiving the results. Secondary outcomes included completion of testing, anxiety, depression, and decisional regret., Results: A total of 3839 women (median age, 44 years [range 22-91 years]), most of whom were non-Hispanic White and college educated, were randomized, 3125 in the family history and 714 in the familial PV cohorts. In the primary analysis in the family history cohort, all experimental arms were noninferior for distress at 3 months. There were no statistically significant differences in anxiety, depression, or decisional regret at 3 months. The highest completion rates were seen in the 2 arms without pretest counseling., Conclusions and Relevance: In the MAGENTA clinical trial, omitting individualized pretest counseling for all participants and posttest counseling for those without PV during remote genetic testing was not inferior with regard to posttest distress, providing an alternative care model for genetic risk assessment., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02993068.

Purpose: Germline genetic testing (GT) is recommended for men with prostate cancer (PC), but testing through traditional models is limited. The ProGen study examined a novel model aimed at providing access to GT while promoting education and informed consent., Methods: Men with potentially lethal PC (metastatic, localized with a Gleason score of ≥8, persistent prostate-specific antigen after local therapy), diagnosis age ≤55 years, previous malignancy, and family history suggestive of a pathogenic variant (PV) and/or at oncologist's discretion were randomly assigned 3:1 to video education (VE) or in-person genetic counseling (GC). Participants had 67 genes analyzed (Ambry), with results disclosed via telephone by a genetic counselor. Outcomes included GT consent, GT completion, PV prevalence, and survey measures of satisfaction, psychological impact, genetics knowledge, and family communication. Two-sided Fisher's exact tests were used for between-arm comparisons., Results: Over a 2-year period, 662 participants at three sites were randomly assigned and pretest VE (n = 498) or GC (n = 164) was completed by 604 participants (VE, 93.1%; GC, 88.8%), of whom 596 participants (VE, 98.9%; GC, 97.9%) consented to GT and 591 participants completed GT (VE, 99.3%; GC, 98.6%). These differences were not statistically significant although subtle differences in satisfaction and psychological impact were. Notably, 84 PVs were identified in 78 participants (13.2%), with BRCA1/2 PV comprising 32% of participants with a positive result ( BRCA2 n = 21, BRCA1 n = 4)., Conclusion: Both VE and traditional GC yielded high GT uptake without significant differences in outcome measures of completion, GT uptake, genetics knowledge, and family communication. The increased demand for GT with limited genetics resources supports consideration of pretest VE for patients with PC.

Background: Genetic counseling and testing have an important role in the care of patients at elevated risk for breast cancer. However, conventional pre- and post-test genetic counseling is labor and time intensive, less accessible for patients living outside major urban centers, and impractical on a large scale. A patient-driven approach to genetic counseling and testing may increase access, improve patients' experiences, affect efficiency of clinical practice, and help meet workforce demand. The objective of this 2-arm randomized controlled trial is to determine the efficacy of Know Your Risk (KYR), a genetic counseling patient preference intervention., Methods: Females (n = 1000) at elevated risk (>20% lifetime) for breast cancer will be randomized to the KYR intervention or conventional genetic counseling. The study will provide comprehensive assessment of breast cancer risk by multigene panel testing and validated polygenic risk score. Primary outcome is adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for a clinical encounter every 6-12 months and an annual mammogram (breast MRI if recommended) determined by medical record review. Secondary outcomes include adherence to other recommended cancer screening tests determined by medical record review and changes in breast cancer knowledge, perception of risk, post-test/counseling distress, and satisfaction with counseling by completion of three surveys during the study. Study aims will be evaluated for non-inferiority of the KYR intervention compared to conventional genetic counseling., Conclusion: If efficacious, the KYR intervention has the potential to improve patients' experience and may change how genetic counseling is delivered, inform best practices, and reduce workforce burden., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.govNCT05325151., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and impact of offering genetic testing and counseling to patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), with the potential to enroll in gene-targeted clinical trials and improve clinical care., Methods: A multicenter, exploratory pilot study at 7 academic hospital sites in the United States tracked enrollment and randomized participants to receive results and genetic counseling at local sites or by genetic counselors, remotely. Follow-up surveys measured participant/provider satisfaction, knowledge, and psychological impact., Results: From September 5, 2019 to January 4, 2021, 620 participants were enrolled and 387 completed outcome surveys. There were no significant differences in outcomes between local and remote sites, with both arms reporting high knowledge and satisfaction scores (>80%). Notably, 16% of those tested had reportable PD gene variants (pathogenic/likely pathogenic/risk allele)., Conclusion: Local clinicians, as well as genetic counselors, with educational support as needed, can effectively return genetic results for PD as we observed favorable outcome measures in both groups. Increasing access to PD genetic testing and counseling is urgent; this can inform future efforts to integrate genetic testing and counseling into clinical care for all those with PD., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Lola Cook received partial funding of salaries from the Michael J. Fox Foundation (MJFF) and Parkinson’s Foundation; Jennifer Verbrugge received partial funding of salaries from the Michael J. Fox Foundation (MJFF) and Parkinson’s Foundation and received travel funding for Movement Disorders Society International Congress, Madrid, Spain September 2022, abstract and poster presentation PD GENEration Clinical Phase: Genetic Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Characteristics by the Parkinson’s Foundation and paid to Indiana University School of Medicine; Tae-Hwi Schwantes-An, no disclosures; Jeanine Schulze received partial funding of salaries from the MJFF and Parkinson’s Foundation; James C. Beck is employed by the Parkinson’s Foundation, and receives funding for grants through their institution from NIH; Anna Naito is employed by the Parkinson’s Foundation; Anne Hall is a research advocate and received funding of grants from Parkinson’s Foundation for acting as a Steering Committee Member; Amanda K. Chan, no disclosures; Cynthia J. Casaceli, no disclosures; Karen Marder received funding of grants from Parkinson’s Foundation for acting as a Steering Committee Member, receives funding of grants from NIH, MJ FOX, CHDI, HSG, HDSA, Prilenia, Novartis, Roche, Springer, receives consulting fees from Novartis, and receives funding for leadership on Enroll HD Oversight Committee (CHDI) and HSG steering committee; Martha Nance received funding of grants from Parkinson’s Foundation for acting as a Steering Committee Member, received payment for presentation at Parkinson’s Foundation and Parkinson Study Group conferences, received support for attending Parkinson Study Group conference, and is the Chair of Genetics and Environment Working Group for Parkinson Study Group; Michael A. Schwarzschild received funding of grants from Parkinson’s Foundation for acting as a Steering Committee Member, receives funding of grants or conference support from NIH, MJFF, Farmer Family Foundation, Sergey Brin Family Foundation, American Parkinson’s Disease Association, Cure Parkinson’s, Parkinson’s Foundation, Harvard School of Public Health (NIH, DoD), GSK, GE Healthcare, receives consulting fees through Parkinson Study Group for PSG advisory services (including to Bial, Biogen [LUMA/LIGHTHOUSE trials global SC], UCB [ORHCESTRA trial PSG SC]) and through Sutter Health (NIA), Northwestern Univ (NINDS), Cure Parkinson’s for Steering Committee services (for TOPAZ and SPARX3), International Linked Clinical Trial Committee (CP), participates on an Alzheimer’s drug trial Data Monitoring Committee services for Eli Lilly & Co., and is Chair, Exec. Committee for Parkinson Study Group; Tanya Simuni received funding of grants from Parkinson’s Foundation for acting as a Steering Committee Member, receives funding of manuscript by MJFF for Parkinson’s Research, receives funding of grants by Amneal, Biogen, Roche, Neuroderm, Sanofi, Prevail and UCB, is an investigator for NINDS, MJFF, Parkinson’s Foundation studies, receives consulting fees from 4D Pharma, Acadia, AcureX, AskBio, Amneal, Blue Rock Therapeutics, Caraway Therapeutics, Critical Path for Parkinson's Consortium (CPP), Denali, MJFF, Neuroderm, Sanofi, Sinopia, Sunovion, Roche, Takeda, UCB, Vanqua Bio and Voyager, and is on the advisory board for Acadia, AcureX, AskBio, Amneal, Denali, Sunovion, Roche, and on the Scientific Advisory Board for 4D Pharma, Neuroderm, Sanofi and UCB; Anne-Marie Wills received funding of grants from Parkinson’s Foundation for acting as a Steering Committee Member, and receives funding of grants by NIA/NIH, Roche/Genentech, Biogen, and their institution participates on Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Ono Pharmaceuticals and Amylyx Pharmaceuticals; Roy N. Alcalay received funding of grants from Parkinson’s Foundation for acting as a Steering Committee Member, receives funding from NIH, Department of Defense, MJFF, the Silverstein Foundation for GBA/PD and received consulting fees from Sanofi, Ono Therapeutics, Avrobio, Takeda, Gain Therapeutics, Merck, GSK, Caraway., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Availability and accessibility of preconception and prenatal genetic carrier and newborn biochemical and genetic screening have grown exponentially over the past 2 decades and as such, it is challenging for clinicians to keep pace. Although genetic counseling or genetic consultation should be offered to all expectant and new parents for prenatal screening decisions and positive results, benefits and limitations of these tests and results must be known and familiar to perinatal and pediatric clinicians. A brief historical overview of Dor Yeshorim, preconception and prenatal expanded carrier, and newborn screening is presented, followed by discussion about the conditions screened and considerations surrounding the benefits and limitations of these tests in the practice setting., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cardiac genetic counseling is the process of helping individuals adapt to a personal diagnosis or family history of an inherited heart condition. The process is shown to benefit patients and includes specialized skills, such as counseling children and interpreting complex genetic results. Emerging areas include: evolving service delivery models for caring for patients and communicating risk to relatives, new areas of need including postmortem molecular autopsy, and new populations of individuals found to carry a likely pathogenic/pathogenic cardiac variant identified through genomic screening. This article provides an overview of the cardiac genetic counseling process and evolving areas in the field., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Difficult news has been described as any news that adversely and seriously affects an individual's view of their future. Research in oncology genetic counseling demonstrated that individuals do not prefer in-person or telephone delivery of their genetic test results. However, in the prenatal setting, there is limited research examining how patients prefer news related to their pregnancies be disclosed. This study aimed to assess the experiences and preferences of prenatal patients who received difficult news by telephone. A semi-structured interview guide was developed to assess patients' personal definitions of difficult news and their experiences receiving the news by telephone. Fifteen patients seen prenatally by a genetic counselor were interviewed. Interviews were transcribed and consensus-coded, using inductive content analysis to identify several themes. The most common definition of difficult news included unexpected, life-changing, or devastating information. Participants described aspects of their experience and strategies employed by their genetic counselor that was helpful when receiving the news, which was found to align with the SPIKES protocol, a six-step process of delivering difficult news to patients. Additional techniques that participants identified as beneficial and satisfactory included the genetic counselor's use of empathy, non-directiveness, and continuity and coordination of care. Participants also provided recommendations for improvement, including a discussion of the mode of result disclosure during pretest counseling, an option to follow up with their genetic counselor, personalized resources, and a summary of the results call. The findings of this study demonstrate that a patient-centered approach is preferred by patients who receive difficult news by telephone in the prenatal setting. Patients' identification of beneficial communication techniques and suggestions for improvement can be implemented by any healthcare provider responsible for delivering difficult news to prenatal patients., (© 2023 National Society of Genetic Counselors.)

With the advance of genetic technologies, the use of expanded carrier screening (ECS) in the prenatal setting is growing. ECS tests for a wide range of inherited genetic disorders regardless of racial/ethnic background and family history. Latinxs are an important ECS stakeholder group as they are the largest minority group with the highest fertility rate in the United States. Yet, the Latinx population has, to date, been underrepresented and understudied in genetics/genomics research. We conducted a study to explore the knowledge and perspectives of pregnant Latinas regarding ECS in which descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to analyze the data. Thirty-two pregnant Latinas - mostly of low educational levels (no education beyond high school) and with less than $20,000 annual household income living in rural areas were surveyed, provided with education about ECS, and interviewed. Participants were found to possess limited knowledge about ECS prior to being interviewed. Most (68.8%), however, expressed interest in pursuing ECS following the educational component that explained ECS. Their interest was mainly driven by the desire to know their baby's chance of developing a genetic disorder, the low risk of ECS procedures for both pregnant Latinas and their fetus, and the opportunity to better prepare for raising a child with a genetic condition. Our findings contribute to the limited research in the genetics/genomics field by providing in-depth insights into the perspectives of pregnant Latinas regarding ECS. Obstetric providers and genetic counselors should provide culturally appropriate education and counseling to empower pregnant Latinas to make informed decisions about the use of ECS., (© 2023 National Society of Genetic Counselors.)