Search

Background and Goal: Vaccination against influenza is widespread worldwide, reducing complications associated with infection. However, the impact of vaccination on mortality/ICU admission in hospitalized patients has been little studied., Material and Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 238 patients hospitalized for influenza from October 2023 to January 2024 to evaluate the vaccine's effectiveness in terms of the combined event of ICU admission/mortality during hospitalization. Additionally, the characteristics of vaccinated patients and the existence of bacterial superinfection were analyzed. Cox regression was performed using the SPSS program and the free «R» software., Results: A total of 238 patients were included. Those vaccinated were older (78.2±8.8 vs 69.97±16.6years; P<.001) and were more likely to have hypertension (82.2% vs 56.2%; P<.001), cardiovascular disease (36.6% vs 24.1%; P=.05), chronic bronchopathy (25.7% vs 8.8%; P=.001), or chronic kidney disease (22.8% vs 8.8%; P=0.005). They had lower levels of CRP (8.39±9.55 vs 11.03±10.75mg/dl; P=.05), procalcitonin (0.62±1.74 vs 1.67±4.57ng/dl; P=.05), and SOFA scores (1.13±0.9 vs 1.39±0.97; P=0.033). 11 patients were admitted to ICU (4.6%) and 11 died (4.6%). Influenza vaccination was associated as a protective factor against ICU admission/mortality in the Cox regression (HR=0.216; 95%CI: 0.062-0.759, P=.017). The presence of bacterial superinfection was similar between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients (63.4% vs 67.9%; P=.556)., Conclusions: Influenza vaccination may reduce the probability of ICU admission or death. This effect is likely due to better control of the immune response. We did not observe any relationship with the risk of presenting bacterial superinfection., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

This case report investigates elevated serum concentrations of inhaled tobramycin in a patient with chronic kidney disease. The patient, a man in his early 80s with complex comorbidities, underwent tobramycin inhalation therapy for chronic respiratory infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa Despite the strategic localised treatment approach, unexpectedly high plasma tobramycin concentrations were observed. After a dosage adjustment guided by a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model, a final inhalation dose of 300 mg of tobramycin was determined at a 24-hour interval. This case report underscores the need for rigorous monitoring of plasma tobramycin levels in patients with renal impairment undergoing inhaled tobramycin therapy, advocating for enhanced pharmacokinetic models to improve the safety and efficacy of the treatment., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© European Association of Hospital Pharmacists 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Remdesivir seems to reduce the risk of hospitalization and improve clinical outcome in hospitalized patients with COVID-19., Objectives: To compare the clinical outcome of COVID-19 hospitalized patients treated with remdesivir plus dexamethasone versus dexamethasone alone, according to their vaccination status., Material and Methods: A retrospective observational study was carried out in 165 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 from October 2021 to January 2022. Multivariate logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier and the log-rank tests were used to evaluate the event (need for ventilation or death)., Results: Patients treated with remdesivir plus dexamethasone (n=87) compared with dexamethasone alone (n=78) showed similar age (60±16, 47-70 vs. 62±37, 51-74 years) and number of comorbidities: 1 (0-2) versus 1.5 (1-3). Among 73 fully vaccinated patients, 42 (47.1%) were in remdesivir plus dexamethasone and 31 (41%) in dexamethasone alone. Patients treated with remdesivir plus dexamethasone needed intensive care less frequently (17.2% vs. 31%; p=0.002), high-flow oxygen (25.3% vs. 50.0%; p=0.002) and non-invasive mechanical ventilation (16.1% vs. 47.4%; p<0.001). Furthermore, they had less complications during hospitalization (31.0% vs. 52.6%; p=0.008), need of antibiotics (32.2% vs. 59%; p=0.001) and radiologic worsening (21.8% vs. 44.9%; p=0.005). Treatment with remdesivir plus dexamethasone (aHR, 0.26; 95% CI: 0.14-0.48; p<0.001) and vaccination (aHR 0.39; 95% CI: 0.21-0.74) were independent factors associated with lower progression to mechanical ventilation or death., Conclusions: Remdesivir in combination with dexamethasone and vaccination independently and synergistically protects hospitalized COVID-19 patients requiring oxygen therapy from progression to severe disease or dead., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although vaccination has considerably reduced the risk of hospitalization and death from COVID19, the impact of vaccination and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody status on the outcome of patients who required hospitalization has been poorly investigated., Material and Methods: A prospective observational study in 232 patients hospitalized for COVID19 was carried out from October 2021 to January 2022 to evaluate the role on patient outcome of their vaccination and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody status and titer, comorbidities, analytical determinations, clinical presentation at admission, treatments and requirements for respiratory support. Cox regression and survival analyzes were performed. The SPSS and "R" programs were used., Results: Patients with complete vaccination schedule had higher S-protein antibody titers (log10 3.73 [2.83-4.6] UI/ml vs 1.6 [2.99-2.61] UI/ml; p  < 0.001), lower probability of radiographic worsening (21.6% vs. 35.4%; p  = 0.005), less likely required high doses of dexamethasone (28.4% vs. 45.4%; p  = 0.012), high-flow oxygen (20.6% vs. 35.4%; p  = 0.02), ventilation (13.7% vs, 33.8%; p  = 0.001) and intensive care admissions (10.8% vs. 32.6%; p  < 0.001). Remdesivir (HR = 0.38; p  < 0.001) and complete vaccination schedule (HR = 0.34; p  = 0.008) were protective factors. No differences in antibody status were detected between groups (HR = 0.58; p  = 0.219)., Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was associated with higher S-protein antibody titers and lower probability of radiological progression, immunomodulators requirement and respiratory support or death. However, vaccination but not antibody titters protected from adverse events pointing a role of immune-protective mechanisms in addition to humoral response., (© 2023 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although vaccination has considerably reduced the risk of hospitalization and death from COVID19, the impact of vaccination and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody status on the outcome of patients who required hospitalization has been poorly investigated., Material and Methods: A prospective observational study in 232 patients hospitalized for COVID19 was carried out from October 2021 to January 2022 to evaluate the role on patient outcome of their vaccination and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody status and titer, comorbidities, analytical determinations, clinical presentation at admission, treatments and requirements for respiratory support. Cox regression and survival analyzes were performed. The SPSS and "R" programs were used., Results: Patients with complete vaccination schedule had higher S-protein antibody titers (log10 3.73 [2.83-4.6]UI/ml vs 1.6 [2.99-2.61]UI/ml; p<0.001), lower probability of radiographic worsening (21.6% vs. 35.4%; p=0.005), less likely required high doses of dexamethasone (28.4% vs. 45.4%; p=0.012), high-flow oxygen (20.6% vs. 35.4%; p=0.02), ventilation (13.7% vs, 33.8%; p=0.001) and intensive care admissions (10.8% vs. 32.6%; p<0.001). Remdesivir (HR=0.38; p<0.001) and complete vaccination schedule (HR=0.34; p=0.008) were protective factors. No differences in antibody status were detected between groups (HR=0.58; p=0.219)., Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was associated with higher S-protein antibody titers and lower probability of radiological progression, immunomodulators requirement and respiratory support or death. However, vaccination but not antibody titters protected from adverse events pointing a role of immune-protective mechanisms in addition to humoral response., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To assess the prognostic value of procalcitonin (PTC), C-reactive protein (CRP), N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) in patients with influenza syndrome., Material and Methods: Prospective study in patients admitted from the emergency department with influenza syndrome. Biomarker concentrations were measured in the first 24 h after admission and a test for influenza. The results were analyzed for ability to predict a hospital stay longer than 7 days, intensive care unit admission, or in-hospital death., Results: Ninety-eight patients were included; the prognosis of 44 (44.9%) was classified as poor. The areas under the receiving operator characteristic curve were 0.68 (95% CI, 0.56-0.80) for NT-proBNP, 0.73 (95% CI, 0.62-0.84) for MR-proADM, and nonsignificant for PCT and CRP. The following variables were independently associated with a poor prognosis: pneumonia (OR, 7.46 [95% CI, 2.08-26.73]; P=.002), heart failure (OR, 5.16 [95% CI, 1.35-19.74]; P=.016), and NT-proBNP > 580 pg/mL (OR, 4.68 [95% CI, 1.53-14.26]; P=.006). In the 53 patients with confirmed A(H1N1) influenza, only NT-proBNP was an independent predictor of prognosis (adjusted OR, 5.75 [95% CI, 1.46- 22.61]; P=.012)., Conclusion: NT-proBNP and MR-proADM were the only biomarkers with prognostic value. Only NT-proBNP was a useful predictor in patients with confirmed influenza.

Background: Midregional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) is a prognostic biomarker in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and sepsis. In this paper, we examined the ability of MR-proADM to predict organ damage and long-term mortality in sepsis patients, compared to that of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and lactate., Methods: This was a prospective observational cohort, enrolling severe sepsis or septic shock patients admitted to internal service department. The association between biomarkers and 90-day mortality was assessed by Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves. The accuracy of biomarkers for mortality was determined by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis., Results: A total of 148 patients with severe sepsis, according to the criteria of the campaign to survive sepsis, were enrolled. Eighty-five (57.4%) had sepsis according to the new criteria of Sepsis-3. MR-proADM showed the best AUROC to predict sepsis as defined by the Sepsis-3 criteria (AUROC of 0.771, 95% CI 0.692-0.850, p <0.001) and was the only marker independently associated with Sepsis-3 criteria (OR = 4.78, 95% CI 2.25-10.14; p < 0.001) in multivariate analysis. MR-proADM was the biomarker with the best AUROC to predict mortality in 90 days (AUROC of 0.731, CI 95% 0.612-0.850, p <0.001) and was the only marker that kept its independence [hazard ratio (HR) of 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.64, p <0.001] in multivariate analysis. The cut-off point of MR-proADM of 1.8 nmol/L (HR of 4.65, 95% CI 6.79-10.1, p < 0.001) was the one that had greater discriminative capacity to predict 90 days mortality. All patients with MR-proADM concentrations ≤0.60 nmol/L survived up to 90 days. In patients with SOFA ≤ 6, the addition of MR-proADM to SOFA score increased the ability of SOFA to identify non-survivors, AUROC of 0.65 (CI 95% 0.537-0.764) and AUROC of 0.700 (CI 95% 0.594-0.800), respectively (p < 0.05 for both)., Conclusions: MR-proADM is a good biomarker in the early identification of high risk septic patients and may contribute to improve the predictive capacity of SOFA scale, especially when scores are low., (Copyright © 2017 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) in predicting mortality in septic patients during hospitalization with mortality risk<10% evaluated by Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)., Material and Methods: Prospective, observational study performed in sepsis patients with SOFA risk<10%. We obtained levels of biomarkers in the first 72h after admission in hospital. All patients were monitored during hospitalization or until death. We used ROC curves to determine area under curve (AUC) and identify the best cutoff concentrations to predict mortality., Results: A total of 174 patients were analyzed. Seventeen (9.8%) patients died during hospitalization. The AUC of NT-proBNP was 0.793 (95% CI 0.686-0.9; P<.0005) compared to AUC of CRP (0.728; 95% CI 0.617-0.839; P=.004) and AUC of PCT (0.684; 95% CI 0.557-0.811; P=.019). Factors independently associated with in-hospital mortality were NT-proBNP>1,330pg/ml (OR=23.23; 95% CI 2.92-182.25; P=.003) and to have predisposing factors (OR=3.05; 95% CI 1.3-9.3; P=.044) CONCLUSIONS: In patients with low mortality risk according to SOFA score, NT-proBNP obtained in the first 72h after admission prove to be a powerful predictor of mortality. Their implementations in clinical practice would improve the predictive ability of clinical severity scores., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To develop a nomograph to predict a poor outcome (death during hospitalization or a hospital stay longer than 15 days) in emergency patients with sepsis and at low risk of organ damage according to Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)., Material and Methods: Prospective, observational study carried out in a single universitary hospital. All patients admitted from the emergency department with sepsis and SOFA scores of 6 or lower were enrolled. We used bivariate logistic regression analysis to develop a predictive nomogram., Results: A total of 174 patients were included. Seventeen patients (9.8%) died during hospitalization and the average hospital stay was greater than 15 days in 29 (16.7%) patient. The outcome was poor in a total of 42 patients (24.1%);. Independent variables that were significantly associated with a poor outcome were SOFA score (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% CI, 1.06-1.71; P<.05), C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.0-1.09; P<.05), N-terminal fragment of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration over 1330 ng/mL (OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.17-6.22; P<.05), and septic shock (OR, 8.3; 95% CI, 1.16-166.5; P<.05). For a SOFA score of 2 or more the crude OR was 4.44 (95%, CI, 1.91-10.34) and the OR adjusted for other variables was 3.08 (95% CI, 1.24-7.69)., Conclusion: A high percentage of patients predicted to be at low risk of organ failure had poor outcomes, associated with SOFA score, the presence of septic shock, CRP concentration, and elevated NT-proBNP concentration. The SOFA score by itself is an inadequate prognostic tool in patients at low risk of organ damage. Other clinical and analytical variables are required to complement the SOFA score.