1. Phase-III Clinical Trial of Fluorine-18 Flurpiridaz Positron Emission Tomography for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease
- Author
-
Joel Lazewatsky, Rob S. Beanlands, Gary V. Heller, Daniel S. Berman, Jamshid Maddahi, Cesare Orlandi, James E. Udelson, Timothy M. Bateman, and Juhani Knuuti
- Subjects
Male ,Fluorine Radioisotopes ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Myocardial Perfusion Imaging ,Reproducibility of Results ,Technetium ,Coronary Artery Disease ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Coronary artery disease ,Clinical trial ,Myocardial perfusion imaging ,Sex Factors ,Positron emission tomography ,Positron-Emission Tomography ,Exercise Test ,medicine ,Humans ,Female ,Obesity ,Radiopharmaceuticals ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Nuclear medicine ,business - Abstract
Fluorine-18 flurpiridaz is a novel positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging tracer.This study sought to assess the diagnostic efficacy of flurpiridaz PET versus technetium-99m-labeled single photon emission computed tomography SPECT for the detection and evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD), defined as ≥50% stenosis by quantitative invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Flurpiridaz safety was also evaluated.In this phase III prospective multicenter clinical study, 795 patients with known or suspected CAD from 72 clinical sites in the United States, Canada, and Finland were enrolled. A total of 755 patients were evaluable, and the mean age was 62.3 ± 9.5 years, 31% were women, 55% had body mass index ≥30 kg/mSensitivity of flurpiridaz PET (for detection of ≥50% stenosis by ICA) was 71.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.0% to 76.3%), significantly (p 0.001) higher than SPECT (53.7% [95% CI: 48.5% to 58.8%]), while specificity did not meet the prespecified noninferiority criterion (76.2% [95% CI: 71.8% to 80.1%] vs. 86.6% [95% CI: 83.2% to 89.8%]; p = NS). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated superior discrimination of CAD by flurpiridaz PET versus SPECT in the overall population, in women, obese patients, and patients undergoing pharmacological stress testing (p 0.001 for all). Flurpiridaz PET was superior to SPECT for defect size (p 0.001), image quality (p 0.001), diagnostic certainty (p 0.001), and radiation exposure (6.1 ± 0.4 mSv vs. 13.4 ± 3.2 mSv; p 0.001). Flurpiridaz PET was safe and well tolerated.Flurpiridaz PET myocardial perfusion imaging shows promise as a new tracer for CAD detection and assessment of women, obese patients, and patients undergoing pharmacological stress testing. A second phase III Food and Drug Administration trial is ongoing. (A Phase 3 Multi-center Study to Assess PET Imaging of Flurpiridaz F 18 Injection in Patients with CAD; NCT01347710).
- Published
- 2020