Search

Summary Several reports have described various strategies of dendritic cell (DC) vaccination to induce specific T-cell responses in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). About 50–60% of AML cases blasts have chromosomal abnormalities, such as inv(16) or t(8,21), which could encode for leukaemia-specific antigenic peptide sequences, possibly presented in the context of self-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. As the co-culture of AML blasts with T lymphocytes seldom resulted in T-cell stimulation, we fused AML blasts with autologous DC to enhance this effect. The fusion cells expressed MHC class I and II, CD40, B7-1, B7-2, CD209 and several adhesion molecules. In a mixed lymphocyte hybrid reaction, the fusion cells induced the proliferation of autologous T cells. Moreover, in the special case of fusion cells established from AML blasts with the chromosomal abnormality inv(16), the autologous T lymphocytes could be primed to induce cytotoxicity against up to 70% autologous AML blasts in a effector:target ratio of 20:1. Blocking assays demonstrated that the lysis was chiefly mediated by CD8+, CCR7− T lymphocytes, which could be further expanded in the form of effector memory CD8+ T cells by repeated co-cultures with the autologous fusion cells.

Rituximab plus chemotherapy, most often CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), is the first-line standard of care for patients with advanced indolent lymphoma, and for elderly patients with mantle-cell lymphoma. Bendamustine plus rituximab is effective for relapsed or refractory disease. We compared bendamustine plus rituximab with CHOP plus rituximab (R-CHOP) as first-line treatment for patients with indolent and mantle-cell lymphomas.We did a prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial at 81 centres in Germany between Sept 1, 2003, and Aug 31, 2008. Patients aged 18 years or older with a WHO performance status of 2 or less were eligible if they had newly diagnosed stage III or IV indolent or mantle-cell lymphoma. Patients were stratified by histological lymphoma subtype, then randomly assigned according to a prespecified randomisation list to receive either intravenous bendamustine (90 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 of a 4-week cycle) or CHOP (cycles every 3 weeks of cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2), and vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) on day 1, and prednisone 100 mg/day for 5 days) for a maximum of six cycles. Patients in both groups received rituximab 375 mg/m(2) on day 1 of each cycle. Patients and treating physicians were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, with a non-inferiority margin of 10%. Analysis was per protocol. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00991211, and the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices of Germany, BfArM 4021335.274 patients were assigned to bendamustine plus rituximab (261 assessed) and 275 to R-CHOP (253 assessed). At median follow-up of 45 months (IQR 25-57), median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the bendamustine plus rituximab group than in the R-CHOP group (69.5 months [26.1 to not yet reached] vs 31.2 months [15.2-65.7]; hazard ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.74; p0.0001). Bendamustine plus rituximab was better tolerated than R-CHOP, with lower rates of alopecia (0 patients vs 245 (100%) of 245 patients who recieved ≥3 cycles; p0.0001), haematological toxicity (77 [30%] vs 173 [68%]; p0.0001), infections (96 [37%] vs 127 [50%]); p=0.0025), peripheral neuropathy (18 [7%] vs 73 [29%]; p0.0001), and stomatitis (16 [6%] vs 47 [19%]; p0.0001). Erythematous skin reactions were more common in patients in the bendamustine plus rituximab group than in those in the R-CHOP group (42 [16%] vs 23 [9%]; p=0.024).In patients with previously untreated indolent lymphoma, bendamustine plus rituximab can be considered as a preferred first-line treatment approach to R-CHOP because of increased progression-free survival and fewer toxic effects.Roche Pharma AG, Ribosepharm/Mundipharma GmbH.

Several reports have described various strategies of dendritic cell (DC) vaccination to induce specific T-cell responses in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). About 50-60% of AML cases blasts have chromosomal abnormalities, such as inv(16) or t(8,21), which could encode for leukaemia-specific antigenic peptide sequences, possibly presented in the context of self-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. As the co-culture of AML blasts with T lymphocytes seldom resulted in T-cell stimulation, we fused AML blasts with autologous DC to enhance this effect. The fusion cells expressed MHC class I and II, CD40, B7-1, B7-2, CD209 and several adhesion molecules. In a mixed lymphocyte hybrid reaction, the fusion cells induced the proliferation of autologous T cells. Moreover, in the special case of fusion cells established from AML blasts with the chromosomal abnormality inv(16), the autologous T lymphocytes could be primed to induce cytotoxicity against up to 70% autologous AML blasts in a effector:target ratio of 20:1. Blocking assays demonstrated that the lysis was chiefly mediated by CD8(+), CCR7(-) T lymphocytes, which could be further expanded in the form of effector memory CD8(+) T cells by repeated co-cultures with the autologous fusion cells.

Abstract 2724 Background: The NHL 1 study, a prospective, multicenter, randomized, phase 3 study which compared B-R and CHOP-R as first-line treatment in indolent lymphomas and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), demonstrated a significant benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) as well as improved tolerability for B-R compared with CHOP-R. Here we present an analysis of the impact of response quality on outcome. Methods: 514 patients (pts) with indolent or MCL were randomized to receive B-R or CHOP-R for a maximum of 6 cycles. Results: The overall response rate in the 514 pts (261 B-R; 253 CHOP-R) was 92.7% and 91.3% in the B-R and CHOP-R arms, respectively (as presented at the last ASCO meeting, J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 3). A complete response (CR) was observed in 39.8% in the B-R arm and in 30% in the CHOP-R arm (p=0.021). The achievement of CR was associated with a significantly prolonged PFS and overall survival (OS) (Table 1). Analysis by treatment arm revealed a trend for superior PFS and a significantly improved OS for patients achieving CR following treatment with B-R. In the CHOP-R arm, patients in CR had a significantly superior PFS compared to those in PR with a trend to superior OS. Regardless of the quality of response, PFS was superior with B-R versus CHOP-R: For patients in CR, the median PFS was not reached with B-R, whereas for CHOP-R it was 53.7 months (p=0.0204). In patients achieving PR, treatment with B-R resulted in a median PFS of 57.2 months, and this was 30.9 months with CHOP-R (p=0.0002). We noted a statistically significant difference in CR rates between male (n=272, median age 63 years) and female (n=242, median age 64 years) patients. The CR rate was 28.6% in male patients and 42.1% in female patients (p=0.0016). Female patients had a longer median PFS (51.4 months) compared to male patients (38.6 months), however, this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.0866). Conclusions: Patients in CR following first-line treatment in our study had a significantly longer PFS and OS compared to those achieving a PR. Therefore, our results strongly suggest an association between quality of response and outcome. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.