Search

Abstract Background The Friedewald formula (LDL-F) for the estimation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations is the most often used formula in clinical trials and clinical practice. However, much concern has been raised as to whether this formula is applicable in all patient populations such as the presence of chylomicronaemia and/or hypertriglyceridaemia. The aim of the present study was to evaluate various LDL cholesterol calculation formulas as well as LDL cholesterol levels provided by the Lipoprint LDL System (LDL-L) in patients with the metabolic syndrome (MetSyn). Results LDL-F showed significant differences from other formulas in the total cohort, as well as in MetSyn individuals. This was not the case in nonMetSyn subjects, where LDL-F did not differ with other formulas, with the exception of one formula (LDL by Planella, LDL-P). The bias between LDL-F and other LDL estimation formulas were significantly higher in MetSyn subjects compared to nonMetSyn individuals, except for LDL-L which produced similar bias with LDL-F in both study groups. Conclusion LDL-F seems to exhibit some limitations as far as the calculation of LDL-C levels in patients with the MetSyn is concerned. LDL-L might be more accurate in MetSyn subjects, but so far its use is limited for the estimation of small, dense LDL (sdLDL) cholesterol levels and mean LDL particle size for research purposes only.

The renoprotective effect of statins has been recently disputed because of observations of proteinuria associated with rosuvastatin treatment, the newest drug of the class. Statin-induced proteinuria findings were mainly based [...]

Objectives: To determine the correlation between cardiovascular risk calculated using the Framingham equation and the circulating levels of 4 'emerging'predictors of vascular events: fibrinogen (Fib), lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), albumin (Alb) and bilirubin (Bil) (F-L-A-B)., Patients and Methods: A retrospective survey was carried out using patients referred to a specialist university-based clinic. A total of 376 patients with primary dyslipidaemia (209 men), without overt vascular disease, had their cardiovascular risk estimated using the Framingham equation., Results: Among the men, smokers (n=45) were significantly younger (p =0.014) than non-smokers (n=164). Smokers when compared with non-smokers had significantly higher median Fib levels (3.84 (1.15-5.87) vs. 3.08 (1.44-5.47) g/l; p<0.0001) and lower median Bil levels (8 (3-17) vs. 10 (1-28) micromol/l; p=0.016). When non-smoker men without clinically evident vascular disease were considered, there was a significant positive Fib and negative Alb correlation with calculated risk, whether the family history was considered or not. Moreover in smokers, the only significant correlation was a negative one between Bil and cardiovascular disease risk. Lp(a) correlated with risk for stroke in women non-smokers whether the family history was considered or not, while Alb correlated with risk for stroke in women non-smokers without family history., Conclusion: Fib, Lp(a), Alb and Bil (F-L-A-B) may be predictors of vascular events in high-risk populations. Prospective studies should evaluate whether the F-L-A-B markers are useful in the assessment of cardiovascular risk load. Such an advantage would make treatment more cost effective by improving patient targeting. The F-L-A-B markers could eventually become targets for new drugs.

The renoprotective effect of statins has been recently disputed because of observations of proteinuria associated with rosuvastatin treatment, the newest drug of the class. Statin-induced proteinuria findings were mainly based on crudely quantitative dipstick assays. The authors quantitatively evaluated the effect of rosuvastatin at the recommended starting dose of 10 mg/d, on urine protein excretion in patients with primary dyslipidemia. Serum lipid and nonlipid parameters as well as urinary electrolyte, creatinine, and protein (total, albumin, immunoglobulin G, and alpha-1 microglobulin) levels were measured in 40 patients treated with rosuvastatin and 30 controls at baseline and after 12 weeks. The protein-to-creatinine ratios were used to assess urinary protein excretion. Rosuvastatin improved the lipid profile, produced no deterioration of kidney function, but induced a small but significant increase in the excretion of alpha-1 microglobulin (by 16%, P < .05) indicating that statin-related proteinuria involves low-molecular-weight proteins and is of proximal tubular origin.

Objectives: In a 24-week, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study, we compared the efficacy and metabolic effects, beyond low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering, of atorvastatin (ATV) and rosuvastatin (RSV) in cardiovascular disease-free subjects with primary hyperlipidaemia, treated to an LDL-C target (130 mg/dL)., Methods: After a 6-week dietary lead-in period, patients were randomized to RSV 10 mg/day (n = 60) or ATV 20 mg/day (n = 60). After 6 weeks on treatment the dose of the statin was increased (to RSV 20 mg/day or ATV 40 mg/day) if the treatment goal was not achieved. A control group of healthy volunteers (n = 60) was also included for the validation of baseline serum and urinary laboratory parameters. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients reaching the LDL-C goal; secondary outcomes were changes in lipid and non-lipid metabolic parameters., Results: A total of 45 patients (75.0%) in the RSV-treated group and 43 (71.7%) in the ATV-treated group achieved the treatment target at the initial dose. Both regimens were generally well tolerated and there were no withdrawals due to treatment-related serious adverse events. Similar significant reductions in total cholesterol, LDL-C, apolipoprotein (apo) B, triglycerides, apoB/apoA1 ratio, fibrinogen and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels were seen. RSV had a significant high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)-raising effect and showed a trend towards increasing apoA1 levels. Glycaemic control and renal function parameters were not influenced by statin therapy. ATV, but not RSV, showed a significant hypouricaemic effect., Conclusions: RSV and ATV were equally efficacious in achieving LDL-C treatment goals in patients with primary hyperlipidaemia at the initial dose and following dose titration. RSV seems to have a significantly higher HDL-C-raising effect, while ATV lowers serum uric acid levels.