Search

Mapping forest canopy height is critical for climate modeling and forest management, and tropical forests present unique challenges for remote sensing due to their dense vegetation and complex structure. The advent of ICESat-2 and GEDI, two advanced lidar datasets, offers new opportunities for improving canopy height estimation. In this study, we used footprint-level canopy height products from ICESat-2 and GEDI, combined with features extracted from Landsat-8, PALSAR-2, and FABDEM products. The AutoGluon stacking ensemble learning algorithm was employed to construct inversion models, generating 30 m resolution continuous canopy height maps for the tropical forests of Puerto Rico. Accuracy validation was performed using the high-resolution G-LiHT airborne lidar products. Results show that tropical forest canopy height inversion remains challenging, with all models yielding relative root mean square errors (rRMSE) exceeding 0.30. The stacking ensemble model outperformed all base learners, and the GEDI-based map had slightly higher accuracy than the ICESat-2-based map, with RMSE values of 4.81 and 4.99 m, respectively. Both models showed systematic biases, but the GEDI-based model exhibited less underestimation for taller canopies, making it more suitable for biomass estimation. The proposed approach can be applied to other forest ecosystems, enabling fine-resolution canopy height mapping and enhancing forest conservation efforts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Existing research on the selection of Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) different algorithms to estimate accuracy of canopy height is insufficient. Based on this, this article uses airborne LiDAR data to verify the accuracy of the canopy height extracted by GEDI for the Penobscot experimental forest and calculate the R² and RMSE of two sets of data and conduct significance test analysis to explore the impact of different algorithm selection and data acquisition time on estimation accuracy. The results show that among the six algorithms, Algorithm four has the highest accuracy, with R² = 0. 61, RMSE = 5. 74 m. For GEDI data obtained at different times, the estimation accuracy of GEDI data obtained at a time similar to that of airborne data is higher. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Forest canopy height (FCH) is an important variable for estimating forest biomass and ecosystem carbon sequestration. Spaceborne LiDAR data have been used to create wall-to-wall FCH maps, such as the forest tree height map of China (FCHChina), Global Forest Canopy Height 2020 (GFCH2020), and Global Forest Canopy Height 2019 (GFCH2019). However, these products lack comprehensive assessment. This study used airborne LiDAR data from various topographies (e.g., plain, hill, and mountain) to assess the impacts of different topographical and vegetation characteristics on spaceborne LiDAR-derived FCH products. The results show that GEDI–FCH demonstrates better accuracy in plain and hill regions, while ICESat-2 ATLAS–FCH shows superior accuracy in the mountainous region. The difficulty in accurately capturing photons from sparse tree canopies by ATLAS and the geolocation errors of GEDI has led to partial underestimations of FCH products in plain areas. Spaceborne LiDAR FCH retrievals are more accurate in hilly regions, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 4.99 m for ATLAS and 3.85 m for GEDI. GEDI–FCH is significantly affected by slope in mountainous regions, with an RMSE of 13.26 m. For wall-to-wall FCH products, the availability of FCH data is limited in plain areas. Optimal accuracy is achieved in hilly regions by FCHChina, GFCH2020, and GFCH2019, with RMSEs of 5.52 m, 5.07 m, and 4.85 m, respectively. In mountainous regions, the accuracy of wall-to-wall FCH products is influenced by factors such as tree canopy coverage, forest cover types, and slope. However, some of these errors may stem from directly using current ATL08 and GEDI L2A FCH products for mountainous FCH estimation. Introducing accurate digital elevation model (DEM) data can improve FCH retrieval from spaceborne LiDAR to some extent. This research improves our understanding of the existing FCH products and provides valuable insights into methods for more effectively extracting accurate FCH from spaceborne LiDAR data. Further research should focus on developing suitable approaches to enhance the FCH retrieval accuracy from spaceborne LiDAR data and integrating multi-source data and modeling algorithms to produce accurate wall-to-wall FCH distribution in a large area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) is a relatively new technology for global forest research, acquiring LiDAR measurements of vertical vegetation structure across Earth's tropical, sub-tropical, and temperate forests. Previous GEDI validation efforts have largely focused on top of canopy accuracy, and findings vary by geographic region and forest type. Despite this, many applications utilize measurements of vertical vegetation distribution from the lower canopy, with a wide diversity of uses for GEDI data appearing in the literature. Given the variability in data requirements across research applications and ecosystems, and the regional variability in GEDI data quality, it is imperative to understand GEDI error to draw strong inferences. Here, we quantify the accuracy of GEDI relative height metrics through canopy layers for the Brazilian Amazon. To assess the accuracy of on-orbit GEDI L2A relative height metrics, we utilize the GEDI waveform simulator to compare detailed airborne laser scanning (ALS) data from the Sustainable Landscapes Brazil project to GEDI data collected by the International Space Station. We also assess the impacts of data filtering based on biophysical and GEDI sensor conditions and geolocation correction on GEDI error metrics (RMSE, MAE, and Bias) through canopy levels. GEDI data accuracy attenuates through the lower percentiles in the relative height (RH) curve. While top of canopy (RH98) measurements have relatively high accuracy (R2 = 0.76, RMSE = 5.33 m), the accuracy of data decreases lower in the canopy (RH50: R2 = 0.54, RMSE = 5.59 m). While simulated geolocation correction yielded marginal improvements, this decrease in accuracy remained constant despite all error reduction measures. Some error rates for the Amazon are double those reported in studies from other regions. These findings have broad implications for the application of GEDI data, especially in studies where forest understory measurements are particularly challenging to acquire (e.g., dense tropical forests) and where understory accuracy is highly important. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Management Research: The Journal of the IberoAmerican Academy of Management is the property of Emerald Publishing Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Global mapping of forest height is an extremely important task for estimating habitat quality and modeling biodiversity. Recently, three global canopy height maps have been released, the global forest canopy height map (GFCH), the high‐resolution canopy height model of the Earth (HRCH), and the global map of tree canopy height (GMTCH). Here, we assessed their accuracy and usability for biodiversity modeling. We examined their accuracy by comparing them with the reference canopy height models derived from airborne laser scanning (ALS). Our results show considerable differences between the evaluated maps. The root mean square error ranged between 10 and 18 m for GFCH, 9–11 m for HRCH, and 10–17 m for GMTCH, respectively. GFCH and GMTCH consistently underestimated the height of all canopies regardless of their height, while HRCH tended to overestimate the height of low canopies and underestimate tall canopies. Biodiversity models using predicted global canopy height maps as input data are sufficient for estimating simple relationships between species occurrence and canopy height, but their use leads to a considerable decrease in the discrimination ability of the models and to mischaracterization of species niches where derived indices (e.g., canopy height heterogeneity) are concerned. We showed that canopy height heterogeneity is considerably underestimated in the evaluated global canopy height maps. We urge that for temperate areas rich in ALS data, activities should concentrate on harmonizing ALS canopy height maps rather than relying on modeled global products. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anomalies displaying significant deviations between terrain elevation products acquired from spaceborne full-waveform LiDAR and reference elevations are frequently observed in assessment studies. While the predominant focus is on "normal" data, recognizing anomalies within datasets obtained from the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) and the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) is essential for a comprehensive understanding of widely used spaceborne full-waveform data, which not only facilitates optimal data utilization but also enhances the exploration of potential applications. Nevertheless, our comprehension of anomalies remains limited as they have received scant specific attention. Diverging from prevalent practices of directly eliminating outliers, we conducted a targeted exploration of anomalies in forested areas using both transmitted and return waveforms from the GLAS and the GEDI in conjunction with airborne LiDAR point cloud data. We unveiled that elevation anomalies stem not from the transmitted pulses or product algorithms, but rather from scattering sources. We further observed similarities between the GLAS and the GEDI despite their considerable disparities in sensor parameters, with the waveforms characterized by a low signal-to-noise ratio and a near exponential decay in return energy; specifically, return signals of anomalies originated from clouds rather than the land surface. This discovery underscores the potential of deriving cloud-top height from spaceborne full-waveform LiDAR missions, particularly the GEDI, suggesting promising prospects for applying GEDI data in atmospheric science—an area that has received scant attention thus far. To mitigate the impact of abnormal return waveforms on diverse land surface studies, we strongly recommend incorporating spaceborne LiDAR-offered terrain elevation in data filtering by establishing an elevation-difference threshold against a reference elevation. This is especially vital for studies concerning forest parameters due to potential cloud interference, yet a consensus has not been reached within the community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vegetation height, and its spatial and temporal changes, is an important environmental parameter required for understanding natural habitats, estimating carbon stores and monitoring forestry activities. Recent satellite LiDAR altimetry sensors have discontinuous spatial coverage but can be combined with spatially complete remote sensing data to extrapolate to large regions. Earlier studies have focused on producing a single spatially continuous vegetation height product. This research builds on past studies, using Landsat (annual surface reflectance and fractional cover products) and the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) data to generate annual vegetation height layers from 1988 to 2022. GEDI data for 2019 were used to train and validate the model, resulting in a root mean square error (RMSE) of 5.45 m, mean absolute error (MAE) of 3.82 m, and coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.63. This accuracy reduces when the modelled height for 2020, 2021, and 2022 is compared to GEDI data for the same years (RMSE = 6.08–6.29 m, MAE = 4.36–4.73 m, and R2 = 0.48–0.54). Validation with independent field measurements across Australia from 2011 to 2021 shows an RMSE, MAE, and R2 of 8.2 m, 5.2 m, and 0.48, respectively. One source of error is the saturation of the Landsat signal in tall, closed canopy vegetation. While model accuracy is correlated with plot-based vegetation height measurements, results indicate that accuracy reduces for the years outside of the model calibration year (i.e. 2019). When compared to other vegetation height products (also produced using GEDI and spatial remote sensing data) from three independent published studies (one for 2009, one for 2019, and one for 2020), the model developed here tends to estimate 2–4 m taller than the first two studies and around 5 m shorter when compared to the third study. This investigation demonstrates the potential to produce multiyear vegetation height at a continental scale but also highlights the large uncertainty in modelled estimates especially when extrapolating to years other than the model calibration year. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Taihu Lake basin is one of the fastest-growing regions in China, where the natural environment has been seriously affected by humans. The plant area index (PAI) is an important parameter reflecting the change in vegetation growth, which plays a crucial role in studying vegetation growth and protecting the ecological environment. Advancements in remote sensing technology, complemented by machine learning techniques, have facilitated the accurate and efficient acquisition of PAI over large areas. In this study, the Taihu Lake Basin vegetation area was taken as the research object. Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) point cloud data and Landsat-8 remote sensing images were the primary information sources. MODIS land cover types were utilized to classify the vegetation into six categories. Three classical machine learning models, namely, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN), were used to estimate the PAI in the Taihu Lake Basin. It was found that the RF model showed the best performance. The determination coefficients (R2) for grassland, evergreen forest, mixed forest, deciduous forest, farmland, and wetland were 0.71, 0.67, 0.69, 0.66, 0.65, and 0.69, respectively. Over 2000-2022, the PAI exhibited an absolute change rate of 0.035, with an overall increasing trend. The area of improved and degraded vegetation accounted for 58.33% and 41.67% of the total area, respectively. The study also revealed that PAI was positively correlated with precipitation (R = 0.64, P < 0.05) and negatively correlated with temperature (R = -0.58, P < 0.05). Different land types' effects on PAI were also analyzed, with wetland PAI having the smallest mean value and evergreen forest PAI having the most considerable mean value. This research underscores the effectiveness of integrating GEDI data and Landsat-8 imagery in PAI assessment, providing valuable insights for environmental monitoring and analysis in the Taihu Lake Basin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Firm internationalisation, a key driver of global economic growth, is influenced by various entrepreneurial resources. This study explores the relationships between human capital, risk capital, risk acceptance, opportunity perception, and firm internationalisation using cross-national data from the Global Entrepreneurship Development Index (GEDI). Employing fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), this study analyzes data from 137 countries. The findings highlight two primary configurations driving internationalisation: (1) risk acceptance and opportunity perception, and (2) risk capital and opportunity perception. Opportunity perception emerges as a critical factor in both configurations, while human capital is not found to be a necessary condition. These results contribute to a better understanding of the factors that foster firm internationalisation and inform policies aimed at promoting global entrepreneurial ecosystems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI), a full-waveform light detection and ranging system, translated the energy into a continuous waveform and recorded the signals chronologically for enabling geometric analysis of the vertical structure of vegetation. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration has used the land, vegetation, and ice sensor (LVIS) airborne laser altimeter system to measure terrain, tree heights, and vegetation carbon stocks in designated areas. The effectiveness of the collected LVIS data has been proven in mapping forest structures and biomass in tropical and temperate systems. Based on the successful achievements of LVIS, the GEDI aimed to establish a global range of forest data needed to analyze and predict the carbon cycle and climate change. The GEDI was launched aboard the SpaceX-16 in 2018 and successfully attached to the International Space Station (ISS) for a 2-year mission, but now extended until March 2023. Since being mounted on the ISS, GEDI measured over 10 billion cloud-free surface observations within the range of 51.6°N to 51.6°S. In this paper, GEDI mission is introduced, and the process of downloading, refining the GEDI level-2A product focused on Gyeonggi Province is outlined.

Mapping wall-to-wall forest aboveground biomass (AGB) at large scales is critical for understanding global climate change and the carbon cycle. In previous studies, a regression-based method was commonly used to map the spatially continuous distribution of forest AGB with the aid of optical images, which may suffer from the saturation effect. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) can collect forest vertical structure information with high precision on a global scale. In this study, we proposed a collaborative kriging (co-kriging) interpolation-based method for mapping spatially continuous forest AGB by integrating GEDI and Sentinel-2 data. First, by fusing spectral features from Sentinel-2 images with vertical structure features from GEDI, the optimal estimation model for footprint-level AGB was determined by comparing different machine-learning algorithms. Second, footprint-level predicted AGB was used as the main variable, with rh95 and B12 as covariates, to build a co-kriging guided interpolation model. Finally, the interpolation model was employed to map wall-to-wall forest AGB. The results showed the following: (1) For footprint-level AGB, CatBoost achieved the highest accuracy by fusing features from GEDI and Sentinel-2 data ( R 2 = 0.87, RMSE = 49.56 Mg/ha, rRMSE = 27.06%). (2) The mapping results based on the interpolation method exhibited relatively high accuracy and mitigated the saturation effect in areas with higher forest AGB ( R 2 = 0.69, RMSE = 81.56 Mg/ha, rRMSE = 40.98%, bias = −3.236 Mg/ha). The mapping result demonstrates that the proposed method based on interpolation combined with multi-source data can be a promising solution for monitoring spatially continuous forest AGB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Geomatik is the property of Murat Yakar and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Bamboo forests, as some of the integral components of forest ecosystems, have emerged as focal points in forestry research due to their rapid growth and substantial carbon sequestration capacities. In this paper, satellite-borne lidar data from GEDI and ICESat-2/ATLAS are utilized as the main information sources, with Landsat 9 and DEM data as covariates, combined with 51 pieces of ground-measured data. Using random forest regression (RFR), boosted regression tree (BRT), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), Cubist, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and Stacking-ridge regression (RR) machine learning methods, an aboveground carbon (AGC) storage model was constructed at a regional scale. The model evaluation indices were the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), and overall estimation accuracy (P). The results showed that (1) The best-fit semivariogram models for cdem, fdem, fndvi, pdem, and andvi were Gaussian models, while those for h1b7, h2b7, h3b7, and h4b7 were spherical models; (2) According to Pearson correlation analysis, the AGC of Dendrocalamus giganteus showed an extremely significant correlation (p < 0.01) with cdem and pdem from GEDI, and also showed an extremely significant correlation with andvi, h1b7, h2b7, h3b7, and h4b7 from ICESat-2/ATLAS; moreover, AGC showed a significant correlation (0.01 < p < 0.05) with fdem and fndvi from GEDI; (3) The estimation accuracy of the GEDI model was superior to that of the ICESat-2/ATLAS model; additionally, the estimation accuracy of the Stacking-RR model, which integrates GEDI and ICESat-2/ATLAS (R2 = 0.92, RMSE = 5.73 Mg/ha, p = 86.19%), was better than that of any single model (XGBoost, RFR, BRT, KNN, Cubist); (4) Based on the Stacking-RR model, the estimated AGC of Dendrocalamus giganteus within the study area was 1.02 × 107 Mg. The average AGC was 43.61 Mg/ha, with a maximum value of 76.43 Mg/ha and a minimum value of 15.52 Mg/ha. This achievement can serve as a reference for estimating other bamboo species using GEDI and ICESat-2/ATLAS remote sensing technologies and provide decision support for the scientific operation and management of Dendrocalamus giganteus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Improving tropical forest current biomass estimates can help more accurately evaluate ecosystem services in tropical forests. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar provides detailed 3D forest structure and height data, which can be used to improve above‐ground biomass estimates. However, there is still debate on how best to predict tropical forest biomass using GEDI data. Here we compare stand biomass predicted by GEDI data with the observed data of 2,102 inventory plots in tropical forests and find that adding a remotely sensed (RS) trait map of leaf mass area (LMA) significantly (P < 0.001) improves field biomass predictions, but by only a small amount (r2 = 0.01). However, it may also help reduce the bias of the residuals because there was a negative relationship between both LMA (r2 of 0.34) and percentage of phosphorus (%P, r2 = 0.31) and residuals. Leaf spectral data (400–1,075 nm) from 523 individual trees along a Peruvian tropical forest elevation gradient predicted Diameter at Breast height (DBH) (the critical measurement underlying plot biomass) with an r2 = 0.01 and LMA predicts DBH with an r2 = 0.04. Other data sets may offer further improvements and max temperature (Tmax) predicts Amazonian biomass residuals with an r2 of 0.76 (N = 66). Finally, for a network of net primary production (NPP) and gross primary production (GPP) plots (N = 21), leaf traits predicted with remote sensing are better at predicting fluxes than structure variables. Overall, trait maps, especially future improved ones produced by Surface Biology Geology, may improve biomass and carbon flux predictions by a small but significant amount. Plain Language Summary: Improving predictions of tropical forest biomass can help us to fight climate change. In this paper, we tried to improve tropical forest biomass predictions of satellite lidar (Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation) by adding remote sensed estimates of leaf traits. Leaf traits like leaf mass area or phosphorus slightly improved predictions of forest biomass with both a ground data set and a remotely sensed data set. Further, remotely sensed trait data could help explain the differences in the prediction of remotely sensed biomass compared with field derived biomass (residuals). Maximum temperature, but not soil fertility, also improved biomass predictions. Remotely sensed leaf traits were better than structure, like tree height, for predicting net primary production (NPP) and gross primary production (GPP). Future improved hyperspectral satellite data may be used to further improve predictions of biomass, NPP and GPP. Key Points: Both field measured and remotely sensed trait data improved biomass predictions, but only by a small amountIn the Amazon region, maximum temperature, but not soil fertility, improved biomass predictionsTrait data was better than structure data for predicting tropical forest net primary production and gross primary production [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) is a high-resolution lidar instrument, facilitating landscape monitoring through forest structure and biomass assessments. Previous research has mainly focused on estimating forest attributes such as height and biomass from GEDI data. In this comprehensive study, we empirically investigate how Eucalyptus plantation characteristics and environmental factors collectively influence GEDI waveform metrics. Using a diverse dataset that includes measurements of canopy height, planting density, foliage characteristics, species composition, understorey presence and environmental conditions such as climate and soil properties, we explore the complex relationships between these attributes and GEDI waveform metrics using a two-step approach that includes assessing the linear relationship between each in-situ parameter and GEDI metrics, and also random forest modelling. Key findings include: 1) While canopy height (Ht) plays a significant role in shaping the GEDI waveform, forest wood volume (Volume), which incorporates height and diameter at breast height (DBH) of the trees and also tree stem density (Ntree/ha), exerts an even greater influence on GEDI metrics, in particular on the waveform extent (WE) and relative heights (RH); 2) The influence of factors such as foliage biomass and wood volume on GEDI waveform varies vertically from the forest floor up to forest top, and the model was more precise to predict the top part of the waveform; 3) No single attribute can solely account for the observed variations in the waveform characteristics, but multiple interactions between different forest and environmental features contribute to the complex patterns in the received waveforms. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the complex relationships between forest plantation characteristics and GEDI waveform metrics and highlights the need to consider a wide range of forest attributes in the analyse of GEDI waveform to produce more accurate canopy height or volume estimates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Ecosystem services provided by mountain forests are critically linked to forest structure. Social-ecological disturbance regimes (i.e., the rate, frequency, and patch size distribution of disturbances driven by interacting natural and anthropogenic processes) and land use affect forest structure, but their specific impacts are not fully understood. Objectives: We examine how differences in disturbance regimes affect patterns of forest structure across three European mountain ranges with similar vegetation types but different land-use histories: the European Alps, the Carpathians, and the Caucasus. Methods: We related data on horizontal and vertical forest structure, measured by spaceborne lidar (GEDI), with Landsat-derived information on forest disturbances (1986–2020) and topographic, climatic, and anthropogenic predictors. Results: We found similar social-ecological disturbance regimes in the Alps and Carpathians (average annual disturbance rates of 0.34% and 0.39%, respectively, and median patch size < 0.5 ha), yet much lower disturbance rates and patch sizes in the Caucasus (0.08% yr−1 and < 0.2 ha). Despite different disturbance regimes, we found similar patterns of forest structure. Two alternative states emerged consistently across all mountain ranges: a tall and closed-canopy state in 74–80% of forests and a low and open-canopy state (< 50% canopy cover) in the rest. While forest structure responded consistently to abiotic drivers such as topography and climate, its association with anthropogenic pressures differed between mountain ranges. Stand-replacing disturbances played an important role in the Carpathians, while forest structure in the Caucasus was related to proximity to settlements, reflecting local forest use. Conclusions: Different social-ecological contexts in mountain regions can produce markedly different forest disturbance regimes. Despite these differences, similar states of forest structures emerge, suggesting strong attractors of structure in temperate mountain forests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Remote Sensing is the property of Editorial Office of Journal of Remote Sensing & Science Publishing Co. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The launch of GEDI opens a new era of forest structure monitoring using full-waveform LiDAR from space. Simulation of GEDI waveform is of great importance for the algorithm design and forest structure metric estimation. DART is a universal 3D radiative transfer model for simulating remote sensing signals by modeling light propagation in 3D landscape, with DART-RC adopting forward ray tracing and DART-Lux adopting bidirectional path tracing to model multi-mode multi-platform LiDAR signals. GEDI simulator is a semi-empirical model for simulating GEDI waveform with point clouds. In view of their different solutions, this study aims to evaluate and inter-compare the accuracy of DART-RC, DART-Lux, and GEDI simulator for simulating GEDI waveforms in forests. Because there are possible geolocation errors and 3D modeling uncertainty in real forests, we propose to adopt virtual forests (turbid medium, RAMI scenes) for consistency evaluation and real forests for accuracy evaluation. Metrics including R2 (coefficient of determination), RMSD (root mean square deviation), RMSE (root mean square error), and bias were calculated from the normalized waveform intensities from different simulation methods.According to the results, it is demonstrated that DART-RC/Lux, when only considering first order scattering, can simulate waveforms that are highly consistent compared to GEDI simulator in virtual forests. In real forests, DART-RC/Lux which considers first order and multiple scattering can simulate more accurate waveforms than GEDI simulator in sparse canopies (ePAI 1.2). The challenge in accurate forest 3D modeling is the most likely reason causing decreasing accuracy of DART-RC/Lux in dense forests. We recommend the use of GEDI simulator when airborne point cloud is available, while the use of DART-RC and DART-Lux for mechanism studies or theoretical analysis. The results of this study contribute to a better understanding of LiDAR waveform simulation methodologies in forests.

Abstract Global mapping of forest height is an extremely important task for estimating habitat quality and modeling biodiversity. Recently, three global canopy height maps have been released, the global forest canopy height map (GFCH), the high‐resolution canopy height model of the Earth (HRCH), and the global map of tree canopy height (GMTCH). Here, we assessed their accuracy and usability for biodiversity modeling. We examined their accuracy by comparing them with the reference canopy height models derived from airborne laser scanning (ALS). Our results show considerable differences between the evaluated maps. The root mean square error ranged between 10 and 18 m for GFCH, 9–11 m for HRCH, and 10–17 m for GMTCH, respectively. GFCH and GMTCH consistently underestimated the height of all canopies regardless of their height, while HRCH tended to overestimate the height of low canopies and underestimate tall canopies. Biodiversity models using predicted global canopy height maps as input data are sufficient for estimating simple relationships between species occurrence and canopy height, but their use leads to a considerable decrease in the discrimination ability of the models and to mischaracterization of species niches where derived indices (e.g., canopy height heterogeneity) are concerned. We showed that canopy height heterogeneity is considerably underestimated in the evaluated global canopy height maps. We urge that for temperate areas rich in ALS data, activities should concentrate on harmonizing ALS canopy height maps rather than relying on modeled global products.

Eucalyptus plantations cover extensive areas in tropical regions and require accurate growth monitoring for efficient management. Traditional in-situ measurements, while necessary, are labor-intensive and impractical for large-scale assessments. Very high-resolution satellite stereo imagery is playing an increasingly important role in the estimation of fine Digital Surface Models (DSMs) across landscapes. However, its ability to estimate canopy height models (CHMs) has not been widely investigated. This study investigates the integration of high-resolution satellite stereo imagery from the Pleiades sensor with airborne or satellite Lidar data to estimate canopy height over eucalyptus plantations. Two study sites were selected in Brazil, representing flat and semi-mountainous topographies, Mato Grosso do Sul (MS) and Sao Paulo (SP), respectively. Digital Surface Models generated from Pleiades images (DSMP) were combined with Digital Terrain Models extracted from airborne Lidar data (DTMALS) to create Canopy Height Models (CHMALS). The evaluation of the CHMALS was based on two in situ canopy height measurements (Hmax and Hmean). For the SP site, the CHMALSmax, which is the average height of top 10% pixel values within each plot, correlated well with in situ Hmean, which is the average height of 10 central trees (r = 0.98), showing a bias of 1.4 m, RMSE of 3.1 m, and rRMSE of 18.5%. At the MS site, CHMALSmax demonstrated a bias of 1.9 m, RMSE of 2.3 m, rRMSE of 17.3%, and r correlation of 0.92. Despite a tendency to underestimate heights below 20 m in young tree plantations with open canopy, the results indicate reliable canopy height estimation. The study also investigates the potential of Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) elevation data as an alternative to DTMALS in absence of airborne Lidar data. The resulting CHMGedi is promising but slightly less accurate than Lidar-based CHMs. The best GEDI-based CHM (CHMGedimax) showed a bias and rRMSE of 1.3 m and 20.5% for the SP site, and 2.2 m and 24.9% for the MS site. These findings highlight the potential for integrating Pleiades and Lidar data for efficient and accurate canopy height monitoring in eucalyptus plantations.

Savannas cover more than 20% of the Earth and account for the third largest stock of global aboveground biomass yet estimates of their above ground biomass density (AGBD) are very inaccurate. The Global Ecosystem Dynamic Investigation (GEDI) sensor provides near-global full-waveform LiDAR data with 25 m footprints, from which various structural metrics are derived that are used to predict footprint level AGBD. The current GEDI L4A AGBD product uses a comprehensive Forest Structure and Biomass Database (FSBD) to develop models for specific plant functional types and geographic regions, but southern African savannas have been underrepresented in the reference data. The objectives of this study were to (i) validate GEDI L4A AGBD in South African savannas using field measurements and ALS datasets and (ii) develop and evaluate local GEDI footprint-level AGBD estimates from multiple L2A and L2B metrics. The local GEDI AGBD models outperformed GEDI L4A AGBD (R2 = 0.42, RMSE = 12 Mg/ha, %RMSE = 79.5%) with higher R2 and smaller error measures. The local GEDI AGBD using a random forest model (RF) had the highest R2 of 0.71 and lowest %RMSE of 53.3%, while the generalized linear model (GLM) results provided the lowest Relative Mean Systematic Deviation (RMSD) of 9.2%, which was half that of RF model. L4A significantly underestimated AGBD with an RMSD up to −37%. This highlights the importance and benefits of local calibration of biomass models to unlock the full potential of GEDI metrics for estimating AGBD. The field and ALS data have subsequently been contributed to the GEDI FSBD and should be used in calibration of future versions of GEDI L4A AGBD product. This research paves the way for the integration of the local GEDI AGBD estimates with other sensors, notable the eminent NISAR mission, to derive regional to global gridded AGBD products that will enable the monitoring of savanna carbon stocks.

Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) Satellite Laser Scanning mission plays a key role in forest monitoring, conducting global measurements of forest height and structure. However, the use of various stand height metrics and definitions applied to describe forest height complicates study comparisons and the selection of most suitable GEDI metric for stand height determination. Our study was focused on finding the optimal GEDI relative height (rhG) metric to describe the height of Scots pine stands. We compared GEDI rhG parameters with several metrics commonly used as reference forest stand height (a series of Airborne Laser Scanning point cloud percentiles and relative height metrics of simulated waveforms; rhSW). Results showed that GEDI rhG metrics in the 0.95–0.99 rank range can accurately describe forest stand height (ALS reference: RMSE ≤ 2.79 m; %RMSE ≤12.57%; rhSW reference: RMSE ≤ 2.80 m; %RMSE ≤12.21%). Moreover, our analyses suggested that different rhG metrics can be used to describe forest stand height depending on its height and canopy cover to increase measurements accuracy. We recommended a set of GEDI rhG metrics for adequate height measurements of Scots pine stands that can be used by forestry practitioners.

Canopy cover (CC) quantifies the proportion of canopy materials projected vertically onto the ground surface. CC is a crucial canopy structural variable and is commonly used in many ecological and climatic models. The vertical CC profile product is currently available from the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI). However, detailed information about the accuracy and uncertainty of the GEDI vertical CC profile product remains limited. The objective of this study is to validate the GEDI CC product over selected forest sites using reference values derived from digital hemispherical photography (DHP), airborne laser scanning (ALS) point clouds, and simulated waveforms. The accuracy of CC was quantified and analyzed regarding GEDI observation conditions, waveform processing, and estimation methods. The results show that the GEDI total CC correlates well with those estimated from DHP, ALS, and simulated waveform data (r2 = 0.65, 0.71, and 0.71, respectively) but is systematically underestimated (bias = −0.05, −0.11, and −0.07, respectively) based on reference data. Compared with the ALS-estimated CC, needleleaf forest shows the highest correlation for vertical CC (r2 ≥ 0.65) and shrubland shows the lowest bias for total CC (bias = −0.13). The mean absolute error (MAE) of the GEDI CC decreases from 0.15 to 0.09 as the estimation height increases from ground to 35 m. The GEDI total CCs derived from the waveform interpretation algorithms A2 and A6 display the highest r2 (≥ 0.6) and smallest RMSE (≤ 0.23) compared to those of the other algorithms. The CC accuracy increases with beam sensitivity and decreases with increasing canopy cover. The GEDI CC was improved at moderate CC values using a canopy-to-ground backscattering coefficient ratio (ρv/ρg) determined with the regression method. The partial difference between GEDI CC and ALS CC is attributed to definitional discrepancies. Further improvement of the CC algorithm can be made by using vegetation-specific waveform processing algorithms and realistic ρv/ρg values.

Forest canopy height (FCH) is one of the most important variables for carbon stock estimation. While many studies have focused on extracting FCH from spaceborne LiDAR in regions with spatially continuous and large patch sizes of forested lands, limited research has addressed the challenges of FCH extraction in plain regions with sparse and fragmented forest distributions. In this study, we proposed innovative processing approaches to extract FCH from ICESat-2 photons and GEDI footprints in the plain regions of Anhui Province, China. Specifically, we proposed a sectional photon denoising method for processing ICESat-2 data and a geolocation error correction method for processing GEDI data. Airborne LiDAR data were used to validate the extracted FCH products across typical plain regions. The results demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed methods in improving FCH extraction accuracy. Evaluation indicated that the directly extracted FCH products from ATL08 and GEDI L2A had Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) of 0.6 and 0.93, respectively. After processing with the proposed methods, the 2019 FCH products from ICESat-2 exhibited r of 0.82 and relative root mean square error (rRMSE) of 31.11% based on 3,217 ICESat-2 segments, and the products from GEDI showed r of 0.96 and rRMSE of 18.35% based on 4,862 GEDI footprints. Further application of these methods to extract FCH products from GEDI and ICESat-2 for the years 2020, 2021, and 2022 indicated their promise for addressing sparse vegetation coverage in plain regions.

Anthropogenic activities have significantly altered land cover on a global scale. These changes often have a negative effect on biodiversity limiting the distribution of species. The extent of the effect on species’ distribution depends on the landscape composition and configuration at a local and landscape level. To better understand this effect on a large scale, we evaluated how land cover and vegetation structure shape bat species’ occurrence while considering species’ imperfect detection. We hypothesize that intensification of anthropogenic activities in agriculture, for example, reduces heterogeneity of land cover and vegetation structure, and thereby, limits bat occurrence. To investigate this, we conducted acoustic bat sampling across 59 locations in southern Portugal, each with three spatial replicates. We derived fine-scale vegetation structural metrics by combining spaceborne LiDAR (GEDI) and synthetic aperture radar data (Sentinel-1 and ALOS/PALSAR-2). Additionally, we included land cover metrics and high-resolution climate data from CHELSA. Our findings revealed an important relationship between bat species’ occupancy and vegetation structure, particularly with vegetation canopy height. Moreover, forest and shrubland proportions were the main land cover types influencing bat species responses. All species’ best-ranking occupancy models included at least one climatic variable (temperature, humidity, or potential evapotranspiration), demonstrating the importance of climate when predicting bat distribution. Our acoustic surveys had a species’ detection probability varying from 0.19 to 0.86, and it was influenced by night conditions. These findings underscore the importance of modeling imperfect detection, especially for highly vagile and elusive organisms like bats. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of using vegetation and landscape metrics derived from high-resolution remote sensing data to model species distribution in the context of biodiversity monitoring and conservation.

Global forests face severe challenges owing to climate change, making dynamic and accurate monitoring of forest conditions critically important. Forests in Japan, covering approximately 70% of the country's land area, play a vital role yet often overlooked in global forestry. Japanese forests are unique, with approximately 50% comprising artificial forests, predominantly coniferous forests. Despite the Japanese government's extensive use of airborne Light Detecting and Ranging (LiDAR) to assess forest conditions, these data need more availability and frequency. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI), the first Spaceborne LiDAR data explicitly designed for vegetation monitoring, is expected to provide significant value for high-frequency and high-accuracy forest monitoring. To assess the accuracy of GEDI data in Japanese artificial coniferous forests, the reference data were gathered from 53,967,770 artificial coniferous trees via airborne LiDAR data in Aichi Prefecture, Japan. This data was then compared to the corresponding GEDI-derived terrain elevations, canopy heights (GEDI RH98), and aboveground biomass density (AGBD) estimates to assess the accuracy of GEDI data. This research also explored how different factors influence the accuracy of GEDI terrain elevation estimates, including the type of beam, time of acquisition (day or night), beam sensitivity, and terrain slope. Additionally, the effects of various forest structural parameters, such as the height-to-diameter ratio, crown length ratio, and the number of trees on the accuracy of the GEDI canopy height and AGBD, were investigated. The results showed that GEDI terrain elevation demonstrated high accuracy across various slope conditions, with rRMSE ranging from 2.28% to 3.25% and RMSE ranging from 11.68 m to 16.54 m. After geolocation adjustment, the comparison of canopy height estimates derived from GEDI to airborne LiDAR-derived canopy height also showed high accuracy, exhibiting a rRMSE of 22.04%. In contrast, the GEDI AGBD product showed moderate accuracy, with a rRMSE of 52.79%. The findings also indicated that the accuracy of GEDI RH98 was influenced by terrain slope and crown length ratio, whereas the accuracy of GEDI AGBD was mainly impacted by the number of trees and crown length ratio. This study provided the first baseline accuracy assessment of GEDI terrain elevation, RH98, and AGBD estimates in Japanese artificial forests. Furthermore, this study provided valuable insights into the accuracy of GEDI metrics by examining potential factors.

ABSTRACTOpen source Global Digital Elevation Models (GDEMs) serve as an important base for studies in geosciences. However, these models contain vertical errors due to various reasons. In this study, data from two Satellite LiDAR altimetry systems, GEDI and ICESat-2, were used to improve the vertical accuracy of GDEMs. Three different machine learning methods, namely an Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), were employed to improve existing DEM data with satellite LiDAR data. The methodology was tested in five areas with varying characteristics. Ground control data were selected from high accuracy DEMs generated from Airborne LiDAR and GNSS data. The use of ANN method improved the vertical accuracy of SRTM data from 6.45 to 3.72 m in Test area-4. Similarly, the CNN method demonstrated an improvement in the vertical accuracy of bare ground SRTM data increasing from 3.4 to 0.6 m in Test area-4. In Test area-5, the ANN method improved the vertical accuracy of SRTM data with slopes between 30 and 60%, increasing from 3.8 to 0.5 m. Notably, the results underscore the successful improvement of GDEMs across all test areas.

ABSTRACTThe Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) is expected to revolutionize the quantification of aboveground carbon at continental scales, through its unprecedented dense vertical observations of vegetation structure. As its primary task, GEDI recently introduced GEDI L4A, the 25 m near-global footprint aboveground biomass density (AGBD) product. As a global mission with significant policy and management applications, it is urgent to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of GEDI L4A and to analyze the factors affecting the product’s performance. In this study, the accuracy of GEDI L4A is assessed using co-registered airborne Lidar surveys collected during 2018 ~ 2019 and corresponding AGBD plots at 19 sites of the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON). The analysis included 11 forest types and spanned 17 eco-climatic domains across the conterminous United States to ensure the representativeness and comprehensiveness of the evaluation result. The interplay of nine factors affecting GEDI L4A is quantified, including the simulated waveform strategy deviation (SWSD) used in GEDI L4A, canopy characteristics (tree height, crown size, and canopy cover), canopy heterogeneity (crown size standard deviation, tree height standard deviation, and tree density), and other factors (forest type and topographic slope). Results show that compared with NEON observations, GEDI L4A generally underestimates the AGBD (Bias: −31.65 Mg/ha), with a moderate relative error exhibited in 14 of 19 sites (%RMSE ranging from 19% to 50%). For half of the forest types, the threshold of the lowest accuracy requirement of AGBD products set by GCOS was met or was close to being met. Broadleaf forests with high AGBD values had the lowest %RMSE (less than 35%), while coniferous forests with low AGBD values had the highest %RMSE (over 50%). Among the different factors considered, the SWSD contributed the most to GEDI L4A’s accuracy, with a relative importance of 56.63%, and manifested the indirect impacts of canopy heterogeneity and canopy characteristics. The relative importance of canopy heterogeneity (32.40%) was the second highest after SWSD; it was also much higher than that of canopy characteristics (3.99%). These results indicate the limitation of using only relative heights as predictors in GEDI L4A due to limited representation of horizontal structure and vertical tree complexity within a footprint. The findings in this study are a step forward in GEDI L4A’s appropriate application and provide perspectives to aid its improvement.

Knowledge about the vertical structure of forests, such as forest height, above-ground biomass (AGB), and the vertical biomass distribution is important for understanding carbon allocation, structural diversity, and succession and degradation dynamics in forest ecosystems. While the use of lidar (light detection and ranging) observations is well established to investigate the vertical structure of forests, the sensitivity of P-band synthetic aperture radar tomography (TomoSAR) observations to biomass and vertical forest structure is not yet well understood. Here we use lidar observations from NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) to analyse the sensitivity of airborne P-band SAR tomography backscatter to forest height and AGB at two tropical forests in Lopé and Mondah, Gabon, Africa. We use GEDI observations to parametrize an empirical model for estimating forest height and we use a random forest model for estimating AGB from TomoSAR profiles. The validation with Land, Vegetation, and Ice Sensor (LVIS) airborne lidar data shows moderate performance for estimating forest height (RMSE = 8.2 m in Lopé and 9.8 m in Mondah) and moderate to good performance for total AGB (RMSE = 115.3 Mg/ha in Lopé and 117.8 Mg/ha in Mondah). We also estimated the vertical distribution of AGB using the corrected TomoSAR backscatter and compared it with AGB profiles derived from field observations in Mondah, which indicates potential to use TomoSAR observations for estimating vertical AGB distribution over tropical forests. However, our results demonstrate the need for targeted field observations of vertical biomass profiles in order to make full use of P-band TomoSAR to map the vertical structure of tropical forests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI); a full waveform lidar sensor, acquires samples of the terrain and vegetation structures. To derive a spatially continuous estimate, the canopy height and cover metrics retrieved from GEDI L2A and L2B, respectively, were extrapolated using support vector regression models and explanatory variables derived from multiple remotely sensed datasets. Explanatory variables extrapolated GEDI canopy height with RMSE = 3.83 m (R2 = 0.84) as the performance was validated using a subset of GEDI data. However, the accuracy decreased to RMSE = 7.98 m (R2 = 0.65) as validated with field-measured canopy heights. The accuracy of the prediction of forest canopy covers retrieved from GEDI L2B generally remains poor; RMSE = 0.14 (R2 = 0.53). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to monitor long-term land use dynamics for understanding the natural forest integrity and intactness of the Rajiv Gandhi (Nagarhole) Tiger Reserve (RTR) pre- and post-declarations as TR. We employed multi-source data from Survey of India Toposheets (1:50 k), Landsat-7, and Sentinel-2A along with Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) vegetation canopy height (10 m) data, a high-spatial resolution CORONA (1970) images and temporal Google Earth Pro images for mapping and validation. To map vegetation type, land use and land cover (LULC) transitions, and fragmentation (1980–2022) we employed a hybrid classification approach. This study also analyzed decadal forest dynamics within TRs using India's State of Forest Reports (ISFR). Findings reveal significant forest fragmentation and habitat loss due to anthropogenic activities in the TR. Mono-plantations (teak and eucalyptus) were found inside TR, while the buffer (1 km) was occupied mainly with coffee and orange plantations which indicates the prevalence of human footprint. The overall accuracy of the current period (2022) is 92.0% with a kappa coefficient value of 0.90. These plantations were established during the British colonial period (early 1900s) for commercial purposes by clearing natural forests. The present study highlights that mono-plantations have not transitioned into natural forests even after a century. This lack of transformation could potentially compromise the integrity of the native forest. Despite its ecological significance, RTR has experienced disturbance due to human footprint. Hence, there is a need for an action plan to protect this vital landscape by replacing mono-plantations with suitable species to preserve the integrity of the forest. These issues extend beyond the protected areas, impacting surrounding regions and require regular monitoring. The proposed methods can be applied to other protected areas facing similar problems in the country and world. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accurate estimating of above-ground biomass (AGB) of vegetation in urbanized areas is essential for urban ecosystem services. NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) mission can obtain precise terrestrial vegetation structure, which is very useful for AGB estimation in large forested areas. However, the spatial heterogeneity and sparse distribution of vegetation in urban areas lead to great uncertainty in AGB estimation. This study proposes a method for estimating vegetation heights by fusing GEDI laser observations with features extracted from optical images. GEDI is utilized to extract the accurate vegetation canopy height, and the optical images are used to compensate for the spatial incoherence of GEDI. The correlation between the discrete vegetation heights of GEDI observations and image features is constructed using Random Forest (RF) to obtain the vegetation canopy heights in all vegetated areas, thus estimating the AGB. The results in Xuzhou of China using GEDI observations and image features from Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 satellites indicate that: (1) The method of combining GEDI laser observation data with optical images is effective in estimating AGB, and its estimation accuracy (R2 = 0.58) is higher than that of using only optical images (R2 = 0.45). (2) The total AGB in the shorter vegetation region is higher than the other two in the broadleaf forest and the coniferous forest, but the AGB per unit area is the lowest in the shorter vegetation area at 33.60 Mg/ha, and it is the highest in the coniferous forest at 46.60 Mg/ha. And the highest average AGB occurs in October–December at 59.55 Mg/ha in Xuzhou. (3) The near-infrared band has a greater influence on inverted AGB, followed by textural features. Although more precise information about vegetation should be considered, this paper provides a new method for the AGB estimation and also a way for the evaluation and utilization of urban vegetation space. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The new-era space-borne LiDAR systems, viz. ICESat-2 and GEDI, offer new possibilities for mapping terrain and canopy heights through geophysical data products, viz ATL08 (ICESat-2) and L2A (GEDI). Additionally, GEDI provides an above-ground biomass density (AGBD) product (L4A) derived through parametric calibration of L2A metrics. Detailed comparisons of these data products among different forest types and other influencing factors (viz. acquisition parameters and ground conditions) are essential for continued improvement and broader use. In this study, we perform a detailed accuracy assessment of these data products over tropical dry deciduous forests in the Central Indian region during leaf-off and leaf-on seasons with the reference airborne LiDAR data. The GEDI L4A (AGBD) product is validated against the reference AGBD map derived from the field AGBD estimates and canopy height model from airborne LiDAR. Our results suggest that regardless of leaf condition, strong or power beams during nights from both systems (GEDI and ICESat-2) are highly capable of retrieving terrain height with RMSE 2.8–3.8 m and low bias of − 0.2 m to + 1.4 m. Nevertheless, GEDI canopy height retrievals were strongly linked to leaf availability with significant underestimations (bias > − 5.8 m) during the leaf-off season against a bias of ± 1 m during the leaf-on season. In contrast, strong night beams from ICESat-2 were found to retrieve canopy heights accurately with a bias of − 0.4 m and RMSE of 3.5 m during the leaf-off season. The GEDI-AGBD estimates were found to be substantially mismatched with the reference AGBD map with an overall RMSE of 46%. The atmospheric conditions and topographic slope strongly influenced the accuracy of both systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Wetlands are amongst Earth's most dynamic and complex ecological resources, serving productive and biodiverse ecosystems. Enhancing the quality of wetland mapping through Earth observation (EO) data is essential for improving effective management and conservation practices. However, the achievement of reliable and accurate wetland mapping faces challenges due to the heterogeneous and fragmented landscape of wetlands, along with spectral similarities among different wetland classes. The present study aims to produce advanced 10 m spatial resolution wetland classification maps for four pilot sites on the Island of Newfoundland in Canada. Employing a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach, this research leverages the synergistic use of optical, synthetic aperture radar (SAR), and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data. It focuses on ecological and hydrological interpretation using multi-source and multi-sensor EO data to evaluate their effectiveness in identifying wetland classes. The diverse data sources include Sentinel-1 and -2 satellite imagery, Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) LiDAR footprints, the Multi-Error-Removed Improved-Terrain (MERIT) Hydro dataset, and the European ReAnalysis (ERA5) dataset. Elevation data and topographical derivatives, such as slope and aspect, were also included in the analysis. The study evaluates the added value of incorporating these new data sources into wetland mapping. Using the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform and the Random Forest (RF) model, two main objectives are pursued: (1) integrating the GEDI LiDAR footprint heights with multi-source datasets to generate a 10 m vegetation canopy height (VCH) map and (2) seeking to enhance wetland mapping by utilizing the VCH map as an input predictor. Results highlight the significant role of the VCH variable derived from GEDI samples in enhancing wetland classification accuracy, as it provides a vertical profile of vegetation. Accordingly, VCH reached the highest accuracy with a coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) of 0.69, a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 1.51 m, and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.26 m. Leveraging VCH in the classification procedure improved the accuracy, with a maximum overall accuracy of 93.45%, a kappa coefficient of 0.92, and an F1 score of 0.88. This study underscores the importance of multi-source and multi-sensor approaches incorporating diverse EO data to address various factors for effective wetland mapping. The results are expected to benefit future wetland mapping studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Regional carbon sink estimation and local forest management require spatially explicit maps of bamboo distribution. However, accurate bamboo mapping is challenging due to the similarity of bamboo's optical spectral with those of other vegetation. To gain a high-precision bamboo forest distribution map circa year 2020, we developed a novel classification framework that integrated in-situ measurements, GEDI, and time-series multispectral Sentinel-2 images in a whale-optimized dual-channel Dense Convolutional Network (DenseNet) classification algorithm. The new method shows that vegetation structure features from GEDI can improve the performance of bamboo mapping by more than 5 percent compared with results obtained using only spectral information. Additionally, ablation studies show our proposed dual-channel DenseNet with whale-optimized DropBlock regularization outperforms traditional deep learning algorithms. The proposed method demonstrates a high level of accuracy in identifying bamboo, with precision, recall (producer's and user's accuracies), and F1-score reaching 90.81%, 91.86%, and 91.33%, respectively, which can provide more detailed and accurate results than previous studies, especially in regions where the terrain is complex or bamboo is intermixed with other vegetation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clumping index (CI), describing the extent of foliage grouping within canopy structures that cause nonrandomness of the leaf spatial distribution within the canopy, is a structural parameter of plant canopies needed in modelling carbon and water cycles of terrestrial ecosystems. CI has been previously retrieved based on an angular index named Normalized Difference between Hotspot and Darkspot (NDHD) derived from multi-angle satellite data. However, since the darkspot reflectance used in NDHD contains shadows influenced by topographical variations, CI retrieved from NDHD is contaminated by topographic effects on multi-angle data. Moreover, the existing global CI products are limited by their spatial resolutions, e.g. 6 km from POLDER and 500 m from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). In this study, we utilized the canopy height (H) metric produced from a spaceborne LiDAR system named Global Ecosystem Dynamic Investigation (GEDI) to implement the mapping for global forest CI at 30 m resolution in the following steps: (1) The H map from GEDI and a CI map from MODIS were employed to establish the relationships between H and CI across flat terrains for different plant functional types (PFT) and vegetation foliage densities characterized using the Simple Ratio (SR); (2) Using the relationships, a new global map of forest CI is derived from the GEDI H and SR maps at 30 m resolution; (3) Field-measured CI values by the Tracing Radiation and Architecture of Canopies (TRAC) instrument at 39 sites over three continents were used to validate the new CI map with satisfactory results at all forest sites: ( R 2 = 0.84, RMSE = 0.0199 for all PTFs; R 2 = 0.42, RMSE = 0.0180 for broadleaf forests, and R 2 = 0.48, RMSE = 0.0206 for needleleaf forests). In the new global high-resolution forest CI map, CI is increased by about 10–15 % and is much less variable with topography over mountainous areas, indicating that topographical effect on CI derivation is greatly reduced. This new map would therefore be highly useful for improving terrestrial carbon and water cycle estimation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Forest canopy height is an important indicator of the forest ecosystem, and an accurate assessment of forest canopy height on a large scale is of great significance for forest resource quantification and carbon sequestration. The retrieval of canopy height based on remote sensing provides a possibility for studying forest ecosystems. This study proposes a new method for estimating forest canopy height based on remote sensing. In this method, the GEDI satellite and ICESat-2 satellite, which are different types of space-borne lidar products, are used to cooperate with the Landsat 9 image and SRTM terrain data, respectively. Two forest canopy height-retrieval models based on multi-source remote sensing integration are obtained using a random forest regression (RFR) algorithm. The study, conducted at a forest site in the northeastern United States, synthesized various remote sensing data sets to produce a robust canopy height model. First, we extracted relative canopy height products, multispectral features, and topographic data from GEDI, ICESat-2, Landsat 9, and SRTM images, respectively. The importance of each variable was assessed, and the random forest algorithm was used to analyze each variable statistically. Then, the random forest regression algorithm was used to combine these variables and construct the forest canopy height model. Validation with airborne laser scanning (ALS) data shows that the GEDI and ICESat-2 models using a single data source achieve better accuracy than the Landsat 9 model. Notably, the combination of GEDI, Landsat 9, and SRTM data (R = 0.92, MAE = 1.91 m, RMSE = 2.78 m, and rRMSE = 12.64%) and a combination of ICESat-2, Landsat 9, and SRTM data (R = 0.89, MAE = 1.84 m, RMSE = 2.54 m, and rRMSE = 10.75%). Compared with the least accurate Landsat 9 model, R increased by 29.58%, 93.48%, MAE by 44.64%, 46.20%, RMSE by 42.80%, 49.40%, and the rRMSE was increased by 42.86% and 49.32%, respectively. These results fully evaluate and discuss the practical performance and benefits of multi-source data retrieval of forest canopy height by combining space-borne lidar data with Landsat 9 data, which is of great significance for understanding forest structure and dynamics. The study provides a reliable methodology for estimating forest canopy height and valuable insights into forest resource management and its contribution to global climate change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accurate canopy height mapping is crucial for estimating rubber plantation productivity, carbon storage, and biomass accurately. The prevailing method combines Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) data with spatially continuous variables. However, these models often overlook forest growth variables and face challenges with GEDI geolocation errors. This study introduces a novel GEDI filtering technique to screen for high-quality footprints and incorporates rubber plantation age as a key factor. Utilizing a comprehensive dataset from Landsat-8, Sentinel-2, and Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR-2), we established a model for the canopy height of rubber plantations. Our multifaceted approach yields significant improvements: 1) enhanced rubber canopy height estimation accuracy, evidenced by an R-squared value of 0.86 and reduced error metrics (RMSE = 1.68, MAE = 1.32); 2) The mean difference of −2.81 ± 3.05 m compared with Potapov’s study and −5.62 ± 6.64 m compared with Liu’s, indicating superior consistency and reduced underestimation; and 3) Accurately average canopy heights for rubber plantations aged between 3 and 30 years on Hainan Island at 15.67 ± 1.87 m, spanning a height range of 5.02 to 18.59 m. The integration of stand age and the GEDI footprint filtering technique markedly enhances canopy height estimation accuracy, offering valuable insights for ecological monitoring and the advancement of sustainable forest management practices.

The spatially continuous mapping of vegetation structure parameters in forested areas serves as a crucial foundation for research in various fields, including ecosystem ecology, climate change, hydrology, and forest management and protection. However, there is a notable scarcity of regional scale data regarding vegetation structure parameters. Therefore, our objective was to fill this data gap by providing a methodology for mapping vegetation structure parameters in forested areas at regional-scale. Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) provides precise observational data on vegetation structure parameters across the world. Using GEDI vegetation structure parameter point data, we developed a vegetation state coefficient based on the ratio of plant area index (PAI) and vegetation coverage (COVER). Subsequently, we proposed a method for decomposing vegetation coverage to simulate layered vegetation coverage. Taking Jiangxi Province as a case study, we integrated machine learning models to generate a spatially continuous map of vegetation structure parameters in forested areas, including layered coverage and layered leaf area index, in 2020. The map has a spatial resolution of 30 m and a vertical resolution of 5 m. The model exhibits excellent performance. Among the 140 sets of models, approximately 63 % of them achieved an R2 surpassing 0.6, while 89 % of the models achieved a root mean square error (RMSE) below 0.3. This study can serve as a valuable reference for the decomposition of vegetation structure parameters at the regional scale and provide a more precise depiction of the spatial characteristics of vertical vegetation structure at the regional scale. It contributes by providing data support and methodological guidance for research related to forest structure analysis, resource management, and ecological process simulation at the regional scale.

Mapping forest canopy height is critical for climate modeling and forest management, and tropical forests present unique challenges for remote sensing due to their dense vegetation and complex structure. The advent of ICESat-2 and GEDI, two advanced lidar datasets, offers new opportunities for improving canopy height estimation. In this study, we used footprint-level canopy height products from ICESat-2 and GEDI, combined with features extracted from Landsat-8, PALSAR-2, and FABDEM products. The AutoGluon stacking ensemble learning algorithm was employed to construct inversion models, generating 30 m resolution continuous canopy height maps for the tropical forests of Puerto Rico. Accuracy validation was performed using the high-resolution G-LiHT airborne lidar products. Results show that tropical forest canopy height inversion remains challenging, with all models yielding relative root mean square errors (rRMSE) exceeding 0.30. The stacking ensemble model outperformed all base learners, and the GEDI-based map had slightly higher accuracy than the ICESat-2-based map, with RMSE values of 4.81 and 4.99 m, respectively. Both models showed systematic biases, but the GEDI-based model exhibited less underestimation for taller canopies, making it more suitable for biomass estimation. The proposed approach can be applied to other forest ecosystems, enabling fine-resolution canopy height mapping and enhancing forest conservation efforts.

Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) is a relatively new technology for global forest research, acquiring LiDAR measurements of vertical vegetation structure across Earth’s tropical, sub-tropical, and temperate forests. Previous GEDI validation efforts have largely focused on top of canopy accuracy, and findings vary by geographic region and forest type. Despite this, many applications utilize measurements of vertical vegetation distribution from the lower canopy, with a wide diversity of uses for GEDI data appearing in the literature. Given the variability in data requirements across research applications and ecosystems, and the regional variability in GEDI data quality, it is imperative to understand GEDI error to draw strong inferences. Here, we quantify the accuracy of GEDI relative height metrics through canopy layers for the Brazilian Amazon. To assess the accuracy of on-orbit GEDI L2A relative height metrics, we utilize the GEDI waveform simulator to compare detailed airborne laser scanning (ALS) data from the Sustainable Landscapes Brazil project to GEDI data collected by the International Space Station. We also assess the impacts of data filtering based on biophysical and GEDI sensor conditions and geolocation correction on GEDI error metrics (RMSE, MAE, and Bias) through canopy levels. GEDI data accuracy attenuates through the lower percentiles in the relative height (RH) curve. While top of canopy (RH98) measurements have relatively high accuracy (R2 = 0.76, RMSE = 5.33 m), the accuracy of data decreases lower in the canopy (RH50: R2 = 0.54, RMSE = 5.59 m). While simulated geolocation correction yielded marginal improvements, this decrease in accuracy remained constant despite all error reduction measures. Some error rates for the Amazon are double those reported in studies from other regions. These findings have broad implications for the application of GEDI data, especially in studies where forest understory measurements are particularly challenging to acquire (e.g., dense tropical forests) and where understory accuracy is highly important.

Forest canopy height (FCH) is an important variable for estimating forest biomass and ecosystem carbon sequestration. Spaceborne LiDAR data have been used to create wall-to-wall FCH maps, such as the forest tree height map of China (FCHChina), Global Forest Canopy Height 2020 (GFCH2020), and Global Forest Canopy Height 2019 (GFCH2019). However, these products lack comprehensive assessment. This study used airborne LiDAR data from various topographies (e.g., plain, hill, and mountain) to assess the impacts of different topographical and vegetation characteristics on spaceborne LiDAR-derived FCH products. The results show that GEDI–FCH demonstrates better accuracy in plain and hill regions, while ICESat-2 ATLAS–FCH shows superior accuracy in the mountainous region. The difficulty in accurately capturing photons from sparse tree canopies by ATLAS and the geolocation errors of GEDI has led to partial underestimations of FCH products in plain areas. Spaceborne LiDAR FCH retrievals are more accurate in hilly regions, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 4.99 m for ATLAS and 3.85 m for GEDI. GEDI–FCH is significantly affected by slope in mountainous regions, with an RMSE of 13.26 m. For wall-to-wall FCH products, the availability of FCH data is limited in plain areas. Optimal accuracy is achieved in hilly regions by FCHChina, GFCH2020, and GFCH2019, with RMSEs of 5.52 m, 5.07 m, and 4.85 m, respectively. In mountainous regions, the accuracy of wall-to-wall FCH products is influenced by factors such as tree canopy coverage, forest cover types, and slope. However, some of these errors may stem from directly using current ATL08 and GEDI L2A FCH products for mountainous FCH estimation. Introducing accurate digital elevation model (DEM) data can improve FCH retrieval from spaceborne LiDAR to some extent. This research improves our understanding of the existing FCH products and provides valuable insights into methods for more effectively extracting accurate FCH from spaceborne LiDAR data. Further research should focus on developing suitable approaches to enhance the FCH retrieval accuracy from spaceborne LiDAR data and integrating multi-source data and modeling algorithms to produce accurate wall-to-wall FCH distribution in a large area.

Firm internationalisation, a key driver of global economic growth, is influenced by various entrepreneurial resources. This study explores the relationships between human capital, risk capital, risk acceptance, opportunity perception, and firm internationalisation using cross-national data from the Global Entrepreneurship Development Index (GEDI). Employing fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), this study analyzes data from 137 countries. The findings highlight two primary configurations driving internationalisation: (1) risk acceptance and opportunity perception, and (2) risk capital and opportunity perception. Opportunity perception emerges as a critical factor in both configurations, while human capital is not found to be a necessary condition. These results contribute to a better understanding of the factors that foster firm internationalisation and inform policies aimed at promoting global entrepreneurial ecosystems.

Monitoring changes in carbon stocks through forest biomass assessment is crucial for carbon cycle studies. However, challenges in obtaining timely and reliable ground measurements hinder creation of the spatially continuous maps of forest aboveground biomass density (AGBD). This study proposes an approach for generating spatially continuous maps of forest aboveground biomass density (AGBD) by combining Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) LiDAR-based data with open-access earth observation (EO) data. The key contribution of the study lies in the systematic evaluation of various model configurations to select the optimal model for AGBD generation. The evaluation considered various model configurations, including predictor sets, spatial resolution, beam selection, and sensitivity thresholds. We used a Random Forest model, trained through five-fold cross-validation on 80% of the total data, to estimate AGBD in the Indian forest region. Model performance was assessed using the 20% independent test dataset. Results, using Sentinel-1 and 2 predictors, yielded R2 values of 0.55 to 0.60 and RMSE of 48.5 to 56.3 Mg/ha. Incorporating forest and agroclimatic zone attributes improved performance (R2: 0.59 to 0.69, RMSE: 42.2 to 53.3 Mg/ha). The selection of the top 15 predictors, which favoured features from Sentinel-2, DEM, forest attributes, and agroclimatic zones, and GEDI data with sensitivity >0.98, yielded the optimal model with an R2 of 0.64 and RMSE of 46.59 Mg/ha. The results underscore the significance of incorporating attributes like forest and agro-climatic zones and the need for an optimal model selection considering predictor types and GEDI shot characteristics. The top-performing model is validated in Simdega, Jharkhand (R2: 0.74, RMSE: 39.3 Mg/ha), demonstrating the methodological potential of this approach. Overall, this study emphasizes the methodological prospects of integrating multi-source open-access EO data to produce spatially continuous aboveground biomass (AGB) maps through data fusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The 21st century has seen the launch of new space-borne sensors based on LiDAR (light detection and ranging) technology developed in the second half of the 20th century. Nowadays, these sensors offer novel opportunities for mapping terrain and canopy heights and estimating aboveground biomass (AGB) across local to regional scales. This study aims to analyze the scientific impact of these sensors on large-scale forest mapping to retrieve 3D canopy information, monitor forest degradation, estimate AGB, and model key ecosystem variables such as primary productivity and biodiversity. A worldwide bibliometric analysis of this topic was carried out based on up to 412 publications indexed in the Scopus database during the period 2004–2022. The results showed that the number of published documents increased exponentially in the last five years, coinciding with the commissioning of two new LiDAR space missions: Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite (ICESat-2) and Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI). These missions have been providing data since 2018 and 2019, respectively. The journal that demonstrated the highest productivity in this field was "Remote Sensing" and among the leading contributors, the top five countries in terms of publications were the USA, China, the UK, France, and Germany. The upward trajectory in the number of publications categorizes this subject as a highly trending research topic, particularly in the context of improving forest resource management and participating in global climate treaty frameworks that require monitoring and reporting on forest carbon stocks. In this context, the integration of space-borne data, including imagery, SAR, and LiDAR, is anticipated to steer the trajectory of this research in the upcoming years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Continuous characterizations of forest structure are critical for modeling wildlife habitat as well as for assessing trade-offs with additional ecosystem services. To overcome the spatial and temporal limitations of airborne lidar data for studying wide-ranging animals and for monitoring wildlife habitat through time, novel sampling data sources, including the space-borne Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar instrument, may be incorporated within data fusion frameworks to scale up satellite-based estimates of forest structure across continuous spatial extents. The objectives of this study were to: 1) investigate the value and limitations of satellite data sources for generating GEDI-fusion models and 30m resolution predictive maps of eight forest structure measures across six western U.S. states (Colorado, Wyoming, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Montana); 2) evaluate the suitability of GEDI as a reference data source and assess any spatiotemporal biases of GEDI-fusion maps using samples of airborne lidar data; and 3) examine differences in GEDI-fusion products for inclusion within wildlife habitat models for three keystone woodpecker species with varying forest structure needs. We focused on two fusion models, one that combined Landsat, Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar, disturbance, topographic, and bioclimatic predictor information (combined model), and one that was restricted to Landsat, topographic, and bioclimatic predictors (Landsat/topo/bio model). Model performance varied across the eight GEDI structure measures although all representing moderate to high predictive performance (model testing R2 values ranging from 0.36 to 0.76). Results were similar between fusion models, as well as for map validations for years of model creation (2019-2020) and hindcasted years (2016-2018). Within our wildlife case studies, modeling encounter rates of the three woodpecker species using GEDI-fusion inputs yielded AUC values ranging from 0.76-0.87 with observed relationships that followed our ecological understanding of the species. While our results show promise for the use of remote sensing data fusions for scaling up GEDI structure metrics of value for habitat modeling and other applications across broad continuous extents, further assessments are needed to test their performance within habitat modeling for additional species of conservation interest as well as biodiversity assessments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The tropical forests in the Amazon store large amounts of carbon and are still considered a carbon sink. There is evidence that deforestation can turn a forest landscape into a carbon source due to land use and forest degradation. Deforestation causes fragmented forest landscapes. It is known from field experiments that forest dynamics at the edge of forest fragments are altered by changes in the microclimate and increased tree mortality ("edge effects"). However, it is unclear how this will affect large fragmented forest landscapes, and thus the entire Amazon region. The aim of this study is to investigate different forest attributes in edge and core forest areas at high resolution, and thus to identify the large-scale impacts of small-scale edge effects. Therefore, a well-established framework combining forest modelling and lidar-generated forest structure information was combined with radar-based forest cover data. Furthermore, forests were also analyzed at the landscape level to investigate changes between highly fragmented and less-fragmented landscapes. This study found that the aboveground biomass in forest edge areas is 27% lower than in forest core areas. In contrast, the net primary productivity is 13% higher in forest edge areas than in forest core areas. In the second step, whole fragmented landscapes were analyzed. Nearly 30% of all forest landscapes are highly fragmented, particularly in the regions of the Arc of Deforestation, on the edge of the Andes and on the Amazon river banks. Less-fragmented landscapes are mainly located in the central Amazon rainforest. The aboveground biomass is 28% lower in highly fragmented forest landscapes than in less-fragmented landscapes. The net primary productivity is 13% higher in highly fragmented forest landscapes than in less-fragmented forest landscapes. In summary, fragmentation of the Amazon rainforest has an impact on forest attributes such as biomass and productivity, with mostly negative effects on forest dynamics. If deforestation continues and the proportion of highly fragmented forest landscapes increase, the effect may be even more intense. By combining lidar, radar and forest modelling, this study shows that it is possible to map forest structure, and thus the degree of forest degradation, over a large area and derive more detailed information about the carbon dynamics of the Amazon region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]