Search

Palliative sedation is used to relieve end-of-life refractory symptoms.The objective of this study was to describe the use of palliative sedation in patients who die in internal medicine departments.An observational, cross-sectional, retrospective, and multicenter clinical audit study was conducted in 145 hospitals in Spain and Argentina. Each hospital included the first 10 patients who died in the internal medicine department, starting on December 1, 2015.We included 1447 patients, and palliative sedation was administered to 701 patients (48.4%). Having a terminal illness (odds ratio [OR] 2.469, 95% CI 1.971-3.093, P 0.001) and the length of hospital stay (OR 1.011, 95% CI 1.002-1.021, P = 0.017) were independently associated with the use of palliative sedation. Consent was granted by the families of 582 (83%) patients. The most common refractory symptom was dyspnea, and the most commonly used drugs for sedation were midazolam (77%) and morphine (89.7%). An induction dose was administered in 25.7% of the patients. Rescue doses were scheduled for 70% of the patients, and hydration was maintained in 49.5%. Pain was more common in patients with cancer, whereas dyspnea was more common in those without cancer. Rescue doses were used more often for the patients with cancer (77.8% vs. 67.7%, P = 0.015). Monitoring the palliative sedation with a scale was more frequent in the patients with cancer (23.7% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.008).Palliative sedation is used more often for terminal patients. There are differences in the administration of palliative sedation between patients with and without cancer.

Background Post-marketing data are required to confirm the durability and the long-term benefit and safety of UST in CD in clinical practice. Our aims were: (1) to evaluate the retention rate of UST in CD patients and to identify predictive factors of UST discontinuation; (2) to assess UST short-term effectiveness; (3) to analyse the durability of the response to UST in the long-term; and (4) to evaluate the safety of UST in clinical practice. Methods Retrospective, multicentre study (>60 centres). Patients with active CD [(Harvey–Bradshaw (HBI) >4)] that received at least one dose of UST intravenously before July 2018 were included. Clinical activity plus biochemical parameters were assessed at every UST administration. Clinical remission was defined as HBI score ≤4, and clinical response as a decrease in HBI ≥3 points. Loss of efficacy was defined as reappearance of symptoms that led to intensify the treatment dose, add another medication to control CD, switching or surgery in patients with short-term remission. The retention rate of UST treatment and the cumulative incidence of loss of efficacy were evaluated by survival curves, and predictive factors were assessed by Cox-regression. The short-term response was evaluated at week 8 and after the induction (week 16). Factors associated with short-term remission were assessed by multivariate analysis. Adverse events were recorded. Data quality was assured by remote monitoring. Results 331 CD patients have been included up to date (Table 1). The incidence rate of UST discontinuation was 15% per patient-year of follow-up: 8%, 13% and 20% at 6, 12 and 18 months (Figure 1). Previous surgery was the only factor associated with a higher risk of UST discontinuation [Hazard ratio (HR) = 2.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.1–3.6]. Short-term efficacy is shown in Figure 2. Previous surgery (OR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.2–0.6) and higher HBI score at baseline (OR = 0.8, 95% CI=0.8–0.9) were associated with an impaired response to UST at week 16. The cumulative incidence of loss of response was 32% per-patient-year of follow-up (Figure 3); A higher HBI score at baseline was associated with a higher risk of losing response (HR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1–1.3). Neither the concomitant treatment with immunosuppressants nor the number of previous biologics were associated with UST short- and long-term benefit. Thirty adverse events were reported in 25 (7%) patients (Table 2). Conclusion Sustain is the largest real clinical practice study of UST to treat CD patients with the longest follow-up reported to date. UST was demonstrated to be effective in real-world use in the short and long run. Safety was consistent with the known profile of UST.

Introduction Prevalence of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is higher in patients born between 1955–1975. The aim was to perform an economic evaluation of an age-based electronic health record (EHR) alert in primary care to detect patients with undiagnosed CHC and its treatment in comparison with non-use of the alert system, in Valencian Community, Spain. Materials and methods Decision trees and Markov model were used to evaluate the diagnosis and progression of the disease, respectively. CHC was diagnosed by serology and viral load in seropositive subjects. Epidemiological data and diagnostic costs were extracted from public sources of the Valencian Community. Probabilities, utilities and costs of model states were obtained from the literature. The impact on mortality and hepatic complications avoided by the implementation of the alert were estimated, and efficiency was measured as an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) based on quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the costs of both alternatives. Results The EHR alert detected 269,548 patients, of whom 1,331 had CHC (vs. 23 patients with non-alert). Over the patients’ lifetime, the alert would prevent 93% of decompensated cirrhosis cases, 87% of hepatocellular carcinomas, 90% of liver transplants, and 89% of liver related deaths compared to non-use of the alert system. In addition, it would obtain an additional 3.3 QALY per patient, with an incremental cost of €10,880 and an ICUR of €3,321. Conclusions The implementation of an age-based EHR alert in primary care to detect patients with CHC reduces hepatic complications and mortality and is an efficient strategy.

Background The effectiveness of the switch to another anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agent is not known. The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of treatment with a second and third anti-TNF drug after intolerance to or failure of a previous anti-TNF agent in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Methods We included patients diagnosed with IBD from the ENEIDA registry who received another anti-TNF after intolerance to or failure of a prior anti-TNF agent. Results A total of 1122 patients were included. In the short term, remission was achieved in 55% of the patients with the second anti-TNF. The incidence of loss of response was 19% per patient-year with the second anti-TNF. Combination therapy (hazard ratio [HR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8–3; P < 0.0001) and ulcerative colitis vs Crohn’s disease (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1–2.1; P = 0.005) were associated with a higher probability of loss of response. Fifteen percent of the patients had adverse events, and 10% had to discontinue the second anti-TNF. Of the 71 patients who received a third anti-TNF, 55% achieved remission. The incidence of loss of response was 22% per patient-year with a third anti-TNF. Adverse events occurred in 7 patients (11%), but only 1 stopped the drug. Conclusions Approximately half of the patients who received a second anti-TNF achieved remission; nevertheless, a significant proportion of them subsequently lost response. Combination therapy and type of IBD were associated with loss of response. Remission was achieved in almost 50% of patients who received a third anti-TNF; nevertheless, a significant proportion of them subsequently lost response.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with Crohn's disease experiencing endoscopic postoperative recurrence (POR) may benefit from antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents but scarce data on this are available. Our aim was to assess the efficacy of anti-TNF in improving mucosal lesions in patients with endoscopic POR. METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective, study of patients with Crohn's disease who underwent therapy with anti-TNF agents for endoscopic POR (Rutgeerts score > i1). Treatment outcomes were assessed by the findings in the last ileocolonoscopy performed after anti-TNF therapy was initiated. Endoscopic improvement and remission were defined as any reduction in the baseline Rutgeerts score and by a Rutgeerts score < i2, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients were included, 83 were treated with infliximab and 96 with adalimumab. Median time on anti-TNF therapy at the last endoscopic assessment was 31 months (interquartile range, 13-54). Endoscopic improvement was observed in 61%, including 42% who achieved endoscopic remission. Concomitant use of thiopurines and treatment with infliximab were associated with endoscopic improvement (odds ratio [OR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-4.46; P = 0.03, and OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.18-4.62; P < 0.01, respectively) and endoscopic remission (OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.65-6.05; P < 0.01, and OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.05-3.88; P = 0.04, respectively) in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. These results were confirmed in a propensity-matched score analysis. DISCUSSION: In patients with endoscopic POR, anti-TNF agents improve mucosal lesions in almost two-thirds of the patients. In this setting, concomitant use of thiopurines and use of infliximab seem to be more effective in improving mucosal lesions.

Purpose The aim was to estimate seroprevalence and prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in a small health area of the Valencian Community, Spain. Patients and methods This is a descriptive cross-sectional study aimed at estimation of HCV infection prevalence in the whole adult population (25-70 years old), that is, a pilot study for an eventual population-based screening program. Results A total of 5849 participants aged 25-70 years (51% male) were invited to participate by regular mail. Overall, 143 letters were returned owing to errors in the addresses. Of 5706 participants, 2637 (46.2%) participated in the study. Rapid test of anti-HCV antibody detection was positive in 30 cases (HCV seroprevalence 1.14%, 95% confidence intervals: 0.73-1.55%). Of those, seven were not aware of their condition. Participants who had a positive result in the rapid test of anti-HCV detection were given a confirmatory test by enzyme immune assay, and all had a positive result. RNA-HCV determination by quantitative PCR in positive anti-HCV patients showed positive viremia in 13 (43.3%) cases, of which five were not aware of the disease. Of the 17 patients who had negative viremia, two were unaware of their HCV status, one was a carrier of anti-HCV and was already aware of his condition, and 14 had been previously treated with satisfactory results. Regarding fibrosis, of the seven patients who were unaware of HCV infection, none of them had significant fibrosis. Moreover, 26 (86.7%) anti-HCV positive patients were reported to have one or more risk factors for HCV infection. Conclusion HCV screening strategies applied to the general population are good means to diagnose and treat patients who are not aware of their infection, avoiding new transmissions as well as disease progression.Copyright (C) 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study sought to determine the prevalence of malnutrition in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, to analyse the dietary beliefs and behaviours of these patients, to study their body composition, to evaluate their muscular strength and to identify the factors associated with malnutrition in these patients. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicentre study. Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients from 30 Spanish centres, from the outpatient clinics, were included. A questionnaire of 11 items was applied to obtain data from patients' dietary behaviour and beliefs. Patients who accepted were evaluated to assess their nutritional status using Subjective Global Assessment and body mass index. Body composition was evaluated through bioelectrical impedance. RESULTS: A total of 1271 patients were included [51% women, median age 45 years, 60% Crohn's disease]. Of these, 333 patients underwent the nutritional evaluation. A total of 77% of patients declared that they avoided some foods to prevent disease relapse. Eighty-six per cent of patients avoided some foods when they had disease activity because of fear of worsening the flare. Sixty-seven per cent of patients modified their dietary habits after disease diagnosis. The prevalence of malnutrition was 16% [95% confidence interval = 12-20%]. In the multivariate analysis, history of abdominal surgery, active disease and avoidance of some foods during flares were associated with higher risk of malnutrition. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of malnutrition in inflammatory bowel disease patients was high. We identified some predictive factors of malnutrition. Most of the patients had self-imposed food restrictions, based on their beliefs.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to assess the risk of relapse after discontinuation of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), to identify the factors associated with relapse, and to evaluate the overcome after retreatment with the same anti-TNF in those who relapsed. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, multicenter study. IBD patients who had been treated with anti-TNFs and in whom these drugs were discontinued after clinical remission was achieved were included. RESULTS: A total of 1,055 patients were included. The incidence rate of relapse was 19% and 17% per patient-year in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients, respectively. In both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients in deep remission, the incidence rate of relapse was 19% per patient-year. The treatment with adalimumab vs. infliximab (hazard ratio (HR)=1.29; 95% confi dence interval (CI)= 1.01-1.66), elective discontinuation of anti-TNFs (HR=1.90; 95% CI= 1.07-3.37) or discontinuation because of adverse events (HR= 2.33; 95% CI= 1.27-2.02) vs. a top-down strategy, colonic localization (HR= 1.51; 95% CI= 1.13-2.02) vs. ileal, and stricturing behavior (HR= 1.5; 95% CI= 1.09-2.05) vs. inflammatory were associated with a higher risk of relapse in Crohn's disease patients, whereas treatment with immunomodulators after discontinuation (HR= 0.67; 95% CI= 0.51-0.87) and age (HR= 0.98; 95% CI= 0.97-0.99) were protective factors. None of the factors were predictive in ulcerative colitis patients. Retreatment of relapse with the same anti-TNF was effective (80% responded) and safe. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence rate of infl ammatory bowel disease relapse after anti-TNF discontinuation is relevant. Some predictive factors of relapse after anti-TNF withdrawal have been identifi ed. Retreatment with the same anti-TNF drug was effective and safe.

Purpose: Some new staging systems in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been described in the last years. The aim of this study was to compare the survival-predicting capacity of some variables and the prognostic classifications. Methods: Demographic, clinical, analytical variables and tumour characteristics were collected in a study including 115 patients with HCC. Predictors of survival were identified using the Kaplan–Meier test and the Cox model. Comparison between different staging systems was carried out. Results: The 1-, 2- and 3-year estimated survival was 65%, 45% and 30%, respectively. Child–Pugh score and α-fetoprotein level greater than 400 UI/l were independent predictors of survival in the Cox model. Although all systems correctly differentiated between patients regarding survival (Kaplan–Meier, log rank

It has been suggested that high doses of statins can be more effective in reducing the incidence of new cardiovascular events than conventional doses. The present study analyzed the effect of increasing the atorvastatin dose to 80 mg/day on indices of inflammation (C-reactive protein or CRP), thrombogenesis (prothrombin fragment [F1+2]) and fibrinolysis (tissue-type plasminogen activator antigen, t-PA, and its inhibitor PAI-1) in high-risk patients with ischemic heart disease.We studied 27 patients with high-risk coronary heart disease who had lipid levels above those recommended despite treatment with atorvastatin at 40 mg/day. At baseline, patients were compared with 21 normocholesterolemic subjects without arteriosclerotic disease. Twenty-four patients were reevaluated 3 months after the atorvastatin dose was increased to 80 mg/day.The CRP, F1+2, t-PA and PAI-1 levels were significantly higher in patients than control subjects (all P.05). After the atorvastatin dose was increased, significant reductions in CRP, F1+2, and PAI-1 levels were observed (P.05). There was a significant positive correlation between the reduction in cholesterol level and that in F1+2 (r=0.43; P=.023). No other significant correlations were found.In a group of patient with high-risk heart disease and elevated lipid levels, increasing the atorvastatin dose led to significant improvements in inflammatory, thrombogenic, and hypofibrinolytic states.