Anna Bal-Price, J.G.M. Bessems, Hannu Komulainen, Susan P. Felter, Klaus Ejner Andersen, Emanuela Testai, Greet Schoeters, Aldert H. Piersma, George P. Daston, Valérie Zuang, Vera Rogiers, Gavin Maxwell, Ursula Gundert-Remy, David A. Basketter, Ulrike Bernauer, Mathieu Vinken, Ian Kimber, Aynur O. Aptula, Mark T. D. Cronin, Emilio Benfenati, Stuart Creton, George Loizou, Elise Grignard, Esther Brandon, Alexandre Angers-Loustau, Albrecht Poth, Joost H.M. van Delft, Michael Schwarz, Sofia B. Leite, Sarah Adler, Jan van Benthem, Pascal Phrakonkham, Jos C. S. Kleinjans, Sandra Coecke, Sharon Munn, Joachim Kreysa, Wolfgang Dekant, Silvia Casati, Guillermo Repetto, Henk Van Loveren, Reinhard Kreiling, Thomas H. Broschard, Susanne Bremer, Olavi Pelkonen, Stefan Pfuhler, Alan R. Boobis, Paolo Mazzatorta, Pilar Prieto, Andrew Worth, Jose-Manuel Zaldivar, Hanna Tähti, Raffaella Corvi, Tuula Heinonen, Frédéric Y. Bois, Rositsa Serafimova, Toxicogenomics, RS: GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Toxicology, Dermato-cosmetology and Pharmacognosy, and Experimental in vitro toxicology and dermato-cosmetology
The 7th amendment to the EU Cosmetics Directive prohibits to put animal-tested cosmetics on the market in Europe after 2013. In that context, the European Commission invited stakeholder bodies (industry, non-governmental organisations, EU Member States, and the Commissions Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety) to identify scientific experts in five toxicological areas, i.e. toxicokinetics, repeated dose toxicity, carcinogenicity, skin sensitisation, and reproductive toxicity for which the Directive foresees that the 2013 deadline could be further extended in case alternative and validated methods would not be available in time. The selected experts were asked to analyse the status and prospects of alternative methods and to provide a scientifically sound estimate of the time necessary to achieve full replacement of animal testing. In summary, the experts confirmed that it will take at least another 79 years for the replacement of the current in vivo animal tests used for the safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients for skin sensitisation. However, the experts were also of the opinion that alternative methods may be able to give hazard information, i.e. to differentiate between sensitisers and non-sensitisers, ahead of 2017. This would, however, not provide the complete picture of what is a safe exposure because the relative potency of a sensitiser would not be known. For toxicokinetics, the timeframe was 57 years to develop the models still lacking to predict lung absorption and renal/biliary excretion, and even longer to integrate the methods to fully replace the animal toxicokinetic models. For the systemic toxicological endpoints of repeated dose toxicity, carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity, the time horizon for full replacement could not be estimated.