Search

In diesem Review findet eine Auseinandersetzung mit dem Buch von Josef ZELGER über das Textanalyseverfahren GABEK® (Ganzheitliche Bewältigung von Komplexität) statt. Bei den meisten GABEK®-Projekten geht es um die Lösung eines konkreten Problems wie z.B. die Einführung eines neuen Arbeitszeitmodells oder um Stadtentwicklungsprojekte, die Ermittlung von Erfolgsfaktoren für Innovation u.Ä.m. Im Laufe der Jahre haben sich weitere Anwendungsmöglichkeiten entwickelt, zum Beispiel der simulierte Dialog, die Analyse von Träumen oder Kunstwerken. Die Methode kann auch für wissenschaftsnahe Projekte zur Hypothesenentwicklung und -prüfung sowie zur Theoriebildung eingesetzt werden. Das Buch ist umfangreich und versammelt Beiträge aus der 30-jährigen Entwicklungsgeschichte. Als Nachschlagewerk ist es ein Meilenstein für alle, die die Methode erlernen möchte. Dies lässt sich am besten erreichen, indem man sie anwendet. Das Buch kann hierzu als Referenz dienen. Ich schließe den Artikel mit einem kurzen Erfahrungsbericht., In this book review I closely examine the text analysis method GABEK® developed by Josef ZELGER. The acronym stands for Ganzheitliche Bewältigung von Komplexität, which can be translated to: holistic coping with complexity. Most GABEK® projects are about solving a specific problem, or questions such as the introduction of a new working time model, urban development, or success factors of innovation. Other possible applications have been developed over the years: for example, simulated conversations, analysis of dreams, and works of art. The methods can also be used for basic research projects for the purpose of developing and testing hypothesis and for developing theories. The book is extensive and brings together contributions from the 30-year history of development of GABEK®. As a reference work, it is a milestone for anyone who wants to use the method. At the conclusion of this article, I offer some insights from my own use of GABEK®.

In this book review I closely examine the text analysis method GABEK® developed by Josef ZELGER. The acronym stands for Ganzheitliche Bewältigung von Komplexität, which can be translated to: holistic coping with complexity. Most GABEK® projects are about solving a specific problem, or questions such as the introduction of a new working time model, urban development, or success factors of innovation. Other possible applications have been developed over the years: for example, simulated conversations, analysis of dreams, and works of art. The methods can also be used for basic research projects for the purpose of developing and testing hypothesis and for developing theories. The book is extensive and brings together contributions from the 30-year history of development of GABEK®. As a reference work, it is a milestone for anyone who wants to use the method. At the conclusion of this article, I offer some insights from my own use of GABEK®. In diesem Review findet eine Auseinandersetzung mit dem Buch von Josef ZELGER über das Textanalyseverfahren GABEK® (Ganzheitliche Bewältigung von Komplexität) statt. Bei den meisten GABEK®-Projekten geht es um die Lösung eines konkreten Problems wie z.B. die Einführung eines neuen Arbeitszeitmodells oder um Stadtentwicklungsprojekte, die Ermittlung von Erfolgsfaktoren für Innovation u.Ä.m. Im Laufe der Jahre haben sich weitere Anwendungsmöglichkeiten entwickelt, zum Beispiel der simulierte Dialog, die Analyse von Träumen oder Kunstwerken. Die Methode kann auch für wissenschaftsnahe Projekte zur Hypothesenentwicklung und -prüfung sowie zur Theoriebildung eingesetzt werden. Das Buch ist umfangreich und versammelt Beiträge aus der 30-jährigen Entwicklungsgeschichte. Als Nachschlagewerk ist es ein Meilenstein für alle, die die Methode erlernen möchte. Dies lässt sich am besten erreichen, indem man sie anwendet. Das Buch kann hierzu als Referenz dienen. Ich schließe den Artikel mit einem kurzen Erfahrungsbericht.

International audience; Most of research on destination governance focuses on reporting the results of single case studies, whose findings are often related to the particularities of the specific destinations considered. As a result, there is little (empirical) consistency in underlying principles and dimensions of destination governance. To overcome this gap, this paper presents a combined (re-)analysis of multiple qualitative case studies and empirically develops destination governance dimensions from a practitioner point of view. Findings show that theoretical conceptualisation of destination governance and practical foci differ in some respects: In contrast to governance theory, practitioners refer more to context, process and change.

Although the digital transformation of knowledge production has put communication front and center in the production and recreation of academic fields, research on scientific communities still mostly promotes an actor-centric or institutionalist understanding of academic fields. This, we argue, points to the need for a digital transformation of our understanding of academic fields, one that does justice to the important role of communication in the production and recreation of academic fields. Therefore, in this paper, we draw on the “communicative constitution of organizations” (CCO) view to explore how academic fields are communicatively constituted. Our GABEK-based discourse analysis focuses on the communicative constitution of the academic field of corporate social responsibility. Our findings illustrate how academic fields are constituted through the enactment of three communicative practices: embedding, diverging, and converging. Furthermore, our results indicate how the communicative constitution of academic fields occurs through the sequential enactment of these practices. Our theoretical framework extends the literatures on scientific communities and CCO by beginning to develop a communication view of academic fields. These ideas also have implications for the digital transformation of social theory more generally.

Background: The two main obstacles of the German penal system are reintegration of the prisoner and protection of the general population. Prevention and treatment of drug-related disorders are less important. In addition, there is a lack of financial resources for health-related services in prison and specialized prison staff in addiction medicine. The execution of criminal justice in Germany falls within the domain of the German Laender. Since 2006, the Laender have also been responsible for legislation in this area. There is no established national data collection procedure on the health of prison inmates in Germany. However, regional data surveys and individual studies focusing on sub-populations of individual facilities do exist. In order to create standardized treatment guidelines for drug users in prison, a comprehensive overview and a nationwide regulation are needed. Therefore, national data are being collected to assess quality and quantity of drug-related health care services in German prisons. The aim of this dissertation is to demonstrate structural strengths and weaknesses of drug-related health care in German prisons. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was chosen. Quantitative data was collected using a comprehensive questionnaire, which was sent to the Ministries of justice of all 16 Laender. The questionnaire collected data about the percentage of drug use, intravenous drug use and infectious diseases on reception into prison and during imprisonment, as well as type and extent of drug-related health care services in German prisons. Reference date was 31st March 2010. Qualitative data was collected via 15 qualitative semi-structured interviews, of which 11 were conducted in Bavaria and 4 in Berlin. Data was collected and compared in 2 Laender, which have two very different approaches concerning the drug problem: Bavaria, a territorial state, restrictive and emphasising sanctions and Berlin, a city state, with a focus on harm reduction. Interviewees were prison health care staff and consultants, prison guards, a former prisoner, prison nurses, and probation officers. In the interviews, respondents were asked to describe their everyday work, its challenges and how those challenges could be addressed. The interviews were analysed using GABEK WinRelanA and results were presented in network graphs. Results and Discussion: 14 out of 16 Laender answered the questionnaire. There was an average of 50 % missing items. Another half of the missing items was commented with a data is not recordeda . Concerning drug use the results show that around 30 % of the prisoners were tested upon admission. Upon admission the percentage of positive results was higher than during imprisonment (45 % vs. 16 %). Results show that during imprisonment, there is especially a decrease in the use of opioids (17 % vs. 10 %) and cocaine (10 % vs. 1 %). In contrast, the percentage of positive drug tests increased for some substances, especially for Cannabis (57 % vs. 75 %) and a othera substances (1 % vs. 15 %). Concerning intravenous drug use, results indicate a percentage of 47 % intravenous drug users among all drug users, which equates to 11 % of all prisoners. Concerning infectious diseases, around 50 % of the prisoners were tested upon admission, with 0,8 % tests positive for HIV, 1,8 % positive for Hepatitis B and 15 % positive for Hepatitis C. The results of the questionnaire in combination with the interviews, several topics turned out to be of relevance: the role of the justice system in strengthening the motivation to abstinence, therapy instead of punishment, working in a prison and (not) being part of the justice system, educating prisoners and prison guards, vaccinating, testing and treating of infectious diseases, harm reduction services, opioid substitution therapy and preparations for release. Taking together the results of this study, it can be summarized that at the time of the data collection there was no equivalent health care in German prisons compared to the general population. There is still a huge potential for improvement of the criminal justice system and especially of the prison health care system concerning drug use inmates. Change processes take a while and usually start on an individual level.