Search

Background The risk of disease transmission from nonstandard risk donors (NSRDs) is low, and outcomes are similar or better relative to transplants performed with standard criteria donors. However, NSRDs have posed new ethical challenges to the informed consent (IC) process. Based on the shared decision-making model, coinciding with the 3 main timings of the IC process ([1] pretransplant assessments and waiting list registration, [2] time on the waiting list, and [3] time of the organ offer), we put forward a model (3-T Model) to summarize the knowledge on IC for NSRDs and to deliver conceptual and practical support to transplant providers on this emergent issue. Methods We searched PubMed and analyzed data from our area to provide evidence and ethical arguments to promote standardization of the timing of patient information, degree of patient participation, and disclosure of donor risk factors throughout the 3 stages of the time continuum leading to the potential acceptance of NSRDs. Results Each of the 3 timings carries special ethical significance and entails well-defined duties for transplant providers relative to patient involvement and information of the benefits and risks associated with NSRDs. Based on our framework, experience, and interpretation of the literature, we put forward a list of recommendations to combine standardization (ie, timing, content, and degree of patient participation) and individualization of IC. Conclusions The 3-T Model may enable the prevention of physicians' arbitrariness and the promotion of patient-centered care. Future studies will assess the effectiveness of the 3-T Model in transplant clinical practice.

Psychological distress imposed by the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak particularly affects patients with pre-existing medical conditions, and the progression of their diseases. Patients who fail to keep scheduled medical appointments experience a negative impact on care. The aim of this study is to investigate the psychosocial factors contributing to the cancellation of medical appointments during the pandemic by patients with pre-existing health conditions. Data were collected in eleven Italian hospitals during the last week of lockdown, and one month later. In order to assess the emotional impact of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak and the subject&rsquo, s degree of psychological flexibility, we developed an ad hoc questionnaire (ImpACT), referring to the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) model. The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) and the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ) were also used. Pervasive dysfunctional use of experiential avoidance behaviours (used with the function to avoid thought, emotions, sensations), feelings of loneliness and high post-traumatic stress scores were found to correlate with the fear of COVID-19, increasing the likelihood of cancelling medical appointments. Responding promptly to the information and psychological needs of patients who cancel medical appointments can have positive effects in terms of psychological and physical health.

An increase in the rate of non-fatal violence events, from 20.65/10,000 in 2012 to 22.81/10,000 in 2014, was observed at the IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino in Genoa.To analyze the incidence and outcome of the phenomenon of violence, by identifying the type of aggressive event and the ward in which it occurred, assuming that the occurrence is evenly distributed and not only limited to the psychiatric or to the emergency department. The age and sex of both attackers and victims of aggression were also analyzed.Retrospective analysis: study of injury trends related to episodes of violence between 2012 and 2015, incidence compared to other injuries and evaluation of the direct costs. Observational staff surveys with a questionnaire based on the Overt Aggression Scale and statistical data analysis.Following the aggressions, 36 injuries were identified over the study period (2012-2015), resulting in 431 days of absence from work. The direct estimated costs were € 64,170. The observational surveys of each ward showed a high concentration of events. Reports were received from 34 out of the 76 evaluated wards. Seventy-five percent of the reports concerned only four operative units: emergency room, intermediate care, psychiatry and geriatrics. Sixty-one percent of the questionnaires were filled out by nurses, 23% by support staff and the remaining 16% was provided by physicians and coordinators.Violence against healthcare workers is a well-known problem; action is required on the scheduling of activities, improvement of communication paths with users and the training of operators.

There is strong evidence that many patients with chronic diseases have difficulties to adhere to the medical regimens. As to transplantation, nonadherence to the prescribed medical regimen has repeatedly been found to predict morbidity and mortality, both in adults and in children. Many instruments are available in order to assess nonadherence to immunosuppressive medication, whereas only few are available on behavioural components. Aim of the study was to present the Adherence Schedule in Transplantation (ASiT, in its three versions: ASiT-A, Adults; ASiT-PA, Proxy Adult and ASiT-PC, Proxy Child) that evaluates the Cognitive Relational Antecedents of adherence to treatment and the Self-efficacy in disease management in patients before and after transplantation.(1) Review and construct analysis of the already existing adherence Schedules, on the basis of literature review and clinical experience; (2) Construction of the ASiT in its three versions from an adaptation of the already existing adherence Schedules; (3) Administration of the ASiT to pre and post transplant recipients followed by a semi-structured interview in order to discuss with the patients pros and cons; (4) ASiT correction on the basis of patients' comments; (5) Translation in English by a bilingual English mother tongue.On the whole 56 Schedules were administered to pre and post transplant (liver, heart, lung and kidney) recipients and their proxy and resulted to have good construct validity, were easily administered and were well accepted by patients.As to research the ASiT could cover a wide range of nonadherence sources. Within a clinical context our Schedule could be a not time consuming tool useful in favouring the communication about adherence and able to enhance patients' personal limits and resources.