Search

Background: The Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA) has approved the subcutaneous (SC) administration of infliximab, presenting a more convenient alternative with reduced outpatient visits and diminished expenses compared to the intravenous (IV) administration. However, the financial implications of this formulation have not been examined from the perspective of Saudi payers., Methods and Materials: A prevalence-based budget impact model was developed to evaluate the financial effects of introducing "environment without" versus "with infliximab SC." The model's time horizon spanned over 2 years (2021-2023), aligning with the biennial national pharmaceutical procurement cycle. The comparison focused on infliximab SC versus all available formulations of infliximab IV in the Saudi market for two inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD): Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD). Treatment comparators' comparability and dose escalations were substantiated by published studies, utilizing dosing information from the summary of product characteristics. Drug acquisition costs were derived from SFDA registered prices, with IV formulation administration costs included. Scenario analysis assessed the budget impact of infliximab SC introduction at uptake rates ranging from 0% to 100%., Results: Introducing infliximab SC demonstrated cost-saving potential in the treatment of IBD. At 100% uptake with UC patients for 2 years, infliximab SC resulted in savings of -SAR-31.9 million (-SAR29,145 per patient). Similarly, for CD, introducing infliximab SC at 100% uptake over 2 years yielded savings of -SAR106.2 million (-SAR36,585 per patient)., Conclusion: This study reveals that infliximab SC is associated with cost-saving potential when compared to infliximab IV formulations available in Saudi Arabia. Future research should address uncertainties related to real-world comparative effectiveness, the convenience of administration, patient tolerability, and physician acceptance of the SC formulation of infliximab, alongside comparisons with other TNF-alpha inhibitors., Competing Interests: N Alkhatib holds equity in Pi Pharma Intelligence, LLC, which provides health technology solutions, scientific and consulting services to biopharmaceutical, diagnostics, and medical device companies on a nonexclusivity basis. By the company internal policy, owners, employees, and associates are prohibited from holding equity in client and sponsor organizations or contracting independently with client and sponsor organizations or receiving compensation independently from such organizations. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: © 2024 Alkhatib et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Objective: In patients with Crohn's disease (CD) on combination therapy (infliximab and immunosuppressant) and stopping infliximab (cohort from the study of infliximab diSconTinuation in CrOhn's disease patients in stable Remission on combined therapy with Immunosuppressors (STORI)), the risk of short-term (≤6 months) and mid/long-term relapse (>6 months) was associated with distinct blood protein profiles. Our aim was to test the external validity of this finding in the SPARE cohort (A proSpective Randomized Controlled Trial comParing infliximAb-antimetabolites Combination Therapy to Anti-metabolites monotheRapy and Infliximab monothErapy in Crohn's Disease Patients in Sustained Steroid-free Remission on Combination Therapy)., Design: In SPARE, patients with CD in sustained steroid-free clinical remission and on combination therapy were randomly allocated to three arms: continuing combination therapy, stopping infliximab or stopping immunosuppressant. In the baseline serum of the STORI and SPARE (arm stopping infliximab) cohorts, we studied 202 immune-related proteins. The proteins associated with time to relapse (univariable Cox model) were compared between STORI and SPARE. The discriminative ability of biomarkers (individually and combined in pairs) was evaluated by the c-statistic (concordance analysis) which was compared with C-reactive protein (CRP), faecal calprotectin and a previously validated model (CEASE)., Results: In STORI and SPARE, distinct blood protein profiles were associated with the risk of short-term (eg, high level: CRP, haptoglobin, interleukin-6, C-type lectin domain family 4 member C) and mid/long-term relapse (eg, low level: Fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligand, kallistatin, fibroblast growth factor 2). At external validation, the top 10 biomarker pairs showed a higher c-statistic than the CEASE model, CRP and faecal calprotectin in predicting short-term (0.76-0.80 vs 0.74 vs 0.71 vs 0.69, respectively) and mid/long-term relapse (0.66-0.68 vs 0.61 vs 0.52 vs 0.59, respectively)., Conclusion: In patients with CD stopping infliximab, we confirm that the risk of short-term and mid/long-term relapse is associated with distinct blood protein profiles showing the potential to guide infliximab withdrawal., Trial Registration Number: NCT00571337 and NCT02177071., Competing Interests: Competing interests: PB has received research grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Celltrion, Mylan, Pfizer and Takeda; lecture fees from AbbVie, Celltrion, Janssen, Lilly and Takeda; and consulting fees from AbbVie, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Dr Falk Pharma, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Pentax, PSI-CRO, Roche, Takeda and Tetrameros. LV has received fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Mylan, Takeda, MSD, Janssen, Pfizer, Ferring and Galapagos. SV has received speaker’s fees from AbbVie, Ferring, Janssen and Takeda. J-FC has received grants from AbbVie, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Prometheus, Takeda and Bristol Myers Squibb; receiving payment for lectures from AbbVie, and Takeda; receiving consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AnaptysBio, Allergan, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Galmed Research, Glaxo Smith Kline, Genentech (Roche), Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Kaleido Biosciences, Immunic, Invea, Iterative Scopes, Merck, Landos, Microba Life Science, Novartis, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Protagonist Therapeutics, Prometheus, Sanofi, Seres, Takeda, Teva, TiGenix, Vifor; and hold stock options in Intestinal Biotech Development. EL has received educational and research grants from Janssen, Pfizer, AbbVie and Takeda, Fresenius-Kabi; speaker fees from AbbVie, Dr Falk Pharma, Ferring, Janssen, Pfizer, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Galapagos and Takeda; advisory board fees for AbbVie, Celgene, Ferring, Janssen, BMS, Pfizer, Takeda, Gilead-Galapagos, Arena and Elli Lilly; and consultancy fees from AbbVie., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Limited approval of second-line treatments in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (pIBD) necessitates optimized use of infliximab (IFX) with proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). We investigated whether early combo-therapy with an immunomodulator (IMM) provides additional benefit., Methods: In the retrospectively reviewed medical records of all children treated with IFX and proactive TDM between 2013 and 2022, IMMearly (IMM ≤3 months since IFX start) was evaluated against IMMother/no (late/short or no IMM) over follow-up of 3 to 60 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to analyze time to loss of response (LOR) with IFX discontinuation or time to antibodies-to-IFX (ATI) development., Results: Three hundred fifteen patients with pIBD were reviewed; of those, 127 with 2855 visits were included (77 CD, 50 UC/IBD-unclassified). Sixty patients received IMMearly, 20 patients IMMother, and 47 had IFX monotherapy. Median follow-up time was 30 and 26 months for IMMearly and IMMother/no, respectively, with comparable proactive TDM. Infliximab treatment persistence was 68% after 60 months. Loss of response was observed in 7 IMMearly and 15 IMMother/no patients (P = .16). Early combo-therapy significantly delayed LOR with IFX discontinuation (median LOR free interval IMMearly 30 months vs IMMother/no 9 months, P = .01). Patients with IMMother/no were 10-, 3- and 2-times more likely to experience LOR with IFX discontinuation after 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. There were no significant group differences regarding the presence of any positive (>10 arbitrary units per milliliter [AU/mL]) or high (>100 AU/mL) ATI, median ATI concentrations, and ATI-free interval., Conclusions: Early IMM combo-therapy in proactively monitored patients with pIBD significantly prolonged the median LOR free interval compared with late/short or no IMM treatment., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Dose escalation of biologics may restore response in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) who experience inadequate response or loss of response, but the rates of dose escalation and subsequent adverse clinical outcomes have not been well characterized., Objective: To evaluate the rate of dose escalation of biologics and associated adverse clinical outcomes and economic outcomes in biologic-naive patients with CD., Methods: ODESSA-CD (real wOrld Dose EScalation and outcomeS with biologics in IBD pAtients with Crohn's Disease) was a retrospective cohort study conducted using claims data from IBM MarketScan databases. Adults with CD with at least 1 claim for an index drug (adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, or vedolizumab) between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2018, and no claims for biologics in the 6 months prior (ie, biologic naive) were included. Follow-up ended on June 30, 2020. Cox proportional hazards models and logistic regression models were used to compare the rate of dose escalation and the likelihood of adverse clinical outcomes and costs after dose escalation, respectively., Results: Of the 2,664 eligible patients, most (71.4%) were younger than 50 years and 50.5% were male. The rate of dose escalation was higher with the anti-tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) treatments adalimumab (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.703; P < 0.0001) and infliximab (HR = 1.690; P < 0.0001) compared with vedolizumab, but there was no significant difference between ustekinumab and vedolizumab (HR = 0.842; P = 0.730). After dose escalation, the likelihood of infection, sepsis, and inflammatory bowel disease-related hospitalization did not differ among biologics (anti-TNFα vs vedolizumab: odds ratio [OR] = 1.141, P = 0.599; ustekinumab vs vedolizumab: OR = 0.891; P = 0.836); however, corticosteroid use was more likely with anti-TNFα treatment than with vedolizumab (OR = 1.740, P = 0.002). Among patients whose dose was escalated, index drug costs were likely to be higher with anti-TNFα treatment and ustekinumab than with vedolizumab (anti-TNFα vs vedolizumab: ratio of expected cost = 1.429, P = 0.002; ustekinumab vs vedolizumab: ratio of expected cost = 3.115, P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Patients who were biologic naive and received ustekinumab or vedolizumab were less likely to undergo dose escalation than those who received anti-TNFα treatment. Adverse clinical outcomes after dose escalation were similar among these biologics but with different costs. These analyses may inform providers and payers of the clinical and economic implications of dose escalation.

Background and Objective: Rifaximin is used to treat diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D). However, determining the most effective regimen remains a challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a 10-day high-dose course of rifaximin (2200 mg/day) and its effects on both abdominal symptoms and quality of life (QOL) in patients with IBS-D., Method: Adult patients with moderate to severe IBS-D (Rome IV) and fecal urgency and bloating were prescribed rifaximin 1100 mg twice daily for 10 days. Demographic information, the IBS Symptom Severity Index (IBS-SSI) score (using a 7-point Likert scale), and Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) score were recorded at baseline, day 10, and 4 weeks after treatment cessation. IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) and IBS-QOL scores were recorded at baseline and day 10. Any drug adverse effects were recorded., Results: In total, 39 patients completed the study. Average scores for all abdominal symptoms and BSS showed significant improvement at day 10 and 4 weeks after treatment cessation (all p < 0.001). A significant improvement was seen in IBS-SSS and overall IBS-QOL score at day 10 (p < 0.001), with the highest improvement (31%) in interference with activity. Moreover, composite improvement rates were 38.64% for all abdominal symptoms, together with BSS < 5, bi-composite (66.67% for abdominal pain + bloating; 61.54% for abdominal pain + urgency), and 56.41% for tri-composite (abdominal pain + bloating + urgency) symptoms. Notably, no serious adverse effects were reported, and the adherence rate was 94.9%., Conclusions: Abdominal symptoms and overall QOL, especially in social and work dimensions, significantly improved in patients with moderate to severe IBS-D following a regimen of rifaximin 2200 mg/day, which was well tolerated., Competing Interests: Declarations Conflict of interest Marjan Mokhtare, Maryam Fathi, Amir M. Sadeghian, Mohammad-Javad Sotoudeheian, and Abolfazl Namazi have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article. Funding The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript. Ethics approval This study and all study-related procedures were approved by the medical ethics committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (approval date 2023-06-11; ethics committee reference number: IR.IUMS.FMD.REC.1402.135) and so registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20141201020178N12). Consent to participate Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent to publication Not applicable. Data availability statement The data used in this study are accessible upon a reasonable request to the corresponding author. Code availability Not applicable. Author contributions All authors contributed to the study's conception and design. Marjan Mokhtare, Maryam Fathi, Amir M. Sadeghian, and Mohammad-Javad Sotoudeheian prepared the material and collected and analyzed the data. Marjan Mokhtare and Abolfazl Namazi wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors commented on subsequent versions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: There are a plethora of therapeutic options for the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Despite this, clinical outcomes with standard dosing often fall short of established targets. While efforts centre on developing novel therapies, there is an ongoing need to optimise the use of existing agents., Aims: To focus on strategies to optimise response to biologic (monoclonal antibody) therapies in IBD, including use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)., Methods: An extensive review of the published literature., Results: TDM is a strategy aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of drugs with variable exposure-response relationships by measuring serum concentrations of biologic therapies and detecting neutralising antibodies. Reactive TDM is performed when therapeutic goals have not been achieved. Tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF) inhibitors are the treatment class most frequently associated with immunogenicity and loss of response. Immunogenicity can be reduced through avoidance of low serum drug concentrations by dose optimisation or use of concomitant immunomodulator therapy. Subtherapeutic dosing in the absence of antidrug antibodies is best managed by dose escalation or dose interval reduction. Persistent neutralising drug antibodies necessitate switching to an alternative therapy. Proactively ensuring adequate serum trough levels might help sustain treatment durability and prevent loss of response. Newer non-TNF inhibitors demonstrate less robust exposure-response relationships, and TDM may not prove as beneficial., Conclusions: In the treat-to-target paradigm of IBD treatment, optimising treatment effect with dose optimisation, which may involve strategies including TDM, increases the likelihood of achieving clinical remission and may accomplish deeper levels of remission beyond symptom control., (© 2024 The Author(s). Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The optimal dosing strategy for infliximab in steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is unknown. We compared intensified and standard dose infliximab rescue strategies and explored maintenance therapies following infliximab induction in ASUC., Methods: In this open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial, patients aged 18 years or older from 13 Australian tertiary hospitals with intravenous steroid-refractory ASUC were randomly assigned (1:2) to receive a first dose of 10 mg/kg infliximab or 5 mg/kg infliximab (randomisation 1). Block randomisation was used and stratified by history of thiopurine exposure and study site, with allocation concealment maintained via computer-generated randomisation. Patients in the 10 mg/kg group (intensified induction strategy [IIS]) received a second dose at day 7 or earlier at the time of non-response; all patients in the 5 mg/kg group were re-randomised between day 3 and day 7 (1:1; randomisation 2) to a standard induction strategy (SIS) or accelerated induction strategy (AIS), resulting in three induction groups. Patients in the SIS group received 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6, with an extra 5 mg/kg dose between day 3 and day 7 if no response. Patients in the AIS group received 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 1, and 3, with the week 1 dose increased to 10 mg/kg and given between day 3 and day 7 if no response. The primary outcome was clinical response by day 7 (reduction in Lichtiger score to <10 with a decrease of ≥3 points from baseline, improvement in rectal bleeding, and decreased stool frequency to ≤4 per day). Secondary endpoints assessed outcomes to day 7 and exploratory outcomes compared induction regimens until month 3. From month 3, maintenance therapy was selected based on treatment experience, with use of thiopurine monotherapy, combination infliximab and thiopurine, or infliximab monotherapy, with follow-up as a cohort study up to month 12. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02770040, and is completed., Findings: Between July 20, 2016, and Sept 24, 2021, 138 patients were randomly assigned (63 [46%] female and 75 [54%] male); 46 received a first dose of 10 mg/kg infliximab and 92 received 5 mg/kg infliximab. After randomisation 1, we observed no significant difference in the proportion of patients who had a clinical response by day 7 between the 10 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg groups (30 [65%] of 46 vs 56 [61%] of 92, p=0·62; risk ratio adjusted for thiopurine treatment history, 1·06 [95% CI 0·94-1·20], p=0·32). We found no significant differences in secondary endpoints including time to clinical response or change in Lichtiger score from baseline to day 7. Two patients who received 10 mg/kg infliximab underwent colectomy in the first 7 days compared with no patients in the 5 mg/kg group (p=0·21). Three serious adverse events occurred in three patients in both the 10 mg/kg group and 5 mg/kg group. After randomisation 2, the proportions of patients with clinical response at day 14 (34 [74%] of 46 in the IIS group, 35 [73%] of 48 in the AIS group, and 30 [68%] of 44 in the SIS group, p=0·81), clinical remission at month 3 (23 [50%], 25 [52%], 21 [48%], p=0·92), steroid-free remission at month 3 (19 [41%], 20 [42%], 18 [41%], p=1·0), endoscopic remission at month 3 (21 [46%], 22 [46%], 21 [48%], p=0·98), and colectomy at month 3 (three [7%] of 45, nine [19%] of 47, five [12%] of 43, p=0·20) were not significantly different between groups. Between day 8 and month 3, the proportion of patients with at least one infectious adverse event possibly related to infliximab was two (4%) of 46 in the IIS group, eight (17%) of 48 in the AIS group, and eight (18%) of 44 in the SIS group (p=0·082). No deaths occurred in the study., Interpretation: Infliximab is a safe and effective rescue therapy in ASUC. In steroid-refractory ASUC, a first dose of 10 mg/kg infliximab was not superior to 5 mg/kg infliximab in achieving clinical response by day 7. Intensified, accelerated, and standard induction regimens did not result in a significant difference in clinical response by day 14 or in remission or colectomy rates by month 3., Funding: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, Gastroenterology Society of Australia, Gandel Philanthropy, Australian Postgraduate Award, Janssen-Cilag., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MCC is supported by a Gandel Major Philanthropy Grant and an Australian Postgraduate Award, and has received research funding from Janssen-Cilag. CFDLWS has served as a speaker for DiaSorin, has received educational support from Pfizer, Shire, and Ferring, has received research funding from the Robert C Bulley Charitable Foundation and St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Research Endowment Fund, and is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Postgraduate Scholarship. DC has received educational support from Viatris and is supported by an NHMRC Postgraduate Scholarship. EKW has served as a consultant, advisory board member, or speaker for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ferring, Janssen, Celltrion, Falk, and Takeda, is supported by an NHMRC Emerging Leadership Level 1 Fellowship, and has received research support from Ferring and Janssen. AP has served as an advisory board member or received speaker fees from AbbVie, Ferring, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, and Dr Falk Pharma. BC has served as a consultant, advisory board member, or speaker for AbbVie, Celltrion, Chiesi, Ferring, Janssen, Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda, and Shire, and has received research support from AbbVie, Celltrion, The Gastroenterological Society of Australia, the Helmsley Charitable Trust, the NHMRC, and Takeda. WN has received educational and research support from Pfizer, AbbVie, Janssen, Shire and Ferring. JB has served as a consultant, advisory board member, or speaker for AbbVie, Ferring, Janssen, Celltrion, Chiesi, Janssen, Pfizer, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol Myers Squibb, Microba, Anatara, and Takeda, and has received research support from the NHMRC, United States Department of Defense, AbbVie, Janssen, Ferring, Pfizer, and Takeda. MG has served on the advisory board of Pfizer and AbbVie and has received speaker fees and research grants from Abbvie, Celltrion, Janssen, Pfizer and travel grants from Pfizer. NM has received speaker fees from Takeda and Baxter, and educational support from Baxter. DRVL has received consulting fees from AbbVie and speaker fees for Takeda. NSD reports serving as an advisory board member or speaker for AbbVie, Celltrion, Chiesi, Ferring, Janssen, Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda, and Shire, and has received research support from AbbVie, Celltrion, The Gastroenterological Society of Australia, and the NHMRC. RWL reports advisory board membership for AbbVie, Aspen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Chiesi, Ferring, Glutagen, Hospira, Janssen, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, and Takeda, and research grants from the University of Sydney, the McCusker Charitable Foundation, Celltrion, Shire, Janssen, Takeda, Joanna Tiddy grant, the Gastroenterological Society of Australia, the NHMRC, The Gutsy Group, and Pfizer. MPS has received educational grants or research support from Gilead and Celltrion, speaker fees from Janssen, AbbVie, Ferring, Takeda, Pfizer, Shire, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, and Dr Falk Pharma, and has served on advisory boards or received consultancy fees for Janssen, Takeda, Pfizer, Celgene, AbbVie, MSD, Emerge Health, Gilead, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, and Eli Lilly, and has received travel grants from Pfizer and Dr Falk Pharma. PDC has served as a consultant, advisory board member, or speaker for AbbVie, Baxter, Ferring, Janssen, Celltrion and Emerge Health, and is supported by a NHMRC Emerging Leadership Level 2 Fellowship, and has received research support from AbbVie, Ferring, Janssen and Pfizer. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: Thiopurine co-therapy with anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNFα) agents is associated with higher anti-TNFα drug levels and reduced immunogenicity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)., Aims: We aimed to evaluate the association between 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) and anti-TNFα levels and the optimal 6-TGN threshold level associated with higher anti-TNFα levels in combination therapy., Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional multicentre study of patients with IBD on combination anti-TNFα and thiopurine maintenance therapy between January 2015 and August 2021. Primary outcomes were infliximab and adalimumab levels. Secondary outcomes were antibodies to infliximab (ATI) or adalimumab (ATA). Univariable and multivariable linear regression were performed to identify variables associated with anti-TNFα levels. Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to define the optimal 6-TGN cut-off levels associated with therapeutic anti-TNFα levels., Results: The study included 743 paired 6-TGN and anti-TNFα levels (640 infliximab and 103 adalimumab). 6-TGN levels were associated with infliximab levels, but not adalimumab levels, on univariable and multivariable regression. The optimal 6-TGN cut-off associated with therapeutic infliximab levels (≥5 mcg/mL) was 261 pmol/8 × 10 8 red blood cell (RBC) (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.57) for standard infliximab dosing and 227.5 pmol/8 × 10 8 RBC (AUC = 0.58) for escalated dosing. For therapeutic adalimumab levels (≥7.5 mcg/mL), the 6-TGN cut-off was 218.5 pmol/8 × 10 8 RBC (AUC = 0.59) for standard adalimumab dosing and 237.5 pmol/8 × 10 8 RBC (AUC = 0.63) for escalated dosing., Conclusion: 6-TGN levels were weakly associated with infliximab but not adalimumab levels in combination therapy. 6-TGN levels in the lower end of the therapeutic range (230-260 pmol/8 × 10 8 RBC) may be adequate to maintain higher infliximab levels, particularly with escalated infliximab dosing., (© 2024 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

Background and Aims: Subcutaneous (SC) formulations of infliximab (IFX) and vedolizumab (VDZ) are approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of switching from intravenous (IV) to SC formulations of IFX and VDZ in IBDs., Methods: This multicentre, retrospective study collected data of adult patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) switched to SC IFX or VDZ. The primary endpoint was clinical remission at 12 months stratified based on timing of switch. A composite endpoint consisting of therapy discontinuation, reverse-switch, need for steroids, and drug optimization was evaluated. A multivariate analysis investigated the association between patients' characteristics and outcomes., Results: Two hundred and thirty-one patients (59% UC, 53% male, mean age 44 ± 15 years, 68% IFX) from 13 centres were included. The switch occurred at Week 6 in a third of cases (36%). Median time to switch was 13 months. Most patients switched to SC IFX and VDZ were in clinical remission at 3 (87% and 77%), 6 (86% and 83%) and 12 (63% and 60%) months. In the multivariate analysis, there was no difference in clinical remission rate at 12 months; however, patients switched at Week 6 had a higher rate of experiencing any therapeutic changes at 3 (false discovery rate (FDR) = .002), 6 (FDR <1 × 10 -10 ) or 12 months (FDR = .08). Clinical disease activity at baseline (only in UC) (FDR = .07) and previous exposure to biologics (FDR = .001) were risk factors for composite endpoint at 6 and 12 months., Conclusion: SC IFX and VDZ are effective in daily clinical practice in IBD patients. Switching patients in remission reduces the risk of negative outcomes., (© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Clinical Investigation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation.)

Background & Aims: The impact of thiopurine de-escalation while on vedolizumab versus continuing thiopurine therapy in ulcerative colitis (UC) is unclear. We aimed to determine the effect of thiopurine withdrawal for patients with UC in remission on vedolizumab., Methods: This multicenter randomized controlled trial recruited UC patients on vedolizumab 300 mg intravenously every 8 weeks and a thiopurine. Patients in steroid-free clinical remission for ≥6 months and endoscopic remission/improvement (Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1) were randomized 2:1 to withdraw or continue thiopurine. Primary outcome was comparing week 48 vedolizumab trough concentrations. Secondary outcomes were clinical relapse (partial Mayo score ≥3 and fecal calprotectin >150 μg/g or increase in Mayo endoscopic subscore ≥1 from baseline), fecal calprotectin remission (<150 μg/g), C-reactive protein remission (<5 mg/L), centrally read endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0), histologic remission (Nancy index = 0), histo-endoscopic remission, and adverse events., Results: In total, 62 patients were randomized to continue (n = 20) or withdraw (n = 42) thiopurine. At week 48, vedolizumab trough concentrations were not significantly different between continue and withdrawal groups (14.7 μg/mL, interquartile rate [IQR], 12.3-18.5 μg/mL versus 15.9 μg/mL, IQR, 10.1-22.7 μg/mL, respectively, P = 0.36). The continue group had significantly higher fecal calprotectin remission (95.0%, 19/20 versus 71.4%, 30/42; P = .03), histologic remission (80.0%, 16/20 versus 48.6%, 18/37; P = .02), and histo-endoscopic remission (75.0%, 15/20 versus 32.4%, 12/37; P = .002) than the withdrawal group. Histologic activity (hazard ratio [HR], 15.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-146.5; P = .02) and prior anti-tumor necrosis factor exposure (HR, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.3-33.8; P = .03) predicted clinical relapse after thiopurine withdrawal., Conclusions: Thiopurine withdrawal did not affect vedolizumab trough concentrations. However, it may increase fecal calprotectin, histologic, and histo-endoscopic activity. Histologic activity and prior anti-tumor necrosis factor exposure may predict disease relapse on thiopurine withdrawal for patients using vedolizumab for UC. Australian and New Zealand Trial Registry, number ACTRN12618000812291., (Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recently, a formula of subcutaneous infliximab (SC-IFX) has been approved for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), demonstrating a better pharmacokinetic and immunogenic profiles, compared to intravenous infliximab (IV-IFX), with similar efficacy and safety., Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical, biochemical, and pharmacological outcomes of IBD patients in clinical remission, who switched from IV-IFX to SC-IFX, with a follow-up period of 6 months., Methods: Retrospective cohort study, including IBD patients in clinical remission, previously medicated with IV-IFX, who switched to SC-IFX 120 mg every other week. Biochemical parameters were evaluated before the switch and 6 months after, namely infliximab serum concentrations, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and fecal calprotectin., Results: Included 41 patients in clinical remission, 32 with Crohn's disease (78.0%) and 9 with ulcerative colitis (22.0%). All patients maintained clinical remission during the 6 months after the switch, with a treatment persistence rate of 100%, and no patients requiring corticosteroid therapy, switching back to IV-IFX, or IBD-related hospitalization. The mean infliximab serum concentrations were significantly higher after 6 months of SC-IFX (17.3 ± 6.6 vs. 9.1 ± 5.5 µg/ml, P  < 0.001). However, there were no differences between values of ESR, CRP, and fecal calprotectin, before and after the switch ( P  = 0.791, P  = 0.246, and P  = 0.639). Additionally, none of the patients developed antibodies to infliximab., Conclusion: Switching from IV-IFX to SC-IFX in IBD patients in clinical remission is effective and leads to higher infliximab serum concentrations, regardless of the combination with immunomodulatory therapy., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To review the pharmacologic and clinical profile of mirikizumab in the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC)., Data Sources: A PubMed search was performed from inception to December 2023 using keywords mirikizumab, interleukin-23 inhibitor , and UC . Information was also obtained from package inserts as well as published abstracts., Study Selection and Data Extraction: Phase 3 studies plus relevant literature on mirikizumab pharmacologic and clinical profile were reviewed., Data Synthesis: Mirikizumab approval was based on LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2. In the phase 3 studies involving patients with moderate to severe UC, mirikizumab, when compared to placebo, resulted in clinical remission in a significantly higher proportion of patients in both the induction and maintenance phase. In addition, mirikizumab met the secondary endpoints of alternate definition of clinical remission, endoscopic remission, glucocorticoid-free clinical remission, histologic-endoscopic mucosal remission, and improvement in bowel urgency status, bowel-urgency remission, and maintenance of clinical remission. Common adverse events noted include infection (15.1%), injection-site reaction (8.7%), nasopharyngitis (7.2%), and headache (3.3%)., Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice in Comparison to Existing Agents: Mirikizumab is the first selective interleukin 23 (IL-23) inhibitor approved for UC. Additional studies are required to determine how to position mirikizumab in both biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients with moderate to severe UC., Conclusion: Mirikizumab provides a novel mechanism of action for the treatment of moderate to severe UC and is another welcomed treatment advance in the treatment arsenal, providing a more selective mechanism of action while maintaining a comparable safety profile., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: DC has served on the speaker bureau for Janssen Pharmaceuticals and has served as a consultant to Bristol Myers Squibb, and Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbvie, Janssen Pharmaceuticals. SB has served as a consultant to Bristol Myers Squibb, Prometheus Laboratories, Pfizer, AbbVie, and Boehringer Ingelheim. HS has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Infliximab (IFX) has transformed the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). While intravenous (IV) IFX has been effective, a subcutaneous (SC) formulation offers advantages in convenience and cost. However, there is lack of evidence regarding the transition from IV to SC-IFX, especially for patients with inadequate responses. This study investigates the effectiveness of switching from IV to SC-IFX in patients with inadequate responses during IV maintenance therapy. A retrospective study enrolled IBD patients who transitioned to SC-IFX after demonstrating inadequate responses during IV maintenance therapy. The study collected data of demographics of patients and dose and therapies administered prior to the IV-IFX. Primary outcomes included improvements in C-reactive protein (CRP) or fecal calprotectin (FC) levels. This study evaluated the trough levels and its differences between pre- and post-switching. Among 44 patients included, 10 exhibited CRP elevation before the switch, with 6 showing normalization post-switch. Similarly, 42 patients had elevated FC levels pre-switch, with 26 experiencing reductions post-switch. Trough levels increased after the switch. However, there were no significant differences between responders and non-responders. This study is the first study to investigate the transition therapy of IV to SC-IFX in patients with inadequate response. This suggests that SC-IFX could be a viable alternative in the management of IBD. However, further research is necessary to evaluate its efficacy in a larger population of patients who exhibit inadequate responses during IV-IFX maintenance therapy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The use of concomitant azathioprine may improve efficacy and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of infliximab (IFX) but is also associated with an increased risk of adverse events. Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (pTDM) of IFX monotherapy is an alternative strategy to improve PK. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether IFX with an immunomodulator (combo) has PK benefits over IFX-pTDM (mono) in pediatric Crohn's disease (CD)., Methods: This PK analysis included pediatric CD patients who started either IFX combo (TISKids study) or IFX mono with pTDM (REFINE cohort). Combo and mono IFX trough levels (TLs) and antibodies-to-infliximab were assessed at infusion 3, 4, and 5. A population PK model was built to compare IFX PK outcomes (clearance [CL], TLs and cumulative exposure) between combo and mono groups at infusion 4 and 5. Clinical response and steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR) was assessed at infusion 4 and 5., Results: This study included 128 pediatric CD patients (66 mono and 62 combo). At infusion 5, there was no significant difference between mono and combo median TLs 4.1 µg/mL (2.1, 7.8) vs 5.9 µg/mL (3.2, 9.4; P = .14) or median CL 0.26 L/d (0.21, 0.32) vs 0.26 L/d (0.21, 0.33; P = .81). Mono patients had a lower SFCR rate at infusion 5 (53% [31 of 59] vs 80% [32 of 40]; P = .01). Clinical response rates were significantly higher among combo than mono patients at both infusion 4 and 5., Conclusions: This study suggests that there are no PK differences (TLs and CL) between combo and mono therapy in pediatric CD patients who started IFX., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a serious health problem that requires a constant need to identify new effective drugs. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of mirikizumab compared with other biologic drugs approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active UC. This systematic review with frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the use of adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab, mirikizumab, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab compared with placebo or with another approved biologic drug. The NMA was conducted using the netmeta R software package. The P score was used to determine the treatment ranking. A total of 14 RCTs were included in the analysis. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of clinical response and remission between mirikizumab and other drugs. Mirikizumab was superior to placebo for clinical response (induction: odds ratio [OR] = 2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.63-3.48; maintenance: OR = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.59-6.89) and remission (induction: OR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.20-3.63; maintenance: OR = 2.96; 95% CI: 1.62-5.40). The probability plot indicated that infliximab might be the most effective option in terms of both clinical response and remission (P score, 0.8971 and 0.8814, respectively) in induction phase. No significant differences were noted between the studied drugs in any adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs) and infections for the induction phase, and in any AEs, infections and serious infections for the maintenance phase. The drugs differed in terms of discontinuation due to AEs (induction and maintenance phases) as well as SAEs and serious infections (maintenance phase). Mirikizumab did not differ from other biologics in terms of clinical response and remission for both induction and maintenance phases in patients with UC. Mirikizumab during the induction phases achieved rank 3 for clinical response and rank 5 for clinical remission. Therefore, it represents a valuable treatment option. The lack of significant differences in the risk of AEs and SAEs suggests that mirikizumab has a similar safety profile to the other drugs., (© 2024 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.)

We aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of vedolizumab for acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in adults undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and assess potential clinically relevant covariates. Dosing, patient characteristics, and PK from a phase 1b, open-label, dose-finding study of vedolizumab 75 mg initial dose escalated to 300 mg and a phase 3 study of vedolizumab 300 mg in patients receiving allo-HSCT were analyzed using a two-compartment population PK model with linear elimination. Covariates included age, race, weight, sex, albumin, lymphocyte count, GvHD type, and concomitant medications. Weight, albumin, and lymphocyte count were time-varying covariates. Model selection was driven by goodness-of-fit criteria, precision of parameter estimates, and visual predictive checks. In 193 patients undergoing allo-HSCT, vedolizumab PK were well described by a two-compartment, linear PK model. Using reference covariate values, final parameter estimates (95% confidence intervals [CI]) were: clearance, 0.148 (0.136, 0.162) L/day; central volume of distribution, 3.12 (3.03, 3.21) L; intercompartmental clearance, 0.500 (0.408, 0.612) L/day; and peripheral volume of distribution, 3.95 (3.52, 4.44) L. Weight and albumin were the most important predictors of vedolizumab PK, with clearance decreasing by ≈20% for low body weight/high albumin and increasing by ≈30% for high body weight/low albumin. There was an inverse relationship between vedolizumab clearance and age, but no detectable effect for lymphocyte count or GvHD type. Post hoc analyses did not detect any relationship between vedolizumab PK and concomitant medications. In summary, the covariates studied did not have a clinically meaningful effect on the PK of vedolizumab., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

Background: Variceal hemorrhage treatment includes endoscopy within 12 hours of admission and octreotide therapy for 2-5 days post-endoscopy. Duration of pre-endoscopy octreotide can be prolonged when intervention is delayed. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of extended pre-endoscopy octreotide on rebleeding after endoscopy when comparing short vs long durations of post-endoscopy octreotide. Methods: This was a single center, retrospective cohort evaluating adult cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal hemorrhage admitted between July 1, 2017 and June 30, 2020. Study groups included patients receiving octreotide ≥12 hours prior to endoscopy followed by ≤ 48 (short course) or >48 hours (standard course) after endoscopy. The primary outcome was post-endoscopy rebleeding, defined as hemoglobin decrease of ≥2 g/dL from baseline or the requirement of ≥1 unit of packed red blood cells. Results: Of the 169 patients included, 88 patients received short course octreotide after endoscopy, and 81 patients received standard course octreotide after endoscopy. Twenty-nine (33%) patients in the short course group and 43 (53.1%) in the standard course group experienced the primary endpoint (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.24 - 4.29; P = .008). Conclusion: Extended pre-endoscopy octreotide may be beneficial in preventing rebleeding when intervention is delayed. Further studies are needed to determine the necessary octreotide duration in delayed endoscopy and varying bleeding risk., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), consists of two primary types: Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD). Infliximab (IFX) and Adalimumab (ADA) are frequently utilized in the management of moderate to severe cases of IBD., Aim: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of IFX and ADA in individuals diagnosed with moderate to severe IBD., Method: This study is a prospective open-labeled randomized parallel study that included moderate to severe IBD patients treated with either IFX or ADA. A total of 56 patients participated, with 34 patients received IFX and 22 patients received ADA. Various measures, including Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Mayo Score/ Disease Activity Index (DAI), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, were taken at baseline and week 14 to assess the efficacy of the treatments. In addition, the levels of drugs and sTREM-1 were measured at 14 weeks. Patient safety was monitored throughout the study period., Results: In the group received IFX, there was a notable decrease in CDAI (P = 0.045), DAI (P = 0.026), and CRP (P = 0.023 for CD, and P = 0.021 for UC) levels. In addition, the group received ADA experienced a significant reduction in CDAI (P = 0.001), DAI (P = 0.032), and CRP (P < 0.018 for CD and P = 0.003 for UC) levels. Responders had higher drug concentrations than non-responders, notably IFX concentration was higher in responders with CD (P = 0.001) and UC (P < 0.001). ADA concentration was higher in UC (P <= 0.001) and all CD patients responded to the treatment. The same trend was observed for sTREM-1 levels in CD and UC patients (P = 0.042, and P = 0.015, respectively) in the IFX group. In UC patients treated with ADA, the level of sTREM-1 was significantly low (P = 0.002)., Conclusion: Both IFX and ADA have a good safety profile and deliver a beneficial clinical and laboratory response in moderate-severe IBD patients., Clinical Trial Registration: This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT05291039. (You can access the study at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05291039 (First Posted: March 22, 2022)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background & Aims: CT-P13 subcutaneous (SC), an SC formulation of the intravenous (IV) infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 IV, creates a unique exposure profile. The LIBERTY studies aimed to demonstrate superiority of CT-P13 SC vs placebo as maintenance therapy in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC)., Methods: Two randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies were conducted in patients with moderately to severely active CD or UC and inadequate response or intolerance to corticosteroids and immunomodulators. All patients received open-label CT-P13 IV 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, and 6. At week 10, clinical responders were randomized (2:1) to CT-P13 SC 120 mg or placebo every 2 weeks until week 54 (maintenance phase) using prefilled syringes. (Co-) primary end points were clinical remission and endoscopic response (CD) and clinical remission (UC) at week 54 (all-randomized population)., Results: Overall, 396 patients with CD and 548 patients with UC received induction treatment. At week 54 in the CD study, statistically significant higher proportions of CT-P13 SC-treated patients vs placebo-treated patients achieved clinical remission (62.3% vs 32.1%; P < .0001) and endoscopic response (51.1% vs 17.9%; P < .0001). In the UC study, clinical remission rates at week 54 were statistically significantly higher with CT-P13 SC vs placebo (43.2% vs 20.8%; P < .0001). Achievement of key secondary end points was significantly higher with CT-P13 SC vs placebo across both studies. CT-P13 SC was well tolerated, with no new safety signals identified., Conclusions: CT-P13 SC was more effective than placebo as maintenance therapy and was well tolerated in patients with moderately to severely active CD or UC who responded to CT-P13 IV induction., Clinicaltrials: gov, Numbers: NCT03945019 (CD) and NCT04205643 (UC)., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A few prospective cohort studies support the safety of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous administration of vedolizumab during maintenance therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Real-life data on switching after intravenous induction therapy are lacking., Objective: The aim was to obtain real-world data on subcutaneous vedolizumab treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease after switching from intravenous vedolizumab induction or maintenance therapy, and to evaluate treatment persistence, safety, and changes in disease activity and serum vedolizumab concentrations., Methods: We performed a retrospective registry-based study of inflammatory bowel disease patients who received subcutaneous vedolizumab therapy in two tertiary centres., Results: Altogether, 103 patients (26 Crohn's disease and 77 ulcerative colitis) switching from intravenous maintenance therapy (group 1) and 44 patients (14 and 30, respectively) switching from intravenous induction therapy (group 2) were included. At 6 months from baseline, 90.3% of the patients in group 1 and 90.9% of the patients in group 2 continued on subcutaneous vedolizumab. After the switch in group 1, disease activity remained stable. In group 2, clinical disease activity decreased significantly in ulcerative colitis patients ( P  = 0.002). The median serum vedolizumab concentration was 34.00 µg/ml during subcutaneous maintenance therapy in group 1, which was significantly higher than the median concentration during intravenous therapy (17.00 µg/ml, P  < 0.001), but remained unchanged in group 2 after the switch (31.50 µg/ml)., Conclusion: Based on these data, subcutaneous vedolizumab treatment is well-tolerated and the treatment persistence remains high after switching from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab therapy., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Subcutaneous [SC] infliximab may provide multiple benefits over intravenous [IV] formulations. However, studies for efficacy and safety in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] have been constrained by small sizes that limit the interpretation of outcomes, particularly for subgroups potentially at high risk of disease relapse., Methods: We conducted a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis up to January 2023, to evaluate the change in clinical remission after transitioning from IV to SC infliximab in patients with IBD in clinical remission. The primary outcome was measured using the relative risk for meta-analysis., Results: We identified 15 studies of patients established ≥ 3 months on IV infliximab, consisting of 1371 patients and 840 patient-years of follow-up. There was no loss of clinical remission in the IBD cohort overall, Crohn's disease [CD], or perianal CD [p = 0.55 and p = 0.11 at 9-12 months, and p = 0.50 at 6 months, respectively]. Neither prior IV dose [≤ 10 mg/kg 6-weekly] [p = 0.48] nor IBD disease subtype was associated with an increased clinical relapse rate at 6 months (p = 0.48 and p = 0.45 [UC vs CD], respectively)., Conclusion: Changing patients established on IV infliximab to an SC formulation is associated with a high ongoing clinical remission and a low adverse event rate. Furthermore, there are no signals for adverse outcomes among different IBD disease subtypes, nor in those on escalated IV infliximab dosing schedules up to 10 mg/kg 6-weekly. These data should provide patients and clinicians alike with confidence in SC infliximab use in IBD., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Biologic medications are a common therapy for those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). There are limited data on the outcomes of home-based biologic infusions for patients with IBD. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of biologic infusions for IBD patients who receive either home- or office-based administration., Methods: Patients receiving infliximab or vedolizumab were analyzed retrospectively over a period of 152 weeks. Survival free of major adverse events including delayed infusion reaction, steroid initiation, drug discontinuation, or IBD-related emergency department visits, admission, and surgery were compared using a Kaplan-Meier curve. Individual adverse events, infusion-.related quality measures, and markers of patient adherence were analyzed., Results: Adverse event-free survival was greater among those receiving home-based infusion (n = 154) compared with office-based infusion (n = 133). The office infusion cohort had higher rates of delayed infusion reactions (4 vs 0), IBD-related surgery (6 vs 0), and drug discontinuation (44 vs 35); this was a sicker cohort of patients compared with those in the home infusion group. Home infusion patients were less likely to receive correct weight-based dosing for infliximab (71.7% vs 89.3%), obtain labs for drug monitoring (53.2% vs 71.4%), and adhere to routine clinic visits (37.9% vs 58.1%)., Conclusions: The home-based infusion of biologics for IBD appears safe with lower rates of major adverse events compared with office-based infusions. However, those receiving home infusion were less likely to receive correct weight-based dosing for infliximab and were poorly adherent to routine follow-up., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: SBS is a rare and disabling condition. The standard management is based on diet optimization with parenteral supplementation. In addition, glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2)analogs, have shown promising results as disease-modifying therapies for SBS., Areas Covered: Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is defined as a reduction in functional intestinal length to less than 200 cm, leading to intestinal failure (IF) leading to malnutrition and parenteral support dependency. This review discusses the current management of SBS-CIFpatients, the place of GLP-2 analog treatment in terms of efficacy, safety and availability, and the new perspectives opened by the use of enterohormones., Expert Opinion: Clinical trials and real-world experience demonstrated that Teduglutide   reduces dependence on parenteral support and has a place in the management of patients with SBS-CIF.  The use of Teduglutide should be discussed in patients stabilized after resection and its introduction requires the advice of an expert center capable of assessing the benefit-risk ratio. The complex, individualized management of SBS-C IF requires theexpertise of a specialized IF center which a multidisciplinary approach. The arrival of new treatments will call for new therapeutic strategies, and the question of how to introduce and monitor them will represent a new therapeutic challenge.

Background: The optimal infliximab dose intensification strategy to address loss of response associated with subtherapeutic infliximab trough levels remains uncertain, as does whether post-intensification trough and treatment targets should influence this decision., Objectives: This pharmacokinetic simulation study aimed to identify infliximab dose intensification strategies capable of achieving post-intensification infliximab trough thresholds associated with clinical and objective treatment targets in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis., Methods: A validated pharmacokinetic infliximab model, applied to 200 simulated patients, identified those with subtherapeutic (< 3.00 mg/L) trough levels after 30 weeks of standard (5 mg/kg 8-weekly) dosing, and subsequently applied 10 dose intensification strategies over a further 32 weeks. The proportion of simulations achieving 32-week post-intensification infliximab trough levels associated with endoscopic remission (ulcerative colitis > 7.50 mg/L, Crohn's disease > 9.70 mg/L) was the primary outcome, with perianal fistula healing (Crohn's disease > 10.10 mg/L) and clinical improvement (ulcerative colitis > 3.70 mg/L, Crohn's disease > 7.00mg/L) evaluated as secondary outcomes. All outcomes were stratified by intensity of dose intensification, with standard (≤ 10 mg/kg 8-weekly or 5 mg/kg 4-weekly; n = 5) and intensive (> 10 mg/kg 8-weekly or 5 mg/kg 4-weekly; n = 5) dosing strategies defined, respectively., Results: The median pre-intensification infliximab trough level was 0.91 mg/L (interquartile range 1.37). Intensive dosing strategies were more likely to achieve infliximab trough concentrations associated with endoscopic remission (ulcerative colitis 36.48% vs. 10.80%, Crohn's disease 25.98 vs. 4.68%), perianal fistula healing (24.52% vs. 4.36%) and clinical improvement (ulcerative colitis 61.90% vs. 34.86%, Crohn's disease 40.32 vs. 12.08%) than standard intensification strategies (all p < 0.01). When controlling for cumulative (mg/kg) infliximab dose over 32 weeks, strategies that concurrently dose increased and interval shortened achieved the highest infliximab trough levels (all p < 0.01)., Conclusion: This simulation-based analysis highlights the potential of using post-intensification infliximab trough thresholds associated with aspirational treatment targets in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis to guide choice of infliximab dose intensification strategy. Intensive dose intensification strategies, particularly those that concurrently dose increase and interval shorten, appear to achieve higher infliximab levels than standard dose intensification strategies. This may be particularly important in the pursuit of stringent endpoints, such as endoscopic remission and fistula healing, which have been consistently associated with higher infliximab trough levels. These findings require validation across real-world cohorts., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Multiple studies in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents have shown that proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) during the maintenance phase leads to improved outcomes. We aimed to assess whether accelerated (IFX) administration during induction resulted in improved outcomes., Methods: This retrospective study included CD patients aged 5-17.9 years that were treated with IFX. We compared outcomes of patients treated during induction with 5-8 mg/kg dosing at Weeks 0, 2, 6, and 14 (Group 1), versus accelerated dosing (≥8 mg/kg and/or >4 infusions until Week 14, Group 2) of IFX. Primary outcome was steroid-free clinical remission by Week 52., Results: Sixty-eight patients were included, of whom seven discontinued IFX before Week 14, due to infusion reactions, immunogenic failure, or primary nonresponse. Comparison of Group 1 (n = 25) and Group 2 (n = 36) showed similar clinical characteristics, as well as inflammatory markers, at IFX initiation. Despite receiving significantly more IFX, and reaching a higher trough level by Week 14 (10.3 ± 1.2 vs. 3.3 ± 0.7, p < 0.001), the median Pediatric Crohn's disease Activity Index (PCDAI) was slightly higher in Group 2 versus Group 1 (14 [5-20] vs. 5 [0-15], p = 0.02). However, at Weeks 26 and 52 the PCDAI and inflammatory markers were comparable between the groups. Moreover, about 70% in both groups achieved the desirable trough IFX levels by Week 52., Conclusion: Accelerated IFX dosing during induction did not result in improved outcomes up to 12 months follow-up. Prospective studies are required to determine the exact timing in which proactive TDM should be applied., (© 2024 European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)

Data from phase IIb/III and phase III studies were used to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of risankizumab and its exposure-response relationships for efficacy and safety in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination accurately described risankizumab pharmacokinetics. Although certain covariates, namely, body weight, serum albumin, fecal calprotectin, sex, corticosteroid use, advanced therapy inadequate response, and pancolitis, were statistically correlated with risankizumab clearance, their impact on exposure was not clinically meaningful for efficacy or safety. Phase II exposure-response analyses demonstrated that the 1,200 mg intravenous (IV) induction dose at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 achieved near maximal response for all efficacy end points, with suboptimal efficacy from the 600 mg and little added benefit from the 1,800 mg regimens, justifying 1,200 mg IV as the induction dose in the phase III study. Phase III exposure-response analyses for efficacy during induction showed statistically significant exposure-response relationships at Week 12 following 1,200 mg IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, in line with phase IIb results. Exposure-response analyses for maintenance demonstrated modest improvement in Week 52 efficacy when increasing the subcutaneous dose from 180 mg to 360 mg with largely overlapping confidence intervals. Exposure-response analyses for safety indicated no apparent exposure-dependent safety events over the induction or maintenance treatment. Based on these results, the recommended dosing regimen for risankizumab in UC patients is 1,200 mg IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, followed by 180 mg or 360 mg subcutaneously at Week 12 and every 8 weeks thereafter., (© 2024 AbbVie Inc. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Background & Aims: Histologic evaluation of mucosal healing in Crohn's disease is an evolving treatment target. We evaluated histologic outcomes for mirikizumab efficacy and associations with endoscopic and 1-year outcomes., Methods: Biopsy specimens from 1 ileal and 4 colonic segments were evaluated at weeks 0, 12, and 52 from each of the 170 SERENITY participants. Criteria for the weeks 12 and 52 histologic response were no epithelial neutrophils or epithelial damage, or >50% decrease in either the Robarts Histopathology Index or the active Global Histologic Disease Activity Score, and remission (no mucosal neutrophils and no epithelial damage) had to be met in all biopsy specimens. Agreement was evaluated between histologic and endoscopic end points. Associations between 1-year outcomes and week 12 histologic and endoscopic response were evaluated., Results: At week 12, 1000 mg mirikizumab resulted in greater rates of histologic response (66% vs 27%; P < .001) and remission (26% vs 6%; P < .01) than placebo. Rates were numerically similar at 1 year (mirikizumab pooled response, 46%-69%; remission, 13%-31%). Agreement between week 12 histologic and endoscopic response was 69% (Cohen's kappa coefficient [κ] = 0.40) and remission was 83% (κ = 0.38) in all pooled arms, including placebo. At 1 year, the percentage of participants who received any dose of mirikizumab and achieved endoscopic remission differed by their week 12 response: histologic (20%), endoscopic (25%), combined histology-endoscopy (45%), or neither (4%) (P = .003)., Conclusions: In a post hoc analysis of phase 2 data, mirikizumab induced and sustained histologic response and remission in Crohn's disease over 52 weeks. Early combined histologic-endoscopic response was associated with endoscopic remission after 1 year of treatment with mirikizumab (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02891226)., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Use of infliximab (IFX) has improved outcomes in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, a proportion of patients does not respond to IFX or loses response over time. Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modelling is a promising approach for IFX dose optimization, but with the increasing number of PopPK models in literature, model evaluation is essential. The aims of this study are: (i) to validate the predictive performance of existing IFX PopPK models using a cohort of children with IBD; and (ii) to perform a Bayesian estimation of the most suitable model to predict the next IFX concentrations., Methods: PubMed was searched for IFX PopPK models in children. Selected models were rebuilt and analysed using R. Model performance was assessed through goodness-of-fit-plots, residuals against time, prediction error and prediction-corrected visual predictive checks. The validation cohort consisted of 73 children with IBD who were treated with IFX in our centre between 2017 and 2023 (340 IFX measurements)., Results: We identified 9 PopPK models. Model bias for individual predicted values ranged from -9.29% to 8.01% compared to bias for population predicted values. The model by Vande Casteele et al. demonstrated superior performance (individual predicted bias 2.13, population predicted bias -6.11); upon Bayesian estimation, it predicted induction trough levels with median error of 12.95% but had a median error of -69% predicting maintenance concentrations., Conclusion: The model by Vande Casteele et al. displayed superior performance in initial evaluations but had a high error in estimating next IFX levels and can only be used in practice to predict induction levels., (© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Aims: The aim is to investigate the effect of alvimopan on postoperative ileus and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing bowel resection., Methods: The PRISMA statement standards were followed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis. The available literature was searched to identify all studies comparing alvimopan with no alvimopan in patients undergoing bowel resection. Postoperative ileus and length of hospital stay were the primary outcomes, and time to first bowel motion was the secondary outcome. Random-effects modeling was applied for analyses., Results: Analysis of 94 833 patients from 26 studies showed that alvimopan was associated with lower risk of postoperative ileus (OR: .57, 95% CI .48 to .67, P <.00001; high GRADE certainty), shorter length of hospital stay (MD: -1.08 day, 95% CI -1.36 to -.81, P < .00001; moderate GRADE certainty), and shorter time to first bowel motion (MD: -.43 day, 95% CI -.58 to -.28, P < .00001; moderate GRADE certainty). Separate analyses of randomized controlled trials and observational studies showed similar findings. Subgroup analyses suggested consistent findings in patients undergoing elective bowel resection, emergency bowel resection, and open surgery; however, alvimopan did not improve the outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery., Conclusion: Robust evidence supports the routine use of alvimopan in patients undergoing open bowel resection as indicated by lower risk of postoperative ileus and shorter length of hospital stay. We support incorporation of alvimopan into enhanced recovery after surgery programs for the procedures involving open bowel resection. The role of alvimopan in minimally invasive bowel resection needs more research., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: Improving patient selection and development of biological therapies such as vedolizumab in IBD requires a thorough understanding of the mechanism of action and target binding, thereby providing individualised treatment strategies. We aimed to visualise the macroscopic and microscopic distribution of intravenous injected fluorescently labelled vedolizumab, vedo-800CW, and identify its target cells using fluorescence molecular imaging (FMI)., Design: Forty three FMI procedures were performed, which consisted of macroscopic in vivo assessment during endoscopy, followed by macroscopic and microscopic ex vivo imaging. In phase A, patients received an intravenous dose of 4.5 mg, 15 mg vedo-800CW or no tracer prior to endoscopy. In phase B, patients received 15 mg vedo-800CW preceded by an unlabelled (sub)therapeutic dose of vedolizumab., Results: FMI quantification showed a dose-dependent increase in vedo-800CW fluorescence intensity in inflamed tissues, with 15 mg (153.7 au (132.3-163.7)) as the most suitable tracer dose compared with 4.5 mg (55.3 au (33.6-78.2)) (p=0.0002). Moreover, the fluorescence signal decreased by 61% when vedo-800CW was administered after a therapeutic dose of unlabelled vedolizumab, suggesting target saturation in the inflamed tissue. Fluorescence microscopy and immunostaining showed that vedolizumab penetrated the inflamed mucosa and was associated with several immune cell types, most prominently with plasma cells., Conclusion: These results indicate the potential of FMI to determine the local distribution of drugs in the inflamed target tissue and identify drug target cells, providing new insights into targeted agents for their use in IBD., Trial Registration Number: NCT04112212., Competing Interests: Competing interests: GD received research grants from Royal DSM, Takeda and Janssen Pharmaceuticals and speaker fees from AbbVie, Pfizer, Takeda and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. EAMF is supported by a ZonMW Clinical Fellowship grant (project number 90719075) and has received an unrestricted research grant from Takeda. MD and SJ are employees and shareholders of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Mirikizumab is a humanized anti-interleukin-23p19 monoclonal antibody being developed for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease. We characterized the relationship of mirikizumab systemic exposure with efficacy and safety end points in patients with UC using phase II (NCT02589665) and III (NCT03518086, NCT03524092) trial data. Exposure-response models were developed for clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic remission, and change in modified Mayo score following induction (50-1,000 mg i.v. every 4 weeks) and maintenance (200 mg s.c. every 4 or 12 weeks) treatment. These models evaluated observed and pharmacokinetic model-predicted mirikizumab exposures as the exposure measure. Key safety event rates were compared across mirikizumab exposure quartiles in the phase III trial. Mirikizumab efficacy in patients with UC showed an apparent positive association with systemic exposure following both induction and maintenance. However, further analysis found this relationship to be overstated by the presence of confounding factors that were not among the tested patient covariates. While prior biologic experience and baseline disease severity showed statistically significant influences on estimated placebo effect, no patient factors affected the mirikizumab effect parameters in any of the phase III exposure-response models. There was no apparent mirikizumab concentration relationship with any adverse event of special interest. When the phase II and III data and confounding are considered together, efficacy was unlikely to be strongly affected by variation in exposures across individual patients at the phase III dose. Together with the previously demonstrated mirikizumab exposure insensitivity to patient factors, these findings indicate that mirikizumab dose adjustment to patient characteristics is not required., (© 2024 Eli Lilly and Company. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Objective: Pharmacological prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatectomy is open to debate. The present study compares clinically significant POPF rates in patients randomized between somatostatin versus octreotide as prophylactic treatment., Methods: Multicentric randomized controlled open study in patient's candidate for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP) comparing somatostatin continuous intravenous infusion for 7 days versus octreotid 100 μg, every 8 hours subcutaneous injection for 7 days, stratified by procedure (PD vs DP) and size of the main pancreatic duct (>4 mm) on grade B/C POPF rates at 90 days based on an intention-to-treat analysis., Results: Of 763 eligible patients, 651 were randomized: 327 in the octreotide arm and 324 in the somatostatin arm, with comparable the stratification criteria - type of surgery and main pancreatic duct dilatation. Most patients had PD (n=480; 73.8%), on soft/normal pancreas (n=367; 63.2%) with a nondilated main pancreatic duct (n=472; 72.5%), most often for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n=311; 47.8%). Almost all patients had abdominal drainage (n=621; 96.1%) and 121 (19.5%) left the hospital with the drain in place (median length of stay=16 days). A total of 153 patients (23.5%) developed a grade B/C POPF with no difference between both groups: 24.1%: somatostatin arm and 22.9%: octreotide arm (χ 2 test, P =0.73, ITT analysis). Absence of statistically significant difference persisted after adjustment for stratification variables and in per-protocol analysis., Conclusion: Continuous intravenous somatostatin is not statistically different from subcutaneous octreotide in the prevention of grade B/C POPF after pancreatectomy., Findings: In the PREFIPS Randomized Clinical Trial including 651 patients, a total of 153 patients (23.5%) developed a grade B/C POPF with no significant difference between both groups: 24.1%: somatostatin arm and 22.9%: octreotide arm (χ 2 test, P =0.73, ITT analysis). Absence of statistically significant difference persisted after adjustment for stratification variables and in per-protocol analysis., Competing Interests: S.G. reported grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support fomr IPSEN, Mylan, Mayoli, Novartis. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Data on infliximab efficacy in bio-exposed patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are limited., Aims: To evaluate infliximab effectiveness and its predictors in UC patients with prior exposure to subcutaneous (SC) anti-TNF agent., Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study (8 centers), we included all consecutive UC patients with prior exposure to subcutaneous anti-TNF, starting infliximab for symptomatic UC, excluding acute severe colitis. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFREM) was assessed at week 14 (W14) and W52 while endoscopic improvement (CFREM + endoscopic Mayo score≤1) was evaluated at W14., Results: Overall, 104 patients were included (pancolitis=54.8%, primary failure to subcutaneous anti-TNF=57.4%, concomitant immunosuppressant=53.8%, median partial Mayo score at baseline=7[5-8]). The rate of CFREM was 33.6% (35/104) at W14 and 40.4% (42/104) at W52. At W14, endoscopic improvement was achieved in 29.8%(31/104). In multivariable analysis, concomitant immunosuppressant was associated with higher rate of CFREM at W14(OR=2.83[1.06-7.54], p = 0.037) and W52(OR=2.68[1.16-6.22];p = 0.021), while primary failure to a previous subcutaneous anti-TNF agent led to lower rate of CFREM at W14 (OR=0.37[0.14-0.98], p = 0.046). After a median follow-up of 20.9 months[11.7-33.7]), 50.0%(52/104) patients had discontinued infliximab., Conclusion: Infliximab is an effective option in UC patients previously exposed to prior subcutaneous anti-TNF agent and should be used with concomitant immunosuppressant., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Objective: To compare polyethylene glycol 4000 versus lactulose in chronic constipation during pregnancy., Methods: Women at 28-32 weeks' gestation attending antenatal clinic for routine care were screened using the Rome IV chronic constipation criterion. Eligible women were approached and consented. Participants were randomized to oral polyethylene glycol (10 g/day) or lactulose (10 g/day) for 4 weeks. A bowel movement diary was kept and outcomes using the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms questionnaire (PAC-SYM), Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire (PAC-QoL) and Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), which were evaluated at the start and end of the four-week period. Relative risks (RR) were determined for the coprimary outcomes of complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) and PAC-SYM mean score improvement (decrease in score of >1 from the baseline)., Results: A total of 4323 women underwent screening, of which 780 fulfilled the Rome IV criterion, and 360 consented to participate (180 randomized to PEG and lactulose, respectively). Data from 247 women who completed the study were analyzed. CSBM was achieved in 107/124 (86.3%) versus 102/123 (82.9%) (RR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.93-1.16, P = 0.464) for PEG and lactulose trial arms, respectively. PAC-SYM mean score improvement was 62/118 (52.5%) in the PEG arm versus 44/118 (37.3%) in the lactulose arm (RR 1.40, 95% CI: 1.05-1.88). Of secondary outcomes, a significant difference was found in favor of PEG, with respect to PAC-SYM abdominal symptoms subscale, normal stool versus loose stool consistency and side effects of vomiting and diarrhea. After controlling for parity, baseline PAC-SYM, PAC-QoL scores, characteristics different at baseline, only diarrhea and loose stools remained significant., Conclusion: Both PEG 4000 and lactulose are effective laxatives in pregnancy with similar performance after adjusted analysis. Diarrhea and loose stools are less frequently reported with PEG., (© 2024 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.)

Background and Aims: Despite intravenous (IV) vedolizumab being established for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the novel subcutaneous (SC) route of administration may provide numerous incentives to switch. However, large-scale real-world data regarding the long-term safety and effectiveness of this strategy are lacking., Methods: IBD patients on IV vedolizumab across 11 UK sites agreed to transition to SC injections or otherwise continued IV treatment. Data regarding clinical disease activity (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index, partial Mayo score, and modified Harvey-Bradshaw Index), biochemical markers (C-reactive protein and calprotectin), quality of life (IBD control), adverse events, treatment persistence, and disease-related outcomes (namely corticosteroid use, IBD-related hospitalization, and IBD-related surgery) were retrospectively collected from prospectively maintained clinical records at baseline and weeks 8, 24, and 52., Results: Data from 563 patients (187 [33.2%] Crohn's disease, 376 [66.8%] ulcerative colitis; 410 [72.8%] SC, 153 [27.2%] IV) demonstrated no differences in disease activity, remission rates, and quality of life between the SC and IV groups at all time points. Drug persistence at week 52 was similar (81.1% vs 81.2%; P = .98), as were rates of treatment alteration due to either active disease (12.2% vs 8.9%; P = .38) or adverse events (3.3% vs 6.3%; P = .41). At week 52, there were equivalent rates of adverse events (9.8% vs 7.8%; P = .572) and disease-related outcomes. IBD control scores were equivalent in both IV-IV and IV-SC groups., Conclusions: Switching to SC vedolizumab appears as effective, safe, and well tolerated as continued IV treatment and maintains comparable disease control and quality of life as IV treatment at 52 weeks., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFis) are used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between neurological adverse events (AEs) and TNFi use., Methods: Data of TNFis indicated for IBD were collected from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from the marketed date to the second quarter of 2023. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) and a Bayesian confidence propagation neural network were used to identify signals., Results: A total of 4,964 neurological AEs were reported in the IBD population. Infliximab had 3 signals, including demyelination [ROR (95% CI): 1.69 (1.33,2.15)], meningitis listeria [ROR (95% CI): 5.05 (3.52,7.25)], and optic neuritis [ROR (95% CI): 1.72 (1.3,2.26)]. The signals for adalimumab were gait disturbance [ROR (95% CI): 1.43 (1.32,1.56)] and muscular weakness [ROR (95% CI): 1.4 (1.27,1.55)]. A peripheral neuropathy signal was found for adalimumab [ROR (95% CI): 1.34 (1.18,1.53)] and certolizumab pegol [ROR (95% CI): 1.49 (1.07,2.08)]. However, there were no signals among neurological AEs for golimumab., Conclusion: Neurological signals were detected for TNFi use, indicating that the risk of neurological AEs requires additional attention in clinical use of TNFis.

Introduction: A substantial proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on intravenous infliximab require dose intensification. Accessing additional intravenous infliximab is labour-intensive and expensive, depending on insurance and pharmaceutical reimbursement. Observational data suggest that subcutaneous infliximab may offer a convenient and safe alternative to maintain disease remission in patients requiring dose-intensified infliximab. A prospective, controlled trial is required to confirm that subcutaneous infliximab is as effective as dose-intensified intravenous infliximab, to identify predictors of disease flare and to establish the role of subcutaneous infliximab therapeutic drug monitoring., Methods and Analysis: The DISCUS-IBD trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label non-inferiority study comparing the rate of disease flares in participants randomised to continue dose-intensified intravenous infliximab to those switched to subcutaneous infliximab after 48 weeks. Participants are adult patients with IBD in sustained corticosteroid-free remission on any regimen of dose-intensified infliximab up to a maximum of 10 mg/kg 4-weekly intravenously. Participants allocated to intravenous infliximab will continue infliximab at the same dose-intensified regimen they were receiving at study enrolment. Subcutaneous infliximab dosing will be stratified by prior intravenous infliximab dosing. Clinical (Harvey-Bradshaw Index, partial Mayo score), biochemical (C reactive protein, faecal calprotectin), pharmacokinetic (drug-level±antidrug antibodies) and qualitative data are collected 12-weekly until study conclusion at week 48. 13 sites across Australia will participate in recruitment to reach a calculated sample size of 120 participants., Ethics and Dissemination: Multisite ethics approval was obtained from the Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) at The Alfred Hospital under a National Mutual Acceptance (NMA) agreement (HREC/90559/Alfred-2022; Local Reference: Project 618/22, version 1.6, 2 March 2023). Findings will be reported at national and international gastroenterology meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. DISCUS-IBD was prospectively registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) prior to commencing recruitment., Trial Registration Number: ACTRN12622001458729., Competing Interests: Competing interests: RDL has received conference fees from Janssen and Celltrion Healthcare. AS has received speaker fees from Sandoz and received research support and advisory fees from AbbVie, Pfizer, and Arrow Pharmaceuticals. GJW has served as a speaker, a consultant or an advisory board member for Janssen, Galapagos, AbbVie, Ferring, Dr Falk Pharma, Nova Labs and Sandoz. GTM has received educational grants or research support from GESA, The Gutsy Group, NHMRC, MRFF, AbbVie, Janssen, Pfizer, Shire and Takeda; speaker fees from AbbVie, Ferring, Janssen, Orphan, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Shire and Takeda and has serve on advisory boards for AbbVie, Emerge, Eli-Lilly, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, Orphan, MSD, Pfizer, Shire and Takeda. KL declares speaker fees, advisory Board fees and/or conference travel/registration support from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Dr Falk, Ferring, Gilead, Guidepoint, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, Norgine, Pfizer, Sandoz, Takeda and the RAH Research Fund. JA has served as a speaker, a consultant and an advisory board member for, and has received research funding from, Abbott, AbbVie, Allergan, Anatara, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Celgene, Falk, Ferring, Gilead, Hospira, Immunic, ImmunsanT, Janssen, MSD, Nestle, Progenity, Pfizer, Sandoz, Shire, Takeda, Vifor, RAH Research Fund, The Hospital Research Fund with all monies received by her department for research support. YKA reports grants from Janssen, during the conduct of the study; has received speaking and consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Chiesi, Dr Falk, Ferring, Janssen, Pfizer, Sandoz, Shire and Takeda; served on advisory boards for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Janssen, NPS Medicine wise, Microba and received research and educational funding from Abbvie, Celltrion, Dr Falk, Janssen, Pfizer, Sandoz and Takeda. RVB has received grant/research support/speaker fees from AbbVie, Ferring, Janssen, Shire, Takeda, Bristol Myer Squibb and Emerge Health; and is a shareholder in Biomebank. SC declares advisory board participation, speaker fees, educational support and/or research support for Liverpool Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District (SWSLHD) Academic Unit or Crohn’s Colitis Cure from: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Chiesi, Eli-Lilly, Dr Falk, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Organon, Pfizer, Sandoz, Takeda and non-pharmacological research support from Agency for Clinical Innovation, Gastroenterological Society of Australia, The Leona M and Harry B Helmsley Charitable Trust, Medical Research Future Fund, SWSLHD, Sydney Partnership for Health, Research and Enterprise (SPHERE). MG has served on the advisory board of Pfizer and has received speaker fees, research or travel grants from AbbVie, Celltrion, Dr Falk, Janssen, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Takeda. EKW declares speaker and consulting fees from AbbVie, BMS, Celltrion, Falk, Ferring, Janssen, Pfizer and research funding/support from AbbVie, Ferring, Janssen. JPS has received conference fees from Janssen, BMS, Takeda, educational grants from Pfizer, speaker fees from AbbVie, Takeda and Pfizer and an unrestricted grant from Tillots. PDC has served as a consultant, an advisory board member or a speaker for AbbVie, Baxter, Ferring, Janssen, Celltrion, Emerge Health, Shire and Takeda and received research support from Ferring, Shire, Janssen, AbbVie, and Takeda. MGW has received educational grants and speakers fees from AbbVie, Takeda and Ferring; travel grants from Pfizer; and has served on advisory boards for AbbVie. MPS has received educational grants or research support from Ferring, Orphan and Gilead; speakers fees from Janssen, AbbVie, Ferring, Takeda, Pfizer and Shire; and has served on advisory boards for Janssen, Takeda, Pfizer, Celgene, AbbVie, MSD, Emerge Health, Gilead and BMS. JM, PH, RBG, DC, MS, EC, LT, GH and AB declare no relevant competing interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Several studies associate the presence of higher serum concentrations of infliximab (IFX) with fistula healing in perianal Crohn's disease (CD). This study aimed to evaluate serum IFX concentrations in patients with perianal fistulizing CD (PFCD) in the presence or absence of general, clinical, and radiological activities., Methods: This was a cross-sectional study in patients with PFCD during maintenance treatment with IFX from two centers. Serum IFX concentrations were measured before their next infusion and anal fistulas were evaluated by clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), whenever possible, performed 90 days before or after serum collection. According to clinical scores, radiological activity, and disease markers, patients were classified as in remission or active disease. Mean serum IFX concentrations were compared between the groups., Results: Thirty-eight patients with PFCD were included. Demographic characteristics were similar in patients with remission or active disease. The overall mean serum IFX concentration of the entire sample (n = 38) was 5.21 ± 4.75 μg/mL (median 3.63; IQR 1.44-8.82). Serum IFX levels were 6.25 ± 5.34 μg/mL (median 3.62; IQR 1.95-11.03) in the 23 (60.5%) patients in remission and 3.63 ± 3.24 μg/mL (median 3.63; IQR 1.32-6.43; p = 0.226) in the 15 (39 .5%) who presented active disease. When evaluating general, clinical, and radiological activity of PFCD, and deep remission in isolation, no statistical difference between the groups was observed (p = 0.226, p = 0.418, p = 0.126, and p = 0.232, respectively). The 13 (34.2%) patients with an optimized dose of IFX had significantly higher serum concentrations than the remaining 25 (65.8%) with a standard dose: 8.33 ± 4.41 μg/mL (median 8.36; IQR 3.82-11.20) vs. 3.59 ± 4.13 μg/mL (median 1.97; IQR 1.18-3.85) -p = 0.002. Patients in remission and with an optimized IFX dose had significantly higher serum IFX concentrations than those with a standard dose (p = 0.006), whereas no significant difference was observed among those with active disease (p = 0.083)., Conclusion: There were no differences in IFX serum concentrations in patients with clinical or radiological active PFCD as compared with those in remission. Patients with an optimized IFX dose had significantly higher serum concentrations than those with a standard dose. Patients in remission and with an optimized IFX dose had significantly higher serum concentrations than those with a standard dose., (© 2024. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background/aims: Studies on elective switching to the subcutaneous (SC) formulation of infliximab revealed comparable efficacy and safety and higher infliximab level than those exhibited by intravenous (IV) infliximab. However, no studies have reported on the effectiveness of SC switching in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who experienced IV infliximab failure during maintenance treatment., Methods: This retrospective study included UC patients who had been switched to SC infliximab because of IV infliximab failure, between January 2021 and January 2023. Group A was defined as having clinically and biochemically active UC (secondary loss of response), and group B consisted of patients with stable symptoms but biochemically active UC., Results: Twenty-three patients met the inclusion criteria: 15 in group A and eight in group B. The serum infliximab levels significantly increased after SC switching in both groups. The electively switched group also exhibited increased infliximab levels after SC switching. Patients in group A showed improved partial Mayo score with a significant decrease in fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein after switching. In group B, the fecal calprotectin level significantly decreased without clinical relapse after switching. A high proportion of patients (≥80%) in both groups achieved clinical and/or biochemical responses at the last follow-up. During the follow-up period, only two patients in group A discontinued SC infliximab, and only one complained of severe injection site reaction., Conclusions: In UC patients who experience IV infliximab failure during maintenance treatment, switching to SC infliximab may be a promising option because of better efficacy and safety.

Purpose of Review: To provide an overview of the current literature regarding the use of advanced combination therapy (ACT) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although the treatment of IBD has come a long way, many patients do not respond or will lose response to currently available treatments over time. ACT has been proposed as a model to create sustained remission in difficult-to-treat IBD patient populations. This review discusses the available literature supporting the use of ACT, followed by practical tips for applying this model of treatment to clinical practice., Recent Findings: Both observational and controlled evidence have demonstrated that there may be an increased benefit of ACT in specific IBD patient populations compared to advanced targeted immunomodulator (TIM) monotherapy. Additional data is required to understand how to best use combination TIMs and the long-term risks associated with this strategy., Summary: While the literature has demonstrated the potential for benefit in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, the use of ACT is currently off-label and long-term controlled data is needed. The successful application of ACT requires careful consideration of both patient and disease profiles as well as close monitoring of treatment response and adverse events., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Infliximab (IFX) biosimilars are available to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), offering cost reductions versus originator IFX in some jurisdictions. However, concerns remain regarding the efficacy and safety of originator-to-biosimilar switching. This systematic literature review evaluated safety and effectiveness of switching between IFX products in patients with IBD, including multiple switchers., Methods: Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to capture studies (2012-2022) including patients with IBD who switched between approved IFX products. Effectiveness outcomes: disease activity; disease severity; response to treatment; patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Safety outcomes: incidence and rate of adverse events (AEs); discontinuations due to AEs, failure rate; hospitalizations; surgeries. Immunogenicity outcomes (n, %): anti-drug antibodies; patients receiving concomitant immunomodulatory medication., Results: Data from 85 publications (81 observational, two randomized controlled trials) were included. Clinical effectiveness outcomes were consistent with the known profile of originator IFX with no difference after switching. There were no unexpected/serious AEs after switching, and rates of AEs were generally consistent with the known profile of IFX., Conclusions: Most studies reported that clinical, PROs, and safety outcomes for originator-to-biosimilar switching were clinically equivalent to originator responses. Limited data are available regarding multiple switches., Protocol Registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42021289144.

Purpose of Review: This review details the three new agents, including two novel mechanisms of action, approved to treat Crohn's disease in recent years. We review efficacy, safety, prescribing information, and available data on positioning these new therapies., Recent Findings: Risankizumab and upadacitinib are novel mechanisms of action approved to treat moderate to severe Crohn's disease. Risankizumab targets the cytokine interleukin-23. Upadacitinib is a selective Janus kinase-1 inhibitor approved for use in individuals who have previously failed or are intolerant to an anti-TNF agent. Subcutaneous infliximab provides a novel method of administering maintenance dosing of a longstanding and efficacious therapy., Summary: Risankizumab has shown efficacy in both biologic naïve and biologic experienced populations. The SEQUENCE trial shows superiority of risankizumab over ustekinumab for disease response in patients who have previously failed an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent. Upadacitinib has shown good efficacy in clinical trials even in the setting of a mandated steroid taper during induction. Subcutaneous infliximab maintenance therapy appears noninferior to i.v. infliximab and shows good treatment persistence in real world transitions. Additional data is needed to better understand how to position these therapies., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a severe neuropsychiatric complication of liver diseases characterized by neuroinflammation. The efficacies of nonabsorbable rifaximin (RIF) and lactulose (LAC) have been well documented in the treatment of HE. [ 18 F]PBR146 is a translocator protein (TSPO) radiotracer used for in vivo neuroinflammation imaging. This study investigated anti-neuroinflammation effect of RIF or/and LAC in chronic HE rats by [ 18 F]PBR146 micro-PET/CT., Methods: Bile duct ligation (BDL) operation induced chronic HE models, and this study included Sham+normal saline (NS), BDL+NS, BDL+RIF, BDL+LAC, and BDL+RIF+LAC groups. Behavioral assessment was performed to analyze the motor function, and fecal samples were collected after successfully established the chronic HE model (more than 28 days post-surgery). In addition, fecal samples collection and micro-PET/CT scans were performed sequentially. And we also collected the blood plasma, liver, intestinal, and brain samples after sacrificing the rats for further biochemical and pathological analyses., Results: The RIF- and/or LAC-treated BDL rats showed similar behavioral results with Sham+NS group, while the treatment could not reverse the biliary obstruction resulting in sustained liver injury. The RIF or/and LAC treatments can inhibit IFN-γ and IL-10 productions. The global brain uptake values of [ 18 F]PBR146 in BDL+NS group was significantly higher than other groups (p < .0001). The brain regions analysis showed that the basal ganglia, hippocampus, and cingulate cortex had radiotracer uptake differences among groups (all p < .05), which were consistent with the brain immunohistochemistry results. Sham+NS group was mainly enriched in Christensenella, Coprobacillus, and Pseudoflavonifractor. BDL+NS group was mainly enriched in Barnesiella, Alloprevotella, Enterococcus, and Enterorhabdus. BDL+RIF+LAC group was enriched in Parabacteroides, Bacteroides, Allobaculum, Bifidobacterium, and Parasutterella., Conclusions: RIF or/and LAC had anti-neuroinflammation in BDL-induced chronic HE rats with gut microbiota alterations. The [ 18 F]PBR146 could be used for monitoring RIF or/and LAC treatment efficacy of chronic HE rats., (© 2024 The Author(s). Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)