Search

Introduction Since its early stages, the Covid-19 outbreak has posed immense challenges for effective, scalable and rapid interventions. Telehealth approaches have been considered as key part of an effective pandemic response. Objectives The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the role of digital solutions in fighting the mental health needs during COVID-19 outbreak. Methods This review was conducted through searching four databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct. Inclusion criteria included studies clearly defining any use of telehealth services in all aspects of mental health care during COVID-19 outbreak, published from December 31, 2019 to October 31, 2020, written in English language and published in peer-reviewed journals. Narrative synthesis was undertaken to summarize the findings according a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis. Results 62 studies met the inclusion out of the 278 search results. Data converged on: strengths in minimizing the risk of Covid-19 transmission, reduction of travel time and costs, comparable effectiveness to in-person care; weaknesses i.e. decreased ability to detect non-verbal cues, lower therapeutic alliance, possible technical connection problems; opportunities in improving the healthcare system and expanding its accessibility for patients also for the future; threats such as privacy and legal issues, and risk to overlook vulnerable populations (e.g. elderly, marginalized ethnic minorities). Conclusions In the midst of a global mental health emergency, telehealth may represent a “virtually perfect” solution. However, further implementations facing issues of quality, justice and healthcare equity are required to ensure that all patients receive the care they need.

Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are an established biomarker predicting antibody-mediated rejection, as the leading cause of graft loss after kidney transplantation. Furthermore, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching offers a more precise assessment of donor-recipient HLA compatibility and may prevent more effectively sensitization against allograft tissue. Indeed, increased number of HLA mismatches (MM) is significantly associated with a higher risk of immunological rejection, de novo DSA (dnDSA) development, and graft failure. Over the last decade, a comprehensive approach to optimize kidney matching and monitor transplant recipients for acute and chronic graft dysfunction was the goal for the success of the kidney transplantation. In our long-term retrospective study, we have found that pre- and post-transplantation HLA antibodies were significantly associated with de novo dnDSA occurrence (pre-transplant HLA Class I antibodies p = 0.039p < 0.05; pre-transplant HLA Class II antibodies p = 0.011p < 0.05; post-transplant HLA Class I non-DSA antibodies p < 0.01; post-transplant HLA Class II non-DSA antibodies p < 0.01). In addition, HLA MM at locus A (hazard ratio (HR), 2.44; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.15-5.16; p = 0.01 hazard ratio (HR), 2.33; 95 % confidence interval (CI):1.132-4.805; p = 0.02) and DSA Class I (HR, 10.24; 95 % CI: 1.44-72.62; p = 0.02 HR, 5.539; 95 % CI: 1.264-24.272; p = 0.02) appeared to be significant predictors of poorer graft survival. Our investigation demonstrates the long medium-term experience of DSA development occurrence in patients with after kidney transplantation in Campania region - Italy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Mental health disorders and chronic health diseases are highly prevalent and impactful consequences of distressful experiences among refugees, yet a comprehensive conceptual model encompassing biopsychosocial factors is lacking. This study aims to assess the relevance of widowhood to PTSD and major depression maintenance as well as to adverse health outcomes in a cohort of Bosnian refugees., Methods: This longitudinal study included 526 subjects followed up for 3 years. The interviews were conducted in refugee camps in Varaždin, Croatia, in the Bosnian language. Data were collected using the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire and Hopkins Checklist-25, respectively. Physical health disorders were self-reported., Results: Both at baseline and endpoint female gender and marital loss are associated with a statistically significant higher burden of psychological and physical health outcomes. This group showed higher rates of PTSD and major depression disorders, as high comorbidity with hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, asthma and arthritis., Discussion: The results of the present study align with a wealth of literature studies linking marital loss to shifts in mental health and impaired physical health. A conceptual framework is provided for understanding how both mental health and physical health outcomes are highly dependent on social phenomena., Conclusions: This investigation reinforces the hypothesis of the role of social bonds and marital support in recovery from trauma experiences. Further studies are, however, needed for a better understanding of the consequences of adverse events on trauma-exposed subjects from a holistic bio-psycho-social point of view.

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak has magnified existing health inequities linked to social determinants of health, with racial and ethnic minorities being disproportionately affected by the pandemic. A proposed strategy to address these inequities is based on the implementation of community health worker (CHW) programs able to bridge the gaps between marginalized communities and the formal health care systems. A scoping review was conducted through searching 4 databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct. Inclusion criteria focused on studies defining any kind of adopted CHW intervention to address inequities related to racial/ethnic groups during the COVID-19 crisis, published from December 31, 2019, to October 31, 2021. Narrative synthesis was undertaken to summarize the findings. In total, 23 studies met the inclusion out of the 107 search results. Data converged on the relevant potential of CHWs on engaging with community leaders, addressing social determinants of health, and issues related to structural racism, promoting culturally tailored health information, and encouraging institutions to policy change in favor of people left behind. Although vulnerability of racial and ethnic minorities was already present before the COVID-19 outbreak, the pandemic has represented a wakeup call to address it more efficiently. In recent years, CHWs have increasingly been acknowledged as valuable members of the health care workforce. As health disparities may increase after our multicultural societies begin to recover from COVID-19, CHWs may play a crucial role in addressing system-level changes to have broad and lasting effects on health outcomes.

Since its early stages, the COVID-19 pandemic has interacted with existing divides by ethnicity and socioeconomic statuses, exacerbating further inequalities in high-income countries. The Swedish public health strategy, built on mutual trust between the government and the society and giving the responsibility to the individual, has been criticized for not applying a dedicated and more diverse strategy for most disadvantaged migrants in dealing with the pandemic. In order to mitigate the unequal burden on the marginalized members of society, increasing efforts have been addressed to digital health technologies. Despite the strong potential of providing collective public health benefits, especially in a highly digitalized context as Sweden, need for a stronger cooperation between the public health authorities and migrant community leaders, representatives of migrant associations, religious leaders and other influencers of disadvantaged groups has emerged. Suggestions are presented on more culturally congruent, patient-centered health care services aimed to empower people to participate in a more effective public health response to the COVID-19 crisis.