Search

Background: A substantial portion of the genetic predisposition for breast cancer is explained by multiple common genetic variants of relatively small effect. A subset of these variants, which have been identified mostly in individuals of European and Asian ancestry, have been combined to construct a polygenic risk score (PRS) to predict breast cancer risk, but the prediction accuracy of existing PRSs in Hispanic/Latinx individuals (H/L) remain relatively low. We assessed the performance of several existing PRS panels with and without addition of H/L specific variants among self-reported H/L women., Methods: PRS performance was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)., Results: Both European and Asian PRSs performed worse in H/L samples compared to original reports. The best European PRS performed better than the best Asian PRS in pooled H/L samples. European PRSs had decreased performance with increasing Indigenous American (IA) ancestry while Asian PRSs had increased performance with increasing IA ancestry. The addition of 2 H/L SNPs increased performance for all PRSs, most notably in the samples with high IA ancestry and did not impact the performance of PRSs in individuals with lower IA ancestry., Conclusions: A single PRS that incorporates risk variants relevant to the multiple ancestral components of individuals from Latin America, instead of a set of ancestry specific panels, could be used in clinical practice., Impact: Results highlight the importance of population-specific discovery and suggest a straightforward approach to integrate ancestry specific variants into PRS for clinical application.

Background: The phase 3 CheckMate-743 trial demonstrated a prolonged overall survival (OS) benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab over chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with unresectable pleural mesothelioma (PM). However, given that Latin American (LATAM) patients were notably underrepresented in this trial, we retrospectively assessed the effectiveness and safety of this regimen in this population., Methods: This retrospective study included patients from 15 centers in LATAM with unresectable or metastatic PM treated with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in a real-world data (RWD) scenario. Demographic, clinicopathological characteristics, and safety data were collected from medical charts. Progression-free survival (PFS), and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: From June 2017, and January 2024 96 patients were included: epithelioid 78% (n = 75), 81% were ECOG 0-1 (n = 78). With a median follow-up of 24.1 months, median PFS and OS were 8 months (95% CI, 6.6-9.4), and 22 months (95% CI, 18.9-25), respectively. No statistical difference in OS was observed between epithelioid versus nonepithelioid histology (median 23 months vs. 19 months, respectively; P = .29). Treatment efficacy was also consistent among different clinical subgroups. Any and grade 3-4 adverse events were found in 43.1% (n = 28), and 18.5% (n = 12) of patients, respectively. Remarkably, no OS impact was observed in patients who had dose delay or treatment discontinuation due to immune-related adverse events, and those who experienced any adverse event., Conclusions: This multicenter RWD study demonstrated the clinically meaningful benefit of first-line ipilimumab and nivolumab in LATAM patients with unresectable or metastatic PM, and data is consistent with previous trial findings., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The genomic characteristics of Peruvian patients with gastric adenocarcinoma from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds were examined in consideration of the possibility that patients from different socioeconomic backgrounds may be exposed to different risk factors. We conducted a prospective pilot study in two Peruvian cities (Lima and Ica). This study enrolled 15 patients from low socioeconomic status (LSES) and 15 patients from medium/high socioeconomic status (MHSES). The genomic profiling of gastric adenocarcinoma samples was done through the FoundationOne CDx platform. We compared the genomic characteristics and the need for targeted therapy and immunotherapy between LSES and MHSES. The genes with higher rates of alterations were TP53 (73.3% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.2635); CDH1 (26.7% vs. 28.6%, P = 1); CDKN2A (20.0% vs. 28.6%, P = 1); KRAS (33.3% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.1686); ARID1A (20.0% vs. 14.3%, P = 1); MLL2 (13.3% vs. 21.4%, P = 1) and SOX9 (33.3% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.0421) in LSES versus HMSES, respectively. There was no significant difference in tumor mutational burden (P = 0.377) or microsatellite status (P = 1). The LSES group had a higher need for targeted therapy or immunotherapy according to gene involvement and alterations. A significant genomic difference exists among patients with gastric adenocarcinoma of different socioeconomic status, which may result in a different need for targeted therapy and immunotherapy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors have exhibited promising activity against advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC. However, co-occurring genetic alterations, such as CDKN2A/B or TP53, may negatively affect the efficacy of targeted therapies., Methods: From December 2017 to December 2022, this study cohort analyzed next-generation sequencing data of 116 patients with metastatic ALK-rearranged NSCLC from five Latin American cancer centers. Clinicopathologic and molecular features were associated with clinical outcomes and risk of brain metastasis (BrM) in patients with and without concurrent somatic alterations., Results: All patients (N = 116) received a second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and alectinib was selected in 87.2% of cases. Coalterations occurred in 62% of the cases; the most frequent were TP53 mutations (27%) and CDKN2A/B loss (18%). The loss of CDKN2A/B was associated with an increased risk of BrM, with a cumulative incidence of 33.3% versus 7.4% in the non-coaltered subgroup. Compared with patients without coalterations, patients with concurrent CDKN2A/B loss (n = 21) had a shorter median progression-free survival (10.2 versus 34.2 mo, p < 0.001) and overall survival (26.2 versus 80.7 mo, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, co-occurring CDKN2A/B loss was associated with poorer progression-free survival and OS despite the presence of other somatic coalterations, TP53 mutations, BrM, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status., Conclusions: This study confirmed the worse prognostic value, which depicted co-occurring alterations in patients with ALK rearrangement. CDKN2A/B loss was substantially associated with worse outcomes and a higher risk of brain metastases. The evidence presented in our study may help select patients with ALK-positive tumors suitable for treatment escalation and closer brain follow-up., (Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The role of the type, stage and status of cancer in the outcome of COVID-19 remains unclear. Moreover, the characteristic pathological changes of severe COVID-19 reveled by laboratory and radiological findings are similar to those due to the development of cancer itself and antineoplastic therapies. Objective: To identify potential predictors of mortality of COVID-19 in cancer patients. Materials and methods: A retrospective and cross-sectional study was carried out in patients with clinical suspicion of COVID-19 who were confirmed for COVID-19 diagnosis by RT-PCR testing at the National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases between April and December 2020. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and radiological data were analyzed. Statistical analyses included area under the curve and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results: A total of 226 patients had clinical suspicion of COVID-19, the diagnosis was confirmed in 177 (78.3%), and 70/177 (39.5%) died. Age, active cancer, leukocyte count ≥12.8 × 109/L, urea ≥7.4 mmol/L, ferritin ≥1,640, lactate ≥2.0 mmol/L, and lung involvement ≥35% were found to be independent predictors of COVID-19 mortality. Conclusion: Active cancer represents the main prognosis factor of death, while the role of cancer stage and type is unclear. Chest CT is a useful tool in the prognosis of death from COVID-19 in cancer patients. It is a challenge to establish the prognostic utility of laboratory markers as their altered values it could have either oncological or pandemic origins., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Villanueva-Cotrina, Velarde, Rodriguez, Bonilla, Laura, Saavedra, Portillo-Alvarez, Bustamante, Fernandez and Galvez-Nino.)

Background: Despite the advances in the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the access to genetic profiling and target therapies remains a challenge in Latin America, even in countries with a higher rate of targetable mutations. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) treatment in a Peruvian real-world setting., Methods: This is a retrospective study of recurrent or advanced NSCLC EGFR mutated patients diagnosed and treated with anti-EGFR TKI at Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas (INEN) between January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020. The outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)., Results: We identify 613 stage IV or recurrent NSCLC patients who were tested for EGFR mutations and found a pathogenic mutation in 39.5% of patients. Only 51.2% of them received anti-EGFR TKI as institutional treatment. ORR was 58%, after median follow-up of 32 months, the estimated median PFS was 13.9 months (11.1-16.7 months), and the estimated median OS was 21.7 months (18.5-24.9 months). No differences were found in PFS according to line of treatment or brain metastases at diagnosis (p = 0.46 and p = 0.07, respectively), respect to OS there were no differences line of treatment (p = 0.12), significant difference were found in presence of brain metastases (p = 0.006)., Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that erlotinib for advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR-activating mutations is effective even in patients usually excluded from clinical trial, like those previously exposed to one or more lines of chemotherapy or with brain metastases., (© 2022 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Co-occurring genomic alterations identified downstream main oncogenic drivers have become more evident since the introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) analyses at diagnosis and progression. Emerging evidence has stated that co-occurring genomic alterations at diagnosis might represent de novo and primary resistance mechanisms to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in advanced EGFR-mutant (EGFRm) non-small lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we assessed the prognostic role of co-occurring genomic alterations in advanced EGFRm NSCLC., Methods: A cohort of 111 patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR-sensitive mutations detected by PCR was analyzed in 5 Latin American oncological centers from January 2019 to December 2020. All eligible patients received upfront therapy with EGFR-TKI. Co-occurring genomic alterations were determined at diagnosis in every patient by the NGS (FoundationOneCDx) comprehensive platform, which evaluates 324 known cancer-related genes., Results: EGFR exon19 deletion was the most frequent oncogenic driver mutation (60.4 %) detected by NGS. According to the NGS assay, 31 % and 68.3 % of patients had 1-2 and ≥ 3 co-occurring genomic alterations, respectively. The most frequent co-occurring genomic alterations were TP53 mutations (64.9 %) followed by CDKN2AB alterations (13.6 %), BRCA2 (13.6 %), and PTEN (12.7 %) mutations. Baseline central nervous system disease was present in 42.7 % of patients. First- or second-generation EGFR TKIs (gefitinib, afatinib, or erlotinib) were the most common treatment in 67.5 % of patients, while osimertinib was administered in 27.9 % of cases. The median PFS in all evaluated patients was 13.63 months (95 %CI: 11.79-15.52). Using ≥ 3 co-occurring alterations as the cut-off point, patients with ≥ 3 co-occurring genomic alterations showed a median PFS, of 12.7 months (95 %CI: 9.92-15.5) vs 21.3 months (95 %CI: 13.93-NR) in patients with 2 or less co-occurring genomic alterations [HR 3.06, (95 %CI: 1.55-5.48) p = 0.0001]. Also, patients with a TP53 mutation had a shorter PFS, 13.6 (95 %CI: 10.7-15.5) vs 19.2 months (95 %CI: 12.8-NR); in wild type TP53 [HR 2.01 (95 %CI: 1.18-3.74) p = 0.12]. In the multivariate analysis, the number (≥3) of concurrent genomic alterations and ECOG PS of 2 or more were related to a significant risk factor for progression [HR 2.79 (95 %CI: 1.49-5.23) p = 0.001 and HR 2.42 (95 %CI: 1.22-4.80) p = 0.011 respectively]., Conclusion: EGFR-mutant NSCLC is not a single oncogene-driven disease in the majority of cases, harboring a higher number of co-occurring genomic alterations. This study finds the number of co-occurring genomic alterations and the presence of TP53 mutations as negative prognostic biomarkers, which confers potentially earlier resistance mechanisms to target therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Lung cancer in the young is a rare entity of great interest due to the high frequency of targetable mutations. In this study, we explored the genomic landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in young patients and compared it with genetic alterations in older patients., Methods: Comparative study of the genomic profile of NSCLC young (≤40 years old) vs older patients (>40 years old) from Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas (INEN) in Lima, Peru. Archival paraffin-embedded tumor samples were profiled with FoundationOne CDx assay to identify short variants alterations (insertions and deletions), copy number variations (CNV), tumor mutational burden and microsatellite instability in 324 driver genes and rearrangements in 28 commonly rearranged genes. A targetable alteration was defined as any alteration in a driver oncogene for which an FDA approved therapy existed at the time of study enrollment., Results: Overall, 62 tumors were profiled, 32 from young and 30 from older patients. All clinicopathological features (smoking status, clinical stage, and histology) were similar between groups, except for gender (65.6% of females in the younger group vs 40% in the older group, P=0.043). At least one actionable mutation was present in 84.4% and 83.3% in younger and older patients, respectively. Alteration rates in the main genes were: BRAF, 3.1%(n=1) vs 0%; EGFR, 46.9% (n=15) vs 43.3% (n=13); ERBB2, 12.5% (n=4) vs 16.7% (n=5); KRAS, 15.6% (n=5) vs 16.7% (n=5); ALK, 6.3% (n=2) vs 3.3% (n=1); RET, 0.0% vs 3.3% (n=1); ROS1, 3.1% (n=1) vs 3.3% (n=1); NTRK1, 0.0% vs 3.3% (n=1) and MET, 3.1% (n=1) vs 13.3% (n=4). Mean TMB was 4.04 Mut/Mb (SD ± 3.98) for young vs 8.06 Mut/Mb (SD ± 9.84) for older patients (P=0.016). There were not significant differences in CNV, frequency of gene rearrangements, or microsatellites instability., Conclusion: NSCLC in the young in our cohort was characterized by a high frequency of actionable genetic aberrations and a low TMB, which was also true for our older patients. The enrichment of actionable mutations in young patients described in other reports might be attributed to differences in the etiology and clinicopathological characteristics between younger and older patients and therefore not be applicable to all populations., Competing Interests: LR has received grants for research support to Institution from Roche, Pfizer, Genetech, BMS, Lilly, Novartis, Syndax, Liquid Genomics and Astra Zeneca. JAP has received payments for scientific projects development from Roche Peru and a research and travel grant from Foundation Medicine. SJ, SV and ES are employees of Roche Farma, Peru. SSG worked at Roche Peru as RWData/Evidence manager Until July 2021. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Ruiz, Galvez-Nino, Roque, Montes, Nuñez, Raez, Sánchez-Gambetta, Jaúregui, Viale, Smith, Pinto and Mas.)

Background: To assess the correlation of WHO histological classification and Masaoka-Koga staging system of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) with prognosis., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 83 patients with TETs in the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas between 1996 to 2018. We analyzed the clinical stages, histological types and treatment modalities and attempted to determine the impact on overall survival. The data was retrieved from clinical files and reviewed by a pathologist who reclassificated according to the 2004 WHO classification system. The staging was performed with the Masaoka-Koga staging system. Survival curves were constructed with Kaplan-Meir method., Results: There was a total of 83 patients with a median age of 55 years old included in the study. The histological type corresponded to thymoma (T) in 63.8% (n = 53) and to thymic carcinoma (TC) in 36.1%. T were type A, AB, B1, B2 and B3 in 14.4%, 18%, 12%, 3.6%, 7.4% of cases, respectively. The proportion of advanced disease (Masaoka stage III-IV) was high (65%). With a median follow-up of 88.4 months, median overall survival (OS) was 81.6 months for T and 12.3 months for TC (P = 0.01). Univariate analysis showed that sex, histological type, clinical stage and surgery (P = 0.01) were significant independent prognostic factors. On multivariate analysis, histology type and Masaoka-Koga staging had an effect on survival., Conclusions: The results indicates a clear association between the WHO histological classification and Masaoka-Koga staging system with survival. We found a higher proportion of TETs with advanced disease at diagnosis. Further research are required and collaboration is important to foster knowledge focused on classification and treatment., Key Points: SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: The WHO histological classification, the Masaoka-Koga system and surgery treatment were associated with overall survival., What This Study Adds: To determine prognosis factors in TETs., (© 2020 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Introduction: Median age at diagnosis of lung cancer is 70 years. Its presentation in patients 40 or younger is uncommon and it has been proposed that maybe it is a different disease due to its clinical characteristics and genetic makeup. There are a limited number of studies in this population and they report different clinic-pathological characteristics in comparison with older patients., Methods: We described the incidence of lung cancer patients diagnosed at age 40 or younger at the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas (INEN), Lima-Peru; from 2009 to 2017 and evaluated the characteristic of NSCLC. Epidemiologic and clinic-pathological data was collected from clinical files. Analysis was carried out using SPSSvs19 software., Results: We identified 3823 patients with lung cancer seen at INEN during the study period. Among these, 166 (4.3%) patients were 40 years or younger, and 137/166 (82.5%) were NSCLC. Median age at diagnosis was 36 years (range 14-40 years) and 59.1% of patients were female. A smoking history was present in 14.4% of patients. Frequent symptoms at diagnosis were cough (62.0%), chest pain (51.8%) and dyspnea (40.9%). Adenocarcinoma was the most common histological type (63.3%). Most patients had advanced disease at diagnosis (84.7%). The median overall survival was 8.2 months., Conclusions: The proportion of young patients with lung cancer in our population is higher than that reported in the most recent literature. Lung cancer in the young is mostly sporadic, more frequent in women, usually adenocarcinoma type and it presents with advanced disease, resulting in a very poor survival.

Aim: To correlate levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) evaluated using the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group methodology, and both density of tumor-infiltrating immune cell and clinicopathological features in different malignancies. Methods: 209 pathological samples from gastric cancer, cervical cancer (CC), non-small-lung cancer, cutaneous melanoma (CM) and glioblastoma were tested for TIL in hematoxylin eosin, and density of CD3 + , CD4 + , CD8 + , CD20 + , CD68 + and CD163 + cells by digital analysis. Results: TIL levels were higher in invasive margin compartments (IMC). TIL in IMC, intratumoral and stromal compartments predicted survival. CC and gastric cancer had higher TIL in intratumoral; CC and CM had higher TIL in stromal compartment and IMC. CM had the highest density of lymphocyte and macrophage populations. CD20 density was associated with survival in the whole series. Conclusion: Standardized evaluation of TIL levels may provide valuable prognostic information in a spectrum of different malignancies.