Search

The recommended US infant immunization schedule includes doses of diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis (DTaP), inactivated poliovirus (IPV), Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and hepatitis B virus (HepB) during the first 6 months of life. Little information is available about the timing of associated, complementary monovalent vaccine administration in infants receiving DTaP-based pentavalent combination vaccines.This was a retrospective cohort study of infants born between July 1, 2010, and June 30, 2018, in the US MarketScan commercial claims and encounters database. Descriptive statistics were used to assess vaccine administration patterns. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to explore factors associated with coadministration of DTaP-IPV/Hib and HepB.Among infants who received DTaP-HepB-IPV (n = 129,885), 93.7% had claims for at least 2 Hib doses; most (91.5%-98.3%) of these doses were administered on the same day as DTaP-HepB-IPV doses. Among infants who received DTaP-IPV/Hib (n=214,172), 95.3% had claims for ≥2 doses of HepB. Although coverage was high, 59.2% received the second HepB dose on the same day as the first DTaP-IPV/Hib dose, and 44.6% received the third dose of HepB on the same day as the third DTaP-IPV/Hib dose. Differences in coadministration of the second and third HepB doses with DTaP-IPV/Hib were associated with the region of residence, provider type, health plan type and coadministration of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and rotavirus vaccine.Almost all infants received the appropriate, complementary monovalent vaccine series. However, this study found variability in the timing of HepB doses in relation to DTaP-IPV/Hib doses with many infants not completing the HepB series until 9 months of age.

To understand physician preferences for various attributes of pediatric combination vaccines. An online survey was completed by 400 US physicians (pediatricians and family physicians) who routinely administer vaccines to infants aged 1–12 months in outpatient settings. Respondents completed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) by selecting their preferred options from different hypothetical vaccine profiles with systematic variation in the levels of five attributes: vaccine presentation, number of injections administered at a single visit, completion rates, timeliness rates (within 30 days of recommended age), and years of availability for routine use, assuming similar cost, safety, and efficacy. Odds ratios and relative attribute importance scores were estimated using a random parameters logit model. Physicians (mean age 50.4 years, 52.5% women) preferred combination vaccines that reduced the number of injections administered at a single visit, facilitated higher completion and timeliness rates for the primary DTaP series, were available as a pre-filled syringe rather than a vial needing reconstitution and had been available for routine use for more than 1 year. All odds ratios were statistically significant. Physicians were twice as likely to prefer administering three injections in a single visit instead of four. The most important attribute was the number of injections administered at a single visit (relative importance 38%), followed by timeliness, completion rates, and vaccine presentation; years a vaccine has been available was the least important attribute. US physicians prefer pediatric combination vaccines that enable fewer injections to be administered at a single visit, facilitate higher completion and timeliness rates, are offered as a pre-filled syringe, and have been available for routine use for more than 1 year. The most important attribute of pediatric combination vaccines was a reduction in the number of injections administered at a single visit.

While invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is uncommon, it can result in serious sequelae and even death. In 2018 in the United States, the incidence of IMD per 100,000 people was 0.03 among adolescents 11-15 years of age, 0.10 among persons 16-23 years of age, and 0.83 among infants 1 year of age. Serogroup B accounted for 86%, 62%, and 66% of cases, respectively, in those age groups. Currently, routine meningococcal vaccination covering serogroups ACWY (MenACWY) is recommended in the United States for all adolescents at 11-12 years of age, with a booster dose at 16 years of age, whereas a meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccine series is recommended for persons 16-23 years of age under the shared clinical decision-making paradigm. The MenACWY vaccination program in adolescents has been successful in reducing disease burden, but does not prevent disease caused by serogroup B, which accounts for more than half of IMD cases. There are currently no approved vaccines that cover all of the most common disease-causing meningococcal serogroups, which are A, B, C, W, and Y. A pentavalent MenABCWY vaccine that is constituted from 2 licensed meningococcal vaccines-MenB-FHbp and MenACWY-TT-is being investigated in healthy persons ≥ 10-25 years of age. The addition of a MenABCWY vaccine is the next natural step in the incremental meningococcal immunization program in the United States to improve protection against the most common serogroup causing IMD, with no increase in the number of immunizations needed. With high uptake, routine use of MenABCWY could reduce IMD cases and associated mortality, the rate of long-term physical and psychosocial sequelae in survivors, and costs associated with controlling outbreaks, particularly on college campuses. A MenABCWY vaccine would also reduce the number of injections required for adolescents, potentially improving compliance.

Background Few data exist on the clinical features and outcome of pediatric patients with persistent unwellness following acute COVID. Methods Norton Children’s and the University of Louisville School of Medicine opened a Post-COVID Clinic (PCC) in Oct 2020. The study cohort included all 104 patients referred to the PCC through Dec 2021. Clinical data were collected using a standardized template during routine care. Diagnostic tests and subspecialty referrals were ordered at the discretion of clinic physicians. A telephone interview in 2022 assessed long-term outcomes. Results The median age at first visit was 14 y (IQR=12,16); the age distribution of PCC patients was different from that of Pediatric Infectious Diseases Clinic (PIDC) patients in that there were few patients under 10 y. Males and females were equally represented. The racial distribution was similar to that of PIDC, but patients were more often from mid/upper socioeconomic status (using commercial insurance as a surrogate; p=0.001). The median interval from onset of COVID to the first PCC visit was 2 mo (IQR=1.5,4.4), and an increase in referrals was seen 2 mo after each COVID wave in the community (Figure 1). Most PCC patients reported good health prior to COVID. Fifty-four percent of patients experienced moderate or severe disability according to Modified Functional Disability Inventory scores at the first PCC visit (Figure 2; median score 14, IQR=6,19). Common symptoms were fatigue or lethargy (73%), headache (60%), shortness of breath or difficulty breathing (48%), exercise intolerance (47%), and chest pain (39%). Few abnormalities were found on routine diagnostic tests. Common subspecialty referrals were to Neurology, Cardiology, Pulmonology, Physical Therapy, and Psychiatry; the total number and types of referrals varied widely among patients. Most patients did not receive a specific diagnosis other than post-COVID syndrome. Sixty-three follow-up interviews were completed a median of 6 mo after the initial PCC visit; 79% of patients were improved or back to normal. Figure 1Reported COVID-19 cases in persons Figure 2 Box and whisker plot of Modified Functional Disability Inventory scores at first visit to Post-COVID Clinic. Upper and lower quartiles are marked by the top and bottom of the boxes. The median is marked by a horizontal line inside the box and the mean is shown by the “x.” Top whiskers indicate the largest value ≤ the 3rd quartile plus 1.5 times the interquartile range; bottom whiskers indicate the smallest value ≥ the 1st quartile minus 1.5 times the interquartile range. Open circles extending beyond the whiskers represent outliers. Disability categories are from Kashikar-Zuck S, et al. Pain 2011;152:1600-1607. Conclusion This large experience with a PCC established early in the pandemic demonstrates that symptoms of post-COVID unwellness are non-specific and varied, routine tests are seldom diagnostic, and the natural history is one of gradual recovery. Disclosures Shanna M. Barton, M.D., M.Sc., Sanofi Pasteur: Grant/Research Support Victoria A. Statler, M.D., M.Sc., Astellas: University Research Support|Gilead: University Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Sanofi: University Research Support|Seqirus: Advisor/Consultant Gary S. Marshall, MD, GlaxoSmithKline: Advisor/Consultant|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Honoraria|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Honoraria|Sanofi: Advisor/Consultant|Sanofi: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi: Honoraria|Seqirus: Advisor/Consultant|Seqirus: Grant/Research Support|Seqirus: Honoraria.

Background There are no accepted best practices for counseling vaccine-hesitant parents, and training in this area is not required in residency. In a prior study (J Pediatr 2022;241:203-11), we demonstrated that in-person training in a structured communication strategy called AIMS (Announce, Inquire, Mirror, Secure) resulted in behaviors of interest during live encounters with standardized patients (SPs) portraying vaccine-hesitant parents. We investigated whether similar effects would be seen if training and SP encounters occurred in a virtual environment. Methods Pediatrics and Medicine-Pediatrics residents were randomized to receive either AIMS or control training. Subjects underwent pre- and post-training SP encounters simulating an immunization visit for a 4-month-old. SP case materials were modified to more closely approximate well-intentioned reluctance to vaccinate and allow for more authentic interaction. Encounters were video-recorded and assessed by 3 raters using the Vaccine Hesitancy Communication Assessment (VHCA), developed and characterized in the initial study but modified based on factor analysis to improve reliability and validity. Subject confidence and SP evaluations of the encounter were assessed pre- and post-training. Investigators, subjects, SPs, and video raters were blinded to treatment allocation. Results Fifty-three subjects completed the protocol and 47 had complete video files. Subject confidence improved in both groups (Panel A). No differences in SP evaluations were detected between groups (B). Preliminary analysis demonstrated that AIMS behaviors were more commonly detected among AIMS-trained subjects than control, as evidenced by an increase in VHCA score (C). Conclusion Communication training and assessment using SPs were both successfully transitioned to a virtual environment; this opens the possibility of efficient training and assessment of residents who are not located on site. Training increased confidence non-specifically. Encounters with SPs can serve as a model to detect learned vaccine-specific communication behaviors among resident providers, but post-encounter assessments by SPs remained insensitive to differences in those behaviors despite modification of the case materials. Disclosures Shanna M. Barton, MD, M.Sc., Sanofi Pasteur: Grant/Research Support Aaron W. Calhoun, MD, FSSH, Sanofi-Pasteur: Grant/Research Support|Society for Simulation in Healthcare: Board Member|Society for Simulation in Healthcare: Honoraria Victoria A. Statler, M.D., M.Sc., Astellas: University Research Support|Gilead: University Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Sanofi: University Research Support|Seqirus: Advisor/Consultant Gary S. Marshall, MD, GlaxoSmithKline: Advisor/Consultant|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Honoraria|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Honoraria|Sanofi: Advisor/Consultant|Sanofi: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi: Honoraria|Seqirus: Advisor/Consultant|Seqirus: Grant/Research Support|Seqirus: Honoraria.

Meningococcal vaccination is recommended for patients with complement component deficiencies (CDs) in the United States. In this retrospective database study, only 4.6% and 2.2% of patients received MenACWY and MenB vaccination, respectively, within 3 years of CD diagnosis. Thus, meningococcal vaccination rates among patients with CDs need to be improved.

M-M-R®II (M-M-R II) is routinely used in many countries at 12–15 months with a second dose at 4 to 6 years of age. However, the vaccine may need to be administered at other ages due to delays in th...

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES We evaluated the economic impact of routine childhood immunization in the United States, reflecting updated vaccine recommendations and recent data on epidemiology and coverage rates. METHODS An economic model followed the 2017 US birth cohort from birth through death; impact was modeled via a decision tree for each of the vaccines recommended for children by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices as of 2017 (with annual influenza vaccine considered in scenario analysis). Using information on historic prevaccine and vaccine-era incidence and disease costs, we calculated disease cases, deaths, disease-related healthcare costs, and productivity losses without and with vaccination, as well as vaccination program costs. We estimated cases and deaths averted because of vaccination, life-years and quality-adjusted life-years gained because of vaccination, incremental costs (2019 US dollars), and the overall benefit-cost ratio (BCR) of routine childhood immunization from the societal and healthcare payer perspectives. RESULTS Over the cohort’s lifetime, routine childhood immunization prevented over 17 million cases of disease and 31 000 deaths; 853 000 life years and 892 000 quality-adjusted life-years were gained. Estimated vaccination costs ($8.5 billion) were fully offset by the $63.6 billion disease-related averted costs. Routine childhood immunization was associated with $55.1 billion (BCR of 7.5) and $13.7 billion (BCR of 2.8) in averted costs from a societal and healthcare payer perspective, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In addition to preventing unnecessary morbidity and mortality, routine childhood immunization is cost-saving. Continued maintenance of high vaccination coverage is necessary to ensure sustained clinical and economic benefits of the vaccination program.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Current routine immunizations for children aged ≤10 years in the United States in 2019 cover 14 vaccine-preventable diseases. We characterize the public-health impact of vaccination by providing updated estimates of disease incidence with and without universally recommended pediatric vaccines. METHODS Prevaccine disease incidence was obtained from published data or calculated using annual case estimates from the prevaccine period and United States population estimates during the same period. Vaccine-era incidence was calculated as the average incidence over the most recent 5 years of available surveillance data or obtained from published estimates (if surveillance data were not available). We adjusted for underreporting and calculated the percent reduction in overall and age-specific incidence for each disease. We multiplied prevaccine and vaccine-era incidence rates by 2019 United States population estimates to calculate annual number of cases averted by vaccination. RESULTS Routine immunization reduced the incidence of all targeted diseases, leading to reductions in incidence ranging from 17% (influenza) to 100% (diphtheria, Haemophilus influenzae type b, measles, mumps, polio, and rubella). For the 2019 United States population of 328 million people, these reductions equate to >24 million cases of vaccine-preventable disease averted. Vaccine-era disease incidence estimates remained highest for influenza (13 412 per 100 000) and Streptococcus pneumoniae-related acute otitis media (2756 per 100 000). CONCLUSIONS Routine childhood immunization in the United States continues to yield considerable sustained reductions in incidence across all targeted diseases. Efforts to maintain and improve vaccination coverage are necessary to continue experiencing low incidence levels of vaccine-preventable diseases.

Significance In this report we identify genetic susceptibility variants for periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome, the most common periodic fever syndrome in children. PFAPA shares risk loci at IL12A, STAT4, IL10, and CCR1-CCR3 with Behçet’s disease and recurrent aphthous stomatitis, defining a family of Behçet’s spectrum disorders. Differential HLA associations along this spectrum may determine where individual phenotypes fall among the Behçet’s spectrum disorders., Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome is the most common periodic fever syndrome in children. The disease appears to cluster in families, but the pathogenesis is unknown. We queried two European–American cohorts and one Turkish cohort (total n = 231) of individuals with PFAPA for common variants previously associated with two other oropharyngeal ulcerative disorders, Behçet’s disease and recurrent aphthous stomatitis. In a metaanalysis, we found that a variant upstream of IL12A (rs17753641) is strongly associated with PFAPA (OR 2.13, P = 6 × 10−9). We demonstrated that monocytes from individuals who are heterozygous or homozygous for this risk allele produce significantly higher levels of IL-12p70 upon IFN-γ and LPS stimulation than those from individuals without the risk allele. We also found that variants near STAT4, IL10, and CCR1-CCR3 were significant susceptibility loci for PFAPA, suggesting that the pathogenesis of PFAPA involves abnormal antigen-presenting cell function and T cell activity and polarization, thereby implicating both innate and adaptive immune responses at the oropharyngeal mucosa. Our results illustrate genetic similarities among recurrent aphthous stomatitis, PFAPA, and Behçet’s disease, placing these disorders on a common spectrum, with recurrent aphthous stomatitis on the mild end, Behçet’s disease on the severe end, and PFAPA intermediate. We propose naming these disorders Behçet’s spectrum disorders to highlight their relationship. HLA alleles may be factors that influence phenotypes along this spectrum as we found new class I and II HLA associations for PFAPA distinct from Behçet’s disease and recurrent aphthous stomatitis.

Worldwide, lifestyle and resource disparities among adolescents contribute to unmet health needs, which have crucial present and future public health implications for both adolescents and broader communities. Risk of infection among adolescents is amplified by biological, behavioral, and environmental factors; however, infectious diseases to which adolescents are susceptible are often preventable with vaccines. Beyond these concerns, there is a lack of knowledge regarding adolescent vaccination and disease risk among parents and adolescents, which can contribute to low vaccine uptake. Promising efforts have been made to improve adolescent vaccination by programs with motivational drivers and comprehensive communication with the public. In May 2017, a multidisciplinary group of experts met in Amsterdam, Netherlands, to discuss adolescent vaccine uptake, as part of an educational initiative called the Advancing Adolescent Health Spring Forum. This article presents consensus opinions resulting from the meeting, which pertain to the burden of vaccine-preventable diseases among adolescents, reasons for low vaccine uptake, and common characteristics of successful strategies for improving adolescent vaccination.Conclusion: There is an urgent “call to action,” particularly targeting healthcare providers and public health authorities, for the prioritization of adolescent vaccination as a necessary element of preventive healthcare in this age group. What is Known:• Despite increased risk of certain infectious diseases, adolescent vaccination uptake remains low. What is New:• Barriers to adolescent vaccine uptake include lack of information regarding vaccines and disease risk, health system inadequacies, and insufficient healthcare follow-up.• Successful efforts to improve adolescent vaccine uptake need cohesive leadership and involvement of multiple stakeholders, as well as youth-friendly messaging; healthcare providers and policymakers should prioritize adolescent vaccination and implement proven program strategies to improve adolescent health worldwide.

Measles, mumps, and rubella are highly contagious diseases that caused significant global mortality and morbidity in the pre-vaccine era. Since its first approval in the United States over 40 years ago, M-M-R(II) has been used in >75 countries for prevention of these diseases. The vaccine has been part of immunization programs that have achieved dramatic global reductions in case numbers and mortality rates, as well as the elimination of measles and rubella in several countries and regions. This report summarizes over four decades of global safety, immunogenicity, efficacy, and effectiveness data for the vaccine. We include studies on the use of M-M-R(II) in different age groups, concomitant use with other routine childhood vaccines, administration via different routes, persistence of immunity, and vaccine effectiveness during outbreaks of measles and mumps. We conclude that M-M-R(II) is well tolerated and has shown consistently high performance during routine use in multiple countries, in randomized controlled trials with diverse designs, and in outbreak settings, including use as measles postexposure prophylaxis. Physicians, parents, and the public can continue to have a high degree of confidence in the use of M-M-R(II) as a vital part of global public health programs.

To determine if training residents in a structured communication method elicits specific behaviors in a laboratory model of interaction with vaccine-hesitant parents.Standardized patients portraying vaccine-hesitant parents were used to assess the effectiveness of training in the Announce, Inquire, Mirror, Secure (AIMS) Method for Healthy Conversations. Blinded pediatric residents were pseudorandomized to receive AIMS or control training and underwent pre- and post-training encounters with blinded standardized patients. Encounters were assessed by blinded raters using a novel tool. Participant confidence and standardized patient evaluations of the participants' general communication skills were assessed.Ratings were available for 27 AIMS and 26 control participants. Statistically significant increases in post-training scores (maximum = 30) were detected in AIMS, but not in control, participants (median, 21.3 [IQR, 19.8-24.8] vs 18.8 [IQR, 16.9-20.9]; P .001). Elements (maximum score = 6) with significant increases were Inquire (0.67 [IQR, 0-1.76] vs -0.33 [IQR, -0.67 to 0.33]; P .001); Mirror (1.33 [IQR, 0 to 2] vs -0.33 [IQR, -0.92 to 0]; P .001) and Secure (0.33 [IQR, 0 to 1.67] vs -0.17 [IQR, -0.67 to 0.33]; P = .017). Self-confidence increased equally in both groups. Standardized patients did not detect a difference in communication skills after training and between groups. Internal consistency and inter-rater reliability of the assessment tool were modest.Standardized patients proved useful in studying the effectiveness of structured communication training, but may have been limited in their ability to perceive a difference between groups owing to the predetermined encounter outcome of vaccine refusal. AIMS training should be studied in real-world scenarios to determine if it impacts vaccine acceptance.

Publicly available surveillance data, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports, and other sources suggest that college students in the United States are at increased risk for meningococcus serogroup B (MenB) disease. US surveillance data from 2015 to 2017 show that the incidence of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) was greater among college students than among those not attending college; the average annual incidence of MenB disease was >5-fold higher among college students, and all college IMD outbreaks between 2011 and March 2019 were caused by MenB.

Background In the Southern Hemisphere 2010 influenza season, Seqirus’ split-virion, trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine was associated with increased reports of fevers and febrile reactions in young children. A staged clinical development program of a quadrivalent vaccine (Seqirus IIV4 [S-IIV4]; Afluria® Quadrivalent/Afluria Quad™/Afluria Tetra™), wherein each vaccine strain is split using a higher detergent concentration to reduce lipid content (considered the cause of the increased fevers and febrile reactions), is now complete. Methods Children aged 6–59 months were randomized 3:1 and stratified by age (6–35 months/36–59 months) to receive S-IIV4 (n = 1684) or a United States (US)-licensed comparator IIV4 (C-IIV4; Fluzone® Quadrivalent; n = 563) during the Northern Hemisphere 2016–2017 influenza season. The primary objective was to demonstrate noninferior immunogenicity of S-IIV4 versus C-IIV4. Immunogenicity was assessed by hemagglutination inhibition (baseline, 28 days postvaccination). Solicited, unsolicited, and serious adverse events were assessed for 7, 28, and 180 days postvaccination, respectively. Results S-IIV4 met the immunogenicity criteria for noninferiority. Adjusted geometric mean titer ratios (C-IIV4/S-IIV4) for the A/H1N1, A/H3N2, B/Yamagata, and B/Victoria strains were 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.88), 1.27 (1.15, 1.42), 1.12 (1.01, 1.24), and 0.97 (0.86, 1.09), respectively. Corresponding values for differences in seroconversion rates (C-IIV4 minus S-IIV4) were −10.3 (−15.4, −5.1), 2.6 (−2.5, 7.8), 3.1 (−2.1, 8.2), and 0.9 (−4.2, 6.1). Solicited, unsolicited, and serious adverse events were similar between vaccines in both age cohorts, apart from fever. Fever rates were lower with S-IIV4 (5.8%) than C-IIV4 (8.4%), with no febrile convulsions reported with either vaccine during the 7 days postvaccination. Conclusion S-IIV4, manufactured with a higher detergent concentration, demonstrated noninferior immunogenicity to the US-licensed C-IIV4, with similar postvaccination safety and tolerability, in children aged 6–59 months. This completes the program demonstrating the immunogenicity and safety of S-IIV4 in participants aged 6 months and older. Funding Seqirus Pty Ltd; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02914275 .

In the United States, individuals with HIV infection have been recommended to receive a 2-dose series of the meningococcal A, C, W, Y (MenACWY) vaccine since 2016 owing to their increased risk of meningococcal disease.To examine uptake and time to receipt of the MenACWY vaccine among people with a new diagnosis of HIV.This cohort study used health insurance data from the US Optum Research Database from January 1, 2016, through March 31, 2018, to retrospectively identify 1208 individuals aged 2 years or older with 1 or more inpatient claim or 2 or more outpatient claims evidencing a new diagnosis of HIV infection and with continuous insurance enrollment for 12 or more months before and 6 or more months after diagnosis. Follow-up was 6 to 33 months. Statistical analysis was conducted from March 7, 2019, to January 5, 2022.Receipt of the MenACWY vaccine.The coprimary outcomes were uptake and time to receipt of 1 or more doses of the MenACWY vaccine after a new HIV diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included uptake and time to receipt of 2 or more doses of the MenACWY vaccine. Vaccination uptake and receipt were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis; factors associated with receipt of 1 or more doses of the MenACWY vaccine were identified with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.Of 1208 individuals eligible for vaccination (1024 male patients [84.8%]; mean [SD] age, 38.8 [12.5] years; 35 [2.9%] Asian; 273 [22.6%] Black; 204 [16.9%] Hispanic; 442 [36.6%] White), 16.3% were estimated to have received a first dose of the MenACWY vaccine in the 2 years after a new HIV diagnosis. Among individuals who received a first dose, at 1 year or more of enrollment after the first dose, 66.2% were estimated to have received a second dose within 1 year of the first dose. Factors statistically significantly associated with uptake of the MenACWY vaccine included receipt of a pneumococcal vaccine (hazard ratio [HR], 23.03; 95% CI, 13.93-38.09), attendance at a well-care visit (HR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.11-12.12), West or Midwest geographic region (West: HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.44-3.47; Midwest: HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.16-2.71), and male sex (HR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.18-6.26), whereas age of 56 years or older was significantly associated with reduced uptake of the MenACWY vaccine (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.97).This cohort study suggests that MenACWY vaccine uptake among people with a new diagnosis of HIV was low, highlighting the need to educate patients and clinicians about the recommendations for conditions such as HIV infection that increase the risk of meningococcal disease among high-risk populations.

Background Patients with asplenia are recommended to receive meningococcal ACWY (MenACWY) and B (MenB) vaccines in the United States (US). Objectives To examine uptake and time to receipt of meningococcal vaccines in newly diagnosed asplenia patients, and identify factors associated with vaccination. Methods For this retrospective database analysis, patients were identified from 1/1/2010 (MenACWY) or 1/1/2015 (MenB) through 3/31/2018 from an administrative claims database including commercially insured US patients with ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient claims with evidence of a new asplenia diagnosis (sickle cell disease was excluded); continuous enrollment for ≥12 months before and ≥6 months after the index date; and age ≥2 (MenACWY) or ≥10 (MenB) years. Co-primary outcomes were uptake and time to receipt of ≥1 dose, separately for MenACWY and MenB, by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify characteristics associated with vaccination. Results Among 2,273 and 741 patients eligible for the MenACWY and MenB analyses, respectively, 28.1% and 9.7% received MenACWY and MenB in the first 3 years after a new asplenia diagnosis. Patients were more likely to receive meningococcal vaccines if they had received pneumococcal vaccines (MenACWY: hazard ratio [HR] 26.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 21.01–32.22; MenB: HR 3.89; 95% CI 2.07–7.29) or attended ≥1 well-care visit (MenACWY: HR 6.63; 95% CI 4.84–9.09; MenB: HR 11.17; 95% CI 3.02–41.26). Conclusions Meningococcal vaccination rates among newly diagnosed asplenia patients were low, highlighting the need to educate providers about the recommendations for high-risk conditions and ensure healthcare access for vulnerable patients.

Background In response to the detection of porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV-1) in the human rotavirus vaccine (HRV), a PCV-free HRV (no detection of PCV-1 and PCV-2 according to the detection limit of tests used) was developed. Liquid (Liq) PCV-free HRV previously showed immunogenicity and safety profiles comparable to lyophilized (Lyo) HRV. Methods This was a phase 3a, randomized, single-blind study (NCT03207750) conducted in the United States. Healthy infants aged 6–12 weeks received 2 doses (0, 2 months) of either Liq PCV-free HRV or Lyo HRV with routine vaccines (0, 2, 4 months): diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis, hepatitis B and inactivated poliovirus combination vaccine (DTaP-HBV-IPV), monovalent tetanus toxoid-conjugated vaccine against Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib-TT), and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Co-primary objectives were: (i) to assess non-inferiority of immune responses to routine vaccine antigens 1 month post-dose 3 following co-administration with Liq PCV-free HRV compared to Lyo HRV; (ii) to rule out a 10% decrease in seroresponse to pertussis antigens after dose 3. Other objectives were to evaluate immunogenicity and safety of HRV vaccines. Results Of 1272 vaccinated infants, 990 (489 in Liq PCV-free HRV and 501 in Lyo HRV group) were included in the per-protocol set. All statistical criteria were met, thus co-primary objectives were demonstrated. Seroprotection/seropositivity rates in both groups were high: 100% for diphtheria/tetanus, ≥99.3% for HBV, ≥99.8% for polio, ≥99.8% for each pertussis antigen, ≥90.8% for all pneumococcal serotypes except serotype 3 (≥69.1%), and ≥ 97.4% for Hib. Most infants seroconverted for anti-RV antibodies (76.3% of Liq PCV-free HRV and 78.9% of Lyo HRV recipients). Geometric mean concentrations/titers were comparable between groups. Incidences of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar between groups. Conclusion Routine pediatric vaccines co-administered with Liq PCV-free HRV showed non-inferior immune responses and similar safety profiles to those following co-administration with Lyo HRV.

Background MMR II (M-M-R II [Merck & Co, Inc.]) is currently the only measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine licensed in the United States. A second MMR vaccine would mitigate the potential risk of vaccine supply shortage or delay. In this study, we assessed the immunogenicity and safety of another MMR vaccine (MMR-RIT [Priorix, GlaxoSmithKline]) compared with those of the MMR II in 12- to 15-month-old children who received it as a first dose. Methods In this phase III, observer-blinded, noninferiority, lot-to-lot consistency clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01702428), 5003 healthy children were randomly assigned to receive 1 dose of MMR-RIT (1 of 3 production lots) or MMR II along with other age-recommended routine vaccines. We evaluated the immunogenicity of all vaccines in terms of antibody concentrations (by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or electrochemiluminescence assay) and/or seroresponse rates 43 days after vaccination. We also assessed the reactogenicity and safety of the vaccines. Results Immunoresponses after vaccination with MMR-RIT were robust and noninferior to those after vaccination with the MMR II. Immunogenicity of the 3 production lots of MMR-RIT was consistent; more than 97% of the children had a seroresponse to MMR components. The coadministered vaccines elicited similar immunoresponses in the MMR-RIT and MMR II groups. Both MMR vaccines resulted in comparable reactogenicity profiles, and no safety concerns were detected. Conclusions If licensed, the MMR-RIT could provide a valid option for the prevention of measles, mumps, and rubella in children in the United States and would reduce potential risks of a vaccine shortage., When compared with the MMR II vaccine (M-M-R-II) currently available in the United States, a first dose of MMR-RIT (Priorix) given to 1-year-old children elicited robust immunoresponses and raised no safety concerns.

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the concept of the public interest. The central question is whether the public interest is a usable concept in a time of social and political change. A historical overview of the public interest is provided. Two researchers are highlighted: David John Farmer and O.C. McSwite. The paper concludes by proposing the refusal of subjective identification with the public interest. Design/methodology/approach Discourse theory and Lacanian psychoanalysis are discussed in this paper. The emphasis in both approaches is to examine ethical challenges in politics and administration through new epistemological lenses. A further use of these research strategies is to identify existing institutional practices and situate administrative decision-making within those practices. Findings The findings in this paper indicate that while institutional resistance is useful, it can also be co-opted or result in retribution. In both cases, power is asserted and maintained by those who hold institutional power. David John Farmer’s work on anti-administration and O.C. McSwite’s work on administrative refusal are effective strategies to address the abuse of institutional power. Originality/value This paper introduces the concept of subjective identification to the literature of public administration. Subjective identification offers administrators a new approach to the ethical dilemmas they face in the workplace.

Background Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome is the most common periodic fever syndrome in children. There is considerable heterogeneity in management strategies and a lack of evidence-based treatment guidelines. Consensus treatment plans (CTPs) are standardized treatment regimens that are derived based upon best available evidence and current treatment practices that are a way to enable comparative effectiveness studies to identify optimal therapy and are less costly to execute than randomized, double blind placebo controlled trials. The purpose of this project was to develop CTPs and response criteria for PFAPA. Methods The CARRA PFAPA Working Group is composed of pediatric rheumatologists, infectious disease specialists, allergists/immunologists and otolaryngologists. An extensive literature review was conducted followed by a survey to assess physician practice patterns. This was followed by virtual and in-person meetings between 2014 and 2018. Nominal group technique (NGT) was employed to develop CTPs, as well as inclusion criteria for entry into future treatment studies, and response criteria. Consensus required 80% agreement. Results The PFAPA working group developed CTPs resulting in 4 different treatment arms: 1. Antipyretic, 2. Abortive (corticosteroids), 3. Prophylaxis (colchicine or cimetidine) and 4. Surgical (tonsillectomy). Consensus was obtained among CARRA members for those defining patient characteristics who qualify for participation in the CTP PFAPA study. Conclusion The goal is for the CTPs developed by our group to lead to future comparative effectiveness studies that will generate evidence-driven therapeutic guidelines for this periodic inflammatory disease.

This article critically examines the ways in which organizational performance and audit practices intersect with the dynamics of contemporary capitalism, managerialism, and individualism to shape t...

We describe the first 2 cases from the United States, of human parechovirus infection in infants manifesting a distinct rash of the hands and feet. We propose the term "Mittens and Booties Syndrome" and provide a review of the literature of all published cases.

Background Combination vaccines reduce the number of injections and improve the timeliness of vaccination coverage. US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations state that combination vaccines are generally preferred over equivalent individual component vaccines. Healthcare providers strongly influence parental decisions about vaccination. We sought a contemporary understanding of physician’s attitudes towards combination vaccine use in infants. Methods We conducted an online survey of US physicians (70 pediatricians and 30 family practitioners) who administer vaccines to infants aged 0-24 months and spend at least 2 days a week providing patient care. Information was collected on attitudes towards combination vaccines and factors that influence the choice of combination vaccine used in clinical practice. Descriptive analyses were performed. Results Physicians (mean age=50.2 years, range 30.0-70.0; 66% white; 37% women) reported a median of 4 injections (range 2-9) as the maximum that parents would accept at a single visit, and 71% routinely explained what combination vaccines are to parents. When deciding which pentavalent vaccine to use, physicians considered how the brand fits into the current vaccine schedule (71%); upfront purchase costs (64%); and availability as a prefilled syringe (61%). The main reasons for using combination vaccines were to reduce the number of injections (96%); ensure the infant is up-to-date with vaccinations (86%); and reduce the pain that the infant experiences with multiple injections (68%). More than half reported that their institution or practice has a program to incentivize infant vaccination according to schedule. If a hexavalent vaccine-based schedule was available, 76% of physicians said they would choose it over their current schedule comprising pentavalent or equivalent component vaccines. Conclusion Choice of pentavalent combination vaccine among pediatricians and family practitioners was largely dependent on convenience and cost-related factors. Over three-quarters would be inclined to use a hexavalent vaccine schedule if available. Disclosures Ya-Ting Chen, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Xinyi Ng, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Consultant) Tanaz Petigara, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Jyoti Aggarwal, MHS, Merck & Co., Inc. (Consultant) Jenna Bhaloo, MPH, Merck & Co., Inc. (Consultant) Michelle Goveia, MD, Merck & Co., Inc (Employee, Shareholder) David Johnson, MD, MPH, Sanofi Pasteur (Employee, Shareholder) Gary S. Marshall, MD, GlaxoSmithKline (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Pfizer (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Sanofi Pasteur (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Honorarium for conference lecture)Seqirus (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)

Background Vaccine hesitancy (VH) is one of the top 10 threats to global public health. While VH is common among parents, there are no accepted best practices for counseling, and training in this area is not required in residency. Strategies are needed to help providers address VH in practice. Methods The AIMS (Announce, Inquire, Mirror, Secure) Method for Healthy Conversations is a structured communication strategy that attempts to build trust between provider and patient (or parent), inviting receptivity to healthcare recommendations. To assess whether relatively inexperienced providers exhibit AIMS behaviors after training, blinded pediatric residents were pseudo-randomized to receive either AIMS or control training. Subjects underwent pre- and post-training clinical encounters with blinded standardized patients (SPs) portraying vaccine-hesitant parents; encounters were video-recorded and assessed by 3 blinded raters using the Vaccine Hesitancy Communication Assessment (VHCA) tool, which was developed by an iterative process and validated in pilot testing. Subject confidence was assessed pre- and post-training. Results Overall VHCA intraclass correlation was 0.273 for pre and 0.681 for post encounters (2-way mixed averages); reliability varied with AIMS phases. Fifty-eight subjects completed the protocol, and VHCA ratings for 29 subjects were available for this analysis. AIMS behaviors were more commonly detected among AIMS-trained subjects than control (median change in score [scale 0–30]=4.5 versus 0 for control) (Figure 1). Confidence improved in both groups (Figure 2). SPs perceived no differences between groups, nor between pre and post within groups, in aspects of subject performance such as respect, empathy, and promotion of trust (P=0.936 [ANCOVA]; partial eta-squared 0.0). Figure 1 Figure 2 Conclusion Pediatric residents can be trained in AIMS behaviors, and an SP model of VH can be used to assess performance. AIMS training results in similar gains in self-confidence compared to control training. SP perceptions may be colored by their script, which in this case was to exhibit adamant vaccine refusal. Testing of AIMS training in longitudinal experimental scenarios and in real-world settings is warranted. Disclosures Kristina A. Bryant, MD, Pfizer (Research Grant or Support, Investigator on multi-center clinical trials) Gary S. Marshall, MD, GlaxoSmithKline (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Pfizer (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Sanofi Pasteur (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Honorarium for conference lecture)Seqirus (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)

A telephone interview was conducted with parents of 120 children seen in a pediatric infectious diseases clinic for unexplained fever who received no definitive diagnosis or were thought to have recurrent self-limited illnesses. Only 3 were diagnosed with a fever-related condition after 8 years of follow-up. The majority remained well.

Background The US vaccination schedule includes DTaP, IPV, Hib and HepB doses in the first 6 months of life. A previous analysis found variability in the timing of HepB doses in infants receiving DTaP-IPV/Hib. We explored factors associated with co-administration of DTaP-IPV/Hib and HepB on the same day. Methods This was a retrospective study using the MarketScan® commercial claims and encounters database. Infants born from 1 July 2010 - 30 June 2016, continuously enrolled in an insurance plan for ≥ 13 months and receiving ≥ 3 DTaP-IPV/Hib doses were included. Infants were assessed for HepB claims relative to the first and third DTaP-IPV/Hib doses. Because a HepB birth dose was assumed, the first HepB claim from 29 - 169 days following birth was counted as Dose 2, and the second claim from 170 days - 12 months as Dose 3. Associations between demographic, provider, and insurance characteristics, receipt of other pediatric vaccines, and co-administration of DTaP-IPV/Hib and HepB were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Results Among 165,553 infants who received a first DTaP-IPV/Hib dose, 60.7% received HepB Dose 2 on the same day. Among 162,217 infants who received a third DTaP-IPV/Hib dose, 45.1% received HepB Dose 3 on the same day. Infants in the Northeast were less likely (OR=0.38, 95%CI=0.36-0.39), while those in the West were more likely (OR=1.41, 95%CI=1.36-1.46) than infants in the South to receive the first dose of DTaP-IPV/Hib and HepB Dose 2 on the same day. Infants vaccinated by pediatricians (OR=0.54, 95%CI=0.53-0.55) were less likely to receive the first dose of DTaP-IPV/Hib and HepB Dose 2 on the same day compared to infants vaccinated by family physicians. Infants who received PCV on the same day as the first dose of DTaP-IPV/Hib were more likely to receive HepB Dose 2 (OR=6.96, 95%CI=6.30-7.70) that day. These factors were also associated with co-administration of the third dose of DTaP-IPV/Hib and HepB Dose 3. Conclusion Differences in co-administration of DTaP-IPV/Hib and HepB were associated with region of residence, provider type and co-administration of PCV. The reasons underlying these differences merit exploration. A hexavalent vaccine containing DTaP, IPV, Hib, and HepB could improve timeliness of HepB vaccination, while reducing the number of injections during infancy. Disclosures Tanaz Petigara, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Ya-Ting Chen, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Zhiwen Liu, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc., (Employee) Michelle Goveia, MD, Merck & Co., Inc (Employee, Shareholder) David Johnson, MD, MPH, Sanofi Pasteur (Employee, Shareholder) Gary S. Marshall, MD, GlaxoSmithKline (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Pfizer (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Sanofi Pasteur (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Honorarium for conference lecture)Seqirus (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)

This article introduces the debate about the role of the university in the knowledge economy to the literature on doctoral education in public administration. An important part of this narrative is the rise of academic capitalism and the increasing tension between symbolic and commodified knowledge. A second part of this narrative is intellectual work as public work. Central to this idea of academic public work is the co-producing of knowledge and the valuing of local knowledge alongside expert knowledge, thus creating the conditions for universities in the 21st century to become enclaves of democratic engagement. Democratic engagement underscores the importance of epistemological pluralism and inclusiveness. Faculty and doctoral students in public administration can benefit from an appreciation of this new context.

Practice variation exists in the management of children with bacterial pneumonia complicated by empyema. The success of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) versus chest tube insertion for drainage and fibrinolysis may be dependent on the stage of disease. There is little published experience with early transition to oral (PO) antibiotics, and many children are treated with intravenous (IV) antibiotics at home. To describe a cohort of children with pneumonia and empyema in a primarily rural state managed with early VATS and transition to PO antibiotics. This was a retrospective medical record review of children managed by the pediatric infectious diseases and surgery services at Kosair Children's Hospital from 2008 through 2012. Sixty-one children met inclusion criteria. The majority underwent VATS on the first or second hospital day. No organism was identified in 67 per cent of cases. All patients received IVantibiotics at admission and all were discharged on PO antibiotics. The median time to transition was five days (interquartile range [IQR], 4–6), and the median duration of PO therapy was 16 days (IQR, 14–21). Ninety-eight per cent did not require further IV therapy. There were no deaths and clinical outcomes were good. In conclusion, children with pneumonia and empyema can be managed effectively with early VATS and early transition from IV to PO antibiotic therapy.

Governance is central to our current understanding of public administration and policy. Mark Bevirʼs work provides governance studies solid epistemological grounding through a social constructionist approach which gives rise to a decentered theory of governance. This article explains decentered theory by examining the entrepreneurial subject as an artifact of neo-liberal governance. In doing so, it explores the key concepts that give shape to decentered theory.

Background Routine immunizations for children aged 10 years and younger in the United States (US) currently cover 14 diseases. Updated estimates of public health impact are needed, given changes in disease epidemiology, evolving recommendations, and the dynamic nature of compliance with the immunization schedule. Methods Pre-vaccine disease incidence was estimated before each routine vaccine was recommended, with average values across multiple years obtained directly from published literature or calculated based on disease surveillance data or annual case estimates from the published literature. Pre-vaccine incidence then was compared to current, post-vaccine incidence, which was generally calculated as average values over the most recent 5 years of available incidence data. Overall incidence estimates and estimates by age group were calculated. Differences in pre- and post-vaccine disease incidence rates were used to calculate the annual number of cases averted, based on 2019 US population estimates. This analysis did not separately estimate the proportion of disease incidence reduction that may be attributed to adult vaccines or booster doses. Results Post-vaccine disease incidence decreased overall and for all age groups across all diseases evaluated (Table 1). Decreases ranged from 17.4% for influenza to 100.0% for polio (Figure 1). Over 90% reduction in incidence was achieved for 10 of the 14 diseases evaluated (including reduction in incidence of rotavirus hospitalizations). Overall post-vaccine disease incidence estimates were highest for influenza, rotavirus, and varicella. Estimated annual cases averted by vaccination in 2019 ranged from 1,269 for tetanus to more than 4.2 million for varicella. Table 1. Pre- and Post-Vaccine Disease Incidence Estimates, Annual Cases, and 2019 Cases Averted, by Disease Figure 1. Percentage Reduction in Disease Incidence Post-Vaccine, by Disease Conclusion Routine childhood immunization in the US continues to result in high, sustained reduction in disease across all vaccines and for all age groups evaluated. Disclosures Elizabeth M. La, PhD, RTI Health Solutions (Employee) Justin Carrico, BS, GlaxoSmithKline (Consultant) Sandra E. Talbird, MSPH, RTI Health Solutions (Employee) Ya-Ting Chen, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Mawuli K. Nyaku, DrPh, Merck & Co. Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Cristina Carias, PhD, Merck (Employee, Shareholder) Gary S. Marshall, MD, GlaxoSmithKline (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Pfizer (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Sanofi Pasteur (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Honorarium for conference lecture)Seqirus (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator) Craig S. Roberts, PharmD, MPA, MBA, Merck & Co., Inc (Employee, Shareholder)

Background Vaccination is recommended for persons at increased risk for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) due to complement component deficiency (CD), asplenia or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. However, uptake of quadrivalent conjugate and polysaccharide meningococcal vaccines (MenACWY) one year following a new high-risk diagnosis is very low (doi:10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2403). This retrospective cohort study identified factors associated with MenACWY vaccination among patients newly diagnosed with CD or HIV. Methods Patients identified from a large US commercial administrative claims database (Optum Research Database) with continuous enrollment for ≥12 months before and ≥6 months after appearance of an incident high-risk diagnosis through the end of the study period (3/31/2018) were considered eligible (Figure). Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify characteristics associated with time to receipt of ≥1 dose of MenACWY during time periods corresponding with Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations. Results The CD cohort consisted of 1,470 (mean=40.9 years of age) patients and the HIV cohort of 1,208 (38.8 years). Only 7.9% and 20.8% of patients with CD or HIV, respectively, received ≥1 dose of MenACWY between their index date and the end of the study period. A strong association between receipt of MenACWY and pneumococcal vaccines was seen for CD [hazard ratio (HR): 3.2; 95% CI: 1.8–5.7] and HIV [23.0; 13.9–38.1]. Age (11–18 years; for CD only) and having a well-care visit after the index date (for CD and HIV) was associated with higher likelihood of vaccination. Vaccination rates for HIV were lowest in the South. Conclusion The association of MenACWY vaccination with age in patients with CD suggests confusion between routine age-based and high-risk recommendations, whereas in patients with CD or HIV, the association with pneumococcal vaccines suggests that providers recognize the overlap in risk factors for IMD and pneumococcal disease. Ensuring healthcare access for these vulnerable patients and educating providers about high-risk recommendations is crucial. Funding GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA (study identifier: HO-18-19581) Disclosures Parinaz Ghaswalla, PhD, ORCID: 0000-0002-2883-5590, GlaxoSmithKline (Employee, Shareholder) Lindsay Bengtson, PhD, MPH, Optum (Employee, I am an employee of Optum. Optum was paid by GSK for this work. My employment at Optum is not contingent upon this work.) Gary S. Marshall, MD, GlaxoSmithKline (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Pfizer (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Sanofi Pasteur (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Honorarium for conference lecture)Seqirus (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator) Ami R. Buikema, MPH, Optum (Employee, I am an employee of Optum. Optum was paid by GSK for this work. My employment at Optum is not contingent upon this work.) Tim Bancroft, PhD, Optum (Employee, I am an employee of Optum. Optum was paid by GSK for this work. My employment at Optum is not contingent upon this work.) Krista Schladweiler, PhD, Optum (Employee, I am an employee of Optum. Optum was paid by GSK for this work. My employment at Optum is not contingent upon this work.) Eleena Koep, MS, Optum (Employee) Patricia Novy, PhD, GSK (Employee, Shareholder) Cosmina Hogea, PhD, GlaxoSmithKline (Employee, Shareholder)

Background Ten different vaccine series are recommended by the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices from birth to 18 months. Combination vaccines can reduce the number of injections and visits required to complete the schedule in a timely manner. There is limited current information on parents’ perception of the vaccine schedule and combination vaccines. Methods An online survey was completed by 100 parents who had at least one child under 2 years, were involved in vaccination decisions, and had accompanied their child to a vaccination appointment. Parents who reported not ever vaccinating their children were excluded. Parents’ perception of, and adherence to, the recommended schedule, communication with providers, and knowledge of combination vaccines were collected. Descriptive analyses were performed. Results Ninety-six percent of parents (mean age=30.7 years; range 19.0-50.0; 91% white) reported their provider as a source of vaccination information, followed by internet searches (63%), family and friends (45%). Most (84%) followed all their provider’s recommendations and trusted the information given to them (87%). State day care and pre-school requirements influenced vaccination decisions for nearly 80% of parents. Over 80% of parents thought it is important to protect against diseases covered by the vaccination schedule. One-third had at some time asked to delay or not administer vaccines; depending on the vaccine, up to 50% ultimately had their child vaccinated as recommended. Top reasons for delaying vaccination were to avoid crying and pain from multiple injections (82%), and the concern that too many vaccines would overwhelm the immune system (64%). Top reasons for refusal were religious views (57%) and the belief that the vaccine was not needed (52%). On average, parents would accept their child receiving 3 injections in one visit. Most parents were aware of combination vaccines (84%); however, one-third reported that their child had not received, or they were unaware of their child receiving, a combination vaccine. Conclusion Providers are in a strong position to influence vaccination decisions by parents. Whereas parents are motivated to avoid the pain of multiple injections, many are unaware that their children are receiving combination vaccines. Disclosures Tanaz Petigara, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Xinyi Ng, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Consultant) Ya-Ting Chen, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Jyoti Aggarwal, MHS, Merck & Co., Inc. (Consultant) Jenna Bhaloo, MPH, Merck & Co., Inc. (Consultant) Michelle Goveia, MD, Merck & Co., Inc (Employee, Shareholder) David Johnson, MD, MPH, Sanofi Pasteur (Employee, Shareholder) Gary S. Marshall, MD, GlaxoSmithKline (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Pfizer (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Sanofi Pasteur (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Honorarium for conference lecture)Seqirus (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)