Search

Supplementary Data from Trilaciclib Prior to Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Final Efficacy and Subgroup Analysis from a Randomized Phase II Study

Purpose:We report final antitumor efficacy results from a phase II study of trilaciclib, an intravenous cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor, administered prior to gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GCb) in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (NCT02978716).Patients and Methods:Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to group 1 [GCb (days 1, 8); n = 34], group 2 [trilaciclib prior to GCb (days 1, 8); n = 33], or group 3 [trilaciclib (days 1, 8) and trilaciclib prior to GCb (days 2, 9); n = 35]. Subgroup analyses were performed according to CDK4/6 dependence, level of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and RNA-based immune signatures using proportional hazards regression. T-cell receptor (TCR) β CDR3 regions were amplified and sequenced to identify, quantify, and compare the abundance of each unique TCRβ CDR3 at baseline and on treatment.Results:Median overall survival (OS) was 12.6 months in group 1, not reached in group 2 (HR = 0.31; P = 0.0016), 17.8 months in group 3 (HR = 0.40; P = 0.0004), and 19.8 months in groups 2 and 3 combined (HR = 0.37; P < 0.0001). Efficacy outcomes were comparable regardless of cancer CDK4/6 dependence status and immune signatures. Administering trilaciclib prior to GCb prolonged OS irrespective of PD-L1 status but had greater benefit in the PD-L1–positive population. T-cell activation was enhanced in patients receiving trilaciclib.Conclusions:Administering trilaciclib prior to GCb enhanced antitumor efficacy, with significant improvements in OS. Efficacy outcomes in immunologic subgroups and enhancements in T-cell activation suggest these improvements may be mediated via immunologic mechanisms.

Purpose: H3B-6545, a novel Selective ERα Covalent Antagonist (SERCA), inactivates both and wild-type and mutant ERα by targeting cysteine 530 and enforcing antagonist conformation. H3B-6545 demonstrated preclinical high activity in breast cancer models with constitutively active ESR1 mutations (Furman C, SABCS 2020) and clinical activity in pretreated women with ER+ breast cancer (Hamilton EP, ASCO 2021). Patients and Methods: The primary objective of the phase II is to estimate the objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary objectives include safety. Results: 94 pts were treated with 450 mg daily, the recommended phase II dose: 11 in the phase I and 83 in the phase II parts of the trial. Patients and tumor characteristics were presented previously (Hamilton EP, ASCO, 2021). As of March 31, 2021, grade (gr) 2 or higher adverse events (AE) reported in ≥10% were anemia (19%), nausea (17%), fatigue (16%), and diarrhea (12%). Laboratory gr 2 or higher abnormalities reported in ≥10% pts were creatinine clearance decrease (39%), hemoglobin decrease (38%), Lymphocytes decrease (37%), ALT increase (14%), AST increase (13%), bilirubin increase (12%), and creatinine increase (12%). AE of gr 1 sinus bradycardia (asymptomatic) was reported in 35% and gr 2 (symptomatic, no intervention needed) was reported in 5%. Gr 2 and 3 QTcF prolongation were reported in 2 and 3 pts, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. Efficacy estimates are presented in Table 1. CI: Confidence interval. N: total number of pts in full analysis set, used in PFS analysis. n: number of response-evaluable pts, used in ORR and CBR analysis. Efficacy estimates were consistent across the various subgroups. Responses were demonstrated in heavily pretreated pts, pts with visceral metastases, pts with constitutionally active ESR1 Y537S mutations, and in pts who received chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Numerically higher response rate and longer PFS were observed in pts with ESR1 Y537s. Conclusions: H3B-6545 has a manageable safety profile and demonstrated single-agent anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated ER+, HER2- mBC patients. Clinical activity was consistent across the various subgroups. Tumors harboring the constitutionally active ESR1 Y537S mutation may present higher ERα activity, and consequently enrich for luminal A traits and demonstrate greater lineage dependence on ERα. Table 1.Consistency of H3B-6545 activity across the key subgroupsEfficacyClinical CharacteristicORR % (95% CI)CBR % (95% CI)Median PFS mo (95% CI)Overall population (N=94, n=72)16.7 (8.9, 27.3)40.3 (28.9, 52.5)5.1 (3.2, 6.2)Liver and/or lung metastases (N=76, n=62)17.7 (9.2, 29.5)41.9 (29.5, 55.2)5.4 (1.8, 7.2)≥3 prior regimens (N=49, n=39)20.5 (9.3, 36.5)48.7 (32.4, 65.2)5.4 (3.5, 7.3)Prior chemotherapy (N=47, n=35)17.1 (6.6, 33.6)51.4 (34.0, 68.6)5.5 (3.6, 7.3)PgR+ (N=38, n=32)15.6 (5.3, 32.8)50.0 (31.9, 68.1)5.4 (2.0, 8.8)ESR1 clonal Y537S (N=10, n=10)30.0 (6.7, 65.2)60.0 (26.2, 87.8)7.3 (0.8, 11.2)ESR1 clonal D538G (N=19, n=17)0.0 (0.0, 19.5)35.3 (14.2, 61.7)5.4 (1.7, 7.2) Citation Format: Erika P Hamilton, Judy S Wang, Timothy Pluard, Aki Morikawa, E Claire Dees, Robert H Jones, Barbara Haley, Anne Armstrong, Adam L Cohen, Pamela Munster, Gail S Wright, Fadi Kayali, Lisa Cantagallo, Manav Korpal, Jenny Long, Jianjun Xiao, Benoit Destenaves, Lei Gao, Tarek Sahmoud, Antonio Gualberto, Dejan Juric. H3B-6545, a novel selective estrogen receptor covalent antagonist (SERCA), in estrogen receptor positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer - A phase II study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-17-10.

Breast cancer; Cancer Càncer de mama; Càncer Cáncer de mama; Cáncer The METRIC study (NCT#0199733) explored a novel antibody–drug conjugate, glembatumumab vedotin (GV), targeting gpNMB that is overexpressed in ~40% of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and associated with poor prognosis. The study was a randomized, open-label, phase 2b study that evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) of GV compared with capecitabine in gpNMB-overexpressing TNBC. Patients who had previously received anthracycline and taxane-based therapy were randomized 2:1 to receive, GV (1.88 mg/kg IV q21 days) or capecitabine (2500 mg/m2 PO daily d1–14 q21 days). The primary endpoint was RECIST 1.1 PFS per independent, blinded central review. In all, 327 patients were randomized to GV (213 treated) or capecitabine (92 treated). Median PFS was 2.9 months for GV vs. 2.8 months for capecitabine. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities for GV were neutropenia, rash, and leukopenia, and for capecitabine were fatigue, diarrhea, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. The study did not meet the primary endpoint of improved PFS over capecitabine or demonstrate a relative risk/benefit improvement over capecitabine. Funding provided by Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.

Advanced Breast Cancer; Efficacy; Margetuximab Cáncer de mama avanzado; Eficacia; Margetuximab Càncer de mama avançat; Eficàcia; Margetuximab Importance ERRB2 (formerly HER2)–positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) remains typically incurable with optimal treatment undefined in later lines of therapy. The chimeric antibody margetuximab shares ERBB2 specificity with trastuzumab but incorporates an engineered Fc region to increase immune activation. Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of margetuximab vs trastuzumab, each with chemotherapy, in patients with pretreated ERBB2-positive ABC. Design, Setting, and Participants The SOPHIA phase 3 randomized open-label trial of margetuximab plus chemotherapy vs trastuzumab plus chemotherapy enrolled 536 patients from August 26, 2015, to October 10, 2018, at 166 sites in 17 countries. Eligible patients had disease progression on 2 or more prior anti-ERBB2 therapies and 1 to 3 lines of therapy for metastatic disease. Data were analyzed from February 2019 to October 2019. Interventions Investigators selected chemotherapy before 1:1 randomization to margetuximab, 15 mg/kg, or trastuzumab, 6 mg/kg (loading dose, 8 mg/kg), each in 3-week cycles. Stratification factors were metastatic sites (≤2, >2), lines of therapy (≤2, >2), and chemotherapy choice. Main Outcomes and Measures Sequential primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by central blinded analysis and overall survival (OS). All α was allocated to PFS, followed by OS. Secondary end points were investigator-assessed PFS and objective response rate by central blinded analysis. Results A total of 536 patients were randomized to receive margetuximab (n = 266) or trastuzumab (n = 270). The median age was 56 (27-86) years; 266 (100%) women were in the margetuximab group, while 267 (98.9%) women were in the trastuzumab group. Groups were balanced. All but 1 patient had received prior pertuzumab, and 489 (91.2%) had received prior ado-trastuzumab emtansine. Margetuximab improved primary PFS over trastuzumab with 24% relative risk reduction (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98; P = .03; median, 5.8 [95% CI, 5.5-7.0] months vs 4.9 [95% CI, 4.2-5.6] months; October 10, 2018). After the second planned interim analysis of 270 deaths, median OS was 21.6 months with margetuximab vs 19.8 months with trastuzumab (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.69-1.13; P = .33; September 10, 2019), and investigator-assessed PFS showed 29% relative risk reduction favoring margetuximab (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58-0.86; P

Background Trilaciclib is an intravenous (IV) cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor. Preliminary data showed that adding trilaciclib prior to gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GCb) significantly increased overall survival (OS) compared with GCb alone among patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) (Tan et al., Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:1587-1601). Here, final antitumor efficacy results (objective response rate [ORR], progression-free survival [PFS], and OS) are reported for the whole study population, and in cohorts according to CDK4/6 dependence and level of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression. Methods This was a randomized, open-label, phase 2 study of patients with mTNBC who had received ≤2 previous lines of chemotherapy in the recurrent/metastatic setting (NCT02978716). Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive GCb on days 1 and 8 (group 1, n=34), trilaciclib prior to GCb on days 1 and 8 (group 2, n=33), or trilaciclib alone on days 1 and 8 and prior to GCb on days 2 and 9 (group 3, n=35), in 21-day cycles. PFS and OS (prespecified secondary endpoints) were assessed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, and ORR in response-evaluable patients. Patient tumors were characterized as CDK4/6 independent (basal-like) or indeterminate (HER2-enriched, normal-like, luminal A/B) according to the established PAM50 signature, or CDK4/6 dependent (luminal androgen receptor) or indeterminate (basal-like 1/2, mesenchymal) according to the established Lehmann signature. PD-L1 expression was scored as negative or positive if Results Median follow-up was 8.4 months (range: 0.1-25.7) for group 1, 14.0 months (1.3-33.6) for group 2, and 15.3 months (3.5-33.7) for group 3. The ORR among response-evaluable patients was 7/24 (29.2%) in group 1, 15/30 (50.0%) in group 2, and 12/31 (38.7%) in group 3. Median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) in the ITT population was 5.7 (3.3, 9.9) months in group 1, 9.4 (6.1, 11.9) months in group 2, and 7.3 (6.2, 13.9) months in group 3, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.62 (P = 0.2099) and 0.63 (P = 0.1816), for groups 2 and 3 versus group 1, respectively. Overall, 73.5%, 39.4%, and 57.1% of patients in groups 1, 2, and 3 had died. Median OS (95% CI) was 12.6 (6.3, 15.6) months in group 1, not reached (NR) (10.2, NR) in group 2 (HR = 0.31, P = 0.0016), and 17.8 (12.9, 32.7) months in group 3 (HR = 0.40, P = 0.0004). For groups 2 and 3 combined, median OS was 19.8 (14.0, NR) months (HR = 0.37, P Conclusions Mature data from this study confirm that administering trilaciclib prior to GCb enhances antitumor efficacy compared with GCb alone, with statistically significant improvements in OS. Subgroup analyses suggest that adding trilaciclib prior to GCb benefits patients regardless of CDK4/6 dependence status and PD-L1 expression. Additional immune subtyping analyses are ongoing and will be presented. Group 1Group 2Group 3PD-L1 +vePD-L1 –vePD-L1 +vePD-L1 –vePD-L1 +vePD-L1 –vePatients, n171016101616ORR, n (%)4 (23.5)3 (30.0)8 (50.0)4 (40.0)7 (43.8)4 (25.0)Median PFS, months (95% CI)3.5 (2.2, NR)9.5 (5.2, NR)7.9 (4.3, NR)11.9 (8.8, NR)9.0 (6.2, NR)6.9 (6.4, NR)P value (Wald Test)––0.3470.6040.0690.766HR (95% CI)––0.70 (0.3, 1.5)0.76 (0.3, 2.2)0.46 (0.2, 1.1)1.16 (0.4, 3.1)Median OS, months (95% CI)10.5 (6.3, 18.8)13.9 (12.6, NR)20.1 (10.2, NR)NR (9.4, NR)32.7 (15.3, NR)17.8 (12.9, NR)P value (Wald Test)––0.0280.0830.020.239HR (95% CI)––0.35 (0.1, 0.9)0.34 (0.1, 1.2)0.33 (0.1, 0.8)0.57 (0.2, 1.5)HR and P values are for comparisons between group 2 versus group 1, and group 3 versus group 1.+ve, positive; –ve, negative; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; NR, not reached; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; PD-L1, programmed death ligand-1; PFS, progression-free survival. Citation Format: Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Gail S Wright, Anu R Thummala, Michael A Danso, Lazar Popovic, Timothy J Pluard, Hyo S Han, Željko Vojnović, Nikola Vasev, Ling Ma, Donald A Richards, Sharon T Wilks, Dušan Milenković, Jie Xiao, Jessica A Sorrentino, Janet Horton, Antoinette R Tan. Trilaciclib improves overall survival when given with gemcitabine/carboplatin in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: Final analysis of a randomized phase 2 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-06.

To assess safety and efficacy of niraparib + bevacizumab as a first-line maintenance therapy for patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.This multicenter, phase II, single-arm, open-label study enrolled adult patients with stage IIIB to IV ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (NCT03326193). Patients were required to have an attempt at debulking surgery and have a complete response, partial response, or no evidence of disease following first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy with ≥3 cycles of bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 18 months. Secondary endpoints included PFS, overall survival, and safety.Among the 105 evaluable patients, the PFS rate at 18 months was 62% (95% CI 52-71%) in the overall population and 76% (95% CI 61-87) in the homologous recombination deficient (HRd), 47% (95% CI 31-64%) in the HR proficient (HRp), and 56% (95% CI 31-79%) in the HR not determined (HRnd) subgroups (December 24, 2020, cutoff). After a median follow-up time of 28.7 months (IQR, 23.9-32.5 months), median PFS was 19.6 months (95% CI 16.5-25.1) in the overall population (N = 105) and 28.3 months (95% CI 19.9-NE), 14.2 months (95% CI 8.6-16.8), and 12.1 months (95% CI 8.0-NE) in the HRd, HRp, and HRnd subgroups, respectively (June 16, 2021, cutoff). The most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (related to niraparib and/or bevacizumab) were thrombocytopenia (74/105), fatigue (60/105), and anemia (55/105; December 24, 2020, cutoff).Niraparib + bevacizumab first-line maintenance therapy displayed promising PFS results. Safety was consistent with the known safety profiles of niraparib and bevacizumab as monotherapy.

Background: Chemotherapy treatments with robust efficacy that preserve quality of life are needed. Tesetaxel is a novel, oral taxane that has potential advantages over currently available taxanes, including: oral administration with a low pill burden and once every 3 week (Q3W) dosing; no observed hypersensitivity reactions; preclinical evidence of central nervous system (CNS) penetration; and improved activity against chemotherapy-resistant tumors. More than 600 patients have been treated with tesetaxel in clinical studies. Tesetaxel had robust monotherapy activity in a Phase 2 study in 38 patients with HER2-, HR+ MBC, with a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 of 45%. Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that reducing the dose of capecitabine in combination with a taxane may result in reduced toxicity without a reduction in efficacy. CONTESSA 2 investigates tesetaxel plus a reduced dose of capecitabine as an all-oral regimen in taxane-naïve patients with HER2-, HR+ MBC. Trial design: CONTESSA 2 is a 125-patient, multinational, multicenter, single-arm, Phase 2 study of tesetaxel (27 mg/m2 on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle) plus a reduced dose of capecitabine (1,650 mg/m2/day for 14 days of each 21-day cycle) in patients with HER2-, HR+ MBC who have received no more than one chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease and have not previously been treated with a taxane in any setting. Patients with CNS metastases are eligible. The primary endpoint is confirmed ORR assessed by an Independent Radiologic Review Committee (IRC). A sample size of 125 will allow the ORR to be estimated with a maximum standard error of < 5%. Secondary endpoints include duration of response, pharmacokinetics (PK) of tesetaxel and potential for a PK interaction between tesetaxel and capecitabine. Enrollment was initiated in January 2019. For further information on this trial, email joconnell@odonate.com or visit clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03858972). Citation Format: Lee Schwartzberg, Jamil Asselah, Igor Bondarenko, YeeSoo Chae, Noshir DaCosta, Yin-Hsun Feng, Yann Izarzugaza, Julie Lemieux, Mei-Ching Liu, Gavin Marx, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Mafalda Oliveira, Hope Rugo, Andrew Seidman, Gail Wright, Joseph O'Connell, Thomas Wei, Sung-Bae Kim. CONTESSA 2: A multinational, multicenter, phase 2 study of tesetaxel plus a reduced dose of capecitabine in patients with HER2-, HR+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who have not previously received a taxane [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-08-07.

Purpose: We report final antitumor efficacy results from a phase II study of trilaciclib, an intravenous cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor, administered prior to gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GCb) in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (NCT02978716). Patients and Methods: Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to group 1 [GCb (days 1, 8); n = 34], group 2 [trilaciclib prior to GCb (days 1, 8); n = 33], or group 3 [trilaciclib (days 1, 8) and trilaciclib prior to GCb (days 2, 9); n = 35]. Subgroup analyses were performed according to CDK4/6 dependence, level of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and RNA-based immune signatures using proportional hazards regression. T-cell receptor (TCR) β CDR3 regions were amplified and sequenced to identify, quantify, and compare the abundance of each unique TCRβ CDR3 at baseline and on treatment. Results: Median overall survival (OS) was 12.6 months in group 1, not reached in group 2 (HR = 0.31; P = 0.0016), 17.8 months in group 3 (HR = 0.40; P = 0.0004), and 19.8 months in groups 2 and 3 combined (HR = 0.37; P < 0.0001). Efficacy outcomes were comparable regardless of cancer CDK4/6 dependence status and immune signatures. Administering trilaciclib prior to GCb prolonged OS irrespective of PD-L1 status but had greater benefit in the PD-L1–positive population. T-cell activation was enhanced in patients receiving trilaciclib. Conclusions: Administering trilaciclib prior to GCb enhanced antitumor efficacy, with significant improvements in OS. Efficacy outcomes in immunologic subgroups and enhancements in T-cell activation suggest these improvements may be mediated via immunologic mechanisms.

Purpose Androgen receptor (AR) expression occurs in up to 86% of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancers. In vitro, AR inhibitors enhance antitumor activity of trastuzumab, an anti-HER2 antibody, in trastuzumab-resistant HER2+ cell lines. This open-label, single-arm, phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide, an AR-signaling inhibitor, in patients with advanced HER2+ AR+ breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab. Methods Eligible patients had measurable or non-measurable evaluable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status ≤ 1, no history of brain metastases, and previously received ≥ 1 anti-HER2 regimen for advanced disease. Patients received 160 mg oral enzalutamide daily and 6 mg/kg intravenous trastuzumab every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks (CBR24); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Results Overall, 103 women were enrolled [median age 60 years (range 34–83)]; 62% had received ≥ 3 lines of prior anti-HER2 therapy. CBR24, comprising patients with confirmed partial responses (5%) and durable stable disease at 24 weeks (19%), was 24% in the efficacy evaluable set (n = 89). CBR24 did not seem related to AR-expression levels or hormone receptor status. Median PFS was 3.4 months (95% confidence interval 2.0–3.8). Overall, 97 (94%) patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with fatigue most common (34%). Dyspnea (4%) and malignant neoplasm progression (3%) were the only TEAEs grade ≥ 3 reported in ≥ 3 patients. 22 patients (21%) reported serious TEAEs. Four patients (4%) experienced fatal, non-drug-related TEAEs. Conclusions Enzalutamide plus trastuzumab was well tolerated, and a subset of patients in this heavily pretreated population had durable disease control. Determination of biomarkers is needed to identify patients most likely to benefit from this combination. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02091960

1043 Background: Tucatinib (TUC) is an investigational TKI, highly selective for HER2 without significant inhibition of EGFR. HER2CLIMB is a randomized trial of TUC vs placebo in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine in patients (pts) with HER2+ breast cancer (NCT02614794, Murthy NEJM 2019). The most common G ≥3 adverse events (AEs) with higher incidence on the TUC arm (diarrhea, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome [PPE], and elevated liver enzymes) are described herein. Methods: Given that pts on the TUC arm had a longer duration of tx than those on the control arm, time-at-risk exposure-adjusted incidence rates of diarrhea, AST, ALT, and PPE were calculated as the number of pts with an event divided by the total exposure time-at-risk of an initial occurrence of the event among pts in the tx group. Time-to-event analyses were conducted for AST/ALT/bilirubin (in aggregate), diarrhea, and PPE. Results: Diarrhea and elevated AST/ALT/bilirubin on both the TUC and control arms were primarily G1/2 and manageable with dose modifications, and in some cases of diarrhea, with antidiarrheal tx. Median time to diarrhea onset was shorter on the TUC arm compared to control. For AST/ALT/bilirubin and PPE, median time to first onset was Cycles 1 and 2. On the TUC arm, antidiarrheals were used in 49.7% of cycles in which diarrhea was reported (39.8% on the control arm), and when used, the median duration of use on each arm was 3 days per cycle. Prophylactic antidiarrheals were not required per protocol. When adjusted for exposure (time-at-risk exposure-adjusted incidence rate per 100 person-years), the difference in G ≥3 events between tx arms becomes similar for diarrhea and PPE (21 vs 17 and 21 vs 19). The difference in G ≥3 events between arms is reduced for AST and ALT (7 vs 1 and 8 vs 1). Conclusions: TUC with trastuzumab and capecitabine was well-tolerated. Rates of G ≥3 diarrhea and PPE were similar between tx arms. Elevated liver enzymes were higher on the TUC arm, but were transient and reversible. Discontinuation of TUC due to AEs was rare. Clinical trial information: NCT02614794 . [Table: see text]

Background: CTX + dual HER2-targeting monoclonal antibodies (mAb) remains a standard of care for treatment (Tx) of both HER2+ early-stage and MBC. However, when the SOPHIA trial was launched, limited Tx options existed after progression on T, pertuzumab (P), and ado-trastuzumab emtansine. M, an Fc-engineered anti-HER2 mAb, targets the same epitope as T and exerts similar antiproliferative effects. M enhances CD16A-mediated ADCC compared to T. Furthermore, M treatment is associated with increased HER2-specific T- and B-cell responses and increased T-cell clonality compared to baseline. The phase 3 SOPHIA (NCT02492711) study demonstrated PFS benefit of M vs T, both + CTX, in HER2+ MBC pts. M improved PFS over T, with a 24% relative risk reduction (HR .76; 95% CI .59-.98; P=.033; median, 5.8 [95% CI 5.5-7.0] months (mo) vs 4.9 [95% CI 4.2-5.6] mo (Rugo HS, et al. JAMA Oncol 2021), resulting in FDA approval. Median OS after 270 mortality events (2nd interim analysis) was 21.6 mo with M vs 19.8 mo with T (HR .89; 95% CI .69-1.13; P=.33). Here we report final OS after 385 events, as well as updated safety.Methods: Pts with disease progression after ≥2 lines of anti-HER2 Tx, including P, and 1-3 lines of Tx for HER2+ MBC were randomized 1:1 to CTX + either M (15 mg/kg) or T (8 mg/kg loading dose, then 6 mg/kg), both given IV every 3 weeks. Randomization was stratified by number of metastatic sites (≤2, >2), lines of Tx for MBC (≤2, >2), and CTX choice (capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine). Sequential primary end points were central-blinded review of PFS and OS.Results: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population comprised 536 pts (M, 266; T, 270). At the median follow-up of 20.2 mo among all ITT pts, pts received a median of 7 cycles of M + CTX vs 6 cycles of T + CTX. Median OS after 385 events in the ITT population was 21.6 mo with M vs 21.9 mo with T (HR .95; 95% CI .77-1.17; P=.62; Table). Based on a prespecified, non-α-allocated exploratory analysis, a numerical OS advantage in favor of the M arm was observed in the subgroup of pts homozygous for the CD16A-158F low-affinity allele (median OS, 23.6 vs 19.2 mo; HR .72; 95% CI .52-1.00; nominal P=.05). In contrast, in the small subgroup of CD16A-158V homozygotes, median OS was longer for T vs M (31.1 mo vs 22.0 mo; HR 1.77; 95% CI 1.01-3.12; nominal P=.04). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AE) occurred in 146 pts (55.3%) receiving M vs 141 pts (53.0%) receiving T. Serious AEs were seen in 47 pts (17.8%) receiving M vs 51 pts (19.2%) receiving T. Incidence of infusion-related reactions was higher with M (36 [13.6%]) vs T (9 [3.4%]). Left ventricular dysfunction requiring delay or cessation of M/T administration occurred in 4 pts (1.5%) receiving M and in 7 pts (2.6%) receiving T. Conclusions: The median OS in the ITT population was not statistically different between the 2 arms. An exploratory analysis of CD16A genotyping indicates a numerical OS advantage in favor of M in F homozygous pts, along with a numerical OS advantage in favor of T in V homozygous pts. Safety of M + CTX was similar to previous reports and consistent with M FDA-approved label. Studies of M in HER2+ breast cancer pts with different CD16A allelic variants are warranted, including MARGOT, the neoadjuvant investigator-initiated study on the efficacy of M vs T in pts carrying F-allelic variants of CD16A. Median OSITT analysisPrespecified, non-α-allocated exploratory analysis (n=506)N=536CD16A-158F carriers (F/F and F/V)(n=437)CD16A-158F homozygotes (F/F)(n=192)CD16A-158F/V heterozygotes(n=245)CD16A-158V homozygotes (V/V)(n=69)aM + CTX, mo21.6 (n=266)23.3 (n=221)23.6 (n=102)21.3 (n=119)22.0 (n=37)T + CTX, mo21.9 (n=270)20.8 (n=216)19.2 (n=90)22.0 (n=126)31.1 (n=32)HR (95% CI)0.95 (0.77-1.17)0.86 (0.69-1.08)0.72 (0.52-1.00)0.96 (0.71-1.30)1.77 (1.01-3.12)P value0.620.19b0.05b0.78b0.04bAbbreviations: CTX, chemotherapy; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intent to treat; M, margetuximab; mo, months; OS, overall survival; T, trastuzumab. Cutoff date: June 14, 2021. aThis subgroup was characterized by an imbalance in poor prognostic features. bNominal P value. Citation Format: Hope Rugo, Seock-Ah Im, Fatima Cardoso, Javier Cortes, Giuseppe Curigliano, Antonino Musolino, Mark D. Pegram, Thomas Bachelot, Gail S. Wright, Cristina Saura, Santiago Escrivá-de-Romaní, Michelino De Laurentiis, Gary N. Schwartz, Timothy Pluard, Francesco Ricci, William Gwin, III, Christelle Levy, Ursa Brown-Glaberman, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Maaike de Boer, Sung-Bae Kim, Katarína Petráková, Denise A. Yardley, Orit Freedman, Erik H. Jakobsen, Einav Nili Gal-Yam, Rinat Yerushalmi, Peter A. Fasching, Emily Ashley, Shengyan Hong, Minori Rosales, William J. Gradishar. Phase 3 SOPHIA study of margetuximab (M) + chemotherapy (CTX) vs trastuzumab (T) + CTX in patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after prior anti-HER2 therapies: Final overall survival (OS) analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD8-01.

This abstract was not presented at the symposium.

Objectives: Niraparib improves progression-free survival (PFS) in newly diagnosed, recurrent, and heavily pretreated ovarian cancer (OC) in patients (pts) after platinum-based chemotherapy in all biomarker-defined subgroups. Bevacizumab-induced hypoxia can drive genomic instability by altering DNA damage repair pathways, including homologous recombination (HR), and it is hypothesized to sensitize tumors to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. OVARIO (NCT03326193) is a single-arm, open-label study evaluating niraparib + bevacizumab treatment in advanced OC after response to first-line (1L) platinum-based chemotherapy + bevacizumab. Methods: All pts with newly diagnosed high-grade serous or endometrioid stage IIIB-IV OC who had a complete response (CR), partial response, or no evidence of disease (NED) after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy + bevacizumab were eligible. Pts receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) or primary debulking surgery were eligible. All pts underwent tissue testing for HR deficiency (HRd) or proficiency (HRp) at enrollment. Bevacizumab dosage was 15 mg/kg q3w up to 22 cycles, including time on 1L chemotherapy. Niraparib, 300 or 200 mg qd, based on baseline body weight and platelet count, was started within 12 weeks of completing 1L treatment and continued for 3 years or until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was PFS rate at 18 months from treatment initiation of niraparib + bevacizumab maintenance. Results: The study completed enrollment at 105 pts. Most pts were stage III (79%), had serous histology (95%), received NACT (63%), and had CR/NED at the completion of 1L (63%). Overall, 47% of pts were HRd, including HRd-BRCA mutated and HRd-BRCA wild-type. The niraparib starting dose was 200 mg in 78% of pts. At 6 and 12 months, PFS rates were 90% and 75%, respectively. At 12 months, the most common grade ≥3 related treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia, anemia, and hypertension (49% of pts had pre-existing hypertension). Further safety data and PFS rates at 18 months will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Safety of the niraparib + bevacizumab combination was consistent with the known side effects of each drug as monotherapy, and the preliminary data suggest that the combination is efficacious. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03326193

Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeting monoclonal antibodies (mAb) are the standard of care in early-to-advanced HER2+ breast cancer. However, for relapsed/refractory disease, limited options exist after progression on trastuzumab (T), pertuzumab (P), and ado-trastuzumab emtansine. Margetuximab (M) is an Fc-engineered anti-HER2 mAb that targets the same epitope as T and exerts similar antiproliferative effects. Compared with T, M has higher affinity for both 158V (high binding) and 158F (low binding) alleles of the activating Fc receptor, CD16A. M enhances innate immunity, including CD16A-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, more effectively than T. M also potentiates adaptive immunity in treated patients (pts), including enhanced clonality of the T-cell repertoire and induction of HER2-specific T- and B-cell responses. SOPHIA (NCT02492711) is a phase 3 trial that demonstrated the benefit of M vs T, both with chemotherapy, in pts with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This trial is the first prospective analysis of the effect of CD16A genotype on anti-HER2 antibody efficacy. Methods: Pts with disease progression after at least 2 lines of anti-HER2 therapy, including P, and 1-3 lines of therapy for HER2+ MBC were randomized 1:1 to chemotherapy + either M (15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 wk) or T. Randomization was stratified by number of metastatic sites (≤2, >2), lines of treatment for MBC (≤2, >2), and chemotherapy choice (capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine). Primary endpoints were central-blinded review of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The first interim OS analysis at time of PFS analysis (October 10, 2018) was immature, with 158 of 385 deaths (41%) needed for final OS analysis. The stopping boundary was not crossed. A second interim OS analysis was planned after 270 deaths and will be reported here. Results: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population comprised 536 pts (M, 266; H, 270). M + chemotherapy prolonged PFS vs T + chemotherapy (median PFS, 5.8 vs 4.9 mo; hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.98; P=0.033). Results were more pronounced in pts with CD16A genotypes containing a 158F allele (median PFS, 6.9 vs 5.1 mo; HR, 0.68; 95% CI: 0.52-0.90; nominal P=0.005). OS at the first interim analysis demonstrated a HR (95% CI) of 0.95 (0.69-1.31) for the ITT population (n=536) and an HR of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.58-1.17) for the CD16A/FF or FV genotype population (n=457). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 138 pts (52%) receiving M vs 128 pts (48%) receiving T. Serious AEs were seen in 39 (15%) receiving M vs 46 (17%) receiving T. The second planned interim analysis of OS (at n=270), as well as updated safety, will be presented. Conclusions: M + chemotherapy in pts with treated HER2+ MBC improves PFS vs T. Safety was comparable. CD16A genotyping suggests a greater benefit in pts with a 158F allele. Maturing data comparing the OS of pts treated with M vs T with chemotherapy will provide important new insights in characterizing clinical activity of this regimen in pts with MBC. Citation Format: Hope S. Rugo, Seock-Ah Im, Fatima Cardoso, Javier Cortes, Giuseppe Curigliano, Mark D. Pegram, Antonino Musolino, Thomas Bachelot, Gail S. Wright, Michelino De Laurentiis, Peter A. Kaufman, Timothy Pluard, Francesco Ricci, Lupe G. Salazar, Denise A. Yardley, Sutton Edlich, Shengyan Hong, Edwin Rock, William J. Gradishar, SOPHIA Study Group. Phase 3 SOPHIA study of margetuximab + chemotherapy vs trastuzumab + chemotherapy in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer after prior anti-HER2 therapies: second interim overall survival analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-02.

Summary Background Trilaciclib is an intravenous cell-cycle inhibitor that transiently maintains immune cells and haemopoietic stem and progenitor cells in G1 arrest. By protecting the immune cells and bone marrow from chemotherapy-induced damage, trilaciclib has the potential to optimise antitumour activity while minimising myelotoxicity. We report safety and activity data for trilaciclib plus gemcitabine and carboplatin chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Methods In this randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with evaluable, biopsy-confirmed, locally recurrent or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who had no more than two previous lines of chemotherapy were recruited from 26 sites in the USA, three in Serbia, two in North Macedonia, one in Croatia, and one in Bulgaria; sites were academic and community hospitals. Availability of diagnostic samples of tumour tissue confirming triple-negative breast cancer was a prerequisite for enrolment. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by an interactive web-response system, stratified by number of previous lines of systemic therapy and the presence of liver metastases, to receive intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and intravenous carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve 2 μg × h/mL) on days 1 and 8 (group 1), gemcitabine and carboplatin plus intravenous trilaciclib 240 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 (group 2), or gemcitabine and carboplatin on days 2 and 9 plus trilaciclib on days 1, 2, 8, and 9 (group 3) of 21-day cycles. Patients continued treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation by the investigator. The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of combining trilaciclib with gemcitabine and carboplatin chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were duration of severe neutropenia during cycle 1 and the occurrence of severe neutropenia during the treatment period. Overall survival was included as a key secondary endpoint. Analyses were in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with EudraCT, 2016-004466-26, and ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02978716 , and is ongoing but closed to accrual. Findings Between Feb 7, 2017, and May 15, 2018, 142 patients were assessed for eligibility and 102 were randomly assigned to group 1 (n=34), group 2 (n=33), or group 3 (n=35). Of all patients, 38 (37%) had received one or two lines of previous chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Median follow-up was 8·4 months (IQR 3·8–13·6) for group 1, 12·7 months (5·5–17·4) for group 2, and 12·9 months (6·7–16·8) for group 3. Data cutoff for myelosuppression endpoints was July 30, 2018, and for antitumour activity endpoints was May 17, 2019. During cycle 1, mean duration of severe neutropenia was 0·8 day (SD 2·4) in group 1, 1·5 days (3·5) in group 2, and 1·0 day (2·6) in group 3 (group 3 vs group 1 one-sided adjusted p=0·70). Severe neutropenia occurred in nine (26%) of 34 patients in group 1, 12 (36%) of 33 patients in group 2, and eight (23%) of 35 patients in group 3 (p=0·70). Overall survival was 12·6 months (IQR 5·8–15·6) in group 1, 20·1 months (9·4–not reached) in group 2, and 17·8 months (8·8–not reached) in group 3 (group 3 vs group 1 two-sided p=0·0023). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were anaemia (22 [73%] of 34), neutropenia (21 [70%]), and thrombocytopenia (18 [60%]) in group 1; neutropenia (27 [82%] of 33), thrombocytopenia (18 [55%]) and anaemia (17 [52%]) in group 2; and neutropenia (23 [66%] of 35), thrombocytopenia (22 [63%]), and nausea (17 [49%]) in group 3. There were no treatment-related deaths. Interpretation No significant differences were observed in myelosuppression endpoints with trilaciclib plus gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer; however, the regimen was generally well tolerated and overall survival results were encouraging. Further studies of trilaciclib in this setting are warranted. Funding G1 Therapeutics.

Background: Eribulin mesylate (Er) is a non-taxane inhibitor of microtubule growth that results in G2-M cell cycle arrest, disruption of normal mitotic spindles and apoptosis. Er demonstrated an overall survival (OS) but not progression free survival (PFS) advantage in anthracycline and taxane refractory breast cancer pts. This OS rather than PFS benefit has been attributed to Er's potential to suppress new metastases through its effects on the epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) pathway, even in the absence of an effect on the primary tumor or established metastases. In this study ErC was compared to TC, a standard regimen for (neo) adjuvant treatment. A companion exploratory analysis examined the EMT markers E-cadherin and vimentin, as well as the endothelial marker CD-31 assessing tumor vasculature. Final assessments of the primary endpoint of pathological complete response (pCR) and results of the correlative studies will be presented. Methods: Women with histologically confirmed invasive HER2-negative (IHC 0-1+ or FISH/SISH negative), cT1-3, cN0-2, M0 (pN3a disease allowed) adenocarcinoma of the breast were eligible. Following a 10 pt lead-in to confirm the safety/feasibility of ErC, pts were randomized 2:1. Arm 1, Er 1.4 mg/m2 IV (Days 1 & 8) and C 600 mg/m2 IV (Day 1); Arm 2, T 75 mg/m2 IV and C 600 mg/m2 IV on Day 1, both regimens administered q 21 days x 6 cycles followed by surgery. Tumor samples were collected at baseline and from residual breast cancer at the time of surgery. Samples were assayed for E-cadherin, vimentin, and CD-31 expression by immunohistochemistry. Results: Enrollment was completed 4/2014 (76 pts); 10 pts in lead-in phase, 66 pts were randomized (Arm 1, 44; Arm 2, 22). In the randomized population, 77% had invasive ductal adenocarcinoma; median tumor size 3.1 cm (range, 0.4-10cm; 29.5% were T3); axillary nodes clinically positive in 52%. 34% of pts were triple negative (TN). 59 pts (89%) underwent surgery after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on study. pCR rates were 9% and 18% on the TC and ErC arms respectively. 4/7 pts with pCR on the ErC arm were TN. tumor samples were analyzed from 69 pts (including lead-in pts) for expression of the EMT biomarkers. Of these, 40 pts had paired pre- and post-treatment samples, and 29 pts had either a pre- or post-treatment sample (including 8 pre-treatment samples from pts who achieved pCR). In pre-treatment tumor specimens (61 samples), E-cadherin levels were modest-high in 80%, vimentin expression was seen in 39%, and CD-31 expression observed in 21% of the samples. Analysis of pre- and post-treatment paired specimens and differential effects according to treatment regimen will be presented. Conclusion: The observed pCR rate of 18% with ErC in this HER2- pt population was comparable with other NAC regimens. Correlative evaluation of EMT markers and tumor vascular density with response is ongoing and will be presented. Citation Format: Yardley DA, Chandra P, Hart L, Wright GS, Ward P, Mani A, Shastry M, Finney L, Guo S, DeBusk LM, Hainsworth JD, Burris III HA. A phase II randomized study with eribulin/cyclophosphamide (ErC) and docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC) as neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-negative breast cancer- Final analysis of primary endpoint and correlative analysis results. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-06.

1040 Background: Despite advances, pretreated HER2+ MBC remains incurable with ongoing need for new therapies. Investigational M has similar HER2 binding and antiproliferative effects as T. Relative to T, M Fc engineering increases binding affinity for both variants of activating Fc receptor (FcR) CD16A and decreases affinity for inhibitory FcR CD32B, coordinately activating innate and adaptive immunity. In a Phase 3 (P3) trial, M prolonged PFS over T (Table). Second interim OS results from Sept 2019 also favor M (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI 0.69–1.13; nominal P=0.326). Methods: SOPHIA (NCT02492711), an open-label P3 trial, enrolled pts with HER2+ MBC after pertuzumab and 1–3 lines of prior treatment (Tx) for MBC. Randomization was 1:1 to M (15 mg/kg IV q3w + Ctx) or T (6 [8 for loading dose] mg/kg IV q3w + Ctx), stratified by met sites (≤2, >2), lines of Tx for met disease (≤2, >2), and Ctx choice, including capecitabine (Cap), eribulin (Eri), gemcitabine (Gem), or vinorelbine (Vin). Primary endpoints were central blinded PFS and OS, assessed sequentially using the stratified log-rank test. Results: Investigator chemotherapy choices and results by chemotherapy are shown in the table. Subjects receiving Eri and Gem had the lowest PFS hazards ratios (HRs), favoring M over T, although no statistical significance of individual chemotherapy subgroups was seen. There was variable toxicity among Ctx subgroups, and fewer subjects receiving Cap had Ctx related Grade 3 or higher (>=Gr 3) AEs. In this unblinded study, more subjects on M than T in all subgroups discontinued Ctx while continuing study antibody. Conclusions: In combination with chemotherapy in pretreated HER2+ MBC, M improved PFS over T. Safety was manageable in all Ctx subgroups. Differences among HRs for chemotherapy subgroups may be driven by selection bias and/or sensitivity differences. Clinical trial information: NCT02492711 . [Table: see text]

The Janus-associated kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway is a key regulator of inflammatory signaling, associated with tumorigenesis, cell survival, and progression. This randomized phase 2 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of the addition of ruxolitinib, a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, to capecitabine in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer and high systemic inflammation (modified Glasgow Prognostic Score [mGPS] ≥ 1). Patients with ≤ 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for advanced or metastatic disease or hormone receptor-positive patients with disease progression on prior hormonal therapies were randomized 1:1 to 21-day cycles of ruxolitinib (n = 76) or placebo (n = 73) plus capecitabine. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. For ruxolitinib plus capecitabine versus placebo plus capecitabine, median OS was 11.2 months versus 10.9 months (log-rank test P = 0.762); median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.5 months versus 2.5 months (log-rank test P = 0.151); and overall response rate (ORR) was 28.9% versus 13.7% (Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test P = 0.024), respectively. A more favorable change in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was observed with ruxolitinib plus capecitabine versus placebo plus capecitabine. Both regimens were generally tolerable. A higher incidence of grade 3/4 anemia (25.4% vs 5.6%) and a lower incidence of grade 3/4 palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia (1.4% vs 12.7%) occurred with ruxolitinib plus capecitabine versus placebo plus capecitabine. The addition of ruxolitinib to capecitabine for patients with advanced breast cancer and high systemic inflammation was generally tolerable; ORR was numerically greater, a more favorable change in HRQoL was observed, but neither OS nor PFS was improved compared with placebo plus capecitabine.

Background Trilaciclib (T) is an IV cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor and first-in-class myelopreservation agent. Previous results from this phase II trial demonstrated that adding T to GC in mTNBC resulted in: 1) a longer duration and higher administered total dose of chemotherapy, 2) higher response rates and longer PFS, and 3) reduction in the frequency of some myelosuppression events. We now report preliminary OS and updated PFS.TableLBA22TableGroup 1 GC D1, 8 n=34Group 2 Trilaciclib + GC D1, 8 n=33Group 3 Trilaciclib D1, 2, 8, 9 + GC D2, 9 n=35Group 2 + Group 3 n=68Progression-free survival (PFS)Patients with events [n (%)]18 (52.9%)19 (57.6%)18 (51.4%)37 (54.4%)Median PFS (95% CI) [months]5.7 (3.4, 9.2)9.4 (6.1, 13.0)7.3 (6.2, 12.9)8.8 (6.4, 10.9)HR0.600.590.59p-value0.12560.11670.0628Overall survival (OS)Patients with death [n (%)]19 (55.9%)11 (33.3%)14 (40.0%)25 (36.8%)Median OS (95% CI) [months]12.6 (6.3, 15.6)20.1 (10.2, NE)17.8 (12.9, NE)20.1 (15.3, NE)HR0.370.390.40p-value0.04110.00440.0032 Methods This randomized, phase II, open-label study enrolled mTNBC patients with 0-2 prior chemotherapy regimens for recurrent/metastatic disease. Patients were randomized to GC alone on day 1, 8 (Group 1) or T + GC (Group 2) or T + GC (Group 3) using an alternative schedule (T D1, 2, 8, 9 + GC D2, 9) every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was reduction in GC-related neutropenia. PFS and OS were secondary endpoints. Results Among 102 enrolled patients, 98 were treated. 52% had ECOG PS 0 and 37.3% received prior chemotherapy for mTNBC. Median follow-up is 10.5 months; 3 patients remain on treatment. There have been no SAEs related to T. Drug exposure in Group 2/3 patients receiving T (median 168 days, 8 cycles) is longer than with GC alone (median 101 days, 4 cycles). PFS and OS in the intent to treat (ITT) population are summarized in the table below. Groups 2+3 (receiving T) had longer PFS compared with GC alone, HR of 0.59, p=0.0628, and OS was statistically improved with HR of 0.37 and 0.39 in Groups 2 and 3, p=0.0411 and p=0.0044, respectively. ORR were 36.7%, 50.0%, and 33.3% in Groups 3, 2, and 1, respectively. Conclusions The addition of T to GC resulted in a significant increase in OS in both T groups. Previously observed PFS benefit with T was also confirmed. Clinical trial identification NCT02978716. Legal entity responsible for the study G1 Therapeutics, Inc. Funding G1 Therapeutics, Inc. Disclosure J. O'Shaughnessy: Honoraria (self): AbbVie Inc; Honoraria (self): Agendia; Honoraria (self): Amgen Biotechnology; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self): Celgene Croporation; Honoraria (self): Eisai; Honoraria (self): Genentech; Honoraria (self): Genomic Health; Honoraria (self): GRAIL; Honoraria (self): Immunomedics; Honoraria (self): Heron Therapeutics; Honoraria (self): Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals; Honoraria (self): Jounce Therapeutics; Honoraria (self): Lilly; Honoraria (self): Merck; Honoraria (self): Myriad; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Ondonate Therapeutics; Honoraria (self): Pfizer. G.S. Wright: Honoraria (self): Total Health Conferencing; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche Holdings Ltd; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Odonate Therapeutics; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Puma Biotech; Research grant / Funding (institution), Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Macrogenics ; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: AbbVie; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Incyte; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Janssen; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Boehringer Ingelheim; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Medivation; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Merrimack; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Tesaro; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Pfizer. A. Thummala: Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada. H.S. Han: Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Tesaro; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: TapImmune; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Seattle Genetics; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: BMS Prescient; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Horizon; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Karyopharm. S. Wilks: Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: US Oncology. J.A. Sorrentino: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: G1 Therapeutics. Z. Yang: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: G1 Therapeutics. J.K. Horton: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: G1 Therapeutics; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Varian Medical Systems; Honoraria (self): Qfix; Leadership role: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics; Leadership role: American Board of Radiology; Leadership role: ASTRO. A.R. Tan: Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy: Immunomedics; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (self): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: G1 Therapeutics; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution), PI does not receive direct research funding; institution received payment for conduct of trials: Tesaro; Leadership role, Breast Cancer Leader: Caris Precision Oncology Alliance. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

1000 Background: Pretreated HER2+ MBC lacks a defined standard of care, although T is commonly used. M has similar HER2 binding and antiproliferative effects as T. By contrast, M’s Fc region is engineered to increase affinity for both alleles of the activating Fc receptor (FcR), CD16A, and decrease affinity for the inhibitory FcR, CD32B. The low affinity CD16A-158F allele (~85% of population) has been associated with diminished clinical response to T. In a Phase 1 trial, M demonstrated acceptable safety, anti-tumor activity, and evidence of HER2-specific antibody and T-cell responses. Methods: SOPHIA (NCT02492711), a randomized, open-label P3 trial, enrolled pts with HER2+ MBC after pertuzumab and 1–3 lines of prior Tx for MBC. Pts were randomized 1:1 to M (15 mg/kg IV q3w + C) or T (6 [8 for loading dose] mg/kg IV q3w + C), stratified by met sites (≤2, > 2), lines of Tx for met disease (≤2, > 2), and C choice (standard dose capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine). Primary endpoints are central blinded PFS and OS, assessed sequentially using the stratified log-rank test. Objective response rate (ORR) was a secondary endpoint. 257 PFS events were required to provide 90% power to show PFS superiority at 2-sided α = 0.05. Results: Intent-to-treat analysis (536 pts: M 266; T 270) occurred after 265 PFS events. M prolonged PFS over T (median 5.8 vs 4.9 mo, hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59–0.98; P= 0.033). Treatment effects were more pronounced in pts with CD16A genotypes containing a 158F allele (median PFS 6.9 vs 5.1 mo, HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52–0.90; P= 0.005). In 524 pts with baseline measurable disease (M 262; T 262), ORR was higher with M (22%; 95% CI, 17.3-27.7%) vs T (16%; 95% CI 11.8-21.0%). Safety profiles were comparable in 529 pts who received study therapy. Grade ≥3 AEs and serious AEs occurred in 138 (52%) and 39 (15%) vs 128 (48%) and 46 (17%) pts on M vs T, respectively. PFS data cutoff: 10/10/18. Conclusions: In combination with chemotherapy in pretreated HER2+ MBC, M improves PFS over T with comparable safety. CD16A genotyping suggests a differential benefit in patients with a 158F allele. OS data are maturing. Clinical trial information: NCT02492711.

Purpose Selenium has been reported to have chemopreventive benefits in lung cancer. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the incidence of second primary tumors (SPTs) in patients with resected non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving selenium supplementation. Patients and Methods Patients with completely resected stage I NSCLC were randomly assigned to take selenized yeast 200 μg versus placebo daily for 48 months. Participation was 6 to 36 months postoperatively and required a negative mediastinal node biopsy, no excessive vitamin intake, normal liver function, negative chest x-ray, and no other evidence of recurrence. Results The first interim analysis in October 2009, with 46% of the projected end points accumulated, showed a trend in favor of the placebo group with a low likelihood that the trial would become positive; thus, the study was stopped. One thousand seven hundred seventy-two participants were enrolled, with 1,561 patients randomly assigned. Analysis was updated in June 2011 with the maturation of 54% of the planned end points. Two hundred fifty-two SPTs (from 224 patients) developed, of which 98 (from 97 patients) were lung cancer (38.9%). Lung and overall SPT incidence were 1.62 and 3.54 per 100 person-years, respectively, for selenium versus 1.30 and 3.39 per 100 person-years, respectively, for placebo (P = .294). Five-year disease-free survival was 74.4% for selenium recipients versus 79.6% for placebo recipients. Grade 1 to 2 toxicity occurred in 31% of selenium recipients and 26% of placebo recipients, and grade ≥ 3 toxicity occurred in less than 2% of selenium recipients versus 3% of placebo recipients. Compliance was excellent. No increase in diabetes mellitus or skin cancer was detected. Conclusion Selenium was safe but conferred no benefit over placebo in the prevention of SPT in patients with resected NSCLC.

Background: Combining endocrine therapy (ET) with a cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) over ET alone in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC). However, optimal management of disease that progresses on this therapy is not established. In Phase 1 of the TRINITI-1 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02732119), continuous ribociclib 300 mg/d + everolimus (EVE) 2.5 mg/d + exemestane (EXE) 25 mg/d, the recommended Phase 2 dose, resulted in 1 dose-limiting toxicity. Clinical benefit at week 24 was found in 3 of 6 patients whose disease had progressed on a CDK4/6 inhibitor. Here we report Phase 2 efficacy and safety in patients whose disease progressed on a CDK4/6 inhibitor. Methods: Men and postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− ABC whose disease progressed on ≤3 lines of therapy for ABC (1-3 lines of ET and ≤1 line of chemotherapy) and had measurable disease and/or lytic/mixed bone lesions were eligible. Progression on 1 CDK4/6 inhibitor, as the last therapy before enrollment, after ≥4 months of treatment for ABC was required. Dexamethasone mouthwash was required for the first 8 weeks. The primary objective of clinical benefit at 24 weeks in Phase 2 would be met if ≥9 of 42 patients had clinical benefit at 24 weeks. Secondary objectives included PFS, tumor response, safety, and tolerability. Results: Of 46 enrolled patients, 44 were evaluable; among 42 evaluable for efficacy, 6 had prior chemotherapy, 13 had ≥2 prior lines of therapy (median, 1 line), and 13 were on therapy on December 15, 2017. At week 24, 17 patients (40.5%) had clinical benefit by local assessment; the overall response rate was 7.1% (n=3; all had partial response at week 24). Median PFS was 8.8 months (95% CI, 1.9 months-not evaluable). In the safety set (n=44), there was 1 on-treatment death unrelated to study drug; 1 patient discontinued with Grade 4 hypophosphatemia. Common (≥25%) any-grade adverse events were neutropenia (68.2%), stomatitis (45.5%), fatigue (38.6%), nausea (34.1%), thrombocytopenia (34.1%), diarrhea (29.5%), and anemia (25.0%). Seven patients (15.9%) had Grade 1/2 pneumonitis, 23 (52.3%) had Grade 3/4 neutropenia, 2 (4.5%) had Grade 3/4 increased aspartate aminotransferase, and 1 (2.3%) had Grade 3/4 increased alanine aminotransferase. Febrile neutropenia, Grade 3/4 stomatitis or pneumonitis, and corrected QT interval (Fridericia's formula) >480 ms were not observed. Conclusion: TRINITI-1 is the first trial to demonstrate promising clinical benefit and tolerability of continuous ribociclib 300 mg/d, EVE 2.5 mg/d, and EXE 25 mg/d following progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor, warranting further evaluation of this combination. Citation Format: Stacy Moulder, Megan Karuturi, Denise A. Yardley, Gail Shaw Wright, Sara Hurvitz, Rebecca Moroose, Tara Sanft, Cynthia Ma, Amelia Zelnak, Angela DeMichele, Amy Clark, Das Purkayastha, Alisha Khullar, Nicola Caria, Aditya Bardia. Ribociclib in combination with everolimus and exemestane in men and postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer after progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor: Efficacy and safety results from phase II of the TRINITI-1 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT107.

Purpose We evaluated the efficacy of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a performance status (PS) of 2 and assessed if tumoral RRM1 and ERCC1 protein levels are predictive of response to therapy. Patients and Methods A randomized phase III trial was conducted in community-based oncology practices. Tumor specimens were collected a priori and shipped to a single laboratory for blinded determination of in situ RRM1 and ERCC1 protein expression levels by an automated quantitative immunofluorescent-based technology. Results One hundred seventy patients were randomly assigned. Overall median survival was 5.1 months for gemcitabine and 6.7 months for gemcitabine and carboplatin (P = .24). RRM1 (range, 5.3 to 105.6; median, 34.1) and ERCC1 (range, 5.2 to 131.3; median, 34.7) values were significantly and inversely correlated with disease response (r = −0.41; P = .001 for RRM1; r = −0.39; P = .003 for ERCC1; ie, response was better for patients with low levels of expression). A model for response prediction that included RRM1, ERCC1, and treatment arm, was highly predictive of the treatment response observed (P = .0005). We did not find statistically significant associations between survival and RRM1 or ERCC1 levels. Conclusion Single-agent chemotherapy remains the standard of care for patients with advanced NSCLC and poor PS. Quantitative analysis of RRM1 and ERCC1 protein expression in routinely collected tumor specimens in community oncology practices is predictive of response to gemcitabine and gemcitabine and carboplatin therapy. Oncologists should consider including in situ expression analysis for these proteins into their therapeutic decisions.

TPS1106 Background: Treatment of mTNBC is an unmet clinical need. First-line nab-P with gem or carbo/bevacizumab has demonstrated efficacy and safety in female patients (pts) with mTNBC. nab-P sign...

1006 Background: Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-P) 260 mg/m2 is superior to paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (P) every 3 weeks (Gradishar et al., J Clin Oncol. 2005). Weekly uninterrupted P is more effective than q3wk P in MBC (Seidman et al., J Clin Oncol. 2008). Bevacizumab (bev) nearly doubles response rate and time to progression (TTP) when added to P as 1st line therapy for MBC (Miller et al., N Engl J Med. 2007). Methods: This open-label, phase II study randomized patients (pts) to nab-P at 260 mg/m2 q3wk (arm A) versus 260 mg/m2 q2wk with filgrastim (arm B) versus 130 mg/m2 weekly uninterrupted, all with bev (15 mg/kg q3wk arm A, 10 mg/kg q2wk arms B and C). Pts were required to have measurable, HER-2-negative MBC and no prior chemotherapy for MBC. The primary endpoints were response rate and toxicity. Results: Accrual is complete, with 25% of pts still on study as of December 1, 2008. Of 208 pts randomized, 202 (72 arm A, 54 arm B, 76 arm C) were treated, with balanced demographics and baseline characteristics. The median age was 56 (range 29–85). 89% had visceral disease and 61% had prior neo-adjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. No significant differences in confirmed complete and partial response rates were noted (A: 42%, B: 42%, C: 41%). TTP was longer in arm C (9.2 months) versus both arms B (6.4 months) and A (7.7 months), overall p = 0.028. As per protocol-specified stopping rule, arm B was closed early due to unacceptable safety profile with significantly more grade ≥ 2 fatigue (B:57%, A: 39%, C:39%, p = 0.048) and bone pain (B: 19%, A: 10%, C:4%, p = 0.024). Neurotoxicity grade ≥ 2 was equivalent across all 3 arms (50%); febrile neutropenia occurred in [Table: see text]