Search

OBJECTIVES The aim of this single-centre prospective study was to assess the impact of preoperative mitral valve regurgitation (MR) on outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS From June 2007 to January 2011, 176 consecutive patients underwent TAVI at our institution. Patients were divided into two groups according to the degree of MR: <2+, the NoMR group (133 patients); ≥2+, the MR group (43 patients). Clinical and echocardiographic examination were performed before the procedure, at discharge, 1, 3, 6, 12 months after TAVI and yearly thereafter. The mean follow-up was 10.4 ± 7.7 months (range 1–36). RESULTS MR patients had higher EuroSCORE (27 ± 16 vs. 20 ± 11%, P < 0.001), lower ejection fraction (49 ± 13 vs. 57 ± 12%, P = 0.001), higher systolic pulmonary pressure (50 ± 17 vs. 39 ± 10 mmHg, P < 0.001) and larger left ventricular volumes (end-diastolic volume index: 78 ± 29 vs. 66 ± 20 ml/m2, P = 0.002) than NoMR. Hospital mortality was 9.3% (four patients) and 3% (four patients) in MR and NoMR groups, respectively (P = 0.10). The Kaplan–Meier survival at 20 months was 78 ± 8 and 75 ± 6% in MR and NoMR groups, respectively (P: n.s.). At follow-up, the degree of MR in the MR group decreased to trivial-mild in 28% of patients. Patients of both groups experienced a significant reduction in the New York Hear Association class, being in class I–II in 91% of cases. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing TAVI with preoperative MR ≥ 2+ have a higher surgical risk profile and a trend towards higher hospital mortality. MR was not identified as a risk factor for mortality. At follow–up, a reduction in MR and an improvement of echocardiographic parameters were observed in the MR group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although bifurcation stenting can be often managed with a simple provisional approach, in some settings, more complex techniques are appropriate. Based on our clinical experience and on data from literature, we propose a simple algorithm that may assist in selecting cases for elective double stenting. We found that, when the side branch is of adequate dimensions and affected by significant disease (longer than 10 mm and/or with presence of ostial calcifications), double stenting is associated with a lower incidence of adverse events, compared with provisional stenting., Competing Interests: Disclosures: Imad Sheiban, Filippo Figini, Valeria Gasparetto, Fabrizio D’Ascenzo, Claudio Moretti and Filippo Leonardo have no financial or non-financial relationships or activities to declare in relation to this article., (© Touch Medical Media 2021.)

Background: Although oral P2Y 12 inhibitors are key in the management of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, the optimal timing of their administration is not well defined., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare downstream and upstream oral P2Y 12 inhibitors administration strategies in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive treatment., Methods: We performed a randomized, adaptive, open-label, multicenter clinical trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive pre-treatment with ticagrelor before angiography (upstream group) or no pre-treatment (downstream group). Patients in the downstream group undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were further randomized to receive ticagrelor or prasugrel. The primary hypothesis was the superiority of the downstream versus the upstream strategy on the combination of efficacy and safety events (net clinical benefit)., Results: We randomized 1,449 patients to downstream or upstream oral P2Y 12 inhibitor administration. A pre-specified stopping rule for futility at interim analysis led the trial to be stopped. The rate of the primary endpoint, a composite of death due to vascular causes; nonfatal myocardial infarction or nonfatal stroke; and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3, 4, and 5 bleeding through day 30, did not differ significantly between the downstream and upstream groups (percent absolute risk reduction: -0.46; 95% repeated confidence interval: -2.90 to 1.90). These results were confirmed among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (72% of population) and regardless of the timing of coronary angiography (within or after 24 h from enrollment)., Conclusions: Downstream and upstream oral P2Y 12 inhibitor administration strategies were associated with low incidence of ischemic and bleeding events and minimal numeric difference of event rates between treatment groups. These findings led to premature interruption of the trial and suggest the unlikelihood of enhanced efficacy of 1 strategy over the other. (Downstream Versus Upstream Strategy for the Administration of P2Y 12 Receptor Blockers In Non-ST Elevated Acute Coronary Syndromes With Initial Invasive Indication [DUBIUS]; NCT02618837)., Competing Interests: Author Relationship With Industry This work was funded by the Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (SICI-GISE). Dr. Tarantini has received Speakers Bureau fees from AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Eli Lilly. Dr. Mojoli has received individual payments for participating on the Advisory Boards of The Medicines Company and Abbott Vascular; and has been a speaker at scientific congresses from AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Chiesi Farmaceutici, and Servier; and his institution has received an unconditioned research grant from Chiesi Farmaceutici. Dr. Varbella has received consulting fees/honoraria from AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Servier, Amgen, Sanofi, Piam, Alvi Medica, Teleflex, and Stenty. Dr. Caporale has received an Advisory Board fee from AstraZeneca. Dr. Rigattieri has received a consulting fee from AstraZeneca; and has received a Speakers Bureau fee from Eli Lilly. Dr. Andò has received individual payments as a consultant, for serving on the Advisory Board, or as a speaker at scientific congresses from AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Pfizer–Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Biosensors. Dr. Saia has received Speakers Bureau fees from AstraZeneca and Daiichi-Sankyo. Dr. Ferlini has received individual payment as a consultant, for serving on the Advisory Board, or as a speaker at scientific congresses from AstraZeneca, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Bayer, Biosensors, Sanofi, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr. Angiolillo has received consulting fees or honoraria as an individual from Abbott, Amgen, Aralez, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Haemonetics, Janssen, Merck, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, and The Medicines Company; has received payment as an individual for participation in review activities from CeloNova and St. Jude Medical; and has received institutional payments for grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, CeloNova, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli-Lilly, Gilead, Idorsia, Janssen, Matsutani Chemical Industry Co., Merck, Novartis, Osprey Medical, Renal Guard Solutions, and the Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Elevated values of systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) represent a common finding in patients with aortic stenosis and severe left ventricular hypertrophy. Prognostic impact of sPAP and its potential improvement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains to be determined., Methods and Results: This is a multicenter retrospective registry in five European institutions. All consecutive patients undergoing TAVI were enrolled, and divided into two groups according to sPAP evaluated with echocardiography: ≤40 mm Hg and >40 mm Hg. All-cause mortality at follow-up of at least 1 year was the primary endpoint, while 30-day mortality, periprocedural complications, myocardial infarction, stroke, and reintervention rates at follow-up were the secondary endpoints. Among 674 patients enrolled, a total of 319 (47%) had sPAP >40 mm Hg. This was associated with higher mortality at 30 days (4.5% vs 8.5%; P=.03) and at a median follow-up of 477 days (17% vs 26%; P=.03). Improvement of sPAP was reported in 113 patients (27%), occurring more frequently in absence of moderate or severe mitral regurgitation and of right ventricle dysfunction. With multivariate adjustment, reduced renal function, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and sPAP >40 mm Hg were independent predictors of all-cause mortality, improvement in sPAP values was related to a better survival, while ejection fraction was not., Conclusion: Elevated values of sPAP represent a common finding in patients undergoing TAVI. This parameter, along with its improvement, may be used to stratify risk and determine prognosis for patients undergoing TAVI.

Introduction: Despite encouraging short-term and mid-term results, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) interventions are still burdened from high rates of adverse events, stressing the need for accurate predictive risk instruments. We compared available surgical risk scores to describe unfavorable outcomes after TAVI., Methods: The Age, Creatinine, and Ejection fraction (ACEF) score, the logistic Euroscore, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Mortality score (STS) were appraised for their independent power of prediction and for their accuracy (C-index) to predict 30-day and medium-term mortality, according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium., Results: Nine hundred and sixty-two patients were included. All the scores demonstrated a moderate positive correlation. The closest correlation was observed between the STS score and Euroscore. After logistic regression analysis, STS score and Logistic Euroscore provided independent prediction for short-term all-cause mortality [P = 0.02, odds ratio (OR) 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.31 and P = 0.027, OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.405]. For in-hospital complications, only STS score performed significantly (P = 0.005, OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.06). ACEF, Euroscore, and STS score showed low accuracy for 30-day all-cause mortality (area under the curve 0.6, 0.44-0.75; vs. 0.53, 0.42-0.61; vs. 0.62, 0.52-0.71, respectively), whereas STS score performed better for in-hospital complications (0.59, 0.55-0.64). Moreover, after Cox-multivariate adjustments, only ACEF score was near to significance to predict all-cause mortality at mid-term (OR 1.7; 0.8-2.9; P = 0.058), showing the highest accuracy (0.63, 0.55-0.71)., Conclusion: In TAVI patients, ACEF score, STS score and Logistic Euroscore provided only a moderate correlation and a low accuracy both for 30-day and medium-term outcomes. Dedicated scores are needed to properly tailor time and kind of approach.

An 88-year-old man with severe aortic stenosis and normal left ventricular ejection fraction underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation via a transapical approach, without periprocedural complications. Some 16 months later the patient was readmitted because of worsening dyspnea, when left ventricular dysfunction due to apical akinesia was identified. A gated, rest-only myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography (G-SPECT) demonstrated apical hypoperfusion that persisted after attenuation correction. Necrosis involved the apical and mid-inferior wall, the apical lateral wall, and the apical segment.

We present the case of an 83-year-old man who was admitted with New York Heart Association class III dyspnea and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. Because of high surgical risk, a percutaneous treatment of both mitral and aortic valvulopathies was planned. This case reports the feasibility of a totally percutaneous approach in combined rheumatic mitral and aortic valve disease for patients with prohibitive surgical risk.

During trascatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) the native valve is not removed but crushed. Thus, a slight prosthesis insufficiency is not uncommon and has been reported in about 70% of patients for both available types of percutaneous valves. However, the definition of clinically "significant" valve regurgitation is not fully established yet. In most cases, aortic insufficiency is mild and clinical acceptable, however, severe insufficiency can occur. Paravalvular insufficiency is usually prevalent, and it may be the consequence of prosthesis/patient mismatch due to an undersizing of the implanted device or to an incomplete expansion of the prosthesis stent frame, or also to incorrect site of prosthesis implantation. Thus, an accurate assessment of the aortic valve annulus before TAVI is mandatory in order to select the optimal size of the valve. The presence of large calcium burden or bicuspid valve as well as the correct implantation of the device are other key determinants of final valve insufficiency. When severe regurgitation is present, an integration of hemodynamic, angiographic, transthoracic and TEE data is necessary to tailor the best clinical decision on a per-patient basis.