1. Screening archaeological bone for palaeogenetic and palaeoproteomic studies
- Author
-
Victoria E. Mullin, Christina Papageorgopoulou, Matthew D. Teasdale, Henrik B. Hansen, Birgit Gehlen, Joachim Burger, Ashot Margaryan, Adamantios Sampson, Laura Winkelbach, Niels Lynnerup, Kirsty Penkman, Daniel G. Bradley, Amelie Scheu, Morten E. Allentoft, Martina Unterländer, Ioannis Liritzis, Matthew J. Collins, Ioannis Kontopoulos, Martin Street, Susanne Kreutzer, Kontopoulos, Ioannis [0000-0001-5591-8917], Kreutzer, Susanne [0000-0001-6286-534X], Gehlen, Birgit [0000-0003-1345-8072], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
- Subjects
Proteomics ,Social Sciences ,Marine and Aquatic Sciences ,01 natural sciences ,Biochemistry ,Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared ,Limnology ,Screening method ,0303 health sciences ,Multidisciplinary ,Ancient DNA ,Chemistry ,Fossils ,FOS: Social sciences ,Nucleic acids ,Archaeology ,Attenuated total reflection ,Medicine ,Physical Anthropology ,Organic content ,Research Article ,010506 paleontology ,Science ,Infrared spectroscopy ,Paleoenvironments ,Bone and Bones ,03 medical and health sciences ,Paleoanthropology ,Genetics ,Animals ,Humans ,Paleolimnology ,DNA, Ancient ,Paleozoology ,030304 developmental biology ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Ecology and Environmental Sciences ,Biology and Life Sciences ,Proteins ,Paleontology ,DNA ,Earth sciences ,Anthropology ,Paleobiology ,Paleogenetics ,Collagens - Abstract
Funder: FP7 Ideas: European Research Council; funder-id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100011199; Grant(s): 295729, The recovery and analysis of ancient DNA and protein from archaeological bone is time-consuming and expensive to carry out, while it involves the partial or complete destruction of valuable or rare specimens. The fields of palaeogenetic and palaeoproteomic research would benefit greatly from techniques that can assess the molecular quality prior to sampling. To be relevant, such screening methods should be effective, minimally-destructive, and rapid. This study reports results based on spectroscopic (Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy in attenuated total reflectance [FTIR-ATR]; n = 266), palaeoproteomic (collagen content; n = 226), and palaeogenetic (endogenous DNA content; n = 88) techniques. We establish thresholds for three different FTIR indices, a) the infrared splitting factor [IRSF] that assesses relative changes in bioapatite crystals’ size and homogeneity; b) the carbonate-to-phosphate [C/P] ratio as a relative measure of carbonate content in bioapatite crystals; and c) the amide-to-phosphate ratio [Am/P] for assessing the relative organic content preserved in bone. These thresholds are both extremely reliable and easy to apply for the successful and rapid distinction between well- and poorly-preserved specimens. This is a milestone for choosing appropriate samples prior to genomic and collagen analyses, with important implications for biomolecular archaeology and palaeontology.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF