Search

Background: Activation of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (TREM-1) pathway is associated with septic shock outcomes. Data suggest that modulation of this pathway in patients with activated TREM-1 might improve survival. Soluble TREM-1 (sTREM-1), a potential mechanism-based biomarker, might facilitate enrichment of patient selection in clinical trials of nangibotide, a TREM-1 modulator. In this phase 2b trial, we aimed to confirm the hypothesis that TREM1 inhibition might improve outcomes in patients with septic shock., Methods: This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial assessed the efficacy and safety of two different doses of nangibotide compared with placebo, and aimed to identify the optimum treatment population, in patients across 42 hospitals with medical, surgical, or mixed intensive care units (ICUs) in seven countries. Non-COVID-19 patients (18-85 years) meeting the standard definition of septic shock, with documented or suspected infection (lung, abdominal, or urinary [in patients ≥65 years]), were eligible within 24 h of vasopressor initiation for the treatment of septic shock. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to intravenous nangibotide 0·3 mg/kg per h (low-dose group), nangibotide 1·0 mg/kg per h (high-dose group), or matched placebo, using a computer-generated block randomisation scheme (block size 3). Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. Patients were grouped according to sTREM-1 concentrations at baseline (established from sepsis observational studies and from phase 2a change to data) into high sTREM-1 (≥ 400 pg/mL). The primary outcome was the mean difference in total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score from baseline to day 5 in the low-dose and high-dose groups compared with placebo, measured in the predefined high sTREM-1 (≥ 400 pg/mL) population and in the overall modified intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints included all-cause 28-day mortality, safety, pharmacokinetics, and evaluation of the relationship between TREM-1 activation and treatment response. This study is registered with EudraCT, 2018-004827-36, and Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04055909., Findings: Between Nov 14, 2019, and April 11, 2022, of 402 patients screened, 355 were included in the main analysis (116 in the placebo group, 118 in the low-dose group, and 121 in the high-dose group). In the preliminary high sTREM-1 population (total 253 [71%] of 355; placebo 75 [65%] of 116; low-dose 90 [76%] of 118; high-dose 88 [73%] of 121), the mean difference in SOFA score from baseline to day 5 was 0·21 (95% CI -1·45 to 1·87, p=0·80) in the low-dose group and 1·39 (-0·28 to 3·06, p=0·104) in the high-dose group versus placebo. In the overall population, the difference in SOFA score from baseline to day 5 between the placebo group and low-dose group was 0·20 (-1·09 to 1·50; p=0·76),and between the placebo group and the high-dose group was 1·06 (-0·23 to 2·35, p=0·108). In the predefined high sTREM-1 cutoff population, 23 (31%) patients in the placebo group, 35 (39%) in the low-dose group, and 25 (28%) in the high-dose group had died by day 28. In the overall population, 29 (25%) patients in the placebo, 38 (32%) in the low-dose, and 30 (25%) in the high-dose group had died by day 28. The number of treatment-emergent adverse events (111 [96%] patients in the placebo group, 113 [96%] in the low-dose group, and 115 [95%] in the high-dose group) and serious treatment-emergent adverse events (28 [24%], 26 [22%], and 31 [26%]) was similar between all three groups. High-dose nangibotide led to a clinically relevant improvement in SOFA score (of two points or more) from baseline to day 5 over placebo in those with higher cutoff concentrations (≥532 pg/mL) of sTREM-1 at baseline. Low dose nangibotide displayed a similar pattern with lower magnitude of effect across all cutoff values., Interpretation: This trial did not achieve the primary outcome of improvement in SOFA score at the predefined sTREM-1 value. Future studies are needed to confirm the benefit of nangibotide at higher concentrations of TREM-1 activation., Funding: Inotrem., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SL, MS-M, J-JG, MD, TH, and VC are employees of Inotrem. BF, ML, and P-FL are members of the steering committee. BF reports personal fees for consulting from Aridis, Enlivex, AM-Pharma, Combioxin, Nektar, GSK, and Inotrem outside of the submitted work. J-JG, MD, MS-M, SG, SL, and TH hold shares in Inotrem. J-PM reports payments for lectures and travel support from Fresenius and Roche and takes part in an advisory board with AM-Pharma, outside of the submitted work. JV reports sponsoring fees from Inotrem during the conduct of the study. MB reports grants from Novo Nordisk Foundation, Sygeforsikringen Danmark, and Svend Andersen Foundation, is the national coordinator for the REVIVAL study from AM-Pharma and is involved with the ESICM, outside of the submitted work. MD is designated as an inventor on a patent. P-FL reports consulting fees from Adrenomed and Inotrem outside of the submitted work. RF reports personal fees from Inotrem, during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Shionogi, Pfizer, MSD, Thermofisher, Menarini, Cytosorb, and Gilead, outside of the submitted work. SG reports consulting fees from Inotrem outside of the submitted work and is designated as an inventor on a patent related to Inotrem. SL reports personal fees from the UK COVID Therapeutics Advisory Panel and holds share in Critical Pressure outside of the submitted work. J-JG reports consulting fees from Inotrem during the conduct of the study and outside of the submitted work. CB, EM, IV, JL, J-MG, NA, NDS, TF, VH, VJ, and VP have no conflict of interests to report., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Activation of the TREM-1 pathway is associated with outcome in life threatening COVID-19. Data suggest that modulation of this pathway with nangibotide, a TREM-1 modulator may improve survival in TREM-1 activated patients (identified using the biomarker sTREM-1)., Methods: Phase 2 double-blind randomized controlled trial assessing efficacy, safety, and optimum treatment population of nangibotide (1.0 mg/kg/h) compared to placebo. Patients aged 18-75 years were eligible within 7 days of SARS-CoV-2 documentation and within 48 h of the onset of invasive or non-invasive respiratory support because of COVID-19-related ARDS. Patients were included from September 2020 to April 2022, with a pause in recruitment between January and August 2021. Primary outcome was the improvement in clinical status defined by a seven-point ordinal scale in the overall population with a planned sensitivity analysis in the subgroup of patients with a sTREM-1 level above the median value at baseline (high sTREM-1 group). Secondary endpoints included safety and all-cause 28-day and day 60 mortality. The study was registered in EudraCT (2020-001504-42) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04429334)., Findings: The study was stopped after 220 patients had been recruited. Of them, 219 were included in the mITT analysis. Nangibotide therapy was associated with an improved clinical status at day 28. Fifty-two (52.0%) of patients had improved in the placebo group compared to 77 (64.7%) of the nangibotide treated population, an odds ratio (95% CI) for improvement of 1.79 (1.02-3.14), p = 0.043. In the high sTREM-1 population, 18 (32.7%) of placebo patients had improved by day 28 compared to 26 (48.1%) of treated patients, an odds ratio (95% CI) of 2.17 (0.96-4.90), p = 0.063 was observed. In the overall population, 28 (28.0%) of placebo treated patients were not alive at the day 28 visit compared to 19 (16.0%) of nangibotide treated patients, an absolute improvement (95% CI) in all-cause mortality at day 28, adjusted for baseline clinical status of 12.1% (1.18-23.05). In the high sTREM-1 population (n = 109), 23 (41.8%) of patients in the placebo group and 12 (22.2%) of patients in the nangibotide group were not alive at day 28, an adjusted absolute reduction in mortality of 19.9% (2.78-36.98). The rate of treatment emergent adverse events was similar in both placebo and nangibotide treated patients., Interpretation: Whilst the study was stopped early due to low recruitment rate, the ESSENTIAL study demonstrated that TREM-1 modulation with nangibotide is safe in COVID-19, and results in a consistent pattern of improved clinical status and mortality compared to placebo. The relationship between sTREM-1 and both risk of death and treatment response merits further evaluation of nangibotide using precision medicine approaches in life threatening viral pneumonitis., Funding: The study was sponsored by Inotrem SA., Competing Interests: SL, MSM, JJG, MD, VC and ALLP are employees of Inotrem SA. BF, ML and PFL are members of the steering committee. BF reports personal fees for consulting from Aridis, Enlivex, AM-Pharma, and Inotrem outside the submitted work. JJG, MD, MSM, SG, SL and ALLP hold shares in Inotrem. MD, JJG, SG and MSM are designated as an inventor on patent(s) related to Inotrem. PFL reports consulting fees from Adrenomed and Inotrem outside the submitted work. SG and SL reports consulting fees from Inotrem outside the submitted work. SL is director and holds shares in Critical Pressure Ltd, and is designated as an inventor on a patent related to Critical Pressure Ltd, outside the submitted work. JJG reports consulting travelling support from Inotrem outside the submitted work. JH reports honoraria for lectures from Diagnostica Stago, Pfizer PFE France, Sanofi Aventis France, Inotrem, MSD, Octapharma and Shionogi outside the submitted wok. PA's institution received payment for the recruitment of patients in the study. JMG, CD, JPM, JPQ, JL, EM, JCL, CV, TF and JB have no conflict of interests to report., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Introduction: Septic shock is the subgroup of patients with sepsis, which presents as vasopressor dependence, an elevated blood lactate concentration and is associated with a mortality of at least 30%. Expression of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (TREM-1) pathway, measured using a serum biomarker of pathway activation (soluble TREM-1, sTREM-1) has been associated with outcome in septic shock. Preclinical and early phase patient data suggest that therapeutic modulation of this pathway may improve survival., Methods and Analysis: Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Nangibotide in Patients with Septic Shock is a phase IIb randomised controlled trial that will take place in up to 50 centres in seven countries and recruit 450 patients with septic shock to receive either placebo or one of two doses of nangibotide, a novel regulator of the TREM-1 pathway. The primary outcome will be the impact of nangibotide therapy on the change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score from a baseline determined before initiation of study drug therapy. This will be assessed first in the patients with an elevated sTREM-1 level and then in the study population as a whole. In addition to safety, secondary outcomes of the study will include efficacy of nangibotide in relation to sTREM-1 levels in terms of organ function, mortality and long-term morbidity. This study will also facilitate the development of a novel platform for the measurement of sTREM-1 at the point of care., Ethics and Dissemination: The study has been approved by the responsible ethics committees/institutional review boards in all study countries: Belgium: Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen, France: CPP Ile de France II, Denmark: Region Hovedstaden, Spain: ethics committee from Valld'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Finland: Tukija, Ireland: St. James' Hospital (SJH) / Tallaght University Hospital (TUH) Joint Research Ethics Committee, USA: Lifespan, Providence TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: EudraCT Number: 2018-004827-36 and NCT04055909., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The authors have the following interests: SL, MS-M, JJG, SW and VC are employees of Inotrem SA. BF is the principal investigator of the trial and is a member of the steering committee., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: Nangibotide is a specific TREM-1 inhibitor that tempered deleterious host-pathogens interactions, restored vascular function, and improved survival, in animal septic shock models. This study evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of nangibotide and its effects on clinical and pharmacodynamic parameters in septic shock patients., Methods: This was a multicenter randomized, double-blind, two-stage study. Patients received either continuous infusion of nangibotide (0.3, 1.0, or 3.0 mg/kg/h) or placebo. Treatment began < 24 h after shock onset and continued for up to 5 days. Safety primary outcomes were adverse events (AEs), whether serious or not, and death. Exploratory endpoints evaluated nangibotide effects on pharmacodynamics, organ function, and mortality, and were analyzed according to baseline sTREM-1 concentrations., Results: Forty-nine patients were randomized. All treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs) were collected until Day 28. No significant differences were observed in TEAEs between treatment groups. No drug withdrawal linked to TEAE nor appearance of anti-drug antibodies were reported. Nangibotide pharmacokinetics appeared to be dose-proportional and clearance was dose-independent. Nangibotide did not significantly affect pharmacodynamic markers. Decrease in SOFA score LS mean change (± SE) from baseline to Day 5 in pooled nangibotide groups versus placebo was - 0.7 (± 0.85) in the randomized population and - 1.5 (± 1.12) in patients with high baseline plasma sTREM-1 concentrations (non-significant). This pattern was similar to organ support end points., Conclusion: No significant increases in TEAEs were detected in nangibotide-treated patients versus placebo. These results encourage further evaluation of nangibotide and further exploration of plasma sTREM-1 concentrations as a predictive efficacy biomarker.

Aims: The peptide nangibotide is the first clinical-stage agent targeting the immunoreceptor TREM-1 (triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1) and is being investigated as a novel therapy for acute inflammatory disorders such as septic shock. This first-in-man, randomized, double-blind, ascending dose, placebo-controlled Phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of nangibotide., Methods: Twenty-seven healthy subjects (aged 18-45 years) were randomized into eight groups. Nangibotide was administered as a single continuous intravenous infusion. The first two groups received a single i.v. dose of 1 and 10 mg, respectively, over 15 min. Subsequent groups were randomized in a product : placebo ratio of 3:1 at doses ranging from 0.03 to 6 mg kg -1  h -1 over 7 h 45 min, preceded by a 15-minute loading dose of up to 5 mg kg -1 ., Results: Nangibotide was safe and well tolerated up to the highest dose tested. There were only few adverse events and they were mild in severity and considered unrelated to treatment. Nangibotide displayed dose-proportional PK properties, with a clearance of 6.6 l kg -1  h -1 for a subject of 70 kg and a 3 min effective half-life, which are compatible with extensive enzymatic metabolism in blood. Central and peripheral volumes of distribution were 16.7 l and 15.9 l respectively, indicating limited distribution of the drug mainly in blood and interstitial fluid. No circulating anti-drug antibodies were detectable up to 28 days after administration., Conclusions: The novel immunomodulator nangibotide displayed favourable safety and PK profiles at all doses, including expected pharmacologically active doses, and warrants further clinical development., (© 2018 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Background: The cardiovascular (CV) safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors has been the subject of considerable debate., Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the risk of CV events with lumiracoxib by meta-analysis of all completed, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of > or =1 week and up to 1 year in duration of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis., Methods: The Novartis Lumiracoxib Clinical Trial Database, which includes all clinical studies conducted to date with lumiracoxib, was reviewed. Data were extracted from RCTs of > or =1 week and up to 1 year in duration, the maximum study duration; 34,668 patients were included in standard and cumulative meta-analyses. Twenty-two RCTs of lumiracoxib 100 to 1200 mg daily were identified; 22,781 patients were included in 1-year trials. Mean age of the patients was 61.5 years and 74% were female. More than 50% of the patients in these studies had hypertension at baseline and 6% had diabetes. Parameters analyzed were the Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration (APTC) composite CV end point of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic), and CV death; MI alone; and stroke alone. Twenty-one of the 22 RCTs have been published., Results: For all 3 parameters, relative risk (RR) was calculated versus non-naproxen NSAIDs, naproxen, and placebo. The results were as follows: for the APTC end point versus non-naproxen NSAIDs: RR 0.83, 95% CI, 0.46-1.51; versus naproxen: RR 1.49, 95% CI, 0.94-2.36; versus placebo: RR 1.08, 95% CI, 0.41-2.86; for MI alone versus non-naproxen NSAIDs: RR 0.80, 95% CI, 0.28-2.25; versus naproxen: RR 1.69, 95% CI, 0.82-3.48; versus placebo: RR 1.27, 95% CI, 0.25-6.56; and for stroke alone versus non-naproxen NSAIDs: RR 0.91, 95% CI, 0.35-2.35; versus naproxen: RR 1.42, 95% CI, 0.70-2.91; versus placebo: RR 0.59, 95% CI, 0.13-2.74. Cumulative meta-analyses of lumiracoxib versus all comparators (placebo, diclofenac, ibuprofen, celecoxib, rofecoxib, and naproxen) did not find any significant differences in APTC, MI alone, or stroke alone., Conclusion: This meta-analysis of 34,668 patients receiving > or =1 week and up to 1 year of treatment found no evidence that lumiracoxib was associated with a significant increase in CV risk compared with naproxen, placebo, or all comparators (placebo, diclofenac, ibuprofen, celecoxib, rofecoxib, and naproxen).

Background & Aims: Patient adherence to prescribed antiviral therapy in human immunodeficiency virus infection enhances response. We evaluated the impact of adherence to combination therapy with interferon or peginterferon plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C patients., Methods: We assessed the effect of dose reduction on sustained virologic response (SVR) from prior trials with interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin (n = 1010) or peginterferon alpha-2b 1.5 microg/kg/week plus ribavirin (n = 511). The actual treatment administered was verified from drug dispensing/return records and patient diaries. Two groups were defined: (1) patients who received >or=80% of both their total interferon and ribavirin doses for >or=80% of the expected duration of therapy and (2) patients who received reduced doses (<80% of one or both drugs for >or=80% of the expected duration of therapy). A statistical model provided comparative estimates of the response rates in compliant patients., Results: Most patients were at least 80% compliant with interferon alpha-2b/ribavirin or peginterferon alpha-2b/ribavirin therapy and had SVR rates of 52% and 63%, respectively, for the 2 regimens. This was most apparent for HCV-1-infected patients. The impacts of adherence on efficacy from subgroup analysis and the statistical modeling approach were similar., Conclusions: HCV-1-infected patients who can be maintained on >80% of their interferon or peginterferon alpha-2b and ribavirin dosage for the duration of treatment in the setting of a clinical trial exhibit enhanced sustained response rates. Our results suggest that adherence will enhance the likelihood of achieving an initial virologic response. Adherence beyond 12-24 weeks will be advantageous only for those patients who have achieved such an early virologic response.

The clinical use of measuring hepatic hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA before and after therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C has been assessed in a number of small clinical trials. Viral clearance from the liver may be a better marker of long-term response than eradication of serum HCV RNA. The aim of this study was to evaluate quantitative hepatic HCV-RNA measurements before and after antiviral therapy. Two thousand eighty-nine chronic hepatitis C patients were enrolled in 3 published clinical trials evaluating interferon alfa-2b alone or with ribavirin either as initial therapy or for interferon relapse. Hepatic HCV-RNA quantitation was performed with a modified reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) before and 24 weeks after therapy in 951 and 1,316 patients, respectively. Pretherapy hepatic HCV-RNA concentrations correlated best with serum HCV-RNA concentrations (R =.236, P =.0001) and negatively correlated with alanine transaminase (ALT) values (-0.178, P =.0001), duration of infection (-0.09, P =.02), parenchymal injury (-0.135, P =.0001), histologic activity index (HAI) inflammatory score (-0.085, P =.01), Knodell fibrosis score (-0.072, P =.03), and body weight (-0.078, P =.02). In paired liver biopsy specimens (n = 534), change in hepatic HCV RNA correlated with the change in the HAI (R =.346, P =.0001). Of 400 sustained virologic responders (SVR), 393 (98%) had undetectable hepatic HCV RNA, whereas 7 (2%) had detectable hepatic HCV RNA; 5 have been followed and 2 have had reappearance of serum HCV RNA 12 months after therapy. In conclusion, measurement of hepatic HCV RNA before or after therapy reflects changes observed in serum HCV RNA, and correlates inversely with hepatic inflammation and fibrosis, but otherwise has minimal clinical use.

In patients with chronic hepatitis C, 48 weeks of therapy with interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin results in a sustained virologic response of 40%. Preliminary analysis suggests that measuring HCV RNA at week 24, rather than week 12, might provide the best prediction of treatment response. To assess the clinical utility of serum HCV RNA determinations at different times during therapy as a predictor of a sustained virologic response we evaluated 912 treatment-naïve patients. Patients were randomized to receive IFN-alpha2b, 3 million units (MU) three times weekly (tiw), for 24 or 48 weeks with either ribavirin or placebo, and then followed for 24 weeks. Serum HCV RNA was measured at weeks 4 and 12 in patients treated for 24 weeks; at 4, 12, and 24 weeks during therapy in those treated for 48 weeks, and week 24 post-therapy in all patients. Sustained response was defined as loss of serum HCV RNA at week 24 follow-up. Other patients were considered virologic nonresponders. For patients receiving 48 weeks of combination therapy, detectable serum HCV RNA at week 24 predicted nonresponse (positive predictive value) in 99% of patients compared to 89% at week 12. In patients treated for 24 weeks, testing at week 12 was more predictive of nonresponse than testing at week 4 in the combination-therapy group but not in the monotherapy group. Hence, for combination therapy, testing for serum HCV RNA as a predictor of nonresponse is most accurate at week 24 of therapy; a positive test correctly identified 99% of nonresponders.

This article represents the proceedings of a workshop at the 2000 ISBRA Meeting in Yokohama, Japan. The chair was Manuela G. Neuman. The presentations were (1) New aspects of hepatic fibrosis, by D. A. Brenner; (2) Cellular immune response in hepatitis C models, by B. Rehermann; (3) The role of interleukin-10 in acute alcoholic hepatitis, by J. Taieb, S. Chollet-Martin, M. Cohard, J. J. Garaud, and T. Poynard; (4) Cytokine-mediated apoptosis in vitro, by M. G. Neuman; (5) Signaling for apoptosis and repair in vitro, by G. G. Katz, R. G. Cameron, N. H. Shear, and M. G. Neuman; (6) Interferons activate the P42/44 mitogen-activated protein kinase and Janus Kinase signal transducers and activation of transcription (JAK-STAT) signaling pathways in hepatocytes: Differential regulation by acute ethanol via a protein kinase C-dependent mechanism, by B. Gao; (7) Genetic polymorphisms of interleukin-1 in association with the development of Japanese alcoholic liver disease, by M. Takamatsu, M. Yamauchi, M. Ohata, S. Saito, S. Maeyama, T. Uchikoshi, and G. Toda; and (8) Increased levels of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in sera from patients with alcoholic liver diseases, by T. Kumagi, S. M. F. Akbar, M. Abe, K. Michitaka, N. Horiike, and M. Onji.

The pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered recombinant human interleukin-10 (rHuIL-10) were evaluated in 18 subjects with creatinine clearances (Clcr) between 2.7 and 116.7 mL/min/1.73 m2. Serum samples for rHuIL-10 were obtained over a 48-hour period after a single 25 micrograms/kg i.v. bolus infusion. AUC, total body clearance (Clp), and steady-state volume of distribution (Vdss) were derived by compartmental methods. Analysis of serum concentrations showed statistically significant group differences for log-transformed AUC and original scale Clp (p < 0.01). The AUC and effective half-life increased, while the mean Clp of rHuIL-10 decreased as renal function declined. A linear relationship between AUC and Clcr as well as Clp and Clcr demonstrates that the disposition of rHuIL-10 is altered in subjects with renal insufficiency. No serious adverse events were noted.

Neutrophils and monocytes are the major classes of phagocytes that migrate from the blood stream and accumulate in inflamed tissues in response to various chemoattractants. Because IL-10 is a potent anti-inflammatory cytokine, we analyzed its in vitro effect on chemotaxis using an under agarose method. We found that, as compared to prednisolone, IL-10 alone was a modest inhibitor of C5a, fMLP and IL-8-induced neutrophil chemotaxis, and C5a-induced monocyte chemotaxis. However, GM-CSF pretreatment of the cells potentiated this inhibitory effect. Similarly, the IL-10 induced modulation of the beta2 integrin CD11b/CD18 adhesion molecule expression was only observed on GM-CSF-preactivated neutrophils and monocytes. Taken together, these results suggest that the migration and accumulation of phagocytes at infection sites would not be significantly affected by IL-10 given as an immunomodulatory therapy.

A prospective, randomized multicentre study was conducted in order to evaluate the potentially superior tolerability profile of teicoplanin plus netilmicin compared with vancomycin plus netilmicin in patients in ICUs. We considered that these glycopeptides have been shown to have comparable efficacy and that comparative tolerability is of paramount importance, particularly in severely ill patients. A total of 56 patients were enrolled into the study (36 males and 20 females). Twenty-four patients were included in the teicoplanin plus netilmicin group (15 males, 9 females: mean age 56.8 years). The mean simplified acute physiological score (SAPS) was 9.4 (range 4-20). Thirty-two patients were randomized to receive vancomycin plus netilmicin (21 males, 11 females; mean age 56.4 years). The mean SAPS was 9.3 (range 2-16). Septicaemia was the most common infection (14 cases in each group). Most infections were caused by Staphylococcus aureus or coagulase-negative staphylococci. The mean daily doses were: for teicoplanin, 457 mg (6.7 mg/kg); for vancomycin, 1678 mg (24.4 mg/kg); and for netilmicin 263.3 mg (3.9 mg/kg) in the teicoplanin group and 248 mg (3.8 mg/kg) in the vancomycin group. The trough levels of teicoplanin in the serum remained mostly between 7 and 10 mg/l, while more fluctuation was seen in patients receiving vancomycin. The mean trough levels of netilmicin in the serum were 1.2 (SD 0.9) mg/l in the teicoplanin group, compared with 1.7 (SD 1.4) mg/l in the vancomycin group (NS: p > 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The tolerance and pharmacokinetic behaviour of a new injectable streptogramin antibiotic, RP 59500 were evaluated on 26 healthy male volunteers in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I study. The doses used were 1.4, 2.8, 4.6, 7.0, 9.8, 12.6, 16.8, 22.4 and 29.4 mg/kg; each dose was administered as a 1 h infusion to eight subjects, two of them receiving placebo. Blood levels of RP 59500 were measured by both microbiological and HPLC assays. At the end of the infusion, Cmax for RP 59500 ranged from 0.95 +/- 0.22 to 24.20 +/- 8.82 mg/L. The apparent elimination half-life of the compound ranged from 1.27 to 1.53 h. RP 59500 did not significantly affect any of the laboratory or clinical assessments (blood pressure, pulse rate, ECG, peak expiratory flow rate). Reported adverse effects were of mild intensity; the most frequent event was mild pain or burning at the infusion site with doses of 7 mg/kg or higher. These results support further studies of RP 59500 in phase II clinical trials.

Peak and trough vancomycin serum levels were measured in 37 severely ill patients following dosing using the Moellering nomogram. The peak and trough serum concentrations were 61.2 +/- 23 and 22.6 +/- 16.5 mg/l, respectively, and higher than expected. Vancomycin pharmacokinetics obtained from 10 other patients were also studied. In five patients with a creatinine clearance greater than 1 ml min-1 kg-1, a mean plasma elimination half-life of 7.8 +/- 2.8 h was calculated. In the five other patients with markedly reduced renal function (creatinine clearance less than or equal to 1 ml min-1 kg-1), the mean elimination half-life was 18.3 +/- 10.2 h. A correlation was observed between the vancomycin and creatinine clearance. Important inter-patient variations of vancomycin clearance for the same creatinine clearance was also noted. Tubular damage in critically ill patients with severe sepsis may explain our results of the decreased vancomycin elimination.

The tubular disposition of five aminoglycosides was studied in humans to establish a possible relationship between tubular reabsorption and the nephrotoxicity that has been described in the literature. Thirty-three healthy male volunteers received a continuous intravenous infusion of isotonic saline with inulin, followed 1 h later by inulin plus gentamicin, dibekacin, tobramycin, netilmicin, or amikacin (1 mg/kg per h) or amikacin (4 mg/kg per h) over a period of 2 h. Brain-stem-evoked response audiometry was performed both before and at the end of each infusion. The latency of wave V remained constant whichever antibiotic was considered. The glomerular filtration rate did not vary significantly during the infusion of each drug. The percent fractional excretion was 79 +/- 6, 81 +/- 22, 85 +/- 5, and 99 +/- 9 for gentamicin, dibekacin, tobramycin, and netilmicin, respectively, and 83 +/- 4 and 124 +/- 13 for amikacin at concentrations of 1 and 4 mg/kg per h, respectively. Net balance and renal clearance were similar for the five aminoglycosides when administered at a rate of 1 mg/kg per h. With gentamicin only, fractional excretion was correlated with the urinary flow rate. We can conclude that (i) gentamicin, generally considered the most nephrotoxic agent, had the highest degree of net reabsorption; (ii) netilmicin exhibited a net zero tubular balance; (iii) amikacin had different patterns of tubular disposition according to the dose, i.e., reabsorption at 1 mg/kg per h and secretion at 4 mg/kg per h, raising the hypothesis of a saturable process of reabsorption; and (iv) these differences in tubular reabsorption could account at least in part for the known different nephrotoxic potentials of these five aminoglycosides in humans.

Among 409 cases of bacterial endocarditis (BE) observed from 1972 to 1985, 142 were caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Of these 142 cases, 59 affected native valves of the left heart (left BE), 47 affected native valves of the right heart (right BE) (including 36 drug-addicts), and 36 involved prosthetic valves (BEP) and were associated with mediastinitis in 11 cases. Symptoms were acute in 122 cases and subacute in 2 cases. 91 of the BE on native valves were primary (86%). Cutaneous manifestations were present in 38 cases (27%). Of the 67 patients who died (47%), 28/59 had left BE (47%), 7/47 had right BE (15%) (including 2 drug addicts) and 32/36 had BEP (86%); all differences were statistically significant. Complications consisted of: heart failure in 78 cases (55%), including 40 cases of left BE, 8 cases of right BE and 30 cases of BEP; systemic peripheral embolism in 29 cases (left BE 17, BEP 12) and neurological accidents in 58 cases (left BE 34, right BE 24). Thirty of these accidents occurred before the 4th day (left BE 13, BEP 17). Documented neurological accidents included cerebral haemorrhage (13 cases), cerebral infarction (14 cases) and cerebral abscess (4 cases); 4 of the 12 patients who underwent arteriography were found to have one or several aneurysms. Thirty-nine of these 58 patients died, death being directly due to a neurological cause in 20 cases (left BE 10, right BE 10).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The serum protein binding, extravascular diffusion and urinary excretion of pefloxacin were studied in rabbits. The effect of furosemide on the urinary excretion of pefloxacin was investigated. In an experimental model of Escherichia coli endocarditis, diffusion into heart valves and infected vegetations and bactericidal effect of pefloxacin were also studied. We observed a serum protein binding of 25%. Extravascular concentrations found were within the range of the minimal inhibitory concentrations for most susceptible strains. Pefloxacin appeared to be reabsorbed by renal tubules (fractional excretion: 61 +/- 21%). Furosemide significantly increased the renal excretion of pefloxacin through a tubular process. We observed a good penetration of pefloxacin into normal heart valves and infected vegetations. Pefloxacin reduced the colony counts in infected vegetations after seven im injections of the drug (given as 15 mg/kg/12 h).

Teicoplanin, a new glycopeptide antibiotic similar to vancomycin, was evaluated for the treatment of bacterial endocarditis in an open multicenter study from May 1985 to August 1987. A total of 20 patients with positive blood culture endocarditis received teicoplanin once daily as a mean intravenous injection of 7.3 mg/kg of body weight (range, 4.8 to 10.6 mg/kg); in 17 patients, teicoplanin was combined with another antibiotic, usually an aminoglycoside. The mean duration of therapy was 28 days (range, 7 to 66 days). The diagnosis of endocarditis was confirmed by echocardiography or anatomical findings in 15 patients and established on the basis of clinical manifestations plus positive blood cultures in 5 patients. The tricuspid valve was involved in 11 of the 20 patients. Isolates from blood were 12 Staphylococcus aureus, 1 Staphylococcus hominis, 1 Micrococcus sedentarius, 1 Enterococcus faecalis, 3 Streptococcus bovis, and 2 nongroupable Streptococcus sp. At the end of therapy, bacterial eradication was achieved in 17 of 20 patients (85%), and a favorable clinical outcome had occurred in 14 of 17 evaluable patients (82%). Of these 14 patients, one relapsed 4 months after the end of treatment. Thus, teicoplanin was effective in 13 of 17 patients (76%). Mean peak levels of teicoplanin in serum were lower, 23.1 +/- 2.9 micrograms/ml, in patients who failed than in those who were cured (45.8 +/- 8.4 micrograms/ml). Side effects occurred in 7 of 20 patients (35%), and required premature discontinuation of teicoplanin in 3 patients. These side effects were fever in three patients, rash in three patients, hearing loss in two patients, and increased serum transaminase levels in two patients. This study demonstrates the efficacy of teicoplanin in the treatment of endocarditis and the need for achieving peak levels in serum close to 40 micrograms/ml. Teicoplanin should now be further evaluated in endocarditis caused by gram-positive cocci means of controlled comparative study with standard therapy.

A multicentre open trial of teicoplanin in 81 centres in nine European countries included 1431 cases: 531 female, 900 male; mean age 49.4 years, range 1-93 years. These were hospitalized patients most of whom had infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus (816 isolates). Of a total of 1427 Gram-positive pathogens 280 (19.6%) were methicillin resistant. There were 536 skin and soft tissue infections, 263 septicaemias, 135 lower respiratory tract infections, 179 joint and bone infections and 83 endocarditides. More than a third of the infections were severe. Complicating medical factors were present in 69% of cases, including malignant disease in 14% and diabetes mellitus in 11%. Mean teicoplanin dose was 289 mg/day; mean duration of treatment was 14 days. A total of 471 patients received a high dose regimen, 400 mg teicoplanin daily for at least five days. Monotherapy with teicoplanin was used in 1037 cases and combination with other antibiotics in 394. Overall 91.7% of the 1333 evaluable cases were clinical cured or improved. The MIC of teicoplanin was less than or equal to 1 mg/l for 90% of Gram-positive isolates. Adverse events were reported in 189 cases (13.2%). The most common drug-related event was an allergic type skin reaction which occurred in 35 cases (2.4%). Transient hepatic dysfunction was reported in 28 patients (2.0%).

We studied the effect of the control of the hypothyroid state in humans on the pharmacokinetic parameters of cefazolin and gentamicin after a single intravenous injection. These two antibiotics were chosen because of their different patterns of binding to serum albumin (0% for gentamicin and 82% for cefazolin). In hypothyroidism, the behavior of cefazolin only was altered, with a decrease in the total body clearance, possibly due to reduced urinary excretion, and a decrease in the volume of distribution without a significant alteration of cefazolin binding to serum protein.

Seven patients with severe methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections (5 with bacterial endocarditis, 1 with mediastinitis and 1 with meningitis and septicaemia) were treated with rifampicin combined with vancomycin in 6 cases and with gentamicin in 1 case. The 7 strains initially isolated from haemocultures were resistant to methicillin and sensitive to rifampicin. In 4 of these patients (3 of whom received vancomycin and 1 gentamicin) clinical and bacteriological failure was observed, with selection of rifampicin-resistant mutants. Bactericidal activity was always mediocre in both serum and cerebrospinal fluid, with insufficient vancomycin and gentamicin concentrations in 3 patients. An in vitro study of the combined antibiotics by the chequer-board method suggested antagonism in 3 of these 4 cases. Thus, in spite of its excellent activity and unquestionable effectiveness, rifampicin should be used with caution in severe staphylococcal infections.

The pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin were studied in 15 adult patients in the acute phase of severe infections caused by gram-positive cocci. All the subjects were given a daily intravenous bolus dose of 6 mg of teicoplanin kg-1 (body weight). The pharmacokinetic study was performed over a 48-h period after injection 4. The subjects were categorized according to their mean creatinine clearances (ml.min-1.kg-1) during the study period: group 1 (n = 3), greater than 1.6; group 2 (n = 6), 0.8 to 1.6; and group 3 (n = 6), 0.15 to 0.8. Mean concentrations of teicoplanin in serum at 1, 24, and 48 h were 33 +/- 8, 9 +/- 3, and 6 +/- 2.5 micrograms.ml-1, respectively. The mean half-lives of the concentration-time curve from 12 to 48 h were 28 +/- 4, 44 +/- 24, and 48 +/- 14 h in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (group 3 versus group 1: P less than 0.05). The mean area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 h was 344 +/- 92 mg.h.liter-1, and the mean hybrid volume of distribution was 1.09 +/- 0.46 liter.kg-1. These values were similar for the three groups, with a trend for larger areas under the curve in group 3. Creatinine clearance correlated directly with the total body clearance of teicoplanin (r = 0.70) and with the renal clearance of teicoplanin (r = 0.82). However, in critically ill patients, the wide interindividual variations in pharmacokinetic parameters are more relevant than those related to the variations in renal function when creatinine clearance is above 0.30 ml.min-1.kg-1. We concluded that, in such conditions, monitoring of concentrations of teicoplanin in serum is mandatory.

A total of 88 patients were treated with teicoplanin for infections caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci in open clinical studies in France and the UK. Teicoplanin was administered once daily, with a mean dose of 323 mg, for a mean duration of 16 days. Thirty-nine patients received teicoplanin alone while 49 received combination treatment. Clinical cure or improvement occurred in 79 of 82 evaluable cases (96.3%) and bacteriological elimination in 82 cases (95.1%). Treatment with teicoplanin alone was clinically successful in all cases, including 20 septicaemias, and the elimination rate was 93%. There was no apparent correlation between clinical and bacteriological outcomes and results of in-vitro testing. The variation in MICs between France and the UK was attributed to differences in the methods used.

The pharmacokinetics of gentamicin and latamoxef (moxalactam) were examined in serum, normal heart valves, sterile cardiac vegetations and vegetations infected with Escherichia coli. Penetration of antibiotics into heart valves and vegetations was rapid; the maximum concentration was achieved in both sites at the end of a 20 min iv infusion. However, both antibiotics penetrated better into vegetations than into normal heart valves. In rabbits with left-sided endocarditis, similar antibiotic levels were found in infected vegetations after one or 22 im injections. After 11 im injections (one every 8 h) of latamoxef (15 mg/kg) the bacterial titre (cfu/g) was significantly reduced, but not nil, despite concentrations about 40 times the MBC for this antibiotic in the vegetations. Afer 22 im injections, vegetations in rabbits receiving latamoxef were sterile and were significantly reduced in those receiving gentamicin (1.5 mg/kg/im), concentrations of which in the vegetations were inferior to the MBC. Our results suggest that the in-vivo antibacterial effect depends on local antibiotic levels, kinetics of killing and duration of contact between antibiotic and bacteria.