Search

Objectives Recently, the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer achieved a reduction in prostate cancer mortality by measuring serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. These results were not reproduced in the Spanish arm of European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. PSA contamination (opportunistic measurements outside the study) could decrease the study's contrasting power if performed in the control arm. We have calculated the long-term rate of PSA contamination and its effect on performing prostate biopsy and detecting cancer. Material and methods A total of 4276 men were randomized (2415 to the screening arm, 1861 to the control arm) in the Spanish section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. PSA measurements were not scheduled in the control arm. Sextant prostate biopsy was indicated if PSA levels were ≥3 ng/ml. All PSA readings performed outside the study were labeled as “PSA contamination”. We calculated the rates of PSA contamination, biopsy implementation and cancer detection. Results The median age and follow-up time were 57 and 15.1 years, respectively. A total of 2511 men underwent at least one PSA reading outside the study. PSA contamination at 5, 10 and 15 years was 22.0%, 47.1% and 66.3% in the screening arm, respectively, and 20.8%, 43.2% and 58.6% in the control arm, respectively ( p p p = 0.0006). Conclusions Although the cumulative PSA contamination was pronounced in the 2 study arms, the rate of prostate biopsies was low in the control arm. We therefore believe that the effect of PSA contamination on the study's statistical power should be limited.

Objetivos: Recientemente, el Estudio Aleatorizado Europeo de Screening del Cáncer de Próstata consiguió una reducción de la mortalidad por cáncer de próstata mediante la determinación sérica de antígeno específico-prostático (PSA). Estos resultados no fueron reproducidos en la rama española del Estudio Aleatorizado Europeo de Screening del Cáncer de Próstata. La contaminación de PSA (determinación oportunista fuera del estudio) podría disminuir el poder de contraste del estudio si se lleva a cabo en el brazo control. Hemos calculado la tasa de contaminación de PSA a largo plazo, y su efecto en la realización de biopsia prostática y en la detección de cáncer. Material y métodos: Se aleatorizaron 4.276 varones (2.415 brazo screening, 1.861 brazo control) en la sección española del Estudio Aleatorizado Europeo de Screening del Cáncer de Próstata. No se programó la determinación de PSA en el brazo control. Se indicó biopsia prostática sextante si PSA ≥ 3 ng/ml. Toda determinación de PSA realizada fuera del estudio fue etiquetada como «contaminación de PSA». Se calcularon las tasas de contaminación de PSA, realización de biopsia y detección de cáncer. Resultados: Las medianas de edad y tiempo de seguimiento fueron de 57 y 15,1 años respectivamente. Un total de 2.511 varones se realizó al menos una determinación de PSA fuera del estudio. La contaminación de PSA a los 5, 10 y 15 años fue del 22; 47,1 y 66,3% en el brazo screening, y del 20,8; 43,2 y 58,6 en el brazo control, respectivamente (p < 0,0001). La tasa de biopsia a los 5, 10 y 15 años fue del 19,3; 22,6 y 24,1% (screening) y del 1; 3,6 y 7,1% (control), respectivamente (p < 0,0001). La detección de cáncer de próstata fue del 6,7% (screening) y del 4,3% (control, p = 0,0006). Conclusiones: Aunque la contaminación acumulada de PSA fue notable en los 2 brazos del estudio, la realización de biopsia prostática fue escasa en el brazo control. Por ello, creemos que el impacto de la contaminación de PSA sobre el poder estadístico del estudio debe ser limitado. Objectives: Recently, the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer achieved a reduction in prostate cancer mortality by measuring serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. These results were not reproduced in the Spanish arm of European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. PSA contamination (opportunistic measurements outside the study) could decrease the study's contrasting power if performed in the control arm. We have calculated the long-term rate of PSA contamination and its effect on performing prostate biopsy and detecting cancer. Material and methods: A total of 4,276 men were randomised (2,415 to the screening arm, 1,861 to the control arm) in the Spanish section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. PSA measurements were not scheduled in the control arm. Sextant prostate biopsy was indicated if PSA levels were ≥ 3 ng/mL. All PSA readings performed outside the study were labelled as “PSA contamination”. We calculated the rates of PSA contamination, biopsy implementation and cancer detection. Results: The median age and follow-up time were 57 and 15.1 years, respectively. A total of 2,511 men underwent at least one PSA reading outside the study. PSA contamination at 5, 10 and 15 years was 22.0%, 47.1% and 66.3% in the screening arm, respectively, and 20.8%, 43.2% and 58.6% in the control arm, respectively (P < .0001). The biopsy rate at 5, 10 and 15 years was 19.3%, 22.6% and 24.1% (screening), respectively, and 1.0%, 3.6% and 7.1% (control), respectively (P < .0001). The PC detection rate was 6.7% (screening) and 4.3% (control; P = .0006). Conclusions: Although the cumulative PSA contamination was pronounced in the 2 study arms, the rate of prostate biopsies was low in the control arm. We therefore believe that the effect of PSA contamination on the study's statistical power should be limited. Sin financiación 1.181 JCR (2016) Q4, 60/77 Urology & Nephrology UEM

Objetivo: En la actualidad el papel del screening del cáncer de próstata (CaP) está cuestionado. El estudio aleatorizado europeo de screening del cáncer de próstata (ERSPC) tiene como objetivo demostrar si el screening del CaP reduce la mortalidad por esta enfermedad. Se muestran los resultados en la rama española de este estudio: mortalidad global y cáncer-específica, características de los tumores detectados, de los tratamientos primarios y de la progresión a enfermedad avanzada. Material y métodos: Se invitó a participar a 18.612 varones entre los 45 y 70 años de edad, excluyendo aquellos con una expectativa de vida inferior a 10 años. Se llevó a cabo aleatorización a brazo screening (determinación de PSA sérico) y brazo control (no pruebas diagnósticas). Se indicó biopsia prostática aleatorizada sextante dirigida por ecografía transrectal en los varones del brazo screening con PSA ≥ 3 ng/ml. Se identificaron los CaP detectados (estadio y tratamiento primarios), así como los fallecimientos producidos (fecha y causa de la muerte). Resultados: El estudio se llevó a cabo con 4.276 varones (2.415 brazo screening, 1.861 brazo control). Las medianas de edad y PSA sérico fueron de 57 años y 0,90 ng/ml respectivamente. El tiempo de seguimiento (mediana) fue de 15,8 años. Se diagnosticaron 242 CaP, 162 (6,7%) en el brazo screening y 80 (4,3%) en el control (p < 0,001). De ellos 214 (88,4%) comenzaron con estadio clínico organoconfinado (91,4% brazo screening vs 82,5% control, p = 0,024). Un total de 112 pacientes (46,3%) fue sometido a prostatectomía radical, 53 (21,9%) a radioterapia prostática, 24 (9,9%) a tratamiento hormonal y 47 (19,4%) a observación. Un total de 18 CaP evolucionaron a enfermedad avanzada (M+ o PSA > 100 ng/ml), sin diferencia entre los brazos del estudio (p = 0,938). Un total de 618 (14,5%) fallecieron a lo largo del seguimiento: 340 (14,1%) en el brazo screening y 278 (14,9%) en el control, sin diferencias entre brazos en términos de mortalidad cáncer-específica (p = 0,907) ni por todas las causas (p = 0,399). Las principales causas de muerte encontradas fueron neoplasia (54,0%), cardiovascular (17,6%), respiratoria (8,7%) y digestiva (4,0%), sin diferencia entre brazos. De los 334 pacientes fallecidos por neoplasia tan solo 12 (3,6%) murieron por CaP. Conclusiones: El screening del CaP produce una migración del diagnóstico hacia estadios más precoces. No obstante, no hemos demostrado un beneficio en términos de supervivencia global ni cáncer-específica tras más de 15 años de seguimiento. La baja mortalidad por esta enfermedad en nuestro entorno podría ser uno de los principales factores para explicar estos resultados. Objective: The role of prostate cancer (PC) screening is currently being questioned. The objective of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) was to demonstrate whether PC screening reduced mortality from this disease. The results from the Spanish branch of this study are presented: all-cause and cancer-specific mortality, the characteristics of the detected tumors, primary treatments and progression to advanced disease. Material and methods: A total of 18,612 men, between the ages of 45 and 70, were invited to participate in the study, excluding those with a life expectancy of less than 10 years. The men were randomized to the screening arm (serum prostate-specific antigen [PSA] reading) or the control arm (no diagnostic tests). Randomized transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant prostate biopsies were indicated for the men in the screening arm with PSA levels ≥ 3 ng/ml. The detected PCs were identified (stage and primary treatment), as well as the deaths that occurred (date and cause of death). Results: The study was performed with 4276 men (2415 in the screening arm and 1861 in the control arm). The median age and serum PSA level were 57 years and 0.90 ng/mL, respectively. The median follow-up time was 15.8 years. A total of 242 PCs were diagnosed, 162 (6.7%) in the screening arm and 80 (4.3%) in the control arm (P < .001). Of these, 214 (88.4%) had an organ-confined clinical stage at onset (91.4% in the screening arm vs. 82.5% in the control arm; P = .024). A total of 112 patients (46.3%) underwent radical prostatectomy, 53 (21.9%) underwent prostate radiation therapy, 24 (9.9%) underwent hormone therapy and 47 (19.4%) were kept under observation. A total of 18 PCs progressed to advanced disease (M+ or PSA levels > 100 ng/mL), with no differences between the study arms (P = .938). A total of 618 (14.5%) patients died during follow-up: 340 (14.1%) in the screening arm and 278 (14.9%) in the control arm, with no differences between the arms in terms of cancer-specific (P = .907) or all-cause (P = .399) mortality. The main causes of death were neoplasia (54.0%), cardiovascular (17.6%), respiratory (8.7%) and gastrointestinal (4.0%), with no difference between study arms. Of the 334 patients who died from neoplasia, only 12 (3.6%) died from PC. Conclusions: PC screening results in a shifting of the diagnosis towards earlier stages. Nevertheless, we have not demonstrated a benefit in terms of overall or cancer-specific survival after more than 15 years of follow-up. The low mortality from this disease in our community could be one of the main factors that explain these results. Sin financiación 0.964 JCR (2015) Q4, 63/77 Urology & Nephrology UEM

Objective The role of prostate cancer (PC) screening is currently being questioned. The objective of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) was to demonstrate whether PC screening reduced mortality from this disease. The results from the Spanish branch of this study are presented: all-cause and cancer-specific mortality, the characteristics of the detected tumors, primary treatments and progression to advanced disease. Materials and methods A total of 18,612 men, between the ages of 45 and 70, were invited to participate in the study, excluding those with a life expectancy of less than 10 years. The men were randomized to the screening arm (serum prostate-specific antigen [PSA] reading) or the control arm (no diagnostic tests). Randomized transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant prostate biopsies were indicated for the men in the screening arm with PSA levels ≥3 ng/ml. The detected PCs were identified (stage and primary treatment), as well as the deaths that occurred (date and cause of death). Results The study was performed with 4276 men (2415 in the screening arm and 1861 in the control arm). The median age and serum PSA level were 57 years and 0.90 ng/mL, respectively. The median follow-up time was 15.8 years. A total of 242 PCs were diagnosed, 162 (6.7%) in the screening arm and 80 (4.3%) in the control arm ( p p = .024). A total of 112 patients (46.3%) underwent radical prostatectomy, 53 (21.9%) underwent prostate radiation therapy, 24 (9.9%) underwent hormone therapy and 47 (19.4%) were kept under observation. A total of 18 PCs progressed to advanced disease (M+ or PSA levels >100 ng/mL), with no differences between the study arms ( p = .938). A total of 618 (14.5%) patients died during follow-up: 340 (14.1%) in the screening arm and 278 (14.9%) in the control arm, with no differences between the arms in terms of cancer-specific ( p = .907) or all-cause ( p = .399) mortality. The main causes of death were neoplasia (54.0%), cardiovascular (17.6%), respiratory (8.7%) and gastrointestinal (4.0%), with no difference between study arms. Of the 334 patients who died from neoplasia, only 12 (3.6%) died from PC. Conclusions PC screening results in a shifting of the diagnosis toward earlier stages. Nevertheless, we have not demonstrated a benefit in terms of overall or cancer-specific survival after more than 15 years of follow-up. The low mortality from this disease in our community could be one of the main factors that explain these results.

To present the long-term results of a prostate cancer (PC) screening trial conducted in a Mediterranean setting.A total of 4276 men aged 45-70 years were randomized to screening arm (PSA test performed) and control arm (no tests). Transrectal ultrasonography-guided sextant prostate biopsy was conducted when PSAor = 3 ng ml(-1). Date and cause of death were retrieved from death certificates. PC incidence, and disease-specific and overall mortality curves were plotted and comparison between arms was made. Analysis of causes of death was also performed.Median age at randomization was 57.0 years. Median follow-up time was 15.2 years. A total of 241 men were diagnosed with PC, 161 (6.7%) in the screening arm and 80 (4.3%) in the control arm (P0.01). Eventually, 554 men (13%) died. No difference in all-cause mortality was found between arms (P=0.34). Only 10 men (10/4276, 0.23%) died from PC, no differences between arms (P=0.67). Overall, the main causes of death were malignancy (54.2%), cardiovascular (17.9%) and respiratory (9.2%) diseases. Main cancer causes of death were lung and bronchus cancer (37.2%), colorectum (15.0%) and stomach (9.0%) cancer. PC only accounted for 3.0% of all malignant causes of death (ranked 10th).Our study failed to demonstrate benefits of PC screening in terms of all-cause and PC-specific mortality after a median follow-up of 15 years. The limited sample size and the low long-term PC mortality observed in our setting were probably the most important factors to explain these results.

OBJECTIVES To analyze whether C-reactive protein (CRP) predicts the need for urgent urinary diversion in patients with renal colic and urolithiasis. CRP may help in the differential diagnosis of complicated hydronephrosis. METHODS Prospective study done on 110 consecutive patients with renal colic secondary to upper urinary tract calculi admitted in the emergency room. Clinical and analytical data were collected. Criteria for emergency drainage had been established in advance, based on the risk of sepsis, renal failure, persistence of pain, and findings on computed tomography scan. CRP was blindly determined using immunoturbidimetric assay on the Integra 700 analyzer. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney test, Cox multivariate analysis, and receiver operating characteristic curves, to determine optimum cut-off points to decide drainage based on laboratory data. RESULTS Mean CRP value was 47.6 mg/L (CI, 31.4-63.8), 139.6 mg/L (CI, 13-183.1) in 29 patients treated with diversion and 14.67 mg/L (CI, 6.7-22.5) in the control group (P < .001). Age, sex, rate of patients with hypertension, history of cardiovascular disease, leukocyte total count, and serum creatinine differed between groups (P < .05). Regression analysis revealed CRP (P < .0001) and age (P = .0001) were predictive of urinary diversion. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed 68.4% area under the curve for creatinine, 68.8% for leukocytosis, and 86.8% for CRP. A cut-off point for CRP of 28 mg/L achieved optimum sensitivity (75.8%) and specificity (88.9%) for determining the decision for drainage. CONCLUSIONS Determination of CRP in patients with renal colic due to urolithiasis provides an objective and useful parameter for deciding placement of urinary stent, which is even more valuable than leukocytosis or seric creatinine level. UROLOGY 76: 301-306, 2010. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. 2.334 JCR (2010) Q2, 26/69 Urology & nephrology

Aglossia is a rare anomaly caused by failed embryogenesis of the lateral lingual swellings and tuberculum impar from the fourth to eighth gestational weeks. Most cases of aglossia and hypoglossia reported in the literature were associated with limb deformities, cleft palate, deafness, situs inversus, and several syndromes, such as Moebius, Pierre Robin, and Hanhart. This report describes the case of a 14-year-old girl with complete aglossia. As the tongue plays an important role in facial growth, this patient had dentofacial deformities that affected the mandible in particular. She also had severe malocclusion and agenesis of permanent mandibular incisors. Thyroid dysfunction, recently associated with aglossia, was not observed. The use of rapid prototyping models of the jaws as an aid to osteogenic distraction of the mandibular symphysis is also described.