72 results on '"GIAKOUMI, S."'
Search Results
2. The EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Opportunities and challenges on the path towards biodiversity recovery
- Author
-
Hermoso, V., Carvalho, S.B., Giakoumi, S., Goldsborough, D., Katsanevakis, S., Leontiou, S., Markantonatou, V., Rumes, B., Vogiatzakis, I.N., and Yates, K.L.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Synthesis and evaluation of coastal and marine biodiversity spatial information in the United Arab Emirates for ecosystem-based management
- Author
-
Mateos-Molina, D., Ben Lamine, E., Antonopoulou, M., Burt, J.A., Das, H.S., Javed, S., Judas, J., Khan, S.B., Muzaffar, S.B., Pilcher, N., Rodriguez-Zarate, C.J., Taylor, O.J.S., and Giakoumi, S.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Distribution, health and threats to Mediterranean macroalgal forests: defining the baselines for their conservation and restoration
- Author
-
Verdura, J, Rehues, L, Mangialajo, L, Fraschetti, S, Belattmania, Z, Bianchelli, S, Blanfune, A, Sabour, B, Chiarore, A, Danovaro, R, Fabbrizzi, E, Giakoumi, S, Ivesa, L, Katsanevakis, S, Kytinou, E, Nasto, I, Nikolaou, A, Orfanidis, S, Rilov, G, Rindi, F, Sales, M, Sini, M, Tamburello, L, Thibaut, T, Tsirintanis, K, Cebrian, E, Verdura J., Rehues L., Mangialajo L., Fraschetti S., Belattmania Z., Bianchelli S., Blanfune A., Sabour B., Chiarore A., Danovaro R., Fabbrizzi E., Giakoumi S., Ivesa L., Katsanevakis S., Kytinou E., Nasto I., Nikolaou A., Orfanidis S., Rilov G., Rindi F., Sales M., Sini M., Tamburello L., Thibaut T., Tsirintanis K., Cebrian E., Verdura, J, Rehues, L, Mangialajo, L, Fraschetti, S, Belattmania, Z, Bianchelli, S, Blanfune, A, Sabour, B, Chiarore, A, Danovaro, R, Fabbrizzi, E, Giakoumi, S, Ivesa, L, Katsanevakis, S, Kytinou, E, Nasto, I, Nikolaou, A, Orfanidis, S, Rilov, G, Rindi, F, Sales, M, Sini, M, Tamburello, L, Thibaut, T, Tsirintanis, K, Cebrian, E, Verdura J., Rehues L., Mangialajo L., Fraschetti S., Belattmania Z., Bianchelli S., Blanfune A., Sabour B., Chiarore A., Danovaro R., Fabbrizzi E., Giakoumi S., Ivesa L., Katsanevakis S., Kytinou E., Nasto I., Nikolaou A., Orfanidis S., Rilov G., Rindi F., Sales M., Sini M., Tamburello L., Thibaut T., Tsirintanis K., and Cebrian E.
- Abstract
The worldwide decline of macroalgal forests is raising major concerns for the potentially negative consequences on biodiversity and ecosystem functions, pushing for the definition of specific conservation and restoration measures. Protecting and restoring these habitats requires detailed information on their distribution, ecological status, and drivers of decline. Here, we provide the most updated available information on the distribution of Mediterranean Cystoseira s.l. forests by conducting a comprehensive bibliographic survey of literature published from 2009 to 2021, complemented by unpublished data. We also provide insights into the ecological status of these forests and the stressors affecting them across the Mediterranean basin. Our results show that most Mediterranean coasts remain un(der)studied and that the available information is concentrated in spatially limited coastal areas, restricted to very few species. When the ecological status is reported, data is highly heterogeneous, making any comparisons problematic, what claims for the description and use of easy and standardized monitoring methods for comparative purposes. Drivers of decline of Cystoseira s.l. forest have been even less investigated and, therefore, still poorly characterized. Our results highlight that our current knowledge is still insufficient to implement effective conservation and restoration strategies at the basin scale but also regionally. We call for the urgent need for mapping and standardized monitoring of Cystoseira s.l. forests to obtain baseline information for future management strategies involving their conservation, the mitigation of the stressors threatening them and the restoration of the degraded forests.
- Published
- 2023
5. The challenge of setting restoration targets for macroalgal forests under climate changes
- Author
-
Fabbrizzi, E, Giakoumi, S, De Leo, F, Tamburello, L, Chiarore, A, Colletti, A, Coppola, M, Munari, M, Musco, L, Rindi, F, Rizzo, L, Savinelli, B, Franzitta, G, Grech, D, Cebrian, E, Verdura, J, Bianchelli, S, Mangialajo, L, Nasto, I, Sota, D, Orfanidis, S, Papadopoulou, N, Danovaro, R, Fraschetti, S, Fabbrizzi E., Giakoumi S., De Leo F., Tamburello L., Chiarore A., Colletti A., Coppola M., Munari M., Musco L., Rindi F., Rizzo L., Savinelli B., Franzitta G., Grech D., Cebrian E., Verdura J., Bianchelli S., Mangialajo L., Nasto I., Sota D., Orfanidis S., Papadopoulou N. K., Danovaro R., Fraschetti S., Fabbrizzi, E, Giakoumi, S, De Leo, F, Tamburello, L, Chiarore, A, Colletti, A, Coppola, M, Munari, M, Musco, L, Rindi, F, Rizzo, L, Savinelli, B, Franzitta, G, Grech, D, Cebrian, E, Verdura, J, Bianchelli, S, Mangialajo, L, Nasto, I, Sota, D, Orfanidis, S, Papadopoulou, N, Danovaro, R, Fraschetti, S, Fabbrizzi E., Giakoumi S., De Leo F., Tamburello L., Chiarore A., Colletti A., Coppola M., Munari M., Musco L., Rindi F., Rizzo L., Savinelli B., Franzitta G., Grech D., Cebrian E., Verdura J., Bianchelli S., Mangialajo L., Nasto I., Sota D., Orfanidis S., Papadopoulou N. K., Danovaro R., and Fraschetti S.
- Abstract
The process of site selection and spatial planning has received scarce attention in the scientific literature dealing with marine restoration, suggesting the need to better address how spatial planning tools could guide restoration interventions. In this study, for the first time, the consequences of adopting different restoration targets and criteria on spatial restoration prioritization have been assessed at a regional scale, including the consideration of climate changes. We applied the decision-support tool Marxan, widely used in systematic conservation planning on Mediterranean macroalgal forests. The loss of this habitat has been largely documented, with limited evidences of natural recovery. Spatial priorities were identified under six planning scenarios, considering three main restoration targets to reflect the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Results show that the number of suitable sites for restoration is very limited at basin scale, and targets are only achieved when the recovery of 10% of regressing and extinct macroalgal forests is planned. Increasing targets translates into including unsuitable areas for restoration in Marxan solutions, amplifying the risk of ineffective interventions. Our analysis supports macroalgal forests restoration and provides guiding principles and criteria to strengthen the effectiveness of restoration actions across habitats. The constraints in finding suitable areas for restoration are discussed, and recommendations to guide planning to support future restoration interventions are also included.
- Published
- 2023
6. Evaluating the long term effectiveness of a Mediterranean marine protected area to tackle the effects of invasive and range expanding herbivorous fish on algal resources of rocky reefs through a multifaceted approach
- Author
-
Dimitriadis, C., primary, Marampouti, C., additional, Calò, A., additional, Di Franco, A., additional, Giakoumi, S., additional, Di Franco, E., additional, Di Lorenzo, M., additional, Gerovasileiou, V., additional, Guidetti, P., additional, Pey, A., additional, Sini, M., additional, and Sourbès, L., additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Unnoticed introductions, a silent threat for biodiversity: island endemic Ladigesocypris ghigii (Actinopterygii, Leuciscidae) translocated to continental Greece
- Author
-
Zogaris, S., primary, Charmpila, E. A., additional, Vukić, J., additional, Giakoumi, S., additional, Barbieri, R., additional, Zogaris, D., additional, Ašenbrenerová, E., additional, Viñuela Rodríguez, N., additional, Tarkan, A. S., additional, and Šanda, R., additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. The role of non-English-language science in informing national biodiversity assessments
- Author
-
Amano, T., Berdejo-Espinola, V., Akasaka, M., de Andrade Junior, M.A.U., Blaise, N., Checco, J., Çilingir, F.G., Citegetse, G., Tor, M.C., Drobniak, S.M., Giakoumi, S., Golivets, Maryna, Ion, M.C., Jara-Díaz, J.P., Katayose, R., Lasmana, F.P.S., Lin, H.-Y., Lopez, E., Mikula, P., Morales-Barquero, L., Mupepele, A.-C., Narváez-Gómez, J.P., Nguyen, T.H., Nogueira Lisboa, S., Nuñez, M.A., Pavón-Jordán, D., Pottier, P., Prescott, G.W., Samad, F., Šćiban, M., Seo, H.-M., Shinoda, Y., Vajna, F., Vozykova, S., Walsh, J.C., Wee, A.K.S., Xiao, H., Zamora-Gutierrez, V., Amano, T., Berdejo-Espinola, V., Akasaka, M., de Andrade Junior, M.A.U., Blaise, N., Checco, J., Çilingir, F.G., Citegetse, G., Tor, M.C., Drobniak, S.M., Giakoumi, S., Golivets, Maryna, Ion, M.C., Jara-Díaz, J.P., Katayose, R., Lasmana, F.P.S., Lin, H.-Y., Lopez, E., Mikula, P., Morales-Barquero, L., Mupepele, A.-C., Narváez-Gómez, J.P., Nguyen, T.H., Nogueira Lisboa, S., Nuñez, M.A., Pavón-Jordán, D., Pottier, P., Prescott, G.W., Samad, F., Šćiban, M., Seo, H.-M., Shinoda, Y., Vajna, F., Vozykova, S., Walsh, J.C., Wee, A.K.S., Xiao, H., and Zamora-Gutierrez, V.
- Abstract
Consulting the best available evidence is key to successful conservation decision-making. While much scientific evidence on conservation continues to be published in non-English languages, a poor understanding of how non-English-language science contributes to conservation decision-making is causing global assessments and studies to practically ignore non-English-language literature. By investigating the use of scientific literature in biodiversity assessment reports across 37 countries/territories, we have uncovered the established role of non-English-language literature as a major source of information locally. On average, non-English-language literature constituted 65% of the references cited, and these were recognized as relevant knowledge sources by 75% of report authors. This means that by ignoring non-English-language science, international assessments may overlook important information on local and/or regional biodiversity. Furthermore, a quarter of the authors acknowledged the struggles of understanding English-language literature. This points to the need to aid the use of English-language literature in domestic decision-making, for example, by providing non-English-language abstracts or improving and/or implementing machine translation. (This abstract is also avaialble in 21 other languages in Supplementary Data 4).
- Published
- 2023
9. Unnoticed introductions, a silent threat for biodiversity: island endemic Ladigesocypris ghigii(Actinopterygii, Leuciscidae) translocated to continental Greece
- Author
-
Zogaris, S., Charmpila, E. A., Vukić, J., Giakoumi, S., Barbieri, R., Zogaris, D., Ašenbrenerová, E., Viñuela Rodríguez, N., Tarkan, A. S., and Šanda, R.
- Abstract
AbstractMorphological similarity between an intruder and a native species can hinder the detection of the intruder. The undetected non-native species will thus have more time to affect the local ecosystem and spread. This paper describes an instance of unnoticed introduction of a fish species morphologically resembling a native endemic species. We report on the first established population of the Rhodes minnow, Ladigesocypris ghigii(Actinopterygii: Leuciscidae), endemic to Rhodes Island, which has been recently introduced to a river near Athens, mainland Greece. When it was first noticed, in 2017, the species was misidentified due to its morphological similarity to Pelasgus marathonicus, the only native leuciscid of the streams and rivers around Athens, until it was subject to genetic and detailed morphological examination. Genetic analyses based on both mitochondrial (cytochrome b) and nuclear (recombination activating gene, RAG1) markers unambiguously identified the collected individuals and provided information on the relationships of Ladigesocyprisat both the species and generic level. Our investigation supports that L. ghigiiwas recently established near Athens, and that the population probably originated from Rhodes Island, an eastern Aegean island. In 2021, a high-density thriving mainland population coexisted solely with the native European eel (Anguilla anguilla) along at least 9.7 km of river habitat. It was assessed as being of high invasive risk for the region where it was established by the Aquatic Species Invasiveness Screening Kit (AS-ISK) screening tool. We propose a feasibility study be undertaken to investigate the application of measures that may include actions to exterminate or contain the population. Special attention is required since the species is considered vulnerable in its native range, while the translocated population coexists with native biota within a stream ecosystem of outstanding local conservation value.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Digital storytelling as an educational tool for scientific, environmental and sustainable development literacy on marine litter in informal education environments (Case study: Hellenic Center for Marine Research)
- Author
-
Andriopoulou, A. Giakoumi, S. Kouvarda, T. Tsabaris, C. Pavlatou, E. Scoullos, M.
- Subjects
ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION - Abstract
The modern era is characterised by the explosion of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and their multiple applications both in school communities and extracurricular activities. ICT enables the school community to engage in new educational storytelling approaches with educational and learning content, using multimedia applications. This article describes a study that took place at the headquarters of the Hellenic Center for Marine Research and involved a convenience sampling of 153 high school students (ages 13 to 15 years old). The study aims to investigate the use of digital storytelling, as an instructional tool for informal learning, to develop environmental and sustainability awareness, and enhance the scientific literacy of high school students around the topic of marine litter, a serious environmental and sub-regional issue of our times. A didactic intervention was applied which focused on digital storytelling and experiential hands-on activities covering concepts of marine pollution, to establish the acquisition of new knowledge and the strengthening of optimal behaviour towards the environment and development of sustainable attitudes towards the global problem of plastic marine pollution. The results of the study confirm the importance of digital storytelling for the cultivation of students’ scientific and environmental literacy for oceans. © 2022
- Published
- 2022
11. The 2016 status of marine protected areas in the Mediterranean
- Author
-
Meola, Bruno, Webster, Chloë, Agardy, T., Bernal, M., Borg, Joseph A., Calò, A., Cebrian, D., Daméry, C., David, L., Davis, J., El Asmi, S., Giakoumi, S., Gomei, M., Guidetti, P., Hoyt, E., Jeudy de Grissac, A., Kizilkaya, Z., Mazaris, A., Notarbartolo di Sciara, G., Ody, D., Otero del Mar, M., Ouerghi, A., Piante, C., Rais, C., Ramos, A., Romani, M., Salivas, M., Sostres, M., Tetley, M. J., Thomas, H., Tunesi, L., MedPAN Secretariat, SPA/RAC, Claudet, J., Claudet, J., MedPAN Secretariat, and SPA/RAC
- Subjects
Coastal ecology -- Mediterranean Region ,Marine parks and reserves -- Mediterranean Region - Abstract
MedPAN and SPA/RAC are working alongside their partners (IUCN, WWF, local NGOs, research organization, etc.) to establish an ecological network of MPA to protect at least 10% of the marine and coastal waters which is representative of the Mediterranean’s diversity and made up of ecologically interconnected and well managed MPAs, in accordance with the latest guidelines from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Barcelona Convention. Every 4 years, MedPAN and SPA/RAC carry out the status of Mediterranean MPA to evaluate the progress that has been made, since the first inventory done in 2008, on the Mediterranean system of MPAs in view of the above mentioned objectives: does the network cover 10% of the Mediterranean, is it representative of the Mediterranean diversity, are MPAs well-connected and well managed? The main findings of the 2012 status of Marine Protected Areas in the Mediterranean Sea were that the target of 10% protection was far from being achieved, that the network was not yet coherent and that MPA management was still insufficient. This 2016 report has used the 2015-2016 inventory made on MPAs (MAPAMED) and a survey questionnaire sent to managers not only to assess the progress made since 2012 but also to identify the remaining steps needed to achieve by 2020, the objectives set for the network of MPAs by the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Barcelona Convention., peer-reviewed
- Published
- 2019
12. Conserving European biodiversity across realms
- Author
-
Giakoumi, S, Hermoso, V, Carvalho, S, Markantonatou, V, Dagys, M, Iwamura, T, Probst, W, Smith, R, Yates, KL, Almpanidou, V, Novak, T, Ben-Moshe, N, Katsanevakis, S, Claudet, J, Coll, M, Deidun, A, Essl, F, Garcia-Charton, JA, Jimenez, C, Kark, S, Mandić, M, Mazaris, A, Rabitsch, W, Stelzenmüller, V, Tricarico, E, and Vogiatzakis, I
- Subjects
Habitats Directive ,threats ,Birds Directive ,Red List ,integrated management ,multi-realm species ,conservation planning ,EU Biodiversity Strategy ,funding priorities ,Red Lis ,QH75 ,Biology - Abstract
Terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems are connected via multiple biophysical and ecological processes. Identifying and quantifying links among ecosystems is necessary for the uptake of integrated conservation actions across realms. Such actions are particularly important for species using habitats in more than one realm during their daily or life cycle. We reviewed information on the habitats of 2,408 species of European conservation concern and found that 30% of the species use habitats in multiple realms. Transportation and service corridors, which fragment species habitats, were identified as the most important threat impacting similar to 70% of the species. We examined information on 1,567 European Union (EU) conservation projects funded over the past 25 years, to assess the adequacy of efforts toward the conservation of "multi-realm" species at a continental scale. We discovered that less than a third of multi-realm species benefited from projects that included conservation actions across multiple realms. To achieve the EU's conservation target of halting biodiversity loss by 2020 and effectively protect multi-realm species, integrated conservation efforts across realms should be reinforced by: (1) recognizing the need for integrated management at a policy level, (2) revising conservation funding priorities across realms, and (3) implementing integrated land-freshwater-sea conservation planning and management.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. A risk-based approach to cumulative effect assessments for marine management.
- Author
-
Stelzenmüller, Vanessa, Coll, Marta, Mazaris, A. D., Giakoumi, S., Katsanevakis, Stelios, Portman, M., Degen, R., Mackelworth, P., Gimpe, A., Albano, P. G., Almpanidou, V., Claudet, Joachim, Essel, F., Evagelopoulos, T., Heymans, J.J., Genov, Tilen, Kark, S., Micheli, F., Pennino, Maria Grazia, Rilov, G., Rumes, B., Steenbeek, Jeroen, Stelzenmüller, Vanessa, Coll, Marta, Mazaris, A. D., Giakoumi, S., Katsanevakis, Stelios, Portman, M., Degen, R., Mackelworth, P., Gimpe, A., Albano, P. G., Almpanidou, V., Claudet, Joachim, Essel, F., Evagelopoulos, T., Heymans, J.J., Genov, Tilen, Kark, S., Micheli, F., Pennino, Maria Grazia, Rilov, G., Rumes, B., and Steenbeek, Jeroen
- Abstract
Marine ecosystems are increasingly threatened by the cumulative effects of multiple human pressures. Cumulative effect assessments (CEAs) are needed to inform environmental policy and guide ecosystem-based management. Yet, CEAs are inherently complex and seldom linked to real-world management processes. Therefore we propose entrenching CEAs in a risk management process, comprising the steps of risk identification, risk analysis and risk evaluation. We provide guidance to operationalize a risk-based approach to CEAs by describing for each step guiding principles and desired outcomes, scientific challenges and practical solutions. We reviewed the treatment of uncertainty in CEAs and the contribution of different tools and data sources to the implementation of a risk based approach to CEAs. We show that a risk-based approach to CEAs decreases complexity, allows for the transparent treatment of uncertainty and streamlines the uptake of scientific outcomes into the science-policy interface. Hence, its adoption can help bridging the gap between science and decision-making in ecosystem-based management.
- Published
- 2018
14. Simple rules can guide whether land or ocean based conservation will best benefit marine ecosystems
- Author
-
Saunders, MI, Bode, M, Atkinson, S, Klein, CJ, Metataxas, A, Beher, J, Beger, M, Mills, M, Giakoumi, S, Tulloch, V, and Possingham, HP
- Abstract
Coastal marine ecosystems can be managed by actions undertaken both on the land and in the ocean. Quantifying and comparing the costs and benefits of actions in both realms is therefore necessary for efficient management. Here, we quantify the link between terrestrial sediment run-off and a downstream coastal marine ecosystem, and contrast the cost-effectiveness of marine and land-based conservation actions. We use a dynamic land- and sea-scape model to determine whether limited funds should be directed to one of four alternative conservation actions – protection on land, protection in the ocean, restoration on land, or restoration in the ocean – to maximise the extent of light-dependent marine benthic habitats, across decadal time-scales. We apply the model to a case study seagrass meadow in Australia. We find that marine restoration is the most cost-effective action over decadal time-scales in this system, based on a conservative estimate of the rate at which seagrass can expand into new habitat. The optimal decision will vary in different social-ecological contexts, but some basic information can guide optimal investments to counteract land and ocean based stressors: (1) marine restoration should be prioritised if the rates of marine ecosystem decline and expansion are similar and low; (2) marine protection should take precedence if the rate of marine ecosystem decline is high, or if the adjacent catchment is relatively intact and has a low rate of vegetation decline; (3) land-based actions are optimal when the ratio of marine ecosystem expansion to decline is >1.4, with terrestrial restoration typically the most cost effective; and (4) land protection should be prioritised if the catchment is relatively intact, but the rate of vegetation decline is high. These rules-of-thumb illustrate how cost-effective conservation outcomes for connected land-ocean systems can proceed without complex modelling.
- Published
- 2017
15. The Science of Marine Protected Areas (3rd edition, Mediterranean)
- Author
-
Partnership for Interdisciplinary Studies of Coastal Oceans, Pisco., Lubchenco, Jane, Guidetti, P., Grorud- Colvert, K., Giakoumi, S., Gaines, S., Micheli, F., Di Carlo, G., Agardy, T., Bachet, F., Cebrián, D., Chakour, S., Claudet, J, Damanaki, M., Daniel, B., Dujmovic, S., Di Franco, A., El Asmi, S., Fouda, M., Francour, P., García-Charton, J., Gomei, M., Güçlüsoy, H., Jeudy de Grissac, A., Meola, P., Niccolini, F., Notarbartolo di Sciara, G., Planes, S., Plass-Johnson, J., Prato, G., Portman, M., Rais, C., Ben Salem, S., Staglicic, N., and Webster, C.
- Subjects
Marine Protected Areas ,Management Science ,Marine Protected Areas, Management Science - Published
- 2016
16. Vulnerability assessment of ecosystem components to human stressors: the case of a seagrass ecosystem
- Author
-
Giakoumi, S, Possingham, Hp, Gobert, S, Boudouresque, Cf, Gambi, Mc, Katsanevakis, S, Lejeune, P, Michel, L, Montefalcone, Monica, Pergent, G, Pergent Martini, C, Sanchez Jerez, P, Sini, M, Velimirov, B, Vizzini, S, Abadie, A, Coll, M, Guidetti, P, Micheli, F, and Halpern, B.
- Published
- 2014
17. Fernmetastasiertes malignes Melanom: Langzeitige aber nicht dauerhafte komplette Remission durch BRAF-Inhibitor
- Author
-
Zulueta La Rosa, P., additional, Giakoumi, S., additional, Beiteke, U., additional, Witteler, A., additional, Kügler, K., additional, and Nashan, D., additional
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Setting an ecological baseline prior to the bottom-up establishment of a marine protected area in Santorini island, Aegean Sea
- Author
-
SALOMIDI, M., primary, GIAKOUMI, S., additional, GERAKARIS, V., additional, ISSARIS, Y., additional, SINI, M., additional, and TSIAMIS, K., additional
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Developing policy-relevant river fish monitoring in Greece: Insights from a nation-wide survey
- Author
-
ECONOMOU, A. N., primary, ZOGARIS, S., additional, VARDAKAS, L., additional, KOUTSIKOS, N., additional, CHATZINIKOLAOU, Y., additional, KOMMATAS, D., additional, KAPAKOS, Y., additional, GIAKOUMI, S., additional, OIKONOMOU, E., additional, and TACHOS, V., additional
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. New Mediterranean Biodiversity Records (June 2012)
- Author
-
Nicolaidou, A., Alongi, G., Aydogan, O., Catra, M., Cavas, L., Cevik, C., Dosi, A., Circosta, V., Giakoumi, S., Gimenez-Casalduero, F., Filiz, H., Izquierdo-Munoz, A., Kalogirou, S., Konstantinidis, E., Kousteni, V., Kout, J., Legaki, A., Megalofonou, P., Ovalis, P., and Paolillo, G.
- Abstract
The present work reports on the extended distribution of nineteen species in the Mediterranean. These are: Upeneus pori (Fish:Turkey), Bursatella leachii (Mollusca, Opisthobranchia: eastern coast of Spain), Sparisoma cretense (Fish: Ionian coast of Greece), Pseudobryopsis myura (Chlorophyta:Turkey), Aplysia dactylomela (Mollusca, Opisthobranchia: Karpathos island, and Kyklades Archipelago, Greece), Asparagopsis armata and Botryocladia madagascariensis (Rhodophyta: South Peloponnesos, Greece), Oxynotus centrina (Fish: Greece), Caulerpa racemosa var. cylindracea (Chlorophyta), Stypopodium schimperi (Phaeophyta) Siganus luridus and Stephanolepis diaspros (Fish) Percnon gibbesi (Decapoda, Brachyura) (Kyklades Archipelago, Greece), Cerithium scabridum (Mollusca, Prosobranchia: Anavissos: Greece) and Cerithium renovatum (Mollusca, Prosobranchia: N. Kriti), Cassiopea andromeda (Scyphomedusa: Rhodos Island, Greece), Abra tenuis (Mollusca Bivalvia: Vouliagmeni Lake, Greece) Lagocephalus lagocephalus (Fish: Calabrian coast, Italy) and Plocamopherus ocellatus (Mollusca, Opisthobranchia: Iskenderun Bay, Turkey).
- Published
- 2012
21. Ecological mapping and data quality assessment for the needs of ecosystem-based marine spatial management: Case study Greek Ionian Sea and the adjacent gulfs
- Author
-
Issaris, Y. Katsanevakis, S. Pantazi, M. Vassilopoulou, V. Panayotidis, P. Kavadas, S. Kokkali, A. Salomidi, M. Frantzis, A. Panou, A. Damalas, D. Klaoudatos, D. Sakellariou, D. Drakopoulou, V. Kyriakidou, C. Maina, I. Fric, J. Smith, C. Giakoumi, S. Karris, G.
- Abstract
Mapping of ecosystem components (natural and socioeconomic) is a prerequisite for ecosystem-based marine spatial management (EB-MSM). To initiate the process of EB-MSM in the Greek Ionian Sea and the adjacent gulfs, the main relevant ecosystem components were mapped based on existing spatial information and expert judgment. The natural components mapped included habitat types and species targeted for conservation, according to national and European legislation and international agreements. Main human activities/pressures related to fisheries, aquaculture, tourism, and industry were also mapped. In order to assess the quality of data used to map ecosystem components and therefore take into consideration the inherent uncertainty, an assessment of 5 semi-quantitative data indicators based on a pedigree matrix was conducted. Through this qualitative approach we gained information related to the sources, acquisition and verification procedures, statistical properties, and temporal & geographical correlation, along with the collection process quality of the ecosystem components under study. A substantial overlapping between ecological features and human activities was identified, confirming the need for a well-planned approach to marine space management, in order to mitigate conflicts for marine resources and conserve marine ecosystems and their associated goods and services.
- Published
- 2012
22. Inland fishes in Cyprus: Site-specific assemblages and distributions
- Author
-
Zogaris, S., Chatzinikolaou, Y., Oikonomou, E., Koutsikos, N., Vardakas, L., Giakoumi, S., Beaumont W.R.C., and Economou, A.N.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Phylogenetics and biogeography of the Balkan ‘sand gobies’ (Teleostei: Gobiidae): vulnerable species in need of taxonomic revision
- Author
-
Vanhove, M.P.M., Economou, A.N., Zogaris, S., Larmuseau, M.H.D., Giakoumi, S., Kalogianni, E., Volckaert, F.A.M., and Huyse, T.
- Subjects
Pomatoschistus ,MED, Mediterranean ,Knipowitschia ,Economidichthys ,Ichthyology - Abstract
Within the Atlantic–Mediterranean region, the ‘sand gobies’ are abundant and widespread, and play an important role in marine, brackish, and freshwater ecosystems. They include the smallest European freshwater fish, Economidichthys trichonis, which is threatened by habitat loss and pollution, as are several other sand gobies. Key to good conservation management is an accurate account of the number of evolutionary significant units. Nevertheless, many taxonomic and evolutionary questions remain unresolved within the clade, and molecular studies are lacking, especially in the Balkans. Using partial 12S and 16S mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences of 96 specimens of at least eight nominal species (both freshwater and marine populations), we assess species relationships and compare molecular and morphological data. The results obtained do not support the monophyly of Economidichthys, suggesting the perianal organ to be a shared adaptation to hole-brooding rather than a synapomorphy, and urge for a taxonomic revision of Knipowitschia. The recently described Knipowitschia montenegrina seems to belong to a separate South-East Adriatic lineage. Knipowitschia milleri, an alleged endemic of the Acheron River, and Knipowitschia cf. panizzae, are shown to be very closely related to other western Greek Knipowitschia populations, and appear conspecific. A distinct Macedonian–Thessalian lineage is formed by Knipowitschia thessala, whereas Knipowitschia caucasica appears as an eastern lineage, with populations in Thrace and the Aegean. The present study combines the phylogeny of a goby radiation with insights on the historical biogeography of the eastern Mediterranean, and identifies evolutionary units meriting conservation attention.
- Published
- 2012
24. Distribution patterns of fish in mountain streams of Western Greece
- Author
-
Economou, A.N., Chatzinikolaou, Y., Dussling, U., Blasel, K., Giakoumi, S., and Zogaris, S.
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Biodiversity data requirements for systematic conservation planning in the Mediterranean Sea
- Author
-
Levin, N, primary, Coll, M, additional, Fraschetti, S, additional, Gal, G, additional, Giakoumi, S, additional, Göke, C, additional, Heymans, JJ, additional, Katsanevakis, S, additional, Mazor, T, additional, Öztürk, B, additional, Rilov, G, additional, Gajewski, J, additional, Steenbeek, J, additional, and Kark, S, additional
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Prey utilisation and trophic overlap between the non native mosquitofish and a native fish in two Mediterranean rivers
- Author
-
KALOGIANNI, E., primary, GIAKOUMI, S., additional, ANDRIOPOULOU, A., additional, and CHATZINIKOLAOU, Y., additional
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Ecoregion-Based Conservation Planning in the Mediterranean: Dealing with Large-Scale Heterogeneity
- Author
-
Thrush, S, Giakoumi, S, Sini, M, Gerovasileiou, V, Mazor, T, Beher, J, Possingham, HP, Abdulla, A, Cinar, ME, Dendrinos, P, Gucu, AC, Karamanlidis, AA, Rodic, P, Panayotidis, P, Taskin, E, Jaklin, A, Voultsiadou, E, Webster, C, Zenetos, A, Katsanevakis, S, Thrush, S, Giakoumi, S, Sini, M, Gerovasileiou, V, Mazor, T, Beher, J, Possingham, HP, Abdulla, A, Cinar, ME, Dendrinos, P, Gucu, AC, Karamanlidis, AA, Rodic, P, Panayotidis, P, Taskin, E, Jaklin, A, Voultsiadou, E, Webster, C, Zenetos, A, and Katsanevakis, S
- Abstract
Spatial priorities for the conservation of three key Mediterranean habitats, i.e. seagrass Posidonia oceanica meadows, coralligenous formations, and marine caves, were determined through a systematic planning approach. Available information on the distribution of these habitats across the entire Mediterranean Sea was compiled to produce basin-scale distribution maps. Conservation targets for each habitat type were set according to European Union guidelines. Surrogates were used to estimate the spatial variation of opportunity cost for commercial, non-commercial fishing, and aquaculture. Marxan conservation planning software was used to evaluate the comparative utility of two planning scenarios: (a) a whole-basin scenario, referring to selection of priority areas across the whole Mediterranean Sea, and (b) an ecoregional scenario, in which priority areas were selected within eight predefined ecoregions. Although both scenarios required approximately the same total area to be protected in order to achieve conservation targets, the opportunity cost differed between them. The whole-basin scenario yielded a lower opportunity cost, but the Alboran Sea ecoregion was not represented and priority areas were predominantly located in the Ionian, Aegean, and Adriatic Seas. In comparison, the ecoregional scenario resulted in a higher representation of ecoregions and a more even distribution of priority areas, albeit with a higher opportunity cost. We suggest that planning at the ecoregional level ensures better representativeness of the selected conservation features and adequate protection of species, functional, and genetic diversity across the basin. While there are several initiatives that identify priority areas in the Mediterranean Sea, our approach is novel as it combines three issues: (a) it is based on the distribution of habitats and not species, which was rarely the case in previous efforts, (b) it considers spatial variability of cost throughout this socioeconomicall
- Published
- 2013
28. Application of an ecosystem-based spatial management approach in a coastal area in western Greece
- Author
-
Vassilopoulou, V., primary, Issaris, Y., additional, Giakoumi, S., additional, Mavromati, G., additional, Pantazi, M., additional, Kokkali, A., additional, Kavvadas, S., additional, Maina, I., additional, Dogrammatzi, A., additional, Anagnostou, C., additional, Katsanevakis, S., additional, and Panayotidis, P., additional
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Effects of habitat and substrate complexity on shallow sublittoral fish assemblages in the Cyclades Archipelago, North-eastern Mediterranean Sea
- Author
-
GIAKOUMI, S., primary and KOKKORIS, G.D., additional
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Fernmetastasiertes malignes Melanom: Langzeitige aber nicht dauerhafte komplette Remission durch BRAF-Inhibitor.
- Author
-
La Rosa, P. Zulueta, Giakoumi, S., Beiteke, U., Witteler, A., Kügler, K., and Nashan, D.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Ecological mapping and data quality assessment for the needs of ecosystem-based marine spatial management: case study Greek Ionian Sea and the adjacent gulfs
- Author
-
ISSARIS, Y., primary, KATSANEVAKIS, S., additional, PANTAZI, M., additional, VASSILOPOULOU, V., additional, PANAYOTIDIS, P., additional, KAVADAS, S., additional, KOKKALI, A., additional, SALOMIDI, M., additional, FRANTZIS, A., additional, PANOU, A., additional, DAMALAS, D., additional, KLAOUDATOS, D.S., additional, SAKELLARIOU, D., additional, DRAKOPOULOU, P., additional, KYRIAKIDOU, C., additional, MAINA, I., additional, FRIC, J., additional, SMITH, C., additional, GIAKOUMI, S., additional, and KARRIS, G., additional
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Recent contributions to the distribution of the freshwater ichthyofauna in Greece
- Author
-
KOUTSIKOS, N., primary, ZOGARIS, S., additional, VARDAKAS, L., additional, TACHOS, V., additional, KALOGIANNI, E., additional, SANDA, R., additional, CHATZINIKOLAOU, Y., additional, GIAKOUMI, S., additional, ECONOMIDIS, P.S., additional, and ECONOMOU, A.N., additional
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. New Mediterranean Biodiversity Records (June 2012)
- Author
-
NICOLAIDOU, A., primary, ALONGI, G., additional, AYDOGAN, O., additional, CATRA, M., additional, CAVAS, L., additional, CEVIK, C., additional, DOSI, A., additional, CIRCOSTA, V., additional, GIAKOUMI, S., additional, GIMENEZ-CASALDUERO, F., additional, FILIZ, H., additional, IZQUIERDO-MUNOZ, A., additional, KALOGIROU, S., additional, KONSTANTINIDIS, E., additional, KOUSTENI, V., additional, KOUT, J., additional, LEGAKI, A., additional, MEGALOFONOU, P., additional, OVALIS, P., additional, PAOLILLO, G., additional, PASCHOS, I., additional, PERDIKARIS, C., additional, POURSANIDIS, D., additional, RAMOS-ESPLA, A.A., additional, REIZOPOULOU, S., additional, SPERONE, E., additional, TASKIN, E., additional, TRIPEPI, S., additional, and VAZQUEZ-LUIS, M., additional
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. The freshwater ichthyofauna of Greece - an update based on a hydrographic basin survey
- Author
-
ECONOMOU, A.N., primary, GIAKOUMI, S., additional, VARDAKAS, L., additional, BARBIERI, R., additional, STOUMBOUDI, M.ΤΗ., additional, and ZOGARIS, S., additional
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. An integrated assessment of the Good Environmental Status of Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas
- Author
-
Simonetta Fraschetti, Erika Fabbrizzi, Laura Tamburello, María C. Uyarra, Fiorenza Micheli, Enric Sala, Carlo Pipitone, Fabio Badalamenti, Stanislao Bevilacqua, Jordi Boada, Emma Cebrian, Giulia Ceccherelli, Mariachiara Chiantore, Giovanni D'Anna, Antonio Di Franco, Simone Farina, Sylvaine Giakoumi, Elena Gissi, Ivan Guala, Paolo Guidetti, Stelios Katsanevakis, Elisabetta Manea, Monica Montefalcone, Maria Sini, Valentina Asnaghi, Antonio Calò, Manfredi Di Lorenzo, Joaquim Garrabou, Luigi Musco, Alice Oprandi, Gil Rilov, Angel Borja, Agencia Estatal de Investigación (España), Fraschetti, S., Fabbrizzi, E., Tamburello, L., Uyarra, M. C., Micheli, F., Sala, E., Pipitone, C., Badalamenti, F., Bevilacqua, S., Boada, J., Cebrian, E., Ceccherelli, G., Chiantore, M., D'Anna, G., Di Franco, A., Farina, S., Giakoumi, S., Gissi, E., Guala, I., Guidetti, P., Katsanevakis, S., Manea, E., Montefalcone, M., Sini, M., Asnaghi, V., Calo, A., Di Lorenzo, M., Garrabou, J., Musco, L., Oprandi, A., Rilov, G., Borja, A., Fraschetti, Simonetta, Fabbrizzi, Erika, Tamburello, Laura, Uyarra, María C., Micheli, Fiorenza, Sala, Enric, Pipitone, Carlo, Badalamenti, Fabio, Bevilacqua, Stanislao, Boada, Jordi, Cebrian, Emma, Ceccherelli, Giulia, Chiantore, Mariachiara, D'Anna, Giovanni, Di Franco, Antonio, Farina, Simone, Giakoumi, Sylvaine, Gissi, Elena, Guala, Ivan, Guidetti, Paolo, Katsanevakis, Stelio, Manea, Elisabetta, Montefalcone, Monica, Sini, Maria, Asnaghi, Valentina, Calò, Antonio, Di Lorenzo, Manfredi, Garrabou, Joaquim, Musco, Luigi, Oprandi, Alice, Rilov, Gil, Borja, Angel, Fraschetti S., Fabbrizzi E., Tamburello L., Uyarra M.C., Micheli F., Sala E., Pipitone C., Badalamenti F., Bevilacqua S., Boada J., Cebrian E., Ceccherelli G., Chiantore M., D'Anna G., Di Franco A., Farina S., Giakoumi S., Gissi E., Guala I., Guidetti P., Katsanevakis S., Manea E., Montefalcone M., Sini M., Asnaghi V., Calò A., Di Lorenzo M., Garrabou J., Musco L., Oprandi A., Rilov G., and Borja A.
- Subjects
Conservation of Natural Resources ,Environmental Engineering ,Good environmental statu ,Good environmental status ,Thresholds ,Ecosystem approach ,NEAT ,Monitoring ,Science-policy gap ,Animal ,Threshold ,Fishes ,General Medicine ,Biodiversity ,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law ,Europe ,Ecosystem approach, Good environmental status, Monitoring, NEAT, Science-policy gap, Thresholds ,Mediterranean Sea ,Animals ,Conservation of Natural Resource ,Waste Management and Disposal ,Fishe ,Ecosystem - Abstract
Este artículo contiene 11 páginas, 2 figuras, 2 tablas., Local, regional and global targets have been set to halt marine biodiversity loss. Europe has set its own policy targets to achieve Good Environmental Status (GES) of marine ecosystems by implementing the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) across member states. We combined an extensive dataset across five Mediterranean ecoregions including 26 Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), their reference unprotected areas, and a no-trawl case study. Our aim was to assess if MPAs reach GES, if their effects are local or can be detected at ecoregion level or up to a Mediterranean scale, and which are the ecosystem components driving GES achievement. This was undertaken by using the analytical tool NEAT (Nested Environmental status Assessment Tool), which allows an integrated assessment of the status of marine systems. We adopted an ecosystem approach by integrating data from several ecosystem components: the seagrass Posidonia oceanica, macroalgae, sea urchins and fish. Thresholds to define the GES were set by dedicated workshops and literature review. In the Western Mediterranean, most MPAs are in good/high status, with P. oceanica and fish driving this result within MPAs. However, GES is achieved only at a local level, and the Mediterranean Sea, as a whole, results in a moderate environmental status. Macroalgal forests are overall in bad condition, confirming their status at risk. The results are significantly affected by the assumption that discrete observations over small spatial scales are representative of the total extension investigated. This calls for large-scale, dedicated assessments to realistically detect environmental status changes under different conditions. Understanding MPAs effectiveness in reaching GES is crucial to assess their role as sentinel observatories of marine systems. MPAs and trawling bans can locally contribute to the attainment of GES and to the fulfillment of the MSFD objectives. Building confidence in setting thresholds between GES and non-GES, investing in long-term monitoring, increasing the spatial extent of sampling areas, rethinking and broadening the scope of complementary tools of protection (e.g., Natura 2000 Sites), are indicated as solutions to ameliorate the status of the basin., This article was undertaken within the COST Action 15121 MarCons (http://www.marcons-cost.eu, European Cooperation in Science and Technology), the Interreg MED AMAre Plus (Ref: 8022) and the project PO FEAMP 2014-2020 Innovazione, sviluppo e sostenibilita ` nel settore della pesca e dell’acquacoltura per la Regione Campania (ISSPA 2.51). M.C.U., A.B. have been funded by the project MEDREGION (European Commission DG ENV/MSFD, 2018 call, Grant Agreement 110661/ 2018/794286/SUB/ENV.C2). Aegean Sea data were retrieved from the project PROTOMEDEA (www.protomedea.eu), funded by DG for Marine Affairs and Fisheries of the EC, under Grant Agreement SI2.721917. JB acknowledges support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Juan de la Cierva fellowship FJC 2018-035566-I)., With the institutional support of the ‘Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence’ accreditation (CEX2019-000928-S).
- Published
- 2022
36. Persistent gender bias in marine science and conservation calls for action to achieve equity
- Author
-
Elena Gissi, Michelle E. Portman, Sylvaine Giakoumi, Simonetta Fraschetti, Vanessa Stelzenmüller, Cristina Pita, Isidora Katara, Elena Lloret-Lloret, Marta Coll, Francesca Rossi, Fiorenza Micheli, European Cooperation in Science and Technology, Agencia Estatal de Investigación (España), Ecosystèmes Côtiers Marins et Réponses aux Stress (ECOMERS), Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (... - 2019) (UNS), COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), Universidade de Aveiro, Marine Sciences Institute of Andalusia, Spanish Council for Scientific Research. ICMAN (CSIC), Consorzio Nazionale Interuniversitario per le Scienze del Mare [Rome, Italie] (CoNISma), University Iuav of Venice, Ecology and Conservation Science for Sustainable Seas (ECOSEAS), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), Department of Mathematics (TECHNION), Technion - Israel Institute of Technology [Haifa], Thünen-Institute of Sea Fisheries, Smithsonian Institution, Åbo Akademi University [Turku], Giakoumi, S., Pita, C., Coll, M., Fraschetti, S., Gissi, E., Katara, I., Lloret-Lloret, E., Rossi, F., Portman, M., Stelzenmuller, V., and Micheli, F.
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,[SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes ,Compromise ,media_common.quotation_subject ,education ,[SDV.BID.SPT]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity/Systematics, Phylogenetics and taxonomy ,Gender equity ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Representation (politics) ,5. Gender equality ,Political science ,Perception ,media_common.cataloged_instance ,European Union ,14. Life underwater ,European union ,Empowerment ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Nature and Landscape Conservation ,media_common ,Women representation ,[SDE.IE]Environmental Sciences/Environmental Engineering ,business.industry ,010604 marine biology & hydrobiology ,Equity (finance) ,STEM career ,[SDE.ES]Environmental Sciences/Environmental and Society ,Leaky pipeline ,Leadership ,Oceanography ,Publishing ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,[SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology ,business ,Diversity (politics) - Abstract
7 pages, 3 figures, 1 table, supplementary data https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109134, The increasing consideration of gender balance in conservation science and practice has been reflected in the setting of global commitments. Yet, women remain under-represented in science and conservation decision-making. We compiled and analyzed data on the representation of women in hiring, publishing, funding, and leadership positions in European Union marine sciences and conservation. To explore scientists' perceptions of gender imbalance in marine sciences and conservation more broadly, we conducted a global survey and analyzed 764 questionnaires from 42 countries. Participants were also asked to identify measures that promote gender equity. We found a consistent pattern of women being under-representated across institutions and nations characterized by a relatively balanced representation of men and women in early career stages and a growing gap in later stages, with women occupying only 13% to 24% of senior positions. The same pattern was found in publishing, funding, and leadership of research institutes. Survey results demonstrate that most marine scientists are aware of the general and persistent gender bias, and perceive that it may compromise our ability to effectively solve conservation problems. Measures that increase fairness in evaluations (e.g. for hiring) and that support work-life balance ranked high, whereas gender-oriented measures, such as gender-specific scholarships, received less support. Our findings suggest that mechanisms promoting a fairer share of family responsibilities and transparent processes in hiring and evaluation are the most promising path to a more balanced participation of women in scientific leadership and conservation decision-making. Such measures may benefit not only women but diversity more generally, This article/publication is based upon work from COST Action 15121 “MarCons: Advancing marine conservation in the European and contiguous seas”, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology; www.cost.eu)., With the funding support of the ‘Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence’ accreditation (CEX2019-000928-S), of the Spanish Research Agency (AEI)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Biodiversity data requirements for systematic conservation planning in the Mediterranean Sea
- Author
-
Gideon Gal, Noam Levin, Stelios Katsanevakis, Jeroen Steenbeek, Tessa Mazor, Cordula Göke, Marta Coll, Salit Kark, Johanna J. Heymans, Bayram Öztürk, Gil Rilov, Sylvaine Giakoumi, Simonetta Fraschetti, J. Gajewski, Levin, N, Coll, M, Fraschetti, S, Gal, G, Giakoumi, S, Göke, C, Heymans, Jj, Katsanevakis, S, Mazor, T, Öztürk, B, Rilov, G, Gajewski, J, Steenbeek, J, Kark, S, Fraschetti, Simonetta, and Kark, S.
- Subjects
CONSERVATION DE LA NATURE ,RECOMMANDATIONS ,Mediterranean climate ,ANALYSE SPATIALE ,Biodiversity ,Climate change ,Spatial data ,Aquatic Science ,Mediterranean sea ,Environmental protection ,Urbanization ,Mediterranean Sea ,COLLECTE DE DONNEES ,Conservation planning ,CARTOGRAPHIE ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,PLANIFICATION ,AIRE MARINE PROTEGEE ,PROTECTION DE L'ECOSYSTEME ,Ecology ,business.industry ,BIODIVERSITE ,Environmental resource management ,Marine habitats ,Conservation planning · Mediterranean Sea · Biodiversity · Habitats · Bathymetry · Spatial data ,BASE DE DONNEES ,Habitats ,BATHYMETRIE ,Geography ,Habitat ,Bathymetry ,MILIEU MARIN ,Marine protected area ,business - Abstract
Levin, Noam ... et. al.-- 21 pages, 6 figures, 1 table, supplementary material https://doi.org//10.3354/meps10857, The Mediterranean Sea’s biodiversity and ecosystems face many threats due to anthropogenic pressures. Some of these include human population growth, coastal urbanization, accelerated human activities, and climate change. To enhance the formation of a science-based system of marine protected areas in the Mediterranean Sea, data on the spatial distribution of ecological features (abiotic variables, species, communities, habitats, and ecosystems) is required to inform conservation scientists and planners. However, the spatial data required is often lacking. In this review, we aimed to address the status of our knowledge for 3 major types of spatial information: bathymetry, classification of marine habitats, and species distributions. To exemplify the data gaps and approaches to bridge them, we examined case studies that systematically prioritize conservation in the Mediterranean Sea. We found that at present the data required for conservation planning is generally more readily available and of better quality for the European countries located in the Western Mediterranean Sea. Additionally, the Mediterranean Sea is lagging behind other marine regions where rigorous criteria for conservation planning has been applied in the past 20 yr. Therefore, we call upon scientists, governments, and international governmental and non-governmental organizations to harmonize current approaches in marine mapping and to develop a framework that is applicable throughout the Mediterranean region. Such coordination between stakeholders is urgently needed before more countries undertake further extensive habitat mapping, so that future conservation planning can use integrated spatial datasets, M.C. was funded by the Marie Curie Career EU Integration Grant Fellowships to the BIOWEB project and by the Spanish National Program Ramon y Cajal. S.F. was supported by the project CoCoNET funded by the EU. S.G. was supported by the project NETMED co-funded by the European Social Fund and the Greek State. G.R. was funded by the Marie Curie Career EU Reintegration Grant and the EU 7th Framework Programme for the project Vectors of Change in Oceans and Seas Marine Life, Impact on Economic Sectors (VECTORS). J.J.H thanks MASTS for funding
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Towards a framework for assessment and management of cumulative human impacts on marine food webs
- Author
-
Pierre Lejeune, Paolo Guidetti, Loïc Michel, Gérard Pergent, Monica Montefalcone, Sylvie Gobert, Salvatrice Vizzini, Maria-Christina Gambi, Charles-François Boudouresque, Marta Coll, Pablo Sanchez-Jerez, Hugh P. Possingham, Christine Pergent-Martini, Arnaud Abadie, Maria Sini, Sylvaine Giakoumi, Fiorenza Micheli, Branko Velimirov, Stelios Katsanevakis, Benjamin S. Halpern, Laboratoire d'Océanologie - Centre MARE, Université de Liège, Department of Marine Sciences [Aegean], University of the Aegean, Institut méditerranéen d'océanologie (MIO), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université de Toulon (UTLN)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR), Department of Earth, Environmental and Life Sciences (DISTAV), Università degli studi di Genova = University of Genoa (UniGe), Fédération de recherche Environnement et Société (FRES 3041), Université Pascal Paoli (UPP), MARine Biodiversity Exploitation and Conservation (UMR MARBEC), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Ecosystèmes Côtiers Marins et Réponses aux Stress (ECOMERS), Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) (UNS), COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), Hopkins Marine Station [Stanford], Stanford University, The Ecology Centre, University of Queensland [Brisbane], Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Toulon (UTLN), Universita degli studi di Genova, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (... - 2019) (UNS), Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Ciencias del Mar y Biología Aplicada, Biología Marina, Giakoumi, S, Halpern, BS, Michel, LN, Gobert, S, Sini, M, Boudouresque, CF, Gambi, MC, Katsanevakis, S, Lejeune, P, Montefalcone, M, Pergent, G, Pergent-Martini, C, Sanchez-Jerez, P, Velimirov, B, Vizzini, S, Abadie, A, Coll, M, Guidetti, P, Micheli, F, and Possingham, HP
- Subjects
seagrass ,Biodiversity & Conservation ,vulnerability ,05 Environmental Sciences ,Vulnerability ,THREATS ,Expert knowledge elicitation ,Food chain ,ecosystem-based management ,conservation actions, ecosystem-based management, expert knowledge elicitation, multiple threats, seagrass, vulnerability ,ECOSYSTEM-BASED MANAGEMENT ,Water Pollution, Chemical ,Zoología ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS ,Trophic level ,elicitation ,Alismatales ,Acciones de conservación ,biology ,Ecology ,multiple threats ,Seagra ,Environmental resource management ,conservation actions ,obtencion de conocimiento de expertos ,Ecosystem-based management ,Food web ,acciones de conservación ,Seagrass ,obtención de conocimiento de expertos ,Biodiversity Conservation ,Conservation action ,Alismatidae ,Know-how ,Life Sciences & Biomedicine ,acciones de conservacion ,Amenazas múltiples ,Multiple threat ,Settore BIO/07 - Ecologia ,Conservation of Natural Resources ,Food Chain ,Fisheries ,Environmental Sciences & Ecology ,Manejo con base en los ecosistemas ,amenazas múltiples ,Pastos marinos ,expert knowledge ,OCEAN ,expert knowledge elicitation ,Mediterranean Sea ,Humans ,Ecosystem ,Obtención de conocimiento de expertos ,14. Life underwater ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Nature and Landscape Conservation ,Science & Technology ,business.industry ,manejo con base en los ecosistemas ,vulnerabilidad ,pastos marinos ,15. Life on land ,06 Biological Sciences ,biology.organism_classification ,13. Climate action ,amenazas multiples ,07 Agricultural And Veterinary Sciences ,[SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology ,business ,Vulnerabilidad ,Environmental Sciences - Abstract
Effective ecosystem-based management requires understanding ecosystem responses to multiple human threats, rather than focusing on single threats. To understand ecosystem responses to anthropogenic threats holistically, it is necessary to know how threats affect different components within ecosystems and ultimately alter ecosystem functioning. We used a case study of a Mediterranean seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) food web and expert knowledge elicitation in an application of the initial steps of a framework for assessment of cumulative human impacts on food webs. We produced a conceptual seagrass food web model, determined the main trophic relationships, identified the main threats to the food web components, and assessed the components’ vulnerability to those threats. Some threats had high (e.g., coastal infrastructure) or low impacts (e.g., agricultural runoff) on all food web components, whereas others (e.g., introduced carnivores) had very different impacts on each component. Partitioning the ecosystem into its components enabled us to identify threats previously overlooked and to reevaluate the importance of threats commonly perceived as major. By incorporating this understanding of system vulnerability with data on changes in the state of each threat (e.g., decreasing domestic pollution and increasing fishing) into a food web model, managers may be better able to estimate and predict cumulative human impacts on ecosystems and to prioritize conservation actions. El manejo efectivo con base en los ecosistemas requiere entender la respuesta de los ecosistemas a múltiples amenazas humanas en lugar de enfocarse en amenazas individuales. Para entender holísticamente la respuesta de los ecosistemas a las múltiples amenazas antropogénicas es necesario saber cómo estas amenazas afectan a los diferentes componentes dentro de los ecosistemas y cómo alteran finalmente el funcionamiento de los ecosistemas. Usamos el estudio de caso de la red alimenticia del pasto marino del Mediterráneo (Posidonia oceanica) y la obtención de conocimiento de expertos en una aplicación de los pasos iniciales de un método para la evaluación de los impactos humanos acumulativos sobre las redes alimenticias. Produjimos un modelo de red alimenticia de pastos marinos, determinamos las principales relaciones tróficas, identificamos a las principales amenazas para los componentes de la red y evaluamos la vulnerabilidad de los componentes a esas amenazas. Algunas amenazas tuvieron impactos altos (p. ej.: infraestructura costera) o bajos (p. ej.: escorrentía agrícola) sobre todos los componentes de la red, mientras que otros (p. ej.: carnívoros introducidos) tuvieron impactos muy diferentes sobre cada componente. Partir al ecosistema en sus componentes nos permitió identificar amenazas no vistas previamente y reevaluar la importancia de las amenazas percibidas comúnmente como mayores. Al incorporar este entendimiento de la vulnerabilidad del sistema con datos sobre los cambios en el estado de cada amenaza (p. ej.: disminución de la contaminación doméstica e incremento de la pesca) al modelo de red alimenticia, los manejadores pueden ser capaces de estimar y predecir de mejor manera los impactos humanos acumulativos sobre los ecosistemas y priorizar las acciones de conservación. This work is a contribution of the project “NETMED” co-financed by the Greek State and the European Social Fund. Workshop funding was provided by ARC CEED-University of Queensland, the University of Liège, and STARESO. M.C. was supported by EC Marie Curie CIG grant to BIOWEB. This paper contributes to MARE publications (no. 282).
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Setting Priorities for Regional Conservation Planning in the Mediterranean Sea
- Author
-
Hugh P. Possingham, Ameer Abdulla, Luigi Maiorano, Stelios Katsanevakis, Peter Mackelworth, Simonetta Fraschetti, Fiorenza Micheli, Marta Coll, Drosos Koutsoubas, Sylvaine Giakoumi, Noam Levin, Salit Kark, Micheli, F., Levin, N., Giakoumi, S., Katsanevakis, S., Abdulla, A., Coll, M., Fraschetti, S., Kark, S., Koutsoubas, D., Mackelworth, P., Maiorano, L., Possingham, H. P., and Fraschetti, Simonetta
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Mediterranean climate ,Marine conservation ,Aquatic Organisms ,Conservation of Natural Resources ,Consensus ,Decision Making ,Biodiversity ,lcsh:Medicine ,Marine and Aquatic Sciences ,Marine Biology ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Marine Conservation ,Mediterranean sea ,Mediterranean Sea ,Animals ,Marine ecosystem ,14. Life underwater ,lcsh:Science ,Biology ,Conservation Science ,Multidisciplinary ,Ecology ,Geography ,business.industry ,010604 marine biology & hydrobiology ,Environmental resource management ,lcsh:R ,Marine Ecology ,15. Life on land ,Marine Environments ,International waters ,Habitat ,13. Climate action ,Threatened species ,Earth Sciences ,lcsh:Q ,business ,Research Article ,Ecological Environments - Abstract
Fiorenza Micheli ... et al. -- 17 páginas, 7 figuras, 3 tablas, Spatial prioritization in conservation is required to direct limited resources to where actions are most urgently needed and most likely to produce effective conservation outcomes. In an effort to advance the protection of a highly threatened hotspot of marine biodiversity, the Mediterranean Sea, multiple spatial conservation plans have been developed in recent years. Here, we review and integrate these different plans with the goal of identifying priority conservation areas that represent the current consensus among the different initiatives. A review of six existing and twelve proposed conservation initiatives highlights gaps in conservation and management planning, particularly within the southern and eastern regions of the Mediterranean and for offshore and deep sea habitats. The eighteen initiatives vary substantially in their extent (covering 0.1–58.5% of the Mediterranean Sea) and in the location of additional proposed conservation and management areas. Differences in the criteria, approaches and data used explain such variation. Despite the diversity among proposals, our analyses identified ten areas, encompassing 10% of the Mediterranean Sea, that are consistently identified among the existing proposals, with an additional 10% selected by at least five proposals. These areas represent top priorities for immediate conservation action. Despite the plethora of initiatives, major challenges face Mediterranean biodiversity and conservation. These include the need for spatial prioritization within a comprehensive framework for regional conservation planning, the acquisition of additional information from data-poor areas, species or habitats, and addressing the challenges of establishing transboundary governance and collaboration in socially, culturally and politically complex conditions. Collective prioritised action, not new conservation plans, is needed for the north, western, and high seas of the Mediterranean, while developing initial information-based plans for the south and eastern Mediterranean is an urgent requirement for true regional conservation planning, The workshop in which this work was initiated was funded by The Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (www.ceed.edu.au). The Greek television channel SKAI (www.skai.gr/tv/) covered workshop participants’ accommodation. The Biodiversity Research Group provided the workshop with consumables. FM acknowledges the support of the Pew Marine Trust and the Oak Foundation. SG was supported by the project "NETMED" cofinanced by the European Union and the Greek State. MC was funded through the Ramon y Cajal fellowship program of the Spanish Government. DK was funded through the MedPAN Network (www.medpan.org). SF was also supported by the European Community’s 7th Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under Grant Agreement No. 287844 for the project ’Towards COast to Coast NETworks of marine protected areas (from the shore to the high and deep sea), coupled with sea-based wind energy potential (COCONET)’. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript
- Published
- 2013
40. Sandy bottoms have limited species richness but substantially contribute to the regional coastal fish β-diversity: A case study of the Central Mediterranean Sea.
- Author
-
Cecapolli E, Calò A, Giakoumi S, Di Lorenzo M, Greco S, Fanelli E, Milisenda G, and Di Franco A
- Subjects
- Animals, Mediterranean Sea, Conservation of Natural Resources, Environmental Monitoring, Biodiversity, Fishes classification, Ecosystem
- Abstract
Global marine biodiversity loss impairs entire ecosystems and their stability. Robust biodiversity estimates are key to inform policies and management strategies, and need to consider the contribution of diverse habitats, including those for which estimates of biodiversity are scattered or totally absent. This study assessed the fish diversity associated with three main coastal habitats (rocky bottoms, Posidonia oceanica meadows, sandy bottoms), and their role in shaping the overall coastal fish diversity, also in relation to potential environmental and anthropogenic drivers affecting patterns of fish diversity in coastal areas. Using underwater visual census, we sampled 62 sites distributed on the three habitats, for a total of 496 replicates. We assessed the contribution of each habitat to β-diversity, divided into Local Contribution to β-diversity (LCBD), a comparative indicator of the contributions to β-diversity of each habitat, and Species Contribution to β-diversity (SCBD), which measures the relative importance of each species in affecting β-diversity. Finally, we modelled species diversity in relation to potential environmental and anthropogenic drivers. Overall, 72 species were recorded, with the highest species richness observed on rocky bottoms (56 species, 16 unique to this habitat), followed by P. oceanica (38 species, 0 unique) and sandy bottoms (32 species, 14 unique). Sandy bottom assemblages had a significantly higher contribution to LCBD than P. oceanica meadows and rocky bottoms, and two of the five species with the highest contribution to SCBD are exclusively associated with sandy bottoms. Finally, sea surface temperature, sea surface salinity, and habitat were highlighted as significant predictors of species richness. Our findings, aside from highlighting the environmental drivers of coastal fish diversity in the Mediterranean Sea, unravel the potential key role of sandy bottoms in contributing to overall coastal fish diversity and can inform conservation planning., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Deficiencies in monitoring practices of marine protected areas in southern European seas.
- Author
-
Giakoumi S, Hogg K, Di Lorenzo M, Compain N, Scianna C, Milisenda G, Claudet J, Damalas D, Carbonara P, Colloca F, Evangelopoulos A, Isajlović I, Karampetsis D, Ligas A, Marčeta B, Nenciu M, Nita V, Panayotova M, Sabatella R, Sartor P, Sgardeli V, Thasitis I, Todorova V, Vrgoč N, Scannella D, Vitale S, and Di Franco A
- Subjects
- Animals, Oceans and Seas, Biomass, Fishes physiology, Ecosystem, Fisheries, Conservation of Natural Resources, Biodiversity
- Abstract
Worldwide, states are gazetting new Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to meet the international commitment of protecting 30% of the seas by 2030. Yet, protection benefits only come into effect when an MPA is implemented with activated regulations and actively managed through continuous monitoring and adaptive management. To assess if actively managed MPAs are the rule or the exception, we used the Mediterranean and Black Seas as a case study, and retrieved information on monitoring activities for 878 designated MPAs in ten European Union (EU) countries. We searched for scientific and grey literature that provides information on the following aspects of MPA assessment and monitoring: ecological (e.g., biomass of commercially exploited fish), social (e.g., perceptions of fishers in an MPA), economic (e.g., revenue of fishers) and governance (e.g., type of governance scheme). We also queried MPA authorities on their past and current monitoring activities using a web-based survey through which we collected 123 responses. Combining the literature review and survey results, we found that approximately 16% of the MPA designations (N = 878) have baseline and/or monitoring studies. Most monitoring programs evaluated MPAs based solely on biological/ecological variables and fewer included social, economic and/or governance variables, failing to capture and assess the social-ecological dimension of marine conservation. To increase the capacity of MPAs to design and implement effective social-ecological monitoring programs, we recommend strategies revolving around three pillars: funding, collaboration, and technology. Following the actionable recommendations presented herein, MPA authorities and EU Member States could improve the low level of MPA monitoring to more effectively reach the 30% protection target delivering benefits for biodiversity conservation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. All authors reports financial support was provided by European Climate Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Assessing the potential of Other Effective area-based Conservation Measures (OECMs) for contributing to conservation targets: A global scoping review protocol.
- Author
-
Petza D, Amorim E, Ben Lamine E, Colloca F, Dominguez Crisóstomo E, Fabbrizzi E, Fraschetti S, Galparsoro I, Giakoumi S, Kruse M, Stelzenmüller V, and Katsanevakis S
- Abstract
This scoping review (ScR) protocol aims to establish the methodological approach for identifying and mapping the evidence regarding the actual contribution of Other Effective area-based Conservation Measures (OECMs) to spatial conservation targets. Emphasis will be placed on examining the research conducted, including the methodologies applied. OECMs, introduced by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in 2010, refer to areas outside of protected areas, such as fisheries restricted areas, archaeological sites, and military areas, that effectively conserve biodiversity in-situ over the long term. OECMs are recognized rather than designated. Many countries currently endeavor to identify, recognize and report OECMs to the CBD for formal acceptance to support the implementation of spatial conservation targets. Studies that assess the contribution of OECMs to spatial conservation targets will be considered. Potential OECMs with primary, secondary or ancillary conservation objectives established by all sectors in the terrestrial, freshwater and marine realm worldwide will be considered. Peer-reviewed and grey literature will be considered without imposing limitations based on publication year, stage, subject area and source type. Both experimental and observational studies in English, French, German, Greek, Italian, and Spanish will be reviewed. The ScR will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. The protocol will be guided by the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) extension for scoping reviews. The search will encompass bibliographic databases such as Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Grey literature sources will include databases, pre-print archives and organizational websites. The Covidence platform will be utilized for data management and extraction., Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed., (Copyright: © 2024 Petza D et al.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Current practices in marine systematic conservation planning: protocol for a global scoping review.
- Author
-
Fabbrizzi E, Giakoumi S, Petza D, Katsanevakis S, Domínguez Crisóstomo E, Colloca F, Elliot M, Flannery W, Galparsoro I, Kruse M, Ben Lamine E, McAteer B, Stelzenmüller V, and Fraschetti S
- Abstract
Background : Systematic Conservation Planning (SCP) involves a series of steps to identify conservation areas and develop management strategies, incorporating feedbacks, revisions, and iterations at any stage. It is a valuable tool in facilitating the effective implementation of Ecosystem-Based Marine Spatial Planning (EB-MSP). However, few efforts have been carried out to summarize information on methods, trends, and progress in SCP in the designation of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). The present work aims at providing the protocol to perform a scoping review (ScR) to assess the contribution of SCP to the design of effective MPA networks, identifying both the development of good practices and the presence of gaps of knowledge in terms of criteria for their implementation. Protocol : The ScR will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for ScRs supported the definition of this protocol. The three databases Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar will be used for the bibliographic search. Inclusion criteria will be as follows: studies applying SCP in the marine realms worldwide, assessing its contribution to the design of MPA networks. Both peer-reviewed and grey literature will be considered for eligibility. No search limitations will be applied regarding publications' year, stage, subject area and source type. Studies in English, French, German, Greek, Italian, and Spanish will be reviewed. Grey literature will be sourced from pre-print archives, institutional websites and other web-based search engines. The Covidence software will be used for the process of documents selection and data extraction. The findings of the ScR will be presented through tables, graphs, and maps, accompanied by a narrative summary of the outcomes. Conclusions : This comprehensive approach will provide a visual representation of the data, enhancing the understanding and interpretation of the results., Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed., (Copyright: © 2023 Fabbrizzi E et al.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. The challenge of setting restoration targets for macroalgal forests under climate changes.
- Author
-
Fabbrizzi E, Giakoumi S, De Leo F, Tamburello L, Chiarore A, Colletti A, Coppola M, Munari M, Musco L, Rindi F, Rizzo L, Savinelli B, Franzitta G, Grech D, Cebrian E, Verdura J, Bianchelli S, Mangialajo L, Nasto I, Sota D, Orfanidis S, Papadopoulou NK, Danovaro R, and Fraschetti S
- Subjects
- Biodiversity, Climate Change, Forests
- Abstract
The process of site selection and spatial planning has received scarce attention in the scientific literature dealing with marine restoration, suggesting the need to better address how spatial planning tools could guide restoration interventions. In this study, for the first time, the consequences of adopting different restoration targets and criteria on spatial restoration prioritization have been assessed at a regional scale, including the consideration of climate changes. We applied the decision-support tool Marxan, widely used in systematic conservation planning on Mediterranean macroalgal forests. The loss of this habitat has been largely documented, with limited evidences of natural recovery. Spatial priorities were identified under six planning scenarios, considering three main restoration targets to reflect the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Results show that the number of suitable sites for restoration is very limited at basin scale, and targets are only achieved when the recovery of 10% of regressing and extinct macroalgal forests is planned. Increasing targets translates into including unsuitable areas for restoration in Marxan solutions, amplifying the risk of ineffective interventions. Our analysis supports macroalgal forests restoration and provides guiding principles and criteria to strengthen the effectiveness of restoration actions across habitats. The constraints in finding suitable areas for restoration are discussed, and recommendations to guide planning to support future restoration interventions are also included., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. An integrated assessment of the Good Environmental Status of Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas.
- Author
-
Fraschetti S, Fabbrizzi E, Tamburello L, Uyarra MC, Micheli F, Sala E, Pipitone C, Badalamenti F, Bevilacqua S, Boada J, Cebrian E, Ceccherelli G, Chiantore M, D'Anna G, Di Franco A, Farina S, Giakoumi S, Gissi E, Guala I, Guidetti P, Katsanevakis S, Manea E, Montefalcone M, Sini M, Asnaghi V, Calò A, Di Lorenzo M, Garrabou J, Musco L, Oprandi A, Rilov G, and Borja A
- Subjects
- Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Europe, Fishes, Mediterranean Sea, Biodiversity, Ecosystem
- Abstract
Local, regional and global targets have been set to halt marine biodiversity loss. Europe has set its own policy targets to achieve Good Environmental Status (GES) of marine ecosystems by implementing the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) across member states. We combined an extensive dataset across five Mediterranean ecoregions including 26 Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), their reference unprotected areas, and a no-trawl case study. Our aim was to assess if MPAs reach GES, if their effects are local or can be detected at ecoregion level or up to a Mediterranean scale, and which are the ecosystem components driving GES achievement. This was undertaken by using the analytical tool NEAT (Nested Environmental status Assessment Tool), which allows an integrated assessment of the status of marine systems. We adopted an ecosystem approach by integrating data from several ecosystem components: the seagrass Posidonia oceanica, macroalgae, sea urchins and fish. Thresholds to define the GES were set by dedicated workshops and literature review. In the Western Mediterranean, most MPAs are in good/high status, with P. oceanica and fish driving this result within MPAs. However, GES is achieved only at a local level, and the Mediterranean Sea, as a whole, results in a moderate environmental status. Macroalgal forests are overall in bad condition, confirming their status at risk. The results are significantly affected by the assumption that discrete observations over small spatial scales are representative of the total extension investigated. This calls for large-scale, dedicated assessments to realistically detect environmental status changes under different conditions. Understanding MPAs effectiveness in reaching GES is crucial to assess their role as sentinel observatories of marine systems. MPAs and trawling bans can locally contribute to the attainment of GES and to the fulfillment of the MSFD objectives. Building confidence in setting thresholds between GES and non-GES, investing in long-term monitoring, increasing the spatial extent of sampling areas, rethinking and broadening the scope of complementary tools of protection (e.g., Natura 2000 Sites), are indicated as solutions to ameliorate the status of the basin., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Improving predictions of invasive fish ranges combining functional and ecological traits with environmental suitability under climate change scenarios.
- Author
-
Schickele A, Guidetti P, Giakoumi S, Zenetos A, Francour P, and Raybaud V
- Subjects
- Animals, Ecosystem, Fishes, Mediterranean Sea, Climate Change, Introduced Species
- Abstract
Biological invasions represent one of the main threats to marine biodiversity. From a conservation perspective, especially in the context of increasing sea warming, it is critical to examine the suitability potential of geographical areas for the arrival of Range-Expanding Introduced and Native Species (REINS), and hence anticipate the risk of such species to become invasive in their new distribution areas. Here, we developed an empirical index, based on functional and bio-ecological traits, that estimates the Invasive Potential (IP; i.e. the potential success in transport, introduction and population establishment) for a set of 13 fishes that are expanding their distributional range into the Mediterranean Sea, the most invaded sea in the world. The IP index showed significant correlation with the observed spreading of REINS. For the six species characterized by the highest IP, we calculated contemporary and future projections of their Environmental Suitability Index (ESI). By using an ensemble modelling approach, we estimated the geographical areas that are likely to be the most impacted by REINS spreading under climate change. Our results demonstrated the importance of functional traits related to reproduction for determining high invasion potential. For most species, we found high contemporary ESI values in the South-eastern Mediterranean Sea and low to intermediate contemporary ESI values in the Adriatic Sea and North-western Mediterranean sector. Moreover, we highlighted a major potential future expansion of high ESI values, and thus REINS IP, towards the northern Mediterranean, especially in the northern Adriatic Sea. This potential future northward expansion highlights the risk associated with climate-induced impacts on ecosystem conservation and fish stock management throughout the entire Mediterranean Sea., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Fishery reforms for the management of non-indigenous species.
- Author
-
Kleitou P, Crocetta F, Giakoumi S, Giovos I, Hall-Spencer JM, Kalogirou S, Kletou D, Moutopoulos DK, and Rees S
- Subjects
- Animals, Biodiversity, Conservation of Natural Resources, Fishes, Mediterranean Sea, Ecosystem, Fisheries
- Abstract
Marine ecosystems are undergoing major transformations due to the establishment and spread of Non-Indigenous Species (NIS). Some of these organisms have adverse effects, for example by reducing biodiversity and causing ecosystem shifts. Others have upsides, such as benefits to fisheries or replacing lost ecological functions and strengthening biogenic complexity. Stopping the spread of NIS is virtually impossible and so the societal challenge is how to limit the socioeconomic, health, and ecological risks, and sustainably exploit the benefits provided by these organisms. We propose a move away from the notion that NIS have only negative effects, and suggest a turn towards an Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management approach for NIS (EBFM-NIS) in the Mediterranean Sea, the world's most invaded marine region. A structured, iterative, and adaptive framework that considers the range of costs and benefits to ecosystems, ecosystem services, and fisheries is set out to determine whether NIS stocks should be managed using sustainable or unsustainable exploitation. We propose fishery reforms such as multiannual plans, annual catch limits, technical measures for sustainable exploitation, and legitimization of unlimited fishing of selected NIS and introduction of a radical new license for NIS fishing for unsustainable exploitation. Depending on local conditions, investment strategies can be included within the EBFM-NIS framework to protect/enhance natural assets to improve ecosystem resilience against NIS, as well as fishery assets to improve the performance of NIS fisheries. Examples of the former include the enhancement of Marine Protected Areas, harvesting of invasive NIS within MPAs, and protection of overfished predators and key species. Examples of the latter include market promotion and valorisation of NIS products, development of novel NIS products, and innovative/alternative NIS fishing such as fishery-related tourism ('pescatourism'). The application of the suggested EBFM-NIS would create jobs, protect and enhance ecosystem services, and help to meet the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 14: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas, and marine resources for sustainable development., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Management priorities for marine invasive species.
- Author
-
Giakoumi S, Katsanevakis S, Albano PG, Azzurro E, Cardoso AC, Cebrian E, Deidun A, Edelist D, Francour P, Jimenez C, Mačić V, Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, Rilov G, and Sghaier YR
- Subjects
- Biodiversity, Decision Making, Conservation of Natural Resources, Ecosystem, Introduced Species
- Abstract
Managing invasive alien species is particularly challenging in the ocean mainly because marine ecosystems are highly connected across broad spatial scales. Eradication of marine invasive species has only been achieved when species were detected early, and management responded rapidly. Generalized approaches, transferable across marine regions, for prioritizing actions to control invasive populations are currently lacking. Here, expert knowledge was elicited to prioritize 11 management actions for controlling 12 model species, distinguished by differences in dispersion capacity, distribution in the area to be managed, and taxonomic identity. Each action was assessed using five criteria (effectiveness, feasibility, acceptability, impacts on native communities, and cost), which were combined in an 'applicability' metric. Raising public awareness and encouraging the commercial use of invasive species were highly prioritized, whereas biological control actions were considered the least applicable. Our findings can guide rapid decision-making on prioritizing management options for the control of invasive species especially at early stages of invasion, when reducing managers' response time is critical., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. Patterns of predation on native and invasive alien fish in Mediterranean protected and unprotected areas.
- Author
-
Giakoumi S, Pey A, Thiriet P, Francour P, and Guidetti P
- Subjects
- Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Population Dynamics, Time Factors, Ecosystem, Fishes, Introduced Species, Predatory Behavior
- Abstract
Worldwide, the loss of predatory fish due to overexploitation has altered the structure of native communities and caused ecosystem shifts. Ecosystems deprived of high-level predators may be more vulnerable to invasive alien species as the latter are subject to reduced predation control. Marine protected areas (MPAs), and particularly no-take reserves where fishing is banned, can be effective tools for the restoration of predatory relationships within their boundaries. We explored whether the restoration of high-level predatory fish populations within Mediterranean MPAs can exert top-down control on alien fish. Fish tethering experiments, including native (Sardina pilchardus, Boops boops) and alien (Siganus rivulatus) dead specimens, were conducted to quantify predation within the no-take zones of three MPAs and in unprotected areas, and to assess potential differences in predation rates and prey type preferences. A subsample of experimental units was filmed to document predation events and related fish behaviour. More high-level predators interacted with the tethered fish inside the MPAs than in unprotected areas. Yet we did not find significant differences in the consumption of alien or native fishes between MPAs and unprotected areas. The native S. pilchardus was consumed more in comparison to the other tethered fishes, regardless of protection status and location. Interestingly, the alien S. rivulatus was consumed by native predators in the western Mediterranean locations where this alien fish is not established. Despite its limitations, our study provides evidence on the ability of some native predators to feed on and potentially control certain alien species without requiring 'adaptive' time-lag periods., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Organization Science improves management effectiveness of Marine Protected Areas.
- Author
-
Scianna C, Niccolini F, Giakoumi S, Di Franco A, Gaines SD, Bianchi CN, Scaccia L, Bava S, Cappanera V, Charbonnel E, Culioli JM, Di Carlo G, De Franco F, Dimitriadis C, Panzalis P, Santoro P, and Guidetti P
- Subjects
- Animals, Biomass, Ecosystem, Fisheries, Fishes, Organizations, Conservation of Natural Resources, Ecology
- Abstract
The ecological management effectiveness (EME) of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) is the degree to which MPAs reach their ecological goals. The significant variability of EME among MPAs has been partly explained by MPA design, management and implementation features (e.g. surface area, enforcement, age of protection). We investigated EME variability by employing, for the first time, Organization Science. Eight Mediterranean MPAs were taken into account as case studies to explore the relationships between EME and MPA features, such as: 1) organizational size (i.e. the ratio between the number of full-time employees and the total MPA surface area), 2) management performance (i.e. the level of effort exerted to enhance and sustain the MPA management, including enforcement), 3) total surface area, and 4) MPA age. The log-response ratios of fish biomass and density in protected vs unprotected (control) areas were used as a proxy of EME. Management performance, organizational size and, to a lesser extent, MPA age were positively correlated with the log-response ratio of fish biomass, whereas total surface area did not display a significant role. None of the four features considered was significantly correlated with the log-response ratio of fish density. Based on our findings, we argue that the employment of Organization Science in the management effectiveness assessment can assist MPA managers to reach MPAs goals more effectively, with a more efficient use of available resources., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.