Search

Background: Severe maternal morbidity is a composite measure of serious obstetric complications that is often identified in administrative data using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnosis and procedure codes for a set of 21 indicators. Prior studies of screen-positive cases have demonstrated low predictive value for ICD codes relative to the medical record. To our knowledge, the validity of ICD-10 codes for identifying severe maternal morbidity has not been fully described. Methods: We estimated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ICD-10 codes for severe maternal morbidity occurring at delivery, compared with medical record abstraction (gold standard), for 1,000 deliveries that took place during 2016–2018 at a large, public hospital. Results: We identified a total of 67 cases of severe maternal morbidity using the ICD-10 definition and 74 cases in the medical record. The sensitivity was 26% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 16%, 37%), the positive predictive value was 28% (95% CI = 18%, 41%), the specificity was 95% (95% CI = 93%, 96%), and the negative predictive value was 94% (95% CI = 92%, 96%). Conclusions: The validity of ICD-10 codes for severe maternal morbidity in our high-burden population was poor, suggesting considerable potential for bias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Racial disparities in healthcare have been well documented in the United States. We hypothesise that there will be a racial variance in different clinical variables in single-ventricle patients through stages of palliation., Materials and Methods: Retrospective single-centre study stratified all single-ventricle patients who reached stage 2 palliation by race: Black and White. Other races were excluded. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared, alongside follow-up survival data. Primary outcomes were progression to Fontan and overall survival., Results: Among 526 patients, 325 (61.8%) were White, and 201 (38.2%) were Black. Median age at stage 2 palliation was 150 days for White and 165 for Black patients ( p = 0.005), with similar weights. Black patients exhibited higher median cardiopulmonary bypass times (87 vs. 74 minutes, p = 0.001) and a greater frequency of genetic syndromes (30.1% vs. 22.1%, p = 0.044). No significant differences were observed in outcomes between groups from stage 2 to stage 3, pre-stage 3 cardiac catheterisation variables, or perioperative outcomes. Multivariable regression analysis identified hypoplastic pulmonary arteries as the risk factor for mortality after stage 2. Survival analysis showed no difference in survival by race; however, occurrence of combined cardiovascular event was significantly higher in Black race., Conclusions: Significant racial disparities exist among single-ventricle patients regarding the timing of stage 2 palliation, cardiopulmonary bypass duration, and frequency of genetic syndromes. Black race was a risk factor for sub-optimal long-term outcome, although perioperative mortality was similar. These race-related factors warrant further studies to improve our understanding of the impact of race on outcomes.

Objective: To estimate uptake of influenza, tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap), and COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy and describe vaccine attitudes and beliefs among predominantly racial and ethnic minority individuals delivering at a publicly funded hospital., Methods: We collected survey and electronic medical record data for English-speaking postpartum individuals who delivered a live-born infant from July 7, 2022, through August 21, 2022, and agreed to participate in our study. The 58-item survey included questions about general vaccine attitudes and beliefs as well as vaccine-specific questions. We calculated rates of influenza, Tdap, and COVID-19 vaccinations and compared distributions of survey responses by number (no vaccines, one vaccine, or two or three of the recommended vaccines) and type of vaccines received during pregnancy., Results: Of the 231 eligible individuals, 125 (54.1%) agreed to participate. Rates of influenza, Tdap, and COVID-19 vaccination were 18.4%, 48.0%, and 5.6% respectively. A total of 61 (48.8%) did not receive any recommended vaccines during pregnancy, 40 (32.0%) received one vaccine, and 24 (19.0%) received two or three vaccines. Approximately 66.1% of the no vaccine group, 81.6% of the one vaccine group, and 87.5% of the two or three vaccine group strongly agreed or agreed that they trusted the vaccine information provided by their obstetrician or midwife. While most (>69.2%) agreed that the vaccine-preventable diseases were dangerous for pregnant women, only 24.0%, 29.3%, and 40.3% agreed that they were worried about getting influenza, whooping cough, or COVID-19, respectively, while pregnant., Discussion: Vaccine uptake in our population was low and may be due, in part, to low perceived susceptibility to vaccine-preventable diseases. Obstetricians and midwives were trusted sources of vaccine information, suggesting that enhanced communication strategies could be critical for addressing maternal vaccine hesitancy, particularly in communities of color justifiably affected by medical mistrust., Competing Interests: No competing financial interests exist., (© Sheree L. Boulet et al., 2023; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.)