Search

The introduction of closed-loop systems in the pediatric population has been a revolution in the management and evolution of diabetes. However, there are not many published studies in situations in which the feeding, schedules, and activities of the children deviate from the routine for which the systems were programmed, as in the case of a summer camp for children and adolescents with diabetes, where the specific programming of this device is not well known. It was a single-center prospective preliminary study. A total of twenty-seven patients (mean age 11.9 ± 1.9 years, 40% male, duration of diabetes 6.44 ± 2.83 years) were included (twenty with Medtronic MiniMed 780G system and seven with Tandem Control-IQ). Glucometric variables and pump functionality were monitored during the 7-day camp and in the following 3 weeks. There was no decrease from the objective TIR 70% at any moment. The worst results in Time Below Range were at 72 h from starting the camp, and the worst results in Time Above Range were in the first 24 h, with a progressive improvement after that. No episodes of level 3 hypoglycemia or ketoacidosis occurred. The use of specific programming in two integrated systems, with complex blood glucose regulation algorithms and not-prepared-for situations with increased levels of physical activity or abrupt changes in feeding routines, did not result in an increased risk of level 3 hypoglycemia and ketoacidosis for our pediatric type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients, regardless of the closed-loop device. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In recent years, technological advances in the field of diabetes have revolutionized the management, prognosis, and quality of life of diabetes patients and their environment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of implementing the MiniMed 780G closed‐loop system in a pediatric and adolescent population previously treated with a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pump and intermittent glucose monitoring. Methods: Data were collected from 28 patients with type 1 diabetes aged 6 to 17 years, with a follow‐up of 6 months. We included both glucometric and quality of life variables, as well as quality of life in primary caregivers. Metabolic control variables were assessed at baseline (before system change) and at different cutoff points after initiation of the closed‐loop system (48 hours, 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months). Results: Time in range 70–180 mg/dL increased from 59.44% at baseline to 74.29% in the first 48 hours after automation of the new system, and this improvement was maintained at the other cutoff points, as was time in hyperglycemia 180–250 mg/dL (24.44% at baseline to 18.96% at 48 hours) and >250 mg/dL (11.71% at baseline to 3.82% at 48 hours). Conclusions: Our study showed an improvement in time in range and in all time spent in hyperglycemia from the first 48 hours after the automation of the system, which was maintained at 6 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Introduction: an assessment of hospital menus should be regularly performed to suit the needs of patients. Drinkable goat milk yogurt could have nutritional advantages over the cow's milk variety. Objectives: to evaluate the satisfaction of patients with the hospital menu and with the inclusion therein of drinkable goat milk yogurt as a dessert as compared to a cow milk dessert. Material and methods: a satisfaction survey for the hospital menu and its included dessert (non-sweetened goat milk yogurt vs a sweetened cow's milk dessert (yogurt or rice pudding)) was conducted in patients admitted with baseline diets. Results: in all, 214 responses were analyzed: 43.9% of respondents were women. Mean age was 62.1 ± 15.8 years, and average patient stay was 14.1 ± 20.1 days. Acceptance of the hospital menu was rated as good in a high percentage of respondents (temperature, 90.9%; preparation, 75.6%; presentation, 88.9%; time schedule, 73.7%). Overall satisfaction with the lunch meal (1 to 10) was 7.5 ± 2.1 in patients who took the drinkable goat milk yogurt vs 7.4 ± 2.2 in those who took the cow's milk dessert (NS); satisfaction with the dessert was 6.1 ± 3.2 vs 7.9 ± 2.5 (p < 0.000), respectively. Conclusions: overall satisfaction with the hospital menu was high, and the acceptance of the liquid goat milk yogurt was lower than that observed for the cow's milk dessert. The absence of sweeteners in the former may have influenced the results obtained. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]