Search

The burden of maternal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa is the highest in the world. As high fertility rates present an increased risk to women's health, programmes and services have been put in place to increase access to family planning. Several studies have identified sociocultural factors as limiting access to family planning, including male resistance and women's low decision-making power. However, these studies have often used a behavioural approach that anchors barriers to access in women's attitudes or motivations. In 2019, a qualitative evaluation of a family planning programme using a behavioural approach was conducted in rural Uganda, focusing on women's attitudes and unmet needs. With hindsight, we realised that our evaluation was insufficient to adequately capture barriers that extend beyond women's motivations. This paper shares three case studies that we analysed using a structural health vulnerabilities approach. Our analysis highlights political, economic, social and cultural structures that can impede access to family planning. Using a structural health vulnerabilities approach, we identify structural barriers which have their roots in the local realities women face and propose context-specific structural recommendations. Finally, we contrast our initial results with findings the case studies presented to highlight the relevance of taking structural vulnerabilities into account in future family planning programme evaluation and women's sexual and reproductive health studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: As the number of people living in cities increases worldwide, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), urban health is a growing priority of public and global health. Rapid unplanned urbanisation in LMICs has exacerbated inequalities, putting the urban poor at increased risk of ill health due to difficult living conditions in cities. Collaboration with communities in research is a key strategy for addressing the challenges they face. The objective of this scoping review is, therefore, to identify factors that influence the participation of urban communities from LMICs in public and global health research., Methods and Analysis: We will develop a search strategy with a health librarian to explore the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, Global Health and CINAHL. We will use MeSH terms and keywords exploring the concepts of 'low-income and middle-income countries', 'community participation in research' and 'urban settings' to look at empirical research conducted in English or French. There will be no restriction in terms of dates of publication. Two independent reviewers will screen and select studies, first based on titles and abstracts, and then on full text. Two reviewers will extract data. We will summarise the results using tables and fuzzy cognitive mapping., Ethics and Dissemination: This scoping review is part of a larger project to be approved by the University of Montréal's Research Ethics Committee for Science and Health in Montréal (Canada), and the Institutional Review Board of the James P Grant School of Public Health at BRAC University in Dhaka (Bangladesh). Results from the review will contribute to a participatory process seeking to combine scientific evidence with experiential knowledge of stakeholders in Dhaka to understand how to better collaborate with communities for research. The review could contribute to a shift toward research that is more inclusive and beneficial for communities., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)