Search

To compare iron lung (ILV) versus mask ventilation (NPPV) in the treatment of COPD patients with acute on chronic respiratory failure (ACRF).Randomised multicentre study.Respiratory intermediate intensive care units very skilled in ILV.A total of 141 patients met the inclusion criteria and were assigned: 70 to ILV and 71 to NPPV. To establish the failure of the technique employed as first line major and minor criteria for endotracheal intubation (EI) were used. With major criteria EI was promptly established. With at least two minor criteria patients were shifted from one technique to the other.On admission, PaO(2)/FiO(2), 198 (70) and 187 (64), PaCO(2), 90.5 (14.1) and 88.7 (13.5) mmHg, and pH 7.25 (0.04) and 7.25 (0.05), were similar for ILV and NPPV groups. When used as first line, the success of ILV (87%) was significantly greater (P = 0.01) than NPPV (68%), due to the number of patients that met minor criteria for EI; after the shift of the techniques; however, the need of EI and hospital mortality was similar in both groups. The total rate of success using both techniques increased from 77.3 to 87.9% (P = 0.028).The sequential use of NPPV and ILV avoided EI in a large percentage of COPD patients with ACRF; ILV was more effective than NPPV on the basis of minor criteria for EI but after the crossover the need of EI on the basis of major criteria and mortality was similar in both groups of patients.

One hundred three patients with upper aerodigestive cancer were consecutively submitted to upper GI endoscopy with vital staining (Toluidine Blue 1%) of the oesophagus. The aim of the study was not only to confirm the prevalence of synchronous or metachronous tumour but also to verify the usefulness of the vital stain compared to simple endoscopy. Staining was positive in 29 patients (28.1%) for oesophagitis, leukoplakia, Barrett's oesophagus and 3 oesophageal neoplasms (2.9%), two of them unsuspected at endoscopy. We did not observe false positives while 13 cases (13/29-44.8%) were considered normal at endoscopy. Five cases with some endoscopic abnormality of the mucosa did not stain and were considered false negatives. Specificity of the method was 100%, sensibility 85.2%. The recognition of dysplastic changes and neoplasms not suspected at endoscopy should recommend in our opinion the use of vital staining of oesophagus in high-risk groups.