1. Actions to Improve the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures in Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Social Return on Investment (SROI) Study
- Author
-
Olmo-Montes FJ, Caeiro-Rey JR, Peris P, Pérez del Río V, Etxebarria-Foronda Í, Cancio-Trujillo JM, Pareja T, Jódar E, Naranjo A, Moro-Álvarez MJ, García-Goñi M, Vergés J, Maratia S, Campos Tapias I, Prades M, and Aceituno S
- Subjects
economic evaluation ,healthcare investment ,prevention measures ,healthcare outcomes ,fracture liaison services ,health-related quality of life ,Medicine (General) ,R5-920 ,Therapeutics. Pharmacology ,RM1-950 - Abstract
Francisco Jesús Olmo-Montes,1 José Ramón Caeiro-Rey,2 Pilar Peris,3 Verónica Pérez del Río,4,5 Íñigo Etxebarria-Foronda,6 José Manuel Cancio-Trujillo,7 Teresa Pareja,8 Esteban Jódar,9 Antonio Naranjo,10 María Jesús Moro-Álvarez,11 Manuel García-Goñi,12 Josep Vergés,13 Stefano Maratia,14 Ignasi Campos Tapias,15 Miriam Prades,16 Susana Aceituno16 1Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Macarena, Sevilla, Spain; 2Traumatology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; 3Rheumatology Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; 4Traumatology Department, Hospital San Juan de la Cruz, Úbeda, Spain; 5Medicine and Dermatology Department, Faculty of Medicine of Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain; 6Traumatology Department, Hospital Alto Deba, Gipuzkoa, Spain; 7Geriatrics Department, Badalona Serveis Assistencials, Badalona, Spain; 8Geriatrics Department, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain; 9Endocrinology Department, Hospital Universitario Quirón de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; 10Rheumatology Department, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain; 11Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Central Universitario Cruz Roja “San Jose y Santa Adela”, Madrid, Spain; 12Department of Applied & Structural Economics and History, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; 13Asociación Española con la Osteoporosis y la Artrosis (AECOSAR), Madrid, Spain; 14UCB Pharma S.A., Madrid, Spain; 15Amgen S.A., Barcelona, Spain; 16Outcomes’ 10, S.L.U., Castellón de la Plana, SpainCorrespondence: Antonio Naranjo, Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Barranco de la Ballena s/n, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35011, Spain, Tel +34 928450600, Email anarher@gobiernodecanarias.orgPurpose: This study evaluates the Social Return on Investment (SROI) of implementing measures to prevent fragility fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (OP) in Spain.Methods: A group of 13 stakeholders identified necessary actions for improving refracture prevention and assessed the investment required from the Spanish National Health System (SNHS), considering direct, indirect, and intangible costs over a one-year period. Unitary costs were sourced from scientific literature and official data, and intangible costs were estimated through surveys on women’s willingness to pay for better health-related quality of life. The SROI ratio was calculated from both a social perspective (including all returns) and the SNHS perspective (including only direct and intangible costs). A sensitivity analysis evaluated the returns in worst- and best-case scenarios over three years.Results: Stakeholders agreed on four main actions: 1) establishing fracture liaison services; 2) harmonizing clinical practice guidelines and provide training for healthcare professionals (HCPs); 3) promoting HCPs’ adherence to fracture registries and 4) raising awareness of OP and fragility fractures. From the social perspective, implementing these actions would cost the SNHS € 4,375,663 but yield a social return of € 96,939,931 in the first year, resulting in a SROI ratio of € 22.15 per euro invested (€ 28.69, 23.14, 24.29, and 10.70 for the four actions, respectively). From the SNHS perspective, the return would be € 36,453,509 (€ 21,523,444 tangible), with a SROI of € 8.33 (€ 4.92 tangible) and for the four actions: € 9.99, 9.39, 8.45, and 3.79, respectively (€ 5.89, 5.54, 4.96 and 2.27 tangible). The investment would be lower than the return for all actions (3.49%, 4.32%, 4.12% and 9.34% of social perspective return, respectively) and scenarios.Conclusion: According to our SROI method, implementing different actions to improve secondary fracture prevention would achieve a considerable social benefit, which, in terms of direct, indirect, and intangible costs, would far outweigh the investment.Keywords: economic evaluation, healthcare investment, prevention measures, healthcare outcomes, fracture liaison services, health-related quality of life
- Published
- 2024